,,ion ,by ,plato ,translated by ,benjamin ,jowett ,,introduction4 ,the ,ion is the shortest1 or nearly the shortest1 of all the writings which bear the name of ,plato1 and is not authenticated by any early external testimony4 ,the grace and beauty of this little work supply the only1 and perhaps a sufficient1 proof of its genuineness4 ,the plan is simple2 the dramatic interest consists entirely in the contrast between the irony of ,socrates and the transparent vanity and childlike enthusiasm of the rhapsode ,ion4 ,the theme of the ,dialogue may possibly have been suggested by the passage of ,xenophon's ,memorabilia in which the rhapsodists are described by ,euthydemus as 'very precise about the exact words of ,homer1 but very idiotic themselves4' 7,compare ,aristotle1 ,met47 ,ion the rhapsode has just come to ,athens2 he has been exhibiting in ,epidaurus at the festival of ,asclepius1 and is intending to exhibit at the festival of the ,panathenaea4 ,socrates admires and envies the rhapsode's art2 for he is always well dressed and in good company--in the company of good poets and of ,homer1 who is the prince of them4 ,in the course of conversation the admission is elicited from ,ion that his skill is restricted to ,homer1 and that he knows nothing of inferior poets1 such as ,hesiod and ,archilochus2--he brightens up and is wide awake when ,homer is being recited1 but is apt to go to sleep at the recitations of any other poet4 ',and yet1 surely1 he who knows the superior ought to know the inferior also2--he who can judge of the good speaker is able to judge of the bad4 ,and poetry is a whole2 and he who judges of poetry by rules of art ought to be able to judge of all poetry4' ,this is confirmed by the analogy of sculpture1 painting1 flute-playing1 and the other arts4 ,the argument is at last brought home to the mind of ,ion1 who asks how this contradiction is to be solved4 ,the solution given by ,socrates is as follows3-- ,the rhapsode is not guided by rules of art1 but is an inspired person who derives a mysterious power from the poet2 and the poet1 in like manner1 is inspired by the ,god4 ,the poets and their interpreters may be compared to a chain of magnetic rings suspended from one another1 and from a magnet4 ,the magnet is the ,muse1 and the ring which immediately follows is the poet himself2 from him are suspended other poets2 there is also a chain of rhapsodes and actors1 who also hang from the ,muses1 but are let down at the side2 and the last ring of all is the spectator4 ,the poet is the inspired interpreter of the ,god1 and this is the reason why some poets1 like ,homer1 are restricted to a single theme1 or1 like ,tynnichus1 are famous for a single poem2 and the rhapsode is the inspired interpreter of the poet1 and for a similar reason some rhapsodes1 like ,ion1 are the interpreters of single poets4 ,ion is delighted at the notion of being inspired1 and acknowledges that he is beside himself when he is performing2--his eyes rain tears and his hair stands on end4 ,socrates is of opinion that a man must be mad who behaves in this way at a festival when he is surrounded by his friends and there is nothing to trouble him4 ,ion is confident that ,socrates would never think him mad if he could only hear his embellishments of ,homer4 ,socrates asks whether he can speak well about everything in ,homer4 ',yes1 indeed he can4' ',what about things of which he has no knowledge8' ,ion answers that he can interpret anything in ,homer4 ,but1 rejoins ,socrates1 when ,homer speaks of the arts1 as for example1 of chariot-driving1 or of medicine1 or of prophecy1 or of navigation--will he1 or will the charioteer or physician or prophet or pilot be the better judge8 ,ion is compelled to admit that every man will judge of his own particular art better than the rhapsode4 ,he still maintains1 however1 that he understands the art of the general as well as any one4 ',then why in this city of ,athens1 in which men of merit are always being sought after1 is he not at once appointed a general8' ,ion replies that he is a foreigner1 and the ,athenians and ,spartans will not appoint a foreigner to be their general4 ',no1 that is not the real reason2 there are many examples to the contrary4 ,but ,ion has long been playing tricks with the argument2 like ,proteus1 he transforms himself into a variety of shapes1 and is at last about to run away in the disguise of a general4 ,would he rather be regarded as inspired or dishonest8' ,ion1 who has no suspicion of the irony of ,socrates1 eagerly embraces the alternative of inspiration4 ,the ,ion1 like the other earlier ,platonic ,dialogues1 is a mixture of jest and earnest1 in which no definite result is obtained1 but some ,socratic or ,platonic truths are allowed dimly to appear4 ,the elements of a true theory of poetry are contained in the notion that the poet is inspired4 ,genius is often said to be unconscious1 or spontaneous1 or a gift of nature3 that 'genius is akin to madness' is a popular aphorism of modern times4 ,the greatest strength is observed to have an element of limitation4 ,sense or passion are too much for the 'dry light' of intelligence which mingles with them and becomes discoloured by them4 ,imagination is often at war with reason and fact4 ,the concentration of the mind on a single object1 or on a single aspect of human nature1 overpowers the orderly perception of the whole4 ,yet the feelings too bring truths home to the minds of many who in the way of reason would be incapable of understanding them4 ,reflections of this kind may have been passing before ,plato's mind when he describes the poet as inspired1 or when1 as in the ,apology1 he speaks of poets as the worst critics of their own writings--anybody taken at random from the crowd is a better interpreter of them than they are of themselves4 ,they are sacred persons1 'winged and holy things' who have a touch of madness in their composition 7,phaedr471 and should be treated with every sort of respect 7,republic71 but not allowed to live in a well-ordered state4 ,like the ,statesmen in the ,meno1 they have a divine instinct1 but they are narrow and confused2 they do not attain to the clearness of ideas1 or to the knowledge of poetry or of any other art as a whole4 ,in the ,protagoras the ancient poets are recognized by ,protagoras himself as the original sophists2 and this family resemblance may be traced in the ,ion4 ,the rhapsode belongs to the realm of imitation and of opinion3 he professes to have all knowledge1 which is derived by him from ,homer1 just as the sophist professes to have all wisdom1 which is contained in his art of rhetoric4 ,even more than the sophist he is incapable of appreciating the commonest logical distinctions2 he cannot explain the nature of his own art2 his great memory contrasts with his inability to follow the steps of the argument4 ,and in his highest moments of inspiration he has an eye to his own gains4 ,the old quarrel between philosophy and poetry1 which in the ,republic leads to their final separation1 is already working in the mind of ,plato1 and is embodied by him in the contrast between ,socrates and ,ion4 ,yet here1 as in the ,republic1 ,socrates shows a sympathy with the poetic nature4 ,also1 the manner in which ,ion is affected by his own recitations affords a lively illustration of the power which1 in the ,republic1 ,socrates attributes to dramatic performances over the mind of the performer4 ,his allusion to his embellishments of ,homer1 in which he declares himself to have surpassed ,metrodorus of ,lampsacus and ,stesimbrotus of ,thasos1 seems to show that1 like them1 he belonged to the allegorical school of interpreters4 ,the circumstance that nothing more is known of him may be adduced in confirmation of the argument that this truly ,platonic little work is not a forgery of later times4 ,,ion ,,persons ,,of ,,the ,,dialogue3 ,socrates1 ,ion4 ,,socrates3 ,welcome1 ,ion4 ,are you from your native city of ,ephesus8 ,,ion3 ,no1 ,socrates2 but from ,epidaurus1 where ,i attended the festival of ,asclepius4 ,,socrates3 ,and do the ,epidaurians have contests of rhapsodes at the festival8 ,,ion3 ,o yes2 and of all sorts of musical performers4 ,,socrates3 ,and were you one of the competitors--and did you succeed8 ,,ion3 ,i obtained the first prize of all1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,well done2 and ,i hope that you will do the same for us at the ,panathenaea4 ,,ion3 ,and ,i will1 please heaven4 ,,socrates3 ,i often envy the profession of a rhapsode1 ,ion2 for you have always to wear fine clothes1 and to look as beautiful as you can is a part of your art4 ,then1 again1 you are obliged to be continually in the company of many good poets2 and especially of ,homer1 who is the best and most divine of them2 and to understand him1 and not merely learn his words by rote1 is a thing greatly to be envied4 ,and no man can be a rhapsode who does not understand the meaning of the poet4 ,for the rhapsode ought to interpret the mind of the poet to his hearers1 but how can he interpret him well unless he knows what he means8 ,all this is greatly to be envied4 ,,ion3 ,very true1 ,socrates2 interpretation has certainly been the most laborious part of my art2 and ,i believe myself able to speak about ,homer better than any man2 and that neither ,metrodorus of ,lampsacus1 nor ,stesimbrotus of ,thasos1 nor ,glaucon1 nor any one else who ever was1 had as good ideas about ,homer as ,i have1 or as many4 ,,socrates3 ,i am glad to hear you say so1 ,ion2 ,i see that you will not refuse to acquaint me with them4 ,,ion3 ,certainly1 ,socrates2 and you really ought to hear how exquisitely ,i render ,homer4 ,i think that the ,homeridae should give me a golden crown4 ,,socrates3 ,i shall take an opportunity of hearing your embellishments of him at some other time4 ,but just now ,i should like to ask you a question3 ,does your art extend to ,hesiod and ,archilochus1 or to ,homer only8 ,,ion3 ,to ,homer only2 he is in himself quite enough4 ,,socrates3 ,are there any things about which ,homer and ,hesiod agree8 ,,ion3 ,yes2 in my opinion there are a good many4 ,,socrates3 ,and can you interpret better what ,homer says1 or what ,hesiod says1 about these matters in which they agree8 ,,ion3 ,i can interpret them equally well1 ,socrates1 where they agree4 ,,socrates3 ,but what about matters in which they do not agree8--for example1 about divination1 of which both ,homer and ,hesiod have something to say1-- ,,ion3 ,very true3 ,,socrates3 ,would you or a good prophet be a better interpreter of what these two poets say about divination1 not only when they agree1 but when they disagree8 ,,ion3 ,a prophet4 ,,socrates3 ,and if you were a prophet1 would you not be able to interpret them when they disagree as well as when they agree8 ,,ion3 ,clearly4 ,,socrates3 ,but how did you come to have this skill about ,homer only1 and not about ,hesiod or the other poets8 ,does not ,homer speak of the same themes which all other poets handle8 ,is not war his great argument8 and does he not speak of human society and of intercourse of men1 good and bad1 skilled and unskilled1 and of the gods conversing with one another and with mankind1 and about what happens in heaven and in the world below1 and the generations of gods and heroes8 ,are not these the themes of which ,homer sings8 ,,ion3 ,very true1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,and do not the other poets sing of the same8 ,,ion3 ,yes1 ,socrates2 but not in the same way as ,homer4 ,,socrates3 ,what1 in a worse way8 ,,ion3 ,yes1 in a far worse4 ,,socrates3 ,and ,homer in a better way8 ,,ion3 ,he is incomparably better4 ,,socrates3 ,and yet surely1 my dear friend ,ion1 in a discussion about arithmetic1 where many people are speaking1 and one speaks better than the rest1 there is somebody who can judge which of them is the good speaker8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,and he who judges of the good will be the same as he who judges of the bad speakers8 ,,ion3 ,the same4 ,,socrates3 ,and he will be the arithmetician8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,well1 and in discussions about the wholesomeness of food1 when many persons are speaking1 and one speaks better than the rest1 will he who recognizes the better speaker be a different person from him who recognizes the worse1 or the same8 ,,ion3 ,clearly the same4 ,,socrates3 ,and who is he1 and what is his name8 ,,ion3 ,the physician4 ,,socrates3 ,and speaking generally1 in all discussions in which the subject is the same and many men are speaking1 will not he who knows the good know the bad speaker also8 ,for if he does not know the bad1 neither will he know the good when the same topic is being discussed4 ,,ion3 ,true4 ,,socrates3 ,is not the same person skilful in both8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,and you say that ,homer and the other poets1 such as ,hesiod and ,archilochus1 speak of the same things1 although not in the same way2 but the one speaks well and the other not so well8 ,,ion3 ,yes2 and ,i am right in saying so4 ,,socrates3 ,and if you knew the good speaker1 you would also know the inferior speakers to be inferior8 ,,ion3 ,that is true4 ,,socrates3 ,then1 my dear friend1 can ,i be mistaken in saying that ,ion is equally skilled in ,homer and in other poets1 since he himself acknowledges that the same person will be a good judge of all those who speak of the same things2 and that almost all poets do speak of the same things8 ,,ion3 ,why then1 ,socrates1 do ,i lose attention and go to sleep and have absolutely no ideas of the least value1 when any one speaks of any other poet2 but when ,homer is mentioned1 ,i wake up at once and am all attention and have plenty to say8 ,,socrates3 ,the reason1 my friend1 is obvious4 ,no one can fail to see that you speak of ,homer without any art or knowledge4 ,if you were able to speak of him by rules of art1 you would have been able to speak of all other poets2 for poetry is a whole4 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,and when any one acquires any other art as a whole1 the same may be said of them4 ,would you like me to explain my meaning1 ,ion8 ,,ion3 ,yes1 indeed1 ,socrates2 ,i very much wish that you would3 for ,i love to hear you wise men talk4 ,,socrates3 ,o that we were wise1 ,ion1 and that you could truly call us so2 but you rhapsodes and actors1 and the poets whose verses you sing1 are wise2 whereas ,i am a common man1 who only speak the truth4 ,for consider what a very commonplace and trivial thing is this which ,i have said--a thing which any man might say3 that when a man has acquired a knowledge of a whole art1 the enquiry into good and bad is one and the same4 ,let us consider this matter2 is not the art of painting a whole8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,and there are and have been many painters good and bad8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,and did you ever know any one who was skilful in pointing out the excellences and defects of ,polygnotus the son of ,aglaophon1 but incapable of criticizing other painters2 and when the work of any other painter was produced1 went to sleep and was at a loss1 and had no ideas2 but when he had to give his opinion about ,polygnotus1 or whoever the painter might be1 and about him only1 woke up and was attentive and had plenty to say8 ,,ion3 ,no indeed1 ,i have never known such a person4 ,,socrates3 ,or did you ever know of any one in sculpture1 who was skilful in expounding the merits of ,daedalus the son of ,metion1 or of ,epeius the son of ,panopeus1 or of ,theodorus the ,samian1 or of any individual sculptor2 but when the works of sculptors in general were produced1 was at a loss and went to sleep and had nothing to say8 ,,ion3 ,no indeed2 no more than the other4 ,,socrates3 ,and if ,i am not mistaken1 you never met with any one among flute-players or harp-players or singers to the harp or rhapsodes who was able to discourse of ,olympus or ,thamyras or ,orpheus1 or ,phemius the rhapsode of ,ithaca1 but was at a loss when he came to speak of ,ion of ,ephesus1 and had no notion of his merits or defects8 ,,ion3 ,i cannot deny what you say1 ,socrates4 ,nevertheless ,i am conscious in my own self1 and the world agrees with me in thinking that ,i do speak better and have more to say about ,homer than any other man4 ,but ,i do not speak equally well about others--tell me the reason of this4 ,,socrates3 ,i perceive1 ,ion2 and ,i will proceed to explain to you what ,i imagine to be the reason of this4 ,the gift which you possess of speaking excellently about ,homer is not an art1 but1 as ,i was just saying1 an inspiration2 there is a divinity moving you1 like that contained in the stone which ,euripides calls a magnet1 but which is commonly known as the stone of ,heraclea4 ,this stone not only attracts iron rings1 but also imparts to them a similar power of attracting other rings2 and sometimes you may see a number of pieces of iron and rings suspended from one another so as to form quite a long chain3 and all of them derive their power of suspension from the original stone4 ,in like manner the ,muse first of all inspires men herself2 and from these inspired persons a chain of other persons is suspended1 who take the inspiration4 ,for all good poets1 epic as well as lyric1 compose their beautiful poems not by art1 but because they are inspired and possessed4 ,and as the ,corybantian revellers when they dance are not in their right mind1 so the lyric poets are not in their right mind when they are composing their beautiful strains3 but when falling under the power of music and metre they are inspired and possessed2 like ,bacchic maidens who draw milk and honey from the rivers when they are under the influence of ,dionysus but not when they are in their right mind4 ,and the soul of the lyric poet does the same1 as they themselves say2 for they tell us that they bring songs from honeyed fountains1 culling them out of the gardens and dells of the ,muses2 they1 like the bees1 winging their way from flower to flower4 ,and this is true4 ,for the poet is a light and winged and holy thing1 and there is no invention in him until he has been inspired and is out of his senses1 and the mind is no longer in him3 when he has not attained to this state1 he is powerless and is unable to utter his oracles4 ,many are the noble words in which poets speak concerning the actions of men2 but like yourself when speaking about ,homer1 they do not speak of them by any rules of art3 they are simply inspired to utter that to which the ,muse impels them1 and that only2 and when inspired1 one of them will make dithyrambs1 another hymns of praise1 another choral strains1 another epic or iambic verses--and he who is good at one is not good at any other kind of verse3 for not by art does the poet sing1 but by power divine4 ,had he learned by rules of art1 he would have known how to speak not of one theme only1 but of all2 and therefore ,god takes away the minds of poets1 and uses them as his ministers1 as he also uses diviners and holy prophets1 in order that we who hear them may know them to be speaking not of themselves who utter these priceless words in a state of unconsciousness1 but that ,god himself is the speaker1 and that through them he is conversing with us4 ,and ,tynnichus the ,chalcidian affords a striking instance of what ,i am saying3 he wrote nothing that any one would care to remember but the famous paean which is in every one's mouth1 one of the finest poems ever written1 simply an invention of the ,muses1 as he himself says4 ,for in this way the ,god would seem to indicate to us and not allow us to doubt that these beautiful poems are not human1 or the work of man1 but divine and the work of ,god2 and that the poets are only the interpreters of the ,gods by whom they are severally possessed4 ,was not this the lesson which the ,god intended to teach when by the mouth of the worst of poets he sang the best of songs8 ,am ,i not right1 ,ion8 ,,ion3 ,yes1 indeed1 ,socrates1 ,i feel that you are2 for your words touch my soul1 and ,i am persuaded that good poets by a divine inspiration interpret the things of the ,gods to us4 ,,socrates3 ,and you rhapsodists are the interpreters of the poets8 ,,ion3 ,there again you are right4 ,,socrates3 ,then you are the interpreters of interpreters8 ,,ion3 ,precisely4 ,,socrates3 ,i wish you would frankly tell me1 ,ion1 what ,i am going to ask of you3 ,when you produce the greatest effect upon the audience in the recitation of some striking passage1 such as the apparition of ,odysseus leaping forth on the floor1 recognized by the suitors and casting his arrows at his feet1 or the description of ,achilles rushing at ,hector1 or the sorrows of ,andromache1 ,hecuba1 or ,priam1--are you in your right mind8 ,are you not carried out of yourself1 and does not your soul in an ecstasy seem to be among the persons or places of which you are speaking1 whether they are in ,ithaca or in ,troy or whatever may be the scene of the poem8 ,,ion3 ,that proof strikes home to me1 ,socrates4 ,for ,i must frankly confess that at the tale of pity my eyes are filled with tears1 and when ,i speak of horrors1 my hair stands on end and my heart throbs4 ,,socrates3 ,well1 ,ion1 and what are we to say of a man who at a sacrifice or festival1 when he is dressed in holiday attire1 and has golden crowns upon his head1 of which nobody has robbed him1 appears weeping or panic-stricken in the presence of more than twenty thousand friendly faces1 when there is no one despoiling or wronging him2--is he in his right mind or is he not8 ,,ion3 ,no indeed1 ,socrates1 ,i must say that1 strictly speaking1 he is not in his right mind4 ,,socrates3 ,and are you aware that you produce similar effects on most of the spectators8 ,,ion3 ,only too well2 for ,i look down upon them from the stage1 and behold the various emotions of pity1 wonder1 sternness1 stamped upon their countenances when ,i am speaking3 and ,i am obliged to give my very best attention to them2 for if ,i make them cry ,i myself shall laugh1 and if ,i make them laugh ,i myself shall cry when the time of payment arrives4 ,,socrates3 ,do you know that the spectator is the last of the rings which1 as ,i am saying1 receive the power of the original magnet from one another8 ,the rhapsode like yourself and the actor are intermediate links1 and the poet himself is the first of them4 ,through all these the ,god sways the souls of men in any direction which he pleases1 and makes one man hang down from another4 ,thus there is a vast chain of dancers and masters and under-masters of choruses1 who are suspended1 as if from the stone1 at the side of the rings which hang down from the ,muse4 ,and every poet has some ,muse from whom he is suspended1 and by whom he is said to be possessed1 which is nearly the same thing2 for he is taken hold of4 ,and from these first rings1 which are the poets1 depend others1 some deriving their inspiration from ,orpheus1 others from ,musaeus2 but the greater number are possessed and held by ,homer4 ,of whom1 ,ion1 you are one1 and are possessed by ,homer2 and when any one repeats the words of another poet you go to sleep1 and know not what to say2 but when any one recites a strain of ,homer you wake up in a moment1 and your soul leaps within you1 and you have plenty to say2 for not by art or knowledge about ,homer do you say what you say1 but by divine inspiration and by possession2 just as the ,corybantian revellers too have a quick perception of that strain only which is appropriated to the ,god by whom they are possessed1 and have plenty of dances and words for that1 but take no heed of any other4 ,and you1 ,ion1 when the name of ,homer is mentioned have plenty to say1 and have nothing to say of others4 ,you ask1 ',why is this8' ,the answer is that you praise ,homer not by art but by divine inspiration4 ,,ion3 ,that is good1 ,socrates2 and yet ,i doubt whether you will ever have eloquence enough to persuade me that ,i praise ,homer only when ,i am mad and possessed2 and if you could hear me speak of him ,i am sure you would never think this to be the case4 ,,socrates3 ,i should like very much to hear you1 but not until you have answered a question which ,i have to ask4 ,on what part of ,homer do you speak well8--not surely about every part4 ,,ion3 ,there is no part1 ,socrates1 about which ,i do not speak well3 of that ,i can assure you4 ,,socrates3 ,surely not about things in ,homer of which you have no knowledge8 ,,ion3 ,and what is there in ,homer of which ,i have no knowledge8 ,,socrates3 ,why1 does not ,homer speak in many passages about arts8 ,for example1 about driving2 if ,i can only remember the lines ,i will repeat them4 ,,ion3 ,i remember1 and will repeat them4 ,,socrates3 ,tell me then1 what ,nestor says to ,antilochus1 his son1 where he bids him be careful of the turn at the horserace in honour of ,patroclus4 ,,ion3 ',bend gently1' he says1 'in the polished chariot to the left of them1 and urge the horse on the right hand with whip and voice2 and slacken the rein4 ,and when you are at the goal1 let the left horse draw near1 yet so that the nave of the well-wrought wheel may not even seem to touch the extremity2 and avoid catching the stone 7,il474' ,,socrates3 ,enough4 ,now1 ,ion1 will the charioteer or the physician be the better judge of the propriety of these lines8 ,,ion3 ,the charioteer1 clearly4 ,,socrates3 ,and will the reason be that this is his art1 or will there be any other reason8 ,,ion3 ,no1 that will be the reason4 ,,socrates3 ,and every art is appointed by ,god to have knowledge of a certain work2 for that which we know by the art of the pilot we do not know by the art of medicine8 ,,ion3 ,certainly not4 ,,socrates3 ,nor do we know by the art of the carpenter that which we know by the art of medicine8 ,,ion3 ,certainly not4 ,,socrates3 ,and this is true of all the arts2--that which we know with one art we do not know with the other8 ,but let me ask a prior question3 ,you admit that there are differences of arts8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,you would argue1 as ,i should1 that when one art is of one kind of knowledge and another of another1 they are different8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,yes1 surely2 for if the subject of knowledge were the same1 there would be no meaning in saying that the arts were different1--if they both gave the same knowledge4 ,for example1 ,i know that here are five fingers1 and you know the same4 ,and if ,i were to ask whether ,i and you became acquainted with this fact by the help of the same art of arithmetic1 you would acknowledge that we did8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,tell me1 then1 what ,i was intending to ask you1--whether this holds universally8 ,must the same art have the same subject of knowledge1 and different arts other subjects of knowledge8 ,,ion3 ,that is my opinion1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,then he who has no knowledge of a particular art will have no right judgment of the sayings and doings of that art8 ,,ion3 ,very true4 ,,socrates3 ,then which will be a better judge of the lines which you were reciting from ,homer1 you or the charioteer8 ,,ion3 ,the charioteer4 ,,socrates3 ,why1 yes1 because you are a rhapsode and not a charioteer4 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,and the art of the rhapsode is different from that of the charioteer8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,and if a different knowledge1 then a knowledge of different matters8 ,,ion3 ,true4 ,,socrates3 ,you know the passage in which ,hecamede1 the concubine of ,nestor1 is described as giving to the wounded ,machaon a posset1 as he says1 ',made with ,pramnian wine2 and she grated cheese of goat's milk with a grater of bronze1 and at his side placed an onion which gives a relish to drink 7,il474' ,now would you say that the art of the rhapsode or the art of medicine was better able to judge of the propriety of these lines8 ,,ion3 ,the art of medicine4 ,,socrates3 ,and when ,homer says1 ',and she descended into the deep like a leaden plummet1 which1 set in the horn of ox that ranges in the fields1 rushes along carrying death among the ravenous fishes 7,il471'-- will the art of the fisherman or of the rhapsode be better able to judge whether these lines are rightly expressed or not8 ,,ion3 ,clearly1 ,socrates1 the art of the fisherman4 ,,socrates3 ,come now1 suppose that you were to say to me3 ',since you1 ,socrates1 are able to assign different passages in ,homer to their corresponding arts1 ,i wish that you would tell me what are the passages of which the excellence ought to be judged by the prophet and prophetic art'2 and you will see how readily and truly ,i shall answer you4 ,for there are many such passages1 particularly in the ,odyssee2 as1 for example1 the passage in which ,theoclymenus the prophet of the house of ,melampus says to the suitors3-- ',wretched men6 what is happening to you8 ,your heads and your faces and your limbs underneath are shrouded in night2 and the voice of lamentation bursts forth1 and your cheeks are wet with tears4 ,and the vestibule is full1 and the court is full1 of ghosts descending into the darkness of ,erebus1 and the sun has perished out of heaven1 and an evil mist is spread abroad 7,od474' ,and there are many such passages in the ,iliad also2 as for example in the description of the battle near the rampart1 where he says3-- ',as they were eager to pass the ditch1 there came to them an omen3 a soaring eagle1 holding back the people on the left1 bore a huge bloody dragon in his talons1 still living and panting2 nor had he yet resigned the strife1 for he bent back and smote the bird which carried him on the breast by the neck1 and he in pain let him fall from him to the ground into the midst of the multitude4 ,and the eagle1 with a cry1 was borne afar on the wings of the wind 7,il474' ,these are the sort of things which ,i should say that the prophet ought to consider and determine4 ,,ion3 ,and you are quite right1 ,socrates1 in saying so4 ,,socrates3 ,yes1 ,ion1 and you are right also4 ,and as ,i have selected from the ,iliad and ,odyssee for you passages which describe the office of the prophet and the physician and the fisherman1 do you1 who know ,homer so much better than ,i do1 ,ion1 select for me passages which relate to the rhapsode and the rhapsode's art1 and which the rhapsode ought to examine and judge of better than other men4 ,,ion3 ,all passages1 ,i should say1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,not all1 ,ion1 surely4 ,have you already forgotten what you were saying8 ,a rhapsode ought to have a better memory4 ,,ion3 ,why1 what am ,i forgetting8 ,,socrates3 ,do you not remember that you declared the art of the rhapsode to be different from the art of the charioteer8 ,,ion3 ,yes1 ,i remember4 ,,socrates3 ,and you admitted that being different they would have different subjects of knowledge8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,then upon your own showing the rhapsode1 and the art of the rhapsode1 will not know everything8 ,,ion3 ,i should exclude certain things1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,you mean to say that you would exclude pretty much the subjects of the other arts4 ,as he does not know all of them1 which of them will he know8 ,,ion3 ,he will know what a man and what a woman ought to say1 and what a freeman and what a slave ought to say1 and what a ruler and what a subject4 ,,socrates3 ,do you mean that a rhapsode will know better than the pilot what the ruler of a sea-tossed vessel ought to say8 ,,ion3 ,no2 the pilot will know best4 ,,socrates3 ,or will the rhapsode know better than the physician what the ruler of a sick man ought to say8 ,,ion3 ,he will not4 ,,socrates3 ,but he will know what a slave ought to say8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,suppose the slave to be a cowherd2 the rhapsode will know better than the cowherd what he ought to say in order to soothe the infuriated cows8 ,,ion3 ,no1 he will not4 ,,socrates3 ,but he will know what a spinning-woman ought to say about the working of wool8 ,,ion3 ,no4 ,,socrates3 ,at any rate he will know what a general ought to say when exhorting his soldiers8 ,,ion3 ,yes1 that is the sort of thing which the rhapsode will be sure to know4 ,,socrates3 ,well1 but is the art of the rhapsode the art of the general8 ,,ion3 ,i am sure that ,i should know what a general ought to say4 ,,socrates3 ,why1 yes1 ,ion1 because you may possibly have a knowledge of the art of the general as well as of the rhapsode2 and you may also have a knowledge of horsemanship as well as of the lyre3 and then you would know when horses were well or ill managed4 ,but suppose ,i were to ask you3 ,by the help of which art1 ,ion1 do you know whether horses are well managed1 by your skill as a horseman or as a performer on the lyre--what would you answer8 ,,ion3 ,i should reply1 by my skill as a horseman4 ,,socrates3 ,and if you judged of performers on the lyre1 you would admit that you judged of them as a performer on the lyre1 and not as a horseman8 ,,ion3 ,yes4 ,,socrates3 ,and in judging of the general's art1 do you judge of it as a general or a rhapsode8 ,,ion3 ,to me there appears to be no difference between them4 ,,socrates3 ,what do you mean8 ,do you mean to say that the art of the rhapsode and of the general is the same8 ,,ion3 ,yes1 one and the same4 ,,socrates3 ,then he who is a good rhapsode is also a good general8 ,,ion3 ,certainly1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,and he who is a good general is also a good rhapsode8 ,,ion3 ,no2 ,i do not say that4 ,,socrates3 ,but you do say that he who is a good rhapsode is also a good general4 ,,ion3 ,certainly4 ,,socrates3 ,and you are the best of ,hellenic rhapsodes8 ,,ion3 ,far the best1 ,socrates4 ,,socrates3 ,and are you the best general1 ,ion8 ,,ion3 ,to be sure1 ,socrates2 and ,homer was my master4 ,,socrates3 ,but then1 ,ion1 what in the name of goodness can be the reason why you1 who are the best of generals as well as the best of rhapsodes in all ,hellas1 go about as a rhapsode when you might be a general8 ,do you think that the ,hellenes want a rhapsode with his golden crown1 and do not want a general8 ,,ion3 ,why1 ,socrates1 the reason is1 that my countrymen1 the ,ephesians1 are the servants and soldiers of ,athens1 and do not need a general2 and you and ,sparta are not likely to have me1 for you think that you have enough generals of your own4 ,,socrates3 ,my good ,ion1 did you never hear of ,apollodorus of ,cyzicus8 ,,ion3 ,who may he be8 ,,socrates3 ,one who1 though a foreigner1 has often been chosen their general by the ,athenians3 and there is ,phanosthenes of ,andros1 and ,heraclides of ,clazomenae1 whom they have also appointed to the command of their armies and to other offices1 although aliens1 after they had shown their merit4 ,and will they not choose ,ion the ,ephesian to be their general1 and honour him1 if he prove himself worthy8 ,were not the ,ephesians originally ,athenians1 and ,ephesus is no mean city8 ,but1 indeed1 ,ion1 if you are correct in saying that by art and knowledge you are able to praise ,homer1 you do not deal fairly with me1 and after all your professions of knowing many glorious things about ,homer1 and promises that you would exhibit them1 you are only a deceiver1 and so far from exhibiting the art of which you are a master1 will not1 even after my repeated entreaties1 explain to me the nature of it4 ,you have literally as many forms as ,proteus2 and now you go all manner of ways1 twisting and turning1 and1 like ,proteus1 become all manner of people at once1 and at last slip away from me in the disguise of a general1 in order that you may escape exhibiting your ,homeric lore4 ,and if you have art1 then1 as ,i was saying1 in falsifying your promise that you would exhibit ,homer1 you are not dealing fairly with me4 ,but if1 as ,i believe1 you have no art1 but speak all these beautiful words about ,homer unconsciously under his inspiring influence1 then ,i acquit you of dishonesty1 and shall only say that you are inspired4 ,which do you prefer to be thought1 dishonest or inspired8 ,,ion3 ,there is a great difference1 ,socrates1 between the two alternatives2 and inspiration is by far the nobler4 ,,socrates3 ,then1 ,ion1 ,i shall assume the nobler alternative2 and attribute to you in your praises of ,homer inspiration1 and not art4