,,less] ,,hippias by ,plato 7see ,app5dix ,i7 ,translat$ by ,b5jam9 ,j[ett ,,app5dix ,i4 ,x seems impossible to sep>ate by any exact l9e ! g5u9e writ+s ( ,plato f ! spuri\s4 ,! only ext]nal evid5ce to !m :i* is ( mu* value is t ( ,ari/otle2 = ! ,alex&rian catalogues ( a c5tury lat] include manife/ =g]ies4 ,ev5 ! value ( ! ,ari/otelian au?ority is a good deal impair$ by ! unc]ta9ty conc]n+ ! date & au?or%ip ( ! writ+s :i* are ascrib$ to him4 ,& sev]al ( ! citations ( ,ari/otle omit ! "n ( ,plato1 & "s ( !m omit ! "n ( ! dialogue f :i* !y are tak54 ,prior1 h[ev]1 to ! enquiry ab\t ! writ+s ( a p>ticul> au?or1 g5]al consid]ations :i* equally affect all evid5ce to ! g5u95ess ( anci5t writ+s are ! foll[+3 ,%ort] works are m likely to h be5 =g$1 or to h receiv$ an errone\s designation1 ?an long] ones2 & "s k9ds ( composition1 su* z epi/les or panegyrical orations1 are m liable to suspicion ?an o!rs2 ^?1 aga91 :i* h a ta/e ( sophi/ry 9 !m1 or ! r+ ( a lat] age1 or ! slight] "* ( a rhetorical ex]cise1 or 9 :i* a motive or "s aff9ity to spuri\s writ+s c be detect$1 or :i* seem to h orig9at$ 9 a "n or /atem5t really occurr+ 9 "s classical au?or1 are also ( d\btful cr$it2 :ile !re is no in/ance ( any anci5t writ+ prov$ to be a =g]y1 :i* comb9es excell5ce ) l5g?4 ,a really great & orig9al writ] w\ld h no object 9 fa!r+ 8 works on ,plato2 & to ! =g] or imitator1 ! 'lit]>y hack' ( ,alex&ria & ,a!ns1 ! ,gods did n grant orig9ality or g5ius4 ,fur!r1 9 attempt+ to balance ! evid5ce = & aga9/ a ,platonic dialogue1 we mu/ n =get t ! =m ( ! ,platonic writ+ 0 common to sev]al ( 8 contempor>ies4 ,aes*9es1 ,euclid1 ,pha$o1 ,anti/h5es1 & 9 ! next g5]ation ,ari/otle1 are all said to h compos$ dialogues2 & mi/akes ( names are v likely to h occurr$4 ,greek lit]ature 9 ! ?ird c5tury be=e ,*ri/ 0 almo/ z volum9\s z our own1 & )\t ! safegu>ds ( regul> publication1 or pr9t+1 or b9d+1 or ev5 ( di/9ct titles4 ,an unkn[n writ+ 0 naturally attribut$ to a kn[n writ] ^: works bore ! same "*2 & ! "n once app5d$ easily obta9$ au?ority4 ,a t5d5cy may also be obs]v$ to bl5d ! works & op9ions ( ! ma/] ) ^? ( 8 s*ol>s4 ,to a lat] ,platoni/1 ! diff]5ce betwe5 ,plato & 8 imitators 0 n s p]ceptible z to ourselves4 ,! ,memorabilia ( ,x5ophon & ! ,dialogues ( ,plato are b a "p ( a consid]able ,socratic lit]ature :i* has pass$ away4 ,& we mu/ consid] h[ we %\ld reg>d ! "q ( ! g5u95ess ( a p>ticul> writ+1 if ?is lo/ lit]ature _h be5 pres]v$ to u4 ,^! consid]ations lead u to adopt ! foll[+ crit]ia ( g5u95ess3 7#a7 ,t is mo/ c]ta9ly ,plato's :i* ,ari/otle attributes to him by "n1 :i* 7#b7 is ( consid]able l5g?1 ( 7#c7 great excell5ce1 & also 7#d7 9 h>mony ) ! g5]al _s ( ! ,platonic writ+s4 ,b ! te/imony ( ,ari/otle _c always be di/+ui%$ f t ( a lat] age 7see above72 & has v>i\s degrees ( importance4 ,^? writ+s :i* he cites )\t m5tion+ ,plato1 "u _! own names1 e4g4 ! ,hippias1 ! ,fun]al ,oration1 ! ,pha$o1 etc41 h an inf]ior degree ( evid5ce 9 _! fav\r4 ,!y may h be5 suppos$ by him to be ! writ+s ( ano!r1 al?\gh 9 ! case ( really great works1 e4g4 ! ,pha$o1 ?is is n cr$ible2 ^? aga9 :i* are quot$ b n nam$1 are /ill m defective 9 _! ext]nal cr$5tials4 ,!re may be also a possibility t ,ari/otle 0 mi/ak51 or may h confus$ ! ma/] & 8 s*ol>s 9 ! case ( a %ort writ+2 b ?is is inconceivable ab\t a m important "w1 e4g4 ! ,laws1 especially :5 we rememb] t he 0 liv+ at ,a!ns1 & a frequ5t] ( ! groves ( ! ,academy1 dur+ ! la/ tw5ty ye>s ( ,plato's life4 ,nor mu/ we =get t 9 all 8 num]\s citations f ! ,platonic writ+s he nev] attributes any passage f\nd 9 ! extant dialogues to any "o b ,plato4 ,& la/ly1 we may rem>k t "o or two great writ+s1 su* z ! ,p>m5ides & ! ,politicus1 :i* are :olly devoid ( ,ari/otelian 7#a7 cr$5tials may be fairly attribut$ to ,plato1 on ! gr\nd ( 7#b7 l5g?1 7#c7 excell5ce1 & 7#d7 accordance ) ! g5]al _s ( 8 writ+s4 ,inde$ ! great] "p ( ! evid5ce = ! g5u95ess ( anci5t ,greek au?ors may be summ$ up "u two heads only3 7#a7 excell5ce2 & 7#b7 uni=mity ( tradition--a k9d ( evid5ce1 :i* ?\gh 9 _m cases suffici5t1 is ( inf]ior value4 ,proce$+ ^u ^! pr9ciples we appe> to arrive at ! conclusion t n9ete5-tw5tie?s ( all ! writ+s :i* h ev] be5 ascrib$ to ,plato1 are und\bt$ly g5u9e4 ,!re is ano!r portion ( !m1 includ+ ! ,epi/les1 ! ,ep9omis1 ! dialogues reject$ by ! anci5ts !mselves1 namely1 ! ,axio*us1 ,de ju/o1 ,de virtute1 ,demodocus1 ,sisyphus1 ,eryxias1 :i* on gr\nds1 bo? ( int]nal & ext]nal evid5ce1 we are able ) equal c]ta9ty to reject4 ,b !re /ill rema9s a small portion ( :i* we are unable to affirm ei!r t !y are g5u9e or spuri\s4 ,!y may h be5 writt5 9 y\?1 or possibly l ! works ( "s pa9t]s1 may be p>tly or :olly ! compositions ( pupils2 or !y may h be5 ! writ+s ( "s contempor>y transf]r$ by accid5t to ! m celebrat$ "n ( ,plato1 or ( "s ,platoni/ 9 ! next g5]ation :o aspir$ to imitate 8 ma/]4 ,n t on gr\nds ei!r ( language or philosophy we %\ld lightly reject !m4 ,"s diff]5ce ( /yle1 or inf]iority ( execution1 or inconsi/5cy ( ?\ght1 c h>dly be consid]$ decisive ( _! spuri\s "*4 ,= :o always does ju/ice to himself1 or :o writes ) equal c>e at all times8 ,c]ta9ly n ,plato1 :o exhibits ! greate/ diff]5ces 9 dramatic p[]1 9 ! =mation ( s5t5ces1 & 9 ! use ( words1 if 8 e>li] writ+s are comp>$ ) 8 lat] ones1 say ! ,protagoras or ,pha$rus ) ! ,laws4 ,or :o c be expect$ to ?9k 9 ! same mann] dur+ a p]iod ( au?or%ip ext5d+ ov] above fifty ye>s1 9 an age ( great intellectual activity1 z well z ( political & lit]>y transition8 ,c]ta9ly n ,plato1 ^: e>li] writ+s are sep>at$ f 8 lat] ones by z wide an int]val ( philosophical speculation z t :i* sep>ates 8 lat] writ+s f ,ari/otle4 ,! dialogues :i* h be5 translat$ 9 ! fir/ ,app5dix1 & :i* appe> to h ! next claim to g5u95ess among ! ,platonic writ+s1 are ! ,less] ,hippias1 ! ,m5ex5us or ,fun]al ,oration1 ! ,fir/ ,alcibiades4 ,( ^!1 ! ,less] ,hippias & ! ,fun]al ,oration are cit$ by ,ari/otle2 ! fir/ 9 ! ,metaphysics1 ! latt] 9 ! ,rhetoric4 ,nei!r ( !m are expressly attribut$ to ,plato1 b 9 8 citation ( bo? ( !m he seems to be ref]r+ to passages 9 ! extant dialogues4 ,f ! m5tion ( ',hippias' 9 ! s+ul> by ,ari/otle1 we may p]haps inf] t he 0 unacqua9t$ ) a second dialogue be>+ ! same "n4 ,moreov]1 ! m]e exi/5ce ( a ,great] & ,less] ,hippias1 & ( a ,fir/ & ,second ,alcibiades1 does to a c]ta9 ext5t ?r[ a d\bt ^u bo? ( !m4 ,?\gh a v clev] & +5i\s "w1 ! ,less] ,hippias does n appe> to conta9 any?+ beyond ! p[] ( an imitator1 :o 0 also a c>eful /ud5t ( ! e>li] ,platonic writ+s1 to inv5t4 ,! motive or lead+ ?\ght ( ! dialogue may be detect$ 9 ,x54 ,mem41 & !re is no simil> in/ance ( a 'motive' :i* is tak5 f ,x5ophon 9 an und\bt$ dialogue ( ,plato4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ! uphold]s ( ! g5u95ess ( ! dialogue w f9d 9 ! ,hippias a true ,socratic _s2 !y w comp>e ! ,ion z be+ ak9 bo? 9 subject & treatm5t2 !y w urge ! au?ority ( ,ari/otle2 & !y w detect 9 ! treatm5t ( ! ,sophi/1 9 ! satirical reason+ ^u ,hom]1 9 ! r$uctio ad absurdum ( ! doctr9e t vice is ignorance1 traces ( a ,platonic au?or%ip4 ,9 ref]5ce to ! la/ po9t we are d\btful1 z 9 "s ( ! o!r dialogues1 :e!r ! au?or is ass]t+ or ov]?r[+ ! p>adox ( ,socrates1 or m]ely foll[+ ! argum5t ':i!r ! w9d bl[s4' ,t no conclusion is arriv$ at is also 9 accordance ) ! "* ( ! e>li] dialogues4 ,! resemblances or imitations ( ! ,gorgias1 ,protagoras1 & ,eu?ydemus1 :i* h be5 obs]v$ 9 ! ,hippias1 _c ) c]ta9ty be adduc$ on ei!r side ( ! argum5t4 ,on ! :ole1 m may be said 9 fav\r ( ! g5u95ess ( ! ,hippias ?an aga9/ x4 ,! ,m5ex5us or ,fun]al ,oration is cit$ by ,ari/otle1 & is int]e/+ z supply+ an example ( ! mann] 9 :i* ! orators prais$ '! ,a!nians among ! ,a!nians1' falsify+ p]sons & dates1 & ca/+ a veil ov] ! gloomi] ev5ts ( ,a!nian hi/ory4 ,x exhibits an acqua9tance ) ! fun]al oration ( ,?ucydides1 & 01 p]haps1 int5d$ to rival t great "w4 ,if g5u9e1 ! prop] place ( ! ,m5ex5us w\ld be at ! end ( ! ,pha$rus4 ,! satirical op5+ & ! conclud+ words be> a great resemblance to ! e>li] dialogues2 ! oration itself is pr(ess$ly a mimetic "w1 l ! spee*es 9 ! ,pha$rus1 & _c !re=e be te/$ by a comp>ison ( ! o!r writ+s ( ,plato4 ,! fun]al oration ( ,p]icles is expressly m5tion$ 9 ! ,pha$rus1 & ?is may h sugge/$ ! subject1 9 ! same mann] t ! ,cleitophon appe>s to be sugge/$ by ! slight m5tion ( ,cleitophon & 8 atta*m5t to ,?rasyma*us 9 ! ,republic2 & ! ,!ages by ! m5tion ( ,!ages 9 ! ,apology & ,republic2 or z ! ,second ,alcibiades seems to be f\nd$ ^u ! text ( ,x5ophon1 ,mem4 ,a simil> ta/e = p>ody appe>s n only 9 ! ,pha$rus1 b 9 ! ,protagoras1 9 ! ,symposium1 & to a c]ta9 ext5t 9 ! ,p>m5ides4 ,to ^! two d\btful writ+s ( ,plato ,i h add$ ! ,fir/ ,alcibiades1 :i*1 ( all ! disput$ dialogues ( ,plato1 has ! greate/ m]it1 & is some:at long] ?an any ( !m1 ?\gh n v]ifi$ by ! te/imony ( ,ari/otle1 & 9 _m respects at v>iance ) ! ,symposium 9 ! description ( ! relations ( ,socrates & ,alcibiades4 ,l ! ,less] ,hippias & ! ,m5ex5us1 x is to be comp>$ to ! e>li] writ+s ( ,plato4 ,! motive ( ! piece may1 p]haps1 be f\nd 9 t passage ( ! ,symposium 9 :i* ,alcibiades describes himself z self-convict$ by ! words ( ,socrates4 ,= ! disp>ag+ mann] 9 :i* ,s*lei]ma*] has spok5 ( ?is dialogue !re seems to be no suffici5t f\ndation4 ,at ! same "t1 ! lesson imp>t$ is simple1 & ! irony m transp>5t ?an 9 ! und\bt$ dialogues ( ,plato4 ,we "k1 too1 t ,alcibiades 0 a fav\rite !sis1 & t at lea/ five or six dialogues be>+ ?is "n pass$ curr5t 9 antiquity1 & are attribut$ to contempor>ies ( ,socrates & ,plato4 7#a7 ,9 ! entire abs5ce ( real ext]nal evid5ce 7= ! catalogues ( ! ,alex&rian libr>ians _c be reg>d$ z tru/wor?y72 & 7#b7 9 ! abs5ce ( ! highe/ m>ks ei!r ( poetical or philosophical excell5ce2 & 7#c7 consid]+ t we h express te/imony to ! exi/5ce ( contempor>y writ+s be>+ ! "n ( ,alcibiades1 we are compell$ to susp5d our judgm5t on ! g5u95ess ( ! extant dialogue4 ,nei!r at ?is po9t1 nor at any o!r1 d we propose to draw an absolute l9e ( dem>cation betwe5 g5u9e & spuri\s writ+s ( ,plato4 ,!y fade (f imp]ceptibly f "o class to ano!r4 ,!re may h be5 degrees ( g5u95ess 9 ! dialogues !mselves1 z !re are c]ta9ly degrees ( evid5ce by :i* !y are support$4 ,! traditions ( ! oral disc\rses bo? ( ,socrates & ,plato may h =m$ ! basis ( semi-,platonic writ+s2 "s ( !m may be ( ! same mix$ "* :i* is app>5t 9 ,ari/otle & ,hippocrates1 al?\gh ! =m ( !m is diff]5t4 ,b ! writ+s ( ,plato1 unlike ! writ+s ( ,ari/otle1 seem nev] to h be5 confus$ ) ! writ+s ( 8 disciples3 ?is 0 probably due to _! def9ite =m1 & to _! inimitable excell5ce4 ,! ?ree dialogues :i* we h (f]$ 9 ! ,app5dix to ! criticism ( ! read] may be p>tly spuri\s & p>tly g5u9e2 !y may be altoge!r spuri\s2--t is an alt]native :i* mu/ be frankly admitt$4 ,nor c we ma9ta9 ( "s o!r dialogues1 su* z ! ,p>m5ides1 & ! ,sophi/1 & ,politicus1 t no consid]able objection c be urg$ aga9/ !m1 ?\gh greatly ov]balanc$ by ! weight 7*iefly7 ( int]nal evid5ce 9 _! fav\r4 ,nor1 on ! o!r h&1 c we exclude a b>e possibility t "s dialogues :i* are usually reject$1 su* z ! ,great] ,hippias & ! ,cleitophon1 may be g5u9e4 ,! nature & object ( ^! semi-,platonic writ+s require m c>eful /udy & m comp>ison ( !m ) "o ano!r1 & ) =g$ writ+s 9 g5]al1 ?an !y h yet receiv$1 be=e we c f9ally decide on _! "*4 ,we d n consid] !m all z g5u9e until !y c be prov$ to be spuri\s1 z is (t5 ma9ta9$ & /ill m (t5 impli$ 9 ?is & simil> discussions2 b %\ld say ( "s ( !m1 t _! g5u95ess is nei!r prov5 nor disprov5 until fur!r evid5ce ab\t !m c be adduc$4 ,& we are z confid5t t ! ,epi/les are spuri\s1 z t ! ,republic1 ! ,timaeus1 & ! ,laws are g5u9e4 ,on ! :ole1 n a tw5tie? "p ( ! writ+s :i* pass "u ! "n ( ,plato1 if we exclude ! works reject$ by ! anci5ts !mselves & two or ?ree o!r plausible inv5tions1 c be fairly d\bt$ by ^? :o are will+ to all[ t a consid]able *ange & gr[? may h tak5 place 9 8 philosophy 7see above74 ,t tw5tie? debatable portion sc>cely 9 any degree affects our judgm5t ( ,plato1 ei!r z a ?9k] or a writ]1 & ?\gh sugge/+ "s int]e/+ que/ions to ! s*ol> & critic1 is ( little importance to ! g5]al read]4 ,,less] ,,hippias ,,introduction4 ,! ,less] ,hippias may be comp>$ ) ! e>li] dialogues ( ,plato1 9 :i* ! contra/ ( ,socrates & ! ,sophi/s is mo/ /rongly exhibit$4 ,hippias1 l ,protagoras & ,gorgias1 ?\gh civil1 is va9 & boa/ful3 he kn[s all ?+s2 he c make any?+1 includ+ 8 own clo!s2 he is a manufactur] ( poems & declamations1 & also ( seal-r+s1 %oes1 /rigils2 8 girdle1 :i* he has wov5 himself1 is ( a f9] ?an ,p]sian quality4 ,he is a va9]1 light] nature ?an ! two great ,sophi/s 7comp>e ,protag471 b ( ! same "* ) !m1 & equally impati5t ( ! %ort cut-&-?ru/ me?od ( ,socrates1 :om he endeav\rs to draw into a long oration4 ,at la/1 he gets tir$ ( be+ defeat$ at e po9t by ,socrates1 & is ) difficulty induc$ to proce$ 7comp>e ,?rasyma*us1 ,protagoras1 ,callicles1 & o!rs1 to :om ! same reluctance is ascrib$74 ,hippias l ,protagoras has common s5se on 8 side1 :5 he argues1 cit+ passages ( ! ,iliad 9 support ( 8 view1 t ,hom] int5d$ ,a*illes to be ! brave/1 ,odysseus ! wise/ ( ! ,greeks4 ,b he is easily ov]?r[n by ! sup]ior dialectics ( ,socrates1 :o pret5ds to %[ t ,a*illes is n true to 8 ^w1 & t no simil> inconsi/5cy is to be f\nd 9 ,odysseus4 ,hippias replies t ,a*illes un9t5tionally1 b ,odysseus int5tionally1 speaks falsehood4 ,b is x bett] to d wrong int5tionally or un9t5tionally8 ,socrates1 rely+ on ! analogy ( ! arts1 ma9ta9s ! =m]1 ,hippias ! latt] ( ! two alt]natives444,all ?is is q conceiv$ 9 ! _s ( ,plato1 :o is v f> f mak+ ,socrates always argue on ! side ( tru?4 ,! ov]-reason+ on ,hom]1 :i* is ( c\rse satirical1 is also 9 ! _s ( ,plato4 ,poetry turn$ logic is ev5 m ridicul\s ?an 'rhetoric turn$ logic1' & equally fallaci\s4 ,!re 7 reason]s 9 anci5t z well z 9 mod]n times1 :o c\ld nev] receive ! natural impression ( ,hom]1 or ( any o!r book :i* !y read4 ,! argum5t ( ,socrates1 9 :i* he picks out ! app>5t inconsi/5cies & discrepancies 9 ! spee* & actions ( ,a*illes1 & ! f9al p>adox1 't he :o is true is also false1' rem9d u ( ! int]pretation by ,socrates ( ,simonides 9 ! ,protagoras1 & ( simil> reason+s 9 ! fir/ book ( ! ,republic4 ,! discrepancies :i* ,socrates discov]s 9 ! words ( ,a*illes are p]haps z great z ^? discov]$ by "s ( ! mod]n sep>ati/s ( ! ,hom]ic poems444 ,at la/1 ,socrates hav+ caught ,hippias 9 ! toils ( ! volunt>y & involunt>y1 is oblig$ to confess t he is w&]+ ab\t 9 ! same labyr9?2 he makes ! reflection on himself :i* o!rs w\ld make ^u him 7comp>e ,protagoras74 ,he does n wond] t he %\ld be 9 a difficulty1 b he wond]s at ,hippias1 & he becomes s5sible ( ! gravity ( ! situation1 :5 ord9>y m5 l himself c no long] g to ! wise & be taught by !m4 ,x may be rem>k$ z be>+ on ! g5u95ess ( ?is dialogue3 7#a7 t ! mann]s ( ! speak]s are less subtle & ref9$ ?an 9 ! o!r dialogues ( ,plato2 7#b7 t ! sophi/ry ( ,socrates is m palpable & unblu%+1 & also m unmean+2 7#c7 t _m turns ( ?\ght & /yle are f\nd 9 x :i* appe> also 9 ! o!r dialogues3--:e!r resemblances ( ?is k9d tell 9 fav\r ( or aga9/ ! g5u95ess ( an anci5t writ+1 is an important "q :i* w h to be answ]$ diff]5tly 9 diff]5t cases4 ,= t a writ] may repeat himself is z true z t a =g] may imitate2 & ,plato else:]e1 ei!r ( set purpose or f =getfulness1 is full ( repetitions4 ,! p>allelisms ( ! ,less] ,hippias1 z already rem>k$1 are n ( ! k9d :i* necess>ily imply t ! dialogue is ! "w ( a =g]4 ,! p>allelisms ( ! ,great] ,hippias ) ! o!r dialogues1 & ! allusion to ! ,less] 7:]e ,hippias sket*es ! programme ( 8 next lecture1 & invites ,socrates to att5d & br+ any fri5ds ) him :o may be compet5t judges71 are m ?an suspici\s3--!y are ( a v poor sort1 su* z we _c suppose to h be5 due to ,plato himself4 ,! ,great] ,hippias m resembles ! ,eu?ydemus ?an any o!r dialogue2 b is immeasurably inf]ior to x4 ,! ,less] ,hippias seems to h m m]it ?an ! ,great]1 & to be m ,platonic 9 _s4 ,! "* ( ,hippias is ! same 9 bo? dialogues1 b 8 vanity & boa/+ are ev5 m exagg]at$ 9 ! ,great] ,hippias4 ,8 art ( memory is specially m5tion$ 9 bo?4 ,he is an inf]ior type ( ! same species z ,hippodamus ( ,miletus 7,ari/4 ,pol474 ,"s passages 9 :i* ! ,less] ,hippias may be advantage\sly comp>$ ) ! und\bt$ly g5u9e dialogues ( ,plato are ! foll[+3--,less4 ,hipp43 comp>e ,republic 7,socrates' cunn+ 9 argum5t73 comp>e ,la*es 7,socrates' feel+ ab\t argum5ts73 comp>e ,republic 7,socrates n un?ankful73 comp>e ,republic 7,socrates di%one/ 9 argum5t74 ,! ,less] ,hippias1 ?\gh inf]ior to ! o!r dialogues1 may be reasonably believ$ to h be5 writt5 by ,plato1 on ! gr\nd 7#a7 ( consid]able excell5ce2 7#b7 ( uni=m tradition beg9n+ ) ,ari/otle & 8 s*ool4 ,t ! dialogue falls bel[ ! /&>d ( ,plato's o!r works1 or t he has attribut$ to ,socrates an unmean+ p>adox 7p]haps ) ! view ( %[+ t he c\ld beat ! ,sophi/s at _! own weapons2 or t he c\ld 'make ! worse appe> ! bett] cause'2 or m]ely z a dialectical exp]im5t7--are n suffici5t reasons = d\bt+ ! g5u95ess ( ! "w4 ,,p]sons ,,( ,,! ,,dialogue3 ,eudicus1 ,socrates1 ,hippias4 ,,eudicus3 ,:y are y sil5t1 ,socrates1 aft] ! magnific5t display :i* ,hippias has be5 mak+8 ,:y d y n ei!r refute 8 words1 if he seems to y to h be5 wrong 9 any po9t1 or jo9 ) u 9 comm5d+ him8 ,!re is ! m reason :y y %\ld speak1 because we are n[ alone1 & ! audi5ce is conf9$ to ^? :o may fairly claim to take "p 9 a philosophical discussion4 ,,socrates3 ,i %\ld greatly l1 ,eudicus1 to ask ,hippias ! mean+ ( :at he 0 say+ j n[ ab\t ,hom]4 ,i h he>d y\r fa!r1 ,apemantus1 decl>e t ! ,iliad ( ,hom] is a f9] poem ?an ! ,odyssey 9 ! same degree t ,a*illes 0 a bett] man ?an ,odysseus2 ,odysseus1 he w\ld say1 is ! c5tral figure ( ! "o poem & ,a*illes ( ! o!r4 ,n[1 ,i %\ld l to "k1 if ,hippias has no objection to tell me1 :at he ?9ks ab\t ^! two h]oes1 & :i* ( !m he ma9ta9s to be ! bett]2 he has already told u 9 ! c\rse ( 8 exhibition _m ?+s ( v>i\s k9ds ab\t ,hom] & div]s o!r poets4 ,,eudicus3 ,i am sure t ,hippias w be delight$ to answ] any?+ :i* y w\ld l to ask2 tell me1 ,hippias1 if ,socrates asks y a "q1 w y answ] him8 ,,hippias3 ,inde$1 ,eudicus1 ,i %\ld be /rangely inconsi/5t if ,i refus$ to answ] ,socrates1 :5 at ea* ,olympic fe/ival1 z ,i w5t up f my h\se at ,elis to ! temple ( ,olympia1 :]e all ! ,hell5es 7 assembl$1 ,i cont9ually pr(ess$ my will+ness to p]=m any ( ! exhibitions :i* ,i _h prep>$1 & to answ] any que/ions :i* any "o _h to ask4 ,,socrates3 ,truly1 ,hippias1 y are to be congratulat$1 if at e ,olympic fe/ival y h su* an enc\rag+ op9ion ( y\r own wisdom :5 y g up to ! temple4 ,i d\bt :e!r any muscul> h]o w\ld be s fe>less & confid5t 9 (f]+ 8 body to ! combat at ,olympia1 z y are 9 (f]+ y\r m9d4 ,,hippias3 ,& ) good reason1 ,socrates2 = s9ce ! day :5 ,i fir/ ent]$ ! li/s at ,olympia ,i h nev] f\nd any man :o 0 my sup]ior 9 any?+4 7,comp>e ,gorgias47 ,,socrates3 ,:at an ornam5t1 ,hippias1 w ! reputation ( y\r wisdom be to ! city ( ,elis & to y\r p>5ts6 ,b to return3 :at say y ( ,odysseus & ,a*illes8 ,:i* is ! bett] ( ! two8 & 9 :at p>ticul> does ei!r surpass ! o!r8 ,= :5 y 7 exhibit+ & !re 0 company 9 ! room1 ?\gh ,i c\ld n foll[ y1 ,i did n l to ask :at y meant1 because a cr[d ( p 7 pres5t1 & ,i 0 afraid t ! "q might int]rupt y\r exhibition4 ,b n[ t !re are n s _m ( u1 & my fri5d ,eudicus bids me ask1 ,i wi% y w\ld tell me :at y 7 say+ ab\t ^! two h]oes1 s t ,i may cle>ly und]/&2 h[ did y di/+ui% !m8 ,,hippias3 ,i %all h mu* pleasure1 ,socrates1 9 expla9+ to y m cle>ly ?an ,i c\ld 9 public my views ab\t ^! & also ab\t o!r h]oes4 ,i say t ,hom] int5d$ ,a*illes to be ! brave/ ( ! m5 :o w5t to ,troy1 ,ne/or ! wise/1 & ,odysseus ! wilie/4 ,,socrates3 ,o r>e ,hippias1 w y be s good z n to laugh1 if ,i f9d a difficulty 9 foll[+ y1 & repeat my que/ions sev]al times ov]8 ,please to answ] me k9dly & g5tly4 ,,hippias3 ,i %\ld be greatly a%am$ ( myself1 ,socrates1 if ,i1 :o tea* o!rs & take money ( !m1 c\ld n1 :5 ,i 0 ask$ by y1 answ] 9 a civil & agreeable mann]4 ,,socrates3 ,?ank y3 ! fact is1 t ,i seem$ to und]/& :at y meant :5 y said t ! poet int5d$ ,a*illes to be ! brave/ ( m51 & also t he int5d$ ,ne/or to be ! wise/2 b :5 y said t he meant ,odysseus to be ! wilie/1 ,i mu/ confess t ,i c\ld n und]/& :at y 7 say+4 ,w y tell me1 & !n ,i %all p]haps und]/& y bett]2 has n ,hom] made ,a*illes wily8 ,,hippias3 ,c]ta9ly n1 ,socrates2 he is ! mo/ /raight-=w>d ( mank9d1 & :5 ,hom] introduces !m talk+ ) "o ano!r 9 ! passage call$ ! ,pray]s1 ,a*illes is suppos$ by ! poet to say to ,odysseus3-- ',son ( ,la]tes1 sprung f heav51 crafty ,odysseus1 ,i w speak out pla9ly ! ^w :i* ,i int5d to c>ry out 9 act1 & :i* w1 ,i believe1 be accompli%$4 ,= ,i hate him l ! gates ( dea? :o ?9ks "o ?+ & says ano!r4 ,b ,i w speak t :i* %all be accompli%$4' ,n[1 9 ^! v]ses he cle>ly indicates ! "* ( ! two m52 he %[s ,a*illes to be true & simple1 & ,odysseus to be wily & false2 = he supposes ,a*illes to be address+ ,odysseus 9 ^! l9es4 ,,socrates3 ,n[1 ,hippias1 ,i ?9k t ,i und]/& y\r mean+2 :5 y say t ,odysseus is wily1 y cle>ly mean t he is false8 ,,hippias3 ,exactly s1 ,socrates2 x is ! "* ( ,odysseus1 z he is repres5t$ by ,hom] 9 _m passages bo? ( ! ,iliad & ,odyssey4 ,,socrates3 ,& ,hom] mu/ be presum$ to h meant t ! true man is n ! same z ! false8 ,,hippias3 ,( c\rse1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,& is t y\r own op9ion1 ,hippias8 ,,hippias3 ,c]ta9ly2 h[ c ,i h any o!r8 ,,socrates3 ,well1 !n1 z !re is no possibility ( ask+ ,hom] :at he meant 9 ^! v]ses ( 81 let u leave him2 b z y %[ a will+ness to take up 8 cause1 & y\r op9ion agrees ) :at y decl>e to be 81 w y answ] on behalf ( y\rself & him8 ,,hippias3 ,i w2 ask %ortly any?+ :i* y l4 ,,socrates3 ,d y say t ! false1 l ! sick1 h no p[] to d ?+s1 or t !y h ! p[] to d ?+s8 ,,hippias3 ,i %\ld say t !y h p[] to d _m ?+s1 & 9 p>ticul> to deceive mank9d4 ,,socrates3 ,!n1 accord+ to y1 !y are bo? p[]ful & wily1 are !y n8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& are !y wily1 & d !y deceive by reason ( _! simplicity & folly1 or by reason ( _! cunn+ & a c]ta9 sort ( prud5ce8 ,,hippias3 ,by reason ( _! cunn+ & prud5ce1 mo/ c]ta9ly4 ,,socrates3 ,!n !y are prud5t1 ,i suppose8 ,,hippias3 ,s !y are--v4 ,,socrates3 ,& if !y are prud5t1 d !y "k or d !y n "k :at !y d8 ,,hippias3 ,( c\rse1 !y "k v well2 & t is :y !y d mis*ief to o!rs4 ,,socrates3 ,& hav+ ?is k1 are !y ignorant1 or are !y wise8 ,,hippias3 ,wise1 c]ta9ly2 at lea/1 9 s f> z !y c deceive4 ,,socrates3 ,/op1 & let u recall to m9d :at y are say+2 are y n say+ t ! false are p[]ful & prud5t & kn[+ & wise 9 ^? ?+s ab\t :i* !y are false8 ,,hippias3 ,to be sure4 ,,socrates3 ,& ! true diff] f ! false--! true & ! false are ! v opposite ( ea* o!r8 ,,hippias3 ,t is my view4 ,,socrates3 ,!n1 accord+ to y\r view1 x w\ld seem t ! false are to be rank$ 9 ! class ( ! p[]ful & wise8 ,,hippias3 ,assur$ly4 ,,socrates3 ,& :5 y say t ! false are p[]ful & wise 9 s f> z !y are false1 d y mean t !y h or h n ! p[] ( utt]+ _! falsehoods if !y l8 ,,hippias3 ,i mean to say t !y h ! p[]4 ,,socrates3 ,9 a ^w1 !n1 ! false are !y :o are wise & h ! p[] to speak falsely8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,!n a man :o has n ! p[] ( speak+ falsely & is ignorant _c be false8 ,,hippias3 ,y are "r4 ,,socrates3 ,& e man has p[] :o does t :i* he wi%es at ! "t :5 he wi%es4 ,i am n speak+ ( any special case 9 :i* he is prev5t$ by disease or some?+ ( t sort1 b ,i am speak+ g5]ally1 z ,i might say ( y1 t y are able to write my "n :5 y l4 ,w\ld y n call a man able :o c\ld d t8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& tell me1 ,hippias1 are y n a skilful calculator & ari?metician8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 ,socrates1 assur$ly ,i am4 ,,socrates3 ,& if "s "o 7 to ask y :at is ! sum ( #c multipli$ by #gjj1 y w\ld tell him ! true answ] 9 a mom5t1 if y pleas$8 ,,hippias3 c]ta9ly ,i %\ld4 ,,socrates3 ,is n t because y are ! wise/ & able/ ( m5 9 ^! matt]s8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& be+ z y are ! wise/ & able/ ( m5 9 ^! matt]s ( calculation1 are y n also ! be/8 ,,hippias3 ,to be sure1 ,socrates1 ,i am ! be/4 ,,socrates3 ,& !re=e y w\ld be ! mo/ able to tell ! tru? ab\t ^! matt]s1 w\ld y n8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 ,i %\ld4 ,,socrates3 ,& c\ld y speak falsehoods ab\t !m equally well8 ,i mu/ beg1 ,hippias1 t y w answ] me ) ! same frankness & magnanimity :i* has hi!rto *>act]iz$ y4 ,if a p]son 7 to ask y :at is ! sum ( #c multipli$ by #gjj1 w\ld n y be ! be/ & mo/ consi/5t tell] ( a falsehood1 hav+ always ! p[] ( speak+ falsely z y h ( speak+ truly1 ab\t ^! same matt]s1 if y want$ to tell a falsehood1 & n to answ] truly8 ,w\ld ! ignorant man be bett] able to tell a falsehood 9 matt]s ( calculation ?an y w\ld be1 if y *ose8 ,might he n sometimes /umble ^u ! tru?1 :5 he want$ to tell a lie1 because he did n "k1 :]eas y :o are ! wise man1 if y want$ to tell a lie w\ld always & consi/5tly lie8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 !re y are q "r4 ,,socrates3 ,does ! false man tell lies ab\t o!r ?+s1 b n ab\t numb]1 or :5 he is mak+ a calculation8 ,,hippias3 ,to be sure2 he w\ld tell z _m lies ab\t numb] z ab\t o!r ?+s4 ,,socrates3 ,!n may we fur!r assume1 ,hippias1 t !re are m5 :o are false ab\t calculation & numb]8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,:o c !y be8 ,= y h already admitt$ t he :o is false mu/ h ! ability to be false3 y said1 z y w rememb]1 t he :o is unable to be false w n be false8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 ,i rememb]2 x 0 s said4 ,,socrates3 ,& 7 y n y\rself j n[ %[n to be be/ able to speak falsely ab\t calculation8 ,,hippias3 ,yes2 t 0 ano!r ?+ :i* 0 said4 ,,socrates3 ,& are y n likewise said to speak truly ab\t calculation8 ,,hippias3 ,c]ta9ly4 ,,socrates3 ,!n ! same p]son is able to speak bo? falsely & truly ab\t calculation8 ,& t p]son is he :o is good at calculation--! ari?metician8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,:o1 !n1 ,hippias1 is discov]$ to be false at calculation8 ,is he n ! good man8 ,= ! good man is ! able man1 & he is ! true man4 ,,hippias3 ,t is evid5t4 ,,socrates3 ,d y n see1 !n1 t ! same man is false & also true ab\t ! same matt]s8 ,& ! true man is n a :it bett] ?an ! false2 = inde$ he is ! same ) him & n ! v opposite1 z y 7 j n[ imag9+4 ,,hippias3 ,n 9 t in/ance1 cle>ly4 ,,socrates3 ,%all we exam9e o!r in/ances8 ,,hippias3 ,c]ta9ly1 if y are dispos$4 ,,socrates3 ,are y n also skill$ 9 geometry8 ,,hippias3 ,i am4 ,,socrates3 ,well1 & does n ! same hold 9 t sci5ce also8 ,is n ! same p]son be/ able to speak falsely or to speak truly ab\t diagrams2 & he is--! geometrician8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,he & no "o else is good at x8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 he & no "o else4 ,,socrates3 ,!n ! good & wise geomet] has ?is d\ble p[] 9 ! highe/ degree2 & if !re be a man :o is false ab\t diagrams ! good man w be he1 = he is able to be false2 :]eas ! bad is unable1 & = ?is reason is n false1 z has be5 admitt$4 ,,hippias3 ,true4 ,,socrates3 ,once m--let u exam9e a ?ird case2 t ( ! a/ronom]1 9 ^: art1 aga91 y1 ,hippias1 pr(ess to be a /ill great] pr(ici5t ?an 9 ! prec$+--d y n8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 ,i am4 ,,socrates3 ,& does n ! same hold ( a/ronomy8 ,,hippias3 ,true1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,& 9 a/ronomy1 too1 if any man be able to speak falsely he w be ! good a/ronom]1 b he :o is n able w n speak falsely1 = he has no k4 ,,hippias3 ,cle>ly n4 ,,socrates3 ,!n 9 a/ronomy also1 ! same man w be true & false8 ,,hippias3 ,x w\ld seem s4 ,,socrates3 ,& n[1 ,hippias1 consid] ! "q at l>ge ab\t all ! sci5ces1 & see :e!r ! same pr9ciple does n always hold4 ,i "k t 9 mo/ arts y are ! wise/ ( m51 z ,i h he>d y boa/+ 9 ! agora at ! tables ( ! money-*ang]s1 :5 y 7 sett+ =? ! great & enviable /ores ( y\r wisdom2 & y said t ^u "o occasion1 :5 y w5t to ! ,olympic games1 all t y _h on y\r p]son 0 made by y\rself4 ,y began ) y\r r+1 :i* 0 ( y\r own workman%ip1 & y said t y c\ld engrave r+s2 & y _h ano!r seal :i* 0 also ( y\r own workman%ip1 & a /rigil & an oil flask1 :i* y _h made y\rself2 y said also t y _h made ! %oes :i* y _h on y\r feet1 & ! cloak & ! %ort tunic2 b :at appe>$ to u all mo/ extraord9>y & a pro( ( s+ul> art1 0 ! girdle ( y\r tunic1 :i*1 y said1 0 z f9e z ! mo/ co/ly ,p]sian fabric1 & ( y\r own weav+2 moreov]1 y told u t y _h br\ght ) y poems1 epic1 tragic1 & di?yrambic1 z well z prose writ+s ( ! mo/ v>i\s k9ds2 & y said t y\r skill 0 also pre-em95t 9 ! arts :i* ,i 0 j n[ m5tion+1 & 9 ! true pr9ciples ( rhy?m & h>mony & ( or?ography2 & if ,i rememb] rightly1 !re 7 a great _m o!r accompli%m5ts 9 :i* y excell$4 ,i h =gott5 to m5tion y\r art ( memory1 :i* y reg>d z y\r special glory1 & ,i d>e say t ,i h =gott5 _m o!r ?+s2 b1 z ,i 0 say+1 only look to y\r own arts--& !re are pl5ty ( !m--& to ^? ( o!rs2 & tell me1 hav+ reg>d to ! admissions :i* y & ,i h made1 :e!r y discov] any dep>tm5t ( art or any description ( wisdom or cunn+1 :i*ev] "n y use1 9 :i* ! true & false are diff]5t & n ! same3 tell me1 if y c1 ( any4 ,b y _c4 ,,hippias3 ,n )\t consid]ation1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,nor w consid]ation help y1 ,hippias1 z ,i believe2 b !n if ,i am "r1 rememb] :at ! consequ5ce w be4 ,,hippias3 ,i d n "k :at y mean1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,i suppose t y are n us+ y\r art ( memory1 d\btless because y ?9k t su* an accompli%m5t is n ne$$ on ! pres5t occasion4 ,i w !re=e rem9d y ( :at y 7 say+3 7 y n say+ t ,a*illes 0 a true man1 & ,odysseus false & wily8 ,,hippias3 ,i 04 ,,socrates3 ,& n[ d y p]ceive t ! same p]son has turn$ out to be false z well z true8 ,if ,odysseus is false he is also true1 & if ,a*illes is true he is also false1 & s ! two m5 are n oppos$ to "o ano!r1 b !y are alike4 ,,hippias3 ,o ,socrates1 y are always weav+ ! me%es ( an argum5t1 select+ ! mo/ difficult po9t1 & fa/5+ ^u details in/ead ( grappl+ ) ! matt] 9 h& z a :ole4 ,come n[1 & ,i w demon/rate to y1 if y w all[ me1 by _m satisfactory pro(s1 t ,hom] has made ,a*illes a bett] man ?an ,odysseus1 & a tru?ful man too2 & t he has made ! o!r crafty1 & a tell] ( _m untru?s1 & inf]ior to ,a*illes4 ,& !n1 if y please1 y %all make a spee* on ! o!r side1 9 ord] to prove t ,odysseus is ! bett] man2 & ?is may be comp>$ to m9e1 & !n ! company w "k :i* ( u is ! bett] speak]4 ,,socrates3 ,o ,hippias1 ,i d n d\bt t y are wis] ?an ,i am4 ,b ,i h a way1 :5 anybody else says any?+1 ( giv+ close att5tion to him1 especially if ! speak] appe>s to me to be a wise man4 ,hav+ a desire to und]/&1 ,i "q him1 & ,i exam9e & analyse & put toge!r :at he says1 9 ord] t ,i may und]/&2 b if ! speak] appe>s to me to be a poor h&1 ,i d n int]rogate him1 or tr\ble myself ab\t him1 & y may "k by ?is :o !y are :om ,i deem to be wise m51 = y w see t :5 ,i am talk+ ) a wise man1 ,i am v att5tive to :at he says2 & ,i ask que/ions ( him1 9 ord] t ,i may le>n1 & be improv$ by him4 ,& ,i c\ld n help rem>k+ :ile y 7 speak+1 t :5 y recit$ ! v]ses 9 :i* ,a*illes1 z y argu$1 attacks ,odysseus z a deceiv]1 t y mu/ be /rangely mi/ak51 because ,odysseus1 ! man ( wiles1 is nev] f\nd to tell a lie2 b ,a*illes is f\nd to be wily on y\r own %[+4 ,at any rate he speaks falsely2 = fir/ he utt]s ^! words1 :i* y j n[ repeat$1-- ',he is hateful to me ev5 z ! gates ( dea? :o ?9ks "o ?+ & says ano!r3'-- ,& !n he says1 a little :ile aft]w>ds1 he w n be p]suad$ by ,odysseus & ,agamemnon1 nei!r w he rema9 at ,troy2 b1 says he1-- ',to-morr[1 :5 ,i h (f]$ sacrifices to ,zeus & all ! ,gods1 hav+ load$ my %ips well1 ,i w drag !m d[n into ! deep2 & !n y %all see1 if y h a m9d1 & if su* ?+s are a c>e to y1 e>ly 9 ! morn+ my %ips sail+ ov] ! fi%y ,hellespont1 & my m5 eag]ly ply+ ! o>2 &1 if ! illu/ri\s %ak] ( ! e>? gives me a good voyage1 on ! ?ird day ,i %all rea* ! f]tile ,ph?ia4' ,& be=e t1 :5 he 0 revil+ ,agamemnon1 he said1-- ',& n[ to ,ph?ia ,i w g1 s9ce to return home 9 ! beak$ %ips is f> bett]1 nor am ,i incl9$ to /ay "h 9 di%on\r & amass weal? & ri*es = y4' ,b al?\gh on t occasion1 9 ! pres5ce ( ! :ole army1 he spoke aft] ?is fa%ion1 & on ! o!r occasion to 8 companions1 he appe>s nev] to h made any prep>ation or attempt to draw d[n ! %ips1 z if he _h ! lea/ int5tion ( sail+ home2 s nobly reg>dless 0 he ( ! tru?4 ,n[ ,i1 ,hippias1 orig9ally ask$ y ! "q1 because ,i 0 9 d\bt z to :i* ( ! two h]oes 0 int5d$ by ! poet to be ! be/1 & because ,i ?\ght t bo? ( !m 7 ! be/1 & t x w\ld be difficult to decide :i* 0 ! bett] ( !m1 n only 9 respect ( tru? & falsehood1 b ( virtue g5]ally1 = ev5 9 ?is matt] ( speak+ ! tru? !y are mu* ^u a p>4 ,,hippias3 ,!re y are wrong1 ,socrates2 = 9 s f> z ,a*illes speaks falsely1 ! falsehood is obvi\sly un9t5tional4 ,he is compell$ aga9/ 8 w to rema9 & rescue ! army 9 _! mis=tune4 ,b :5 ,odysseus speaks falsely he is volunt>ily & int5tionally false4 ,,socrates3 ,y1 sweet ,hippias1 l ,odysseus1 are a deceiv] y\rself4 ,,hippias3 ,c]ta9ly n1 ,socrates2 :at makes y say s8 ,,socrates3 ,because y say t ,a*illes does n speak falsely f design1 :5 he is n only a deceiv]1 b besides be+ a bragg>t1 9 ,hom]'s description ( him is s cunn+1 & s f> sup]ior to ,odysseus 9 ly+ & pret5d+1 t he d>es to contradict himself1 & ,odysseus does n f9d him out2 at any rate he does n appe> to say any?+ to him :i* w\ld imply t he p]ceiv$ 8 falsehood4 ,,hippias3 ,:at d y mean1 ,socrates8 ,,socrates3 ,did y n obs]ve t aft]w>ds1 :5 he is speak+ to ,odysseus1 he says t he w sail away ) ! e>ly dawn2 b to ,ajax he tells q a diff]5t /ory8 ,,hippias3 ,:]e is t8 ,,socrates3 ,:]e he says1-- ',i w n ?9k ab\t bloody w> until ! son ( w>like ,priam1 illu/ri\s ,hector1 comes to ! t5ts & %ips ( ! ,myrmidons1 slaught]+ ! ,argives1 & burn+ ! %ips ) fire2 & ab\t my t5t & d>k %ip1 ,i suspect t ,hector1 al?\gh eag] = ! battle1 w nev]!less /ay 8 h&4' ,n[1 d y really ?9k1 ,hippias1 t ! son ( ,!tis1 :o _h be5 ! pupil ( ! sage ,*eiron1 _h su* a bad memory1 or w\ld h c>ri$ ! art ( ly+ to su* an ext5t 7:5 he _h be5 assail+ li>s 9 ! mo/ viol5t t]ms only ! in/ant be=e7 z to say to ,odysseus t he w\ld sail away1 & to ,ajax t he w\ld rema91 & t he 0 n r practis+ ^u ! simplicity ( ,odysseus1 :om he reg>d$ z an anci5t1 & ?9k+ t he w\ld get ! bett] ( him by 8 own cunn+ & falsehood8 ,,hippias3 ,no1 ,i d n agree ) y1 ,socrates2 b ,i believe t ,a*illes is induc$ to say "o ?+ to ,ajax1 & ano!r to ,odysseus 9 ! innoc5ce ( 8 he>t1 :]eas ,odysseus1 :e!r he speaks falsely or truly1 speaks always ) a purpose4 ,,socrates3 ,!n ,odysseus w\ld appe> aft] all to be bett] ?an ,a*illes8 ,,hippias3 ,c]ta9ly n1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,:y1 7 n ! volunt>y li>s only j n[ %[n to be bett] ?an ! involunt>y8 ,,hippias3 ,& h[1 ,socrates1 c ^? :o int5tionally err1 & volunt>ily & design$ly commit iniquities1 be bett] ?an ^? :o err & d wrong involunt>ily8 ,surely !re is a great excuse to be made = a man tell+ a falsehood1 or do+ an injury or any sort ( h>m to ano!r 9 ignorance4 ,& ! laws are obvi\sly f> m sev]e on ^? :o lie or d evil1 volunt>ily1 ?an on ^? :o d evil involunt>ily4 ,,socrates3 ,y see1 ,hippias1 z ,i h already told y1 h[ p]t9aci\s ,i am 9 ask+ que/ions ( wise m54 ,& ,i ?9k t ?is is ! only good po9t ab\t me1 = ,i am full ( defects1 & always gett+ wrong 9 "s way or o!r4 ,my defici5cy is prov$ to me by ! fact t :5 ,i meet "o ( y :o are fam\s = wisdom1 & to ^: wisdom all ! ,hell5es are witnesses1 ,i am f\nd out to "k no?+4 ,= speak+ g5]ally1 ,i h>dly ev] h ! same op9ion ab\t any?+ :i* y h1 & :at pro( ( ignorance c be great] ?an to diff] f wise m58 ,b ,i h "o s+ul> good quality1 :i* is my salvation2 ,i am n a%am$ to le>n1 & ,i ask & enquire1 & am v grateful to ^? :o answ] me1 & nev] fail to give !m my grateful ?anks2 & :5 ,i le>n a ?+ ,i nev] d5y my tea*]1 or pret5d t ! lesson is a discov]y ( my own2 b ,i praise 8 wisdom1 & proclaim :at ,i h le>n$ f him4 ,& n[ ,i _c agree 9 :at y are say+1 b ,i /rongly disagree4 ,well1 ,i "k t ?is is my own fault1 & is a defect 9 my "*1 b ,i w n pret5d to be m ?an ,i am2 & my op9ion1 ,hippias1 is ! v contr>y ( :at y are say+4 ,= ,i ma9ta9 t ^? :o hurt or injure mank9d1 & speak falsely & deceive1 & err volunt>ily1 are bett] f> ?an ^? :o d wrong involunt>ily4 ,sometimes1 h[ev]1 ,i am ( ! opposite op9ion2 = ,i am all abroad 9 my ideas ab\t ?is matt]1 a condition obvi\sly occasion$ by ignorance4 ,& j n[ ,i happ5 to be 9 a crisis ( my disord] at :i* ^? :o err volunt>ily appe> to me bett] ?an ^? :o err involunt>ily4 ,my pres5t /ate ( m9d is due to our previ\s argum5t1 :i* incl9es me to believe t 9 g5]al ^? :o d wrong involunt>ily are worse ?an ^? :o d wrong volunt>ily1 & !re=e ,i hope t y w be good to me1 & n refuse to heal me2 = y w d me a mu* great] b5efit if y cure my s\l ( ignorance1 ?an y w\ld if y 7 to cure my body ( disease4 ,i mu/1 h[ev]1 tell y be=eh&1 t if y make a long oration to me y w n cure me1 = ,i %all n be able to foll[ y2 b if y w answ] me1 z y did j n[1 y w d me a great deal ( good1 & ,i d n ?9k t y w be any ! worse y\rself4 ,& ,i h "s claim ^u y also1 ,o son ( ,apemantus1 = y incit$ me to conv]se ) ,hippias2 & n[1 if ,hippias w n answ] me1 y mu/ entreat him on my behalf4 ,,eudicus3 ,b ,i d n ?9k1 ,socrates1 t ,hippias w require any entreaty ( m9e2 = he has already said t he w refuse to answ] no man4--,did y n say s1 ,hippias8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 ,i did2 b !n1 ,eudicus1 ,socrates is always tr\blesome 9 an argum5t1 & appe>s to be di%one/4 7,comp>e ,gorgias2 ,republic47 ,,socrates3 ,excell5t ,hippias1 ,i d n d s int5tionally 7if ,i did1 x w\ld %[ me to be a wise man & a ma/] ( wiles1 z y w\ld argue71 b un9t5tionally1 & !re=e y mu/ p>don me2 =1 z y say1 he :o is un9t5tionally di%one/ %\ld be p>don$4 ,,eudicus3 ,yes1 ,hippias1 d z he says2 & = our sake1 & also t y may n belie y\r pr(ession1 answ] :atev] ,socrates asks y4 ,,hippias3 ,i w answ]1 z y reque/ me2 & d y ask :atev] y l4 ,,socrates3 ,i am v desir\s1 ,hippias1 ( exam9+ ?is "q1 z to :i* are ! bett]--^? :o err volunt>ily or involunt>ily8 ,& if y w answ] me1 ,i ?9k t ,i c put y 9 ! way ( approa*+ ! subject3 ,y w\ld admit1 w\ld y n1 t !re are good runn]s8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& !re are bad runn]s8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& he :o runs well is a good runn]1 & he :o runs ill is a bad runn]8 ,,hippias3 ,v true4 ,,socrates3 ,& he :o runs sl[ly runs ill1 & he :o runs quickly runs well8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,!n 9 a race1 & 9 runn+1 swiftness is a good1 & sl[ness is an evil quality8 ,,hippias3 ,to be sure4 ,,socrates3 ,:i* ( ! two !n is a bett] runn]8 ,he :o runs sl[ly volunt>ily1 or he :o runs sl[ly involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,he :o runs sl[ly volunt>ily4 ,,socrates3 ,& is n runn+ a species ( do+8 ,,hippias3 ,c]ta9ly4 ,,socrates3 ,& if a species ( do+1 a species ( action8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,!n he :o runs badly does a bad & di%on\rable action 9 a race8 ,,hippias3 ,yes2 a bad action1 c]ta9ly4 ,,socrates3 ,& he :o runs sl[ly runs badly8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,!n ! good runn] does ?is bad & disgraceful action volunt>ily1 & ! bad involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,t is to be inf]r$4 ,,socrates3 ,!n he :o involunt>ily does evil actions1 is worse 9 a race ?an he :o does !m volunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 9 a race4 ,,socrates3 ,well1 b at a wre/l+ mat*--:i* is ! bett] wre/l]1 he :o falls volunt>ily or involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,he :o falls volunt>ily1 d\btless4 ,,socrates3 ,& is x worse or m di%on\rable at a wre/l+ mat*1 to fall1 or to ?r[ ano!r8 ,,hippias3 ,to fall4 ,,socrates3 ,!n1 at a wre/l+ mat*1 he :o volunt>ily does base & di%on\rable actions is a bett] wre/l] ?an he :o does !m involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,t appe>s to be ! tru?4 ,,socrates3 ,& :at w\ld y say ( any o!r bodily ex]cise--is n he :o is bett] made able to d bo? t :i* is /rong & t :i* is weak--t :i* is fair & t :i* is f\l8--s t :5 he does bad actions ) ! body1 he :o is bett] made does !m volunt>ily1 & he :o is worse made does !m involunt>ily4 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 t appe>s to be true ab\t /r5g?4 ,,socrates3 ,& :at d y say ab\t grace1 ,hippias8 ,is n he :o is bett] made able to assume evil & disgraceful figures & po/ures volunt>ily1 z he :o is worse made assumes !m involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,true4 ,,socrates3 ,!n volunt>y ungracefulness comes f excell5ce ( ! bodily frame1 & involunt>y f ! defect ( ! bodily frame8 ,,hippias3 ,true4 ,,socrates3 ,& :at w\ld y say ( an unmusical voice2 w\ld y pref] ! voice :i* is volunt>ily or involunt>ily out ( tune8 ,,hippias3 ,t :i* is volunt>ily out ( tune4 ,,socrates3 ,! involunt>y is ! worse ( ! two8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& w\ld y *oose to possess goods or evils8 ,,hippias3 ,goods4 ,,socrates3 ,& w\ld y r h feet :i* are volunt>ily or involunt>ily lame8 ,,hippias3 ,feet :i* are volunt>ily lame4 ,,socrates3 ,b is n lam5ess a defect or de=mity8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& is n bl9k+ a defect 9 ! eyes8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& w\ld y r always h eyes ) :i* y might volunt>ily bl9k & n see1 or ) :i* y might involunt>ily bl9k8 ,,hippias3 ,i w\ld r h eyes :i* volunt>ily bl9k4 ,,socrates3 ,!n 9 y\r own case y deem t :i* volunt>ily acts ill1 bett] ?an t :i* involunt>ily acts ill8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 c]ta9ly1 9 cases su* z y m5tion4 ,,socrates3 ,& does n ! same hold ( e>s1 no/rils1 m\?1 & ( all ! s5ses--^? :i* involunt>ily act ill are n to be desir$1 z be+ defective2 & ^? :i* volunt>ily act ill are to be desir$ z be+ good8 ,,hippias3 ,i agree4 ,,socrates3 ,& :at w\ld y say ( in/rum5ts2--:i* are ! bett] sort ( in/rum5ts to h to d )8--^? ) :i* a man acts ill volunt>ily or involunt>ily8 ,= example1 _h a man bett] h a rudd] ) :i* he w /e] ill1 volunt>ily or involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,he _h bett] h a rudd] ) :i* he w /e] ill volunt>ily4 ,,socrates3 ,& does n ! same hold ( ! b[ & ! lyre1 ! flute & all o!r ?+s8 ,,hippias3 ,v true4 ,,socrates3 ,& w\ld y r h a horse ( su* a temp] t y may ride him ill volunt>ily or involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,i w\ld r h a horse :i* ,i c\ld ride ill volunt>ily4 ,,socrates3 ,t w\ld be ! bett] horse8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,!n ) a horse ( bett] temp]1 vici\s actions w\ld be produc$ volunt>ily2 & ) a horse ( bad temp] involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,c]ta9ly4 ,,socrates3 ,& t w\ld be true ( a dog1 or ( any o!r animal8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& is x bett] to possess ! m9d ( an ar*] :o volunt>ily or involunt>ily misses ! m>k8 ,,hippias3 ,( him :o volunt>ily misses4 ,,socrates3 ,?is w\ld be ! bett] m9d = ! purposes ( ar*]y8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,!n ! m9d :i* involunt>ily errs is worse ?an ! m9d :i* errs volunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 c]ta9ly1 9 ! use ( ! b[4 ,,socrates3 ,& :at w\ld y say ( ! art ( m$ic9e2--has n ! m9d :i* volunt>ily works h>m to ! body1 m ( ! heal+ art8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,!n 9 ! art ( m$ic9e ! volunt>y is bett] ?an ! involunt>y8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,well1 & 9 lute-play+ & 9 flute-play+1 & 9 all arts & sci5ces1 is n t m9d ! bett] :i* volunt>ily does :at is evil & di%on\rable1 & goes wrong1 & is n ! worse t :i* does s involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,t is evid5t4 ,,socrates3 ,& :at w\ld y say ( ! *>act]s ( slaves8 ,%\ld we n pref] to h ^? :o volunt>ily d wrong & make mi/akes1 & are !y n bett] 9 _! mi/akes ?an ^? :o commit !m involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& %\ld we n desire to h our own m9ds 9 ! be/ /ate possible8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& w our m9ds be bett] if !y d wrong & make mi/akes volunt>ily or involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,o1 ,socrates1 x w\ld be a mon/r\s ?+ to say t ^? :o d wrong volunt>ily are bett] ?an ^? :o d wrong involunt>ily6 ,,socrates3 ,& yet t appe>s to be ! only inf]5ce4 ,,hippias3 ,i d n ?9k s4 ,,socrates3 ,b ,i imag9$1 ,hippias1 t y did4 ,please to answ] once m3 ,is n ju/ice a p[]1 or k1 or bo?8 ,mu/ n ju/ice1 at all ev5ts1 be "o ( ^!8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,b if ju/ice is a p[] ( ! s\l1 !n ! s\l :i* has ! great] p[] is also ! m j2 = t :i* has ! great] p[]1 my good fri5d1 has be5 prov$ by u to be ! bett]4 ,,hippias3 ,yes1 t has be5 prov$4 ,,socrates3 ,& if ju/ice is k1 !n ! wis] w be ! ju/] s\l1 & ! m ignorant ! m unju/8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,b if ju/ice be p[] z well z k--!n w n ! s\l :i* has bo? k & p[] be ! m j1 & t :i* is ! m ignorant be ! m unju/8 ,mu/ x n be s8 ,,hippias3 ,cle>ly4 ,,socrates3 ,& is n ! s\l :i* has ! great] p[] & wisdom also bett]1 & bett] able to d bo? good & evil 9 e action8 ,,hippias3 ,c]ta9ly4 ,,socrates3 ,! s\l1 !n1 :i* acts ill1 acts volunt>ily by p[] & art--& ^! ei!r "o or bo? ( !m are elem5ts ( ju/ice8 ,,hippias3 ,t seems to be true4 ,,socrates3 ,& to d inju/ice is to d ill1 & n to d inju/ice is to d well8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,& w n ! bett] & abl] s\l :5 x does wrong1 d wrong volunt>ily1 & ! bad s\l involunt>ily8 ,,hippias3 ,cle>ly4 ,,socrates3 ,& ! good man is he :o has ! good s\l1 & ! bad man is he :o has ! bad8 ,,hippias3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,!n ! good man w volunt>ily d wrong1 & ! bad man involunt>ily1 if ! good man is he :o has ! good s\l8 ,,hippias3 ,:i* he c]ta9ly has4 ,,socrates3 ,!n1 ,hippias1 he :o volunt>ily does wrong & disgraceful ?+s1 if !re be su* a man1 w be ! good man8 ,,hippias3 ,!re ,i _c agree ) y4 ,,socrates3 ,nor c ,i agree ) myself1 ,hippias2 & yet t seems to be ! conclusion :i*1 z f> z we c see at pres5t1 mu/ foll[ f our argum5t4 ,z ,i 0 say+ be=e1 ,i am all abroad1 & be+ 9 p]plexity am always *ang+ my op9ion4 ,n[1 t ,i or any ord9>y man %\ld w&] 9 p]plexity is n surpris+2 b if y wise m5 also w&]1 & we _c come to y & re/ f our w&]+1 ! matt] beg9s to be s]i\s bo? to u & to y4