,,american ,,society ,,of ,,civil ,,engineers ,,instituted #aheb ,,transactions ,paper ,no4 #aagf ,,reinforced ,,concrete ,,pier ,,construction4 ,,by ,,eugene ,,klapp1 ,m4 ,,am4 ,,soc4 ,c4 ,e4 ,,with ,,discussion ,,by ,,messrs4 ,,william ,,arthur ,,payne1 ,,and ,,eugene ,,klapp4 ,a private yacht pier1 built near ,glen ,cove1 ,long ,island1 has brought out a few points which may be of interest4 ,it is an example of a small engineering structure1 which1 though of no great moment in itself1 illustrates the adoption of means to an end that may be capable of very great extension4 ,the problem1 as submitted to the writer1 was to construct a yacht landing at ,east ,island1 on the exposed south shore of ,long ,island ,sound1 in connection with the construction at that point of an elaborate country residence4 ,the slope of the beach at this point is very gradual1 and it was specified that there should be a depth of at least #d ft4 of water at low tide4 ,soundings indicated that this necessitated a pier #cjj ft4 long4 ,it was further specified that the pier should be to some extent in keeping with the scale of the place being created there1 and that a wooden pile structure would not be acceptable4 ,besides these esthetic conditions1 wooden piles were rejected because the teredo1 in this part of the ,sound1 is very active4 ,at the same time1 the owner did not care to incur the expense of a masonry pier of the size involved4 ,also1 it was desired to unload on the pier all material for the house and grounds during construction1 and coal and other supplies thereafter1 thus necessitating a pier wide enough to allow access for a cart and horse and to provide room for turning at the pier head4 ,illustration3 ,,plate ,,xxx4--,,yacht ,,pier ,,near ,,glen ,,cove1 ,n4 ,y4 ,comparative designs and estimates were prepared for 7a7 a pier of ordinary construction1 but with creosoted piles2 7b7 a concrete pier on concrete piles2 and 7c7 for a series of concrete piers with wooden bridge connections4 ,the latter plan was very much the best in appearance1 and the calculated cost was less than that of the pier of concrete piles1 and only slightly more than that of creosoted piles1 the latter being only of a temporary nature in any case1 as it has been found that the protection afforded by creosote against the teredo is not permanent4 ,at this point on the ,sound the mean range of the tide is about #h ft41 and it was determined that at least #e ft4 above mean high water would be required to make the underside of the dock safe from wave action4 ,there is a northeast exposure1 with a long reach across the ,sound1 and the seas at times become quite heavy4 ,these considerations1 together with #d ft4 of water at low tide and from #b to #c ft4 of toe-hold in the beach1 required the outer caissons to be at least #bj ft4 high4 ,to construct such piers in the ordinary manner behind coffer-dams1 and in such an exposed location1 was to involve expenditure far beyond that which the owner cared to incur4 ,the writer's attention had shortly before been called to the successful use of reinforced concrete caissons on the ,great ,lakes for breakwater construction1 by ,major ,w4 ,v4 ,judson1 ,m4 ,am4 ,soc4 ,c4 ,e41 and under patents held by that officer4 ,it seemed that here was a solution of the problem4 ,these caissons are constructed on the shore1 preferably immediately adjoining the work4 ,after thorough inspection and seasoning1 they are usually launched in a manner somewhat similar to a boat1 are towed into position1 sunk in place1 and then filled with rip-rap4 ,in this case what was needed was a structure that could be constructed safely and cheaply in the air1 could then be allowed to harden thoroughly1 and could finally be placed in accurate position4 ,the weights to be supported were not great1 the beach was good gravel and sand1 fairly level1 and1 under favorable circumstances of good weather1 the placing of the caissons promised to be a simple matter4 ,therefore1 detailed plans were prepared for this structure4 ,an effort was made to preserve some element of the yachting idea in the design1 and bow-string trusses1 being merely enlarged gang planks1 were used to connect the caissons4 ,the pier was originally laid out as a letter ,l1 with a main leg of #cjj ft4 and a short leg of #cf ft4 ,the pier head consisted of eight caissons in close contact1 and was intended to form a breakwater1 in the angle of which1 and protected from the wave action1 was to be moored the float and boat landing4 ,after the first bids were received1 the owner wished to reduce the cost1 and every other caisson in the pier head was omitted1 so that1 as built1 the pier contains eight caissons and five #ec-;ft4 trusses4 ,the caissons supporting the trusses are #h ft4 wide and #ab ft4 long1 and those in the pier head are #ab by #ab ft4 ,on account of the shoal water and the great height of the outer caissons in comparison with their cross-section1 it seemed advisable to mould them in two sections4 ,the reinforcement in the side walls consisted of round #a_/b-;in4 rods horizontally1 and #c_/h-;in4 rods vertically1 spaced as shown on ,fig4 #a1 together with cross-diaphragms as indicated4 ,the caissons were reinforced for exterior pressures1 which were to be expected during the launching and towing into position1 and also for interior pressures1 which were to be expected at low tide1 when the water pressure would be nothing1 but the filling of the caissons would be effective4 ,the corners were reinforced and enlarged4 ,in order to secure a proper bedding into the sand foundation1 a #ab-;in4 lip was allowed to project all around the caisson below the bottom4 ,in the bottom there was cast a #c-;in4 hole1 and this was closed by a plug while the lower section was being towed into place4 ,the question of the effect of sea water on the concrete was given much thought4 ,the writer is unable to find any authoritative opinions on this subject which are not directly controverted by equally authoritative opinions of a diametrically opposite nature4 ,he thinks it is a question that this ,society might well undertake to investigate promptly and thoroughly4 ,there can be no question that there are many distressing instances of failures due to the action of sea water and frost on concrete1 and that many able and experienced engineers in charge of the engineering departments of the great transportation companies have simply crossed concrete off their list of available materials when it comes to marine construction4 ,it is a subject too large in itself to be discussed as subsidiary to a minor structure like the one herein described1 and though many have rejected concrete under these conditions1 other engineers equally conservative are using it freely and without fear4 ,the writer consulted with his partner and others at some length1 and1 considering all the advantages to accrue by the use of these concrete caissons1 decided to do so after taking all known precautions4 ,illustration3 ,,fig4 #a4 ,these precautions consisted in3 ,first1 the use of cement in which the chemical constituents were limited as follows3 ,it was specified that the cement should not contain more than #a4ge of anhydrous sulphuric acid 7,,so#c7 nor more than #c of magnesia 7,mg,o72 also that no addition greater than #c should have been made to the ingredients making up the cement subsequent to calcination4 ,secondly1 to secure by careful inspection the most completely homogeneous mixture possible1 with especial care in the density of the outer skin of the caissons4 ,thirdly1 a prolonged seasoning process before the new concrete should be immersed in the sea water4 ,in addition to these well-known precautions1 it was decided to try the addition to the cement of a chemical element that should make with the free lime in the cement a more stable and indissoluble chemical combination than is offered by the ordinary form of ,portland cement4 ,this was furnished by the patent compound known as ,toxement1 which is claimed by the inventor to be a resinate of calcium and silicate of alumina1 which generates a resinate of lime and a silicate of alumina in crystalline form4 ,it is further claimed that each of these materials is insoluble in sodium chloride and sodium sulphate1 #c solution4 ,it was used in all the caissons1 excepting ,nos4 #a and #b1 in the proportions of #b lb4 of ,toxement to each #ajj lb4 of cement4 ,the first two caissons were not thus treated1 and will be held under close observation and comparison with the others1 which were treated with this compound4 ,the mixture used was one of cement 7,pennsylvania brand71 two of sand1 and four of gravel4 ,the sand and gravel were from the nearby ,cow ,bay supply1 and screened and washed4 ,none of the gravel was larger than #a_/b in41 grading down from that to very coarse sand4 ,the sand was also run-of-bank1 and very well graded4 ,the caissons1 after being placed1 were filled with sand and gravel from the adjoining beach up to about mean high-water mark1 and the edges outside all around were protected from tidal and wave scour by rip-rap of one man stone4 ,the trusses were constructed on a radius of #cd ft41 with #h by #h-;in4 chords1 #f by #f-;in4 posts1 and #a-;in4 rods4 ,the loading was figured as a loaded coal cart plus #ajj lb4 per ft4 ,all lumber was clear yellow pine1 except the floor1 which was clear white oak4 ,the pipe rail and all bolts below the roadway level1 and thus subject to frequent wettings by salt water1 were of galvanized iron4 ,the trusses were set #i ft4 #i in4 apart on centers1 giving a clear opening of #h ft4 between the wheel guards under the hand-rails4 ,the fender piles were creosoted4 ,the float was #ah ft4 long and #ab ft4 wide4 ,a contract was let to the ,snare and ,triest ,company1 and work was commenced early in ,august1 #aiji4 ,the first caisson was poured early in ,september1 and the last about the beginning of ,october4 ,the caissons were all cast standing on parallel skids at about mean high water4 ,it was first intended to construct a small marine railroad and launch the caissons in that manner1 rolling them along the skids to the head of the marine railway4 ,this plan was abandoned1 however1 and by sending in at high tide a powerful derrick scow1 many of the caissons were lifted bodily from their position and set down in the water1 towed to place and sunk in position1 while the others1 mostly the upper sections1 were lifted to the deck of the scow and placed directly from there in their final position4 ,there was not much difficulty in getting them to settle down to a proper bearing4 ,provision had been made for jetting1 if necessary1 but it was not used4 ,in setting ,caisson ,no4 #b a nest of boulders was encountered1 and a diver was employed to clear away and level up the foundation4 ,the spacing was accomplished by a float consisting of two #ab by #ab-;in4 timbers1 latticed apart1 and of just sufficient length to cover the clear distance between the caissons4 ,the first caissons being properly set inshore1 the float was sent out1 guyed back to the shore1 and brought up against the outer edge of the set caisson4 ,the next caisson was then towed out1 set against the floating spacer1 and sunk in position4 ,there was some little trouble in plumbing the caissons1 but1 by excavating with an orange-peel bucket close to the high side and depositing the material against the low side1 they were all readily brought to a sufficiently vertical and level position to be unnoticed by sighting along the edge from the shore4 ,the trusses were all constructed in the contractor's yard at ,bridgeport1 and were towed across the ,sound on a scow4 ,they were set up and braced temporarily by the derrick boat1 and then the floor and deck were constructed in place4 ,on ,december #bfth1 #aiji1 a storm of unusual violence--unequaled in fact for many years--swept over the ,sound from the northeast2 the waves beat over the pier and broke loose some floor planks which had been only tacked in position1 but otherwise did no damage1 and did not shift the caissons in the least4 ,the same storm partly destroyed a pier of substantial construction less than a mile from the one in question4 ,unfortunately1 the work was let so late in the summer1 and the restrictions as to seasoning the concrete were enforced so rigidly1 that the work of setting the caissons could not be commenced until ,november #aath1 thus the entire construction was forced into the very bad weather of the late fall and early winter4 ,as this involved very rough water and much snow and wind1 the work was greatly delayed1 and was not completed until the middle of ,january4 ,the cost of the entire dock was about #ad1jjj4 ,the writer believes that the cost was much less than for masonry piers by any other method of construction1 under the existing circumstances of wind1 tide1 and exposure4 ,it would seem that for many highway bridges of short span1 causeways1 and similar structures1 the use of similar caissons would prove economical and permanent1 and that they might be used very largely to the exclusion of cribwork1 which1 after a decade or so1 becomes a source of constant maintenance charges1 besides never presenting an attractive appearance4 ,finally1 in bridges requiring the most rigid foundations1 these caissons might readily be used as substitutes for open wooden caissons1 sunk on a prepared foundation of whatever nature1 and still be capable of incorporation into the finished structure4 ,,discussion ,,william ,,arthur ,,payne1 ,m4 ,,am4 ,,soc4 ,c4 ,e4 7by letter74--,on the arrival of the first barge load of brick1 to be used in building a residence on the estate to which this pier belongs1 a severe northwest wind blew for two days1 after the boat was moored alongside1 directly against the head of the pier and the side of the boat4 ,the effect on the pier was to crush the fender piles and cause a settlement of one of the caissons at the pier head on the west end4 ,the caisson was knocked slightly out of alignment1 and a settlement toward the west was observable4 ,the writer believes that this was caused by the pounding of the brick barge on the sand bottom on which the caissons rest1 during half tide1 the boat being raised from the bottom on a roller1 and striking when the roller had passed4 ,in order to protect the pier and avoid the bumping of barges against it1 three groups of piles were driven about #h ft4 beyond the end1 a secondary platform was built between these and the stringer of the pier1 and arranged so that it would slide on the stringer in case of movement of the piles4 ,this secondary platform is particularly advantageous in the handling of material1 as the height of the dock was found to be excessive for passing up brick and cement4 ,for handling material after it is deposited on the dock1 an industrial railroad has been built4 ,at the shore end of this railroad1 brick and cement are dumped into wagons1 in which they are carried up the hill to the house4 ,,eugene ,,klapp1 ,m4 ,,am4 ,,soc4 ,c4 ,e4 7by letter74--,the injury done to the piers1 as reported by ,mr4 ,payne1 is not to be wondered at4 ,the pier was primarily built for a yacht landing1 and1 on account of the shoal water conditions1 excepting at extreme high tide1 it was mostly to be used by tenders and launches from larger yachts4 ,it was thought that at high water the large steam yachts might be able to come alongside4 ,provision was not made for tying up to the dock a heavily loaded brick scow and allowing it to remain there through rough weather4 ,the building of the secondary fender piles1 during the temporary use of the dock for unloading building material1 will doubtless prevent further damage4