,the ,things ,which ,remain ,an ,address ,to ,young ,ministers ,by ,,daniel ,a4 ,,goodsell ,a ,bishop of the ,methodist ,episcopal ,church ,,cincinnati3 ,,jennings ,,pye ,,new ,,york3 ,,eaton ,,mains ,copyright1 #aijd1 by ,,jennings ,,and ,,pye ,,preface ,this little book contains the larger part of an address ,i have delivered at several ,annual ,conferences on the occasion of the admission of probationary ministers into full membership4 ,at the suggestion of some who have heard it when delivered and whose assurance that it would be useful in print ,i am bound to respect1 ,i have consented to its publication4 ,matter not directly relating to the theme1 but of sufficient importance to accompany it in addressing an ,annual ,conference1 is here omitted1 that all possible space might be given to the discussion of the question1 ,how much ,christian doctrine will still remain1 though much of the most radical criticism be accepted8 ,preface ,it will be understood that concessions made for the sake of the argument by no means represent my own views of that which must be ultimately yielded to the critical spirit4 ,already some opinions which threatened the authority of ,gospels and ,epistles1 and which have had wide acceptance1 have been modified or withdrawn4 ,my aim in this address was not to scout criticism1 from which much of the highest value to faith is to come1 but to steady the wavering young minister2 to sustain his preaching power by helping him to a definite message1 and to encourage him to a slow and guarded acceptance of critical opinions destructive of the faith once delivered to the saints4 ,,chattanooga1 ,,tenn41 ,december1 #aijc4 ,the ,things ,which ,remain ,the followers of ,him who said ,i am the ,truth can never afford to hold or propagate that which is false4 ,no man can preach with power unless he strongly believes4 ,teaching force depends on ,faith4 ,sidenote3 ,doing and ,knowing4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,divine ,call4 ,sidenote3 ,conditions of the ,call4 ,thus far our ministry has had teaching power because it has been founded on and inspired by a ,christian experience4 ,our ,church has always emphasized that essential ,christian statement1 ,if ye do ye shall know4 ,at every ordination we have demanded of every candidate a declaration of his persuasion that he was called according to the will of our ,lord ,jesus ,christ to the particular office to which he was then to be advanced4 ,by this we do not mean a mediate call through the order of the ,church or the judgment of the ,bishop1 but an immediate call by the ,holy ,spirit from ,christ ,himself4 ,this call is antedated by that personal surrender to ,jesus ,christ2 that blessed acceptance by ,him of the self-surrendered2 that witnessing ,spirit as to sonship which brings the consciousness of pardon1 renewal1 and justification known as a religious experience4 ,sidenote3 ,evidence of the ,call4 ,those who possess this know something4 ,whereas they were once blind1 now they see4 ,they know they have passed from darkness to light through the changed love which now controls4 ,however the persuasion reached them1 it is a persuasion2 not merely a hope4 ,it is a conclusion borne in upon them by satisfactory evidence1 and is a lasting certainty while the faith which brought it abides in its original measure4 ,thus to-day we have a pulpit substantially in doctrine and force what our pulpit always has been4 ,even in some cases where doubt has entered1 it would appear that this ,christian experience has steadied the wavering head by the full and regular impulses of the believing heart4 ,sidenote3 ,new ,problems in ,theology4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,modern ,skeptical ,temper4 ,it is1 however1 to be admitted that the years to which we have come bring with them problems which our fathers did not have to solve4 ,doubts of which they knew nothing throng our atmosphere and crowd upon our consciousness4 ,the attacks on ,christianity are no longer the ribald jeers of the unlovely and the vile4 ,they come in the name of honest investigation1 historical veracity1 and scientific accuracy2 and are projected by characters apparently truth-loving1 reverent1 and candid4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,sources of ,advanced ,criticism4 ,this may be said for most of them1 but on occasion it is hard to believe that all the ,german critics are wholly and exclusively truth-loving and candid4 ,so extreme are the positions of some1 so evidently tinctured with overreadiness for criticism and unbelief1 that they must be excluded from the most above described4 ,i speak of the ,germans because they1 chiefly1 are those capable and active in original research4 ,most of our ,american advanced critics are merely translators and adapters of ,german work4 ,their volumes add nothing to the controversy to those who know the ,german originals4 ,not a few ,americans have obtained reputation by the expansion of the note books they made at the feet of ,german professors4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,english ,disciples of the ,german ,school4 ,sidenote3 ,love of ,novelty4 ,this also is largely true of the ,english critics4 ,many of them are well furnished for ,greek criticism4 ,the number of ,greek ,englishmen is still very large4 ,but these seem also to fortify1 at least1 their own conclusions by the opinions of the original ,german investigators4 ,it is hard to believe that1 in the contests for ,german professorial position1 as well as in the justification of the incumbent when the position is gained1 the desire to attract attention by some critical novelty of method or result has not been in some cases1 at least1 as influential as a simple love of truth4 ,sidenote3 ,some ,questions as to ,style4 ,there is always the question also1 which ,i profess seems to be one not easy of answer1 whether the literary judgments as to style when men are dealing with another language than their own1 and especially with ,greek and ,hebrew1 can be as worthy of acceptance as their authors and many others hold them to be2 whether1 in short1 their opinions may not1 like those of experts in handwriting1 come to be so colored by their personality1 or their interests1 as to be of little evidential value4 ,on this point it seems to me that not enough allowance has been made by these critics for the difference in style when men write familiarly or didactically1 or when they are engaged in narration or exhortation4 ,sidenote3 ,foundation of ,belief ,unsettled4 ,whatever may be the truth as to these matters1 the present state of faith is due to the unsettlement of the foundation of belief by scientific and critical scholarship4 ,sidenote3 ,a ,new ,foundation to ,emerge4 ,this unsettlement1 admitted on every hand with difference of opinion as to extent1 is either to increase until faith in ,christianity1 except as an ethical and humanitarian system1 is dead1 or abide until faith revives by a perception that the ,church has maintained an erroneous basis for faith and that a new and stronger one is emerging from the sea of discussion4 ,this last ,i believe to be the truth in the matter4 ,i hold1 therefore1 that faith is not dying1 but suffering in some minds from a kind of lunar eclipse1 where a shadow diminishes1 temporarily1 the radiance1 but does not extinguish the planet itself4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,authority of the ,scriptures ,weakened4 ,when we ask what foundation is weakened1 the answer is3 ,the authority of the ,scriptures as the sole rule of faith and practice4 ,some claim that only a few of the books are genuine and almost none authentic4 ,if this is to be the final judgment of the learned and the sincere1 it is plain that we must seek another foundation for faith than the word of ,scripture4 ,it is no more a ,thus saith the ,lord for us4 ,sidenote3 ,critics not yet ,agreed4 ,sidenote3 ,archology and the ,bible4 ,sidenote3 ,personal ,standpoints4 ,but we are very far from seeing that final agreement among the critics which warrants us in discarding a single book4 ,if any one has been fought about1 and fought over1 it is the ,gospel of ,john4 ,it used to be said that this was not a history at all1 but an idealizing of tradition in the interest of a speculative idea2#a now theologians are mostly agreed that if ,john is the most speculative1 he is1 at the same time1 the most personal of ,new ,testament writers4 ,no other book has been finally overthrown4 ,archology has confirmed ,paul1 and also some ,old ,testament writers1 especially those who speak of widely separated settlements of the ,hittites4 ,i get a strong impression that the ,new ,testament writers are sometimes attacked because they teach what the critics do not wish to believe4 ,thus it would appear that ,harnack scouts the early chapters of ,matthew and ,luke because he doubts the virgin birth1 and would hold that belief therein is no part in authority or value of the ,christian religion4 ,footnote #a3 ,denney4 ,studies in ,theology4 ,sidenote3 ,bible ,appeal for ,verification4 ,sidenote3 ,gracious ,ability4 ,sidenote3 ,huxley's ,passionless ,impersonality4 ,sidenote3 ,gracious ,conditions for ,belief4 ,sidenote3 ,ethical ,conditions for ,faith4 ,i now wish to declare my own confidence that the verification of the truths contained in the ,new ,testament was never intended to rest upon an absolutely inerrant record or on an inspiration which dictated to a personality rather than expressed itself through a personality4 ,the ,bible presupposes a power in man to test and verify its statements and doctrines4 ,it makes its appeal to this steadily from the earlier books to the later2 the appeal growing in content as the soul has developed its power of recognition4 ,this is the familiar law of knowing and doing1 of proving by practice1 of perceiving the leadership of ,jesus ,christ through the leading of the ,holy ,ghost4 ,as to doctrine1 there is left in man the power to make the beginning of a faith4 ,on this beginning devotion builds a belief in the greater mysteries4 ,thus reason deduces a ,first ,cause1 then the unity of the ,first ,cause4 ,this is as far as reason can go4 ,huxley1 looking out on the universe with this power1 said3 ,there is an impassable gulf between anthropomorphism1 however refined and the passionless impersonality underlying the thin veil of phenomena4 ,i can not see one tittle of evidence that the great unknown stands to us in the light of a ,father4 ,nor could he4 ,religious truth is conditioned in a way in which the apprehension of physical truth is not4 ,there must be a certain condition of the heart1 conscience1 and will to see the truth of the ,godhead of ,christ4 ,one may resist this evidence4#b ,only a living ,christian is competent to look at the subject--unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of ,god4 ,in physics nothing is needed but open eyes and a sound understanding4#c ,moral character has nothing to do with it1 except as vice may affect vision and deteriorate the judgment4 ,but in a soul's relation to the ,christian religion1 the ethical element is that which is fundamental4 ,the pure in heart shall see ,god4 ,the foul soul has no vision for the eternal purities4 ,in the days of idolatry there was no open vision4 ,so in the heart of sin there is no light of spiritual truth4 ,the higher verities appear fully founded to the ,christian consciousness only4 ,footnote #b3 ,cf4 ,denney4 ,footnote #c3 ,cf4 ,denney4 ,sidenote3 ,natural ,ethical ,canon4 ,yet1 let us remember that below this ,christian consciousness lie the substrata of reason and ethical canon common to all men4 ,religious truth rests on these in its first revelations4 ,above the first and simplest revelation1 truth rests on ,christian experience as to those matters for which reason and natural ethical canon are insufficient4 ,sidenote3 ,general ,calm of ,methodist ,episcopal ,church4 ,sidenote3 ,wesley's ,advanced ,views4 ,this having been the teaching of the ,methodist ,episcopal ,church from the beginning1 she has been little disturbed by the critical school4 ,while holding that the ,bible is the sole rule of faith1 she has not committed herself to any one theory of inspiration4 ,she has not believed the ,scriptures because they are written1 but1 being written1 she has found them true4 ,she has believed in the supernatural power of the ,gospel because in her sight its leaven has wrought in the individual and in society what it claims for itself4 ,john ,wesley believed that there were ,god-breathed teachings outside of the ,bible4 ,he believed this because of his feeling that the ,divine ,fatherhood must have spoken to other than ,his ,jewish children4 ,inheriting from our founder these thoughts1 we have kept a high degree of calm in these later days of inquiry and doubt4 ,sidenote3 ,wide ,range of ,unbelief4 ,sidenote3 ,natural ,immortality4 ,sidenote3 ,reward and ,punishments4 ,we have already admitted that the present tendency to unbelief has wider range and fresher foundations than our fathers knew4 ,the belief in the natural immortality of the human soul whether of ,platonic or ,christian origin is shaken to an extent not known in a century4 ,the doubts of ,huxley1 the denials of ,hckel had a purely scientific basis4 ,the suspension of consciousness by sleep1 by accident1 by drugs1 the decay of mind by old age and by disease are freely put forth as proofs that mind can not exist without the mechanism which supports and manifests it4 ,if this last be true a doctrine fundamental to ,christianity must be abandoned4 ,the doctrine of immortality through ,christ does not meet the new objections4 ,the scheme of redemption and the doctrine of future rewards and punishments are involved in the fate of the doctrine of natural immortality4 ,we have thus shadows of doubt thrown upon two great doctrines1 the virgin birth of ,christ and natural immortality4 ,the miracles1 ,resurrection1 and ,ascension must be added to the shadowed list4 ,sidenote3 ,some ,influential ,facts4 ,sidenote3 ,a ,great ,mistake4 ,sidenote3 ,doctored ,heathenism4 ,whatever relation the fact may have as a cause1 it is noteworthy that as to time1 this new era of doubt largely coincides as to its beginning with the movement to revise the ,new ,testament4 ,the variations of the manuscripts1 the interpretations1 the comparatively late date of the oldest manuscripts were before this in possession of scholars only4 ,the daily press have made them the possession of the ,christian world4 ,the shock to traditional confidence through this was very great4 ,the ,congress of ,religions at ,chicago had a similar effect4 ,the mistaken liberality which permitted ,christianity to appear on the same platform with the ethnic and imperfect religions contributed largely to doctrinal indifference4 ,the taking and uncandid misrepresentations of these religions convinced many that there was at least no better foundation for ,christianity and no better content therein than for and in the false and imperfect faiths4 ,many of these were defended by men who had had an ,english education and had come into contact with ,christian vocabulary and civilization4 ,they did not hesitate to read into these religions ideas wholly ,christian and wholly foreign to the original teachings4 ,sidenote3 ,what ,remains8 ,these and other considerations lead me to ask what remains that we may and do believe8 ,while far from admitting as finally proved the radical conclusions reached by some as to authorship and inspiration of the ,bible and ,divine authority for doctrines deduced therefrom1 it must be profitable for us to ask1 ,what remains if some of these conclusions stand8 ,recall that ,i do not admit all these for a moment1 or any of them as final4 ,some are probably true4 ,but taking the worst and most iconoclastic as true1 are we compelled even then to surrender our ,christian faith8 ,sidenote3 ,the ,apostles' ,creed4 ,let us take the separate articles of the ,apostles' ,creed and see how they stand affected3 ,sidenote3 ,the ,fatherhood of ,god4 ,i believe in ,god the ,father ,almighty1 ,maker of heaven and earth4 ,sidenote3 ,a ,christian ,god4 ,surely this remains untouched and in full force4 ,huxley1 to requote what has before been quoted1 says3 ,i can not see one tittle of evidence that the great unknown stands to us in the light of a ,father4 ,what a contradiction is here6 ,he knows that the great unknown can not be proved to be our ,father4 ,then he must know of the great unknown the negative aspects so minutely as to be sure that no ,fatherhood is in the great unknown4 ,then he knows the great unknown much better than he is willing to admit1 better than an agnostic ought4 ,sidenote3 ,an ,all ,pervasive ,spirit4 ,sidenote3 ,his ,commandments4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,divine ,ideal4 ,yet that the idea of ,god may remain in power and not as a passionless impersonality1 it must be less interpreted by the teachings of ,moses and more by the teachings of ,christ4 ,human tempers and passions must be eliminated from our ,divine ,ideal4 ,he must not be made an angry and jealous ,god as men count these4 ,he must not be thought of as a vindictive personality1 never so well pleased as when scaring ,his children into panic4 ,in the thought of the ,church ,he will be an all-pervasive ,spirit whose nature is unfolded by the universe ,he has made4 ,in that universe ,he will be felt to be immanent as the power of development1 order1 and destiny4 ,all ages show ,him to be the power which makes for righteousness4 ,the commandments are not only ,his because they are found in the ,bible1 but because they are perceived to be necessary laws of conduct proceeding from such a ,being as we know ,god to be for such beings as we know men to be4 ,thus we perceive them to be the ,divinely authorized bond of society and the guarantee and obligation of the ,divine ,ideal of humanity4 ,all nature and all history are scrutinized for traces of the ,supreme4 ,these being found to coincide with the ,christian ,revelation of ,him1 men will read with new reverence those wonderful books which make up the ,book1 and which beyond all others anticipate the latest results of scientific inquiry and natural ethical canon4 ,sidenote3 ,advantage of ,newer ,view4 ,out of this will come such a sense of the ,divine ,presence as the ,church and the individual ,christian have not hitherto known4 ,moral distance from ,god will be the only distance4 ,in ,him we live and move and have our being comes to full interpretation through this thought of ,god4 ,humanity is immersed in ,him4 ,sidenote3 ,transcendent4 ,sidenote3 ,huxley ,against ,hume4 ,but this immanent ,god is also seen to be transcendent4 ,he is in nature and far beyond it4 ,vast as nature is1 it is limited4 ,god is the unlimited4 ,within this region of transcendence is room for all ,his gracious activities as distinguished from ,his natural activities2 room for marvel and miracle if ,he will and we need4 ,when ,huxley abandons ,hume's a priori argument against miracles it is not worth while for others to use it4 ,fewer doubt the existence of a ,god1 ,i believe1 than at any time since men sought to prove that ,he does not exist4 ,the ,fatherly in ,god is proved both by ,his work in nature and by those works of grace which the student of nature alone can not see4 ,god is a spirit4 ,the human spirit refined1 purified1 sees ,him in proportion to its purification4 ,sidenote3 ,modern ,christology4 ,sidenote3 ,former ,limitations4 ,sidenote3 ,ritual ,statement4 ,sidenote3 ,aim of ,christianity4 ,sidenote3 ,likeness to ,god4 ,in respect of ,jesus ,christ1 ,his only ,son our ,lord1 it may1 it must1 be said ,he remains in full and glorious vigor as the ,redeemer of mankind4 ,the marked difference between our time and a half-century ago with respect to ,christ is in the extension1 rather than the diminution of ,his relation to salvation and the extension of the idea of salvation itself4 ,in the former days men's eyes were almost wholly fixed on ,his death and its relation to salvation in the future life4 ,seldom indeed was the value of the following text taken into consideration3 ,for if when we were enemies we were reconciled to ,god by the death of ,his ,son1 much more being reconciled we shall be saved by ,his life4 ,there is less disposition to dogmatize as to theories of the atonement4 ,most1 ,i think1 come to feel that no one view contains the full significance of ,christ's death4 ,have you noticed how the ,ritual puts it in the order of the ,lord's ,supper8 ,didst give ,thine only ,son ,jesus ,christ to suffer death upon the cross for our ,redemption2 who made there on the cross by ,his oblation of ,himself once offered a full1 perfect1 and sufficient sacrifice1 oblation1 and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world4 ,the men who wrote that struggled to interpret ,his death by every possible phase of its meaning4 ,in our time we have come to see that the aim of ,christ and ,christianity is to develop character and that this must be gained in time that we may be ready for eternity4 ,thus the death of ,christ as the ultimate of self-sacrifice persuades us to the death of sin in us that we may live renewed in ,god2 rise from our dead selves to higher things4 ,his life persuades us as the condition and example of growth to move on from the first self-surrender into the habit and fact of constant obedience and therefore into the likeness of ,god's dear ,son4 ,the consciousness1 well-nigh universal1 of the nobility of self-sacrifice is that which gives vitality and vogue among the masses to the doctrine of the atonement4 ,self-sacrifice becomes more rare as wealth and refinement modify men and women4 ,he that has much is loath to lose or leave it4 ,hence the rich generally fight in security4 ,the poor meet the bullets first4 ,bad as is the conduct of some trades-unionists1 it is among these toilers that great deeds of sympathy and generosity are done4 ,how they tax themselves to help each other6 ,how their women work for each other when one is unable to care for herself or her children6 ,their doctrine that an injury to one is a wrong to all has much that is ,christlike in it4 ,let us who believe in an atoning ,christ rejoice that as long as men honor bravery--self-sacrifice unto death for country1 home1 or the life of dear ones2 as long as they build monuments to generals1 soldiers1 firemen1 physicians who die for others1 so will the world be slow to disbelieve the doctrine that ,jesus ,christ tasted death for every man4 ,sidenote3 ,john's ,logos4 ,sidenote3 ,an ,anthropomorphic ,god4 ,more1 too1 is made of ,his life before the ,incarnation4 ,the pre-existence of ,christ is an essential element in ,christianity4 ,his eternal relation to ,god is the only way of conceiving ,him which answers to ,his real greatness4#d ,the ,christ was present and active in the creation4 ,john's use of the word ,logos is right4 ,logos is not merely a result but a ,force4 ,it is not only the speech1 but the speaker4 ,let us admit once for all that the fact1 much belabored of the critics1 is a fact4 ,let us not be afraid of the word which expresses it4 ,god must be anthropomorphic if ,he exists4 ,we can come nowhere near to thinking out any other kind of ,god4 ,christ has the value of ,god to devout ,christians because in the fullness of ,his moral perfections ,he expresses ,god so far as we can know ,him and man so far as man can hope and grow4 ,footnote #d3 ,denney4 ,studies in ,theology4 ,sidenote3 ,how ,son of ,god4 ,is ,his ,sonship different from ours1 or only an expansion of the fullness and perfection of our sonship8 ,this last seems to me a most important question4 ,if ,he was born as we were born--that is1 as to the beginning of ,his earthly life1 there can be no pre-eminent sense in which ,he was the ,son of ,god4 ,he was either a happy accident of natural birth or a sport in evolution4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,virgin ,birth4 ,this brings us to that doctrine which is the greatest challenge to the doubter3 ,conceived by the ,holy ,ghost2 born of the ,virgin ,mary1--a doctrine fiercely fought by ,harnack and yet by no means to be dismissed as he dismisses it4 ,his teaching on this point seems to me the result of his theory of ,christianity4 ,if one seeks to rid ,christianity of the supernatural1 here is the place to begin4 ,sidenote3 ,dignity of the ,story4 ,sidenote3 ,a ,greater ,puzzle4 ,but who will not feel the force of the position that1 granted ,god was to be incarnate1 the story of ,christ's incarnation is the noblest and most probable8 ,he is not born of a man's lust nor of a woman's desire--but of the submission of untainted womanhood to the direct creative power of ,god4 ,the alternative to this is the ,divinest man in all the world born of sinning and not yet married parents4 ,if the new doctrine of heredity be true that men may inherit good as well as evil1 we still have an astounding fact to account for2 namely1 the birth of such a child from such conditions1 that is1 with all the good kept in and all the bad left out4 ,sidenote3 ,parthenogenesis a ,fact4 ,when men speak of a virgin birth as incredible and impossible and as the weakest of all ,christian doctrine1 do they know or have they forgotten that parthenogenesis 7virgin birth7 is a fact in nature2 existing1 for example1 in as highly organized insects as the honey bee8 ,there are other insects which are parthenogenetic at one time and sexually productive at another4 ,there are also hints of it in human life known to anatomists which can not be fully discussed here4 ,sidenote3 ,among the ,bees4 ,sidenote3 ,a ,small ,departure from ,nature4 ,the virgin queen bee produces males in abundance1 but can not produce females until she has made her nuptial flight and met her mate in an embrace invariably fatal to him4 ,nor does she ever need to meet another4 ,from that time on1 she is the fruitful mother of every kind of bee life the hive needs2 the undeveloped females called neuters and those who become queens by being fed on royal food4 ,virgin birth is therefore imbedded in nature's order4 ,to occur in the human species nature need call in no novelty4 ,christ1 if born of a virgin1 was born with the smallest possible departure from the order of nature4 ,a process known in a lower form of life was carried into the higher to produce the unique being called for by the spiritual needs of mankind4 99 99 99 99 99 ,sidenote3 ,the ,historical ,statement4 ,passing over the historical assertions which follow the doctrine of the virgin birth1 suffered under ,pontius ,pilate1 was crucified1 dead1 and buried1 because there is nothing in these statements difficult or incredible1 we reach the doctrine of ,his resurrection1 the third day ,he rose from the dead1 a doctrine next to that of the virgin birth in natural difficulty of acceptance4 ,sidenote3 ,christ's ,resurrection4 ,sidenote3 ,surprise of ,disciples4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,fact ,accounts for ,history4 ,faith in this seems to me to depend on how far we have accepted ,christ's ,deity and ,his incarnation4 ,if by the ,holy ,ghost we have been able to say that ,jesus is the ,lord2 if by that blessed energy we perceive ,his ,divine mastership2 if by the same energy we feel that ,he has transformed us into the image of ,his dear ,son2 raising us from the death of sin into the life of righteousness it is not difficult to believe that ,jesus the power of the ,resurrection rose from the dead4 ,the fact of the ,resurrection and belief in the fact is not explicable by any antecedent conditions apart from its truth4#e ,the disciples did not expect what they saw4 ,his death was for them so far as we can see1 without hope4 ,they were not able yet to interpret ,his prophecy that ,he would build again ,his temple1 nor understand the spirituality of ,his kingdom4 ,these facts seem to me utterly to demolish the theory of a vision called up by eager1 yea1 agonizing1 expectation4 ,the idea of the ,resurrection justifies ,his prophecies as to ,himself and the fact accounts1 better than any theory which denies the fact1 for the faith and founding of the early ,church as well as for the course of subsequent history and of the believer's experience4 ,footnote #e3 ,westcott4 ,the ,revelation of the ,risen ,lord4 99 99 99 99 99 ,sidenote3 ,slow ,belief in ,resurrection4 ,it is much to see that belief became belief only with great difficulty4 ,the idea of the ,resurrection was strange and alarming to the disciples4 ,they were terrified and affrighted and supposed they beheld a spirit4 ,slowly by tests of sense as well as by persuasions of teaching did the disciples come to believe that the ,christ of the ,resurrection was the same ,christ who suffered on the cross4 ,sidenote3 ,not an ,invention4 ,sidenote3 ,an ,eye-witness ,story4 ,it seems impossible that the ,resurrection could have been an invention or that the account of it could be a work of the imagination4 ,the last is almost as great a miracle as the ,resurrection itself4 ,in detail1 in naturalness1 even in the presence of difficulties and hindrances to easy belief of the story1 the narrative seems that of an eye-witness4 ,no reasoning can bring faith1 however1 to one who denies the miraculous4 ,as a fact1 the ,resurrection is incapable of naturalistic explanation4 ,to those who deny the miraculous ,i can only again point out how ,huxley cuts out the a priori argument from ,hume as worthless4 ,as quoted in his biography1 ,huxley says3 ,we are not justified in the a priori assertion that the order of nature1 as experience has revealed it to us1 can not change4 ,the assumption is illegitimate because it involves the whole point in dispute4 99 99 99 99 99 ,sidenote3 ,ascent into ,heaven4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,ascension4 ,sidenote3 ,nature not ,wholly ,love4 ,sidenote3 ,evil and ,good4 ,necessarily miraculous also is the doctrine1 ,he ascended into heaven4 ,in this ,he passed from the visible into the invisible2 from the conditions of human life to those of the life of a spirit2 from the work of redemption to that of intercession4 ,if ,his resurrection be accepted1 ,his ascension presents no difficulties to faith4 ,this1 with ,his incarnation1 and the facts of ,his earthly life are the manifestation of the tender side of ,god to the senses even as ,his wisdom and power are shown to the senses by the facts and laws of nature4 ,as to the doctrine1 ,god is love1 nature's word can never be conclusive4 ,in the natural kingdom joy and sorrow1 ease and pain1 love and hate1 kindness and cruelty1 trust and terror exist side by side1 as do life and death4 ,no man concludes1 from nature alone1 that ,god is ruled by love4 ,because man can not conclude this1 ,ormuzd and ,ahriman are found substantially in all religions1 as in that of the ,parsees1 except in the ,christian4 ,here the warfare is not to be eternal4 ,the victory of good is to come4 ,divine help is promised1 that it may be secured in every soul4 ,the conquest of evil by good is within that ,christian omnipotence which ,paul knew4 ,i can do all things through ,christ who strengtheneth me4 ,it requires a ,christ to show that the path to rest is through toil2 that the way to ease is through suffering2 that the highway to life passes through death4 ,only thus can mortality be swallowed up of life4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,meaning of ,jesus4 ,sidenote3 ,christ as ,revealer4 ,in the unity of the ,godhead1 ,christ is ,god in manifestation1 redemption1 intercession1 judgment4 ,in the ,trinity1 in which we must believe ,god exists1 ,jesus ,christ is the personality expressive1 at first visibly and now invisibly1 of the tender qualities of the ,divine nature which1 manifested in part in the world of nature1 are there so linked with severity as to require special and peculiar revelation in the person of ,jesus ,christ in order that ,god may be understood both as transcending nature and as eternal love4 99 99 99 99 99 ,surely the doctrine1 ,i believe in the ,holy ,ghost1 will remain4 ,it is a misfortune that the word ghost has1 in our ,english use1 an unworthy and terrifying significance4 ,on this account it were well if we could substitute for constant use the word ,spirit4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,holy ,ghost4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,energy of ,god4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,interpreter4 ,the ,holy ,spirit is the energy of ,god1 whether working as ,creator or in the processes of redemption4 ,it stirs us to the depths when we consider that the ,author of the worlds1 the ,source of the energies is ,he who transforms1 renews1 sanctifies1 and witnesses in us4 ,there is no question as to the pervasiveness and competence of the ,power which works in us to will and to do of ,his good pleasure4 ,we are taught to trace all our religious uplift to the highest possible source4 ,we gather a great sense of our worth by the dignity of this association as we do of the condescension of our ,lord in making ,his home in our hearts4 ,this ,holy ,spirit is in all ,christians the energy of the entire spiritual life4 ,by this we do the things which by nature we can not do4 ,his is that ,divine impulse which initiates1 continues1 matures1 and satisfies the life of ,god in us4 ,it is the indwelling1 all-pervading ,holy ,spirit1 which interprets that great word1 ,i in them and ,thou in ,me1 that they may be one as ,we are4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,doctrine of ,energy4 ,and if the most advanced philosophy should yet be confirmed as true that there is nothing really but energy1 none the less would the doctrine of the ,holy ,spirit abide4 ,back of all the individual energies of humanity2 back of all the forces of nature is the supreme energy of ,god4 ,if creation be our theory1 it is the ,spirit of ,god which broods on the face of the waters4 ,if evolution be our creed1 it is in ,him we live and move and have our being4 ,all science is but the knowing of ,his way of working1 and all theology is but the discovery of ,his mind4 ,to know ,him is to know all things4 ,the latest ,christian will be saying1 ,i believe in the ,holy ,ghost4 99 99 99 99 99 ,sidenote3 ,the ,forgiveness of ,sin4 ,sidenote3 ,huxley on ,depravity4 ,sidenote3 ,not ,all ,born ,good4 ,sidenote3 ,experience of ,hell4 ,and what becomes of the doctrine of the forgiveness of sins in this outlook for the things which remain8 ,accepting ,huxley as the incarnation of the skeptical spirit of our time1 ,i quote from him his thought of sin1 depravity1 and punishment1 as a hint of where the scientific spirit may yet aid us4 ,the doctrine of predestination1 of original sin1 of the innate depravity of man1 the evil fate of the greater part of the race1 of the primacy of ,satan in this world1 of the essential vileness of matter1 of a malevolent ,demiurgos subordinate to a benevolent ,almighty who has only lately revealed ,himself1 faulty as they are1 appear to me to be vastly nearer the truth than the liberal1 popular illusions that babies are all born good1 and that the example of corrupt society is responsible for their failure to remain so4444 ,that it is given to everybody to reach the ethical ideal if they will only try2 that all partial evil is universal good2 and other optimistic figments4 ,i suppose that all men with a clear sense of right and wrong have descended into hell and stopped there quite long enough to know what infinite punishment means4 ,sidenote3 ,transmission of ,evil4 ,surely1 the established truths of heredity confirm the doctrine that man1 if not born depraved1 is born deprived of tendencies toward good essential to his own welfare and that of the race4 ,where sin has once taken hold of the race1 the natural reproduction of life become reproduction of life morally injured and faulty4 ,with evil once begun1 the race is a succession of tainted individuals2 an organism that works toward continuance of evil4 ,not but that good is transmitted at the same time1 for it goes along with evil4 ,any virtue or value which is strong enough to live will pass from generation to generation even while evil is making the same journey4#f ,footnote #f3 ,outline of ,christian ,theology4 ,clarke1 p4 #bdb4 ,sidenote3 ,depravation and ,deprivation4 ,sidenote3 ,natural ,standards4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,decalogue4 ,while we hold that this tendency1 this natural sluggishness in laying hold of the things of the higher nature is not in itself guilt1 it becomes so by the voluntary adoption of the lower forces as the guide of life4 ,nature has her own decalogue4 ,there is a law written upon our hearts4 ,the wasting of power by anger1 jealousy1 envy1 covetousness and the like1 and the degradation following their expression in acts of revenge1 concupiscence1 and mere rapacity1 are known without revelation by all races which have not suffered the downward evolution4 ,the literatures prove this back even to the days of ,hamurabi4 ,thus natural standards of temper and conduct are seen to exist1 below which men may not live without loss1 and hence there are natural laws to disobey which is sin4 ,the table given on ,sinai1 though given to ,moses1 was in the world long before ,moses4 ,but higher sanction was given it by the lawgiver1 and the highest by the re-enactment of the ,decalogue by ,jesus ,christ4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,heart ,law4 ,sidenote3 ,effects of ,sin4 ,sidenote3 ,characteristics of ,sin4 ,sidenote3 ,results of ,sin4 ,sin is blameworthy because it is born of the human preference and the human will4 ,the nation which1 knowing most of the ,divine will1 disobeys1 is the most guilty because the most knowing4 ,the proportion of guilt depends on the measure of knowledge and the measure of opportunity4 ,hence there is some guilt among those who know only a part of the truth1 and if a man perceives1 without the aid of revelation1 a law in nature and a penalty1 and breaks that law1 then is he a sinner4 ,some of the physical consequences may apparently be avoided by future obedience4 ,but the inner and spiritual consequences of sin are the worst--these things2 namely3 ,in the weakening of the will2 in the hardening of the conscience2 and1 later1 in the recklessness as to consequences1 indicated by that terrible indictment by ,paul1 ,who1 being past feeling1 have given themselves over4 ,the consciousness of sin is practically universal4 ,it is no invention of ,christianity1 though brought to its greatest force by ,christianity4 ,religions1 governments1 literatures1--all and everywhere1--treat of sin as a fact4 ,it is more than dominion of body over spirit2 more than an incident of growth2 more than a result of undeveloped judgment1 tinged with emotion1 and applied to questions of motive and conduct4 ,sin is the abnormal2 sin is a variant from standard2 sin is self-will and selfishness throttling duty4 ,where men accept a ,god1 it is opposition to ,his law and government4#g ,if no personal ,god be believed in1 then sin is willful opposition to the course of nature and to law1 as proved by experience4 ,so1 in every case1 it is unworthy1 injurious1 and guilty1 and must be repented of and atoned for4 ,the doctrine of sin will never be essentially disturbed4 ,footnote #g3 ,cf4 ,clarke4 ,outline of ,theology4 99 99 99 99 99 ,sidenote3 ,a ,supernatural ,event4 ,sidenote3 ,lacks ,scientific ,proof4 ,sidenote3 ,an ,old ,fallacy4 ,sidenote3 ,a ,jewish ,argument4 ,sidenote3 ,kant's ,reasoning4 ,sidenote3 ,can ,not ,be ,demonstrated4 ,the next clause in the creed1 ,the resurrection of the body1 if it remains as a permanent article of faith1 must rest on the declaration of ,christ and on ,his resurrection4 ,it is confessedly dependent1 not on a natural1 but a supernatural order4 ,on this point it is again worth our while to note a concession by ,huxley1 as showing the consistency of one ,christian truth with another4 ,if a genuine1 and not merely subjective1 immortality awaits us1 ,i conceive that without some such change as that depicted in ,i ,corinthians xv1 immortality must be eternal misery4#h ,surely1 this is a great testimony to that famous chapter on the resurrection4 ,no scientific proof or probability can be adduced for the resurrection of the body4 ,the older theologians used to point out that the caterpillar entombed itself that it might emerge to the higher life of the butterfly4 ,but we must not take from such a fact what suits our purpose1 and leave a fatal weakness in our argument4 ,the butterfly does1 indeed1 emerge from the coffin of the cocoon and the seemingly dead pupa4 ,but it is only for a brief day of life4 ,then it lays its eggs and dies forever4 ,it is born to no immortality1 but to the most ephemeral life4 ,the early ,church2 yea1 the ,jewish ,church1 found rational warrant for belief in immortality and the resurrection of the body1 first in the thought that it was unjust for those who fought for and brought in the kingdom of ,god1 to enjoy nothing of what they secured4 ,so the doctrine of the first resurrection appears as a contribution of justice to holy life4 ,later on1 similar reasoning demanded the resurrection of all4 ,a judgment is necessary1 not to acquaint ,god with the merits of men1 but to acquaint men with the righteousness of ,god4 ,this would be impossible without the resurrection of all4 ,very close to this is the reasoning of ,kant1 summarized as follows3 ,every moral act must have as an end the highest good4 ,this good consists of two elements1 virtue and felicity1 or happiness4 ,the two are inseparable4 ,but these can not be realized under the limitations of this existence4 ,immortality follows as a deduction4 ,the moral law demands perfect virtue or holiness2 but a moral being can not realize absolute moral perfection or a holy completeness of nature in this present life4 ,it is wholly of faith that men are immortal4 ,it of necessity can not be demonstrated4 ,the mass of mankind have believed it1 and do believe it1 and it is one of the most difficult of beliefs to escape from1 returning to some skeptical scientists almost as an intuition1 conquering the logic of death and decay4 ,footnote #h3 ,biography1 ,vol4 ,,ii4 p4 #cbb4 ,sidenote3 ,how ,faith ,grows4 ,it is also true that faith in immortality grows with the fullness and intelligence of the spiritual life4 ,it becomes a complete persuasion to the pure in heart4 ,yet some scientific facts1 as related to man1 make the idea of his extinction improbable1 and separate him from the beast which perisheth4 ,sidenote3 ,men and ,brutes4 ,sidenote3 ,what ,brutes ,have4 ,it is true that much is common to men and brutes4 ,they walk the same earth2 breathe the same air2 are nourished by the same food1 which is digested by the same processes4 ,their life is transmitted by the same methods1 and their embryonic life is strangely similar4 ,it is also true that there are strong mental resemblances4 ,both love and hate2 are jealous and indifferent2 are courageous and cowardly2 they perceive by similar organs2 record by similar mnemonic ganglia2 and are within certain limits impelled by the same motives4 ,nor can a measure of reason be denied to animals4 ,while much of what appears to be mental life is automatic and unconscious response to an external stimulus reaching a nerve-center1 yet within limits they deliberate2 they exercise choice2 and determine routes and methods4 ,sidenote3 ,man ,above ,brutes4 ,sidenote3 ,habits of ,animals4 ,sidenote3 ,limits of ,brute ,intelligence4 ,sidenote3 ,limits ,continued4 ,but when all this is said1 man rises almost infinitely beyond the highest brute4 ,man can stand outside of himself2 contemplate the movements of his own mind2 watch the play of motive upon energy and will1 and know himself as no brute can ever be trained to do4 ,nor have brutes the ganglia1 lobes1 or convolutions which house and direct such powers2 and no tribe of mankind has been found without them1 however undeveloped4 ,very limited1 indeed1 is the use of natural forces or of supplied materials in the life of a brute4 ,the birds pick up feathers1 hair1 twigs2 but no bird provides such things by deliberate prevision and co-operation with nature4 ,what animal sows that he may reap8 ,the so-called agricultural ants gather what they have not sown1 and reap what they have not planted4 ,man sows that he may gather2 breeds that he may use2 and accomplishes civilization by an ever-increasing mastery and adaptation of natural forces4 ,an insect may float with the current on a chip2 but what one ever put a chip into the water8 ,a beaver may build a dam2 but what beaver ever turned the heightened water on a wheel8 ,the dog may lie in a sunny spot2 but what dog ever created artificial heat or condensed by a lens the sun's heat on a particular point8 ,the hen may lay and incubate an egg2 but what hen ever invented an incubator to save her long sitting in one pose or place1 or studied the development of life in and from the egg she produced8 ,the ox may select the richest pasture2 but never dreamed of creating a rich pasture by the culture and fertilization of which he is the chief source4 ,the tiger chooses and slays his prey2 but does not know how to propagate1 develop1 and safely mature the animals on which he feeds4 ,all animal life below man must locate where its food abounds1 or follow that food in its migrations or seasonal changes4 ,man alone stores and transports his food1 creating commerce by his mastery of climate4 ,sidenote3 ,man ,parts ,company4 ,sidenote3 ,man and ,brute ,compared4 ,sidenote3 ,how ,man ,can ,live4 ,sidenote3 ,how ,man ,can ,decay4 ,sidenote3 ,incidental as to ,body4 ,the brute obeys law unwittingly in the sustenance and transmission of life4 ,man alone perceives and deduces law from a thousand facts1 and concludes a lawgiver from the law1 and one ,lord and ,giver of ,life from the unity and universality of force4 ,the brute turns its eye skyward to detect danger2 but never measures or counts the stars1 discerns the movements of the planets1 nor extends vision and hearing by telescope1 microscope1 and megaphone1 nor proves by the spectroscope the sameness of stellar elements with those of our own world4 ,the brute neither makes history nor records it4 ,he remembers1 but does not recollect4 ,his affections are evanescent as to his kind1 and only approach permanence as they are fastened upon us4 ,the brute cognizes external things1 but does not perceive their being4 ,thus man can live in an intellectual or spiritual world as to his aims1 motives1 and occupations4 ,he need touch matter only so far as it is necessary to support the bodily strength on which his spiritual and intellectual movement must depend for basis and manifestation4 ,on the other hand he may reduce the intellectual and spiritual life to the lowest limit by giving the mastery to his physical appetites4 ,we feel instinctively that to do this last is unworthy of manhood and destructive of the higher nature and intent4 ,but who expects a brute to do anything else but minister to his appetites8 ,if he delays a single second in doing it1 it is only through fear of man or of some stronger animal4 ,his intellectual movements have this as an end in complete reversal of the case with man4 ,with the brute the intellect seems incidental to the body4 ,with man the body is incidental to the intellect4 ,one feels for this reason that man might live a purely spiritual and disembodied life4 ,no one from this standpoint thinks so of a brute4 ,sidenote3 ,immortality of ,force4 ,sidenote3 ,christ's ,light4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,christian's ,eye4 ,once more let ,huxley speak as to the scientific possibility with regard to the other great ,christian dogmas1 the immortality of the soul1 and a future state of rewards and punishments1 what possible objection can ,i1 who am compelled1 perforce1 to believe in the immortality of what we call matter and force1 and in a very unmistakable present state of rewards and punishments for all our deeds1 have to these doctrines8 ,give me a scintilla of evidence1 and ,i am ready to jump at them4#i ,but when all conditions are considered1 and just weight given to all the probabilities1 the full persuasion of immortality comes through ,him who has brought life and immortality to light4 ,these seem part of ,his communication to the souls in whom ,he dwells4 ,to them ,he says1 ,because ,i live1 ye shall live also4 ,into their being ,he injects the power of an endless life4 ,their hopes1 faith1 affections center less and less on time4 ,the truer1 fuller1 richer life is felt to be coming4 ,it is to surpass the earthly life in quantity and in quality only because the soul1 as it flutters ,godward1 must here feel the attrition of its fleshly tabernacle4 ,this dissolved1 the fullness and the freedom come4 ,the house not made with hands henceforth enshrines the spirit4 ,christ's great ,word is finally interpreted3 ,i am come1 that they might have life1 and have it more abundantly4 ,footnote #i3 ,biography4 ,vol4 ,i1 p4 #bfj4 99 99 99 99 99 ,sidenote3 ,the ,life ,everlasting4 ,sidenote3 ,literalism4 ,the life everlasting6 ,this is the grand finale of the ,creed as it is the end which all devout souls seek4 ,it is made probable by what man is1 which is the same as saying that there are1 from considerations above mentioned1 probabilities in its favor4 ,it has been the habit of pious souls to attempt to understand and describe this life1 and many are the volumes which proceed upon the literalness of the ,bible descriptions4 ,i suppose there are phases of faith which can not reach beyond literalness1 and hence do not rightly interpret the splendid imagery of ,st4 ,john4 ,such we must leave to the blessed surprise and ecstatic awakening of ,paradise4 ,sidenote3 ,great ,figures4 ,sidenote3 ,locating ,heaven4 ,sidenote3 ,eternal ,punishment4 ,to other minds the life everlasting is unbelievable except as the great pictures of ,john are spiritualized4 ,to such the place becomes a state or condition4 ,it is of no interest to us to inquire1 as did the ,christian philosopher1 ,dick1 into the locality of heaven and hell4 ,such ideas as those recently put forth by a preacher1 not of our ,church1 thank ,god6 that hell is in one of the spots on the sun1 and heaven in the chromosphere are distasteful to the last degree to those who believe that ,god is a ,spirit1 and that flesh and blood can not inherit the kingdom of ,god4 ,such feel that heaven may be anywhere and everywhere2 that the gulf which separates the rich man and ,lazarus may be only a moral gulf1 seeing that they talked across it4 ,they see eternal punishment in the perception of the sinner that he has forever stunted his soul by his sinfullness and the grossness of his affections4 ,though he should begin a progressive life from his present status1 he could never catch up with a soul which has a purer point of departure4 ,there is an awful penalty in the fact that this sense of loss may be eternal4 ,the consciousness of limited powers1 the certainty that so much is lost1 never to be regained1 is surely a fire that is not quenched2 a worm that dieth not6 ,sidenote3 ,limitation by ,sin4 ,sidenote3 ,illustrations4 ,sidenote3 ,strength and ,disuse4 ,but how much more awful the thought that this limitation of the nature by sin1 whether of body or soul1 may affect the soul through unending life without fitness for any pleasure or delight possible to that state6 ,the company of good and refined men and women is here little less than hell to a bad and coarse man1 if he is compelled to stay in it4 ,there is nothing in the spirit1 aim1 and employments of such that he can measure4 ,he can understand the delights of eating and drinking4 ,even then it is the coarse foods and the drunk-bringing drink that he most enjoys4 ,he can understand noise1 coarse jokes1 but not quiet conversation1 nor the play of a delicate wit4 ,when the pleasure of life is sensual1 bodily1 the capacity for mental and moral pleasure slowly diminishes1 and at last dies4 ,project such a soul into the company of the redeemed2 place it where the body has no existence1 and therefore no pleasure to give2 compel it to remain among those whose every thought is pure1 and whose eyes are fixed on the ,king in ,his beauty1 and1 like the rich man1 it will lift its eyes in torment1 and ask for water to cool his parched tongue4 99 99 99 99 99 ,it is no part of my aim to say a final word on any of these great truths1 even if ,i deemed myself capable thereof4 ,sidenote3 ,aim and ,intent4 ,sidenote3 ,confirmation by ,experience4 ,sidenote3 ,effect on the ,bible4 ,sidenote3 ,the ,coming of ,revelation4 ,but it is my hope to point out the way in which we find our faith strengthened1 and to show that the great truths of ,christianity will survive the most radical criticism of the ,scriptures4 ,every one of these truths has increasing confirmation as we accumulate the teachings of science1 history1 and religious experience4 ,the ,bible will never be superseded1 because it contains the struggle of every type of soul ,godward1 and because its record of what the ,lord said and did2 of what ,he was1 and of what the apostles thought ,him to be1 stands as the verification of what we know ,him to be4 ,the ,bible and experience are mutually illuminating and corroborative4 ,it is possible that the ,church receiving the deposit of truth orally from the apostles1 might have passed that truth down orally1 and by her ordinances1 illustratively as she did1 until the ,gospels were written2 as she must do now in lands where the people can not read1 having no written language4 ,to avoid1 however1 the defects of human memory and to accumulate a standard by which teaching and experience should be verified1 ,god who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in times past unto the fathers1 hath in these last days spoken unto us by ,his ,son2 through ,his ,son to the apostles2 and by the apostles and their successors to us2 those successors being not those made so by the touch of a human hand2 but by ,god's transforming grace1 giving to every believer power and privilege to speak the things we do know4 ,we having the same spirit of faith2 according as it is written1 ,i believed1 and therefore have ,i spoken1 we also believe1 and therefore speak2 knowing that ,he which raised up the ,lord ,jesus1 shall raise us up also by ,jesus1 and shall present us with you4 ,for all things are for your sakes1 that the abundant grace might1 through the thanksgiving of many1 redound to the glory of ,god4