,copyright 7,c7 #bjjd by ,dor9 ,t4 ,moisa ,,! ,,bra91 ,a ,,decod$ ,,enigma ,dor9 ,t4 ,,moisa ,w>n+ ,?is book conta9s a symbolic model associat$ to ! basic h>dw>e function ( ! bra94 ,a symbolic model is a model bas$ on logic only4 ,s1 ?is book is n recomm5d$ to individuals :o has ! t5d5cy to und]/& ! ext]nal reality bas$ on imag9ation4 ,! book c be und]/& by p]sons betwe5 #ab & #bj ye>s old :o h special abilities 9 ! field ( positive sci5ces4 ,also1 ! book is recomm5d$ to p]sons :o already "w 9 ! field ( positive sci5ces 7ma!maticians1 phisici/s1 eng9e]s & s on74 ,,cont5t ,introduction ,ab/ract ,fundam5tal ,t]ms 7keywords7 ,def9itions associat$ ) ! basic t]ms ,! basic h>dw>e elem5ts ,"s pr9cipial problems ,h[ ,m-,,zm models are build ,! human bra9 7introduction7 ,! human bra9 v]sus animal bra9 ,human bra93 evolution or ext]nal int]v5tion ,basic design defici5cies ( ! human bra9 ,! /ructure ( ! bra91 ! ,,psm-model ,! /ructure ( ! bra93 functional facilities & types ( models ,p>anormal ph5om5a ,! normal human bra9 ,! ab/ract ( ! functional facilities ( ! bra9 ,! p]sonality 7human only7 ,! conci\sness ,ab/ract3 model diction>y ,example1 ,te/s1 ,aplications 7,e,t,as7 ,,eta #a3 ,! model ,,eta #b3 ,tru?1 reality1 communication ,,eta #c3 ,fundam5tal problems associat$ to sci5tific k ,,eta #d3 ,g5]al communication language 7,,gcl71 diction>y ( t]ms ,,eta #e3 ,,null model ,,eta #f3 ,"t ,,eta #g3 ,music ,,eta #h3 ,c9ematography ,,eta #i3 ,! fundam5talisms ( ! _w we live 9 ,,eta #aj3 ,t]rorism ,,eta #aa3 ,problems ( ! human bra9 evolution ,,eta #ab3 ,rattlesnake ,,eta #ac3 ,! ma9 psy*iatric illnesses3 p>anoia & s*izophr5ia ,,eta #ad3 ,suicide ,,eta #ae3 ,normality te/s ,,eta #af3 ,dreams ,,eta #ag3 ,! hi/ory ( ! evolution ( ! human species1 bas$ on ,,mdt ,,eta #ah3 ,! organization ( ! human society ,,eta #ai3 ,! s*izophr5ic-p>anoiac complex 7,,xspc7 ,,eta #bj3 ,induc$ p>anoia 7,,xip7 & p>anoiac-s*izophr5ic complex 7,,xpsc7 ,,eta #ba3 ,di%>monies ( ! functions ( ! bra9 ,,eta #bb3 ,direct demon/ration ( ! function to build image models ,,eta #bc3 ,"s basic p>amet]s ( ! bra9 = measur+ ! p]=mances ,,eta #bd3 ,animals ,,eta #be3 ,v complicat$ op]ations on image models 7walk1 jumps1 climb+ trees7 ( humans ,,eta #bf3 ,! bra9 evolves "u our eyes ,,eta #bg3 ,pr9cipial negative effects associat$ ) ! function+ ( ! bra9 ,,eta #bh3 ,free-masonry ,,eta #bi3 ,problems associat$ ) movie-mak+ ,,eta #cj3 ,optical p]spective & ! quality ( con/ruction ( image models ,,eta #ca3 ,some?+ agressivity may fight ,,xs#a-type s*izophr5ia ,,eta #cb3 ,sex ,,eta #cc3 ,! int]nal body ,,eta #cd3 ,! european _s ,end notes ,bibliography ,introduction ,?is book conta9s my orig9al !ory1 call$ ,,mdt 7,model+ ,devices ,!ory7 on ! basic h>dw>e function ( ! bra9 7human or animal74 ,z any sci5tific !ory1 x is a symbolic model4 ,any symbolic model is bas$ on a limit$ numb] ( basic t]ms & a limit$ numb] ( basic relations betwe5 ! basic t]ms4 ,= ! basic t]ms & only = !m1 !re are accept$ descriptive def9itions4 ,all ! o!rs t]ms are g5]at$ by ! model1 toge!r ) _! normal def9itions4 ,^! def9itions are g5]at$ by ! model by logical & ma!matical proc$ures4 ,^! are ! basic *>act]i/ics ( any sci5tific !ory & s1 ,i foll[ ! proc$ures describ$ above1 to make a !ory on ! basic h>dw>e functions ( ! bra94 ,?is !ory is 9 a total opposition ) all ! actual sci5ces associat$ ) ! functions ( ! bra94 ,! pres5t sci5ces1 associat$ ) ! functions ( ! bra91 are n bas$ on a s+le fundam5tal model4 ,9 ?is way1 z my !ory w be accept$1 all :at x 0 already writt5 9 ! actual sci5ces associat$ ) ! functions ( ! bra91 h to be re-writt5 or =gott54 ,?is attempt ( total revolution is necess>y because ! actual sci5ces on ! bra9 don't use normal def9itions ( ! t]ms2 !re are only descriptions associat$ ) !m4 ,because ! def9itions ( ! t]ms are n g5]at$ by a s+le fundam5tal model1 ! logical corelation betwe5 !m is n possible4 ,s1 ! actual sci5ces associat$ ) ! bra9 _c evolve to become positive sci5ce anymore4 ,9 psy*ology1 = in/ance1 ab\t any sci5ti/ has 8_/h] own li/ ( descriptive def9ition associat$ ) ! t]ms us$ by him_/h]4 ,9 ?is way1 x is n possible to make a logical /ructure to integrate all ! t]ms us$ 9 t field4 ,s1 ! psy*ology1 = in/ance1 is n a positive sci5ce4 ,ano!r example3 ,let's consid] a classical positive sci5ce1 z ,newton's ,me*anics is4 ,9 ?is symbolic model1 all t]ms h exactly ! same def9ition = all ! sci5ti/s4 ,^! def9ition are n *ang$ s9ce #cdj ye>s ago :5 !y 7 g5]at$ by ! symbolic model ( ,me*anics4 ,= in/ance1 ! t]m spe$ is def9$ z vs_/t4 ,t is1 spe$ means t ! space is divid$ by "t4 ,?is def9ition is a normal def9ition g5]at$ by ! symbolic model ( ,me*anics n a descriptive def9ition4 ,let's suppose n[ t a symbolic model associat$ ) ! basic h>dw>e function ( ! bra9 is already creat$ or x w be creat$4 ,! fir/ consequ5ce is t all ! t]ms us$ 9 association ) ! functions ( ! bra9 w be g5]at$ by ! model by logical & ma!matical proc$ures1 toge!r ) _! normal def9itions4 ,!re is no reason to suppose t any descriptive def9ition :i* is already us$ 9 ! pres5t sci5ces ( ! bra9 w be compatible ) ! def9itions g5]at$ by t symbolic model4 ,s1 all :at is already creat$ 9 ! pres5t sci5ces associat$ ) ! bra9 has to be re-writt5 or =gott54 ,reg>dless ( ! fact t ,,mdt !ory w be accept$ or n1 a symbolic model :i* cov]s ! basic h>dw>e function ( ! bra9 w produce ?is total revolution 9 all ! sci5ces associat$ ) ! bra91 includ+ psy*ology1 psy*iatry1 gnoseology1 epi/emology1 _m p>ts ( social sci5ces & s on4 ,let's consid] t a symbolic model to cov] ! basic functions ( ! bra9 is creat$ & is already accept$4 ,! p]sons :o already "w 9 ^! fields h to re-/>t ev]y?+ ab\t f z]o4 ,_! opposition w be enorm\s & ,i h no illusion 9 ?is direction4 ,?is !ory 0 creat$ ab\t #aj ye>s ago4 ,bas$ on my p]sonal exp]i5ce1 ! !ory is easily und]/ood by p]sons ) special ori5tation on positive sci5ces1 includ+ *ildr5's ov] #ab ye>s old4 ,also1 ! p]sons :o already "w ) symbolic models 7ma!maticians1 physici/s1 eng9e]s & s on7 h a high capacity to und]/& x4 ,let's see :at ,,mdt (f]s4 ,fir/ ( all1 ,,mdt treats ! bra9 z a device :i* processes ! in=mation4 ,9 ?is way1 ,,mdt has no direct connection ) ! m$ic9e4 ,,mdt is conc]n+ only ) ! basic functions associat$ ) in=mation process+ & x is n int]e/$ by problems z :at "p ( ! bra9 is do+ some?+ or h[ a function is implem5t$4 ,,mdt is a !ory associat$ ) ! process+ ( ! in=mation & s x has no direct int]f]5ce ) ! h>dw>e implem5tation ( ! physical bra94 ,z a symbolic model associat$ ) ! basic function ( ! bra91 x g5]ates precise def9ition1 bas$ on logic1 ( all ! t]ms us$ 9 association ) ! basic h>dw>e functions ( ! bra94 ,9 ?is way1 all ! t]ms are logical correlat$ betwe5 !m4 ,examples3 ,,mdt g5]ates normal def9itions =3 k1 consci\sness1 to imag9e1 to ?9k1 intellig5ce1 emotion1 to be irritate1 love1 happ9ess & _m o!rs4 ,e4g4 ! consci\sness is ! facility ( a bra9 to make & op]ate a model :i* conta9s ! be+ itself z an elem5t4 ,,mdt def9es1 ?an1 #f diff]5t types ( consci\sness :i* are1 ( c\rse1 def9$ 9 ! same precise way4 ,ev5 m1 bas$ on ,,mdt1 x is possible to design a logical /ructure to implem5t ! function call$ consci\sness4 ,,mdt expla9s ! basic functions ( ! bra9 up to ! level to make a logical design to syn!size all ! bra9's functions 7human or animal74 ,( c\rse1 a te*nological implem5tation ( t functions is n possible n[ because ! comput]s1 = example1 h yet a v l[ p[] to process ! in=mation & ?is situation w la/1 ,i ?9k1 at lea/ 9 ! next #be ye>s4 ,9 fact1 ! bra9 is treat$ by ,,mdt z a te*nological product4 ,s1 !re are def9$ ! ma9 design goals & also1 ! ma9 defici5cies 7by design or giv5 by te*nological implem5tation74 ,!re is analyz$ ! problem if1 by evolution1 x is possible or n to evolve f animal bra9 to human bra94 ,!re are analyz$ ! design & te*nological problems1 includ+ ! functional illnesses ( ! bra9s4 ,! !ory treats also ! p>anormal ph5om5on & sugge/ "s me?ods to develop su* activities4 ,! ,application section 7,e,t,as7 conta9s also _m items z a hi/ory ( ! evolution ( ! bra91 ! evaluation ( ! problems ( psy*ological te/s & p]=mance te/s = a bra91 "s problems associat$ ) ! pres5t & future levels ( evolution ( ! bra91 "s long range problems associat$ ) ! developm5t ( ! human society 7includ+ ! t]rorism7 & _m o!rs4 ,! basic elem5ts ( ,,mdt occurs 9 #aiic & ! fir/ writt5 =m 7on ,,web7 9 #aiig4 ,9 #bjjc a pr9t$ edition ( ! !ory 0 publi%$ 79 ,romanian language7 by ! ,romanian ,publi%+ ,h\se ,editura ,alba/ra & 9 #bjjd1 9 ! frame ( ,gut5b]g ,project1 a new edition also 9 ,romanian4 ,! process ( develop+ is cont9u+4 ,dor9 ,t4 ,,moisa moisazappmobile4ro ,,! ,,basic ,,functions ,,( ,,! ,,bra9 ,,ab/ract ,?is !ory1 call$ by me z ,,mdt 7,model+ ,devices ,!ory7 consid]s t ! basic h>dw>e function ( any bra9 7human or animal7 is to make & op]ate image models 7or analogic models7 :i* are associat$ ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,9 ?is frame1 = ! human bra9 only1 !re is an additional h>dw>e facility3 to make & op]ate symbolic models4 ,,fundam5tal ,,t]ms 7,,keywords7 ,image model 7or analogic model71 symbolic model1 simulation on model1 in=mation1 tru?1 reality1 input reality 7,,ir71 ext]nal reality1 image1 h>mony1 logic1 g5]al communications language 7,,gcl71 logical & ma!matical language4 ,,def9itions ,,associat$ ,,) ,,! ,,basic ,,t]ms ,?is !ory is a symbolic model4 ,any symbolic model has a limit$ numb] ( fundam5tal t]ms4 ,= ^! t]ms & only = !m1 !re are accept$ descriptive def9itions4 ,a descriptive def9ition is1 usually1 n precise en\gh = a sci5tific approa*4 ,?is lack ( precision is due to ! fact t x uses t]ms :i* mu/ be def9$ be=e4 ,! t]ms us$ 9 ! def9ition mu/ also be def9$ us+ already def9$ words4 ,?is process seems to be endless4 ,9 any positive sci5ce1 ! descriptive def9itions are accept$ only = a v limit$ numb] ( t]ms4 ,^! are call$ fundam5tal t]ms4 ,= in/ance1 9 ! symbolic model ( ,newton's ,me*anics1 ! fundam5tal t]ms are mass1 space & "t4 ,none ( ^! t]ms h a normal def9ition 7i4e4 g5]at$ by ! model74 ,!y h only descriptive def9itions4 ,once ! fundam5tal t]ms are introduc$ by description1 all ! o!r t]ms h normal def9itions1 :i* are g5]at$ by ! symbolic model1 by logical & ma!matical op]ations4 ,let's see ! def9itions ( ! t]ms us$ by ! ,,mdt !ory4 ,model3 ?is is a t]m us$ on l>ge scale 9 sci5ce & te*nology4 ,! ,,mdt !ory accepts ! def9ition us$ !re4 ,a model means "s fundam5tal elem5ts & "s fundam5tal relations betwe5 ! elem5ts4 ,! elem5ts c\ld be ( any type 7physical objects1 ! repres5tation ( any object 9 any =m1 includ+ pictures ( any type or images ( any type or ma!matical symbols ( any type & s on74 ,9 fact1 an elem5t c\ld be associat$ ) any?+ :i* c be consid]$ z an entity4 ,! elem5ts h "s prop]ties1 :i* mu/ be specifi$ someh[4 ,!re are a numb] ( relations betwe5 ! elem5ts1 :i* mu/ also be specifi$4 ,an image model 7or analogic model7 conta9s an unspecifi$ numb] ( elem5ts & an unspecifi$ numb] ( relations betwe5 ! elem5ts4 ,an image model is j giv5 z x is4 ,x is n possible to specify 9 explicit & precise ways :i* are ! elem5ts & :i* are ! relations4 ,examples ( image models3 maps1 models ( an object ( any type1 an assembly ( su* models includ+ any mat]ial elem5ts 7wat]1 air & s on71 any repres5tation 9 any =m ( su* elem5ts4 ,a symbolic model uses z elem5ts lett]s1 numb]s or words4 ,! relations are ( logical or ma!matical type4 ,! mo/ important symbolic model is ! ,g5]al ,communications ,language 7,,gcl74 ,! elem5ts are usually n\ns & ! relations are usually v]bs4 ,w>n+3 ,,gcl is n really a symbolic model4 ,! ,,gcl j conta9s all ! elem5ts & all ! relations4 ,:5 a symbolic model is made 7a s5t5ce1 = in/ance71 elem5ts & relations f ,,gcl are us$4 ,?us1 because !re is no available ^w1 ,i decid$ to consid]1 by ext5sion1 ! ,,gcl z a symbolic model4 ,9 ?is frame1 ,,gcl has to be consid]$ z symbolic model4 ,once a model giv51 x is possible to simulate "s situations on x4 ,= simulation1 a *ange mu/ be made to ! model4 ,aft] t1 ! entire model w be *ang$ because all ! elem5ts h "s relations betwe5 !m4 ,any implicit or explicit in=mation :i* is g5]at$ by simulation by a model1 is call$ tru?4 ,any tru? mu/ be associat$ ) ! model1 :i* g5]at$ x4 ,?is is ! def9ition ( ! t]m tru? 9 ! ,,mdt !ory4 ,all ! in=mation1 :i* is or c\ld be g5]at$ by a model by simulation1 is call$ reality associat$ to t model4 ,?is is ! def9ition ( ! t]m reality 9 ! ,,mdt !ory4 ,we also see "h t be=e decl>+ ! reality1 "o ne$s to decl>e ! model :i* g5]at$ x4 ,we already us$ ! t]m in=mation4 ,?is t]m is a fundam5tal t]m4 ,x has no normal def9ition4 ,,mdt accepts ! descriptive def9ition f common life & f sci5ce4 ,! same situation is = ! t]m entity4 ,w>n+3 9 connection ) ! t]m in=mation1 some?+ is consid]$ z in=mation aft] t some?+ is process$ someh[ by a device :i* takes & processes t some?+4 ,?is someh[ confuse situation is normal = any fundam5tal t]m4 ,j ?9k1 = in/ance1 h[ "o c expla9 :at is "t4 ,! only possibility to expla9 :at is "t is to use examples t already use ! t]m "t4 ,9 fact x is impossible to def9e t]ms z mass1 "t1 space1 in=mation or entity4 ,let's introduce two new t]ms3 h>mony & logic4 ,once a model is giv51 x is possible to make simulations on ! model1 z x has already be5 expla9$4 ,by simulation1 x is necess>y to *ange an elem5t or a relation4 ,! model goes into a tempor>y un/able situation because all ! elem5ts are connect$ betwe5 !m4 ,! model w evolve to a new /able situation4 ,= an image model1 ! evolution to /ability is bas$ on h>mony laws4 ,= a symbolic model1 ! evolution to /ability is bas$ on logic4 ,?us1 a /able model is a h>monic or logic model &1 aft] a p]turbation1 ! model w rega9 ! /ability bas$ on ! laws ( h>mony 7image models7 or logic 7symbolic models74 ,! evolution ( any model t[>d /ability 7to become h>monic or logic7 is also a basic h>dw>e facility ( ! bra94 ,because "s situations f ext]nal reality c be associat$1 sometimes1 ) bo? types ( models1 !re c be a corespond5ce betwe5 h>mony & logic4 ,?us1 ! implicit def9itions ( ! t]ms h>mony & logic are associat$ ) ! me?ods to rega9 ! /ability ( an image model 7h>mony7 or symbolic model 7logic74 ,an implicit def9ition means t we are able to recognize ! effect ( h>mony or logic 9 an in=mational /ructure4 ,we are n[ 9 ! situation to pres5t ! basic h>dw>e function ( any bra91 bas$ on ! t]ms1 :i* h already be5 def9$4 ,! basic h>dw>e function ( any bra9 7human or animal7 is to make models associat$ to ext]nal reality & to pr$ict1 by simulation1 ! possible evolutions ( ! model4 ,because ! model is associat$ ) ext]nal reality1 x is possible to pr$ict by simulation "s probable evolutions ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,we already us$ ! t]m ext]nal reality :i* is n def9$ yet4 ,?is fundam5tal t]m is consid]$ z a s\rce ( in=mation1 :i* is n localiz$ 9 ! /ructure ( models ( ! bra94 ,i want to emphasize t ! ext]nal reality is n a s\rce ( in=mation1 b is j consid]$ s by any bra94 ,?us1 "o ( ! ma9 h>dw>e functions ( ! bra9 is to make models ( ! ext]nal reality & to pr$ict1 by simulation on ! model1 ! possible evolution ( ! associat$ ext]nal reality4 ,we already def9$ ! reality z all ! in=mation :i* is or c\ld be g5]at$ by a model4 ,?is means t we und]/& ! ext]nal reality by ! reality1 :i* is g5]at$ by a model1 :i* is associat$ ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,example3 ,= a giv5 ext]nal reality1 any p]son makes an associat$ model4 ,any p]son has 8_/h] own model associat$ to ! same ext]nal reality4 ,we ?9k & act bas$ on our own reality & n bas$ directly on ! ext]nal reality4 ,9 fact1 ext]nal reality is r an inv5tion ( ! bra9 to expla9 its /ructure ( models4 ,,! ,,basic ,,h>dw>e ,,elem5t ,let's see :at is ! basic h>dw>e elem5t ( a bra9 7human or animal74 ,!re are "s image-type models call$ ,m-models1 :i* are associat$ ) ! s5se organs 7eyes1 e>s & s on74 ,m-models "w 9 association ) "s ,,ym-models1 :i* already exi/ 9 ! bra94 ,,ym-models are concept models4 ,a concept-model is a simplifi$ model :i*1 9 ?is way1 fits a l>ge class ( simil> models4 ,example ( ,,ym models3 dog1 table & s on4 ,m-models h to discov] z _m z possible entities 9 ! ext]nal reality & to associate a ,,ym model to any entity4 ,once an entity 0 fir/ly associat$ ) a ,,ym1 ,m-models w pr$ict its evolution bas$ also on t ,,ym4 ,example3 if an entity 0 associat$ ) a ,,ym-dog1 ! ,m-model is able to pr$ict h[ ?is ,,ym p]=ms 9 connection ) all ! o!r ,y,ms ( x4 ,any pr$iction ( ,m ) t ,,ym includ$ is comp>$ ) ! in=mation obta9$ by ,m f ext]nal reality4 ,! in=mation obta9$ by a ,m-model f outside dur+ ! comp>ison process1 is call$ input reality 7,,ir74 ,we j introduc$ a new t]m z input reality or ,,ir4 ,,ir is ! in=mation obta9$ by an ,m-model f outside 7f ext]nal reality or f o!r models7 to improve its pr$ictions4 ,if ! pr$iction meets ,,ir1 !n ,m w try ano!r pr$iction to improve its quality4 ,if "o or m pr$ictions d n meet ,,ir1 !n ,m w replace t ,,yr ) ano!r1 & ! process w cont9ue4 ,?is process w cont9ue s t all ! entities :i* are discov]$ by ,m-models w be associat$ ) "s ,y,ms & all ! pr$ictions ( ,m mu/ confirm ! ,m-model1 un*ang$4 ,su* a model is1 ?us1 a /able model4 ,:5 ,m is /able1 all ,y,ms are integrat$ 9 ,m 9 a h>monic way4 ,! ma9 function ( ,m-models is to make a prelim9>y h>monic model 7/able model7 associat$ ) an ext]nal reality4 ,conclusion3 a ,m-model int]acts ) a section ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,m w be a model made 9 an in=mational way by analogy ) t section ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,because ,m is a model1 all ! elem5ts are connect$ betwe5 !m 9 a h>monic way1 s t ! model is /able4 ,?is /ability is v]ifi$ on & on 9 an automatic way1 z long z a specific ext]nal reality is 9 int]action ) ! specific ,m-model4 ,m-models int]act ) "s o!r type models1 call$ ,,zm-models4 ,,zm-models take "s in=mation f "o or m ,m-models & cont9ue ! con/ruction ( models associat$ ) ! correspond+ ext]nal reality4 ,to d ?is1 ,,zm- models int]act ) ! o!r ,,zm-models ( ! bra9 to improve ,m-models4 ,m-models are j prelim9>y models bas$ on ,,ym-models4 ,a ,,zm model w take any in=mation f any o!r ,m & ,,zm models ( ! bra91 to improve x4 ,example3 an ,m-model is associat$ ) a bus t transports p4 ,a ,,zm- model takes ?is in=mation & tries to see if ?is bus transports t\ri/s or is a public transport vehicle4 ,to d ?is1 x w use in=mation tak5 f any o!r ,,zm-models & ,m-models4 ,! aim is to make a ,,zm-model1 :i* reflects z well z possible a section ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,because ,,zm is a model1 x is /able & because ?is model is integrat$ 9 a /ructure ( o!r ,,zm-models1 ! /ructure ( ,,zm-models is /able too4 ,?is problem w be treat$ lat] 9 details4 ,,zm-models are long-range models4 ,?is t]m w be expla9$ lat]4 ,"h1 ! long-range model is und]/ood z a model1 :i* already develop$ its elem5ts z self /&+ models4 ,,zm models are ! ma9 models1 :i* reflect ! ext]nal reality4 ,we def9e n[ two v important t]ms3 k & consci\sness4 ,k is associat$ ) ! facility to pr$ict ! evolution ( ! ext]nal reality bas$ on a /ructure ( h>monic_/logic models4 ,?is /ructure 0 made by a l>ge numb] ( int]actions ) _m sections ( ! ext]nal reality & s x already g5]at$ a l>ge numb] ( good pr$ictions4 ,?is means t ! only gu>antee ( ! correctness ( ! k is ! confid5ce 9 t /ructure ( models4 ,?is issue w be develop$ 9 details lat] 9 ! book4 ,! consci\sness is ! facility to make & op]ate a model1 associat$ ) ! ext]nal reality1 :]e ! p]son itself is an elem5t ( t model4 ,:5 su* a model is activat$1 x w also f9d ! position ( ! p]son 9 ! model & s x w pr$ict ! position ( ! p]son 9 ! ext]nal reality4 ,?is issue w also be develop$ 9 detail 9 ano!r "p ( ! book4 ,we w n[ develop "s issues associat$ ) ! t]m k4 ,we already def9$ k z ! capacity to pr$ict 9 a correct way ! evolution ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,"h we use ! t]m correct4 ,let's see :at x means4 ,?is t]m has two def9itions4 ,"o situation is :5 a model makes a pr$iction & ! pr$iction is comp>$ ) ,,ir4 ,if ! pr$iction meets ,,ir1 !n ! pr$iction is correct4 ,un=tunately1 !re are v few situations :5 ! comp>ison betwe5 pr$iction & ,,ir is possible4 ,= in/ance1 build+ a bridge4 ,a problem is1 = in/ance1 if ! bridge w be /able or n 9 case ( an e>?quake4 ,"h we ne$ a gu>antee t ! bridge is prop]ly built & !re is no possibility to v]ify ?is bas$ on ,,ir4 ,! second def9ition ( ! t]m correct is3 ! bra9 w consid] z correct any pr$iction bas$ on a h>monic_/logic /ructure ( models4 ,to be h>monic1 ! /ructure 0 already v]ifi$1 bas$ on ,,ir 9 _m o!r situations4 ,s1 ! only gu>antee ( a correct pr$iction is ! confid5ce 9 t /ructure ( models4 ,,mdt is associat$ ) ! basic h>dw>e functions ( ! bra94 ,once we describ$ ! h>dw>e /ructure1 ev]y?+ :at ! ,,mdt pr$icts is bas$ on :at ! h>dw>e is able to d4 ,:at ,,mdt says ab\t k is n ano!r !ory on k b :at ! h>dw>e is able to d4 ,any exp]im5t is bas$ on a model4 ,t model tells u :at we are do+ & ! same model tells u :at we get & :at we see4 ,any model t makes ! exp]im5t j improves itself4 ,an improv$ model w make bett] pr$ictions & t is all4 ,!re is no gu>antee associat$ ) ! k except ! confid5ce 9 our own /ructure ( models4 ,let's see ano!r aspect4 ,we saw t any exp]im5t is bas$ on a model4 ,! model tells u :at we did & :at we get & see4 ,if !re are _m p]sons :o p>ticipate 9 an exp]im5t1 ev]yone w make 8_/h] own model bas$ on 8_/h] own /ructure ( models4 ,:at ev]yone gets & sees dep5ds on "o's own /ructure ( models4 ,example3 up to ar\nd ye> #aejj ev]ybody knew t ! ,e>? 0 ! c5t] ( ! ,univ]se4 ,?is idea 0 support$ by direct obs]vation ( ! sky b also by a p[]ful /ructure ( models4 ,s1 9 t p]iod1 ! a/ronom]s 7 able to calculate ,sun & ,moon eclipses1 und]/& & calculate _m p>amet]s associat$ ) ! movem5t ( ! ,moon1 ,sun & />s4 ,ev5 ! ,holy ,book support$ ?is idea1 at lea/ 9 an implicit way4 ,9 t p]iod1 ! idea t ,e>? is ! c5t] ( ! ,univ]se 0 correct4 ,i want to emphasize aga9 t ! situation is g5]at$ by ! "w pr9ciple ( ! bra94 ,x does n matt] if we l or n ?is situation6 ,! situation w be ! same =ev]4 ,= in/ance1 ,newton's ,me*anics consid]s t !re is a fundam5tal field ( =ces call$ gravity4 ,ev]ybody consid]s t ! gravity exi/s4 ,b ,e9/e9 says t !re is no su* a field ( =ces2 :at we see is j an effect ( ! di/ortion ( ! space due to mass4 ,if ,e9/e9 is "r1 ! idea t !re is gravity is n correct anymore4 ,see also ! applications4 ,s1 9 e mom5t1 ! bra9 w consid] z correct ev]y?+ :i* is g5]at$ by its /ructure ( /able models4 ,"s sci5ti/s c\ld consid] ^! ass]tions z unacceptable1 b reg>dless ( ! fact t we l or n su* a situation1 ! bra9 is able to d only :at ! h>dw>e /ructure is able to d4 ,!re is ano!r t]m t has "s associat$ problems4 ,?is t]m is wrong4 ,if a model makes wrong pr$ictions1 ?is usually does n mean t ! model is wrong4 ,x means j t ! model is n suitable to ! giv5 ext]nal reality4 ,fac$ ) a new ext]nal reality1 ! bra9 w activate ! model :i* makes ! be/ pr$ictions associat$ ) t ext]nal reality4 ,if a model makes wrong pr$ictions1 we h to *ange ! model ) ano!r "o or to modify ! model4 ,example3 ,newton's symbolic model ( ,me*anics makes wrong pr$ictions associat$ ) ! objects mov+ at a spe$ comp>able to ! spe$ ( light1 b its pr$ictions are good 7correct7 at l[] spe$4 ,9 any situation1 ! t]ms correct & wrong mu/ be associat$ ) a model or ) a /ructure ( models4 ,we already describ$ ! fir/ basic h>dw>e facility associat$ ) ! bra9 7human or animal74 ,x g5]ates tru?1 reality1 k & consci\sness4 ,n[ we w describe ! second basic h>dw>e facility ( ! bra94 ,?is is ! action on ! ext]nal reality4 ,we already saw t fac$ ) a section ( ! ext]nal reality1 ! bra9 makes at lea/ "o ,,zm model4 ,a ,,zm model works 9 association ) any available 7or sev]al7 ,m-model & ) any o!r ,z,ms ( t bra94 ,! ma9 ,,zm is able to pr$ict 9 a correct way ! evolution ( a section ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,su* a ,,zm is able to make a new class ( long-range models call$ ,z,a,ms4 ,z,a,ms are artificial & inv>iant4 ,an artificial model is made )\t any direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,an inv>iant model is a model1 :i* _c be *ang$ by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,a ,,zm model w make a ,,zam model 9 ord] to modify ! ext]nal reality4 ,once a ,,zam is made1 x becomes a ref]5ce model 9 *ang+ ! ext]nal reality4 ,to d ?is1 ! ,,zam-model works 9 connection ) a numb] ( ,,azm models4 ,an ,,azm is a model :i* is already connect$ to ! execution organs ( a be+ 7= human be+s ^! are legs1 h&s & s on74 ,once a ,,zam is activat$1 x w simulate ! reque/$ action us+ any in=mation f all models ( ! bra94 ,bas$ on simulations1 ,,zam w det]m9e if x is able or n to meet ! goal4 ,if ! simulation %[s t ! action is possible1 !n ! ,,zam w activate ,,azm models = action on ! ext]nal reality4 ,! ,,zam w control ! ,a,z,ms to act on ! ext]nal reality exactly z 9 ! successful simulation1 ) good *ances ( success4 ,if by any simulation ! objective is impossible to rea*1 ! bra9 w be block$ to d t activity4 ,example3 if a p]son has to jump ov] an ob/acle1 t p]son w "k v fa/ if ! jump is possible or n4 ,! p]son kn[s ?is1 because a ,,zm makes a ,,zam-model1 :i* is associat$ to ! ext]nal reality 7! p]son itself1 ! support+ surface & ! ob/acle1 z ma9 elem5ts74 ,! ,,zam !n simulates ! jump on ! model4 ,if ! simulat$ jump fails1 ! bra9 is block$ to d ! action4 ,if ! jump is done ) success 9 ! simulation1 ! ,,zam w control ! body dur+ ! jump exactly z x 0 9 ! simulation1 ) good *ance ( success4 ,no action on ! ext]nal reality is possible )\t a successful simulation ( t action4 ,! action w be z 9 ! successful simulation4 ,bo? 9 an imm$iate action & 9 an activity t has to be done 9 ! future1 any bra9 foll[s ?is proc$ure4 ,we %all add "s consid]ations ab\t ! spe$ ( action on ext]nal reality4 ,s1 :5 we walk on a plane surface1 = ea* /ep !re is at lea/ "o simulation be=e ! /ep is done4 ,due to a l>ge numb] ( int]nal & ext]nal factors1 any /ep is unique4 ,?us1 if we walk on a raw surface 7a /ony trail 9 ! m\nta9s1 = in/ance7 n only e /ep 9 bas$ on a simulation b ev5 dur+ ! execution ( a /ep1 x is possible to make a new simulation bas$ on new data & s a /ep 9 execution c be modifi$ at all "t to meet ! goal z ,,zam requires4 ,?us1 a v complicat$ activity z walk+ on a m\nta9 trail1 c be done v easily & ev5 elegantly1 bas$ on cont9u\s pr$ictions & simulations associat$ ) e /ep4 ,z x 0 already emphasiz$ be=e1 ?is proc$ure to simulate 9 advance any activity on ext]nal reality is foll[$ 9 all situations1 reg>dless if ! activity is imm$iate or x has to be done 9 ! future4 ,we h already describ$ ! two ma9 h>dw>e facilities ( ! bra9 7human or animal74 ,"h is a prelim9>y ab/ract ( ! ma9 h>dw>e models ( ! bra93 ,m-models3 ^! models are associat$ to s5se organs4 ,! bra9 tries to make a prelim9>y model ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,to d ?is1 x uses a numb] ( ,,ym concept models4 ,! ma9 activity is to f9d ! entities ( ! ext]nal reality & to associate to any entity a ,,ym model4 ,!n1 by simulation on ! model1 ,m-models try to integrate any ,,ym model 9 ! /ructure 9 a h>monic way4 ,t is1 any simulation ( int]action betwe5 a ,,ym & any o!r ,,ym- model mu/ confirm ! ,m-model1 unalt]$4 ,if1 = in/ance1 "s pr$ictions ( an ,,ym#a model 9 relation ) an ,,ym#b model are n compatible ) ! pr$iction ( ! ,,ym#b model 9 relation ) ! ,,ym#a model1 !n ,m has to *ange ,,ym#a or ,,ym#b1 or "s relations1 or "s o!r ,y,ms1 s t ! ,m-model is /able4 ,m-models "w 9 an automatic way1 try+ to be /able 9 int]action ) ! associat$ section ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,,ym-models3 !y are concept models associat$ ) all ! entities1 :i* h already be5 discov]$ by ! bra9 by ,m-model activity4 ,:5 a new be+ is born1 !re are practically no ,y,ms4 ,!y are made by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,,zm-models3 !y are ! ma9 long-range models ( ! bra94 ,!y g5]ate k & consci\sness4 ,also !y make ,y,ms1 ,z,a,ms & ,a,z,ms4 ,!y are able to take any in=mation f any o!r model ( ! bra94 ,z,ms c replace a ,,ym-model ) ano!r if some?+ is n ,,ok aft] an advance pr$iction & simulation bas$ on any available data4 ,!y also control ,,zam-models dur+ _! activity4 ,,zam-models3 !y are artificial & inv>iant models4 ,an artificial model is n g5]at$ by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,an inv>iant model is a model1 :i* _c be *ang$ by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,z,a,ms are models1 :i* act on ! ext]nal reality4 ,once a ,,zam 0 made & activat$ by a ,,zm1 x w simulate ! activity1 us+ any in=mation f any model ( ! bra94 ,by "o or m simulations1 ! ,,zam w f9d ! "r solution4 ,if x fails to f9d a solution1 !n ! ,,zm w make ano!r ,,zam & ! process cont9ues4 ,,azm-models3 !y are associat$ 9 a direct way to ! organs :i* c act on ext]nal reality4 ,!y are ready-made :5 a be+ is born1 b1 to be us$1 !y h to be dynamically calibrat$ by ! activity ( ! ,z,a,ms4 ,t is1 a ,,zam has to "k ev]y?+ is association ) ! ext]nal organs ( a body 7e4g4 h&s1 legs = a human74 ,:5 a ,,zam has to make a simulation1 x has to "k all ! p>amet]s ( ! muscles1 = in/ance4 ,an ,,azm has to "k & transmit su* p>amet]s4 ,to d ?is1 ,a,z,ms keep a model ( any ext]nal organ ( t be+4 ,all ^! models are associat$ ) ! h>dw>e implem5tation ( ! bra94 ,we w see lat] "s o!rs types ( models :i* are associat$ ) ! s(tw>e implem5tation ( ! bra94 ,,"s ,,pr9cipial ,,problems ,:5 an ,m-model is activat$ x does n "k h[ _m entities are 9 ! ext]nal reality4 ,ev5 m1 x does n "k :i* are ^! entities4 ,! device w try to f9d !m bas$ on ! facilities ( ! s5se organs1 b !re is no gu>antee t ,m-models h f\nd all ! entities & no gu>antee t ! "r ,y,ms are associat$ to su* entities4 ,?is is a basic defici5cy4 ,! cam\flage & dissimulation are me?ods :i* use ?is defici5cy4 ,by cam\flage an entity is n discov]$ & by dissimulation ,m-models associate a wrong ,,ym to an entity4 ,let's see ano!r basic problem4 ,any model evolves to be h>monic ) itself & s1 to be /able4 ,?is means t1 aft] any *ange 9 ! model1 x has to rega9 its /ability4 ,if a model has a di%>mony1 x has to correct itself bas$ on ,,ir or bas$ on an int]nal *ange 7,,ir is n available 9 any situation74 ,?us ! model rega9s its /ability1 b 9 "s cases ! model c\ld be n suitable anymore to reflect ! ext]nal reality4 ,!re are _m cases :5 a model is /able b its pr$ictions associat$ ) ! ext]nal reality are wrong4 ,we already def9$ reality z all ! in=mation t is or c\ld be g5]at$ by a model by simulation4 ,! gu>antee ( a correct reality is ! /ability ( ! model b ! /ability ( ! model is n a gu>antee t ! model is capable to accurately reflect ! associat$ ext]nal reality4 ,t is1 !re is no gu>antee t all ! entities ( a giv5 ext]nal reality are discov]$1 !re is no gu>antee t ! "r ,y,ms are associat$ ) ^! entities & s on4 ,! /ability ( a model is j a gu>antee t all ! available in=mation is correlat$ 9 ! "r way4 ,!re is ano!r class ( basic problems associat$ ) ! *anges 9 a model4 ,if a model has to be *ang$1 sometimes !re are small *ances to d t4 ,9 fact1 ! only possibility is to make a new model f scrat*1 us+ or n elem5ts & relations f ! old model4 ,?is activity c\ld be sometimes s complex t x c exce$ ! te*nical capacity ( ! bra94 ,inde$1 a new model mu/ be accept$ by ! :ole /ructure ( models4 ,t is1 any o!r model ( ! /ructure mu/ accept any pr$iction ( ! new model1 s t ! new /ructure is /able4 ,if ! new model is good 9 int]action ) ! ext]nal reality b ! /ructure ( ! models is n good en\gh1 !n "s o!r models ( ! /ructure h to be *ang$ too4 ,z ,i said1 ?is process c exce$ ! bra9's te*nical capacity ( process+4 ,?is c be consid]$ z a design defici5cy too4 ,?is expla9s a lot ( situations 9 common life1 :5 logical argum5ts or facts tak5 f ext]nal reality _c *ange wrong models "s p h4 ,z we "k1 a /able model is a model :i* correlates 9 a "r way all ! available in=mation4 ,b1 !re is no gu>antee t we ga9 en\gh in=mation to make ! "r model4 ,?is basic defici5cy is att5uat$ by ! fact t !re is a /ructure ( models4 ,! /ructure ( models helps a lot :5 we int]act ) a new ext]nal reality because x c make pr$ictions bas$ on ! previ\s int]action ) o!r ext]nal realities4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ! /ructure ( models is l a brake = evolution if ! /ructure has problems4 ,example3 ,! a/ronom] ,cop]nicus made a model ( ! ,univ]se bas$ on ! idea t ! ,sun is ! c5t] ( ! ,univ]se1 n ,e>?1 z ev]ybody knew at ! "t4 ,ar\nd ! ye> #aedc1 v few p]sons 7 able to *ange ! :ole /ructure ( models1 bas$ on ?is new model4 ,we cont9ue ) o!r basic problems & features4 ,9 ! normal activity ( ! bra91 any ,,zm-model has full access to any model ( ! bra94 ,t is1 a ,,zm model c correlate in=mation f _m ,m-type models & f any o!r ,,zm ( ! bra94 ,?is is true = any ,,zm ( ! bra94 ,9 ! complex int]action betwe5 a bra9 & ! ext]nal reality1 !re is a s+le ,,zm at a "t1 controll+ t be+4 ,?is ,,zm is call$ a local-,,zm or an active-,,zm4 ,a ,,zm c be *ang$ to ano!r 9 a dynamical way1 s t ! be+ does _m activities 9 "t-%>+4 ,?is activity is n simple4 ,s1 :5 a local-,,zm is deactivat$1 x has to /ore ! conditions1 to be able to resume :5 x takes control aga94 ,!re are problems associat$ ) ?is activity4 ,"s ( ! in=mation c be lo/ or ! ext]nal reality may evolve 9 ! mean "t s t ! /or$ in=mation w be ( no use4 ,9 ?is way1 any model1 :i* takes control ( ! be+1 has to initialize be=e be+ able to rega9 full control4 ,?is activity ( initialization is v complex & 9 "s situations x might conta9 errors4 ,?us1 x is r difficult to d _m activities 9 "t- %>+4 ,!re is also a basic problem associat$ ) ! t]m k4 ,z we "k1 ! k is associat$ ) ! pr$ictions ( a /ructure ( models4 ,s1 ! k is associat$ ) ! /ructure ( models & n ) ! ext]nal reality1 z we'd l x to be4 ,we %\ld nev] ev] =get ?is ?+4 ,ev5 m1 k is a non-s5se if we d n decl>e ! /ructure ( models4 ,example3 9 any positive sci5ce1 x is usual to say t some?+ is true bas$ on a specifi$ !ory 7model74 ,,h[ ,m-,,zm ,,models ,,are ,,made ,= a giv5 ext]nal reality1 ! bra9 makes a /ructure ( models1 us+ in=mation tak5 f ! ext]nal reality or f o!r models4 ,we w see h[ ?is function works 9 a specifi$ situation3 h[ a new ,m-,,zm is made 9 int]action ) a new ext]nal reality4 ,?is function is describ$ = a normal & mature bra94 ,! t]m normal bra9 w be treat$ lat]4 ,"h1 a normal bra9 is a bra91 :i* is able to "w z x 0 already describ$ 9 ! section ( h>dw>e facilities4 ,a mature bra9 is a bra91 :i* has en\gh ,,ym & ,,zm models made dur+ a long "t ( int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,an image is an in=mation :i* is receiv$ z x is1 9 ! same way z x w\ld be g5]at$ by a ,,tv-cam]a = in/ance4 ,?is k9d ( in=mation1 )\t any mean+ 9 fact1 has to be integrat$ by ! bra9 z an image- model4 ,z we already "k1 ,m-models h to f9d "s entities 9 t image4 ,!y />t by mak+ a #c;,d-image4 ,?is is possible 9 a r easy way because almo/ all be+s h two eyes4 ,s !re are two plane images & ,m-models w make a #c;,d-image4 ,n[1 ! basic problem is t f a #c;,d-image x is n an easy task to id5tify ! entities4 ,m-models w use any supplem5t>y in=mation associat$ ) ?is #c;,d-model1 z color1 contra/1 brightness1 ! movem5t ( "s entities & s on4 ,anyways1 ,m-models h to associate entities to ,,ym-models4 ,?is process c\ld be affect$ by mi/akes1 b1 because ,m is a model1 !re w be a lot ( cross*ecks t w all[ to discov] & correct "s ( ! mi/akes4 ,= in/ance1 if some?+ r\nd is discov]$1 x c\ld be an apple 7,,ym- apple7 or a ball 7,,ym-ball7 or any?+ else4 ,once a possible entity is associat$ ) a ,,ym1 ! ,m-model w pr$ict h[ ?is ,,ym int]acts ) ! o!r ,y,ms ( ! model4 ,= in/ance1 !re is a ,,ym-apple4 ,x has a relation 7x is v close to7 ) a ,,ym-table4 ,s1 f ! pr$ict$ prop]ties ( ! table1 bas$ on simulation1 x results t x c support an apple1 & f ! pr$ict$ prop]ties ( ! apple1 x results t x c /ay on t table4 ,s1 ?is relation seems to be good & ?us1 maybe ! ,y,ms are ,,ok4 ,n[ ano!r example3 an apple is on a ?9 bran* ( a tree4 ,f ! pr$ict$ prop]ties ( ! bran*1 x results t x _c support t apple4 ,s1 ! *oos5 ,,ym-apple or ,,ym-bran* is n good4 ,m-models h to *ange some?+ or to add some?+ 7maybe !re is no gravity !re4447 to be /able4 ,! exact proc$ures & me?ods c be diff]5t4 ,anyway1 ,,mdt is a basic !ory & x is n conc]n$ ) ! te*nological implem5tation ( ! functions ( ! bra94 ,x is en\gh to say t !re are basic me?ods to solve ! problems & also t ! me?ods are n #ajj safe1 z ev]ybody kn[s f 8_/h] direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,:at is obta9$ by ?is int]action is a prelim9>y ,m-model associat$ ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,?is ,m-model is 9 int]action )1 at lea/1 "o ,,zm- model1 :i* develops ! ,m-model bas$ on any o!r in=mation available 9 ! bra94 ,^! two processes happ5 almo/ simultane\sly4 ,z an ,m-model is made1 a ,,zm- model takes "s in=mation f ! ,m-model & improves itself4 ,also1 ,,zm c *ange or add "s in=mation into ! ,m-model1 bas$ on in=mation obta9$ f o!r ,m-models or ,,zm-models4 ,^! two processes are p]=m$1 9 fact1 almo/ simultane\sly due to ?is v close communication4 ,!y are call$ ,m-7,,ym7-,,zm processes4 ,! aim is to make a bett] & bett] ,,zm-model associat$ ) a giv5 ext]nal reality4 ,z we "k1 su* processes g5]ate ! k & ! consci\sness4 ,fac$ ) ! same ext]nal reality1 e bra9 makes & op]ates its own /ructure ( ,m-,,zm models & s its own reality4 ,= ev]yone1 ! reality is g5]at$ by 8_/h] own /ructure ( h>monic_/logic models4 ,f ?is mode ( int]action1 x does n result t fac$ ) ! same ext]nal reality1 ev]yone makes ! same /ructure ( models4 ,example #a3 ,if a pa9t] & a =e/ rang] look at a tree1 ea* w make ano!r ,m-,,zm-model1 & ea* w ?9k & act bas$ on "o's own reality4 ,example #b3 ,:5 we drive a c> 9 ! city1 ,m-models transmit ! full in=mation on :at is ar\nd1 b ,,zm-models1 :i* control ! c>1 w use only "p ( x4 ,z ! spe$ increases1 ,,zm w process a small] & small] "p ( ! ,m-model1 to drive ! c>4 ,?is ph5om5on c be call$ ! n>r[+ ( ! consci\sness field4 ,x occurs e "t :5 ! bra9 is ov]load$4 ,basically speak+1 ev]y?+ :at 0 already pres5t$ up to n[ is ab\t ! same = human & animal bra9s4 ,! exceptions are associat$ ) symbolic models 7:i* are bas$ on logic74 ,! animals _c make any symbolic models4 ,z we "k1 ! basic function ( any bra9 7human or animal7 is to make & op]ate image-models4 ,let's cont9ue ) ! basic diff]5ces betwe5 ! human & animal bra94 ,,! ,,human ,,bra9 7,introduction7 ,! basic diff]5ce betwe5 ! animal bra9 & human bra9 is ! capacity ( ! human bra9 to make & op]ate symbolic models4 ,! animals are n able 9 any way or =m to make & op]ate symbolic models4 ,we already analyz$ h[ a human or animal bra9 int]acts ) an image to make an image-model4 ,= ! symbolic models ! int]action is diff]5t4 ,a symbolic model1 z we "k1 uses z elem5ts lett]s1 words or numb]s4 ,:5 a human bra9 int]acts ) su* elem5ts1 ! ,m-models w conta9 su* elem5ts z specializ$ ,,ym-models4 ,su* ,,ym-models conta9 all ! %apes ( ! lett]s1 = in/ance4 ,x is n necess>y to discov] ! elem5ts1 because !y are !re 9 an explicit way4 ,all ! symbolic elem5ts are conta9$ 9 a symbolic model call$ ,g5]al ,communication ,language 7,,gcl74 ,!re is a spok5 language & a writt5 language1 z directly int]act+ symbolic models4 ,?is is true only = cultural zones :i* use alphabets4 ,!re is a specific application :i* treats ?is problem4 ,= a giv5 writt5 text1 we h all ! elem5ts & all ! relations betwe5 ! elem5ts1 9 an explicit way1 z words4 ,usually1 ! elem5ts are ! n\ns & ! relations betwe5 !m are ! v]bs4 ,any s5t5ce is a symbolic model1 = in/ance4 ,example3 ! s5t5ce3 ,i g home has two elem5ts ,i & home & a relation betwe5 ! elem5ts z g4 ,! /ability ( ! symbolic models is bas$ on logic4 ,:5 a symbolic model is /able we call x a logical model4 ,a logical 7/able7 model c be und]/ood by anybody :o c make & op]ate symbolic models4 ,sometimes !re is a correspond5ce betwe5 image-models & symbolic-models z 9 ! foll[+ example4 ,example3 ,let's analyze ! s5t5ce ,an apple falls f an apple-tree4 ,we h two elem5ts & a relation betwe5 !m4 ,on ! o!r h&1 we c make an image-model t describes ! same situation3 an apple falls f an apple-tree4 ,s1 ! logic c\ld h be5 born 9 ! process ( translation f an image model to a symbolic model 7:5 ! translation is possible74 ,z an image- model is /able bas$ on laws ( h>mony1 a symbolic model is /able bas$ on ! laws ( logic4 ,"h we h 9 an implicit way ! def9itions ( h>mony & logic1 z ! rules & me?ods to ensure ! /ability ( an image-model 7h>mony7 or a symbolic-model 7logic74 ,an implicit def9ition means t we are able to recognize ! effect ( h>mony or logic 9 a /ructure ( data4 ,,! ,,human ,,bra9 ,,v]sus ,,animal ,,bra9 ,,mdt is a !ory t treats ! human & animal bra9 9 ! same framework4 ,i pres5t "h a possible evolution ( ! bra91 f animal bra9 to human bra94 ,x is v important to specify t ! !ory is l a tool3 x does n support & also does n reject ! evolutioni/ !ory4 ,,mdt j describes ! situation4 ,= any ext]nal reality1 ! bra9 7human or animal7 w make an image- model4 ,?is function is basically ! same = human & animal bra94 ,9 a giv5 ext]nal reality _m simil> elem5ts c\ld exi/4 ,= any elem5t1 ! bra9 has to make a ,,ym-model4 ,= in/ance1 a dog has to make a ,,ym = any dog :i* x meets4 ,su* a big numb] ( models use a lot ( ! bra9 res\rces4 ,:5 !re are _m simil> elem5ts1 a solution is to make a concept-,,ym4 ,su* a ,,ym w fit a big numb] ( simil> elem5ts4 ,?is r$uces ! quantity ( data to be process$ by an animal bra91 & s1 ! bra9 becomes fa/] & m effici5t4 ,?us1 ! fir/ level ( evolution ( ! bra9 7level #a7 is ! ext5sive use ( ! concept models4 ,?is level is1 probably1 rea*$ by all animals4 ,obs]vation3 ! human & animal be+s cont9ue to use1 = "s special situations1 pure image models4 ,a pure image model is a ,,ym-model associat$ ) a s+le entity ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,= in/ance1 a cub has a pure image model ( its "m4 ,! fir/ /ep ( ! evolution ( ! bra9 is bas$ on concept models4 ,a concept model fits an entire class ( entities ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,dur+ ! int]action1 ! bra9 w use a concept model & !n1 9 ,m-,,zm1 new prop]ties w be add$1 or ev5 new elem5ts1 if necess>y1 to und]/& bett] & bett] ! ext]nal reality4 ,! evolution ( ! bra9 cont9ues ) level #b4 ,?is new facility is bas$ on label-models4 ,z we "k1 fac$ ) a giv5 ext]nal reality1 ! bra9 makes an ,m-,,zm model t is able to pr$ict ! evolution ( ! pres5t ext]nal reality4 ,su* models are call$ local-,m-,,zm4 ,on level #b1 x is possible to make a new type ( models1 :i* are call$ label-models4 ,a label- model is able to activate a ,,zm-model1 f ! available models ( ! bra91 reg>dless ( ! local-,m-,,zm4 ,example3 an animal s5ses a specific smell4 ,?is c be associat$ ) food or ) dang]1 = in/ance4 ,9 su* a situation1 ! animal c activate a specific ,,zm-model1 :i* has no direct connection ) ! local-,m-,,zm model4 ,?is is level #b ( ! evolution ( ! bra94 ,at ?is level1 a special k9d ( communication betwe5 animals occurs4 ,?is k9d ( communication bas$ on label-models is us$ by human be+s z well4 ,x is n precise en\gh & is also v limit$1 b useful 9 _m situations1 & v fa/ too4 ,! level #b is ! highe/ level a*iev$ by ! animal bra94 ,! evolution ( ! bra9 cont9ues ) level #c4 ,we already saw t1 at level #b1 a label-type model activates a ,,zm model4 ,! next /ep is to activate n ! :ole model1 b only "s associat$ tru? ( ! ,,zm-model4 ,9 ?is way1 ! bra9 has to manage a r$uc$ quantity ( in=mation & s becomes m effici5t4 ,?is is a critical po9t1 because x is ! b>ri] to sep>ate ! animal _w ( human _w4 ,?us1 !re is a ,,zm-model & an associat$ label-model4 ,! problem is to associate to ! label-model only "s tru?s g5]at$ by ! associat$ ,,zm- model4 ,a ,,zm-model is an image model1 & s its tru?s are also ( image-type4 ,! problem is to record su* tru?s 9 a diff]5t way1 bas$ on a totally new function4 ,,mdt _c indicate h[ exactly ?is facility works4 ,! !ory is n conc]n$ ) ! te*nological implem5tation ( ! functions4 ,! !ory j says t "s tru?s g5]at$ by a ,,zm-model h to be record$ 9 a diff]5t way4 ,9 ?is way1 ! label-models become words1 & ! associat$ tru?s become symbolic def9itions ( ! words4 ,on level #c a label-type model c activate an associat$ ,,zm model1 b x c activate only a collection ( tru?s z well1 :i* are diff]5t f ! 'ord9>y' image-tru?s ( ! ,,zm4 ,x is possible t ! ,g5]al ,communication ,language 7,,gcl7 appe>$ bas$ on ?is facility4 ,! pres5ce ( a ,,gcl 9 a bra9 w *>act]ize t bra9 z a human bra94 ,example3 :5 ! ^w dog is he>d1 x is v probable t we activate at lea/ "o suitable ,,zm4 ,b :5 we use ! s5t5ce ,i g to ! =e/ ) a gun & a dog1 x is v probable t we d n activate any ,,zm-model4 ,! s5t5ce is und]/ood bas$ on symbolic models & bas$ on logic & s we d n ne$ any image-model4 ,9 ?is way1 ! quantity ( in=mation t has to be process$ by ! bra9 is r$uc$ v mu*4 ,! image models w be us$ only :5 we h to make a precise model ( ! action4 ,! human bra9 cont9ues to evolve ) level #d4 ,on ?is level we h words & associat$ symbolic def9itions1 b no ,,zm-image-model4 ,example3 ,let's take ! foll[+ words3 ?is apple1 apple1 fruit1 food4 ,?is apple is associat$ ) a pure image model4 ,apple is a concept type image model4 ,fruit & food _c be associat$ ) any image model 7we _c imag9e :at is fruit or :at is food74 ,s1 on level #d1 ! human bra9 c make & op]ate symbolic models )\t any connection ) image-models4 ,on ?is level x is possible to develop logical & ma!matical languages &1 9 ?is way1 to make positive sci5ces associat$ to ! ext]nal reality4 ,example3 ,newton's ,me*anics is a symbolic model associat$ ) ! physical bodies4 ,! basic t]ms ( ?is symbolic model are mass1 space & "t4 ,none ( ^! t]ms c be associat$ ) image models4 ,! evolution ( ! bra9 cont9ues ) level #d1 b ,i pref] to call x level #e 7up to n[ x is ! highe/74 ,?is level 0 atta9$ only #ajj ye>s ago4 ,on ?is level ! symbolic models break totally ) image models4 ,example3 ,newton's ,me*anics describes ! movem5ts ( physical bodies4 ,b we c imag9e su* movem5ts4 ,"h ,newton's symbolic model c be translat$ also 9 image models4 ,! pure symbolic models _c be translat$ 9 any image models4 ,! only symbolic model ( ?is type is ,quantum ,me*anics4 ,example3 9 association ) ,quantum ,me*anics !re is a classical problem call$ ! dual nature ( light4 ,!re are "s exp]im5ts1 :i* prove t light is a wave4 ,b !re are also "s o!r exp]im5ts1 :i* prove t light is made ( p>ticles4 ,x seems t we h big logical problems "h4 ,! ab]ration ) ! dual nature ( light is support$ also by "s great physici/s 7,r4 ,feynman1 = in/ance74 ,physici/s 9 ,quantum ,me*anics already solv$ ! problem ( ! nature ( ! light4 ,! dual nature ( light is n a problem ( ,physics1 b a problem ( ?9k+4 ,! problem occurs :5 ! physici/s try to expla9 to u :at happ5s4 ,at t mom5t1 !y use t]ms z wave or p>ticle :i* are associat$ ) image models4 ,! same t]ms1 9 ,quantum ,me*anics1 are associat$ ) ma!matical =mulae4 ,!re is no connection betwe5 ! _w ( ,quantum ,me*anics & ! _w ( image models4 ,if someone =ces su* a connection1 !n "s big logical problems c occur4 ,z ,,mdt says1 any in=mation is non-s5se )\t decl>+ ! model t g5]at$ t in=mation4 ,9 ! above example1 ! nature ( light is well und]/ood by physici/s 9 ! symbolic model call$ ,quantum ,me*anics4 ,if we don't "k ,quantum ,me*anics1 !n x is n possible to und]/& ! answ]4 ,s1 if we d n "k ,quantum ,me*anics1 !n x is =bidd5 to ask any "q associat$ ) t field4 ,let's evaluate ! _w bas$ on ^! levels4 ,!re is a fraction ( ! population :o is /ay+ on level #b1 & j occasionally goes on level #c4 ,! majority ( ! population is on level #c1 & occasionally goes on level #d4 ,!re is a small fraction1 :i* is on level #d1 & occasionally on level #e4 ,?is fraction produces sci5tific & te*nological advance4 ,to und]/& ! ,,mdt !ory1 at lea/ level #d is necess>y4 ,,human ,,bra93 ,,evolution ,,or ,,ext]nal ,,int]v5tion ,"s activities ( ! human & animal be+s are simil>4 ,s1 !re is an idea t evolution f animal bra9 to human bra9 c\ld be possible4 ,z we already emphasiz$1 ,,mdt is j a tool1 :i* is us$ "h to see if !re is any possibility to evolve f an animal bra9 to a human bra94 ,! !ory does nei!r support1 nor reject su* a possibility4 ,bas$ on ,,mdt1 ! ma9 diff]5ce betwe5 a human bra9 & an animal bra9 is ! facility ( ! human bra9 only1 to make & op]ate symbolic models4 ,! common "p ( ! two types ( bra9s is ! facility to make & op]ate image models4 ,! evolution problem is to see if !re is any possibility to *ange "s p>amet]s 9 ! /ructure ( image-model devices to rea* ! capability ( mak+ & op]at+ symbolic models4 ,on ! o!r h&1 a new h>dw>e t %\ld be add$ to ! animal bra9 is consid]$ z n compatible ) an evolutive process4 ,z we saw 9 ! previ\s section1 ! highe/ level rea*$ by ! animal bra9 is level #b4 ,) a peak on level #e1 ! sup]iority ( ! human bra9 is huge4 ,let's see "s argum5ts t support ! evolutive process4 ,= in/ance1 let's analyze :e!r by increas+ ! level ( conceptualization ( ! models1 x w be possible to get clos] to ! ability to make & op]ate symbolic models4 ,?us1 if a class ( models is m & m conceptualiz$1 su* models %\ld be s simplifi$ t !y c\ld be v close to a symbolic def9ition4 ,!re=e1 a *ange f level #b to level #c c\ld be rea*$ by evolution4 ,b1 let's analyze an example4 ,s1 we h ?is apple1 an apple1 a fruit1 food4 ,?is is an example ( increas+ level ( conceptualization ) ! la/ two items z symbolic elem5ts4 ,! animals h a %ortcut by mak+ a model to tell !m if :at !y meet is or n food4 ,9 ?is way1 ! animals h a fa/ solution = problems bas$ on image models4 ,!re is no advantage to increase ! level ( conceptualization4 ,?us ! evolution c\ld be block$ by a fa/ solution1 bas$ on image-models4 ,! advanc$ conceptualization %\ld be support$ 9 a gr\p ( vuln]able animals4 ,to survive1 ! communication c\ld be decisive4 ,by increas+ ! level ( conceptualization1 ! communication c\ld be m & m precise4 ,?is seems to be ! only s]i\s argum5t = increas+ ! level ( conceptualization4 ,on ! o!r h&1 !re is already a sy/em ( communication on level #b4 ,?us1 a s\nd or a comb9ation ( s\nds is associat$ ) a label-type model4 ,x c activate any ,,zm-model4 ,?is type ( communication is fa/] ?an t bas$ on symbolic models & usually precise en\gh = ! normal necessities ( a gr\p ( animals4 ,un=tunately1 "h we did n see aga9 any advantage f increas+ ! level ( conceptualization4 ,b1 if1 = a gr\p ( animals1 !re is a lot ( in=mation :i* comes 9 fa/ succession1 !n ! animals w be =c$ to make m & m simplifi$ models & ?is %\ld =ce !m to increase ! level ( conceptualization4 ,let's see ano!r example4 ,a p]son goes some:]e 9 ! des]t4 ,)\t special equipm5t1 8 *ance to survive %\ld be v l[4 ,b1 ar\nd him1 c\ld be "s animals :i* survive )\t special ef=ts4 ,= animals1 x is m important to inve/ 9 equipm5t !n to increase ! level ( conceptualization ( ! models4 ,anyways1 at lea/ 9 !ory1 x is possible to evolve f an animal bra9 to a human bra9 bas$ on an increase 9 ! level ( conceptualization4 ,if ! animals h or n ! t5d5cy to d ?is1 is ano!r issue4 ,let's analyze aga9 ! evolution ( ! bra94 ,a concept model is a model :i* fits a l>ge numb] ( entities4 ,x has to be record$1 maybe1 by ! same h>dw>e z ! h>dw>e t records a normal image-model4 ,also1 !re mu/ be a connection betwe5 a concept model & e p>ticul> model cov]$ by x4 ,by increas+ ! level ( conceptualization 7e4g4 f apple to fruit7 ! /ructure becomes v complex4 ,! /ructure becomes ev5 m complex :5 x evolves f fruit to food4 ,9 !ory1 an evolutive process c\ld produce ?is process b ! increase ( ! complexity is s huge t x is difficult to believe t ?is c\ld be produc$ )\t specializ$ h>dw>e4 ,level #b is v close to level #c1 b1 z we see1 no animal 0 able to rea* level #c4 ,ev5 ! mo/ advanc$ animals1 l dolph9s1 h no t5d5cy t[>ds level #c4 ,! fir/ draw+s on cave walls 7 dat$ back to ab\t #aejjjj ye>s ago4 ,su* draw+s mu/ be produc$ by "s long-range image-models4 ,b1 su* draw+s are ( no use )\t "s explanations 7symbolic messages74 ,! reason is t ! same draw+ c be associat$ ) a lot ( situations4 ,x is fair to consid] t1 at t mom5t1 ! primitive human be+s 7 able to use a symbolic model = communication 7a primitive language74 ,"o idea is t ! increas+ capacity ( ! bra9 to make long range image-models 0 a support to make also symbolic models4 ,?is idea _c be support$1 bas$ on ,,mdt4 ,inde$1 ! draw+s made by #e to #ab ye> old *ildr5 are r primitive draw+s4 ,at su* age1 *ildr5 h v few long-range models4 ,b !y are able to make & op]ate symbolic models1 includ+ languages to communicate ) comput]s4 ,?us1 x seems t ! long-range image models are n necess>y to make symbolic models4 ,also1 ?is supports ! idea t ! symbolic models are made by a special h>dw>e4 ,! exi/5ce ( a specializ$ h>dw>e is bas$ on ! foll[+3 ,!re is an image model & ! associat$ label-model 7a ^w74 ,! ^w has a def9ition 7bas$ on o!r words74 ,x is cle> t !re mu/ be a h>dw>e to record ! image-model & ano!r 7associat$7 h>dw>e to record ! def9ition4 ,on level #d1 ! image model does n exi/ anymore4 ,if ?is new h>dw>e %\ld be build bas$ on evolution1 x is difficult to und]/& :y we h no int]m$iate /ages4 ,! dolph9s1 :i* are consid]$ z ! mo/ advanc$ animals1 h no t5d5cy to build symbolic models4 ,!re are "s exp]im5ts ) monkeys1 :i* c be und]/ood z support t "s monkeys are able to make symbolic models4 ,su* cases c be g5]at$ by a s(tw>e implem5tation ( ! function to build & op]ate symbolic models4 ,z we already "k1 a model 9 ,,psm is v effici5t b x blocks ! evolution 7! model is transmitt$ un*ang$ or ) small *anges1 f a g5]ation to ano!r74 ,if an animal builds1 e4g4 by accid5t1 an advanc$ model ( int]action ) ! ext]nal reality1 su* a model _c be transmitt$ to ! next g5]ation4 ,only if a h>dw>e implem5tation exi/s1 a new model w be transmitt$ to ! next g5]ation4 ,?is seems to be a big problem = ! evolution ( ! be+s4 ,)\t a h>dw>e implem5tation1 ! solution is to transmit su* models bas$ on education4 ,if !re 7 gr\ps ( monkeys :i* liv$ toge!r = a v long "t1 !n a good model c\ld be transmitt$ f a g5]ation to ano!r by education4 ,9 ?is way1 a h>dw>e implem5tation is built up also if ! "t available is long en\gh4 ,aft] _m g5]ations ( monkeys :o are =c$ to build symbolic models1 x is possible1 !oretically1 t "s h>dw>e occurs to support ! symbolic model build+4 ,?is c\ld be ! process t g5]at$ ! human bra9 by an evolution process4 ,! ma9 argum5t aga9/ evolution f animals to humans is ! fact t ! #b ye>s old *ildr5 are able to build & op]ate symbolic models4 ,at t age !y hav5't ei!r en\gh long-range models to und]/& ! ext]nal reality & !y are n capable to build su* models4 ,! maturity ( a human be+ is rea*$ ar\nd ! age ( #ah1 & ?us ! facility to build symbolic models is cle>ly a h>dw>e facility4 ,conclusions3 #a4 ,long-range image-models are n an explanation = ! occurr5ce ( symbolic models4 #b4 ,! symbolic-models c\ld occur f image-models by a huge increase 9 ! level ( conceptualization 9 v special conditions 7e4g4 l>ge gr\ps ( monkeys :i* live toge!r = a v long "t74 #c4 ,! symbolic-models are built & op]at$ by a specializ$ h>dw>e4 ,!re are two possibilities3 ei!r evolution if /atem5t #b is valid or ext]nal int]v5tion if n4 ,,basic ,,design ,,deffici5cies ,,( ,,! ,,human ,,bra9 ,! !ory treats ! bra9 z a te*nological product4 ,s1 ! !ory consid]s t a design] exi/$4 ,he _h to fulfil "s design requirem5ts4 ,any te*nological design has "s defici5cies4 ,we %all guess !m 9 ?is section4 ,?is !oretical & ab/ract design] is outside ( ! !ory & we are n int]e/$ by x4 ,x c\ld be ,"m ,nature or ,god or an extrat]re/rial civilization or any?+ else4 ,^! defici5cies are describ$ "h ma9ly = ! human bra91 b "s c be met also 9 ! animal bra94 ,! design defici5cies z ,,mdt c detect !m1 are3 ,,xd#a3 ,! t5d5cy to associate an image-model to any situation met by a p]son4 ,?is defici5cy is expla9$ due to ! image nature ( ! bra94 ,?is defici5cy expla9s :y s _m p]sons /ay on level #c1 :5 level #e is accessible s9ce #ajj ye>s ago4 ,?is defici5cy c be correct$ by education4 ,,xd#b3 ,!re is no h>dw>e protection to prev5t ! uncontroll$ jump f a model to ano!r1 9 int]action ) a complex ext]nal reality4 ,! /ability 9 a model is a quality p>amet] ( a bra94 ,long-range models c /abilize a p]son4 ,! ,,xd#b defici5cy is n relat$ to !m4 ,,xd#b is relat$ to ! capacity to /ay 9 a model1 :5 fac$ ) a complex ext]nal reality4 ,?is defici5cy c be correct$ by s(tw>e 7education1 = in/ance74 ,! lack ( /ability 9 a model c induce ! illness call$ s*izophr5ia because ?is lack ( /ability has ! t5d5cy to favor %ort-range models4 ,inde$1 :5 !re is no /ability 9 a model1 ! bra9 w make a specializ$ model = any p>ticul> situation met 9 ! ext]nal reality4 ,su* models are n able to see t "s diff]5t facts c be correlat$4 ,only a long-range model c detect su* correlation4 ,s1 ! /ability 9 a model is a p>amet] ( quality = a bra9 & ! lack ( /ability indicates a l[ quality bra94 ,?is defici5cy c be met 9 ! animal _w too4 ,= example1 a dog has to wat* a p]imet]4 ,t dog c jump f wat*-model to food-model1 if x gets food f /rang]s4 ,su* a dog is a l[ quality dog1 due to ! lack ( /ability 9 ! model4 ,! dolph9s h a good /ability 9 a model1 & s1 we consid] !m z advanc$ animals4 ,= human be+s1 ! lack ( /ability 9 a model is a major drawback4 ,su* p]sons are n good = any complex activity4 ,,xd#c3 ,?is is a basic defici5cy4 ,let's />t ) its description1 bas$ on examples4 ,s1 ! bra9 int]acts ) an ext]nal reality & makes a h>monic model ) #c elem5ts4 ,if1 t ext]nal reality has1 9 fact1 #d elem5ts1 ! miss+ elem5t _c be discov]$ bas$ on ! #c-;elem5t model4 ,z a #c- elem5t model has a numb] ( wrong pr$ictions1 x is n easy to see :at is ! problem f ! analysis ( ! mi/akes4 ,! reason is t1 once ! #c- elem5t model is activat$1 ! reality is j t "o :i* is g5]at$ by ?is model4 ,!re is no o!r reality6 ,we _c be outside ( our active model4 ,9 su* a case1 ! bra9 tries to correct ! model4 ,usually1 x w try to correct ! model by *ang+ ! importance ( "s elem5ts or relations4 ,sometimes ?is proc$ure works1 & ! bra9 w cont9ue to use ! #c-;elem5t model4 ,su* a situation occurs :5 we h n en\gh long-range models4 ,9 ! above example1 ! situation c be correct$ if !re is a long-range model1 :i* conta9s a #c-;elem5t model z an elem5t ( x4 ,b ev5 s1 by analyz+ ! mi/akes1 x is n easy to und]/& :at is ! problem4 ,a bra9 affect$ by ,,xd#c;,a is n able to pr$ict t a model might be miss+ "s elem5ts4 ,a p]son1 :o c fight ,,xd#c;,a1 c pr$ict su* a situation & w treat any model z prelim9>y4 ,! bra9 makes models bas$ on ! available data4 ,su* models are made 9 a h>monic_/logic way1 b ! /ability ( a model is n a gu>antee t ! model is good 9 int]action ) a complex ext]nal reality4 ,we def9e ,,xd#c;,a z a design defici5cy1 :i* means t a bra9 is n able to pr$ict ! possibility ( a miss+ elem5t or relation 9 a /able 7h>monic or logic7 model4 ,ano!r case3 a bra9 has a /abiliz$ model ) #ajj elem5ts4 ,?is model already g5]at$ a big numb] ( correct pr$ictions4 ,at "o mom5t1 ! ext]nal reality is *ang$1 & n[ !re are #aja elem5ts4 ,z we "k1 to correct a model means to recon/ruct ev]y?+ f scrat*1 us+ or n compon5ts f ! old model4 ,?is task c\ld be s difficult t x exce$s ! te*nical capacity ( ! bra94 ,9 su* a situation ! old model is fragm5t$1 & ! bra9 uses x 9 ?is way4 ,( c\rse1 ?is c produce a lot ( negative effects1 includ+ induc$ psy*iatric disord]s4 ,we def9e ,,xd#c;,b z a design defici5cy1 :i* means t a bra9 is n able to recon/ruct a model1 once ! model is detect$ z a wrong model 9 association ) a new ext]nal reality4 ,we c express ?is also z ! impossibility ( a bra9 to correct a ,,xd#c;,a defici5cy1 once x 0 discov]$4 ,,xd#c-;defici5cies are widespread 9 ! curr5t activity ( human be+s4 ,!re is no ref]5ce to "k t all ! entities ( ! ext]nal reality are associat$ ) ! "r ,y,ms 9 ! associat$ model4 ,= u1 ! ext]nal reality exi/s only if x is associat$ ) a model4 ,once we activat$ su* a model1 ! reality is :at ! model says4 ,we _c be outside ( our active model4 ,once we h a model associat$ ) a specific ext]nal reality1 ! model is consid]$ z a good model bas$ on ! pr$ictions :i* are already done4 ,!re is no gu>antee t ! model w cont9ue to be good 9 any situation & any "t4 ,a good quality bra9 has to "k ?is & to pr$ict "s negative effects associat$ ) su* a situation4 ,s1 ?is defici5cy c be controll$ by s(tw>e 7education1 = in/ance74 ,,xd#d3 ,?is is a defici5cy associat$ only ) image-models4 ,x does n exi/ 9 a symbolic-model environm5t4 ,= an image-model !re is no possibility to "k ! importance ( an elem5t or relation4 ,! bra9 w *oose 9 a m or less arbitr>y way ! importance4 ,a model c be h>monic 7/able7 = any importance :i* is associat$ ) its elem5ts & relations4 ,a lightly negative consequ5ce ( ?is defici5cy is ! fact t1 fac$ ) a giv5 ext]nal reality1 almo/ any p]son makes a p]sonal image-model associat$ ) t ext]nal reality4 ,we w see lat] t1 = extreme situations1 su* defici5cy is associat$ ) ! psy*iatric disord] call$ p>anoia4 ,! symbolic models d n h su* problems4 ,once a symbolic model is made 9 a ma!matical environm5t1 ! law ( ! propagation ( ! errors is able to pr$ict ! importance ( any elem5t or relation4 ,= in/ance1 if we h a complex ma!matical =mula1 ! law ( ! propagation ( ! errors w tell u h[ mu* ! result is *ang$ if an elem5t is *ang$ )1 let's say1 #a4 ,we already us$ ! t]m correct associat$ ) ! importance ( an elem5t or relation 9 an image model4 ,if !re is an ext]nal reality & two associat$ models1 "o image-model & "o symbolic-model1 & if ! two models h ! same pr$ictions1 !n ! importance associat$ ) ! elem5ts & relations ( ! image model is correct4 ,if n1 ! "r importance is t ( ! symbolic model4 ,! above me?od is n good 9 any practical situation4 ,9 fact1 !re is no me?od to "k if we associat$ ! "r importance to any elem5t or relation ( an image-model4 ,?is is ,,xd#d4 ,,xd#e3 ?is defici5cy is a te*nological "o4 ,x means t !re is no h>dw>e or s(tw>e me?od to erase a model ( ! bra94 ,a model is made =ev]4 ,x c be de/roy$ only 9 an uncontroll$ way due to ! biological defici5cies or ! bra94 ,! consequ5ce ( ?is defici5cy is huge 9 _m practical situations4 ,! problem is develop$ m 9 ano!r section ( ?is book4 ,,! ,,/ructure ,,( ,,! ,,bra91 ,,! ,,psm ,,model ,! ,protection & ,surviv+ ,model 7,,psm7 is ! basic image-model ( any bra94 ,:5 a new be+ is born1 x has only ?is model 9 its bra94 ,?is model is v complex & x w be describ$ 9 ?is *apt]4 ,!re is a section ( ! ,,psm1 :i* conta9s a collection ( %ort-range models4 ,!y h to act v fa/ to provide m9imal protection = t be+ 7includ+ newborn be+s7 9 "s specific dang]\s situation4 ,^! activities are call$ reflex actions4 ,! ,,psm conta9s also "s basic models1 l ! model to keep 9 ! eyesight a mov+ entity f ext]nal reality1 or ! model to t\* by h& an entity 9 ! range ( ! h&4 ,!re is also a collection ( models associat$ ) equilibrium & ! g5]al /ability ( ! ext]nal body1 toge!r ) a model ( x1 ( c\rse4 ,!re are also a numb] ( long range models :i* conta9 ! in/9cts to survive unconditionally1 =ev] 7basic design requirem5t74 ,dur+ ! p]iod ( gr[+1 o!rs models c be includ$ 9 ! ,,psm1 models :i* are associat$ ) ! educational process4 ,su* models h to prep>e ! be+ to live 9 a specific ext]nal reality4 ,by accid5t1 any o!r models c ent] ! ,,psm1 b "s ( !m c produce big problems = ! future mature be+1 ma9ly p>anoia type illnesses 7see ,e,t,as74 ,! basic *>act]i/ic ( any model f ! ,,psm is t su* a model is inv>iant4 ,x _c be *ang$ reg>dless ( ! in=mation obta9$ f ! ext]nal reality4 ,! ma9 goal ( ! ,,psm is to ensure t ! be+ w survive unconditionally1 =ev]4 ,to d ?is1 ! ,,psm is able to build elem5ts1 :i* are activat$ to self-develop z models4 ,s1 :5 a new situation f ! ext]nal reality is met1 & !re is no model to und]/& x1 ! ,,psm is automatically activat$ & tries to solve ! problem1 bas$ on "s reflex actions1 or bas$ on "s in/9cts4 ,x also makes a specializ$ elem5t1 :i* is activat$ z a model4 ,! new model tries to und]/& ! new situation by indep5d5t activity1 9 int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,:5 t situation is met aga91 ! ,,psm is n activat$1 & ! specializ$ model solves ! case4 ,s1 z a be+ ga9s m & m exp]i5ce1 ! ,,psm is n activat$1 b "o ( ! specializ$ models is activat$ in/ead4 ,reg>dless ( h[ _m models are 9 a bra91 if a new ext]nal reality occurs & !re is no model to und]/& x1 ! ,,psm w take ! control 9 ! way already describ$4 ,:5 ,,psm controls a be+1 ?is c be recogniz$ by ! fact t ! consci\sness disappe>s1 z ! normal /ructure ( models is deactivat$ by ! ,,psm4 ,?is situation is call$ z %ock-/atus4 ,,! ,,/ructure ,,( ,,! ,,bra93 ,,functional ,,facilities ,,& ,,types ,,( ,,models ,a basic functional facility ( ! bra9 is t any model c develop any ( its elem5ts z a model4 ,once a model activates an elem5t1 t elem5t is able to develop itself z a model1 by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality & ) any o!r model ( ! bra94 ,ano!r functional facility is describ$ "h4 ,we see t a model c activate any ( its elem5ts to develop itself z a model4 ,b1 ev5 if an elem5t is already develop$ z a model1 ! ma9 model cont9ues to treat x z an elem5t4 ,?is important feature w be develop$ bel[4 ,s1 a ma9 model has an elem5t4 ,?is elem5t has "s prop]ties4 ,to integrate t elem5t1 ! ma9 model uses ^! prop]ties4 ,n[1 ! problems c\ld be l3 :y t elem5t has su* prop]ties8 or h[ su* prop]ties c be *ang$8 ,to answ] su* que/ions1 ! ma9 model has to develop ! elem5t z a model4 ,once an elem5t is develop$ z a model1 its prop]ties appe> to be tru?s g5]at$ by ! model4 ,s1 dep5d+ ( ! po9t ( view1 ref]r+ to ! same entity1 we discuss ab\t an elem5t ) "s prop]ties1 or ab\t a model ) "s associat$ tru?s4 ,once an elem5t is develop$ z a model1 ! model c be *ang$4 ,a *ang$ model w h o!r associat$ tru?s1 s t1 :5 treat$ z an elem5t ( ! ma9 model1 x has ano!r set ( prop]ties4 ,?us ! prop]ties _c be *ang$ 9 a direct way1 b ?r\gh ! *anges 9 ! model4 ,9 any case1 a ma9 model c op]ate only ) elem5ts1 reg>dless ( ! fact t ! elem5t is or n already develop$ z a model4 ,we already use t]ms z long range models or %ort range models4 ,let's def9e !m4 ,a long-range model has already be5 def9$ z a model ) its own elem5ts develop$ z models4 ,b "h we w pref] ano!r alt]native def9ition4 ,a long-range model is a model :i* rea*es its aims by activation & deactivation ( "s ( its elem5ts4 ,su* elem5ts are already develop$ z models4 ,a %ort-range model rea*es its aims by direct activation4 ,example3 to swit* on ! light 9 a room1 a ,,zm model w make a ,,zam4 ,t ,,zam w simulate ! action4 ,bas$ on ?is simulation x w activate an ,,azm :i*1 9 turn1 w swit* on ! light4 ,! ,,zm-model w confirm ! success ( ! activity ( ! %ort-range ,,zam model4 ,example3 ,to travel f a place to ano!r1 a ,,zm w make a ,,zam4 ,! ,,zam w make "s ,z,a,ms4 ,^! ,z,a,ms w make "s o!rs ,z,a,ms4 ,= any specific activity !re w be a ,,zam4 ,once a ,,zam has rea*$ its aim1 x w be deactivat$ by ! ,,zam-model :i* activat$ x1 & a new ,,zam is activat$4 ,! g5]al control belongs to ! ma9-,,zam4 ,! ma9-,,zam c be modifi$ by ! ma9 ,,zm4 ,long-range models d su* activity4 ,example3 we ent] a room & swit* on ! light4 ,! light really swit*es on4 ,a local-,,zm gets ?is in=mation bas$ on ,,ir4 ,b1 a long-range ,,zm1 :i* conta9s ! local-,,zm z an elem5t1 und]/&s t ! light _h be5 brok51 & n[ x is on4 ,! local-,,zm acts "h z a %ort]-range model4 ,x does n und]/& ! g5]al environm5t4 ,! ma9-,,zm 7:i* conta9s ! local-,,zm z elem5t7 is a long-range model4 ,we already saw t any model c activate any ( its elem5ts to self-develop z a model4 ,once an elem5t is activat$1 x develops itself z a model4 ,9 turn1 ?is new model c also activate z a model any ( its elem5ts4 ,?is dep? has only te*nological limits4 ,9 fact1 almo/ any model ( ! bra9 is a long-range model4 ,! def9itions1 :i* are already giv51 respect ?is feature4 ,n[ we %all pres5t a li/ ) ! ma9 models ( a bra93 ,,zam3 ^! models are usually long-range models4 ,a ,,zm model makes !m4 ,_! ma9 function is to *ange ! ext]nal reality4 ,!y are made = imm$iate activation 7to dr9k wat] f a glass1 = in/ance7 or !y c\ld be models t give ! ori5tation ( ! :ole life ( a p]son or any?+ betwe5 ^! v l>ge limits4 ,su* models are n *ang$ by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,if a ,,zam fails to d some?+1 ! upp] ,,zam or ! local-,,zm w build & activate ano!r ,,zam4 ,dur+ _! activity1 !y h full access to any res\rce ( ! bra9 7int]nal or ext]nal1 by a ,,zm model74 ,,azm3 ^! %ort-range models are direct-action models4 ,!y are connect$ directly to diff]5t organs :i* c act on ! ext]nal reality 7h&s1 legs447 ,!y keep precise in=mation ab\t su* organs4 ,:5 a ,,zam model has to make a simulation ( a specific action1 ! ,,azm models h to give precise in=mation ab\t e feature ( ! associat$ organs4 ,ref]r+ to ,,zam & ,,azm models1 any action on ! ext]nal reality is bas$ on a simulation4 ,)\t a successful simulation1 ! bra9 is n able to d any activity4 ,once a simulation is a success1 ! ma9 ,,zam w activate ! action 79 connection ) local-,,zm74 ,! action w be ! same z ! simulat$ action4 ,?is proc$ure is foll[$ by any ,,zam 9 any activity4 ,!re are "s exceptions4 ,:5 ! ,,psm takes control1 "s reflex-models are activat$ )\t initialization & )\t simulation4 ,! reason is ! highe/ spe$ ( action1 ev5 if ! action is n ! "r "o4 ,,active-,,type ,,models 7normal ,,zm-models7 ,,zm models are made ma9ly by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,!y g5]ate ! k & consci\sness4 ,!y are self-activat$ 9 any situation :5 !y are able to pr$ict 9 a good way ! possible evolution ( a giv5 ext]nal reality4 ,a ,,zm1 :i* int]acts directly ) ! ext]nal reality1 is also a model1 :i* controls ! :ole body4 ,!y build1 activate & deactivate any ,,zam1 bas$ on a set ( goals4 ,a long-range ,,zm model also controls a local-,,zm4 ,?is is able to modify a local-,,zm model1 bas$ on long-range pr$ictions4 ,! :ole activity is sup]vis$ by ,,psm4 ,usually ! ,,psm is activat$ only :5 all ! available ,z,ms fail to control ! int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,a ,,zm model has full access to all ! res\rces ( ! bra94 ,x c take any in=mation f any "p ( ! bra9 & c make any model bas$ on any available in=mation4 ,by analyz+ ! normal activity ( ! bra91 "o und]/&s t "s activities use only a limit$ numb] ( models4 ,! access to "s models is easi] ?an to o!rs4 ,we c f9d v fa/ "s in=mation & f9d m sl[ly o!r4 ,?is sugge/s t "s models1 :i* are usually employ$ toge!r1 are gr\p$4 ,we def9e a quasi-/ructure ( models call$ ,,mzm4 ,a ,,mzm is a gr\p ( models1 :i* are us$ (t5 toge!r4 ,!y c be associat$ ) "s specific complex activities 7job1 hobby1 family life1 c> driv+ & s on74 ,,/ory-,,type ,,models ,^! are transition-,z,ms4 ,:5 !re are "s in=mation f ! ext]nal reality1 ! normal activity ( ! bra9 is to build a normal ,,zm-model or to f9d ! be/ available ,,zm to integrate t in=mation4 ,:5 ! quantity ( in=mation is high1 ! bra9 has no te*nical possibility to foll[ ?is normal mode ( int]action4 ,x is =c$ j to record ! in=mation 9 a /r+-type mode4 ,su* a record ( data is call$ a /ory-type model 7,s-,m74 ,note3 "s p]sons :o already read ?is book 7 di/urb$ by ! fact t !re are _m sequ5ces :i* are repeat$ 9 diff]5t p>ts ( ! book4 ,un=tunately = su* p]sons1 ?is happ5$ because !y make /ory-type models in/ead ( a normal model4 ,if !y make /ory-type models & if !re is a repeat$ sequ5ce1 ! local-,,zm w jump back to ! place :]e ! in=mation 0 previ\sly met4 ,at t mom5t1 ! /ory-type models are fragm5t+4 ,! p]son has lo/ ! connection ) ! /ory-type model & is =c$ to make a new "o4 ,also1 ! p]son c\ld try to reconnect ! old model ) ! new "o1 b ?is is difficult4 ,= a p]son :o makes a normal model1 :5 a sequ5ce is repeat$1 ?is sequ5ce w only confirm ! normal model & ?is is v good = ! model4 ,/ory-type models c be us$ z a s\rce ( in=mation to make or develop1 (f-l9e1 normal models4 ,any elem5t ( su* models c be develop$ z a normal model lat]4 ,al?\gh _m p use ?is type ( int]action ) ! ext]nal reality1 ?is mode ( int]action is n effici5t & uses a lot ( ! limit$ res\rces ( ! bra94 ,inde$1 a /ory-type-model records ! in=mation 9 an explicit way1 ab\t ! same way z x is record$ on a tape-record]4 ,?is mode is a v primitive way ( record+ data4 ,a normal model c g5]ate a huge quantity ( in=mation by simulation4 ,su* in=mation is n record$ !re 9 an explicit way4 ,ev5 m1 a /ory-type model introduces non-normal relations betwe5 "s elem5ts4 ,z we "k1 a /ory-type model is made by elem5ts connect$ betwe5 !m 9 ! ord] ( occurr5ce4 ,s1 two elem5ts1 :i* c\ld h no connection betwe5 !m1 c\ld be record$ ) a relation betwe5 !m if !y occurr$ toge!r4 ,anyway1 !re is no control & no long-range model to control ! record+ ( a /ory-type model4 ,un=tunately1 su* models are v spread out all ov] ! _w1 due to ! fact t !re is too mu* in=mation1 & due to "s big defici5cies ( ! education policy4 ,s1 an education bas$ on normal models w r$uce v mu* ! quantity ( in=mation1 :i* has to be process$ by a bra94 ,! pres5t education policy is bas$ on assimilation ( ext]nal models4 ,t is1 ! capacity to build models is n us$4 ,s1 fac$ ) a huge quantity ( in=mation1 ! population is =c$ to make /ory-type models4 ,?is w r$uce ev5 m ! capacity ( ! population to make normal models4 ,example3 a taxi driv] mu/ "k any r\te 9 a city4 ,!re is a huge numb] ( su* r\tes & he has to le>n ea*1 bo? directions4 ,if ! normal model ( ! city is le>n$1 !n t taxi driv] is able to f9d a r\te 9 any conditions4 ,except = ! normal model ( ! city1 x is n necess>y to le>n any?+ else4 ,by /ory-type models 7to le>n r\tes7 he has to increase ! quantity ( in=mation ) e new r\te4 ,?is is an example1 b ! situation is met 9 almo/ any field ( activity4 ,9 practice1 bo? me?ods are us$4 ,/ory-type models develop$ z long-range models are v dang]\s1 because !y c /imulate induc$-p>anoia 7,,xip7 or a s*izophr5ic-p>anoiac complex 7,,xspc74 ,?is is s because a /ory-type model has special relations betwe5 its elem5ts4 ,su* relations are g5]at$ by ! arbitr>y occurr5ce ( ! elem5ts & ?us1 to trans=m ! /ory-type model into a family ( normal models becomes difficult 7! bra9 has to build f scrat* sev]al new normal models1 bas$ on ! in=mation g5]at$ by a /ory-type model1 & ?is is n easy74 ,! /ory-type models are integrat$ 9 ! normal /ructure ( models & !y are controll$ by t /ructure4 ,,%ield+ ,,models ,we already saw t any model evolves indep5d5tly1 by itself1 bas$ on ! in=mation tak5 f ext]nal reality or f o!rs models4 ,! aim ( any model is to ga9 its /ability4 ,once a model has a problem1 x w cont9ue to be active up to ! mom5t :5 x rega9s /ability4 ,!re are "s problems )\t solution4 ,! model w cont9ue to look = a solution =ev]4 ,?is activity c produce negative effects on ! ov]all /ability ( ! /ructure ( models ( ! bra9 7x consumes a lot ( en]gy74 ,! ma9 problem )\t solution is dea? 7human be+s only74 ,?is is a basic problem4 ,s1 !re is a model :i* pr$icts ! dea? ( a p]son & t model has no solution to ! problem4 ,:5 !re is no model to solve a problem1 ! ,,psm is activat$4 ,! ,,psm has no solution too & s x w make a specific model to solve ! problem4 ,b ! new model has no solution ei!r1 & s1 a dang]\s loop is activat$4 ,?is activity c\ld be v dang]\s = ! /ability ( ! /ructure ( models ( any mature human be+4 ,s9ce ! olde/ times1 ! human be+s f\nd a solution3 %ield+ models4 ,a %ield+ model is a model1 :i* is made to prev5t a normal model f activat+ ! ,,psm & also to transmit to ! model ) problems "s in=mation to /abilize x4 ,! be/-kn[n %ield+ model is religion4 ,obs]vation3 z a p]son becomes old] & old]1 ! pr$iction ( dea? is m & m precise4 ,! p]son has ! t5d5cy to become m & m religi\s4 ,also1 :5 a population is "u /ress1 x has also ! t5d5cy to become m & m religi\s4 ,a %ield+ model is associat$ to a normal model :i* has problems4 ,a %ield+ model is n bas$ on ext]nal reality4 ,x _c be includ$ 9 a normal model1 z ! normal model _c include a model :i* is n bas$ on ext]nal reality4 ,! reality g5]at$ by a %ield+ model c be call$ illusion4 ,! %ield+ model c be made = any problem )\t solution4 ,su* models r$uce ! nons5se activity ( a bra9 & s1 !re is m en]gy to solve ! normal problems4 ,b1 su* models c\ld be also v dang]\s4 ,! activation ( a %ield+ model also deactivates ! protection /ructure ( a p]son or at lea/ "s section ( x4 ,! %ield+ models are ! ma9 models1 :i* c pass f 'normal-to-,,psm' zone to ,,psm4 ,su* *anges c\ld be v dang]\s = t be+1 because "s protection models are deactivat$ =ev]4 ,! %ield+ models are p>tially integrat$ 9 ! normal /ructure ( models & s1 ! /ructure c1 p>tially1 control !m4 ,,activable ,,models 7,,wbam7 ,a ,,zm c\ld pr$ict a future situation ( ! ext]nal reality1 :i* has no associat$ model4 ,su* a situation c activate ! ,,psm4 ,to prev5t ?is1 ! ,,zm c make a w\ld-be active-type model 7,,wbam74 ,su* a model is n creat$ by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,su* a ,,wbam acts z a %ield+ model up to ! la/ mom5t be=e ! activation4 ,aft] activation1 x becomes a normal ,,zm model4 ,a normal ,,zm is built 9 direct int]action ) ext]nal reality4 ,w,b,a,ms c be associat$ ) ! ext]nal reality )\t previ\s int]action ) x4 ,note3 ! emotion is def9$ 9 ,,mdt z a transi5t situation betwe5 ! activation ( ! ,,psm & ! mom5t :5 a normal suitable model is activat$4 ,! activation ( ! ,,psm c be prev5t$ by a good ,,wbam 7( c\rse1 if t situation 0 pr$ict$ by a ma9 ,,zm74 ,w,b,a,ms are includ$ 9 ! normal /ructure ( ! models & !y are controll$ by x4 ,,illegal ,,models 7,,xzm7 ,all types ( models describ$ up to n[ are normal models4 ,!y are includ$ 9 a h>monic_/logic way 9 ! /ructure4 ,!re are "s models1 :i* are n includ$ 9 ! normal /ructure ( models1 or !y h lo/ _! normal connection to ! /ructure4 ,su* models are call$ illegal models or ,,xzm4 ,!re are _m situations :i* c produce illegal models4 ,a case is :5 a new model is n f9i%$ because ! specific ext]nal reality1 :i* produc$ x1 is no met anymore4 ,= in/ance1 somebody has be5 involv$ 9 a c> accid5t4 ,a new model is />t$1 b because su* situation w n be met aga9 9 ! ne> future1 ! model is n f9i%$1 because !re is no ext]nal reality to f9i% x4 ,su* model c\ld evolve z an illegal model4 ,obs]vation3 !re is an empirical me?od ( ! classical psy*iatry to /imulate or ev5 to =ce a p]son 7ma9ly *ildr57 to tell ev]y?+ :i* is associat$ ) a traumatic situation4 ,,mdt says t su* a me?od is v good because1 9 ?is way1 a possible illegal model w be =c$ to connect to ! normal /ructure ( models & s1 ! long-range negative effects are prev5t$4 ,z we see1 ,,mdt c expla9 exactly :y ?is psy*iatric empirical proc$ure is good1 z ,,mdt 0 n ev5 creat$ specifically = ! psy*iatric field6 ,ano!r situation :5 an ,,xzm c\ld be creat$ is :5 a model is too l>ge4 ,su* a model c\ld be fragm5t$ & "s compon5ts c lose ! normal connection ) ! /ructure4 ,! fragm5ts c evolve z illegal models4 ,! /ory-type models are also c&idates to become ,,xzm 7at lea/ "s p>ts ( !m74 ,a major cause ( ! occurr5ce ( illegal models is te*nological problems4 ,z we "k1 a normal /ructure ( models is made ( _m models1 :i* are connect$ toge!r 9 a h>monic_/logic way4 ,! models communicate betwe5 !m b1 if ! communication is n good due to te*nological problems1 "s models c become illegal4 ,su* process c also g5]ate half-,,xzm models4 ,su* models h little communications ) ! o!r models1 or ! communication c be only 9 association ) "s o!r models1 or only 9 association ) "s specific situations ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,because su* models are no controll$ anymore by ! normal /ructure ( models1 !y c conta9 any?+4 ,!y c obta9 in=mation f ! ext]nal reality or f o!r models1 or !y c create & activate models :i* c act on ! ext]nal reality 7,,zam & ,,azm74 ,,xzm models c\ld be dang]\s1 or ev5 v dang]\s1 because a p]son c d "s ?+s outside 8_/h] consci\sness4 ,a p]son t has su* models does n "k t su* models exi/ 9 8_/h] bra94 ,"s ( ^! models c be detect$ dur+ hypnosis practice4 ,x,z,ms c expla9 somnambuli/-effect1 d\ble-p]sonality1 & _m illogical or biz>re activities4 ,!y c also expla9 "s crimes1 includ+ ! s]ial-kill] ph5om5on or t]rorism-relat$ crimes4 ,su* a p]son is j remote-controll$ by ! ,x,z,ms4 ,! illegal models c expla9 also "s p>anormal ph5om5a4 ,,p>anormal ,,ph5om5a ,telepa?y is consid]$ z a direct communication betwe5 two bra9s4 ,ev5 m1 ?is k9d ( communication is p]=m$ at great di/ance betwe5 ! two bra9s & ?r\gh any k9d ( m$ia4 ,un=tunately1 ?is k9d ( transmission ( in=mation is n possible1 bas$ on ! laws ( ! nature4 ,9 ord] to transmit in=mation1 x is necess>y to transmit en]gy at ! di/ance4 ,! kn[n fields ( =ces 7electric1 magnetic1 electro-magnetic & gravitational7 d n meet ! requirem5ts = su* a transmission4 ,ev5 m1 ev5 if !re is a field ( =ces :i* c propagate at l>ge di/ance ?r\gh any k9d ( mat]ial1 9 ord] to transmit in=mation1 modulation ( ! en]gy1 dep5d+ on ! in=mation1 is also necess>y4 ,at ! receiv] x is necess>y to demodulate ! en]gy *anges1 9 ord] to get ! message4 ,"s c\ld say t ! in=mation c\ld be transmitt$ by a '%ortcut'1 )\t transmitt+ ! en]gy at ! di/ance4 ,?is int]f]es ) ! basics ( ! sci5ces ( nature4 ,anyways1 ,i believe 9 natural sci5ces1 & ! only conclusion is t1 = n[ & =ev]1 telepa?y1 z a direct transmission ( in=mation f a bra9 to ano!r1 does n exi/4 ,,mdt expla9s telepa?y 9 ! frame ( ! laws ( nature1 )\t any k9d ( transmission ( in=mation at ! di/ance4 ,! ph5om5on is bas$ on ! huge capacity ( ! bra9 to process in=mation & on ,,xzm models4 ,z we "k1 ! basic function ( any bra9 is to make models & to simulate ! possible evolution ( !m4 ,a model1 :i* is associat$ ) an ext]nal reality1 is able to pr$ict ! evolution ( t ext]nal reality4 ,s1 at any mom5t1 we make pr$ictions associat$ ) ! ext]nal reality1 & ! majority ( !m are good4 ,n[1 let's suppose t a p]son has a special relation ) ano!r p]son1 z a "m & h] *ild1 = in/ance4 ,! model associat$ ) h] *ild c\ld h be5 active = _m ye>s4 ,su* a model c\ld become a ,,xzm model4 ,?is ,,xzm is active outside ! control ( ! "m4 ,su* an ,,xzm c\ld simulate ! int]action betwe5 ! *ild & diff]5t k9ds ( environm5ts4 ,:5 a negative pr$iction occurs1 su* a model c transmit a message to ! local-,,zm4 ,! "m receives a message4 ,! receiv] _c f9d ! s\rce & ! reason = t message1 because an ,,xzm-model1 n belong+ to ! normal /ructure ( models1 transmits ! message4 ,x is v easy to consid] t su* a message is transmitt$ by telepa?y4 ,s1 ,,mdt consid]s t su* messages are g5]at$ by simulation on an ,,xzm- model & s1 !y are j pr$ictions4 ,9 "s cases1 su* pr$ictions c\ld be correct 7! pr$ictions :i* are n correct are =gott5 66674 ,su* messages are n relat$ ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,"s ( su* pr$ictions c\ld also be obta9$ dur+ a hypnosis session1 because hypnosis is associat$ only ) ,x,z,ms4 ,! same basic explanation is valid = ! clairvoyance ph5om5on4 ,9 su* a case1 ! ,,xzm is associat$ ) a specific ext]nal reality1 or ) an illness4 ,su* pr$ictions c\ld be correct = _m situations1 b1 because !y are j pr$ictions1 !re is a limit$ gu>antee on _! correctness4 ,example3 a p]son 0 se5 by a clairvoyance m$ium4 ,?is m$ium 0 ask$ on ! /atus ( ! he>t ( t p]son4 ,! answ] 0 t ! he>t is 9 a good %ape4 ,! answ] 0 correct4 ,b !re 0 a little problem3 t p]son 0 we>+ a pacemak]1 :i* 0 n se5 by ! m$ium1 9 accordance ) ,,mdt4 ,,mdt c be us$ to see h[ to develop su* p>anormal qualities4 ,fir/ ( all1 = x1 let's rememb] t ,,xzm are image models & s1 develop+ ! int]action ) ext]nal reality bas$ on image models is /rongly recomm5d$4 ,also1 a natural t5d5cy t[>ds image models is m&atory4 ,su* p]sons mu/ be well balanc$1 or able to obta9 a /ability /atus by diff]5t me?ods1 s t ! normal /ructure ( models has a r$uc$ activity4 ,su* p]sons mu/ h a r$uc$ t5d5cy to control ! activity associat$ ) ! problem 7to r$uce ev5 m ! activity ( ! normal /ructure ( models74 ,x is also v important to obta9 z mu* z possible in=mation by direct int]action 7bas$ on image models7 ) ! problem4 ,! in=mation bas$ on symbolic models c\ld be useful too1 aft] translation on image models4 ,,mdt consid]s t ,,xzm models are image models4 ,b1 !re is a supposition t "s symbolic-models c\ld be illegal too4 ,if s1 an ,,xzm-symbolic model c\ld expla91 e4g41 h[ "s p]sons c p]=m extremely complicat$ ari?metical op]ations4 ,,! ,,normal ,,human ,,bra9 ,?is section 0 int5d$ to treat ! subject decl>$1 b in/ead1 x is j an evaluation ( ! problem4 ,! reason is ! inexi/5ce ( suffici5t data on ,,xzm models4 ,to make a local model on ! normal human bra91 we take "s conditions f ,,mdt1 z foll[s3 ,c#a3 ,! ,,psm mu/ act to protect ! be+ & to ensure ! unconditional survival1 =ev]1 ( t be+4 ,! ,,psm mu/ also conta9 "s models associat$ ) ! society 9 :i* ! be+ lives4 ,! ,,psm mu/ n conta9 ord9>y models4 ,c#b3 ,any model ( ! bra9 mu/ be /able 7h>monic or logic74 ,c#c3 ,! :ole /ructure ( models mu/ be /able4 ,t is1 any tru? ( any model mu/ be accept$ 7or at lea/ n reject$7 by any o!r model ( ! bra94 ,let's develop a little ?is local model4 ,! ma9 condition ( normality is t ! p]son has to be accept$ by ! society4 ,t is1 ! p]son has to integrate 9 t society4 ,= a cannibal- type society1 ! p]son has to integrate 9 t society4 ,o!rwise he w be reject$ by ! society4 ,! limits or normality are1 z we see1 v broad4 ,= a democratic society ( our "t1 "s ( ! conditions ( normality are n to kill1 n to /eal & s on4 ,su* models mu/ be 9 ! ,,psm & ?is goal is a*iev$ by education s9ce _m g5]ations4 ,let's consid] t a p]son makes a model to kill someone4 ,if ?is model is block$ by ,,psm1 t p]son c be consid]$ z a normal "o4 ,h[ev]1 if a p]son makes a model to kill someone &1 9 "s conditions1 ! ,,psm does n "w prop]ly1 t model c be activat$4 ,bas$ on ,,mdt1 su* a situation is a h>dw>e problem & s1 t p]son is n a normal "o4 ,9 classical psy*iatry1 !y make a te/ to und]/& if ! p]son 0 or n responsible = 8_/h] acts4 ,bas$ on ,,mdt1 z ,i said1 "h we h a h>dw>e problem & s1 ! fact t ! p]son 0 or n consci\s ( :at he 0 do+ is n relevant4 ,ev5 m1 bas$ on ,,mdt1 a model _c be de/roy$ by any h>dw>e or s(tw>e facility ( ! bra94 ,s1 a puni%m5t has no effect4 ,if a bra9 has a h>dw>e problem1 !re is no solution to correct x4 ,! ma9 reason is ! fact t any model is connect$ ) almo/ all ! models ( ! bra94 ,ev5 ,x,z,ms mu/ h "s connections4 ,9 ord] to remove a model by ext]nal action1 x is necess>y to "k ! exact h>dw>e /ructure ( t bra9 & ?is1 z ,i ?9k1 w be n possible at lea/ 9 ! next #ej ye>s4 ,c#a ass]ts also ! condition t ! bra9 mu/ n conta9 ord9>y models 7,o4,m474 ,?is condition is necess>y because if an ,o4,m4 is includ$ 9 ,,psm1 t model becomes inv>iant 7x _c be *ang$ by any in=mation f ! ext]nal reality74 ,s1 if an ,o4,m4 is includ$ 9 ,,psm1 any in=mation obta9$ by ,,ir f ext]nal reality mu/ be compatible ) t ,,ompsm4 ,if n1 t in=mation mu/ be di/ort$ to meet1 someh[1 ! condition reque/$ by ! ,,ompsm4 ,:5 !re is an ,,ompsm 9 ! bra91 ?is is an illness call$ p>anoia4 ,a p]son ) an ,,ompsm mu/ di/ort ! in=mation obta9$ f ext]nal reality to meet ! conditions reque/$ by ! ,,ompsm4 ,example3 ,! au!ntic communi/s h includ$ 9 ,,psm ! ,,ompsm call$ ! work+ class is ! lead] ( ! society4 ,reg>dless ( ! ext]nal reality1 !y h a h>monic_/logic /ructure ( models bas$ on ?is model4 ,=tunately1 ! absolute majority ( ! communi/s h no su* model includ$ 9 ,,psm & s1 !y are normal p]sons4 ,example3 ,usually1 drugs create an ,,ompsm call$ use !m4 ,su* p]sons w cont9ue to use drugs reg>dless ( any in=mation associat$ ) _! negative effects4 ,?is is a special k9d ( p>anoia4 ,example3 smok+ is also a =m ( p>anoia1 due to ! same reason1 z above4 ,aft] _m ye>s ( smok+1 "s p]sons c give up smok+4 ,?is c\ld happ5 if1 = in/ance1 ! p]son gets ill4 ,! illness c\ld make a non- smok+ model1 :i* ent]s ! ,,psm too4 ,! ,c#c-;condition /ates t ! :ole /ructure ( models mu/ be h>monic_/logic4 ,?is condition is n easy to meet4 ,fir/ ( all1 !re is a limit$ capacity to refre% ! :ole /ructure ( models4 ,! refre% capacity = "s p]sons c\ld be "u ! requirem5ts4 ,su* p]sons c\ld evolve to a =m ( s*izophr5ia4 ,let's consid] n[ a p]son-,a1 :o meets ! ,c#c crit]ium4 ,at "o mom5t1 an important model becomes useless 7= in/ance1 an important p]son ,b disappe>s f ! life ( ,a74 ,9 su* case1 p]son-,a has to refre% ! :ole /ructure ( models4 ,?is task c\ld exce$ ! te*nical capacity ( refre% 7ma9ly = old] p]sons74 ,x ! refre% capacity is exce$$1 "o possibility is to make %ield+ models4 ,if a p]son has too _m %ield+ models1 su* a p]son _c be consid]$ z a normal p]son4 ,su* p]sons c be detect$1 e4g4 due to ! fact t !y don't want1 or !y _c discuss ab\t "s subjects4 ,,xzm models are n tak5 into acc\nt because ( ! lack ( en\gh data ab\t !m4 ,x,z,ms c expla9 ! somnambuli/ic-effect1 multiple p]sonalities or ev5 "s nons5se crimes4 ,!re are kill]s :o don't "k :y !y kill o!r p4 ,_m ( !m seem to be normal p]sons1 z _! fri5ds c confirm & also !y c be integrat$ 9 society4 ,x,z,ms c be an explanation = _! crimes4 ,inde$1 an ,,xzm is a model :i* is out ( ! control ( ! normal /ructure ( models4 ,su* models c become active-models 9 "s situations 7due to ! h>dw>e problems ( t bra974 ,! kill] is s remotely-controll$ by ! ,,xzm4 ,su* kill]s _c be detect$ by a lie detector4 ,! explanation is ! fact t !re is no normal model t makes ! crime & s1 !re is no reason to pret5d or hide some?+4 ,z ,i said1 ?is section is j = evaluation4 ,z new data w be obta9$ 9 association ) ,x,z,ms1 ! section w be develop$4 ,,! ,,ab/ract ,,( ,,! ,,functional ,,facilities ,,( ,a ,,bra9 ,let's make an ab/ract ab\t all ! functional facilities ( a human bra94 ,almo/ all ! facilities1 :i* are n relat$ ) symbolic-models1 are ! same = animals4 ,,bf#a3 ,to make models associat$ or n ) a section ( ! ext]nal reality ,,bf#b3 ,to refre%1 on & on1 ! ,m-models by pr$iction & comp>ison ) ,,ir1 s t ,m-models reflect bett] & bett] ! dynamic ext]nal reality4 ,,bf#c3 ,! cont9u\s self-refre%+ ( "s ,,zm c\pl$ ) ,m-models4 ,! goal is t ^! ,,zm-models reflect bett] & bett] ! ext]nal reality4 ,= ?is1 ,,zm mu/ take into acc\nt any o!r ,,zm-model ( ! bra9 z well4 ,,bf#d3 ,to simulate1 cont9u\sly1 ! possible evolution ( ! associat$ ext]nal reality1 ev5 :5 a ,,zm is n connect$ to ,m-models4 ,,bf#e3 ,"o ( ! ma9 conditions1 :i* mu/ be fulfill$ by any model1 is to become /able 7h>monic or logic74 ,t is1 any simulation on a model mu/ reconfirm ! model 9 ! same %ape4 ,if a di%>mony or logical contradiction is detect$1 ! model mu/ rega9 its /ability by ,,ir 7f ext]nal reality or f o!r models74 ,moreov]1 z any model is already integrat$ 9 a /ructure ( models1 any o!r model mu/ accept any result ( any simulation on any model4 ,?is condition ensures ! g5]al /ability ( a /ructure ( models4 ,a real bra9 does n easily meet ?is condition4 ,,bf#f3 ,any ,z,ms are able to activate1 9 "t %>+1 _m ,,zam models to d _m activities4 ,h[ev]1 !re is a s+le ,,zam :i* c act on ! ext]nal reality at a giv5 mom5t ( "t4 ,! reason = x is t1 be=e activation1 any model ne$s to initialize us+ data tak5 f ext]nal reality4 ,:5 a ,,zam is deactivat$1 x ne$s to /ore data = future reactivation4 ,?is me?od is fa/1 b if ext]nal reality is *ang$ too mu*1 su* data is no m valid4 ,9 ?is case1 ! activat$ ,,zam has to f9d ! new conditions ( initialization1 bas$ on ,z,ms4 ,! bra9 uses bo? me?ods4 ,by description ( ! process1 we see t x is n easy to d _m activities at ! same "t 79 "t-%>+71 & x is easy to make mi/akes4 ,,bf#g3 ,! facility ( any model to ga9 in=mation f any o!r model ( ! bra94 ,h[ev]1 due to ! te*nological implem5tation1 x is possible t "s models h a bett] communications ) "s models1 & n z easy communication ) o!r models4 ,,bf#h3 ,any model has ! facility to develop any ( its elem5ts z models4 ,?us1 x is possible to h a ne/$ /ructure ( models4 ,! dep? ( ?is /ructure has only te*nological limitations4 ,^! facilities g5]ate ! k & ! consci\sness1 bas$ on a /ructure ( /able 7h>monic or logic7 models4 ,su* /ructure is able to self-develop 9 an unkn[n ext]nal reality4 ,= a giv5 bra91 9 int]action ) an ext]nal reality1 !re are a numb] ( features :i* w be describ$ n[4 ,t is1 z a bra9 has _m modes ( int]action ) ext]nal reality1 a p>ticul> bra9 c\ld use mo/ly only "s ( !m1 z foll[s3 ,,sf#a3 ,if !re is a diff]5ce betwe5 reality 7pr$iction7 & ! ext]nal reality 7,,ir71 a bra9 has "s possibilities3 ,,sf#a4a3 to correct ! model bas$ on ,,ir 7k7 ,,sf#a4b3 to modify ! ext]nal reality 7creativity7 ,,sf#a4c3 to /ore ,,ir 9 a /ory-type model ,,sf#a4d3 to ignore or to =get t ,,ir ,,sf#b3 ,:5 a model is correct1 b x _c be integrat$ 9 ! /ructure ( models1 !re are "s possibilities3 ,,sf#b4a3 to make a %ield+ model 7! ext]nal reality is consid]$ z wrong7 ,,sf#b4b3 to modify ! :ole /ructure ( models 7k at any price1 b sometimes ?is c exce$ ! te*nical possibilities ( a giv5 bra974 ,,sf#b4c3 to modify ! model 7i4e4 to di/ort ! importance ( "s elem5ts or relations s t1 ! modifi$ model c be accept$ by ! /ructure74 ,:5 ?is proc$ure is foll[$1 we h a p>anoiac behavior4 ,,sf#b4d3 ! model ) problems is ignor$1 or x is record$ z a /ory-type model4 ,,sf#c3 :5 !re is an ext]nal reality & no suitable model1 !re are "s possibilities3 ,,sf#c4a3 to create a suitable model1 initiat$ by ,,psm ,,sf#c4b3 to ignore t ext]nal reality ,,sf#c4c3 to record t ext]nal reality bas$ on a set ( m or less fragm5t$ /ory-type models4 ,,! ,,p]sonality 7,,human ,,only7 ,! p]sonality is treat$ "h = human be+s only4 ,h[ev]1 "s *>act]i/ics 7:i* are n relat$ 9 a direct or indirect way ) ! symbolic models71 are ab\t ! same = animals4 ,! p]sonality is giv5 by ! :ole /ructure ( models ( a giv5 human be+4 ,we %all develop ?is v complex concept4 ,to d ?is1 at ! beg9n+1 we %all see a numb] ( features 9 a r r&om way & !n1 bas$ on ^! descriptions1 we %all li/ "s important p>amet]s :i* *>act]ize ! p]sonality4 ,we "k f ! g5]al !ory t any bra9 makes models & simulates ! possible evolution ( ^! models4 ,!re are no re/rictions 9 connection ) ! aims or goals ( su* simulations4 ,ev5 = a simple model1 ! numb] ( diff]5t simulations c\ld be high4 ,( c\rse1 a model w n make all ! possible simulations4 ,a *>act]i/ic ( ! p]sonality is associat$ ) ?is div]sity ( aims & goals ( any model4 ,a /ructure ( models c\ld evolve 9 a *aotic way1 out ( control4 ,ano!r p>amet] ( ! p]sonality is associat$ ) ! capability to control su* a div]sity ( evolution ( a /ructure ( models4 ,z we "k f ! g5]al !ory1 ! /ability 9 a model is a bra9 quality p>amet]4 ,?us1 ! aims & goals ( any model h to be controll$ by a limit$ numb] ( long-range models4 ,)\t su* long-range models1 ! /ructure c evolve 9 a *aotic way 7?is is a =m ( s*izophr5ia74 ,fac$ ) a new ext]nal reality1 ! model :i* gives ! be/ pr$ictions ( ! evolution ( t ext]nal reality w be activat$4 ,h[ev]1 :5 ! ext]nal reality is complex1 ! ma9 model has to activate "s o!r models1 to be able to pr$ict bett] & bett] ! evolution ( t ext]nal reality4 ,a p>amet] ( ! p]sonality is ! capacity to keep control ( ! ma9 activity ev5 :5 ! ma9 model activates "s o!rs model4 ,?us1 ! /ability 9 ! ma9 model is a p>amet] associat$ ) ! p]sonality4 ,example3 !re are "s p]sons :o />t f a subject & evolve 9 a r *aotic way to o!r subjects s t ! ma9 subject is sometimes =gott54 ,ano!r p>amet] ( a p]sonality is associat$ ) ! fact t1 al?\gh ! /ructure ( models has to be /able1 ! /ructure mu/ be compatible ) "s models impos$ f outside1 by education4 ,)\t "s ma9 models impos$ f outside 7by education71 a human be+ w be n compatible ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,by education1 "s models mu/ be pres5t 9 any bra9 7"s ( !m mu/ be 9 ! ,,psm74 ,any human be+ is able to integrate into society1 bas$ on !m4 ,!re are n[ v big problems associat$ ) education1 9 ! pres5t human society4 ,! ma9 problem is ! fact t ! society 7includ+ 9 mo/ advanc$ c\ntries7 is evolv+ v fa/ bas$ on symbolic models & ! education is n able to keep ! pace ) ?is fa/ evolution4 ,e4g4 ! usual me?od ( education is to impose "s /ory-type model 7i4e4 "s models ( h[ to d-type74 ,?is me?od has increas$ too mu* ! numb] ( models t mu/ be /or$ by ! bra9 & ! bra9 is n capable anymore to /ore & use all ( !m4 ,bas$ on ,,mdt1 ! normal solution %\ld be to /ore "s normal models t c be tailor$ by ea* p]son to any specific situation4 ,ano!r p>amet] is associat$ ) ! t5d5cy to ?9k & act bas$ on long-range models or %ort-range models4 ,"s p]sons behave bas$ on a numb] ( long-range concept models 7pr9ciples7 :i* are us$ 9 any situation4 ,o!r p]sons h specific %ort-range models = any specific ext]nal reality4 ,! p]sonality p>amet] is typically situat$ betwe5 ! two limits m5tion$ above4 ,f ! g5]al !ory1 we "k t "s models g5]ate k & o!rs are us$ to modify ! ext]nal reality4 ,?us1 !re are p]sonalities ori5t$ mo/ly to k & o!rs are ori5t$ mo/ly to *ange ! ext]nal reality4 ,!re are p]sons :o assimilate easily ext]nal models & o!rs :o pref] to make _! own models4 ,also1 !re are image models & symbolic models4 ,we c make a p>tial matrix associat$ ) a p]sonality bas$ on ! capacity to make_/assimilate image_/symbolic models1 = in/ance4 ,ano!r v important p>amet] is associat$ ) ! cont5t ( ! ,,psm4 ,z we "k1 a numb] ( ext]nal models mu/ be includ$ 9 ! ,,psm1 by ! education process1 s t ! p]son is integrat$ 9 society4 ,un=tunately1 a lot ( models c\ld ent] 9 ,,psm1 9 an uncontroll$ way4 ,"s ( ^! models c\ld be bad models4 ,!y c be built1 e4g4 if a p]son is born & lives 7at lea/ 9 *ildhood7 9 a bad environm5t4 ,= a p]son :o has su* bad models1 !re is /ill a *ance to integrate 9 a normal society1 by mak+ "s %ield+ models4 ,h[ev]1 a %ield+ model is1 usually1 n safe en\gh4 ,?us1 9 "s situations1 a p]son c act bas$ on ! bad models & n bas$ on ! %ield+ models :i* _h help$ him_/h] to be accept$ by ! society4 ,un=tunately1 x is v difficult to "k 9 advance ! cont5t ( ! ,,psm1 because ! ,,psm acts only 9 v special & critical situations4 ,to be und]/ood1 ?is subject ne$s a lot ( fur!r "w4 ,"h we pres5t a g5]al !ory4 ,x _c g beyond "s limits because ! te*nological implem5tation is1 usually1 n tak5 into acc\nt4 ,h[ev]1 bas$ on ! !ory1 x is possible to develop ! subject = specific applications4 ,n[ we %all li/ "s p>amet]s associat$ ) ! p]sonality1 bas$ on ! above discussion4 ,"s ( ! p>amet]s associat$ ) ! p]sonality c\ld be3 ,! ori5tation to image models ,! ori5tation to symbolic models ,! ori5tation to k ,! ori5tation to action on ext]nal reality ,! ori5tation to make new models ,! ori5tation to assimilate new models ,! ori5tation on %ort-range models ,! ori5tation on long-range models ,! p>amet] associat$ ) ! div]sity ( action ,! p>amet] associat$ ) ! /ability 9 a model ,! p>amet] associat$ ) ! con=mity to society requirem5ts ,! p>amet] associat$ ) non-/&>d models f ,,psm ,a table c\ld be made1 = any p]son1 ) num]ical values associat$ to ! above p>amet]s4 ,to d ?is1 a local model mu/ be develop$4 ,t model has to conta9 a set ( /&>d proc$ures to obta9 su* p>amet]s4 ,?is *apt]1 :i* is associat$ ) ! p]sonality1 ref]s only to normal1 mature p]sons 7z ^! t]ms are already def9$74 ,! pa?ological cases are n tak5 into acc\nt "h4 ,9 fact1 to /udy ! pa?ological cases is a nons5se be=e def9+ ! normal situation4 ,?is g5]al !ory1 z x w be develop$ = specific situations1 is useful to und]/& also pa?ological cases4 ,= in/ance1 ,,mdt def9es ,,xzm- models 7illegal models7 z models :i* are n integrat$ 9 ! normal /ructure ( models4 ,su* models c\ld be v important to issues relat$ to ! p]sonality1 b !re are /ill few data ab\t ,,xzm models4 ,!re is ano!r v important p>amet] associat$ ) ! p]sonality1 :i* 0 n describ$ above2 x is a p>amet] associat$ to ! consci\sness4 ,because x is s important1 x w be describ$ 9 a sep>at$ section4 ,,! ,,consci\sness ,x is consid]$ t !re are "s long-range ,,zm models 7image or symbolic71 :i* conta9 ! be+ z an elem5t4 ,:5 su* a model is activat$1 x has to initialize4 ,t is1 x has to f9d ! positions ( all ! elem5ts 7includ+ ! be+ itself7 & to f9d all ! relations betwe5 ! elem5ts by int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,! consci\sness is ! capacity ( a bra9 to make & op]ate a model1 :i* conta9s ! be+ z an elem5t4 ,x is v important to emphasize t su* models are normal models1 :i* are made by t bra9 9 int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,su* models _c be assimilat$ by education1 = in/ance4 ,! level ( consci\sness is associat$ ) ! capacity ( t bra9 to f9d & refre%1 9 a cont9uos way1 ! position ( ! be+ 9 a model4 ,su* models are long-range models4 ,_! elem5ts are already develop$ z models4 ,"s models c also conta9 "s elem5ts associat$ ) ! p]son4 ,! numb] ( planes ( consci\sness c\ld be high4 ,example3 ,i am a ,romanian citiz54 ,i live 9 ,europe1 s ,i am also ,european4 ,i h a job2 ,i h a position !re4 ,i live 9 a block ( flats2 ,i h also a position 9 relation ) ! o!rs :o also live 9 my block ( flats1 & s on4 ,!re are "s models1 :i* does n conta9 ! p]son 9 an explicit way4 ,?is is level-#a ( conci\sness4 ,only "s p>ts ( t p]son are tak5 into acc\nt4 ,! consci\sness is ( level #b :5 ! p]son appe>s 9 an explicit way 9 relation ) o!r p]sons4 ,on level #b1 ! p]son is integrat$ 9 a gr\p2 ! p]son kn[s ! aims & ! rules ( ! gr\p & acts accord+ly4 ,examples3 :5 a p]son dr9ks wat] f a glass1 ! p]son does n appe> 9 an explicit way2 only "s compon5ts ( t p]son are tak5 into acc\nt4 ,if ! p]son kn[s :at he is do+1 & is able to pr$ict 8 evolution1 !n he is on level #a ( consci\sness4 ,if a p]son plays a game 9 a team1 & he kn[s ! aims & ! rules ( ! gr\p & communicates ) ! memb]s ( ! gr\p1 !n t p]son is on level #b ( consci\sness4 ,on level #b1 ! p]son is integrat$ 9 ! model1 z an explicit elem5t1 z any o!r p]son ( t gr\p4 ,problem3 ,on level #b1 a possible problem is to consid] "o's own activity z a good "o1 & to consid] t "s o!r memb]s ( ! gr\p are l[ quality p]sons4 ,?is c\ld happ5 ) a non-homog5\s gr\p1 b also x is possible t ! model is a l[ quality "o 7! p]son has made a l[ quality model associat$ ) ! aims & ! rules ( ! gr\p74 ,z we "k1 any model is made to be /able 7logical or h>monic74 ,we also "k t ! /ability ( a model is n a gu>antee t ! model reflects 9 a good way ! ext]nal reality4 ,?us1 = a good level #b ( consci\sness1 x is necess>y t all ! memb]s ( ! gr\p h ab\t ! same basic model4 ,obs]vation3 x is possible t fac$ ) a new ext]nal reality1 = :i* !re is no available model1 ! ,,psm activates itself4 ,z ! ,,psm is activat$1 all ! normal models are disabl$ & s ! consci\sness disappe>s4 ,su* a situation is call$ %ock /atus4 ,! consci\sness returns only aft] ! normal /ructure ( models rega9s control4 ,! highe/ level ( consci\sness is level #c4 ,!re are few p]sons :o are able to rea* level #c ( consci\sness4 ,x is n easy to und]/& ! explanations associat$ ) ?is level4 ,on level #c1 a p]son is able1 e4g4 to ?9k ) ! o!rs' head4 ,also1 on ?is level1 a p]son is able to see h[ ! o!rs see him4 ,?is implies to make a model :i* conta9s ! model ( ! gr\p z an elem5t 9 a long]- range model4 ,on level #c1 ! bra9 has to "w v h>d4 ,!re are few p]son :o are able to d su* an ef=t4 ,x is h>d] to d su* an ef=t on image models ?an on symbolic models4 ,usually1 level #c ( consci\sness is met on symbolic models4 ,h[ev]1 ! ^w empa?y c be associat$ on image models1 ) a l[ level #c ( consci\sness4 ,note3 ,level #c reque/s a h>d ef=t = a bra9 & at ! same "t1 ! p]sonal advantage f su* ef=t is n too high4 ,?us1 ! absolute majority ( ! population is on level #a & #b4 ,! p]sons able to /ay on level #c are ! elite ( a gr\p4 ,example3 let's see an example involv+ c> driv+4 ,on level #a1 a driv] is react+ only :5 a situation occurs1 or is ab\t to occur4 ,on level #b1 a driv] is able to pr$ict :at ! o!r driv]s w d be=eh&4 ,on level #c1 a driv] is able to und]/& e driv] ar\nd him1 & he is also able to take 9 acc\nt "s possible problems1 :i* c occur 9 association ) ! ov]all traffic problems4 ,( c\rse1 ! be/ driv]s are ^? on level #c1 b ! ef=t to /ay on level #c is s big1 t1 at "s mom5ts1 ! bra9 w n be able to d su* an ef=t1 & ! driv] drops on level #a1 :5 he c cause accid5ts4 ,?is c\ld be ! explanation ( "s inexplicable accid5ts1 ) p]sons :o are consid]$ z v good f a pr(essional po9t ( view4 ,( c\rse1 ?is is a v g5]al problem2 x is n relat$ only ) c> driv]s4 ,we already def9$ ! elite ( a gr\p z ^? p]sons :o are able to /ay on level #c4 ,let's consid] t a p]son has to "w 9 a position :]e "o has to take c>e ( ! community4 ,su* p]sons mu/ anticipate :at problems c\ld occur 9 future1 to be able to protect ! community4 ,level #c is absolutely necess>y4 ,b1 !re is a problem4 ,:5 a p]son is to be select$ = su* a job1 he has to ga9 "s abilities4 ,! problem "h is t su* abilities are1 usually1 obta9$ aft] "s specific tra9+4 ,! tra9+ c\rses h1 z ma9 goal1 to ensure t ! /ud5ts h assimilat$ a numb] ( models4 ,:5 a problem associat$ ) su* models occurs1 !y w activate ! suitable model1 & s !y w solve ! problem4 ,b1 to be able to d ! job 9 a good way1 ! ma9 quality is n to h ! "r model1 :5 ! problem occurs1 b to anticipate fa/ en\gh1 :at k9d ( problem w occur4 ,t is1 to be on level #c4 ,i nev] he>d t ! selection ( p]sonnel is done bas$ also on ! level ( consci\sness crit]ion4 ,ev5 worse1 ! p]sons :o are able to assimilate easily new models1 h a r$uc$ capacity to make _! own models 7z level #c requires7 & s1 ! pres5t sy/em ( education /imulates ! /ud5ts to h a l[ level ( consci\sness4 ,! pres5t level ( developm5t ( ! human bra9 is too l[ to h1 on a l>ge scale1 a level #c ( symbolic consci\sness4 ,! consci\sness bas$ on symbolic models is reque/$ 9 any situation :5 an elite gr\p is necess>y4 ,9 su* a situation1 e individual ( ! gr\p is associat$ ) a symbolic elem5t4 ,su* a symbolic elem5t conta9s no?+ :i* c\ld be associat$ ) ! human "p ( an individual 7no emotions1 no feel+s1 no love & s on74 ,let's see n[ ! consci\sness 9 ! animal _w4 ,"s sup]ior animals1 :i* live 9 packs1 "k _! position 9 ! pack4 ,s1 !re is a =m ( level #b image consci\ness = su* animals4 ,( c\rse1 su* a level is associat$ ) a s+le model1 :i* is made by e individual ( ! pack4 ,ev5 m1 ! position ( e individual c\ld be *ang$ 9 "t4 ,b :at ab\t ants4 ,!re is v little probability t an ant is able to make models 9 int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,! ants are bas$ on ! models ( _! ,,psm1 7:i* are ready made :5 !y are born74 ,= in/ance1 level-#b ( consci\sness c\ld be recogniz$ :5 !re is a competition betwe5 ! memb]s ( ! gr\p1 z x happ5s 9 a pack ( mammals1 or :5 an individual has to be tra9$4 ,su* ?+s _c be met 9 ! _w ( ! ants4 ,?us1 ants h no consci\sness 7except level #j7 z a result ( _! incapacity to make models on _! own4 ,"s sup]ior animals1 :i* live 9 association ) human be+s 7e4g4 dogs71 are able to create on _! own "s models ( int]action ) ! human be+s4 ,s1 !y c\ld h level #b consci\sness4 ,,ab/ract3 ,,model ,,diction>y ,m3 ^! are models associat$ 9 a direct way ) s5se organs 7,m-eyes1 ,m- e>s & s on74 ,,ym3 concept models directly or indirectly associat$ ) diff]5t entities ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,,zm3 ,g5]al long-range models4 ,= any ext]nal reality1 ! bra9 makes "o or m ,,zm-models4 ,!y g5]ate ! tru?s1 ! reality1 ! k & ! consci\sness4 ,,zm-models are activat$ by ! associat$ ext]nal reality4 ,!re are also ,,zm- models t are n associat$ to an ext]nal reality 7e4g4 :5 we solve a problem ( ma!matics74 ,any ,,zm-model associat$ to an ext]nal reality works 9 association ) "s ,m-models1 & also 9 assocition ) any o!r ,,zm-model4 ,,mzm3 ?is t]m is n associat$ ) a model1 b ) a /ructure ( diff]5t ,,zm1 ,,ym1 ,,zam1 & ,,azm models4 ,^! models are v (t5 us$ toge!r4 ,su* a /ructure is g5]at$ by ! te*nological implem5tation ( ! bra91 & x optimizes ! activity ( ! bra9 9 a section ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,,zam3 ^! models are long-range models us$ to modify ! ext]nal reality4 ,!y are artificial models 7!y are n g5]at$ by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality7 & !y are also inv>iant 7!y _c be *ang$ by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality74 ,,azm3 ^! models are associat$ ) ! organs t c int]act ) ! ext]nal reality 7h&s1 legs & s on7 9 a direct way4 ,,xzm3 ^! models are call$ also illegal models1 because !y are n includ$ 9 ! normal /ructure ( models4 ,a normal model is a model = :i* any pr$iction is accept$ 9 a h>monic_/logic way by any o!r model ( ! /ructure4 ,x,z,ms are1 ?us1 individual models :i* h no normal communication ) o!r models4 ,?us1 a bra9 is n able to detect su* models4 ,9 "s situations1 su* models c become active & ga9 control ( ! be+4 ,!y c also transmit "s in=mation to ! normal /ructure ( models4 ,,wbam 7w\ld be-active models73 su* models are artificial models t are g5]at$ by a ,,zm-model4 ,?us1 a ,,zm-model pr$icts a situation = :i* !re is no normal model4 ,if a new ext]nal reality occurs1 & !re is no normal model to und]/& x1 ! ,,psm is activat$4 ,a ,,zm-model c make a ,,wbam- model1 bas$ on its pr$ictions1 s t1 :5 ! new ext]nal reality occurs1 ! ,,zm w activate t ,,wbam & s ,,psm is n activat$4 ,,%ield+ ,,models3 ,any model has ! t5d5cy to become /able4 ,!re are "s models :i* _c become /able4 ,su* models c de/abilize ! :ole /ructure ( models due to "s inf9ite loops p]=m$ 9 ord] to ga9 /ability 7! model ) problems w activate "s o!r models1 includ+ ! ,,psm1 9 a cont9u\s way74 ,a %ield+ model is creat$ by ! ma9 ,,zm4 ,x int]cepts "s tru?s :i* c activate "s o!r models 7incud+ ! ,,psm7 & transmits to ! model ) problems "s in=mation :i* /abilizes x4 ,! reality g5]at$ by a %ield+ model is call$ illusion4 ,! be/ kn[n %ield+-model is religion4 ,?is %ield+ model /abilizes any model :i* pr$icts ! dea? ( ! p]son s x blocks ! activation ( ! ,,psm4 ,,/ory-,,type ,,models3 ,fac$ ) a new ext]nal reality1 ! normal t5d5cy ( ! bra9 is to make a normal model1 or to activate a suitable model f its collection ( models4 ,b1 :5 ! ext]nal reality is *ang+ v fa/1 ?is proc$ure _c be foll[$4 ,9 ?is case1 ! bra9 records ! in=mation bas$ on %ort-range models4 ,^! %ort-range models are connect$ betwe5 !m bas$ on ! ord] ( occur5ce4 ,su* a model 7/r+- type7 is call$ /ory-type model4 ,/ory-type models are us$ lat] 7(f l9e7 to make or improve ! normal models4 ,,protection ,,& ,,survival ,,model 7,,psm7 ,?is is ! fundam5tal image model ( any bra94 ,:5 a new be+ is born1 ! bra9 conta9s only ! ,,psm4 ,! ,,psm conta9s a collection ( basic %ort range models 7e4g4 reflex actions7 & long-range models 7e4g4 ! in/9cts7 = a m9imal protection ( t be+ & to ensure ! unconditional survival ( t be+1 =ev] 7^! are ! basic design features74 ,! ,,psm conta9s also a model ( ! ext]nal body 7bones1 muscles1 & s on7 & also "s basic models ( int]action ) ! ext]nal reality 7e4g4 ! model to foll[ ) ! eyes ! movem5t ( an entity f ext]nal reality1 or ! model to t\* an entity f ext]nal reality1 :i* is 9 ! range ( ! h&74 ,!re are also "s models to ensure ! equilibrium ( ! physical body4 ,fac$ ) a new ext]nal reality1 ! ,,psm is activat$ & x tries to solve ! problem1 bas$ on its %ort-range models 7e4g4 reflex actions71 b x w also create a new elem5t1 :i* is associat$ to ! new ext]nal reality4 ,once ! new elem5t is creat$ by ,,psm1 ?is elem5t is self- develop+ z a model1 9 ord] to und]/& ! new ext]nal reality4 ,:5 su* an ext]nal reality occurs aga91 ! specializ$ model creat$ dur+ ! fir/ occur5ce ( ! new ext]nal reality w be activat$ in/ead ( ! ,,psm4 ,su* models are normal models 7!y d n belong to ,,psm74 ,?us1 z a new born be+ ga9s exp]i5ce1 ! ,,psm w n be activat$1 b ! models previ\sly creat$ 9 ! int]action ( t be+ ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,a model1 :i* belongs to ,,psm1 _c be *ang$ reg>dless ( ! in=mation receiv$ f ext]nal reality 7! ,,psm conta9s only inv>iant models74 ,9 special conditions1 e4g4 :5 a big dang] exi/s = ! be+ 7z detect$ by ,,psm71 x is possible t a new model ent]s ! ,,psm4 ,basically speak+1 any model c ent] ! ,,psm4 ,= a normal bra91 ! ,,psm mu/ conta9 only /&>d models 7see ! g5]al !ory & ,e,t,as7 because1 once a model is 9 ,,psm1 x _c be *ang$ reg>dless ( ! in=mation receiv$ f ext]nal reality4 ,ev5 m1 any in=mation f ext]nal reality c be accept$ only if x c be accept$ by ,,psm4 ,example3 ,let's suppose t 9 ! ,,psm ( a p]son !re is a non-/&>d model :i* consid]s t ! frogs are v dang]\s4 ,reg>dless ( ! in=mation receiv$ f ext]nal reality1 t p]son w be horrifi$ :5 frogs are ar\nd4 ,! cont5t ( ! ,,psm is v h>d to be kn[n because ! ,,psm is activat$ only :5 !re is no normal model to und]/& ! ext]nal reality4 ,! ,,psm is an image model & x w rema9 s =ev]4 ,,examples1 ,,te/s ,,& ,,applications 7,,eta7 ,,associat$ ,,to ,,! ,,mdt ,,!ory ,^! ,e,t,as are int]grant p>ts ( ,,mdt & %[ h[ x works 9 "s specific cases4 ,! ord] ( occur5ce ( ! subjects is r&om4 ,,mdt tries to keep its g5]ality z mu* z possible1 indep5d5t ( ! te*nological implem5tation ( diff]5t bra9s4 ,,eta #a3 ,! ,model ,! model is a collection ( elem5ts & relations betwe5 ! elem5ts4 ,!re are two types ( models3 image models 7or analogic models7 & symbolic models4 ,! elem5ts & relation%ips are giv5 explicitly = ! symbolic models1 & implicitly = ! image models4 ,image models 7analogic7 c't be giv5 9 an explicit mann]4 ,!y are giv5 z !y are1 z a :ole4 ,?is is an intr9sic prop]ty ( ! image models4 ,to give a model 9 an explcit mann] means to describe ! elem5ts & ! relation%ip betwe5 ! elem5ts1 b ?is takes u outside ! analogic model4 ,t means to translate ! image model into a symbolic model 7we ne$ to use words to describe ! image model74 ,ev5 if ! translat$ model is associat$ to ! image model1 x is a diff]5t model4 ,example3 giv5 an image model ( an airplane1 its elem5ts are ! ma9 body1 ! w+s etc4 ,"o ( ! w+s c\ld break 9 two1 s x is made ( two pieces4 ,actually1 x conta9s an inf9ity ( elem5ts1 z x c\ld break 9 any way4 ,9 any real situation1 x is by f> easi] to build an image model1 ?an expla9 :at _h be5 built4 ,?is is :y we say t an image model is j giv5 z x is1 & n def9$ explicitly4 ,anytime we ref] to an image model1 we ne$ to take into acc\nt ?is fundam5tal issue4 ,application #a3 ,image models 9 poetry & pa9t+ ,a poet imag9es some?+- !re is an image model 9 8 m9d4 ,! poet w translate someh[ ?is image model into sev]al symbolic models 7e4g4 /atem5ts71 try+ 9 fact to associate ! image model f 8 m9d to a collection ( symbolic models1 mat]ialis$ 9 ! text ( ! poem4 ,x is assum$ t ! text ( ! poem1 toge!r ) o!r image-type elem5ts 7,ry?m1 rhyme1 intonation etc7 w be able to make ! read]_/li/5] to reassemble someh[ ! initial image model f ! poet's m9d4 ,9 ! case ( pa9t+1 ! pa9t] has 9 front ( him a subject 7e4g4 a p]son74 ,?is subject is p]ceiv$ ?r\gh all ! s5ses ! pa9t] has4 ,:at results is an image model ( ! subject bas$ on ?is complex int]action4 ,?is image model f ! pa9t]'s m9d w be translat$ into ano!r image model t w %[ on ! canvas4 ,! translation means only to associate a model to ano!r4 ,! translat$ model c be built anyh[ )9 v l>ge limits1 bas$ on ! complex image model f ! pa9t]'s m9d4 ,x is suppos$ "h z well1 t ! view] w remake someh[ z an image model ! initial model f ! m9d ( ! pa9t]4 ,application #b3 ,image models f ! ext]nal reality ,long "t ago1 :5 p ne$$ to build "s complex /ructures 7e4g4 a =tress71 9 ! fir/ phase !y _h to make a sket* ( :at !y int5d$ to build4 ,?is is valid only = less complex con/ructions4 ,= m complicat$ /ructures1 ! mo/ us$ me?od 0 to build a #c;,d model4 ,! model c be easily analyz$ & modifi$4 ,) ! model 9 sight1 ! bra9 is able to simulate its behavi\r = situations associat$ ) ! ext]nal reality & to correct ! discov]$ defici5cies1 on ! model4 ,?is model c be us$ at ! effective build+ ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,n[adays1 ! image models are v highly develop$4 ,e4g4 a model built bas$ on complex specs c be us$ to simulate its behavi\r dur+ an e>?quake4 ,! data obta9$ c be us$ to pr$ict ! behavi\r ( ! actual build+4 ,! highly develop$ image models are us$ on l>ge scale 9 te*nology 7skyscrap]s1 susp5sion bridges1 airplanes1 & actually 9 any complex te*nological product74 ,^! image models c !n be us$ to simulate possible situations f ext]nal reality1 includ+ extreme situations1 be=e ! actual con/ruction ( ! te*nological product4 ,! symbolic models are built us+ ,,gcl 7,g5]al ,communication ,language74 ,!y h explicit elem5ts & relation%ips4 ,!y c be built only by humans4 ,! mo/ important symbolic model is ,,gcl itself4 ,its elem5ts are 9 ! fir/ place ! n\ns1 z ! relation%ip betwe5 elem5ts are ma9ly ! v]bs4 ,contra/+ to image models1 :i* evolve bas$ on laws ( h>mony1 symbolic models evolve bas$ on logic 7see g5]al !ory74 ,! pres5ce ( ,,gcl 9 a bra9 w def9e t bra9 z a human bra94 ,important note3 ,,gcl is n really a symbolic model4 ,x conta9s only compon5ts 7elem5ts & relation%ips74 ,:5ev] a symbolic model = communication is built 7e4g4 a s5t5ce71 "o ne$s to *oose compon5ts f ,,gcl4 ,z any use ( ,,gcl is mat]ialis$ 9 a symbolic model & because !re is no prop] ^w = x1 ,,gcl is consid]$ by ext5sion a symbolic model4 ,te*nology uses models on a v l>ge scale4 ,image models h initially be5 us$1 b n[adays1 due to ! high co/s ( ! image models & = o!r reasons1 symbolic models & ! use ( comput]s are fav\r$ 7e4g4 symbolic models are built curr5tly = build+s1 susp5sion bridges1 airplanes & spacecrafts1 ) ! help ( comput]s74 ,= tra9+ purposes1 symbolic models are built & us$ = simulation ( nucle> plants1 or flight behavi\r1 or any?+1 :]e x is necess>y t future crew_//aff to ga9 exp]i5ce be=eh&4 ,pres5t te*nology is bas$ 9 fact almo/ exclusively on symbolic models4 ,application #c3 ,f ! iron to ! space %uttle ,app>5tly an iron is too simple to require a design bas$ on a symbolic model4 ,false4 ,let's take a simple te*nological detail3 ! holes us$ = /eam exhau/s = moi/uris+ ! tissue4 ,"s que/ions are1 e4g4 h[ _m holes x ne$s1 :]e1 :at %ape & dim5sions are ne$$ = uni=m moi/uris+ ( ! tissue ) m9imum wat] consumption & at l[e/ co/s4 ,cle>ly1 x is possible to build analogic models1 :i* c be te/$ exp]im5tally4 ,bas$ on ! analogic 7image7 models "o c obta9 c]ta9 results1 b !re is no gu>antee t ! optimal solution 0 f\nd4 ,! exi/+ image model _c be modifi$1 z su*4 ,if we want to make any *ange 9 ! image model we h to rebuild x f scrat*1 z we already "k1 :i* implies "t & money4 ,! vaporisation & disp]sion process ( ! /eam ?r\gh a complex /ructure z ! surface ( ! iron1 tissue & ! support1 is v complex4 ,physici/s1 bas$ on symbolic models1 ) help ( comput]s1 solve ?is type ( problem4 ,! rebuild+ ( ! model 9 ord] to f9d a bett] solution is f> simpl] on a symbolic model1 ?an on an image model4 ,if 9 ! case ( an iron1 ! highe/ risk is t ! cu/om]s won't buy ! non-p]=m+ iron1 9 o!r cases ! risks involv$ are unacceptable4 ,= in/ance1 ! space %uttle 0 'v]ifi$' = re5t]+ ! atmosph]e on a symbolic model4 ,?is phase ( ! flight1 by f> ! mo/ dang]\s1 w\ld h be5 impossible to te/ be=e ! actual flight4 ,! crew 0 tra9$ on symbolic models 9 all ! phases ( ! flight1 & 9 all normal & exceptional situations4 ,! a/ronauts h le>n$ to fly = re5t]+ ! atmosph]e1 bas$ ma9ly on tra9+ on symbolic models4 ,giv5 a model 7image or symbolic71 x c be us$ to pr$ict its fur!r evolution4 ,?is is a*iev$ by *ang+_/ add+_/ remov+ a p>amet]_/ elem5t_/ relation%ip & foll[+ :at happ5s4 ,?is process is call$ simulation on ! model4 ,z we "k1 ! results ( ! simulation on ! model are call$ tru?s associat$ to ! model4 ,:5 a model is associat$ to ext]nal reality1 by simulat+ on ! model1 we c pr$ict ! evolution ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,^! op]ations are done ei!r by ! human 7image & symbolic7 or ! animal bra9s 7image models only74 ,we ne$ to note "h- x is z important1 z x looks trivial3 ,we ext5d to ! ext]nal reality ! /ructure ( symbolic & image models f our bra94 ,?is ext5sion is done n only 9 ! doma9 ( sci5ce & te*nology1 b also 9 all doma9s ( life4 ,= ea* ( u1 ! _w itself is giv5 z a sum ( all ! projections to ext]nal reality ( all ! active models ( ! bra94 ,?is /atem5t is true = animals z well4 ,example3 ,! laws vot$ 9 ! p>liam5t are long-range symbolic models2 !y are an ext5sion ( ! /ructure ( models f ! bra9s ( ! au?ors ( ! laws4 ,! pr$iction ( ! evolution ( ext]nal reality 7see g5]al !ory7 is ! ma9 requirem5t ( design = ! human or animal bra94 ,?us1 ?is requirem5t is fulfill$ by ! facility ( ! bra9 to build & op]ate models4 ,,eta #b3 ,tru?1 reality1 & communication ,any result ( ! simulation on a model is a tru? associat$ to t model4 ,z po9t$ out 9 ! g5]al !ory1 a tru? is associat$ by u to a symbolic message 7g5]at$ by a symbolic model72 h[ev] 9 ord] to keep ! t]m9ology simple1 9 ! case ( image models1 a result obta9$ by simulation on ! model is also call$ 'tru?'1 9 spite ( ! fact t x is us$ 'z is'1 )\t ! necessity to expla9 x4 ,example3 ,if an animal builds an image model ( ! ext]nal reality1 pr$ict+ a dang]\s situation1 x is possible to f9d ! solution to ! problem by simulation on ! model4 ,?is solution 7! tru?7 might be1 e4g4 to flee4 ,! tru? w activate directly ! preexi/5t action model1 :i* is 9 ?is case to flee4 ,we'll ref] f n[ on only to symbolic models4 ,if no model is specifi$1 any tru? is nons5se4 ,example3 ,! tru? is a c> cra%$ into a wall4 ,?is tru? might be g5]at$ by any ( ! foll[+ models3 -accid5t -te/ -movie_/c>toon -comput] game ,9 any ( ! above models1 ! specifi$ tru? is int]pret$ diff]5tly 7x has a diff]5t mean+74 ,! !ory und]l9es ?us1 t ! model :i* g5]at$ a tru? ne$s to be specifi$ & accept$ be=e ! pres5tation ( ! tru?4 ,?is basic requirem5t is always met 9 positive sci5ces4 ,9 common life1 ! decl>ation ( ! model is n always done1 & (t5 ! model does n ev5 exi/ 9 an elaborate & coh]5t =m4 ,em]g+ f "h a long l9e ( conflicts betwe5 individuals1 gr\ps or cultural zones1 :i* all h _! own reality associat$ to ! same ext]nal reality4 ,?is c be int]pret$ z a design defici5cy ( ! bra94 ,"s c comp5sate ?is h>dw>e defici5cy by s(tw>e1 e4g4 ! individuals situat$ on level #c ( consci\sness 7see ! g5]al !ory74 ,!re is a fairly common situation 9 ext]nal reality :5 a p]son /ates a tru?1 & !n builds ! model to support x4 ,?is happ5s usually = p]sons bas$ on image models only1 & :5 !y int]act ) ext]nal reality1 !y only translate ! image tru? to a symbolic tru?4 ,su* p]sons are recognisable by _! rudim5t>y logic & _! t5d5cy to fragm5t any discussion to p>ticul> sections ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,su* p]sons c't discuss a s+le g5]al subject4 ,ex]cise3 ,v]ify y\rself & o!rs on ! exi/5ce & /atus ( ! model1 :i* g5]at$ any /at$ tru?4 ,x is kn[n f ! g5]al !ory t a basic problem 9 ! con/ruction ( a model associat$ to ! ext]nal reality is t we d n "k be=eh& ! elem5ts ( ! specific ext]nal reality4 ,^! elem5ts ne$ to be discov]$1 & ! discov]$ elem5ts are ! only ones we c op]ate )4 ,w>n+3 ,! ext]nal reality1 z def9$ 9 ,,mdt1 c't h elem5ts & relation%ips4 ,! elem5ts & relations appe> only 9 ! model associat$ to ! ext]nal reality4 ,h[ev]1 9 _m /atem5ts we w use notions l elem5ts & relation%ips ( ! ext]nal reality1 b ^! ne$ to be und]/ood z elem5ts & relations ( ! model associat$ to ! ext]nal reality4 ,= ! ext]nal reality1 "o c use ! t]m 'entity'1 :i* id5tifi$ by ! model w become an elem5t ( x4 ,h[ev]1 we h no ^w available to associate to ext]nal reality 9 ! case ( relations4 ,by p]fection+ ! language1 su* defici5cies w be solv$4 ,a basic requirem5t = ! exi/5ce ( communication is ! exi/5ce ( a s+le common model accept$ by bo? p>ts :o want to communicate4 ,)\t a common symbolic model1 !re is no communication1 z bo? sides w h _! own li/ ( def9ition ( ! t]ms associat$ to ! words4 ,usually1 communication is done only on symbolic models4 ,h[ev]1 !re are m primitive =ms ( communication us+ image models 7betwe5 p1 betwe5 humans & animals1 betwe5 animals74 ,! reality is def9$ 9 ! g5]al !ory z ! sum ( all tru?s g5]at$1 or possibly g5]at$1 by a model4 ,z ea* p]son has 8_/h] own collection ( models1 ! reality z und]/ood by ea* p]son is diff]5t f "o p]son to ano!r4 ,x is important to specify t 9 ! doma9 ( positive sci5ces1 fundam5tal models g5]ally accept$ d exi/4 ,"o ( ^! models is e4g4 ,newton's ,me*anics4 ,z ?is model g5]ates a reality1 all physici/s consid] t ! 'reality' is ! "o g5]at$ by ,newton's ,me*anics1 )9 its limits ( applicability4 ,due to reasons associat$ to confusions ( ! sci5ce ( k1 ! reality g5]at$ by ,newton's model is consid]$ z 'objective'4 ,?us1 objective reality is a t]m g5]at$ by a g5]ally accept$ model 9 specifi$ conditions4 ,f ?is po9t ( view1 ! fact t ! ,sun revolves ar\nd ! ,e>? is an objective tru?1 at lea/ at ! level ( ! ye> #aejj4 ,x ne$s to be /at$ by all means t )\t a model1 ! ext]nal reality _c be p]ceiv$4 ,aft] build+ a model associat$ to ! ext]nal reality1 :at we p]ceive is :at ! model /ates z p]ception4 ,if1 e4g4 we say t 'sn[ is :ite'1 ?is is ! result g5]at$ by a model associat$ ) ext]nal reality1 ext]nal reality :i* conta9s ! elem5t 'sn['4 ,"o ( ! prop]ties ( ! elem5t 'sn[' is t x is :ite4 ,"u ! microscope 7ano!r model7 ! same sn[ looks transp>5t4 ,z we already m5tion$1 reality is ! "o g5]at$ by ! model associat$ to a giv5 ext]nal reality4 ,ea* "t we /ate a tru?1 we h to specify fir/ ! model4 ,example3 ,!re are an ,a & a ,b p]son4 ,a is tall] ?an ,b1 z x results f measurem5t4 ,! t]m 'l5g?' is g5]at$ ( ! model 'space'1 z ,euclid's ,geometry & ,newton's ,me*anics und]/& x4 ,^! fundam5tal models *>act]ize ?is tru? z objective4 ,if we say t ,a is m attractive ?an ,b1 ?is is a subjective tru?4 ,h[ev] a model has also g5]at$ ?is tru?1 m or less elaborate_/ specifi$ & m or less accept$ by diff]5t p]sons4 ,! conclusion is t ! t]m 'subjective tru?' is result+ f a model1 :i* is n unanim\sly accept$ or insuffici5tly elaborat$4 ,9 ?is case1 x is cle> t p %\ld avoid su* tru?s or %\ld decl>e ! model4 ,) ! evolution ( ?9k+1 ! t]m 'subjective tru?' w be remov$ f ! ?9k+ sy/em4 ,,eta #c3 ,fundam5tal problems associat$ to sci5tific k ,comput]s are kn[n z devices us$ to play complex games bas$ on intellig5ce1 to write texts ( diff]5t types1 to make calculations1 to /ore & manage data1 to s5d or receive in=mation1 to build & op]ate symbolic models1 etc4 ,a "q occurs h[ev]3 :i* is ! pr9ciple ( "w ( a comput]8 ,if we d n int]act ) ! comput] via a prim>y programm+ language 7,assembl] or ma*9e language71 ,i believe t x is impossible to f9d ! pr9ciple ( "w ( ! comput] ei!r f 9- or outside ( x4 ,! fundam5tal function ( a comput] is to d logical & ari?metical op]ations ) b9>y numb]s ) ! help ( an electronic device 7regi/]7 call$ 'accumulator'4 ,if we are 9 a text editor1 = in/ance1 & we press a key correspond+ to a lett]1 t lett] w %[ on ! scre54 ,= ! unaw>e1 x is difficult to imag9e t by press+ a key associat$ ) a lett]1 a regi/]-accumulator w make hundr$s or ?\s&s ( logical & ari?metical op]ations on b9>y numb]s1 only to h t lett] %[n on ! scre54 ,?is example wants to illu/rate t1 bas$ on ! ext]nal analysis ( :at is happ5+1 x is impossible to figure out ! pr9ciple ( "w ( a ridicul\sly simple device z a comput] 7ridicul\sly simple comp>$ to ! bra9 ( a dog1 e4g47 ,! me?od us$ 9 positive sci5ces is n ! analysis ( prim>y data4 ,! me?od ( analysis works on extremely simple sy/ems1 :i* c be p]ceiv$ on image models z well4 ,! me?od us$ 9 positive sci5ces is to guess a symbolic model1 bas$ m or less on ! int]action ) ext]nal reality1 & to v]ify ! model4 ,x results t ! me?od ( und]/&+ ! bra9 bas$ on ! analysis ( prim>y data is at lea/ ineffici5t4 ,a fundam5tal problem ( k is t prim>y facts c be und]/ood only if a model to integrate !m already exi/s4 ,)\t a model1 we are =c$ to build "o on ! spot4 ,?us1 ea* fact ( ! ext]nal reality c\ld be und]/ood bas$ on a local model4 ,! correlation betwe5 facts1 ea* und]/ood 9 its local model is impossible4 ,?is is :y a me?od ( guess+ a fundam5tal model 0 impos$4 ,bas$ on ! s+le fundam5tal model ! facts are int]pret$ & re9t]pret$4 ,su* a me?od all[s ! correlation ( ! prim>y facts4 ,if ! model does n make good pr$ictions1 x w be modifi$ & ! process re/>t$ f scrat*1 until we f9d ! model 9 :i* all ! prim>y facts c be und]/ood4 ,! process /ops :5 ! pr$ictions are true ) an acceptable rate4 ,9 t phase we c talk ab\t k4 ,z a comm5t1 we ne$ to say t ! analytical me?od is bas$ on %ort- range models 7c be affect$ by s*izophr5ia & ,,xspc71 :ile ! syn!tic me?od is bas$ on long-range models :i* all[ n only correlation betwe5 facts1 b also a cross-*eck betwe5 ! local models4 ,! ne$ = a s+le fundam5tal model comes f ! fact t any us$ ^w ne$s to h a unique def9ition4 ,?is is true only 9 case ( ! exi/5ce ( a s+le fundam5tal model4 ,example3 :at w\ld happ5 if 9 common language ev]ybody us$ diff]5t def9itions = ! words us$8 ,! communication w\ld n exi/1 ev]yone talk+ 8_/h] own language4 ,! conclusion is t any positive sci5ce is bas$ on a s+le fundam5tal model1 /at$ f ! v />t4 ,?is symbolic model c be bas$ on prim>y facts1 results ( ! int]action ) ext]nal reality or on !oretical pr9ciples 7e4g4 ! pr9ciple ( in]tia 9 ,newton's ,me*anics _c be visibly connect$ by facts se5 9 ! ext]nal reality74 ,h[ev]1 z 9 ! ext]nal reality !re are a huge numb] ( facts difficult to correlate1 ! me?od to f9d ! fundam5tal symbolic model is guess+4 ,once ! model built1 ?is w ord] 9 a univoque mann] all ! prim>y facts4 ,moreov]1 x w make pr$ictions t w lead to new discov]ies or confirmations ( itself4 ,z we h %[n 9 ! g5]al !ory1 we reflect sections ( ! ext]nal reality 9 models4 ,! models make pr$ictions4 ,if ! pr$ictions are good1 we w use ! model a next "t too1 z x prov$ to be useful4 ,n[ we h ! normal answ] to a fundam5tal "q ask$ = long "t3 ':y d ! laws ( nature exi/8' or ',:y ! _w has an ord]8' ,z x results f ,,mdt1 we reflect ! ext]nal reality bas$ on symbolic models4 ,^! symbolic models ne$ to be logical 9 ord] to be /able4 ,if a symbolic model associat$ to ext]nal reality w n reflect x correctly1 we w build a new model4 ,example3 ,! ext]nal reality c *ange due to ! movem5t ( "s objects4 ,!n we w build a symbolic model conta9+ ! t]m 'velocity'4 ,?is symbolic model w make good pr$ictions provid$ ! objects move at a con/ant velocity4 ,if ! velocity is n con/ant1 ! model w n reflect correctly ! ext]nal reality4 ,!n we w build a new symbolic model1 introduc+ a new elem5t call$ 'accel]ation'4 ,?is model w make correct pr$iction = ! objects t move at v>iable velocities z well4 ,?us1 by build+ ( adequate models1 ! ext]nal reality is reflect$ by /able models4 ,x is v easy to confuse ! ext]nal reality ) its 'image' g5]at$ by a /able symbolic model4 ,z we "k1 we h no direct acces to ext]nal reality4 ,we p]ceive x bas$ on "s associat$ models4 ,?us1 z a conclusion1 ! impresion t nature is a /ructure bas$ on /able laws & ord] comes f ! fact t we reflect ! ext]nal reality bas$ on logical & /able symbolic models4 ,,eta #d3 ,g5]al ,communication ,language 7,,gcl71 diction>y ,,gcl is ! fir/ symbolic model g5]at$ by ! human bra94 ,at ! beg9n+1 only its spok5 =m exi/$1 lat] x appe>$ z a writt5 language too4 ,z ! purpose ( ! con/ruction ( models is to pr$ict ! evolution ( ext]nal reality1 ,,gcl 0 always associat$ directly or indirectly ) ext]nal reality4 ,,gcl is a v special symbolic model4 ,x is us$ bo? = g5]al communication & = build+ o!r m precise symbolic models4 ,examples ( develop$ languages includ$ 9 ,,gcl3 diplomatic language1 juridic language1 logical & ma!matical language1 languages bas$ on ge/ures & signs1 comput] languages4 ,,gcl c be us$ to build symbolic models t are associat$ to ext]nal reality1 e4g4 ! positive sci5ces4 ,x is suppos$ t ,,gcl occurs by spontane\s int]action betwe5 p b ?is is an abnormal mode ( occur5ce4 ,x is n cle> to me t a language c />t f scrat*1 b let's suppose s4 ,! abnormal mode ( occur5ce is associat$ ) ano!r aspect4 ,! language = any device us$ to process in=mation 7z ! bra9 is7 is made ( a collection ( t]ms & relations4 ,any elem5t_/relation ( ! symbolic model 7language7 mu/ be associat$ ) a compon5t_/function ( ! h>dw>e4 ,t is1 ! h>dw>e mu/ be kn[n be=e ! language is built4 ,?is is ! normal situation1 e4g4 :5 a comput]1 :i* has no associat$ programs1 has to be us$4 ,b1 z x is believ$1 ! language us$ by ! bra9 appe>$ )\t kn[+ ! h>dw>e4 ,! ma9 consequ5ce is t all ! words1 :i* h to be associat$ ) ! basic feature ( ! h>dw>e1 h no precise def9ition4 ,?us1 we f9d 9 diction>ies :at ,i call ext]nal def9ition ( ! words4 ,t is1 su* def9itions are n bas$ on ! h>dw>e4 ,,mdt z a !ory associat$ ) ! h>dw>e1 g5]ates int]nal def9itions ( ! words4 ,"s su* def9itions w be giv5 bel[4 ,diction>y ( int]nal def9itions = "s words3 #a4 ,to believe3 !re is an incomplete 7un/able7 model4 ,su* a model c\ld become /able 7h>monic_/logic7 if "s artificial elem5ts_/relations are includ$ 7artificial means t some?+ is n g5]at$ by ! int]action ) ! ext]nal reality74 ,aft] su* *anges1 ! model becomes /able4 ,any tru? g5]at$ by su* a model mu/ be associat$ ) ! ^w to believe4 ,also1 ! artificial *anges mu/ be specifi$ be=e4 #b4 ,to "k3 !re is a /able model 7h>monic_/logic7 :i* is integrat$ 9 a /able /ructure ( models4 ,any tru? g5]at$ by su* a model c be associat$ ) to "k4 ,i want to emphasize t f ?is does n result 9 any way t ! tru? is correct1 :5 comp>$ to ! ext]nal reality4 ,to "k means j t ! :ole /ructure ( models ( ! bra9 supports t tru?1 & no?+ m6 ,z "o c see1 to "k is associat$ only to ! /ructure ( models1 & n to ! ext]nal reality4 #c4 ,z ,i "k3 !re are "s models :i* support a tru? b "s o!r relat$ models are n good en\gh to support t tru?4 #d4 ,correct1 to be correct3 ?is t]m has at lea/ two mean+s4 #d;a4 ,!re is a model g5]at+ a pr$iction 9 association ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,?is pr$iction is comp>$ ) ,,ir4 ,if ! result is positive1 !n ! tru? is correct4 #d;b4 ,!re is a /able /ructure ( models4 ,su* a /ructure has already pr$ict$ a l>ge numb] ( correct 7#d;a7 tru?s4 ,9 su* a situation1 any tru? g5]at$ by ! /ructure is consid]$ to be correct 7see also ! def9ition ( ! t]m to "k74 ,to be correct bas$ on def9ition #d;a means to make an exp]im5t 7any comp>ison betwe5 a pr$iction & ,,ir is call$ exp]im5t74 ,!re are a v limit$ situation :5 an exp]im5t c or may be done 7e4g4 if ! problem is to v]ify if a bridge w survive or n 9 case ( an e>?quake1 !n su* a problem _c be solv$ bas$ on an exp]im5t74 ,let's analize n[ a little ! ^w wrong4 ,if a model g5]ates wrong pr$ictions bas$ on ,,ir1 ?is does n mean usually t ! model is wrong4 ,?is ^w is usually associat$ to a model1 :i* is n suitable to a specific ext]nal reality4 ,= in/ance ,newton's ,me*anics is wrong = objects1 :i* travel at a spe$ comp>able ) ! spe$ ( light1 b is correct at l[ spe$4 #e4 ,to und]/&3 !re is an incomplete model & !re is an ,,ir 7f ext]nal reality or f o!r models74 ,! model is selfimprov+ bas$ on t ,,ir4 ,! t]m und]/& is us$ :5 a model is improv$ 9 su* a way4 #f4 ,to imag9e3 is ! ma9 t]m associat$ to any op]ation on image models4 #g4 ,to ?9k3 x is ! ma9 t]m associat$ to any op]ation on symbolic models4 ,= human be+s1 usually1 ! symbolic models are mix$ ) image models b :5 to ?9k is us$1 ! g5]al frame cont9ues to be a symbolic "o4 #h4 ,intellig5ce3 is ! facility to make & op]ate a long-range model4 ,!re is a k9d ( intellig5ce bas$ on image models 7human & animal7 & "o bas$ on symbolic models 7human only74 #i4 ,to repres5t3 !re is a complex model1 :i* is too big to be us$ z a :ole4 ,su* a model c be associat$ to a simplifi$ model1 :i* on its turn is associat$ only to a section ( ! ma9 model4 ,su* a model repres5ts ! ma9 model on ! re/rict$ doma94 ,we %\ld nev] =get t a repres5tation model is bas$ on ! ma9 model1 & ! ma9 model only is fully associat$ to ! ext]nal reality4 #aj4 ,emotion3 ?is is a tempor>y /ate :i* occurs :5 a new ext]nal reality appe>s1 & no suitable %ort-range model is available4 ,emotion is associat$ ,,only to a lack ( a suitable ,,%ort-,,range model4 ,9 su* a situation ! ,,psm is activate4 ,b ! activat$ ,,psm does n consid] ?is ext]nal reality z a dang]\s situation4 ,ev5 s1 x builds a suitable elem5t4 ,su* an elem5t is self-develop+ to und]/& ! new ext]nal reality4 ,! emotion />ts :5 ,,psm is activat$1 & disappe>s :5 a new suitable %ort-range model is activat$4 ,because emotion is associat$ ) ! activation ( ,,psm1 9 an emotional /atus1 ! conci\sness disappe>s or is at lea/ att5uat$4 ,! bra9 c pr$ict ! possiblity t an emotional /atus occurs4 ,sometimes su* /atus c be prev5t$ by a suitable ,,wbam1 built 9 advance4 ,t is1 a ,,zm w build a ,,wbam bas$ on ! available in=mation ab\t a future new ext]nal reality4 ,,zm w activate t ,,wbam :5 ! new ext]nal reality occurs 7see also ! g5]al !ory74 ,we already emphasiz$ t emotions are associat$ to ! lack ( a %ort- range model1 :5 a new ext]nal reality occurs4 ,! ^w angry c be associat$ ) ! lack ( a long-range model associat$ ) a full section ( ! ext]nal reality 7= in/ance :5 a p]son lives 9 an environm5t1 :i* he_/%e doesn't fit 974 ,9 su* a situation1 ! ,,psm is activat$ z well1 b x has no solution4 ,9 fact1 ,,psm c't build a long-range model4 ,a long-range model is difficult to build1 because x />ts f a g5]al model :i* is n directly associat$ to a specifi$ ext]nal reality4 ,! lack ( a suitable long-range model means t _m %ort-range models c become un/able1 due to a lack ( correlation betwe5 !m4 ,su* a p]son has a feel+ t !re is a problem1 b he_/%e _c id5tify x4 ,su* a p]son is 9 an angry-/atus4 ,ab\t ! same consid]ations c be associat$ to ! ^w anxiety4 ,"h we c see a class ( problems associat$ to ! fact t ! words 9 common life are n associat$ to ! h>dw>e & s1 ! ext]nal def9itions are n precise en\gh4 ,z ! language w evolve bas$ on int]nal def9itions1 ! quality ( ! language w improve4 ,,mdt is able to g5]ate a def9ition1 & !n a ^w has to be associat$ to t def9ition4 ,un=tunately1 ! words h already an ext]nal def9ition4 ,?us1 !re are two possibilities3 to inv5t a new ^w1 or to use an already exi/+ ^w4 ,9 ! latt] situation1 two def9itions associat$ to ! same ^w c\ld exi/3 an int]nal "o g5]at$ by ,,mdt1 & an ext]nal "o1 z we c f9d 9 diction>ies4 ,my decision 0 to use z mu* z possible ! already exi/+ words1 ) ! risk to h two diff]5t def9itions associat$ to ! same ^w4 ,z ,,mdt w be accept$1 all ! words associat$ to functions ( ! bra9 w be associat$ only to _! int]nal def9itions4 #aa3 ,to be irritat$1 to be "u /ress ,su* a phrase is us$ :5 !re is a tempor>y situation ( in/ability ( ! /ructure ( models4 ,su* a /atus c affect ! %ort-range models 7to be irritat$7 or ! long-range models 7to be "u /ress74 ,9 ! foll[+1 we w describe "s situations :5 su* a tempor>y in/ability c occur4 #aa;a4 ,!re is a normal model associat$ to ! actual ext]nal reality4 ,! problem occurs :5 su* ext]nal reality evolves 9 a cyclical way1 = v long "t4 ,9 su* a situation1 ! pr$iction ( ! evolution ( ! ext]nal reality is id5tical ) ,,ir1 =ev]4 ,if ! ext]nal reality is a s\nd1 & if ! s\nd conta9s a sequ5ce :i* is repeat$ on & on1 ?is uses a lot ( en]gy ( ! bra9 = a nons5se activity 7due to ! h>dw>e design1 x is impossible n to he> a s\nd74 ,because ! activation ( o!r models becomes difficult1 !re w be an in/ability ( ! /ructure ( models1 & s !re is an irritation-/atus4 ,examples3 ! use z weapon ( ! rattlesnake's rattle & ( ! ,*9ese drop ,x is important to obs]ve two p>amet]s3 ! l5g? ( ! sequ5ce & ! repetition int]val4 ,! musical piece call$ ,bol]o by ,maurice ,ravel conta9s a sequ5ce1 :i* is long en\gh to produce no irritation4 ,9 fact1 e "t :5 ! sequ5ce is repeat$1 !re are o!r musical in/rum5ts4 ,9 ?is way1 ?is musical piece is n too close to ! irritation limit4 ,ev5 s1 at ! end ( ! piece1 ! repeat$ sequ5ce ends1 produc+ an in/ant relaxation4 ,let's see ?is problem 9 ! case ( visual arts4 ,let's suppose a l>ge :ite surface4 ,su* a surface c produce irritation1 because 9 any po9t ( ?is surface1 ! ,,ir is id5tical ) ! pr$iction4 ,!re is a natural t5d5cy to put "s elem5ts on t surface1 to r$uce ! irritation4 ,b1 if ! details are r&omly spread1 ! pr$iction w be diff]5t ( ! ,,ir 9 mo/ ( ! po9ts4 ,?is also c produce "s irritation4 ,! solution f\nd 9 ab\t all cultural zones & times 0 to h "s sequ5ce made ( id5tical elem5ts1 b e elem5t has to be complicat$ en\gh s t sometimes ! ,,ir is id5tical ) ! pr$iction1 & sometimes n4 ,:5 su* a surface is explor$1 ! bra9 seems to h a pleasure4 ,! pleasure c be def9$ z a situation :5 ! pr$iction is close to ,,ir1 b ab\t nev] ! same4 ,?is c be se5 ma9ly on cultural products ( anci5t cultures1 b also n[adays4 ,we c see ?is also on ! %ape ( ! ,*ri/ian cross3 a ,*ri/ian-,or?odox cross has m detail ?an a ,*ri/ian-,ca?olic cross because ! ,or?odox religion is mo/ly ori5t$ to image models :ile ! ,ca?olic religion is m ori5t$ to symbolic models4 ,! mod]n cultural zones are bas$ ma9ly on symbolic models4 ,!re is a r$uc$ t5d5cy to see all ! details 9 a symbolic environm5t4 ,?us a p]fectly plane surface1 )\t details1 w produce no irritation4 ,?is is s because1 9 a symbolic environm5t1 ! int]action bas$ on image models is n important anymore4 #aa;b4 ,! lack ( /ability ( ! /ructure ( models c\ld occur :5 ! ext]nal reality is un*ang+ = a v long "t4 ,"h1 ! pr$iction is also id5tical ) ,,ir1 b !re is an additional te*nological feature1 :i* w be describ$ bel[4 ,z we "k f ! ma9 !ory1 any active model w pr$ict 9 a cont9u\s automatic way ! possible evolution ( ! ext]nal reality 7?is is a basic h>dw>e feature74 ,n[1 ! problem is h[ (t5 ?is pr$iction is made4 ,my supposition is t ! spe$ ( ?is activity is v>iable1 & dep5ds on ! spe$ ( *ang+ ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,t is1 :5 ! ext]nal reality is *ang+ v fa/1 ! new pr$ictions are made also v (t54 ,n[1 if ! ext]nal reality is n *ang+ anymore1 !re c\ld be a problem3 ! model has to make a new pr$iction1 b !re is no reason to d ?is4 ,su* a situation c also produce a tempor>y p]turbation ( ! /ability ( ! /ructure ( models1 i4e4 irritation4 ,9 su* a situation1 ! bra9 c\ld activate o!r ,z,ms1 7e4g4 ,z,ms :i* are n connect$ to ! un*ang+ ext]nal reality7 up to ! mom5t :5 !re w be a *ange 9 ! ma9 ext]nal reality4 ,?is activity c\ld be a s\rce ( mi/akes or ev5 accid5ts1 z ! local-,,zm becomes1 tempor>ily1 "o1 :i* is n connect$ to ! ma9 ext]nal reality4 ,! accid5ts c occur1 = in/ance1 :5 ! ext]nal reality is *ang+ & ! suitable local-,,zm has n en\gh "t to re9itialize4 ,example3 a driv] is 9 a hurry & /ops at a /oplight4 ,! ext]nal reality is n *ang+ = a :ile & s !re c\ld be an irritation4 ,"u /ress conditions1 ! driv] c\ld activate ano!r model 7associat$ or n to ! ext]nal reality7 & s1 he_/%e is n prop]ly prep>$ = ! mom5t :5 ! traffic light *anges to gre54 ,because ?is is an important s\rce ( irritation1 9 "s cities !re is an additional display1 :i* c\nts ! "t = r$ or gre5 /atus1 & s ! irritation is dim9i%$4 ,?us1 "t fl[s ) a v>iable spe$1 dep5d+ on ! spe$ ( *ange ( ! ext]nal reality 7see ,,eta ab\t "t74 #aa;c4 ,! ^w irritation is us$ also :5 an ext]nal factor int]f]es ) ! activity ( a ma9 model4 ,?is ext]nal factor c\ld also activate ! ,,psm4 ,su* a situation c also affect ! /ability ( ! /ructure ( models & s1 produce irritation4 ,z we "k1 fac$ ) a new ext]nal reality 7= in/ance a /rong noise71 ! bra9 w swit* f ! actual-,,zm to ano!r model1 :i* und]/&s ! new situation4 ,:5 su* ext]nal p]turbation occurs on & on1 ! bra9 is =c$ to swit* ! ,z,ms v (t54 ,su* activity c be affect$ by mi/akes1 because swit*+ f a model to ano!r is a v complex activity4 ,:5 a model is deactivat$1 "s in=mation has to be /or$ to be us$ :5 ! model w be reactivat$4 ,sometimes1 ! ext]nal reality c *ange s mu* t ! /or$ in=mation becomes ( no use4 ,b ! bra9 does n "k easily if ! /or$ in=mation is good or n at ! new activation4 ,s1 !re c\ld be mi/akes1 & ! /ability ( ! /ructure ( models c also be affect$ 7irritation occurs74 ,because ! activation & deactivation ( a symbolic model is mu* m complicat$ ?an = an image model1 ! swit*+ betwe5 a symbolic model & an image model1 or ev5 worse1 betwe5 two symbolic models1 is v dang]\s 7don't use ! mobile phone :5 y drive1 e4g47 #ab4 ,love1 to love ,! ma9 model ( any bra9 7human or animal7 is ! ,protection & ,survival ,model 7,,psm74 ,if some?+ 7a p]son1 an animal1 an object1 an idea4447 is includ$ by a p]son 9 8_/h] ,,psm 7z a model1 ( c\rse71 ! relation betwe5 t some?+ & t p]son is a love relation4 ,t is1 e4g4 a p]son ,a includes a p]son ,b 7z model7 9 8_/h] ,,psm4 ,! p]son ,a w treat p]son ,b 9 ! same way z he_/%e treats 8_/h] legs1 h&s1 eyes etc4 ,"h we use ! conv5tion t ,a indicates ! p]son :o is 9 love & ,b is ! p]son includ$ 9 ! ,,psm z a model4 ,! mo/ important love-relation seems to be betwe5 a "m & h] *ildr54 ,z we def9$ ! t]m love ! fact t ,a loves ,b is totally indep5d5t on ! fact t ,b loves ,a4 ,we already describ$ love bas$ on ,,psm4 ,!re is ano!r type ( love1 :i* is n bas$ on ,,psm4 ,?us1 ! p]son ,a makes a /ructure ( models :i* conta9s ,b 9 ab\t all ( !m4 ,if ,b disappe>s1 ! models w\ld become obsolete1 :i* produces a l>ge in/ability ( ! /ructure4 ,! problem c\ld be solv$ by ano!r ,b or by a %ield+ model or by suicide4 ,because love is bas$ ma9ly on image models1 ab\t all ( ! writt5 above is true = animals too4 #ac4 ,happ9ess1 to be happy ,,mdt consid]s t !re are two basic modes ( int]action ( ! bra9 ) ! ext]nal reality3 to g5]ate ! reality bas$ on ! ext]nal reality & to modify ! ext]nal reality4 ,cont9u\s happ9ess is associat$ to ! /atus ( ! bra9 :i* builds action models 7,z,a,ms7 bas$ on ,z,ms-only4 ,t is1 to d & want only :at is possible 7z ,z,ms pr$ict74 ,s any activation ( a ,,zam is a success 7,,zam is able to rea* its aims74 ,! happy p]sons h a big contribution to ! /ability ( ! society1 b small contribution to its advance4 ,we already def9$ ! di%>monic p]son z ! p]son :o builds & activates ,z,a,ms )\t tak+ 9 acc\nt too mu* ! pr$ictions ( ! ,z,ms4 ,usually su* p]sons are unhappy1 b sometimes !y are able to rea* _! aims & s1 at lea/ = a %ort "t1 !y are 9 a /atus ( high level happ9ess4 #ad4 ,intuition ,bas$ on ,,mdt1 intuition is associat$ to ! capacity to obta9 image in=mation 9 a symbolic frame4 ,t is1 :5 we are 9 ! frame ( a symbolic model & !re is a problem )\t a solution1 an image model c be activat$ automatically on its own 7z we already "k74 ,su* image model is able to make a pr$iction b !re is no pro( or reason = x 7because an image model g5]ates image-tru?s674 ,!re is j a feel+ t su* in=mation is true4 ,! symbolic model c use ?is in=mation to solve its problems4 ,9 ?is case1 we speak ab\t intuition4 ,! intuition is simil> to ! extra-s5sorial p]ceptions3 we ga9 "s in=mation )\t any explanation ab\t ! s\rce ( x & !re is no pro( to support x4 ,! diff]5ce is t an illegal model g5]ates ! extra-s5sorial in=mation1 & a normal image model1 :i* is activat$ 9 a normal symbolic frame1 g5]ates ! intuition4 ,note3 ev]y?+ :i* is associat$ to ! consci\sness is g5]at$ by ! local-,,zm4 ,9 ! case ( intuition1 ! ,,zm is a symbolic "o4 ,:5 an image model g5]ates in=mation1 x is j transmitt$ to a symbolic local-,,zm4 ,because ! consci\sness is g5]at$ by ! local-,,zm1 t ,,zm is n able to f9d ! s\rce ( ! in=mation1 & ! pro( = x because x 0 n g5]at$ by ! ,,zm or by any normal model4 #ae4 ,consci\sness ,! consci\sness is associat$ to ! facility ( a bra9 to make & op]ate a model1 :i* conta9s ! be+ itself z an elem5t4 ,two types ( consci\sness exi/3 image consci\sness & symbolic consci\sness4 ,! absolute majority ( ! population has only image consci\sness4 ,also1 on animal level1 at lea/ ! mammals h "s level ( image consci\sness4 ,level-#a ( consci\sness3 on ?is level1 ! be+ is able to pr$ict ! evolution ( ! ext]nal reality1 bas$ also on its activity 9 t ext]nal reality4 ,?is facility ensures ! success ( ! def5se or attack activities 9 int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,level-#a consci\sness is g5]at$ by %ort-range models4 ,level-#b ( consci\sness3 ?is level occurs only 9 a gr\p 7"s packs ( mammals1 any human gr\p44474 ,to be accept$ by t gr\p1 any be+ mu/ assimilate & op]ate a long-range model associat$ to t gr\p4 ,su* be+s mu/ communicate ) "o ano!r to meet ! above requirem5ts4 ,= humans only1 long-range models g5]ate ! rules1 ! laws1 ! me?ods & ! aims ( ! gr\p4 ,level-#c ( conci\sness3 on ?is level1 a human be+ is able to pr$ict ! evolution ( ! gr\p1 bas$ on a model :i* conta9s ! gr\p z an elem5t1 :ile he is a memb] ( t gr\p4 ,! app>t55ce to ! gr\p is a basic condition "h4 ,!re are few p]sons1 :i* are able to rea* ?is level4 ,! ef=t ( ! bra9 to /ay on level-#c is huge4 ,! p]sons :o are able to /ay on level #c are ! elite ( ! gr\p4 ,!re are few direct p]sonal advantages f be+ on level-#c1 b )\t an elite1 ! gr\p is a l[ quality gr\p4 ,! advance ( a society is giv5 by ! p[] giv5 to ! actual elite4 ,x is important to note t !re are "s positions 9 a society1 :i* mu/ belong to ! elite4 ,_m times su* positions are occupi$ by level-#b p]sons4 ,?is happ5s usually 9 a l[ quality gr\p or society4 ,,eta #e3 ,,null model ,let's consid] t an ,m-model transmits no in=mation 7e4g4 our eyes are clos$74 ,a local-,,zm takes ! in=mation f t ,m-model4 ,because ! ,m- model transmits no in=mation1 ! ,,zm mu/ receive no in=mation4 ,:at is really receiv$ is call$ ,,null-model4 ,= a normal bra91 9 ! above condition1 ! local-,,zm mu/ receive a completely d>k surface4 ,:at is really receiv$ is an indication ab\t ! ov]all /atus ( ! bra94 ,= in/ance1 9 ! above conditions1 we c receive a d>k surface ) "s r&omly mov+ po9ts4 ,t is1 ! local-,,zm detects a bright po9t 9 a place1 b at ! second scan ! po9t is n !re anymore4 ,?is means t !re is a noise1 b no important h>dw>e problems4 ,a /able image is g5]at$ by a h>dw>e problem ( ,m or ,,zm models4 ,application3 ,9 ! fir/ seconds aft] wake up1 ) clos$ eyes1 look t[>ds a mod]ately bright surface4 ,usually1 "o %\ld p]ceive a d>k surface full ( grey po9ts mov+ r&omly4 ,aft] a few seconds1 ! surface becomes a uni=m d>k-grey "o4 ,?is is a typical situation = a bra9 9 a normal /atus4 ,x is also possible1 9 ! fir/ mom5ts1 to see big bright po9ts or %apes1 mov+ r&omly4 ,!y evolve to d>k & small grey po9ts1 & !n to a uni=m grey surface4 ,9 su* a situation1 ! bra9 is n 9 a good %ape 7maybe ! p]son did n sleep en\gh4447 ,anyways1 if ! f9al /atus ( ! ,,null model is a uni=m grey surface1 ! bra9 is ,,ok4 ,?is case has be5 illu/rat$ = ! eyes1 b ,,null models exi/ = all s5ses4 ,,eta #f3 ,"t ,except+ :5 specifi$ o!rwise1 ! subject is ! same = human & animal be+s4 ,bas$ on ,,mdt1 "t is n a p>amet] = ! functions ( ! bra94 ,?is is a basic defici5cy4 ,b !re is a problem3 z ! bra9 pr$icts on & on ! evolution ( ! ext]nal reality1 h[ (t5 is ?is activity done8 ,( c\rse1 ?is problem is associat$ to ! te*nological implem5tation ( e type ( bra91 s x is outside ! field cov]$ by ,,mdt4 ,ev5 s1 bas$ on ,,mdt1 we c make "s assumptions4 ,because ! bra9 is an optimiz$ device z to its en]gy consumption1 we assume t ! pr$ictions ab\t ! evolution ( ! ext]nal reality are done at a spe$ :i* dep5ds on ! *ang+ spe$ ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,t is1 ! bra9 "t fl[s ) v>iable spe$4 ,?is is also our feel+ bas$ on our own exp]i5ce4 ,= in/ance1 :5 we are involv$ 9 a complex activity1 "t seems to fl[ too fa/ & :5 we h no?+ to d1 "t seems to fl[ v sl[ly4 ,?is is a big design drawback4 ,)\t "t1 ! long-range models c\ld be ineffici5t or unusable4 ,s1 ! bra9 is =c$ to comp5sate1 someh[1 ?is drawback4 ,"o me?od is to use /ory-type models4 ,!y are n able to keep ! control ( "t1 b !y are able to record ! ord] ( occur5ce ( "s in=mation4 ,ev5 s1 ?is me?od is n v effici5t4 ,a /ory-type model c\ld fragm5t4 ,once x is fragm5t$1 ! correlation betwe5 ! prim>y in=mation is lo/4 ,note3 :5 a /ory-type model is fragm5t$1 !re is ! t5d5cy to reconnect ! fragm5ts1 bas$ on logic4 ,_m times ?is recon/ruction is wrong1 b ! impression c\ld be good4 ,! fragm5tation ( ! /ory-type models c be se5 :5 a p]son describes a complex situation4 ,dur+ ?is activity1 "o c\ld *ange ! ord] ( "s facts4 ,ano!r me?od1 us$ by ! bra9 to keep track ( "t1 is to use "s rhy?m-models4 ,su* models are specializ$ models1 :i* try to guess :5 some?+ w happ51 bas$ on :at has already happ5$ be=e4 ,= in/ance1 if ! bra9 receives a sequ5ce ( two s\nds1 a rhy?m model tries to guess :5 a ?ird s\nd w occur4 ,! supposition is t su* models try to f9d an algori?m1 :i* w g5]ate ! sequ5ce4 ,su* algori?m mu/ be *ang$ on & on1 9 a fa/ dynamical way1 to pr$ict bett] & bett] :5 ! next s\nd w occur4 ,su* rhy?m-models c be us$1 e4g4 to recognize ! spee* or to und]/& music4 ,! rhy?m-models are n able ei!r to solve ! "t problem1 b !y are able to solve "s "t-relat$ problems associat$ to fa/ *ang+ ext]nal reality 9 ! field ( s\nds4 ,let's analyze a bit ?is problem4 ,fir/ ( all1 ! rhy?m-models are v well develop$ = human be+s1 & !y are ( v l[ quality = animals4 ,"o assumption w\ld be t1 comp>$ to animals1 ! human bra9 has a v high capacity to make & op]ate image models1 &1 due to ?is1 ! rhy?m- models are s good4 ,b1 !re are "s o!r facts3 ! ,european civilization inv5t$ ! polyphonic music 7! mo/ advanc$ music74 ,b ! ,european civilization is develop+ bas$ on symbolic models4 ,x is fair to suppose t symbolic models support ! rhy?m image-models4 ,we c take into acc\nt ano!r idea z well3 z ,,mdt consid]s t ! capacity to make & op]ate symbolic models is g5]at$ by a specializ$ h>dw>e 7?us x _c be produc$ by a normal evolution process71 x is possible t ! capacity to make & op]ate rhy?m models 0 add$ 9 ! same way4 ,?is supposition is support$ by ! fact t1 :ile "s animals are able to make & op]ate "s image models above ! level ( human be+s1 _! capacity to make rhy?m models is unusually l[4 ,! problem ( ! orig9 ( ! rhy?m models is left op5 = ! mom5t4 ,ano!r me?od to comp5sate = ! "t keep+ defici5cy is to record "s patt]n-models ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,t is1 to record "s in=mation bas$ on _m ,m-type models1 to build a patt]n-model at a specific mom5t ( "t1 & to recognize ! patt]n lat]4 ,su* a patt]n c\ld be associat$ ) ! function ( diff]5t organs ( ! be+1 or ) "s o!r in=mation f outside ! be+4 ,! "t problem is a big "o = ! bra94 ,! bra9 w use any ext]nal ref]5ce to keep ! "t z ! day_/night cycle1 ! movem5t ( ! sun & moon & = humans only1 clocks4 ,,eta #g3 ,music ,music is a long-range image model1 :i* exi/s only = human be+s4 ,z a newborn baby gr[s1 fir/ly1 spee* appe>s 7a symbolic model7 & only lat]1 ! qualities associat$ to und]/&+ music4 ,z music und]/&+ capabilities appe> aft] ! bra9 aquires ! ability to build & op]ate symbolic models1 x is reasonable to suppose t ! symbolic models support ! developm5t ( music4 ,?is idea is support$ also by ! fact t ,european music 7! mo/ advanc$ 9 ! con/ruction ( symbolic models7 is sup]ior comp>$ to any o!r music f ! po9t ( view ( its complexity 7polyphonic music 0 inv5t$ 9 ,europe74 ,giv5 a sequ5ce ( a few s\nds1 ! bra9 w try to pr$ict ! occur5ce ( ! next s\nds4 ,sometimes ! pr$iction is correct sometimes n4 ,if ! pr$iction is good too (t51 ! impression is describ$ 9 words l3 bor+1 monoton\s or upsett+4 ,:5 ! pr$iction is n correct7!re is a l>ge discrepancy betwe5 ! pr$iction & ,,ir71 ! s\nds are uncorellat$4 ,if we h an acceptable diff]5ce 7! s\nds are consid]$ corellat$ aft] modify+ slightly ! algori?m ( g5]ation ( ! sequ5ce71 !n we c associate ?is to music4 ,! corellation is associat$ ) ! capacity ( g5]ation ( a sequ5ce bas$ on an algori?m4 ,?is automatic activity ( cont9u\s modify+ ! g5]ation algori?m c produce a positive /ate ( m9d1 :i* c be call$ pleasure4 ,?is means t ! pr$ictions are correct con/antly1 ) high probability1 & t ! ones1 :i* are n correct1 are accept$1 aft] an acceptable *ange ( ! algori?m4 ,?is activity is call$ curr5tly music4 ,! corellation c be support$ implicitly1 z x happ5s 9 classical music or c be support$ explicitly 7e4 g4 by rhy?m ( drums74 ,if we accept ! hypo!sis ( ! exi/5ce ( a facility associat$ ) image models 7a h>dw>e facility7 to build an algori?m ( g5]ation ( corellat$ in=mation1 !n we c\ld try to see if ?is facilty evolv$ 9 "t or n4 ,?us1 9 spite ( ! fact t ! capacity ( ! bra9 to op]ate ) image models dim9i%es relatively 9 "t1 ! developm5t ( ! capacity to op]ate ) symbolic models g5]at$ new abilities ( op]ation ) image models4 ,9 consequ5ce1 music evolves bas$ on two some:at contr>y t5d5cies4 ,! capacity to build & op]ate image models decreases due to ! increase ( ! capacity to op]ate symbolic model1 &1 on ! o!r h&1 ! symbolic models support ! image models 9 ! doma9 ( music4 ,! symbolic models1 :i* 7 develop$ especially 9 ,europe1 det]m9$ ! high level ( complexity ( ! music4 ,! ,european polyphonic music is "o ( ! results ( ! m>riage betwe5 image & symbolic models 9 music4 ,o!r civilisations1 :i* did n h an ext5sive developm5t bas$ on symbolic models1 h creat$ 9 mill5iums ( evolution only a simple music4 ,let's see 9 ! foll[+ "s elem5ts ( ! evolution ( music 9 ,europe4 ,! symbolic 'recipes' appe>$ 9 music composition 9 ! "t ( ,j4,s4 ,ba*4 ,! maximum complexity ( ! music 0 atta9$ dur+ ! times ( ,w4,a4 ,moz>t4 ,9 t p]iod1 ! music _h sev]al simultane\s musical l9es1 :i*1 accord+ to possibilities1 7 foll[$ by ^? :o 7 able to d x4 ,e4g4 9 ! ,great ,messa1 ,,kv #dbg by ,moz>t1 sev]al musical planes exi/1 :i* h to be foll[$ simultane\sly4 ,ev5 n[adays1 j ! record+ ( ?is "w poses te*nical problems4 ,?is musical "w is "o ( ! peak complexity con/ructions 9 music4 ,approximately aft] ye> #ahjj1 due to ! increas$ capacity to op]ate ) symbolic models1 ! capacity to op]ate image models decreas$4 ,music cont9u$ to be polyphonic1 b became simpl]1 ) a s+le melodic l9e 7,l4 van ,bee?ov51 contempor>y ) ,moz>t74 ,?is simplifi$ music 0 call$ romantic music1 & 0 a =m ( fundam5talism4 ,! majority ( ! population lo/ _! capacity to op]ate v complex image models1 & s1 su* a simplifi$ music 0 g5]at$4 ,?is t5d5cy cont9u$ ) ! increase ( ! limits ( pr$ictions acceptability1 due ! increase ( ! capability ( con/ruction & op]ation ) symbolic models4 ,e4g4 ! music compos$ by ,igor ,/rav9sky4 ,:5 8 music appe>$1 x 0 reject$ due to surpass+ ! limits ( acceptability4 ,b1 9 a %ort "t1 o!r musicians & p accept$ 8 music1 z a consequ5ce ( ! increase ( ! acceptability limits4 ,x is rem9d$ t ! increase ( ! acceptability limits is due to ! increase ( ! capacity to build g5]ation algori?ms4 ,an assumption is t ^! algori?ms are support$ by symbolic models4 ,n[adays1 music is s advanc$ t x conta9s j a rudim5t>y rhy?m1 & an endless text 7hip-hop or rap music e4g474 ,! *ildr5 ( our times h a r$uc$ capacity to und]/& music4 ,ar\nd ! ye> #ahjj1 "s #d ye>s old *ildr5 7 able to play ! piano or viol91 or ev5 to compose music4 ,9 our days1 ?is is n met anymore4 ,b1 "s *ildr5 are able to build & op]ate comput]-bas$ symbolic models4 ,z x is %[n also1 9 "s o!r p>ts ( ! book1 !re is a new =m ( fundam5talism n[adays3 ! rejection ( ! symbolic models by a fraction ( ! population4 ,t is1 "s p return to h>mony 7!re are _m :o pref] ,moz>t e4g474 ,! pres5t music is balanc+ betwe5 symbolic-type music 7hip-hop or rap e4g47 & h>monic music4 ,?is t5d5cy w cont9ue = a long "t1 because x is h>d to believe t music w disappe> 7! bra9 is bas$ on image models =ev]71 b return+ to ! ye> #ahjj type h>mony is n possible anymore4 ,music is def9$ z a special /ory-type model associat$ ) s\nds4 ,?is /ory-type model has elem5ts g5]at$ by an algori?m g5]ator4 ,! g5]at+ algori?m is able to build 9 a dynamically way ! elem5ts :i* w be record$ by ?is special type /ory-type model4 ,bas$ on ! algori?m1 ! model is able to pr$ict ! future s\nds bas$ on ! s\nds already receiv$4 ,sometimes ! algori?m g5]ator is able to make a correct pr$iction ( ! s\nd :i* comes 7a hit71 sometimes n 7a miss74 ,if ! pr$iction fails1 !n ! g5]ator w modify ! algori?m & cont9ue to pr$ict :at foll[s4 ,:5 ! numb] ( misses is l[1 ?is c\ld produce pleasure to ! bra94 ,:5 ! numb] ( misses is z]o1 !re is no pleasure 7e4g4 a bor+ music74 ,:5 ! numb] ( hits is z]o1 !re is no music 7no correlation betwe5 ! s\nds74 ,z ?is special /ory-type model is an image-model1 its p[] is decreas+ z ! bra9 is evolv+ to symbolic models4 ,on ! o!r h&1 x seems t ! symbolic models support ! algori?m g5]ator4 ,t is1 !re are two t5d5cies t act 9 contr>y directions4 ,"o t5d5cy is to make a simplifi$ music1 bas$ ma9ly on symbolic models 7texts7 9 ! frame ( a rudim5t>y rhy?m 7e4g4 drums71 z hip-hop & rap music & on ! o!r h&1 to make music bas$ on complex algori?ms 7to enl>ge ! limits ( acceptability74 ,! pres5t music is evolv+ betwe5 ^! two l>ge limits4 ,! ma9 t5d5cies ( ! pres5t music are3 - ,! evolution bas$ on symbolic models4 ,?is t5d5cy increases ! limits ( acceptability ( :at are & :at are n correlat$ s\nds4 - ,! rejection ( ! symbolic models by a fraction ( ! population1 i4e4 p want h>monic music4 - ,! return to h>mony is possible only p>tially because _m abilities associat$ ) ! ma9 /ory-type model are lo/1 due to ! g5]al t5d5cy ( conceptualization ( ! image models4 ,t is1 ! algori?m g5]ator is bett] & bett]1 b x acts on record$ data1 :i* are a simplifi$ copy ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,let's see :at is ! situation ) o!r arts4 ,almo/ all classical arts are 9 decl9e4 ,pa9t+ & sculpture are bas$ on pure image models4 ,! g5]al t5d5cy is to make concept models1 & s p are n able anymore to p]ceive f9e details4 ,?is t5d5cy is v easily se5 9 contempor>y arts4 ,! t5d5cy 9 visual arts is to make works bas$ on symbolic models1 & to increase ! complexity4 ,"s arts z poetry1 pa9t+ & sculpture are on ! way to disappe>ance z /&-alone arts4 ,!atre1 because x is bas$ on symbolic models1 is surviv+1 z x tries to keep ! contact ) ! t5d5cies ( ! society4 ,music is /ill 9 a good %ape1 z we already saw4 ,! ma9 asc5d+ art is c9ematography4 ,,eta #h3 ,c9ematography ,let's make a symbolic model to und]/& ! subject z foll[s3 - ,! importance ( ! symbolic models 7?9k+ e4g47 increases - ,a big fraction ( ! population has difficulties to evolve bas$ on symbolic models 7fundam5talism7 - ,fundam5talism means to return to image models - ,?is return is possible only p>tially4 ,because return+ to image models affects an important fraction ( ! population1 :y is x n se5 9 pa9t+ & sculpture8 ,! explanation is t ! bra9 has lo/ a lot ( its capacity to make & op]ate pure image models4 ,! bra9 returns to image models1 b x /ops at ! level ( concept models4 ,c9ematography is "o ( ! responses suitable to ?is situation4 ,?us1 !re are c>toons1 bas$ on concept image models4 ,!y are /rongly atta*$ to symbolic models4 ,!re are c>toons1 9 :i* symbolic models are m important ?an ! concept image models4 ,today's successful movies are image models1 :i* try to develop & ext5d "s ( ! incipi5t image models preexi/+ 9 ! m9d ( ! view]4 ,we rem9d "h t p h ! t5d5cy to exp& _! /ructure ( models outside _! m9d4 ,:5 ! models c't be exp&$ to ! ext]nal reality1 !re is ! t5d5cy to exp& ^! models into a virtual reality4 ,?is is speculat$ by c9ematography1 dep5d+ on ! pr(ile ( image models 9 diff]5t cultural zones4 ,f ?is po9t ( view1 movies c be v dang]\s4 ,!y make ^! developm5ts bas$ on :at p w\ld l to happ5 & on ! o!r h&1 !y favorize ! fundam5tal t5d5cies ( v>i\s social gr\ps4 ,h[ev]1 z !y are atta*$ to symbolic models1 "s movies are us$ to develop symbolic models & fight fundam5tali/ t5d5cies & z su*1 h a positive impact on society4 ,a huge dang] associat$ to art movies is block+ ! capacity ( p to ?9k indep5d5tly 7t5d5cy t[>ds induc$ s*izophr5ia ,,xs#a;,b74 ,ea* script is a long-range symbolic model2 ?us1 ! movie z a :ole is logical4 ,?is long-range symbolic model is translat$ or associat$ to a long-range image model4 ,if ! translation is correct1 ! image model w be h>monic z well4 ,?us1 an art movie is a logical & h>monical long-range image model4 ,! fundam5tal problem is t x is n en\gh = a model to be logical & h>monical 9 ord] = x to h a good connection ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,!re are movies t try to recon/ruct an ext]nal reality t no long] exi/s1 an 'ext]nal reality' :i* w nev] exi/1 or any?+ else 9 betwe5 ^! v broad limits4 ,! only condition is t ! model is h>monic & logical4 ,we _c see ! degree ( connection ) ext]nal reality f )9 ! model4 ,?is is :]e ! dang] orig9ates4 ,indep5d5t ?9k+ w be block$ by ! l>ge quantity ( in=mation /ructur$ h>monically & logically4 ,_m art films contribute l>gely to ! aggravation ( ! level ( induc$ s*izophr5ia 7,,xs#a;,b74 ,at ! same "t1 !re are _m movies :i* contribute to ! con/ruction ( long-range models t /abilize society4 ,,eta #i3 ,! fundam5talisms ( ! _w we live 9 ,! ma9 fundam5talism is ! return to image models1 & ?us1 ! refusal ( symbolic models4 ,symbolic models are bas$ on extremely complex functions1 :i* are n easily ma9ta9$ op]ational4 ,= a 'regul>' bra91 ! en]gy consumption is high] = symbolic models ?an = image models4 ,h[ev]1 !re is a fraction ( ! population ( develop$ c\ntries work+ m easily ) symbolic models ?an ) image models4 ,example3 ,!re 0 a "t 9 ! evolution ( ! bra91 :5 extremely complex image models 7 built & translat$ to a symbolic =m4 ,x 0 ! "t ( ! great novels 7,balzac1 ,do/oievski etc474 ,read+ su* works 0 a sign ( cultural sup]iority4 ,^! books are n read n[adays4 ,! ma9 reason is ! evolution t[>ds symbolic models4 ,! ef=t ( ! bra9 to und]/& & integrate ! use ( remote controls1 cellphones or text editors is p]fectly comp>able z intellectual ef=t ) ! und]/&+ ( ! great works ( univ]sal lit]ature4 ,!re are too _m :o h difficulties to op]ate symbolic models4 ,!re is a fraction ( ! population :o refuses symbolic models2 ?is fraction seems to be increas+4 ,example3 ,microprocessors 7! c5tral "p ( a comput]7 h be5 inv5t$ 9 ,,usa4 ,at t "t !re 0 a t5d5cy all ov] ! _w to produce or reproduce su* microprocessors4 ,! fir/ microprocessor 0 call$ #hjhj4 ,x 0 upgrad$ to #hjbhf4 ,^! microprocessors 7 reproduc$ 9 ,europe1 =m] ,,ussr & ,japan4 #hjchf foll[$1 :i* 0 reproduc$ ) great difficulties1 b />t+ ) #hjdhf ! t5d5cy to reproduce su* devices 0 extremely l[4 ,pres5tly !re are two families ( microprocessors1 bo? design$ & produc$ 9 ,,usa4 ,?is is int]pret$ by ,,mdt z a dang] ( a break betwe5 ! mo/ advanc$ 9 ! doma9 ( symbolic models1 & ! slighly less advanc$ ones 7make y\r own comp>ison ) ! automobile indu/ry74 ,ev5 ! advanc$ cultural zones 7,europe1 ,russia1 ,japan7 make big ef=ts to keep ! contact ) ! mo/ advanc$ 7,,usa71 b ! dang] ( a break exi/s "h z well4 ,! fundam5tali/ reactions ( ! individuals1 nations or ev5 cultural zones are a great dang] = human civilisation4 ,if ! fraction ( fundam5tali/s w increase too mu*1 !n1 at ! limit1 two ?+s might happ53 #a4 ,! _w w fragm5t into nations_/ cultural regions :i* c ma9ta9 ! rhy?m ( assimilation & developm5t ( symbolic models1 & nations_/cultural regions :i* w return to image models 7fundam5tali/ reaction7 #b4 ,! same type ( break w appe> inside a nation_/ cultural region4 ,! evolution %[n at no4#a1 pu%$ to extreme1 c\ld g5]ate t]rorism1 & ! "o at #b already g5]ates 'escape' movem5ts t[>ds religions1 antiglobalisation1 ecology etc4 ,,eta #aj3 ,t]rorism ,! evolution ( society leads1 = "s nations1 to an incapacity ( fur!r developm5t bas$ on symbolic models4 ,^! nations feel t ! _w is go+ t[>ds some?+ !y c't foll[ & und]/&4 ,! solution = !m is to adh]e to an inv>iant or univ]sally accept$ model1 l a religion or a nature_/tradition cons]vation movem5t1 to ori5t _! activity1 & to (f] !m an easily und]/&able & atta9able goal 9 pr$ictible "t 7fundam5tali/ reaction74 ,"s individuals1 :o h /rong fundam5tali/ reactions1 c\ld try to modify ! society by direct action4 ,a class ( su* reactions is t]rorism4 ,! def9ition = t]rorism consid]$ "h is3 t]rorism is an antisocial ph5om5on1 :i* implies attack+ "s p]sons )\t an explicit reason4 ,x also means de/ruction ( mat]ial goods )\t explicit reasons1 :5 ^! goods d n belong to a /ate4 ,if ! p]sons attack$ are ! repres5tatives ( a gov]nm5t & ! goods attack$ belong to ! gov]nm5t1 !n we h acts ( w>4 ,a /ate c def5d itself f acts ( w>1 b 9 front ( a t]ror attack1 ! protection (f]$ by ! /ate is limit$4 ,! ma9 reason is t ! gov]nm5t (ficials accept ! limitation ( _! rights1 & !y accept a c]ta9 discipl9e4 ,^! p]sons are well en\gh in=m$ to und]/& t !y c\ld be ! t>gets ( an attack4 ,! same is valid fo def5d+ ! goods belong+ to a /ate4 ,_m t]rori/ movem5ts h tri$ to commit w> acts & n t]ror acts4 ,?us1 !y try to obta9 a legitimity z lib]ation movem5ts1 :o fight = lib]ty or indep5d5ce aga9/ a /ate4 ,example3 ,,eta 9 ,spa9 tries to attack only ! repres5tatives ( ! /ate or local adm9i/ration1 & ! goods belong+ to !m4 ,x is difficult h[ev] = ,,eta to comply ) ^! rules1 all ( ! "t4 ,,ira acts ! same way1 try+ to delimit itself f t]rorism4 ,bo? movem5ts make notable ef=ts to be consid]$ lib]ation movem5ts at w> ) an opressive /ate1 & n t]rori/ movem5ts4 ,al ,quaida tri$ at "s "t to attack only ,am]ican milit>y t>gets 7?us delimit+ itself f t]rorism71 b ! attack on ,,wtc 9 ,new ,york is cle>ly a t]ror act4 ,! p kill$ 7 n repres5tatives ( ! /ate1 ! planes us$ 7 n milit>y1 & ! build+s did n belong to ! /ate74 ,h[ev] ! attack on ! ,p5tagon 0 n a t]ror act1 b a w> act4 ,a practical aspect %\ld be not$ connect$ to ! t5d5cies ( t]rorism3 :o has vocation to build1 has no 'vocation' = t]rorism4 ,to build planes1 build+s & s _m o!r mat]ial goods supposes an imm5se ef=t on sci5tific & te*nological levels1 9 lab\r organisation1 on ! social & cultural level4 ,^? :o "k h[ difficult ^! ?+s are done1 & h[ _m causes c block easily ?is process1 w n h ! t5d5cy to de/roy mat]ial goods4 ,we *ange n[ ! discussion & w ref] to ! individual t]rori/s exi/+ 9 any society4 ,s]ial kill]s exi/1 & o!rs1 :o kill r&omly innoc5t p4 ,by def9ition1 !y are also t]rori/s1 ev5 if !y act alone1 )\t any connection to a gr\p4 ,x is cle> t a society c't protect itself aga9/ t]rorism ?r\gh /rict] laws4 ,! t\gh] laws w det]m9e ! disappe>ance ( exactly ^? facilities1 :i* p]mitt$ ! progress ( ! society4 ,multiple levels ( security w produce ! fragm5tation ( ! society4 ,?us1 due to ! r$uction ( ! capability to communicate1 ! level ( g5]alis$ s*izophr5ia increases4 ,?is c\ld lead to a disa/] on long-t]m4 ,n any p]son :o refuses symbolic models w h t]rori/ t5d5cies4 ,!re are adaptation =ms to a _w t evolves 9 ano!r direction ?an ! "o desir$ by "s4 ,9 ! attempt to f9d ! individuals ) t5d5cies t[>ds t]rorism1 "o c consid] a few aspects3 #a4 ,*ildr5 :o h be5 normal at bir?1 b h be5 abus$ dur+ *ildhood1 are on ! highe/ level ( risk4 ,individuals aggress$ explicitly or implicitly by ! environm5t1 c build illegal models1 :i* ent] _! ,,psm2 ! ones ) difficulties ( communication h ! t5d5cy to build too %ort-range models = und]/&+ ! _w !y live 9 7s*izophr5ia ,,xs #a & #b74 #b4 ,! /resses g5]at+ %ield+ models & illegal models c affect any p]son1 z society is v complex4 ,= p]sons f 'imagi/ic' c\ntries1 an important s\rce ( /ress is ! assimilation & op]ation ( advanc$ symbolic models4 ,=c+ !m to evolve f an image plat=m to high level symbolic models c de/abilize ! /ructure ( models4 ,= ! 'symbolic' c\ntries1 ! same c happ5 on a m r$uc$ scale4 #c4 ,! isolation or elim9ation f society ( ! individuals ) cle> t5d5cies t[>ds ! de/ruction ( ! democratic sy/em4 #d4 ,relaxation 9 ! protection ( privacy4 ,! s-call$ "r to privacy hides important s\rces ( /ress bo? = ! p protect$ by ?is "r1 & ! ones ar\nd him_/h]4 ,if ev]ybody w\ld accept ! op5+ ( _! privacy1 ! society z a :ole w\ld h less real problems4 ,! work+ pr9ciple ( democracy %\ld be some:at modifi$1 i4e4 a democratic sy/em protects only ^? :o respect democracy4 ,?us1 ! individuals :o fight aga9/ democracy %\ld n be protect$ by ! democratic sy/em4 ,conclusion3 ,! evolution ( society is bas$ on symbolic models4 ,^? :o h n ! capacity to foll[ ?is tr5d w 'run = %elt]' into image models4 ,sl[ly a break w occur betwe5 'symbolic' & 'image' p4 ,! 'image' p1 :o are n ^? :o pu% ! society =w>d1 w see t1 f _! po9t ( view1 society goes into a wrong direction4 ,"o ( ! extreme answ]s to ?is situation is t]rorism4 ,w>n+3 ,! individuals bas$ on image models d n accept logical argum5tation1 because logic is an exclusive *>act]i/ic ( symbolic models4 ,,eta #aa3 ,problems ( human bra9 evolution ,?is problem is already develop$ 9 ! g5]al !ory4 ,a few additions w be giv5 "h4 ,z we "k f ! g5]al !ory1 we h an ability to build & op]ate image models ,i1 & "o to build & op]ate symbolic models ,s4 ,g5]ally speak+1 ,i increas$ up to ab\t ! ye> #ahjj4 ,s _h a fir/ increase ) ! spok5 language4 ,x increas$ fur!r ) ! em]g5ce ( ! writt5 language4 ,an important /ep 0 ! developm5t ( geometry z a symbolic model by ,euclid1 ab\t #bcjj ye>s ago4 ,!n ,s /ay$ un*ang$ ab\t up to ! ye> #afff1 :5 ,newton's ,me*anics m>k$ ! evolution ( ! bra91 z ! second important fundam5tal symbolic model appe>$4 ,f t mom5t1 ,s />t$ an accel]at$ increase :i* cont9ues4 ,9 spite ( ! fact t ,i decreas$ 9 p]c5tage comp>$ to ,s1 9 an absolute mode1 x cont9u$ to increase due to ! support ( ,s4 ,un=tunately1 ?is evolution1 :i* is true e4g4 = ,europe1 is n true = "s o!r cultural regions4 ,"s nations refuse basically symbolic models1 b are =c$ to use !m4 ,!re is a risk ( splitt+ ! _w1 due to ! m & m r$uc$ capacity ( communication betwe5 ! two p>ts ( x4 ,! same situation may happ5 inside "o c\ntry ) gr\ps ( p4 ,! two p>ts are n symmetrical4 ,! ones bas$ on ,s are ! vectors ( progress & p[]1 9 any s5se4 ,! o!rs are unable to ma9ta9 a rhy?m ( evolution1 b are1 h[ev]1 help$ by ! ,s nations1 = /ability reasons1 & due to ! lack ( o!r solutions4 ,! ,i nations accept ?is help1 especially = practical reasons & opportunism4 ,on long range1 ?is problem has no solution )9 ! frame ( ! g5]ally accept$ democratic sy/em4 ,)9 ! ,s c\ntries1 a /ructure exi/s z well4 ,?us1 "s p]sons h a high] ,s ?an o!rs4 ,9 g5]al1 ! ,i-type p 9 a /ructure ( ,s-type deta9 ! p[]4 ,! "t :5 ! ,s p w\ld h control is n )9 view4 7,s-type p are call$ te*nocrats74 ,due to ! l>ge disp]sion betwe5 ,i & ,s levels1 !re is no hope at ! mom5t t a unique symbolic model w ev] exi/ to describe correctly ! :ole social /ructure4 ,z a consequ5ce1 ! te*nocrats 7! ,s p 9 an ,s type society7 are n effici5t yet1 except 9 relatively n>r[ doma9s4 ,! politicians ( today are ^? :o h qualities 9 bo? image & symbolic areas4 ,!y c cov] approximately ! :ole society4 ,h[ev]1 ! developm5t ( ! society w =ce !m to r$irect m & m to symbolic models4 ,! basic problem associat$ ) any society is ! too wide disp]sion betwe5 ! ,i & ,s levels1 & its increase z ! society evolves4 ,"s explanations = ?is disp]sion1 bas$ on ,,mdt1 are giv5 bel[3 #a4 ,! models are built *aotically4 ,! /ructure ( models1 includ+ ,,psm1 conta9s important & less important models4 ,?is is also a problem ( education 9 e>ly *ildhood4 #b4 ,education & assimilation ( new k cont9ues to be bas$ on a too l>ge scale on ,i models4 #c4 ,! /ructure ( models1 includ+ ,,psm1 is almo/ inv>iant &1 z a consequ5ce1 ! bra9 has n ! flexibility requir$ by a fa/ evolution ( ! society4 #d4 ,education is *aotic4 ,too _m image models are built 9 ! p]iod ( developm5t1 & ! symbolic models are n adequate to reality4 ,= in/ance1 ma!matical calculations are pref]$ to ! con/ruction & op]ation ( g5]al symbolic models4 ,ev5 worse1 ! /ud5ts are n taught to ?9k bas$ on symbolic models4 ,t]ms l image model 7analog7 & symbolic model are n kn[n at ! level ( g5]al =mal education4 ,image models %\ld be taught />t+ 9 fir/ class1 & symbolic models ) eight class4 ,ev5 worse1 ^? :o "w ) symbolic models are n always aw>e ( x4 ,_m physici/s are n aw>e t ,newton's ,me*anics is a symbolic model4 #e4 ,! design defici5cies ( ! bra9 are n %[n or recognis$1 & z su*1 c't be comp5sat$ = 7see g5]al !ory74 ,conclusion3 ,! bra9 evolves f image to symbolic models4 ,! disp]sion betwe5 ! ,s-levels ( p1 c\ntries & cultural zones is increas+4 ,?is increas+ disp]sion1 toge!r ) ! design & te*nological problems1 creates fundam5talism 7"s c't cont9ue _! evolution74 ,fundam5talism is a ?reat = ! _w z a :ole4 ,! possible solutions are unacceptable )9 ! frame ( ! democratic pr9ciples4 ,,eta #ab3 ,! rattlesnake ,! rattlesnake produces a cont9u\s /rong s\nd :5 x is attack$ or is attack+4 ,x is also kn[n t x has no he>+4 ,,mdt expla9s ?is attack & def5se facility4 ,! basic function ( any bra9 7includ+ animal7 is to build automatically models bas$ on ! in=mation f ext]nal reality4 ,a repeat$ s\nd w activate cont9u\sly an image model1 :i* w try to pr$ict ! occur5ce ( any new s\nd4 ,x is rem9d$ t ?is h>dw>e function is active1 & ma9ta9$ active automatically1 by any bra94 ,!re is no possibility to ignore1 or n he> ^! s\nds4 ,! s\nd produc$ by ! rattlesnake w activate repeat$ly 7hundr$s ( times 9 a second7 a s\nd receiv+ model at ! animals ar\nd4 ,^! animals w use a lot ( en]gy to update ! model4 ,?us1 ! animals w h difficulties to build & activate a model1 ei!r = attack or def5se4 ,! ph5om5on is ! same = humans4 ,! s\nds repeat$ or n- dim9i% our capacity to d any int5se intellectual activity4 ,,eta #ac3 ,! ma9 psy*iatric illnesses3 p>anoia & s*izophr5ia ,! t]ms p>anoia & s*izophr5ia h no def9ition 9 psy*iatry4 ,!y h only descriptions4 ,,mdt is able to g5]ate normal def9ition = ^! defici5ces4 ,9 a sci5tific !ory1 ! def9itions are g5]at$ by ! model &1 z su*1 c't be comp>$ to ! descriptive def9itions f pres5t psy*iatry4 ,h[ev]1 z 9 ! common language we meet ^! two t]ms1 z we d n want to inv5t new t]ms1 !y h be5 kept1 b ) ! def9itions z g5]at$ by ,,mdt4 ,! g5]al !ory does n def9e1 9 fact1 ! diseases4 ,x def9es only /atus & p>amet]s4 ,a /atus is consid]$ pa?ological1 if "s p>amet]s h values beyond c]ta9 limits1 m or less conv5tionally impos$4 ,example3 ,9 ,,mdt1 ! s*izophr5ia p>amet] ( a normal bra9 occurs at any "t hav+ a diff]5t value4 ,! value c be l[] 7bett]7 or high] 7worse71 at diff]5t mom5ts4 ,sometimes ?is p>amet] c rea* ! limit consid]$ pa?ological1 ev5 if ! p]son is n sick4 ,! illness is decl>$ if ?is p>amet] is p]man5tly & significantly 9 ! pa?ological zone4 ,we'll describe & !n1 def9e ! two fundam5tal illnesses1 z !y appe> 9 ,,mdt4 ,s*izophr5ia ,! *>act]i/ics f light] to sev]e cases are3 ,,xs#a3 n en\gh long-range models exi/ 9 ord] to und]/& ! ext]nal reality4 ,! individuals int]act normally ) ext]nal reality1 b ! context to und]/& ! prim>y facts is miss+ sometimes 7miss+ long- range pr$ictions74 ,^! individuals succesfully integrate 9 society1 n by all means 9 unfav\r$ positions 7on ! contr>y1 z we w see lat]74 ,,xs#b3 ,bad und]/&+ ( :at is go+ on 9 front ( _! eyes1 due to ! fact t ! necess>y models are poor quality or inadequate4 ,! capacity to build & op]ate %ort-range models is ma9ta9$4 ,^! individuals are mo/ly able to be integrat$ 9 society1 if !y h a model ( int]e/ = ! society4 ,,xs#c3 ,! p]son has no adequate long-range model = ! ext]nal reality1 %ort-range models are sc>ce4 ,example3 ,! p]son does n "k :]e he_/%e is1 ev5 if 9 8_/h] own room4 ,su* a p]son uses only v l[ quality models1 mo/ ( !m be+ compon5ts ( ,,psm4 ,! *ances ( integration 9 society are v limit$4 ,on /atic analysis1 ,,xs#a is situat$ 9 ! non-pa?ological zone1 ,,xs#b is on ! bord]1 & ,,xs#c is pa?ological4 ,! s*izophr5ia p>amet] is v>iable 9 "t4 ,a normal p]son c be tempor>ily 9 ,,xs#b /atus1 & if drunk1 s$at$ or tir$1 ev5 9 ,,xs#c1 )\t be+ decl>$ pa?ologically s*izophr5ic4 ,we'll analyze ,,xs#a 9 detail2 two situations c occur3 ,,xs#a;,a3 ,! p]son has sev]al models1 includ+ long-range1 associat$ ) "s doma9s ( activity4 ,^! all[ him to be integrat$ 9 society 9 a good positions4 ,= su* a p]son1 "s models associat$ to laws_/rules ( integration 9 an advanc$ society1 bas$ on long-range symbolic models1 are miss+1 or ( l[ quality4 ,! abs5ce ( ^! models c lead to anti- social acts1 ( :i* ! p]son c't be aw>e4 ,social problems occur :5 ?is type ( individuals is 9 a l>ge numb] 9 a society4 ,,xs#a;,b3 ,! p]son c build long- & %ort-range models associat$ to any ext]nal reality1 b 9 curr5t life1 he ne$s only v few ( !m4 ,?us ! capacity to build long-range models is dim9i%$4 ,! long-range models exi/1 z impos$ f ! outside1 by education4 ,?is is a society-induc$ s*izophr5ia4 ,z long z ! requirem5ts ( ! society d n *ange1 ! individual is integrat$ p]fectly 9 ! society4 ,if ! requirem5ts ( ! society *ange1 ! p]son has to acquire new long-range models1 z !y are g5]at$ by ! society1 to re9tegrate into x4 ,! capability to build own models is dim9i%$ to z]o4 ,= bo? ,,xs#a;,a & ,,xs#a;,b cases x is *>act]i/ic t ! capacity to build long-range models on _! own is extremely r$uc$4 ,! p]sons c 9 bo? cases assimilate ext]nal long-range models4 ,:ile ,,xs#a;,a has a r$uc$ capacity to bo? build & assimilate models1 ,,xs#a;,b _h initially ^! facilities1 b !y 7 lo/ 9 "t due to lack ( use4 ,induc$ s*izophr5ia 7,,xs#a;,b7 is a great advantage = a p]son integrat$ 9 a /able society1 z x ensures adequate models to t society4 ,at any *ange 9 ! society1 ! individuals are =c$ to acquire new models1 z !y h a r$uc$ capacity to build _! own4 ,example3 ,driv+ /yle 9 an advanc$ c\ntry ,au?orities en=ce ! traffic laws = g5]ations4 ,any p]sonalis$ /yle ( driv+ is puni%$4 ,?us1 ! capacity to build own models is r$uc$ to disappe>ance4 ,if ! environm5t is non-aggressive1 ! driv]s w h less & less self-protection capacity at mi/akes made by o!rs4 ,*a9 accid5ts are a direct consequ5ce ( induc$ s*izophr5ia 7,,xs#a;,b74 ,!re are #b possibilities3 #a4 ,we accept induc$ s*izophr5ia1 & we build saf] & saf] c>s & infra/ructures4 #b4 ,we accept p]sonaliz$ driv+ 7aggressive /yle is n puni%$ anymore74 ,an aggressive environm5t /imulates ! developm5t ( intellig5ce &1 z su*1 ! capacity ( build+ & op]ation ( long-range models4 ,! aggressivity ( ! environm5t makes mo/ driv]s bett] or m capable to react correctly to impr$ictable situations1 includ+ o!rs mi/akes4 ,if ! inexp]i5c$ driv]s w feel aggress$1 !y become ei!r exp]i5c$ or !y w give up driv+4 ,society w come at "s po9t to analyze bo? v>iants1 ) _! advantages & disadvantages4 ,n[ ! me?od us$ is s*izophr5ic3 we solve ! problem :i* already occur$1 ) ! hope t x won't reoccur 9 ! future4 ,?is me?od is unable to pr$ict :at o!r long-range problems might occur aft] ! *ange op]at$4 ,its only advantage is t is gives a p]sonal assurance 7includ+ legally7 to ! peson :o initiat$ ! solution4 ,! !ory %[s ! exi/5ce ( a basic dilemma connect$ to ! problem describ$ above3 optimisation or capacity to face an aggressive environm5t4 ,! t5d5cy ( induc$ s*izophr5ia occurs 9 an optimis$ /ructure ) sl[ *anges4 ,! individuals h optimal reactions z long z ! environm5t is /able4 ,at a *ange ( ! environm5t1 !y h a r$uc$ capacity to become compatible ) ! *ang$ environm5t4 ,9 a new environm5t1 ! favoris$ are ! aggressive ones1 z !y h ! capacity to build & op]ate _! own long-range models4 ,we cont9ue ) ! induc$ s*izophr5ia 7,,xs#a;,b74 ,:5 "o ( ^! life /yles is foll[$ = a long "t1 ! p]son is go+ to be affect$ by s*izophr5ia induc$ by ! environm5t1 :i* 9 "t c become pa?ological4 ,?is negative ph5om5on c be att5uat$ to a c]ta9 ext5t1 because ( ! p]man5t *anges 9 society4 ,^! *anges are =c+ ! population 9 advanc$ c\ntries to come up ) new models e day4 ,ev5 ?\gh society =ces p to build & op]ate new models e day1 "s d n h ! capability to d ?is4 ,because evolution is bas$ on symbolic models1 "s p may n be able to build symbolic models ( good quality4 ,?us1 !re might be a gr\p ( p t _c fit anymore 9 ! society1 might isolate !mselves or ev5 oppose to ! society4 ,?is way1 induc$ s*izophr5ia 7,,xs#a;,b7 might build %ield+ models1 :i* c\ld act aga9/ society4 ,if ?is gr\p ga9s en\gh p[]1 x c\ld try to de/abilize ! society4 ,s*izophr5ia c appe> 9 an unlimit$ numb] ( types1 dep5d+ on ! p]turbations1 :i* are associat$ ) ! fundam5tal process ( ! bra9 op]ation4 ,! affect$ functions are3 - ,! con/ruction ( new models & ! cont9u\s improvem5t 9 accordance ) ! *ang+ ext]nal reality4 - ,! integration ( a new model 9 ! /ructure ( models ( ! bra94 ,! long-range models mu/ conta9 en\gh %ort-range models to h&le ! ext]nal reality1 :i* is complex & *ang+4 ,bas$ on ! above consid]ations1 ! normal def9ition ( s*izophr5ia w be giv53 ,s*izophr5ia is a te*nological problem ( ! bra94 ,! bra9 _c build complex models t fit ! ext]nal reality1 & integrate !m 9 a h>monic_/logic way 9 its g5]al /ructure ( models4 ,! function ( build+ & op]at+ %ort-range models is ma9ta9$4 ,_m times1 s*izophr5ics on ! fir/ level 7,,xs#a7 c be brilliant 9 ! con/ruction ( %ort-range models4 ,9 %ort1 = humans1 s*izophr5ia is %ort-range ?9k+4 ,we w cont9ue to describe ! s*izophr5ia ( type ,,xs#a ,a & ,b4 ,?is nonpa?ological =m ( s*izophr5ia c br+ "s big advantages to t p]son4 ,long-range models use a great am\nt ( en]gy 9 ord] to be suitable to ! *ang+ ext]nal reality1 & are also develop$ to f9d ! be/ solution to problems4 ,9 a /able society1 _m su* models are ( little use1 because ! society imposes c]ta9 models1 t ne$ only be assimilat$4 ,?is way1 a p]son :o has ,,xs#a ,a or ,b w use ! en]gy only to make bett] & bett] %ort-range models4 ,?us1 a /able & effici5t society favorises ! ,,xs#a s*izophr5ia4 ,let's see an important factor associat$ to ! education sy/em4 ,! :ole educational sy/em is bas$ on assimilation ( ext]nal models & v]fications ( ! assimilation ( ^! models4 ,! con/ruction ( new models is totally unfavor$4 ,?us1 ! g5]al education sy/em favorizes ! developm5t ( induc$ s*izophr5ia 7,,xs#a;,b74 ,! effect is deva/at+ = ! society1 if we take into acc\nt ! consci\sness issue4 ,! !ory def9es consci\sness z ! capacity to build long-range models conta9+ ! p]son z an elem5t4 ,?us1 ! educational sy/em favorizes implicitly ^? :o h a l[-level consci\sness4 ,! second ma9 psy*iatric illness is p>anoia ,,xp4 ,p>anoia is def9$ z ! inclusion ( an ord9>y model 7,,om7 into ,,psm 7,,ompsm74 ,! basic *>act]i/ic ( a model 9 ,,psm is its inv>iance4 ,^! models are practically impossible to be *ang$1 :atev] ! in=mation com+ f ext]nal reality w\ld be4 ,:5 !re is an ,,ompsm1 all ! models conta9$ 9 ! bra9 h to be 9 h>mony ) ?is inv>iant model z well4 ,:5 a new model is built1 "s in=mation com+ f ext]nal reality c\ld be 9 contradiction ) ,,ompsm4 ,9 ?is case1 ! only way to integrate ! new in=mation ) ! condition impos$ by ,,ompsm is to di/ort ! ,,zm :i* w int]grate t in=mation4 ,?is is possible only on image models4 ,on image models1 !re is no crit]ia to attribute to prim>y facts ! correct importance4 ,?us ! :ole /ructure ( models w be di/ort$ 9 ord] to be h>monic ) ,,ompsm 7e4g4 "s facts w be m9imaliz$ & o!r exagg]at$ z importance74 ,?is is :y p>anoia is to be und]/ood z an illness1 :i* affects p]sonality4 ,! p]sonality 9 its :ole is ( p>anoid type4 ,! /ructure ( models is or c be built p>tially h>monically2 ! associat$ symbolic models are built to be 9 accordance ) ! image models1 & sometimes1 ! p>anoid c h a brilliant h>monical & logical /ructure4 ,! detection ( p>anoia is v difficult1 z ! pati5ts c h no logical contradiction 9 _! ?9k+ /ructure1 & !y c h a good c\pl+ to ! *ang+ ext]nal reality4 ,_m p>anoids are brilliant 9 ?9k+1 ) an infallible logic4 ,! example ( ,hitl] is eloqu5t4 ,8 ,,ompsm 0 '! ,arian race is a sup]ior "o'4 ,:at foll[$ 0 bas$ on logic4 ,communi/ p]sonalities c be m5tion$ "h z well4 ,!y _h an ,,ompsm ( ! type '! work+ class is ! driv+ =ce ( progress'4 ,:5 an ,,ompsm exi/s1 !n we h a case ( p>anoia4 ,!re is no treatm5t = x4 ,ev5 if ,,ompsm c\ld be de/roy$1 ! :ole /ructure ( models 9 h>mony ) ! ,,ompsm %\ld be rebuilt1 & ?is is impossible4 ,we w talk n[ ( light =ms ( p>anoia1 undecl>$ z illness4 ,z we "k1 :5 a model becomes inv>iant1 all associat$ models w be di/ort$ to be 9 h>mony ) x4 ,let's suppose t a bra9 has a normally built model 9 accordance ) ext]nal reality4 ,?is model c\ld at "s po9t become totally inadequate 9 ! und]/&+ ( ext]nal reality due to a *ange 9 ! latt]4 ,! normal solution is ! recon/ruction ( ! :ole /ructure ( models1 b ?is activity w\ld be beyond ! te*nical capacity ( recon/ruction ( ! bra94 ,due to ?is1 "o ( ! possibilities is to leave ! model unt\*$4 ,9 ?is case1 we h a light =m ( p>anoia1 :i* manife/s itself z confusion or avoid+ discussions connect$ to ! model ) problems4 ,ano!r possibility is to build a %ield+ model4 ,%ield+ models d n modify ! inadequate model1 b c deactivate x4 ,z ?is is n pa?ological1 i4e4 no ,,ompsm exi/s1 ! illness c\ld be cur$1 especially at "y individuals4 ,?is type ( problem 7important normal models :i* d n fit ! ext]nal reality anymore7 c occur at any "t 9 light] or m s]i\s =ms4 ,prev5tion ( ?is light =m ( p>anoia c be done ) an adequate education4 ,,eta #ad3 ,suicide ,f ! g5]al !ory we "k t a basic requirem5t ( design ( ! bra9 is unconditional indef9ite survival4 ,h[ev] "s individuals commit suicide4 ,f ! g5]al !ory we also "k t models are s /rong t !y c pr$ict t soon] or lat] we w die4 ,z ?is pr$iction w activate ,,psm & ,,psm has no solution1 ?is c\ld de/abilize ! /ructure ( models4 ,! g5]al !ory also %[s t ! solution is to build a %ield+ model1 e4g4 religion4 ,?is model s5ds to ,,psm a less cata/rophic message1 :i* /abilizes ! situation4 ,"s religions are s /rong t !y c det]m9e 9 _! foll[]s no fe> ( dea?4 ,^! believ]s c commit suicide v easily1 if !y h a 's]i\s' reason1 )\t ! possibility ( int]v5tion ( ,,psm to block x4 ,=tunately1 ! ,*ri/ian religion is n /rong en\gh to elim9ate ! fe> ( dea?4 ,?is risk ( suicide 0 notic$ v e>ly1 & ?is is :y religions usually condemn suicide4 ,:atev] ! %ield+ model w\ld be 7religion or ano!r %ield+ model71 ,,psm w be block$ 9 case ( ! activation ( a suicide model4 ,! pres5ce ( an adequate %ield+ model c !re=e block ! ,,psm1 :i* wants to /op ! activation ( ! suicide model4 ,a class ( suicidal individuals consi/s ( ^? p t aft] ! disappe>ance ( an entity includ$ 9 _! ,,psm 7a v close p]son vani%es f _! life71 !y are unable to correct ! :ole /ructure ( models4 ,! bra9 gets un/able1 all-important models might become unusable & ?is c lead to suicide4 ,ano!r class ( suicidal individuals is t ( ^? :o h all _! models block$ 7associat$ ) g5]al depression74 ,! p]son c see t he_/%e c't evolve anymore1 ! pr$ictions are p]man5tly ! same1 & i4e4 !re is no hope to get out ( a c]ta9 situation4 ,?is c lead to suicide1 b ! bra9 ne$s to build on ! spot a %ield+ model1 9 ord] to h a 'successful' suicide4 ,if n1 ,,psm w int]v5e at ! la/ mom5t to avoid x4 ,a classical example is :5 somebody :o has a lot ( money looses x all at once 7! great depression 9 #aibi 9 ,,usa1 = in/ance74 ,) all models block$1 ! individual has no capacity to build new models adequate to ! new ext]nal reality & suicide becomes an option4 ,!re is a special class ( suicidal individuals1 "u #ah4 ,?is c be associat$ to ! fact t te5ag]s h a limit$ am\nt ( long range models ) lots ( imp]fections4 ,^! models are insuffici5tly develop$ to %[ ! :ole ho/ ( directions ( evolution op54 ,^! models c easily pr$ict a situation ( g5]alis$ block+1 & f "h1 ! t5d5cy = suicide4 ,x is cle> t only a simultane\s g5]alis$ block+ c\ld be a cause = suicide4 ,we repeat t )\t an adequate %ield+ model1 ,,psm w det]m9e ! insuccess ( ! suicidal attempt 9 ! la/ mom5t4 ,obvi\sly1 !re are p]sons :o h psy*iatric illnesses1 z def9$ by ?is !ory4 ,9 _! case1 additional factors w add up1 associat$ to _! illness4 ,,eta #ae3 ,normality te/s ,hav+ def9$ s*izophr5ia & p>anoia1 we w describe two te/s to detect ^! illnesses4 ,t#a & ,t#b detect s*izophr5ia1 & ,t#b alone detects p>anoia4 ,t#a4 ,9 front ( a complex ext]nal reality1 an individual has to be able to realize if he_/%e has en\gh in=mation to build a suitable model4 ,f ! g5]al !ory1 we "k t ! bra9 w build h>monic_/ logic models bas$ on ! available in=mation4 ,?is is ! problem3 we don't "k be=eh& h[ _m elem5ts are !re 9 ! ext]nal reality4 ,! models are built ) :at is available4 ,we c\ld n realize t we h n en\gh in=mation to build a good model 7see g5]al !ory3 ,defieci5cies 9 ! design ( ! bra974 ,! te/ wants to v]ify is we c comp5sate ?is design defici5cy4 ,example3 ,! prim>y in=mation is3 'a c> cra%$ into a wall'4 ,! p]son has to build sev]al models4 ,^! models c\ld be1 9 ?is example3 - accid5t - te/ - movie - comput] game - c>toon ,?is is j an example4 ,9 an actual situation1 ! p]son %\ld n only build sev]al models1 b also develop !m progressively1 9 p>allel1 along ) new data add+ to ! initial in=mation4 ,aft] a c]ta9 accumulation ( in=mation1 ! p]son might /abilize to a s+le model1 b if he_/%e has n en\gh in=mation1 & does n realize x1 ?is c be a sign t !re c\ld be a problem4 ,! te/ is usually pass$ well1 if ! p]son ma9ta9s 8_/h] flexibility1 ev5 aft] !re is app>5tly en\gh in=mation to get /able 9 a model4 ,! exi/5ce ( flexibility is und]/ood z a gu>antee t ! p]son has ! capability to build long-range models4 ,& also t he_/%e has no ,,ompsm1 i4e4 is n p>anoid4 ,!re is a game bas$ on ?is idea3 "o builds a model1 & ! o!r has to guess :at ! model is4 ,to d ?is1 he_/%e has to ask que/ions to be answ]$ only by yes & no4 ,t#b4 ,te/ = detection ( p>anoia4 ,an individual accepts a *ange 9 a /able model1 if ! ext]nal reality imposes x4 ,9 a practical situation1 ! p]son int]acts ) ext]nal reality & builds a model1 :i* gives good pr$ictions on ! ext]nal reality4 ,at "s po9t1 an elem5t ( ! ext]nal reality is *ang$4 ,if ! p]son detects ! *ange & corrects ! model1 z well z ! o!r int]connect$ models1 ?is is a good indication ( normality4 ,= a p]son suspect$ ( p>anoia1 ! model us$ w\ld be ! "o suppos$ to be ! ,,ompsm4 ,p>anoid subjects c di/ort ! ext]nal reality unlimit$ly to make x compatible ) _! ,,ompsm4 ,z a consequ5ce1 ! te/ tries to see if ! p]son suspect$ ( p>anoia w modify ! suppos$ ,,ompsm4 ,to be applicable1 ! te/ z describ$ above1 ne$s to take into acc\nt a design defici5cy ( ! bra91 z giv5 9 ! g5]al !ory4 ,any image model has a basic problem3 on an image model "o c't see ! importance ( an elem5t or a relation%ip4 ,! image model rema9s h>monic = an inf9ity ( values ( importance1 giv5 to ! elem5ts or relations4 ,due to ?is issue1 ! p>anoid subjects d n realize ! pres5ce ( _! illness4 ,except ^! classical psy*iatric illnesses1 !re are illnesses produc$ by dynamical & transitory in/abilities ( ! bra94 ,! illnesses giv5 by dynamical or transitory problems ref] to ! loss ( models /ability 9 special conditions or at c]ta9 mom5ts ( "t4 ,! ,,xzm 7illegal models7 c\ld also expla9 a s]ies ( problems4 ,! g5]al !ory addresses ?is issue4 ,we'll make ano!r note "h4 ,! !ory is appli$ "h 9 p>ticul> to normal individuals4 ,! pa?ological cases are n g5]ally consid]$ at ?is level4 ,x is actually absurd to /udy pa?ological cases 9 ! abs5ce ( a good model associat$ to normal p]sons4 ,,eta #af3 ,dreams ,! dreams are associat$ to image model developm5t4 ,su* models are built1 bas$ on ! available data 9 ! bra9 & n by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,we call ! s\rce ( data = ! dreams z ,quasi- ,ext]nal-,reality4 ,,q] c\ld take in=mation f any available model ( ! bra9 to build & develop ! dream-model4 ,,q] is inv>iant dur+ a dream4 ,a dream is a model1 :i* is develop$1 bas$ on an inv>iant ,,q]4 ,we %all describe sev]al classes ( dreams4 #a4 ,,q] is ma9ly bas$ on ! ext]nal reality1 b conta9s also "s artificial elem5ts or relations4 ,a dream bas$ on artificial compon5ts1 tries1 by developm5t1 to modify ! ext]nal reality to meet ! dream4 ,example3 we dream a situation4 ,su* a situation doesn't meet ! ext]nal reality1 because "s artificial elem5ts or relations are add$4 ,! dream c activate "s models to *ange ! ext]nal reality1 to meet ! specifications ( ! dream4 #b4 ,te*nological dreams 7wake-up dreams7 ,! bra9 g5]ates su* dreams4 ,!y solve by s(tw>e1 "s ( ! design defici5cies ( ! bra94 ,! mo/ important te*nological dreams are wake-up dreams4 ,!re are normal wake-up dreams1 em]g5cy wake-up dreams & nightm>e dreams4 ,!y are g5]at$ to wake-up a bra91 because1 due to a lack ( a suitable h>dw>e1 ! bra9 mu/ g5]ate ! wake-up function bas$ on s(tw>e4 ,! ma9 design feature ( ! bra91 :i* is us$ by ^! te*nological dreams1 is to activate ! ,,psm4 ,z ! ,,psm is activat$1 ! bra9 wake-up1 i4e4 a normal ,,zm1 is activat$4 ,usually1 ! ,,psm is activat$ by "s unusual *anges ( ! ext]nal reality 7p[]ful noises1 me*anical %ocks44474 ,! wake-up dreams try to activate ! ,,psm by s(tw>e4 ,to d ?is1 a wake-up dream s5ds to ,,psm ! in=mation t !re is a situation & no suitable model to und]/& x4 ,z we already "k1 :5 !re is no model to und]/& a specific ext]nal reality1 ! ,,psm is activat$4 ,= a wake-up model1 ext]nal reality is replac$ by ,quasi-,ext]nal-,reality 7,,q]74 ,,mdt does n specify :i* compon5t ( ! bra9 />ts ! dream 7?is is a te*nological feature74 ,! compon5ts c\ld be associat$ ) ! int]nal body or to ! s5se organs4 ,! cont5t ( ! dream is n important4 ,any dream t activates ! ,,psm is good4 ,s an important problem associat$ ) ! heal? ( ! be+ or an unimportant problem c\ld build ! same dream4 ,only ! "* ( ! dream is important4 ,9 case ( a wake-up dream ! "* has to be tak5 into acc\nt3 - im95t dang] to ! p]son means t !re is a big problem associat$ to heal? or ! environm5t :]e ! p]son is sleep+4 ,also1 x c\ld be a problem associat$ ) some?+ :i* is includ$1 z a model1 into ! ,,psm 7close relatives1 "s objects or situations1 "s problems etc74 - !re is a dang]1 b x is n associat$ to ! p]son or close relatives4 - ,x is a neutral dream1 no dang]4 ,?is is a normal wake-up dream4 ,= in/ance3 ! dream is associat$ ) a fl[]4 ,! p]son wants to pick t fl[]1 b fails4 ,?is situation activates ! ,,psm1 :i* activates ! wake- up proc$ure4 ,"o problem c\ld occur3 h[ does ! bra9 "k t a c]ta9 dream w activate ! ,,psm8 ,a possible answ] is t a dream w develop by simulation1 on & on1 up to ! mom5t :5 ! ,,psm is activat$4 ,:5 ! wake-up occurs1 ! fir/ active-,,zm w be t "o :i* activat$ ! ,,psm & s1 x w be rememb]$4 ,!re is an important feature ( ,,q] to be pres5t$ "h4 ,,q] is built on ! spot1 because x is associat$ to a problem1 :i* has to be solv$ v fa/4 ,?us1 ,,q] _c be too complex4 ,x is easy to simulate ! developm5t on a simple model1 :i* _c be solv$ by ! dream model4 ,example3 ,! ,,q] is associat$ ) a room4 ,if1 dur+ a dream1 ! p]son wants g outside ! room1 ?is is impossible1 because ! ,,q] doesn't conta9 ! ext]ior ( ! room4 ,?us1 x is impossible to g outside & s ! ,,psm is activat$4 #c4 ,! nightm>e dreams are associat$ ) a g5]al in/ability ( ! /ructure ( models4 ,a nightm>e _c occur 9 a bra9 :i* is 9 a normal /atus4 ,a nightm>e dream might try to activate ! ,,psm1 b ! ,,psm does n activate4 ,ev5 m1 if ! ,,psm activates 7! nightm>e becomes ! active- ,,zm7 ! nightm>e cont9ues4 ,?is problem is too closely associat$ to ! te*nological implem5tation ( ! bra9 & s x _c be treat$ by ! !ory only4 #d4 ,we %all introduce ano!r class ( dreams3 premonition dreams4 ,!re are _m ,,zam-type models1 :i* "w v well = a long "t4 ,b1 z ! p]son ages1 "s ( !m _c meet ! requirem5ts due to ! *anges 9 ! int]nal p>amet]s ( ! execution organs 7legs1 h&s etc74 ,su* models self-activate dur+ sleep 7?is is a premonitive-type dream7 & f9d t !y don't meet ! requirem5ts anymore4 ,?is result c activate ! ,,psm too & produces ! wake-up4 ,! cont5ts ( su* dreams is important b1 un=tunately1 x is difficult to make ! diff]5ce betwe5 a wake-up dream & a premonition dream4 ,anyways1 a premonition dream has to be tak5 z a s]i\s w>n+4 ,! dreams are associat$ ) ! te*nological implem5tation ( ! bra94 ,,mdt1 z a fundam5tal !ory1 _c g beyond a limit4 ,:at 0 pres5t$ "h has to be consid]$ j an evaluation ( ! dream problem4 ,,eta #ag3 ,! hi/ory ( evolution ( ! human species1 bas$ on ,,mdt ,! prim>y data are tak5 f diff]5t diction>ies1 z ?is data is univ]sally accept$4 ,only data associat$ ) ! developm5t ( ! symbolic models h be5 select$4 ,note3 ,! diction>ies pres5t ! data ma9ly bas$ on feel+1 or bas$ on local models1 to select :at is important or n4 ,i select$ only ! data associat$ ) ! evolution ( ! symbolic models1 z ,,mdt und]/&s ?is process4 ,! evolution ( ! human species means ! increase ( p[] ( ! symbolic model4 ,?is hi/ory foll[s j ?is idea4 #gj milions ye>s ago3 ,! fir/ sup]ior monkeys #d milions ye>s ago3 ,"s monkeys walk4 #b milions ye>s ago3 ,/one tools4 ,?is is associat$ ) ! appe>ance on l>ge scale ( ! long-range image models4 #bjj ?\s&s ye>s ago3 ,homo ,sapi5s4 ,homo ,sapi5s 0 able to build easily long-range image models4 ,usually1 :5 a model is good1 !re is ! t5d5cy to integrate x into ! ,,psm4 ,a ,,psm model is v effici5t1 b1 because x is inv>iant1 x sl[s d[n ! evolution4 ,homo ,sapi5s seems to h evolv$ 9 a direction contr>y to long-range effici5cy4 ,t is1 in/ead ( includ+ !m 9 ! ,,psm1 su* models 7 *ang$ on & on1 & !y 7 n transmitt$ to ! next g5]ation by h]$ity1 b by social life ( ! gr\ps4 ,t is1 ! gr\ps 7 /able = a v long "t4 ,x is n cle> if ,homo ,sapi5s 0 able to communicate bas$ on symbolic models1 b1 = sure1 ! communication 0 bas$ on symbolic elem5ts1 at lea/ 9 "p4 #acj ?\s&s ye>s ago3 ,art-type1 religion-type activities4 ,on su* a level1 x is cle> t ! con/ruction ( long-range image models 0 v easy & ?us1 ! pr$iction ( dea? & dea? itself 7 und]/ood4 ,art & religion _c be directly associat$ ) ! symbolic models1 s we don't "k if ! language itself1 z a symbolic model1 appe>$ at t "t4 ,bas$ on ,,mdt1 ! human be+ is ! be+ :i* is able to make & op]ate symbolic models 7a language1 z a m9imal requirem5t74 ,?us1 ,i don't "k1 bas$ on ! data1 :5 ! language appe>$1 b ! supposition is t x 0 "u developm5t1 once ! activities 7 s complex by comp>ison to ! animal level4 ,sev]al ?\s&s ye>s ago3 ! cities4 ,a full language 0 already creat$ & "s elem5ts ( ! writ+ too4 #cgjj ye>s ago3 ! fir/ phonetical elem5ts = writ+ appe>$1 & lat] 7ab\t #bijj ye>s ago71 ! fir/ phonetic alphabet4 ,?is is a crucial po9t ( ! evolution ( ! human species4 ,! bra9 builds an image model4 ,?is image model is translat$ to a symbolic model by ! spok5 language4 ,= writ+1 !re are two basic possibilities3 to associate a symbolic writ+ to ! image model1 or to translate ! symbolic model ( ! spok5 language to ano!r symbolic model ( ! writ+4 ,! ,asiatic p *ose ! fir/ possibility4 ,!y built an iconographic writ+4 ,! second possibility g5]at$ ! phonetic alphabet4 ,! impact ( ! appe>ance ( ! phonetic alphabet 0 huge4 ,! writ+ is n connect$ anymore to an image model1 b to ano!r symbolic model- ! spok5 language4 ,?us1 writ+ becomes indep5d5t f ! image model to :i* x is indirectly associat$4 ,lat]1 writ+ 0 able to influ5ce ! spok5 language1 & ?is t&em l$ to ! 'symbolic' ,man 9 ,europe4 ,! ,asiatic populations1 :o h us$ ! me?od ( description ( image models 9 writ+1 rema9$ /uck 9 icons associat$ to image models f _! m9ds4 ,?is _h a huge drawback 9 ! developm5t ( symbolic models4 ,?is is :y 9 ?is hi/ory1 ref]5ce is re/rict$ only to ! _w bas$ on phonetic writ+4 ,! phonetic writ+ has be5 a decisive /ep 9 ! evolution ( symbolic models1 due to its non-association ) image models4 ,on ! o!r h&1 ! ,*9ese spok5 language c be translat$ into a phonetic writ+1 b ?is mode c\ld n be us$ z su*1 z x w\ld produce a break f ! image models1 :i* con/itute ! basis ( ! ?9k+_/writ+ ( ?is p4 #acjj ,,bc3 ,mono!i/ religion appe>s 9 ,egypt4 ,?is type ( religion m>ks ! mom5t1 :5 ! logical analysis appli$ to religion g5]ates problems & contradictions1 associat$ ) ! exi/5ce ( sev]al gods4 ,! desire = logical ord] det]m9es an evolution t[>ds a mono!i/ religion4 ,h[ev] ! appe>ance ( ! mono!i/ religion 9 ,egypt 0 n a result ( ! increase ( ! level ( evolution ( human society 9 ^? times1 b 0 creat$ by ! lead]s ( ! society 7"o ( ! fir/ mono!i/ religions creat$ by ! p is ! ,*ri/ian religion74 #fjj ,,bc3 ,poetry4 ,a poem is a symbolic model1 :i* uses image & symbolic elem5ts & relations4 ,! poet has an inn] image model1 translates x to a symbolic model ) symbolic & image elem5ts1 :i* build up ! poem4 ,! read]_/li/5] w translate ! poem to an image model 9 8 m9d4 ,?is image model is suppos$ to be simil> to ! initial image model 9 ! m9d ( ! poet4 ,?us1 a poem is a way ( approximate transmission ( an image model f "o creator to a li/5]_/read]1 us+ symbolic models ) symbolic & images elem5ts z a 'vehicle'4 #cjj ,,bc3 ,euclid's ,geometry ,?is is ! fir/ fundam5tal symbolic model ev] creat$ 7a positive sci5ce74 ,x m>ks a v important mom5t 9 ! evolution ( ! bra94 ,?is symbolic model cont9ues to be us$ up to date & x is n *ang$ = #bcjj ye>s4 ,! second fundam5tal model w be creat$ only aft] #bjjj ye>s & x w be ,newton's ,me*anics4 ,! evolution ( ! bra9 0 v *aotic4 ,!re is ano!r symbolic model creat$ 9 ?is p]iod3 *ess4 ,?is symbolic model is a game 7x is n associat$ to ext]nal reality7 & x is n *ang$ 7j unimportant small *anges7 up to n[ z well4 ,?is game c be us$ z a te/ ( ! intr9sic capacity ( ! bra9 to make & op]ate long-range symbolic models4 #cj ,,bc3 ,*ri/ian ,religion />ts to be creat$ ,! ,*ri/ian religion appe>s & develops 9 ! ,roman ,empire z a result ( ! increas+ capacity to make & op]ate symbolic models1 & due to ! increase ( ! consci\sness level ( ! population4 ,! logical ord] reque/s a mono!i/ religion4 ,! increase ( ! level ( consci\sness /r5g!ns ! pr$iction ( dea?4 ,a p[]ful religion is reque/$ = ?is high] level ( ! evolution ( ! bra94 ,*ri/ian religion 0 creat$ 9 accordance ) ?is situation4 #ige ,,bc3 ,! decimal positional writ+ ( ! num]als1 tak5 f ,arabs1 appe>s 9 ,europe4 ,! ,roman repres5tation ( ! num]als is associat$ to image models4 ,?is new way ( writ+ has no connection ) ! image models4 ,to use su* a repres5tation ( ! num]als1 "o ne$s only ! ability 9 ! symbolic field 7!re is a total break f image models74 #abej ,,bc3 ,! decimal positional writ+ ( ! num]als is univ]sally adopt$ 9 ,europe4 #adhb ,,bc3 ,! ,inquisition is e/abli%$4 ,x la/$ = c5turies z an in/itution = puni%m5t & basically speak+1 x p]si/s up-to-date 9 ano!r =m1 z a li/ ( =bidd5 books or ideas4 ,! bra9 developm5t rea*$ a high] level4 ,! free?9k+ bas$ on symbolic models op5$ ! m9ds ( a big fraction ( ! population4 ,?is ent]$ into a viol5t cla% ) ! inv>iant model ( ! religion4 ,9 t p]iod1 ! fir/ viol5t cla% betwe5 ! ,*ri/ian _s & ,european _s occur$4 ,! ,inquisition ev5tually disappe>$1 b n because religion evolv$1 b because ! ,european _s 0 m & m p[]ful4 #aedc ,,bc3 ,nikolaus ,cop]nicus publi%$ ! !ory t ! ,sun 7n ! ,e>?7 is ! c5t] ( ! ,univ]se4 ,x is v int]e/+ to "k t = ?\s&s ( ye>s1 ! (ficial !ory 0 t ! ,e>? is ! c5t] ( ! ,univ]se4 ,?is !ory pr$icts ! ,sun & ,moon eclipses1 & also ! ecuatorial & tropical l9es 7 e/abli%$ ) a fair precision4 ,s1 :at 0 ! problem8 ,! ma9 problem 0 ! imposibility to und]/& :y ! planets h a r *aotic movem5t on ! sky4 ,cop]nicus' !ory 0 able to expla9 :y ! planets h t app>5tly *aotic movem5t 7bas$ on logic71 b1 :5 ! a/ronom] ,j4 ,kepl] has v]ifi$ ! !ory1 x fail$4 ,kepl] ev5tually discov]$ t ! planets are n mov+ ar\nd ! ,sun on circul> orbits 7z ,cop]nicus said71 b on elliptical ones4 ,) ?is *ange1 ,cop]nicus' !ory 0 correct4 #aehe ,,bc3 decimal fractions ,! decimal positional writ+ ( ! num]als 0 univ]sally accept$ b ! fractions cont9u$ to be writt5 bas$ on image models 7e4g4 ! fraction #a_/b is easily und]/ood bas$ on image models74 ,only aft] ab\t #fjj ye>s ! decimal fractions 7 accept$4 ,ev5 s1 ! opposition to decimal fractions cont9ues up to date4 #afjg ,,bc3 ,! compos] ,montev]di compos$ ! musical "w call$ ,orpheus4 ,?is m>ks a mom5t :5 ! symbolic models support$ image models 9 music4 ,9 ! same p]iod1 ! recipe to compose a fugue 0 also e/abli%$4 ,europeans inv5t$ ! polyphonic music4 #afad ,,bc3 ! log>i?ms are introduc$ 9 ma!matics4 #afdj ,,bc3 ,r5e ,desc>tes1 sci5ti/ ,he consid]s t ! _w c be und]/ood bas$ on ma!matics4 ,?is is a high] level 9 ! develop+ ( ! symbolic models4 ,ma!matics is bas$ on symbolic models only4 ,9 fact1 any specific field ( ma!matics is a symbolic model4 ,b1 a symbolic model f ma!matics _c be us$ 9 a direct way to und]/& ! ext]nal reality4 ,newton's me*anics appe>$ at fir/ z a logical model1 & !n x 0 translat$ to a ma!matical =m4 ,ma!matics g5]ates only numb]s4 ,!y h no mean+ )\t ! calibration ( ! model4 ,to calibrate a model means to int]act ) ext]nal reality & s1 to g beyond ! limits ( ma!matics4 ,! normal int]action ) ext]nal reality ( a symbolic model f ma!matics is3 pr$iction comp>ison ) ext]nal reality *ange ( ! model a new pr$iction4 ,?is loop has to cont9ue z _m times z ne$$1 s t ! diff]5ce betwe5 ! pr$iction & ! ext]nal reality becomes acceptably l[4 ,x seems t ,desc>tes did n und]/& ?is4 ,?is problem seems to be difficult to be und]/ood ev5 9 our days1 tak+ into acc\nt t ! ma!matician ,godel prov$ ! exi/5ce ( ,god1 )\t any int]action ) ext]nal reality4 #afdb ,,bc3 ,rembr&t van ,rijn1 ! pa9t] ,rembr&t m>ks a mom5t :5 ! human bra9 rea*es a peak 9 build+ & op]at+ image models4 #afhg ,,bc3 ,newton's ,me*anics ,aft] ,euclid's ,geometry 7ab\t #bjjj ye>s ago7 ?is is ! second fundam5tal symbolic model creat$ by ! human m9d4 ,x is a big /ep 9 ! evolution ( ! bra94 ,/>t+ ) ,newton1 ! developm5t ( ! capacity to build & op]ate symbolic models accel]ates1 & ?is process cont9ues today4 ,newton is n well und]/ood ev5 9 our days4 ,"s diction>ies say t ,newton discov]$ ! law ( gravity4 ,?is law 0 introduc$ by ,newton to save 8 !ory4 ,! in]tia pr9ciple /ates t any mat]ial body1 :i* is left free1 is mov+ 9 a /raight l9e1 ) con/ant velocity to inf9ity4 ,b 9 ! ext]nal reality su* a ph5om5on is n met4 ,! planets are mov+ on clos$ trajectories 9 space4 ,! only solution to save ! !ory 0 to inv5t a new =ce1 :i* 0 call$ gravity4 ,e9/e91 = in/ance1 says t gravity does n exi/4 ,! app>5t attraction betwe5 ! mat]ial bodies is g5]at$ by ! *ange ( ! %ape ( ! space4 ,he is able to expla9 "s ph5om5a :i* _c be und]/ood bas$ on ! ,newton's gravity 7! precession ( ! planet ,m]cury1 e4g474 ,newton's me*anics cont9ues to make good pr$ictions on ,e>? & ne> space4 ,x is n *ang$ s9ce ov] #cjj ye>s4 #agdi ,,bc3 ,sign language ,?is is "o ( ! fir/ artificial languages 7a symbolic model74 ,x translates ! ,,gcl into ano!r language1 bas$ on signs & ge/ures4 #agha ,,bc3 ,immanuel ,kant ,kant 0 able to und]/& "s basic ?+s 9 association ) k1 b al?\gh he knew ,euclid's & ,newton's !ories 7symbolic models71 he 0 n able to und]/& ! means & me?ods ( a positive sci5ce4 ,he did n build any symbolic model4 ,9 8 books1 "o c f9d lots ( def9itions almo/ on any page1 b ,kant does n und]/& t su* def9itions _c be correlat$ 9 a logical way1 )\t ! frame ( a fundam5tal symbolic model4 #agia ,,bc3 ,napoleon ,,mdt consid]s t !re are two basic modes ( int]action betwe5 a bra9 & ! ext]nal reality3 to pr$ict ! evolution ( ! ext]nal reality 7,,zm-models7 & to act on ! ext]nal reality 7,,zam-models74 ,a w> c />t only if a big fraction ( ! population has almo/ ! same ,,zam1 & if t ,,zam is associat$ to w>4 ,w> c be associat$ ) an increase 9 ! level #b ( consci\sness ( ! population4 ,i mean1 :5 level-#b is high en\gh to believe t x w be bett] aft] a w>1 b no s high to und]/& t !re c\ld be "s o!r alt]native solution1 !n ! t5d5cy to w> c\ld really />t ! w>4 ,?is idea seems to be int]e/+ 9 expla9+ :y s _m p are s happy to g to w>1 & :y ?is t5d5cy is s p[]ful ev5 today 7e4g4 ,,ww#a & #b74 #ahcd ,,bc3 ,braille writ+ #ahcg ,,bc3 ,morse code #ahed ,,bc3 ,! symbolic logic ( ,george ,boole ,! facility to build & op]ate symbolic models increas$ to su* a level t ! bra9 0 n able anymore to keep ! models 9 m9d4 ,george ,boole inv5t$ a language to write symbolic models4 #ahei ,,bc3 ,*>les ,d>w9 ,d>w9's evolution !ory is n bas$ on a symbolic model4 ,x is r bas$ on ! sy/ematic ( "s prim>y data4 ,?us1 x is n a positive sci5ce & s1 its pr$iction c\ld be good only on %ort range4 #ahfg ,,bc3 ,das ,kapital by ,k>l ,m>x ,?is ab]ation s\nds good on image models4 ,! basic idea is t ! capitali/ takes ab\t all ! money & ! work+ class is =c$ to "w = peanuts4 ,! !ory 0 bas$ on "s image models1 :i* 7 und]/ood easily by ! population ( ^? times4 ,z we "k1 x is n possible to f9d ! "r importance ( an elem5t or relation%ip on an image model4 ,?us1 an image model c be tailor$ to prove any?+1 bas$ on ext]nal reality4 ,su* a me?od doesn't build a !ory1 b an ideology4 ,ord9>y p easily und]/& an ideology1 because x s\nds good1 & is able to answ] any "q4 ,:5 ,m>x's !ory appe>$1 ! control ( ! economy 0 bas$ on %ort range symbolic models4 ,s1 long-range problems 7 n pr$ict$4 ,! lack ( /ability ( ! society 9 t p]iod 0 an effect ( ?is problem4 ,lat]1 society advanc$ to take into acc\nt ! long-range problems too & s1 social-democratic movem5ts appe>$4 #ahgh ,,bc3 ,jehovah's ,witnesses ,9 "t1 z ! capacity to make & op]ate symbolic models increas$1 ! classical ,*ri/ian religion 0 "u pressure to *ange to meet ! new requirem5ts4 ,x result$ 9 re=m movem5ts 9 ! frame ( ! ,*ri/ian religion4 ,in/ead1 ,jehovah's ,witnesses make a new model />t+ f scrat*4 #aijj ,,bc3 ,max ,planck introduces ,quantum ,me*anics ,quantum ,me*anics is ! fir/ purely symbolic model associat$ to ext]nal reality4 ,su* a model is pure1 because x _c be translat$ or associat$ ) any image model4 ,?is is a v high /ep 9 ! evolution ( ! bra9 7level #e ( evolution74 ,bas$ on data1 x seems t ,max ,planck und]/ood f ! beg9n+ t 8 !ory 0 good1 b he 0 block$ by ! fact t imag9ation does n "w 9 und]/&+ x4 ,x seems t ,alb]t ,e9/e9 pu%$ him to publi% ! !ory4 ,quantum ,me*anics _c be translat$ to image models4 ,if someone =ces su* a translation1 ab]ations or logical contradictions occur4 ,! be/ kn[n problem is ! nature ( light4 ,quantum ,me*anics pr$icts t light is bo? wave & p>ticle4 ,?is situation _c be und]/ood bas$ on image models4 ,quantum ,me*anics pu%$ =w>d ! evolution ( society on a v high te*nological level 7e4g4 ! transi/ors & ! las]s are ! basic compon5ts to build comput]s74 #aije ,,bc3 ,alb]t ,e9/e91 ! !ory ( ! relativity ,e9/e9 />ts f ,euclid's ,geometry & ,newton's ,me*anics to make a new !ory1 to ext5d ! k to atomic & sub-atomic levels1 & to ! f> ,univ]se4 ,! m>riage betwe5 ,quantum ,me*anics & ! !ory ( ,relativity builds ! ma9 tool to und]/& sub-atomic ,univ]se4 ,?is new symbolic model 0 creat$ bas$ on a new ,geometry & "s new pr9ciples4 ,toge!r ) ,quantum ,me*anics1 ! ,!ory ( ! ,relativity spe$s up ! evolution ( society4 #aiad ,,bc3 ,! ,fir/ ,_w ,w> 7,! ,great ,w>7 #aiag ,,bc3 ,communism 9 ,russia ,communism is an ideology4 ,x is bas$ on an image model translat$ to "s %ort-range symbolic models4 ,! ma9 problem ( ! ,russian society ( t "t 0 a huge disp]sion betwe5 ! level ( und]/&+ ( ! ext]nal reality f "o p]son to ano!r4 ,ev5 worse1 ! level 0 l[ comp>$ to ,we/]n ,europe4 ,communism 0 only a fa/ solution to ! problem1 at lea/ on %ort-range4 ,( c\rse1 an inv>iant ideology c\ld be useful only on %ort-range4 ,z we "k1 ! communi/ sy/em cra%$ due to ! lack ( economic effici5cy1 b ! basic cause is associat$ to its inv>iance4 ,! problem ( ! disp]sion betwe5 individuals1 c\ntries or cultural zones cont9ues to be a big problem ( human society4 ,! problem has a t5d5cy to get worse & worse4 #aibh ,,bc3 ,walt ,disney ,z ! evolution to symbolic models spe$$ up1 ! bra9 also increas$ ! conceptualization level ( ! image models4 ,! c>toons are bas$ on su* concept image models4 ,ev]ybody 7includ+ *ildr5s7 easily und]/&s !m4 #aich3 ,_w ,w> #b ,bo? _w w>s />t+ 9 ,europe occur$ 9 a v complex set ( kn[n & unkn[n factors4 ,,mdt c be us$ to evaluate ! problem4 ,s9ce ,napoleon1 !re 0 a g5]al t5d5cy to w> 9 ,europe4 ,,mdt says t !re mu/ be a w>-associat$ ,,zam1 :i* mu/ be assimilat$ & accept$ by ! majority ( ! population4 ,also1 ! consci\sness level has to be high en\gh to ?9k t ! w> w solve all ! problems1 b n high en\gh to und]/& t ?is is n true4 ,"o example ( su* a ,,zam c\ld be we h bett] weapons or we are p[]ful en\gh to w94 ,( c\rse1 ! attack$ p h a ,,zam z we mu/ def5d our c\ntry4 ,x is possible t su* action models create conditions = a w>4 ,b1 su* models1 ev5 if !y are assimilat$ & accept$ by ! population1 are n en\gh to />t a w>4 ,!re mu/ be also a big en\gh numb] ( high-rank+ p]sons to plan su* a w>1 & a s]ies ( te*nical conditions4 ,ano!r factor1 :i* is associat$ ) ! w> />t w be describ$ bel[4 ,! p :o are 9 comm& are usually image-type p]sons1 b symbolic-type p]sons make ! weapons4 ,only symbolic-type p]sons are able to und]/& ! p[] ( su* weapons1 b su* p]sons are n 9 comm&4 ,once a w> />ts1 ! image-type lead]s lose ! control ( ! %ort & long-range consequ5ces4 ,= in/ance1 ! lead]s ( ! ,second ,_w ,w> und]/ood ! weapons1 bas$ on ! exp]i5ce ( ! weapons ( ! ,fir/ ,_w ,w>4 ,9 ! ,,ww#a ! tanks 7 exotic weapons & planes1 too4 ,v soon ! tanks & planes *ang$ totally ! mann] ( evolution ( a w>4 ,x 0 n possible to pr$ict ! de/ructions on su* a l>ge scale by ! ,,ww#a- type p]sons :o />t$ ,,ww#b4 ,?is problem cont9ues to exi/ ev5 n[4 ,9 "s less develop$ p>ts ( ! _w1 ! lead]s & soldi]s c\ld be image-type p]sons1 :o are n able to und]/& ! p[] ( ! weapons us$ by !m4 ,!y are also n able to make su* weapons4 ,= in/ance1 ! w> 9 ,rw&a produc$ a huge numb] ( victims4 ,! diff]5t gr\ps ( population f\ght ea* o!r s9ce ! beg9n+ ( hi/ory & x 0 n a big problem4 ,! problem occur$ :5 !y obta9$ advanc$ weapons )\t be+ !mselves advanc$ en\gh to und]/& _! p[]4 #aidh3 ,! ,cold ,w> ,communi/ p>anoia has sl[$ d[n "s nations to und]/& basic concepts z economic effici5cy4 ,communi/ lead]s h und]/ood ?is problem1 b ,communi/ ideology1 z any ideology1 _c be modifi$4 ,any *ange ( any ideology w di/roy x4 ,! app>5t reason :y ! ,communi/ sy/em cra%$ 0 a v l[ economic effici5cy4 ,! basic reason 0 ! increase ( ! level ( und]/&+ ( ! ext]nal reality bas$ on symbolic models by ! population4 #aigi444aiid3 ,! fundam5tali/ ,iran1 ,idi ,am9 9 ,ug&a1 fam9e 9 ,etiopia1 ,iran-,irak w>1 fam9e 9 ,somalia1 w> 9 ,rw&a4 ,!re are "s nations1 :i* _c evolve due to int]nal or ext]nal factors4 ,a sl[+ d[n ( ! evolution seems to be a g5]al t5d5cy 9 an important fraction ( ! _w4 ,a typical situation 0 9 ,somalia4 ,! facts are3 #a4 ,9 ,somalia 0 fam9e4 ,_m di$4 #b4 ,we/]n c\ntries 7,,usa includ$7 br\ght !m food4 #c4 ,:5 !y obta9$ en\gh food1 !y attack$ ! ,,u troops4 #d4 ,,usa left ,somalia v fa/4 #e4 ,we/]n c\ntries *ang$ _! basic pr9ciple life is ! supreme value to a new concept z we d n help ^? :o d n help !mselves too4 ,! fir/ consequ5ce ( ?is *ange 0 ignor+ ! situation f ,rw&a4 #aiic3 ,t]rori/ attack on ,,wtc 9 ,new ,york ,city #bjja3 ,ano!r deva/at+ t]rori/ attack on ,,wtc 7pass5g] airplanes cra%$ into ,,wtc74 ,individuals1 gr\ps or cultural zones :]e ! evolution bas$ on symbolic models is block$1 g5]ate t]rorism4 ,9 su* a situation1 fundam5tali/ action is expect$4 ,t is1 p turn back to image models4 ,z we "k1 x is n possible to "k ! importance ( an elem5t or a relation1 on an image model4 ,?us1 a p]son bas$ on image models only1 has a t5d5cy = p>anoia4 ,! logical argum5ts are n tak5 into acc\nt1 because ! logic is associat$ ) symbolic models only4 ,on ! o!r h&1 "s important cultural zones are spe$+ up _! advance bas$ on symbolic models4 ,!y ga9 m & m p[] due to ?is4 ,?is is ! ov]all situation n[4 ,ab/ract3 ! evolution ( ! bra9 means ! increas$ p[] ( ! symbolic models4 ,! ma9 /eps are3 #a4 ,spok5 language 7ab\t #adj ?\s&s ( ye>s ago7 #b4 ,phonetic writ+ 7#cgjj to #bijj ye>s ago7 #c4 ,euclid's ,geometry 7#bcjj ye>s ago7 #d4 ,newton ,me*anics 7#cdj ye>s ago7 #e4 ,quantum ,me*anics 7#ajj ye>s ago7 #f4 ,"s cultural zone spe$ up _! evolution bas$ on symbolic models1 b 9 o!r zones !re is a t5d5cy to turn back to image models 7fundam5tali/ t5d5cy74 ,"s fundam5tali/ t5d5cies occur 9 symbolic c\ntries too4 ,,eta #ah3 ,! organization ( ! human society ,fac$ ) ext]nal reality1 any individual builds & op]ates "s models to pr$ict ! evolution ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,! majority ( ! population is bas$ on image models4 ,"o ( ! organization pr9ciples ( ! human society is3 ,! majority is seldom "r4 ,?is pr9ciple is a direct consequ5ce ( reflect+ ! ext]nal reality bas$ on image models4 ,! evolution ( society means t !re is a dynamic 7a cont9u\s *ange 9 "t74 ,b1 z we already "k1 x is v h>d to *ange a /ructure ( models4 ,a second pr9ciple /ates t3 ,! p]sons :o are able to lead ! society mu/ be *ang$ f "t to "t1 ev5 if !y seem to be able to lead ! evolution process4 ,! fir/ pr9ciple says t a team ( symbolic qualifi$ p]sons %\ld elect ! lead+ p]sons1 & ! second pr9ciple says t su* p]sons mu/ be *ang$ f "t to "t4 ,! pres5t democratic society is bas$ on ^! pr9ciples1 z ,,mdt j expla9$ :y4 ,:5 9 a situation associat$ ) ! evolution ( ! society1 a decision has to be tak52 on image models1 ! decision is bas$ on feel+s1 or impressions1 or "s local models4 ,on a symbolic model1 su* a decision is bas$ on p>amet]s & _! associat$ values4 ,s1 ! importance ( e elem5t or relation%ip is controllable4 ,example3 !re is a law ( ! propagation ( errors 9 ma!matics4 ,x says h[ mu* ! result ( a =mula is *ang$ :5 a t]m is *ang$1 let's say1 e4g4 by #a4 ,! importance ( e elem5t or relation%ip is giv5 9 a v precise way4 ,9 future 7n 9 ! next #ej ye>s1 ,i guess71 !re w be a s+le symbolic model associat$ to ! society4 ,su* a model w be able to *>act]ize ! society 9 ! same way z ! me*anical _w is *>act]iz$ by ,newton's model4 ,bas$ on simulation1 x w be possible to pr$ict ! evolution ( ! society1 bas$ on "s basic decision4 ,! population w h to "k ^! pr$ictions & *oose "o or ano!r bas$ on its %ort-range & long-range int]e/4 ,x is suppos$ t 9 "s v advanc$ c\ntries su* models already exi/4 ,! ma9 problem is t ! political p>ties & ! population are on a g5]al evolution level t is too l[ = a symbolic und]/&+ ( ! society4 ,,eta #ai3 ,! s*izophr5ic-p>anoiac complex 7,,xspc74 ,,xspc is describ$ only associat$ to non-pa?ological s*izophr5ic p]sons 7,,xs#a-type74 ,bas$ on ,,mdt1 s*izophr5ia means a r$uc$ ability to build & op]ate long- range models4 ,,xs#a s*izophr5ia is a non-pa?ological =m1 :i* is associat$ ) ! activity ( a l>ge fraction ( ! population 9 a normal society4 ,p>anoia ,,xp means t !re is an ord9>y model 9 ! protection /ructure ( models4 ,su* an ,,ompsm =ces a p]son to di/ort ! importance ( ! prim>y facts to be accept$ by ,,ompsm4 ,?us1 an ,,xs#a-type p]son is n able to build long-range models1 b he_/%e is able to build %ort-range models4 ,! result is t su* a p]son has a l>ge numb] ( %ort-range models1 :i* are associat$ ) almo/ all ! features ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,a ,,xs#a p]son is able to integrate into a society1 (t5 9 v good positions4 ,s*izophr5ics c't build effici5t long-range models1 b c build v good %ort-range models4 ,! incapacity ( build+ long-range model means t !y h _m uncorrelat$ %ort-range models4 ,:5 !y are =c$ to c\ple_/correlate sev]al models1 z !y hav5't got ! capacity to d x1 !y w di/ort ! correlation betwe5 !m4 ,x happ5s 9 ! same way z = p>anoiac p]sons1 b = s*izophr5ics1 p>anoia is induc$ dynamically4 7,at diff]5t mom5ts1 !re are diff]5t di/ortions74 ,?is is ,,xspc4 ,! pres5t educational sy/em has ! t5d5cy to create s*izophr5ic p]sons ) ,,xspc symptoms4 ,,xspc is g5]at$ by ! classical educational sy/em1 :]e lessons are bas$ on elem5ts1 )\t insi/+ on ! relation%ip betwe5 elem5ts4 ,! capacity to make on "o's own su* correlation is n fav\r$ by ! educational sy/em4 ,z 9 s*ool ! con/ruction on long-range models is n taught1 ! p]sons w lose m & m ?is ability4 ,?us1 s*ool1 at all levels1 fav\rs ! occur5ce ( ,,xs#a;,b1 & also ,,xspc1 9 p]fectly sane *ildr54 ,?is *>act]izes s*ool all ov] ! _w4 ,application3 ,let's build ! full hi/ory ( ,europe1 = second>y s*ool level1 9 a normal lesson ( #ej m9utes4 ,! ma9 problem is to select :at is important & :at is n4 ,! normal solution is to make a long-range model & to decl>e x 9 an explicit =m4 ,su* a model w be able to select1 9 a coh]5t mode1 :at is important & :at n4 ,!re is a developm5t hi/ory ( ! human species 9 ?is book4 ,?is hi/ory is bas$ on a long-range model1 :i* says t all ! evolution ( ! human species is bas$ on ! cont9u\s increase ( ! p[] ( ! symbolic models4 ,?us1 ?is model is able to select :at is important & :at n4 ,"s p c\ld h o!r ideas4 ,!re is no problem4 ,!y mu/ decl>e _! long-range model & make ano!r hi/ory4 ,9 e situation1 !re w be a correlation betwe5 ! %ort-range models1 :i* are ! elem5ts ( ! long-range model4 ,?is is ! normal situation1 accord+ to ,,mdt4 ,conclusion3 ,,xs#a p]sons are bas$ on a l>ge collection ( %ort-range models1 :i* are built by direct int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,:5 su* p]sons are =c$ to connect "s models 9 betwe5 !m 7to cov] a l>g] section ( ! ext]nal reality71 !y are =c$ to connect su* indep5d5t models4 ,?is c be done only by ! di/orsion ( "s models to fit ) "o ano!r4 ,b1 ?is is simil> ) ! behavior ( a p>anoiac p]son4 ,?is is ,,xspc 7p>anoiac behavi\r due to a s*izophr5ic /ructure ( models74 ,,eta #bj3 ,induc$ p>anoia 7,,xip7 & p>anoiac-s*izophr5ic complex 7,,xpsc74 ,,xip affects normal p]sons :o are =c$ to use a basic model 9 e situation4 ,e4g4 ! memb]s ( ! ,communi/ p>ties are =c$ to accept t ! work+ class is ! lead] ( ! society4 ,?is model is n 9 ,,psm 7! p]son has no illness7 b1 !y are =c$ to use ?is model4 ,?is ext]nally-impos$ model det]m9es t any data f ext]nal reality %\ld be compatible ) ! ext]nally-impos$ model4 ,_! /ructure ( models evolves 9 a p>anoiac-type /ructure 7x is n possible to discuss freely ) su* p]sons74 ,a s(t =m ( ,,xip occurs 9 p t are repres5tatives ( a /ate in/itution4 ,= ! ,,xp p>anoiac p]sons 7!re is an ,,ompsm71 ! ext]nal data c\ld collide ) ! ,,ompsm4 ,! solution = !m is to di/ort any ext]nal in=mation to be compatible ) _! ,,ompsm4 ,b1 9 a complex /ructure ( ext]nal realities1 ?is me?od _c "w 7x is n possible anymore to build a h>monic_/logic /ructure ( models by di/orsion74 ,! only solution is to fragm5t ! data4 ,?is means t ! same facts f ext]nal reality h a diff]5t int]pretation dep5d+ on ! environm5t4 ,?is is ,,xpsc4 ,conclusion3 a p>anoiac /ructure ( models evolves to s*izophr5ia too1 z ! ext]nal reality is m & m complex4 ,,eta #ba3 ,di%>monies ( ! functions ( ! bra9 ,we "k f ! g5]al !ory t two basic modes ( int]actions betwe5 humans & ext]nal reality exi/4 ,! fir/ consi/s 9 obta9+ bett] & bett] models ( ! ext]nal reality 7,,zm74 ,! second is modify+ ext]nal reality bas$ on action models 7,,zam74 ,di%>monies are associat$ ) ! importance giv5 to ea* facility4 ,?us1 !re are two categories ( humans3 m k or m action ori5t$4 ,)\t action on ! ext]nal reality1 k is limit$4 ,on ! o!r h&1 p ) a r$uc$ k ( ! ext]nal reality c't build good quality models1 & s ! capacity ( action on ! ext]nal reality is limit$ or ineffici5t4 ,di%>monies are ?us det]m9$ by ! foll[+ factors3 - ! capacity to build models ( ! ext]nal reality - ! capacity to build action models - ! capacity to activate action models4 ,all ^! ?ree factors are 9 a v close int]dep5d5cy1 :atev] ! int]action betwe5 ! bra9 & ext]nal reality might be4 ,a di%>mony _c be associat$ ) a psy*ical or a pa?ological /atus4 ,! di%>monies contribute to :at we call p]sonality4 ,9 ?is *apt]1 we w talk ab\t p :o h no di%>monies4 ,! p]fect situation is ! case ( ^? :o build action models compatible ) ! models ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,^! p are ^? :o d n int5d to d m ?an !y are able to4 ,su* p w succe$ 9 all !y want to d4 ,!y are happy p4 ,h[ev] ! happy p h little contribution to ! progress ( society1 ev5 if !y contribute significantly to its /ability4 ,example3 ,a man wants to buy a v exp5sive c>4 ,lack+ money1 ! action model c't be activat$4 ,?is man is unhappy4 ,ano!r "o wants to buy a p5cil4 ,he succe$s to d x1 & z su*1 he is happy4 ,di%>monic p move society =w>d4 ,!y are ess5tially unhappy p4 ,if !y succe$ 9 ! end to d :at !y wi%$ =1 soon _! di%>monic /ructure w make !m build o!r action models :i* are n suitable to ext]nal reality & ! cycle re/>ts4 ,,eta#bb3 ,sublim9al messages ,:5 ext]nal reality *anges1 ! local ,,zm won't make good pr$ictions & ! bra9 w 9 consequ5ce look =_/build a new model suitable to ! new ext]nal reality4 ,h[ev] "s "t to react is ne$$4 ,9 ! case ( sublim9al messages we h an image :i* w produce a new ,m-model4 ,?is w h to activate a ,,zm-,,sl 7,,sl sublim9al71 b be=e ! activation ( ! new ,,zm-,,sl1 ! dom9ant ext]nal reality w reappe>1 :i* w imm$iately reactivate ! initial ,,zm4 ,?us ,,zm-,,sl has "t to be built1 b w n be activat$4 ,?is w h ! effect on a p]son z an idea or t5d5cy to some?+1 )\t an explicit reason4 ,( c\rse ^! ?\ghts influ5ce me?ods c create big disord]s 9 ! /ructure ( models ( a giv5 bra91 z "s half-elaborat$ models h to be integrat$ 9 ! normal /ructure ( models4 ,,zm-,,sl c become illegal models4 ,?is is :y sublim9al messages are =bidd51 at lea/ 9 adv]tis+1 all ov] ! _w4 ,,eta#bc3 ,h[ a positive sci5ce works ,a positive sci5ce is a symbolic model 7,,sm7 integrat$ 9 ,,gcl1 :i* is associat$ to an ext]nal reality4 ,let's expla9 ?is /atem5t4 #a4 ,! exi/5ce ( a fundam5tal symbolic model call$ ,g5]al ,communication ,language 7,,gcl7 is suppos$4 ,?is symbolic model conta9s absolutely all words1 toge!r ) _! def9itions4 ,! def9itions c be m or less precise1 logically consi/5t or n1 c be or n accept$ by "s or o!rs4 ,,gcl is ! common language =m$ spontane\sly betwe5 p 9 _! int]-relations along ! mill5iums4 #b4 ,we *oose a ^w 7t]m7 ,t f ,,gcl4 #c4 ,let's suppose t !re is a positive sci5ce ,,sm1 t c\ld include ! t]m ,t4 #d4 ,! t]m ,t1 t %\ld be /udi$ by ,,sm1 has to be includ$ 9 ,,sm4 ,= ?is purpose1 ,t has to be r$ef9$ )9 ! frame ( ,,sm4 ,,sm c integrate a new t]m only if ?is t]m is def9$ )9 ,,sm4 ,?us ,t w h "o def9ition 9 ,,gcl & ano!r g5]at$ by ,,sm4 ,example3 ,! t]m '=ce' has "o def9ition 9 ,,gcl & ano!r 9 ,newton's ,me*anics4 ,! pr$ictions ( ,newton's ,me*anics ref] only to ! t]m '=ce' z x _h be5 def9$ )9 ,newton's ,me*anics4 #e4 ,z soon z ,t has be5 includ$ 9 ,,sm1 ,,sm g5]ates ! relation%ips betwe5 ,t & o!r elem5ts1 & makes pr$ictions t include ,t4 ,^! pr$ictions c !n be comp>$ ) ext]nal reality4 #f4 ,if ! pr$ictions ( ,,sm relat$ to ,t prove to be acceptable1 !n ,,sm is consid]$ useful 9 und]/&+ ,t4 ,if ! pr$ictions are unacceptable1 !n ,,sm is inadequate 9 und]/&+ ,t4 ,9 nei!r case1 ,,sm c be consid]$ correct or incorrect4 #g4 ,any pr$iction connect$ to ,t has to be associat$ ) ! ,,sm :i* produc$ x4 ,example3 ,gravity is a supposition ( ,newton's !ory4 ,9 8 !ory gravity is a prop]ty ( ! mass ( a physical body4 ,9 ,e9/e9's !ory 7ano!r symbolic model71 gravity is a prop]ty ( space & mass4 ,bo? !ories give good pr$ictions 9 kn[n specific situations4 #h4 ,z ! pr$ictions ( ,,sm relat$ to ,t are prov$ acceptable1 ,,sm is consid]$ suitable 9 und]/&+ ,t & ?us1 ! pr$ictions ( ,,sm includ+ ,t c be associat$ ) ! t]m k4 ,k bas$ on an acceptable ,,sm is ! purpose ( any positive sci5ce4 ,we'll see n[ an extremely complex example4 ,we h int5tionally *os5 a t]m :i* practically has no def9ition 9 ,,gcl 7! def9itions is uncle>7 & has no associat$ direct data & facts f ! ext]nal reality4 ,! t]m *os5 is 'ali5' 7,,et74 ,to /udy )9 a positive sci5ce a t]m l ,,et seems impossible2 we w see t ?is is n s4 ,accord+ to ! logical s*ematic pres5t$1 we ne$ a symbolic model 7a positive sci5ce71 :i* 9 our example is ,,mdt itself4 ,g5]ation ( a def9ition ( ! t]m ,,et 9 ,,mdt means t we accept t ,e,ts h a bra9 & m1 _! bra9 works bas$ on ! same pr9ciple z ! human bra94 ,?is c be difficult to accept1 b indep5d5t ( ! us$ ,,sm 7,,mdt or ano!r71 ! situation is ! same3 ,,sm g5]ates ! def9ition ( ,,et1 :atev] ,,sm is1 & :atev] ! def9ition ( ,,et 9 ,,gcl might be4 ,we'll try to expla9 ,,et 9 ,,mdt4 ,let's activate ,,mdt ) ,,et includ$4 ,,mdt consid]s t ! basic functions ( ! bra9 are ! con/ruction ( image models ,i & symbolic models ,s4 ,let's def9e a human bra9 ,h ) ! p>amet]s ,i#a1 ,s#a4 ,x is v likely t ,,et w n h ! same p>amet]s4 ,let's suppose a model ( ,,et ) ! p>amet]s ,,et7#a1aj77! same capacity to build image models z humans1 b t5 times capacity to build symbolic models74 ,?is is j a possible example4 ,9 a complete analysis we ne$ to use a collection ( values 7,i1,s74 ,aft] hav+ *oos5 a pair 7,i1,s71 we />t op]at+ ,,mdt ) ,,et includ$4 ,we c ask a fir/ "q1 e4g4 h[ c ! int]action betwe5 a human ,h7#a1a7 & an ,,et7#a1aj7 look l8 ,:i* are ! t5d5cies ( ! ,,et8 ,d !y want to communicate1 d !y want to be fri5ds or enemies1 etc4 ,,mdt c't answ] ^! que/ions yet4 ,we ne$ to calibrate ! model4 ,calibration is done ask+ que/ions ) kn[n answ]s4 ,= in/ance1 a dog might be associat$ to ,d7#j4a1j7 7#aj ( ! capacity to op]ate image models comp>$ to a human & z]o capacity to op]ate symbolic models74 ,we h ! t5d5cy to communicate ) dogs & d n h an exag]at$ t5d5cy to ext]m9ate !m4 ,on ! o!r h&1 we h ! t5d5cy to ext]m9ate mosquitoes :i* h an extremely l[ ,i value & ,s#j4 ,we c g on ) calibration /udy+ ! int]action among humans4 ,= in/ance1 ! ,asiatic h cle>ly a high] ,i value ?an ! ,europeans1 & ! ,europeans h high] ,s4 ,once ! sy/em is someh[ calibrat$1 extrapolation to giv5 situations is possible4 ,bas$ on pr$iction1 we c evaluate :i* are ! limits = ,i & ,s = a fri5dly or unfri5dly int]action4 ,let's n =get t no pr$iction ( ! model c be v]ifi$ yet 9 int]action ) ext]nal reality4 ,h[ev]1 ! fact t we h a collection ( pr$ictions1 br+s u a huge advantage4 ,if "s facts f ext]nal reality c\ld be 9 ! range ( pr$ictions ( ! model1 we w be already prep>$ to int]pret !m 9 specific conditions4 ,?us1 "s facts c be expla9$ if ,,et _h a c]ta9 =mula4 ,anyways1 we already h a collection ( probable behavi\rs1 :i* repres5ts a big advantage1 :5 "s facts f ext]nal reality c\ld be expla9$ by ! exi/5ce ( ,,et4 ,we c g ev5 fur!r4 ,dep5d+ on ! =mula *os5 = ,,et1 models ( civilisation c\ld be built = ea* type ( ,,et4 ,aga91 ! model c be calibration bas$ on kn[n types ( human society1 includ+ ^? exi/+ 9 ! pa/1 & extrapolat+ to v>i\s =mulas = ,,et4 ,please rememb] t ev5 if ,,et exi/$ 9 ext]nal reality1 & ev5 if ,,mdt gave exact pr$ictions1 x does n result f "h 9 any way1 t ,,et h bra9s :i* function z ,,mdt consid]s4 ,a positive sci5ce only decl>es ! model & gives pr$ictions4 ,if1 bas$ on v]ify+ ! pr$ictions1 we get confid5ce 9 ! model1 !n ! model w be us$ 9 o!r simil> situations1 z useful4 ,nev] & ) no positive sci5ce d we expect t x w %[ u ! tru? or x w (f] gu>antees or c]ta9ties4 ,a positive sci5ce1 z we h %[n above1 makes pr$ictions4 ,if ! model makes good pr$ictions1 we w use x aga91 & t's all4 ,let's see ano!r possible direct practical application associat$ to ! above example4 ,we c\ld build models to tell u :at c\ld happ5 ) human society if ,s#b4 ,or1 :at w\ld happ5 if ! disp]sion 9 ,s increases too mu*4 ,?is means to f9d out1 = in/ance1 if a dang] exi/s = civilization if #ej ( humans h ,s#j4e & #ej h ,s#a4e4 ,p]spectives look fasc9at+6 ,,eta #bb3 ,direct demon/ration ( ! function to create image models ,! basic assumption ( ,,mdt is t ! bra9 builds & op]ates models automatically 7?is is a h>dw>e function74 ,an ex]cise is describ$ bel[ :i* demon/rates directly ?is basic assumption4 ,! absolute majority ( be+s 7human or animal7 h two eyes4 ,!y g5]ate two plane images b :at we see is a s+le tri-dim5sional image 7photographic-type image model7 9 accordance ) ,,mdt4 ,moreov]1 if we h a s+le plane image 7we look ) "o eye7 ! bra9 w cont9ue to build ! tri-dim5sional model4 ,b we h got a problem3 ) a s+le plane image we h n en\gh in=mation to build a tri-dim5sional image4 ,h[ev] we h a comp5sation3 ! bra9 is an extremely p[]ful sy/em4 ,x w use any k9d ( supplem5t>y in=mation to build fir/ a tri-dim5sional image & !n1 ! tri-dim5sional model4 ,9 ! foll[+1 we w describe an ex]cise = beg9n]s to demon/rate ?is4 ,we ne$ to wat* ,,tv ) a s+le eye 9 a room ) no additional light s\rce4 ,! glass surface ( ! scre5 has to be absolutely invisible 7!re %\ld be absolutely no reflection ( light on x74 ,we h to sit 9 front ( a normal scre5 at lea/ at #c met]s di/ance 7we %\ld n be able to see ! pixels :i* build up ! image74 ,! scre5 %\ld %[ a famili> picture1 f common ext]nal reality1 9 normal p]spective1 & ! image has to *ange sl[ly4 ,if1 "u ^! circum/ances1 we wat* ! scre5 ) "o eye1 aft] "s tra9+1 we w see a tri-dim5sional image4 ,?is exp]im5t proves directly t ! basic function ( ! bra9 is to make image models4 ,! g5]ation ( tri-dim5sional models by ! bra9 />t+ f a plane image is kn[n = a long "t4 ,?is appe>$ at ! same "t ) ! expansion ( art pa9t+ trade1 _m hundr$s ( ye>s ago4 ,?us1 a pa9t] us$ to pa9t fir/ ! =egr\nd1 & lat] ! backgr\nd4 ,a good pa9t] _h ! :ole tri-dim5sional model 9 8 head1 & ! backgr\nd connect$ p]fectly ) ! =egr\nd1 ev5 if ! backgr\nd 0 pa9t$ a lot lat]4 ,9 "s pa9t+s1 ! backgr\nd or "s compon5ts ( ! pa9t+ d n mat* p]fectly 7a poor pa9t]7 & ?is c\ld be notic$ by art exp]ts look+ at ! pa9t+ ) "o eye4 ,rembr&t pa9t$ sc5es ) gr\ps ( p4 ,h[ev]1 "s p 9 ! gr\p c\ld be clos] or f>!r f ! view]4 ,:5 su* a compact gr\p is wat*$ ) a s+le eye1 "o c notice t ! pa9t] _h pa9t$ !m correctly 7! p]sons f>!r out are slightly small]74 ,our bra9 c notice t9y diff]5ces1 because x recon/ructs ! #c-;,d model4 ,by ! way3 to build a #c;,d model bas$ on a s+le plane image is an op]ation :i* requires an imm5se capacity ( process+ ( in=mation4 ,9 spite ( its huge p[]1 ! bra9 has problems ) ! capacity ( process+ su* a huge am\nt ( in=mation4 ,z 9 pr9ciple !re is n en\gh in=mation = su* an op]ation1 ! bra9 has to guess "o or sev]al probable models1 :i* h to be v]ifi$4 ,f my direct exp]i5ce1 9 ord] to guess a #c;,d model f a plane image ones has to be 9 a v good physical & psy*ical %ape4 ,,eta #bc3 ,"s basic p>amet]s ( ! bra9 = measur+ p]=mance ,bas$ on ! fundam5tal !ory1 ,i h li/$ sev]al basic functional facilities ( ! bra91 exclusively z an introduction to ! problem evaluation4 #a4 ,! capacity to build & op]ate image models 7arts1 _m games1 p>anormal qualities4447 #b4 ,! capacity to build & op]ate symbolic models 7positive sci5ce1 te*nologies4447 #c4 ,! capacity to build & op]ate purely symbolic models 7,quantum ,me*anics4447 #d4 ,! capacity to integrate an image into a pre-exi/+ image model #e4 ,! capacity to translate an image model to ,,gcl 7description ( an image model7 #f4 ,! capacity to translate a symbolic model to ,,gcl 7! symbolic model is associat$ to a c]ta9 case1 translat$ to an image model & describ$ 9 words7 #g4 ,! capacity to translate an image model to a symbolic model 7g5]al abilities 9 sci5ce7 #h4 ,! capacity to translate a symbolic model to an image model #i4 ,! capacity to integrate symbolic in=mation into an image model #aj4 ,! capacity to build concept-type image models f a family ( image models #aa4 ,! capacity to build a concept-type symbolic model f a family ( symbolic models4 #ab4 ,! capacity to integrate symbolic in=mation into a symbolic model #ac4 ,! spe$ to build_/op]ate image models #ad4 ,! spe$ to build_/op]ate symbolic models #ae4 ,! spe$ to build long range image models #af4 ,! spe$ to build long range symbolic models #ag4 ,! spe$_/capacity to update preexi/+ models #ah4 ,! capacity_/spe$ to build %ield+ models #ai4 ,! capacity to build a new model 9 front ( a new ext]nal reality #bj4 ,! spe$ ( f9d+ a pre-exi/+ model suitable to a new ext]nal reality #ba4 ,! spe$ ( activation & deactivation by ,,mzm ( a preexi/+ model 9 front ( a *ang+ ext]nal reality4 ,?is implies bo? f9d+ ! suitable model & initializ+ x to ! giv5 ext]nal reality #bb4 ,! capacity to op]ate 9 "t-%>+ sev]al models 9 front ( a complex ext]nal reality ,?is li/ c cont9ue1 z ! bra9 is extremely complex4 ,= in/ance3 ,endurance p>amet]s 7e4g4 ! quality ( ! te*nological implem5tation71 dynamical p>amet]s 7e4g4 ! spe$ & /ability ( ! op]ations1 h[ fa/ "o c swit* f "o op]ation to ano!r 9 transi5t & /ation>y mode74 ,9 ! g5]al !ory1 ! bra9 appe>s z hav+ two basic facilities3 to build & op]ate ,,zm models associat$ to ext]nal reality1 & to act on ! ext]nal reality1 bas$ on a ,,zam model4 ,! facility ( action on ! ext]nal reality has a numb] ( p>amet]s1 />t+ f build+ ,,zam suitable to ! ext]nal reality & end+ ) ! capacity ( activation ( ! action models4 ,?is possible li/ ( p>amet]s is f> f *>act]iz+ completely ! bra94 ,f ?is we c see ! naivete & ridicule ( ! pres5t s-call$ intellig5ce te/s4 ,^! te/s are ridicul\s1 because !re is no fundam5tal !ory1 :i* c\ld at lea/ def9e & correlate ! us$ t]ms4 ,my !ory says t !re are facilities associat$ to image & to symbolic models 7!re are arts & sci5ces1 wat*es are analog or digital1 on comput] scre5s we h icons & text etc47 ,we also h facilities associat$ ) obta9+ in=mation f ! ext]nal reality & facilities associat$ ) modify+ ! ext]nal reality4 ,a m9imum obs]vation ( ! ext]nal reality sugge/s f\r indep5d5t gr\ps ( ,,iq te/s3 action_/k on image_/symbolic models4 ,z ?is is n ! case1 ! pres5t ,,iq te/s are naive & ridicul\s1 n only f ! po9t ( view ( ,,mdt4 ,9 ! foll[+ we w give a /ructure ( fundam5tal ,,iq te/s bas$ on ,,mdt3 #a4 ,! capacity to build ,m image models #b4 ,! capacity to build ,,ym image models 7concept models7 #c4 ,! capacity to assimilate image ,,ym #d4 ,! capacity to build symbolic ,,ym #e4 ,! capacity to assimilate symbolic ,,ym #f4 ,! capacity to assimilate image ,,zm #g4 ,! capacity to build image ,,zm #h4 ,! capacity to assimilate symbolic ,,zm #i4 ,! capacity to build symbolic ,,zm #aj4 ,! capacity to assimilate symbolic ,,zam #aa4 ,! capacity to build symbolic ,,zam #ab4 ,! capacity to assimilate image ,,zam #ac4 ,! capacity to build image ,,zam #ad4 ,! capacity to activate symbolic ,,zam #ae4 ,! capacity to activate image ,,zam #af4 ,! capacity to build image ,,azm #ag4 ,! capacity to activate image ,,azm ,example3 ,= a p]son :o has to be a public relations repres5tative = a bus9ess1 ! qualities :i* w c\nt1 on fir/ place1 are ! capacity to assimilate symbolic &_/or image models & to act bas$ on !m4 ,he has to h a r$uc$ t5d5cy to build own models1 9 ord] to be fit to ! requirem5ts ( ! position4 ,a p]son :o w "w 9 sci5tific rese>* has to h capabilities to create new symbolic models4 ,among ^! capabilities1 int]dep5d5ce %\ld exi/4 ,we c suppose t p]sons :o h ! t5d5cy to build models w h difficulties to assimilate ext]nal models4 ,_! t5d5cy w be to modify any ext]nal model 9 a p]sonal mann]4 ,at ! same "t a p]son ) capabilities ( assimilation ( ext]nal models1 w h diffculties 9 build+ own new models1 & w n try to modify ! assimilat$ models1 ev5 if !y are n suitable to ! ext]nal reality anymore4 ,o!r p>amet]s associat$ to ! bra9 are connect$ ) ! /ability ( ^! capabilities1 on long_/ %ort t]m1 & 9 normal or extreme conditions4 ,^! p>amet]s w *>actrize ! reliability ( ^! capabilities 9 special conditions4 ,bas$ on ?is !ory & fur!r "w1 a collection ( human types w be possibly e/abli%$ z a li/ ( num]ical p>amt]s4 ,z soon z a p]son is consid]$ to belong to a specific type1 he_/%e w "k t 8_/h] *ances to socially integrate are big1 if he_/%e w pursue ! doma9 :]e he_/%e has adequate qualities4 ,! above examples are only z an illu/ration ( ! capabilities ( ,,mdt 9 ?is field4 ,a fundam5tal !ory z ,,mdt _c be us$ directly to solve specific problems4 ,x creates a basis & a ref]5tial sy/em1 :]e specific problems associat$ ) "s sections ( ! extr5al reality c be solv$4 ,,eta #bd3 ,animals ,bees ,a basic *>act]i/ic ( a bee is its flight beyond its visual limit4 ,x c fly "s hundr$s ( met]s f ! beehive1 :ile x c id5tify objects only )+ a few met]s di/ance4 ,9 consequ5ce1 ! bee mu/ navigate4 ,navigation means1 9 pr9ciple1 ! exi/5ce ( a map1 compass & ( a dynamical sy/em ( f9d+ ! actual position on ! map4 ,if we c make only suppositions ab\t ! compass & ! dynamical position+ sy/em1 z to ! map1 we f9d ourselves 9 ! action zone ( ! !ory4 ,a map is an image model4 ,! bra9 builds simplifi$ models 7maps7 ( ! ext]nal reality1 m>k+ ! position ( ! beehive & ! position ( ! bee 9 flight & updat+ t all ! "t4 ,:5 a "y bee comes out ( ! beehive1 x w />t fly+ ar\nd x1 9 wid] & wid] circles1 b only on cle> days4 ,! explanation bas$ on ! !ory is t1 9 ?is flight1 ! bee is calibrat+ its navigation sy/em4 ,?is means t x calculates its position relative to ! beehive & comp>es ! pr$iction ) ext]nal reality1 z giv5 by direct view4 ,:5 ! in/rum5ts ( navigation are calibrat$1 x c fly beyond ! limit ( direct visibility1 & return successfully bas$ on ! pr$ictions ( its map model4 ,migratory birds ,9 ! case ( migratory birds1 we h aga9 a navigation problem4 ,?is "t ! flight is done at ?\s&s ( kilomet]s di/ance4 ,x is cle> t ! migratory birds %\ld h a map add$ to ! navigation in/rum5ts4 ,! birds %\ld h 9 memory a successful /ory-type model 7map7 ( ! want$ r\te4 ,! bird w comp>e ! want$ position 7giv5 by ! /ory-type model7 ) ! real position4 ,! real position c\ld be f\nd e4g4 by foll[+ ! magnetic field ( ! ,e>?1 by obs]v+ ! position ( cosmic bodies 7,sun1 ,moon1 & />s74 ,x is cle> t any supplem5t>y in=mation is welcome & add$ to ! /ory-type model1 to su/a9 a successful op]ation4 ,! navigation /ory-type model has be5 built bas$ on a previ\s successful flight4 ,a bird1 :i* has n ?is model1 c\ld record x1 if x is a memb] ( a flock 9 :i* at lea/ "o bird has ?is model4 ,h[ev]1 if a bird1 :i* has n yet ! navigation map1 has te*nical problems 9 flight1 x c\ld be lo/4 ,examples are kn[n ( migratory birds1 :i* hav+ te*nical flight-problems1 7 ev5tually tak5 into c>e by p4 ,aft] heal+1 !y did n want to leave anymore4 ,! !ory expla9s ?is by ! fact t )\t a map & _! position on ! map1 !y don't "k :]e to g4 ,h[ev]1 if !y see a flock 9 flight1 !y might foll[ t flock4 ,!re is a situation report$ by ! m$ia1 :5 a :ole flock lo/ its navigation map & rema9$ /r&$4 ,9 ?is situation1 a plane resembl+ a bird 0 us$ to guide ! flock4 ,cats ,cats c communicate to "s ext5t ) humans4 ,ano!r *>act]i/ic is t a cat h>dly adapts to an environm5t aft] gett+ us$ to ano!r4 ,a h\se cat is jumpy at s\nds to :i* x %\ld be famili>4 ,:5 a cat is di/urb$1 x is v likely t ,,psm 0 activat$4 ,at fir/ sight1 cats h a bra9 ) a r$uc$ capacity to build new models4 ,at ! same "t1 due to a weak in/9ct ( def5d+ its t]ritory 7"s cats accept mice ar\nd !m71 "o c suppose t ! cat's model ( ! t]ritory is v primitive4 ,! mo/ probable situation is t a cat c build new models only :5 v "y4 ,aft] "s "t x looses ! capacity to build long-range models & uses ma9ly %ort-range models1 guid$ by primitive long-range models & _m solutions bas$ on ! action ( ,,psm4 ,9 fact1 all pr$ators hav+ few enemies h ! t5d5cy to use m %ort- range effici5t models1 ?an long-range models4 ,?us1 intellig5ce1 :i* is an indicator ( ! capacity to build & op]ate long-range models1 is n /imulat$ 9 pr$ators4 ,animal intellig5ce is /imulat$ by ! pres5ce & int]action ) humans1 & also by an aggresive environm5t4 ,x is important to note t 9 spite ( ! fact t ! lack ( ext]nal dang] is n a /imulus to develop ! functions ( ! bra91 ! pot5tial ( ! pr$ators bra9 is relatively high4 ,?is is :y1 ev5 if pr$ators d n look too intellig5t1 !y c surprise u 9 critical situations4 ,dogs ,dogs seem to build v precise models ( ! ext]nal reality1 includ+ s5s+ ! mood ( ! ma/]4 ,_! relatively high capacity to build models1 gives !m a possibility to communicate bas$ on ^! models1 includ+ ) humans4 ,let's analize n[ a situation1 z x 0 reportd 9 ! newpap]s4 ,a %eph]d 0 walk+ ) 8 dog 9 ! =e/4 ,a "m be> ) cubs attack$ him4 ,! be> attack$ ! %eph]d1 b ! dog attack$ ! cubs4 ,! be> left ! %eph]d1 to save its cubs4 ,! !ory c expla9 ?is behavi\r 9 sev]al ways4 ,a fir/ possibility is t ! ma/] is integrat$ 9 ! dog's ,,psm4 ,! dog builds a def5ce model ( ! ma/]1 :i*1 at ! simulation ( ! be> attack1 fails to f9d a successful solution4 ,simulat+ ! attack ( ! cubs1 ! pr$iction appe>s t ! be> w save ! cubs & =get ab\t ! %eph]d4 ,?is explanation is cle>ly a sign ( intellig5ce 7long-range model74 ,x is a bit too complex = a dog 7x is ev5 surpris+ ev5 = humans74 ,ano!r v>iant is t aft] ! model to attack ! be> fail$1 ! dog attack$ ! cubs because x 0 less dang]\s4 ,?is means t ! ma/] 0 n 9 ! ,,psm4 ,ano!r v>iant exi/s 9 :i* ! dog has p>ticipat$ previ\sly 9 an attack ( sev]al dogs aga9/ a "m-be>1 & 9 t attack1 x saw t ! be> runs ) ! cubs :5 ! cubs are attack$4 ,?is v>iant aga9 does n consid] ! %eph]d4 ,?is seems to be ! mo/ probable explanation4 ,ano!r v>iant exi/s 9 :i* ! %eph]d is n consid]$1 & ! dog attacks any?+ weak] ?an itself4 ,let's cont9ue ! analysis ( dogs4 ,x is kn[n t dogs are v fai?ful to _! ma/]4 ,?is sugge/s t !y c introduce ! ma/] into _! ,,psm4 ,h[ev]1 ! fact t "s dogs c be fai?ful to sev]al ma/]s 7successively7 sugge/s t !y c rewrite ! ,,psm4 ,?is is really unusual4 ,! fact t dogs introduce ! ma/] 9 ! ,,psm is cle>ly demon/rat$ by ! obs]vation t "s dogs die to save _! ma/] 7!y are n afraid ( dea?74 ,accord+ to ! !ory1 ?is c happ5 only if ! ma/]s are on ! same priority level ) _! own be+4 ,!re are fights ) dogs1 :5 dogs fight to dea?4 ,x is int]e/+ to see if ! motivation c or c't be giv5 by a protection model ( ! ma/]1 or by an in/9ct1 :i* does n take ! ma/] into acc\nt4 ,! elephant ,! bra9 ( ! elephant c\ld be bigg] ?an ! human bra94 ,f ?is foll[s t its organization is primitive4 ,a way to expla9 ?is is ! r$uc$ capacity ( ! elephant bra9 to build concept models4 ,if ?is is true1 he uses a huge capacity ( ! bra9 to build pure image models4 ,! t]m elephant memory c be associat$ ) ?is feature4 ,?us1 if x built concept model1 ! elephant %\ld be able to id5tify only limit$ l&m>ks ( ! places x passes by4 ,us+ pure image models1 x memorizes ea* tree & ea* bran*4 ,?is is a totally ineffici5t mode ( bra9 function+4 ,monkeys ,exp]im5ts %[ t1 9 a controll$ environm5t1 "s monkeys build & op]ate "s primitive symbolic models4 ,!y might implem5t ?is function by s(tw>e1 bas$ on image models4 ,h[ev]1 ^! v s+ul> examples prove _! incapacity to evolve t[>ds a symbolic model1 9 fact4 ,"o ( ! mo/ /rik+ *>act]i/ics ( ^! animals is _! lack ( /ability 9 a model4 ,! mo/ intellig5t monkeys are ^? :i* h ! capacity to /ay 9 a model1 :5 ! ext]nal reality gives !m _m opportunities to *ange ! active model4 ,if ! monkeys _h /ability 9 a model1 !n !y c\ld h bett] p]=mance at build+ symbolic models1 "u ! human control4 ,9 spite ( ! fact t ,,mdt does n su/a9 ! evolution ( man f monkey1 ! behavi\r resemblance ( monkeys & humans1 on image models ( c\rse1 is /rik+4 ,! dolph9 ,! dolph9 is consid]$ a v intellig5t animal1 next aft] humans4 ,! dolph9 c n only immitate ! signs made by humans b !y c integrate !m into a l>g] context4 ,= in/ance1 :5 ! ge/ures ( ! tra9] sugge/ a jump foll[$ by a salute1 ! dolph9 und]/&s t x has to jump1 & !n1 to greet ! public4 ,h[ev]1 ev5 if dolph9s seem to und]/& easily ge/ures1 !y d n seem to h abilities to associate an action to a symbolic message4 ,! dolph9 builds easily normal long-range models1 n only /ory-type models z "s o!r animals4 ,at ! same "t1 !y c\ld rea* ev5 level #b ( conci\sness1 if x c\ld be prov5 t !y build _! own correlation models ) ! gr\p to :i* !y belong 7z x seems to be ! case = captive dolph9s74 ,note3 _m species ( animals hunt 9 packs4 ,usually1 ! model ( correlation is situat$ 9 ,,psm4 ,! sup]iority ( an animal is giv5 by ! capacity to build its own correlation model ) ! pack or ) o!r be+s1 human or animals1 7level #b ( consci\sness74 ,x is n easy to see ?is ess5tial diff]5ce1 z ! app>5t behavi\r c be ! same4 ,! !ory does n exclude ! possibility ( level #b consci\sness1 on image models 7( c\rse7 = ! dolph9s4 ,?is w\ld mean e4g4 t a dolph9 anticipates ! action ( ano!r & w act 9 advance1 bas$ on pr$iction1 9 ! frame ( a normal model1 impos$ by ! tra9] 7n a model ( ! ,,psm1 z ! ones associat$ to in/9cts74 ,!re c\ld be "s difficulties to und]/& :at happ5s1 due to ! reason %[n 9 ! note above4 ,"s o!r ?+s result f ! !ory4 ,?us1 ! basic *>act]i/ic ( ! environm5t :]e ! dolph9 lives1 is ! lack ( l&m>ks4 ,:atev] ! capacity ( int]action ) ext]nal reality is1 ! dolph9 9 ! ocean _c build models ( ! environm5t 9 :i* x lives1 due to ! lack ( l&m>ks4 ,x c't m>k ! t]ritory to use m>ks 9 build+ models ( ! t]ritory4 ,ev5 if x might make maps ( ! magnetic field ( ! ,e>?1 ^! maps are n precise en\gh to h good l&m>ks4 ,ev5 if x _h precise l&m>ks 7ne> ! coa/l9e71 !y c\ld be us$ only = local navigation4 ,us+ ! t]m9ology ( my !ory1 "o c\ld say t ! dolph9 has s*izophr5ia induc$ by ! environm5t4 ,captivity %\ld increase ! level ( intellig5ce ( ! dolph9s1 due to an environm5t ) l&m>ks4 ,^! c /imulate x to use its bra9 to a high] capacity clos] to its !oretical possibilities4 ,h[ev]1 exp]im5ts up to date d n %[ abilities to build symbolic models1 z 9 ! case ( "s monkeys1 ev5 if on image models1 dolph9 bra9 seems to be v advanc$ = an animal4 ,obs]vations ab\t ! limit$ survival ( dolph9s 9 captivity c be relat$ to ! fact1 t1 9 captivity1 !y build v fa/ ! exact model ( ! space available4 ,aft] a :ile 7see /ress7 ! space is kn[n v well & ?is c\ld be a cause ( /ress4 ,a /rong bra9 ne$s always new in=mation4 ,! solution c\ld be a l>g] environm5t1 9 :i*1 additionally1 ! configuration %\ld be *ang$ e n[ & !n4 ,contr>y to g5]al belief1 animals1 includ+ dolph9s1 %\ld feel bett] 9 int]action ) man 9 a controll$ environm5t1 9 ! above conditions1 ?an 9 lib]ty4 ,! %>k ,! %>k has ! same environm5tal problems z ! dolph94 ,x behavi\r is s primitive t1 bas$ on ! !ory1 x %\ld h only ,,psm1 ) extremely few models1 giv5 by ! int]action ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,wat] seems to be a relatively ho/ile environm5t = ! developm5t ( ! intellig5ce4 ,! :ale ,! :ale c navigate at ?\s&s ( kilomet]s ( op5 see & return to its />t po9t4 ,x is also kn[n t !y seem to communicate by s\nds simil> to a song4 ,x is believ$ ab\t :ales t !y c use ! magnetic field ( ! bottom ( ! ocean to build a map 7image model74 ,if s1 !y c\ld f9d _! position on ?is primitive map4 ,h[ev]1 if ?is map becomes incorrect1 due to *anges ( ! magnetic field1 !y c\ld navigate 9 a wrong direction1 includ+ l&+ on ocean %ores4 ,moreov]1 if tak5 back to ! op5 see1 !y w repeat ! pa? t lead !m to tr\ble1 because _! navigation sy/em indicates ! same direction z be=e4 ,simply1 ! :ales get lo/1 & h no means to f9d aga9 _! position 9 ! ocean4 ,we c take a risk & say t1 if ! in=mation ( navigation associat$ ) ! magnetic field 7 record$ 9 a /ory-type model 7equival5t to a map71 !n ! :ale w\ld "k h[ to return to ! />t+ po9t by rew9d+ ! tape4 ,?us1 x has to comp>e ! /ory-type model ) ,,ir g5]at$ by ! direct int]action ) ext]nal reality4 ,if ?is is ! me?od1 a transf] ( ?is it9]>y model f a :ale c\ld be possible to ano!r1 :i* did n make ?is trip yet1 ?r\gh t song4 ,seems fasc9at+1 b also x is possible to *eck by exp]im5t4 ,,eta #be3 ,v complicat$ op]ations on image models 7walk1 jumps1 climb+ trees7 ( humans ,we w apply ! !ory to see ! exact way ( walk+1 jump+ & tree climb+ at humans4 ,9 accordance to ,,mdt1 an action on ! ext]nal reality 7e4g4 walk+7 implies ! exi/5ce ( a long-range action model 7,,zam74 ,?is model g5]ates ! approximate plan ( ! action4 ,,zam w build & activate a numb] ( local models 7,,zam & ,,azm7 to rea* its goals4 ,a local ,,zam w simulate ! movem5t ( ! leg = ! fir/ /ep4 ,if ! simulat$ /ep is successful1 !n ,,zam w activate ! action on ! ext]nal reality4 ,! leg w move 9 ! same way z ! leg 'mov$' dur+ ! simulation4 ,x is n possible to d any movem5t1 if x _h n be5 successfully simulat$ be=e4 ,let's see ! case ( jump+4 ,9 front ( an ob/acle1 :i* has to be jump$ ov]1 ! bra9 w 'execute' a simulat$ jump4 ,if ! simulat$ jump succe$s1 x c be done 9 ! ext]nal reality z well1 activat+ ! model1 :i* did ! simulat$ successful jump4 ,if ! simulation does n succe$1 !re w be no model to activate ! muscles ( ! body1 & ! be+ w be block$ to act4 ,any attempt to g aga9/ ! int]nal decisison w fail4 ,! conclusion f ! previ\s analysis is t a m or less elaborate simulation prec$es any action on ! ext]nal reality4 ,! result is t an extremely complicat$ activity1 l e4g4 walk+1 is execut$ ) rem>kable precision & elegance4 ,at fir/ sight1 walk+ seems to be a relatively simple activity4 ,at a clos] analysis1 "o c see extreme complexity4 ,! fir/ problem is keep+ ! equilibrium dur+ walk+4 ,! /ability ( humans & animals dur+ walk+ is a dynamical /ability4 ,?is means t1 if we froze ! body 9 an int]m$iate position1 ! body w\ld n be /able & w\ld fall4 ,dur+ walk+1 ! models anticipate ! movem5ts ( ! body ?r\gh simulation & s5d suitable comm&s 9 advance4 ,if !re 0 no anticipation ( ! evolution & we c\nt$ only on ! /ability & position s5sors1 ! in=mation w\ld get delay$ to ! device tak+ ! decision & su*1 ! sy/em w\ld h a r$uc$ /ability4 ,?is is h[ all ! electronic /abiliz] sy/ems "w3 !y wait = some?+ to happ5 to make a correction4 ,9 ! case ( ! bra91 ! in=mation f ! /ability & position s5sors is us$ to anticipate ! possible future problems & act be=e ! problem aris$4 ,?is is ! dynamical /ability &1 ,i ?9k1 ?is problem _c be solv$ 9 real "t by any exi/+ comput] due to ! l[ p[] ( ! pres5t comput]s4 ,f "h we c see ! huge capacity ( in=mation process+ ( any bra91 />t+ ) mammals4 ,! mo/ primitive mammals1 ) bra9s ( a few grams or t5s ( grams1 are able ( high] p]=mance ?an humans1 9 runn+ & jump+4 ,we %\ld ?9k ( ! fact t1 = walk+1 a correlation ( hundr$s or ?\s&s ( muscul>s fib]s is ne$$4 ,dynamically1 i4e4 dep5d+ on ! specifics ( any individual movem5t1 on ! previ\s behavi\r1 on ! anticipat$ behavi\r1 on ! goal to be atta9$ & on ! v>i\s ext]nal p]turbations1 all ^! fibres w be activat$_/deactivat$ 9 a precise ord]1 ea* ) ! suitable int5sity to solve ! giv5 problem4 ,at any mom5t ! problems :i* c\ld appe> are anticipat$ & ! corrections are made1 be=e ! problems occur4 ,! numb] ( models 7:i* are built or activat$71 associat$ ) ?is type ( activity1 c be t5s or hundr$s 9 a second4 ,example3 ,! work+ spe$ ( a model ,relat$ to anticipation by simulation on a model1 ,i h se5 a photo ( a baseball play] t 0 try+ to cat* a fa/ ball 9 flight4 ,! high-spe$ photo %[$ ! ball fly+ directly into ! glove ( ! play]4 ,! s5sational 9 ?is picture is t ! eyes 7 look+ at ! place :]e ! ball _h be5 "s "t be=e4 ,! model = cat*+ ! ball has anticipat$ ! position ( ! ball bas$ on ! previ\s in=mation com+ f ! eyes4 ,! action 0 a success1 ev5 if ! eyes 7 unable to give ! real "t in=mation1 & 9 spite ( ! fact t ! h& c n move v fa/4 ,?is example illu/rates ! huge advantage ( ! con/ruction & op]ation ( models4 ,! effective spe$ ( action c be consid]ably high] ?an ! intr9sic spe$ ( action ( ! compon5ts4 ,hik]s :o g on difficult treks ) heavy backpaks1 :i* *ange slightly _! position1 "k t hik+ c be done ) exceptional /ability4 ,p]sonally1 ! imm5se capacities ( ! bra9 to process in=mation1 & ! spe$ ( execution ( ^! incr$ibly complicat$ op]ations1 h always amaz$ me4 ,associat$ ) ! above issue1 ,i _h a situation on a trek1 c>ry+ a heavy backpack1 :5 a /one slipp$ f "u my foot & ,i fell4 ,! active models 7 n able to anticipate ?is possibility4 ,9 ?is case1 ! capacity to build a new model suitable to ! ext]nal reality is r$uc$4 ,z we "k1 ,,psm is activat$ in/ead4 ,h[ev]1 ,i am /ill amaz$ t ,i 0 n hurt dur+ t fall 7x 0 practically a controll$ fall1 b outside my consci\sness74 ,usually1 ,,psm tries to save :at c be /ill sav$1 & x is ev5 possible1 t x w accept sacrific+ an arm1 to save :at is m important4 ,connect$ ) ?is specific problem1 !re is also ano!r v>iant t a p>allel model to ! ma9 model ( walk+ 0 creat$4 ,?is p>allel model pr$ict$ t ! /one w slip & built a sav+ model outside ! l9e ( ! ,,psm4 ,h[ev] ! !ory pr$icts only two l9es3 "o ( ! ,,psm & "o ( ! ,,zam :i* controls ! global activity4 ,possibly1 ! ,,zm c\ld let ! ma9 ,,zam act1 & build 9 p>allel o!r ,z,a,ms models = new situations1 :i* w\ld be activat$ 9 special cases4 ,?is type ( behavi\r is n specifically exclud$ by ! !ory1 b 9 reality x is n met suffici5tly cle>ly1 s t x c be su/a9$4 ,build+ a p>allel model is an easy op]ation1 b ! "q is1 h[ does ! ma9 ,,zm "k :at o!r ,,zam to activate1 :5 ! active ,,zam does n correspond anymore4 ,! implem5tation ( ?is facility c\ld be done if !re 7 a 'pipel9e' built by ! ma9 ,,zm1 s t a specific ord] ( activation ( p>allel ,z,a,ms exi/$ 9 special cases4 ,b ?is w\ld imply ! exi/5ce ( a new h>dw>e4 ,z ,i already said1 ! exi/5ce ( ?is facility 7pipel9e ( ,z,a,ms7 _c be su/a9$ yet1 due to insuffici5t data1 b c\ld be a l9e ( fur!r h>dw>e developm5t ( ! bra94 ,! issue ( walk+1 jump+ & runn+ is inimag9ably complicat$ & ,i d n believe t 9 pr$ictible future1 robots w come close to ! p]=mance ( a *ick5 a few days old1 runn+ on a difficult t]ra94 ,climb+ trees is an ev5 m complicat$ activity1 ?an walk+ & jump+4 ,! basic in=mation is relat$ to ! lack ( precise in=mation ab\t ! resi/ance ( ! bran*es4 ,! models are able to make an evaluation ( ! resi/ance ( ea* bran*1 b ! model w h en\gh simulations 9 :i* ! bran* w break4 ,,zm w ne$ to take ?is into acc\nt1 bas$ on v>i\s local models1 9 ord] to build a good /rategy 7! be/ ,,zam reactualis$ v (t574 ,9 ?is case1 ! /ability 9 ! tree w be giv5 by ! capacity ( build+ alt]native models1 :i* c\ld be activat$1 if a bran* broke4 ,! bra9 ef=t ne$$ to ensure ! /ability ( ! p]son 9 a tree is huge4 ,n all bra9s h ?is capacity4 ,moreov] ! ,,zm %\ld also build a 'sav+' model1 9 :i* !re %\ld be at lea/ ?ree po9ts ( support at any mom5t1 9 ! ideea t if at lea/ two w behave z 9 ! simulation1 ! sy/em w h an acceptable level ( /ability4 ,walk+ on a difficult t]ra91 jump+ & ! /ability 9 tree climb+ are te/s1 :i* c %[ global p]=mance ( humans 9 ! doma9 ( image models4 ,9 animals ^! functions c be ev5 m effici5t4 ,,eta #bf3 ,! bra9 evolves "u our eyes4 ,g5]ally all ,e,t,as ref] to ! behavi\r & evolution ( ! bra9 ( a normal av]age human4 ,9 #aijj ,quantum ,me*anics appe>$4 ,x m>ks ! highe/ level atta9$ up to n[1 9 ! bra9 evolution4 ,h[ev]1 p1 :o rea*$ ?is extreme advance ( k1 are ord9>y p 9 ev]yday life4 ,indep5d5t ( ! level 9 ! pr(essional field1 9 ev]yday life1 ! bra9 cont9ues to act to a l>ge ext5ds bas$ on image models4 ,i h an example1 9 :i* "o c see cle>ly1 & above any d\bt1 ! evolution ( ! bra9 t[>ds m & m advanc$ symbolic models1 at ! level ( ! common p]son1 9 an issue always associat$ ) image models3 nutrition4 ,9 all times1 p h eat5 bas$ on analysis on image models4 ,associat$ t]ms to nutrition are ta/e1 smell1 col\r1 aspect etc4 ,! decision to eat or n a c]ta9 food1 is bas$ on image models4 ,x c be said t ! :ole be+1 ) its :ole /ructure1 p>ticipates at solv+ ! nutrition problem4 ,we h an explicit situation1 :5 ! process ( evolution t[>ds symbolic models 9 nutrition is cle>4 ,i h se5 a p]son 9 a %op1 :o want$ to buy a c]ta9 product4 ,! p]son _h at h& a li/ ( dang]\s food additives 7! s-call$ ,es74 ,a product 0 reject$ because x conta9$ su* an ,e4 ,ta/e1 smell1 aspect & natural drive 7 ov]run & a logical decision tak51 totally indep5d5t ( any image model4 ,es _c be s5s$ bas$ on image models4 ,:5 a decision is tak5 exclusively on symbolic models1 we h cle>ly a progress4 ,?is ph5om5on1 accord+ to ,,mdt1 w increase on all levels4 ,important note3 ! elite has impos$ t any food %\ld be label$ ) ! exact cont5ts & o!r data1 s t evolv$ p c take _! own decision4 ,?is type ( in=mation is useless = ! image-type public4 ,! real problem is n ! in=mation1 b ! te*nical capacity ( ! bra9 to collect in=mation & decide bas$ on symbolic models4 ,z ,i m5tion$1 ! attitude ( ! majority ( consum]s cont9ues to be /rongly an*or$ 9 a complex /ructure ( image models4 ,!re is an inf9ite numb] ( cases1 9 :i* ! image models f "o's m9d1 make ! products m exp5sive1 & also m dang]\s4 ,example3 good quality butt] might conta9 a sub/ance1 :i* conf]s x a ,yell[ comm]cial col\r4 ,betwe5 butt] ) colorant & ! same )\t x1 _m consum]s *oose ! "o ) col\r4 ,!re are sev]al s(t dr9ks 7"s v fam\s7 :i*1 )\t colorants1 w\ld h less success4 ,! bra9 foll[s its asc5d+ c\rse t[>ds ! increase importance ( symbolic models1 s t1 z we h se5 x already happ5+1 ! decision 9 nutrition w be tak5 ) m & m contribution f symbolic models4 ,! gu>antee exi/s on symbolic model1 t1 )9 ! laws & ! level atta9$ by sci5ce & te*nology & ! laws ( economy1 food is possibly ! safe/4 ,nutritional regulations c only impose :at a c]ta9 product may n conta94 ,! evolution ( ! bra9 is1 h[ev]1 sl[ on ! scale ( human active life1 ev5 if ! evolution accel]ates4 ,we are on a level developm5t ( ! bra9 on :i*1 9 doma9s :]e image models 7 lead+ 7e4g4 nutrition71 symbolic models are ga9+ gr\nd4 ,,eta #bg3 ,pr9cipial negative effects associat$ ) ! function+ ( a bra9 #a4 ,!re is a pr9cipial problem1 :5 we ask a "q4 ,9 ord] to h an und]/&able answ]1 we ne$ to be )9 ! model :i* g5]ates ! answ]4 ,)\t ?is condition1 ! answ] w be nons5se4 ,to put x diff]5tly3 n any "q is p]mitt$4 ,example3 ,! nature ( light c be und]/ood only )9 ! framework ( ,quantum ,me*anics4 ,if we are n famili> ) ,quantum ,me*anics1 ! answ] to ! "q ab\t ! nature ( light is nons5se4 ,f outside ,quantum ,me*anics1 light seems to be bo? wave & p>ticle1 & ?is /atem5t _c be und]/ood bas$ on logic4 ,9 case ( *ildr51 ! que/ions 9 ! class :y448 _c g5]ally h any answ]1 z ! *ildr5 hav5't got ! suitable models4 ,h[ev] p>5ts h an answ] to any ( ! *ildr5's que/ions4 ,! answ] ) ! /ork br++ ! babies is fam\s4 ,! educational sy/em %\ld take into acc\nt ^! issues4 ,= in/ance ! ':y' que/ions %\ld n be enc\rag$1 & fav\r ! :at is ?is8 type que/ions4 ,?is means t1 = *ildr51 p>5ts %\ld %[ !m ! elem5ts associat$ ) ext]nal reality & _! relation_/int]connections4 ,*ildr5 w build alone models & !y w f9d !mselves ! answ]s to ! que/ions ( ':y' type4 #b4 ,:5 y c't d :at y want1 y d :at y c444 ,"h we op5 ,p&ora's box4 ,9 ! majority ( cases 9 ev]yday life1 we _c d :at we want or we c't turn back "t aft] a failure4 ,^! problems c g5]ate build+ & activation ( illogical action models />t+ ) rev5ge & resignation z individual acts1 & end+ ) w>s4 ,! reason is associat$ ) ! t5d5cy ( any model to evolve t[>ds /ability1 9 ! conditions :5 ! model _c /abilize 9 any situation4 ,= in/ance1 by rev5ge1 9 a way or ano!r1 "o c f9d a /ability ( ! model1 by atta*+ to x ano!r model 7?is model is a %ield+ model74 ,resignation means build+ a suitable %ield+-type model associat$ to ! model ) problems4 ,! mo/ important & well-kn[n %ield+ model1 associat$ to resignation1 is religion4 ,all %ield+ models are associat$ ) ! t]m 'illusion'4 ,! illusion is def9$ z ! reality g5]at$ by a %ield+ model4 ,! education sy/em %\ld take into acc\nt ^! classes ( problems & f9d solutions to avoid !m4 #c4 ,if an action model has be5 built1 x c\ld be activat$1 indep5d5t ( respect+ or n ! social or moral laws4 ,f ,,mdt1 we "k t ,,psm conta9s a s]ies ( models impos$ by education1 :i* block c]ta9 models to activate4 ,if ! suitable models 9 ,,psm are miss+1 or if !re are suitable %ield+ models1 !re are no limits 9 activat+ ! mo/ incr$ible models4 #d4 ,translation ( an image model into a collection ( symbolic models to su/a9 an undecl>$ image model4 ,?is syndrome is recognis$ f ! simple & imp]ative logic1 b also f ! incapacity ( ! p]son to h a dialogue1 bas$ on logical data & /atem5ts4 ,on symbolic model1 ?is problem does n occur1 due to multiple cross-*ecks betwe5 elem5ts & relations4 ,,eta #bh3 ,free-,masonry ,we />t ?is !oretical discussion by build+ a local model4 ,! ma9 /atem5ts ( ! local model are3 #a4 ,! intellectual sup]iority ( a p]son is giv5 by 8_/h] capacity to build & op]ate long-range models4 #b4 ,! activity ( ! long-range models _c exce$ ! lifetime ( ! p]son4 #c4 ,!re are /rong t5d5cies to prolong ! action ( long range models beyond ! limit ( 8_/h] physical life4 ,if a p]son wants t c]ta9 long-range models be active beyond ! limit ( "o's lifetime1 "o possibility is to activate su* models )9 an organisation4 ,h[ev] if we want a model to rea* its goals 91 let's say #ajj ye>s1 ! organisation %\ld be a v special "o4 ,?is condition is fulfill$ e4g4 by free-masonry4 ,be=e go+ on1 ,i want to po9t out t ,i h no direct in=mation_/ k on any masonic organisation4 ,! discussion is bas$ exclusively on !oretical consid]ations1 z !y result f ,,mdt1 & ! local model pres5t$ above4 ,moreov]1 = ! discussion1 ! inn] k ( a masonic organisation w\ld n br+ any useful in=mation4 ,accord+ ) ! !ory1 ! organisation %\ld rea* its goals beyond ! limit ( lifetimes ( its memb]s1 & z su*1 ! ord9>y masons are g5]ally unaw>e = :at !y are fight+4 ,a v g5]al /atem5t is ne$$ "h4 ,?us1 a !ory 7any !ory67 makes a pr$iction4 ,9 ?is specific case1 ,,mdt pr$icts ! exi/5ce ( a special organisation4 ,!n we try to f9d 9 ! ext]nal reality some?+ t corresponds to ! def9ition4 ,?us ! fact t ,i attribute to masonry ! def9ition g5]at$ by ! !ory1 does n mean t ?is is complete1 & 9 accordance ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,! masonry 9 ! ext]nal reality c\ld h "s *>act]i/ics 9 accordance ) ! !ory1 b x might h o!r *>act]i/ics1 :i* h n be5 acc\nt$ = by ! !ory4 ,?is means t ! !ory c pr$ict only ! exi/5ce ( a g5]al /ructure1 & s1 x is possible t1 9 ! ext]nal reality1 "o c f9d sev]al types ( organisations1 :i* 9 spite ( respect+ ! def9ition1 c h /ructures & compon5ts n pr$ict$ by ! !ory4 ,?is situation is an extremely g5]al "o 9 all positive sci5ces & occurs e "t :5 a !ory is confront$ ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,let's g on ) ! description ( a masonic organisation bas$ on ,,mdt4 ,usually1 ord9>y memb]s h no idea on ! exact situation1 & :at !y are fight+ =4 ,?is happ5s due to ! fact t masonry acts extremely sl[ly1 modell+ p f a spiritual po9t ( view4 ,?us1 :5 some?+ happ5s1 ?is w happ5 because ! intellectuality has already ! 'natural' t5d5cy to act 9 a c]ta9 direction1 & because ! 'natural' t5d5cy ( ! majority ( p w be 9 ! same direction or w n oppose x1 at lea/4 ,?us1 ! masonic me?ods are v diff]5t f ! classical me?ods ( education1 or f ! political ones4 ,! /ates also want to p]suade p to act 9 a c]ta9 direction1 by propag&a or education4 ,h[ev]1 ! political goals are %ort-t]m initiatives 7at mo/ a few legislative t]ms71 :ile ! masonry wants basic *anges 9 ! ?9k+ /ructure ( p1 indep5d5t ( ! political ori5tation ( ea* memb]4 ,z ,i h already /at$1 ! goals ( masonry are to be atta9$ 9 sev]al g5]ations4 ,?is is :y an ord9>y memb] ( masonry _c detect ! goals1 :i* h to be atta9$4 ,9 ?is situation1 masonry %\ld be 9 v good relation%ip ) any political & economical =ces1 indep5d5t ( _! ori5tation4 ,x also results f "h t ! masonry w nev] campaign 9 any way 7political or o!r7 = any p]son 7inside or outside its ranks7 & g5]ally = any political ori5tation4 ,mo/ masonic organisations w n accept political or religi\s discussion inside !m1 9 accordance ) _! goals4 ,political discussions are associat$ ) %ort-range models comp>$ to ! masonic goals1 & ! religi\s discussion are nons5se1 z religion is bas$ on inv>iant %ield+ models4 ,masonic organisations are bas$ only on individual p]sonalities1 indep5d5t ( _! ori5tation4 ,?is is :y ^! organisations h ! t5d5cy to p]secute ! weak memb]s1 or ^? :o wi% ! support ( ! organisation 9 _! individual int]e/4 ,! reason is cle>3 ! masons h to be /rong p]sonalities1 to be able to influ5ce effici5tly ! o!rs4 ,masonry %\ld be m complex ?an x 0 %[n "h1 z somebody has to build & activate su* v long-range complex models4 ,at ! same "t1 ! exi/5ce ( sev]al corellat$ or uncorrelat$ masonic organisations is n =bidd54 ,let's see ! pr$ictions ( ! !ory connect$ ) ! future ( masonry4 ,= ?is1 we w rem9d ! basic problems ( ! _w1 9 g5]al1 z ,,mdt pr$icts !m4 ,x#a3 ,! _w is pu%$ =w>d by symbolic nations1 :ile m & m nations _c ma9ta9 ! pace & h fundam5tali/ t5d5cies4 ,x#b3 ,inside a symbolic society1 l>g] & l>g] gr\ps ( p :o _c keep ! pace ) ! symbolic ori5tation appe>4 ,^! take refuge 9 fundam5talisms 7antiglobalisation1 ecological1 religi\s movem5ts1 etc74 ,x#c3 ,x looks l !re is a degradation ( ! te*nical quality ( individuals1 already at bir?1 especially 9 ! symbolic c\ntries4 ,x#d3 ,_m p]sons f image c\ntries h v good symbolic ori5tation & are accept$ & desir$ 9 ! symbolic worlds4 ,h[ev]1 ^! p]sons d n h a /ructure ( basic models compatible ) ! symbolic _w1 z !y are com+ f an image _w1 & ?us1 !y _c contribute to ! /r5g!n+ ( ! /ructures ( ! symbolic-type societies4 ,let's see n[ "s possible problems to :i* masonry is oblig$ to react4 ,let's take e4g4 ,x#a4 ,on long t]m1 x c\ld cause a break up ( ! _w4 ,"p ( ! _w %\ld become a ghetto4 ,if ?is happ5$1 !n masonry w\ld h ! t5d5cy to control ?is process1 :i* is consid]$ z inevitable4 ,if ghetto-isation ( ! _w 7 consid]$ inacceptable1 masonry %\ld f9d & implem5t a solution exclud+ x4 ,discussion associat$ ) ,x#a444,x#d %\ld f9alize 9 long-range models1 bas$ on :i* masonry %\ld act4 ,we c see f "h t masonry is ! only organisation1 :i* c\ld "w ) ?is class ( problems4 ,/ates h too %ort-range models & above all1 ! repres5tatives ( ! /ates are n preoccupi$ by su* basic problems4 ,z ! classes ( problems ( types ,x#a444,x#d are extremely complicat$ :5 associat$ to specific ext]nal realities1 ! pr$iction is t masonry has s]i\s difficulties connect$ to its own /ructure ( p]sonnel1 z well z ) ! ways ( action 9 future4 ,x c also be suppos$ t pres5tly "s memb]s ( ! masonry c\ld n accept anymore t "s goals are atta9$ beyond _! lifetime limit4 ,if a l>ge en\gh fraction ( ! masons ?9k ?is1 !n ! "* ( masonry w *ange4 ,let's see a class ( problems we c\ld gr\p "u ! "n ,irak syndrome4 ,?is is ab\t ! fact t image c\ntries d n adopt & respect ! democratic-type /ructure1 z x is und]/ood 9 ! symbolic c\ntries4 ,?is w\ld n be big deal1 if ^! c\ntries 7 poor4 ,if !y h natural res\rces = sale1 ^? c\ntries might be tempt$ to act dang]\sly = o!r c\ntries1 z !re is no public control on :at is happ5+4 ,^! c\ntries may become1 at ! limit1 a dang] = human civilization4 ,?is class ( problems is f> beyond ! capacities & goals ( classical masonry4 ,h[ev]1 z ?is syndrome w exi/1 = long "t f n[1 masonry w h to act someh[ to keep ! connection ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,,eta #bi3 ,problems associat$ ) movie mak+ ,i h se5 on ,,tv a sc5e pres5t+ a vehicle ent]+ a /reet4 ,! sc5e />ts ) a g5]al view ( ! /reet4 ,! vehicle ent]s ! sc5e f left to "r4 ,dur+ ! sequ5ce1 two p]sons appe> 9 ! =egr\nd :o wat* ! movem5t ( ! vehicle4 ,! problem is t ! eyes ( ^? p]sons foll[ 7we suppose7 ! vehicle1 mov+ f "r to left4 ,if ! op]ator _h n *ang$ position1 ! eyes ( ! p]sons %\ld h mov$ f left to "r1 z pr$ict$ by ! g5]al model1 creat$ dur+ ! previ\s sc5e4 ,let's see :at happ5$4 ,! vehicle 0 record$ ent]+ ! sc5e f left to "r1 !n ! op]ator cross$ ! /reet & took "s images ( two p]sons wat*+ ! vehicle1 & mov+ _! eyes f "r to left4 ,?is c produce confusion 9 ! con/ruction ( ! model4 ,9 a m complicat$ situation1 ! pres5t$ data w\ld h be5 confus+ & w\ld be und]/ood 9 fragm5ts1 /imulat+ ! s*izophr5ic t5d5cies4 ,x is rem9d$ t1 :5 ! in=mation _c be correlat$1 ! bra9 w swit* f ! con/ruction ( a normal model to a /ory-type "o4 ,?is is n an insignificant problem4 ,if ! scope ( ! pres5tation 7 transmission ( in=mation to help build a model associat$ to ! record$ ext]nal reality1 o!r rules to %oot a movie w\ld exi/1 :i* %\ld be diff]5t f ! ones us$ n[adays4 ,p d n seem to be di/urb$ by ?is class ( problems4 ,!y might be di/urb$ only if !y want to recon/ruct ! normal model bas$ on spread data4 ,9 ?is case ,i consid] x z a =m ( induc$ s*izophr5ia 7,,xs#a;,b71 z cle>ly correlat$ ev5ts are pres5t$ z unconnect$4 ,?us1 9 a movie1 z local models appe> 9 a succession1 !y are relat$ inbetwe5 ea* o!r1 9 ! frame ( a /ory-type model1 in/ead ( be5 us$ to create a s+le normal model1 associat$ to a unique ext]nal reality4 ,! p]ception bas$ on /ory-type models is a primitive way ( und]/&+ ! ext]nal reality1 & x is un=tunately a typical way ( ! normal man 9 ! civiliz$ _w4 ,und]/&+ ?is problem conta9s implicitely ! solution4 ,( c\rse1 education 9 s*ool w h an important role4 ,?is problem 7reflection ( ext]nal reality 9 /ory-type models7 appe>$ z an effect ( ov]:elm+ ! bra94 ,:at happ5$ is an avalan*e effect3 ! pres5tation ( a situation is confus+ &1 z su*1 ! bra9 builds a /ory-type model4 ,! /ructure ( /ory-type models is consum+ a lot ( res\rces ( ! bra9 & det]m9es m & m limit$ allocation ( res\rces to build+ o!r normal models4 ,! r$uc$ capacity to build normal models causes t normal pres5tations are n detect$ & appreciat$ anymore4 ,ev5 if ! pres5tations 7 normal1 x w\ld be p]ceiv$ ?r\gh /ory-type models & s ! circle is clos$4 ,reflect+ ! ext]nal reality 9 ! =m ( /ory-type models is a special k9d ( fundam5talism4 ,?is conclusion %\ld worry ev]ybody4 ,! solution %\ld be a /rict control on ! =m ( spread+ ! in=mation1 s t in=mation c\ld only be pres5t$ )9 ! g5]al frame decl>$ at ! beg9+4 ,?us1 any specific in=mation w be integrat$ 9 ! g5]al model4 ,?is is :at is already happ5+ 9 positive sci5ces1 :ile1 e4g4 9 newpap]s1 in=mation is pres5t$ )\t any connection to ! pa/1 )\t any pr$iction ( ! future evolutions & ev5 )\t pres5t+ ! context 9 :i* ! in=mation %\ld be integrat$4 ,,eta #cj3 ,optical p]spective & ! quality ( con/ruction ( image models4 ,! succes 9 con/ruct+ image models 9 ! case ( photography & movies dep5ds on ! optical p]spective ( ! objects4 ,! p]spective is giv5 by ! angle "u :i* "o c see ! subjects4 ,?is angle is giv5 by ! ratio ( ! maximum dim5sion ( ! image to ! focal di/ance ( ! l5s4 ,example3 = #cemm cam]as 7us$ typically7 ! #ej mm focal di/ance 0 f\nd to give ! same p]spective z ! eye4 ,x is important to "k t 9 ord] to recon/ruct correctly a #c;,d model1 ! p]spective has to be ! normal once z ! eye is calibrat$ = its normal p]spective4 ,?is means t ,,ym models h be5 already built & record$ bas$ on ! normal p]spective4 ,if ! p]spective is *ang$1 ! ,m-models w n f9d ! correct position ( ! ,y,ms4 ,?us1 ! ,y,ms h to be modifi$ & ?is is an extremely complicat$ op]ation4 ,9 ?is case ! bra9 pref]s to build fragm5t$ ,,zm models 7sev]al ,z,ms associat$ to pieces ( ! prim>y ,m-model74 ,?is also c\ld favorize a =m ( induc$ s*izophr5ia 7,,xs#a;,b74 ,?is problem appe>s e4g4 :5 we wat* a sc5e record$ 9 a place :]e we h be5 be=e & :i* we "k4 ,if ! p]spective is n normal1 x is possible t we d n recognize1 or recognize only ) great difficulties1 "s elem5ts & sequ5ces :i* we %\ld recognize easily4 ,,eta #ca3 ,"s times aggressivity may fight ,,xs#a-type s*izophr5ia4 ,! aggressivity is def9$ z a /rong] ?an av]age t5d5cy to activate ,,zam models4 ,an aggressive p]son has ! t5d5cy to easily activate models t act on ! ext]nal reality4 ,let's see "s typical situation 9 common ext]nal reality4 ,example #a3 ,p :o g to sup]m>kets h easily noticeable s*izophr5ic t5d5cies dur+ %opp+4 ,?is is und]/&able4 ,ea* product se5 w activate at lea/ "o model1 s1 9 a %ort "t1 ! bra9 is ov]:elm$ by ! multitude ( models activat$ at ! simple id5tification ( ! entities ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,!y ne$ to correlate1 9 addition1 ! (f] 7price1 quality447 ) _! 7usually7 limit$ f9ancial res\rces4 ,! ef=t ( ! bra9 is v big1 s t little en]gy is left to take into acc\nt ! surr\nd+ p4 ,^? :o are 9 a hurry 7h precise models to execute7 w p]ceive ! ones ov]:elm$ by ! problem z sleep+1 block+ ! fl[4 ,h[ev]1 z we h se51 s*izophr5ic t5d5cies are1 up to a po9t1 und]/&able4 ,! local-s*izophr5ia giv5 by a ma9 problem :i* preocupies too mu* ! bra9 c\ld be f\ght by ! aggressivity ( ! o!rs 7if x exi/$74 ,:51 = in/ance1 ! o!rs di/urb too mu* or too (t5 ! sleepy 7z 9 ! sup]m>ket example7 ! latt] w be =c$ to r$irect "p ( _! res\rces to respond to ! _m ext]nal p]turbations4 ,to d ?is1 !y ne$ e4g4 to build sev]al concept 7simplifi$7 models = ! products1 & ?is is evolution 7ev]y?+ non- ess5tial is disc>d$74 ,?us1 ! aggressivity ( ! o!rs c fight local-s*izophr5ia z x has be5 describ$ above4 ,if en\gh p w be aggressive ) ^? atta9$ by local s*izophr5ia1 ! result w be t ! %opp]s w h m precise ideas & w decide fa/]4 ,anyways1 an aggressive environm5t w att5uate to disappe>ance local-s*izophr5ia ) b5eficial effects on ev]ybody4 ,example #b3 ! same type ( local 7tempor>y7 s*izophr5ia appe>s :5 driv+ 9 busy city traffic4 ,_m w be ov]:elm$ & w react sl[ly ) excessive caution & ?is w upset ! o!r aggressive driv]s4 ,if !re are en\gh aggressive driv]s1 or if ! law fav\rs ^? driv]s1 !n ! sleepy w be ei!r self-remov$ f traffic1 or !y w jo9 ! t5d5cy to aggressive driv+4 ,! effect w\ld be an increase 9 flu5cy & hopefully few] accid5ts4 ,connect$ to ?is p>adox 7aggressivity dim9i%+ ! numb] ( accid5ts7 ! pros c\ld be3 ! sleepy upset ! aggressive4 ,! aggressive c\ld ?us produce accid5ts4 ,if ! sleepy w dissape>1 ! risk ( accid5t w be decreas+ significantly because ( less s\rces ( irritation4 ,if ! sleepy w vani% f traffic ! occasions ( ! aggressive to %[ aggressivity w decrease4 ,?is c be expla9$ by ! fact t1 if ! "o 9 front ( me kn[s t ,i am aggressive1 he w n risk to drive lazy4 ,also1 if ,i h an aggressive driv] beh9d me1 ,i w n risk to be aggress$1 s ,i w drive m dynamically1 )\t hesitation4 ,! result is n only m flu5cy b also ! dim9i%+ ( ! effect ( aggressivity4 ,we h %[n h[ ,,xs#a-type s*izophr5ia c\ld be f\ght by aggressivity1 if ! law fav\r$ aggressivity e4g4 ,let's see ! rev]se4 ,a s*izophr5ic population reacts sl[ly & bas$ on too %ort-range models to ! p]man5t p]turbation associat$ ) ev]yday life4 ,! dynamic individuals w be disc\rag$ by an in]t society & s !y w contribute to ! g5]al bad /atus ( ! society4 ,,eta #cb3 ,sex ,,mdt consid]s t !re is no pr9cipial diff]5ce betwe5 male & female bra9s4 ,! diff]5ces appe> only relat$ to ! te*nological implem5tation ( ! be+s1 9 g5]al4 ,f ! g5]al !ory we "k t "o ( ! basic design requirem5ts ( ! be+s is to survive unconditionally =ev]4 ,?is requirem5t is ! goal ( sev]al image models ( ! ,,psm4 ,9 ! te*nological implem5tation kn[n1 ! liv+ be+s h a limit$ lifetime & ! above condition is complet$ by reproduction4 ,fulfill+ 9 optimal conditions ! reproduction 9 ! animal _w means ! selection ( ! be/ individuals = reproduction & block+ ! reproduction ( ! less p]=mant1 bas$ on ! available image models 9 ,,psm4 ,! models associat$ to sexual activities are 9 ,,psm &1 ( c\rse1 !y are image models4 ,9 case ( humans1 we rememb] t image models h dom9at$ life until ab\t ye> #ahjj1 aft] :i* symbolic models h begun a /rong asc5sion4 ,z a consequ5ce1 sexuality1 up to #ahjj1 0 bas$ exclusively on image models 7= ! av]age p]son only71 :ile aft] #ahjj1 sexuality 0 influ5c$1 m & m1 by symbolic models 7bas$ on logical analysis74 ,= humans1 z bas$ initially on image models1 sexuality modell$ ! man v diff]5tly f woman4 ,x %\ld be not$ "h t ! t]m ,man means = ! majority ( u a man 7male71 :i* is n correct4 ,! explanation = ?is confusion resides 9 ! dom9ant position ( ! man 9 a society bas$ on image models4 ,reluctantly leav+ beh9d ! cultural environm5t bas$ on image models1 pres5t sexual life is /rongly influ5c$ by symbolic models4 ,9 a symbolic model environm5t1 !re is no sexual diff]5ce4 ,?is c\ld be express$ by say+ t1 9 a symbolic society1 !re are no discrim9ations bas$ on sex4 ,all humans1 indep5d5t ( be+ male or female are equal1 because ?is results f ! analysis on symbolic model4 ,z already said1 sexuality is associat$ ) image models1 & *ang+ ! /ructure ( basic models1 f image to symbolic1 has produc$ /rong p]turbations 9 ! approa* to sex4 ,9 ! pres5t te*nological implem5tation ( humans1 ! dom9ant position ( ! man is evid5t4 ,?is is ! s\rce ( ! pres5t crisis ( sexuality4 ,a woman1 kn[+ t %e is equal or1 _m times1 ev5 sup]ior to ! male p>tn]1 w h difficulties 9 implem5t+ h] sexual life4 ,due to ?is problem1 ! numb] ( non-usual sexual behavi\r is high4 ,9 ?is approa* ( evaluation ( ! problem1 we w talk only ab\t ! normal situation1 i4e4 ! situation :i* %\ld be dom9ant 9 sexual issues 9 a society dom9at$ by symbolic models4 ,bo? m5 & wom5 h to build a /ructure ( symbolic models1 9 :i* ! models explicitly relat$ to sex 7image models7 %\ld be controll$ bas$ on logic4 ,! basic /atem5ts ( ?is symbolic model %\ld be ! foll[+3 #a4 ,!re is a p]fect equality betwe5 m5 & wom51 includ+ ! explicit sexual int]action4 #b4 ,fai?fulness to a s+le p>tn] is n an important feature 9 a /ructure dom9at$ by symbolic models4 ,on image models1 fai?fulness to a s+le p>tn]1 only = humans1 is necess>y & results implicitly f ! way ( *oos+ ! p>tn] 7pure love444 i4e4 ! p>t5] is includ$ 9 ! ,,psm z an image model74 #c4 ,sexual attraction c be /rongly disc\rag$ by ! exi/5ce ( a pr$iction t describes exactly :at is go+ to happ5 dur+ an explicit sexual int]action4 ,f "h results t a 'symbolic c\ple' ne$s to inv5t1 if possible1 ev]yday new ways ( sexual int]action4 ,also1 :5 r\t9e appe>s 7! pr$iction is confirm$ too precisely71 ! c\ple breaks-up to avoid unsolvable /resses4 ,^! ?+s c be already met 9 ! _w we live 91 especially 9 ! mo/ 'symbolic' c\ntries 7! mo/ advanc$ f ! economic1 te*nical & sci5tific po9t ( view74 ,! !ory pr$icts ! cont9u+ *anges ( our sexual 'ways' bas$ on ! g5]al %ift f image to symbolic models4 ,h[ev]1 due to fundam5tali/ reactions 7rejection ( symbolic models ( a l>ge fraction ( ! population71 ! sexual life ( ^? atta9$ by fundam5talism is affect$4 ,= 'symbolic' p1 sexual activity c contribute to ev]yday happ9ess only if ! p>tn]s are on ! same level ( 'symbolic' developm5t4 ,!re is a problem associat$ ) ! actual phase ( bra9 developm5t associat$ ) sexual activity4 ,?us1 sev]al in/9cts are includ$ 9 ,,psm1 :i* are associat$ ) sexual behavi\r1 too4 ,^! in/9cts w block = in/ance ! t5d5cies t[>ds homosexuality1 ince/ & p$ophily4 ,! evolution ( ! bra9 to symbolic models results also 9 ! r$uction 9 importance ( ! in/9cts ) negative consequ5ces1 at lea/ 9 a transi5t phase4 ,?us1 ! spe$ ( dim9i%+ ! importance ( in/9cts is diff]5t f ! spe$ ( evolution t[>ds symbolic models4 ,! protection /ructure bas$ on symbolic models w\ld pr$ict ! long-t]m effects ( a sexual decision4 ,:5 a pr$iction %[s a negative effect1 ! decision is to avoid su* activities4 ,?is me?od %\ld replace ! me?od bas$ on in/9cts situat$ 9 ! ,,psm4 ,at ?is po9t1 we are 9 a relatively dang]\s transi5t phase4 ,! protection /ructure bas$ on symbolic models is n implem5t$ yet1 :ile ! protection sy/em bas$ on ! in/9cts is less & less effici5t4 ,on v long range 7i4e4 ov] hundr$ ye>s f n[7 ! :ole protection /ructure w be implem5t$ bas$ on symbolic models4 ,?is means t any sexual activity w be condition$ by ! pr$ictions on symbolic models4 ,! normal sexual behavi\r1 9 #ajj ye>s f n[1 w be v diff]5t f today4 ,x is v likely t ?is pr$iction w be confirm$ = ! symbolic c\ntries4 ,= ! 'image' c\ntries1 due to fundam5talism1 "o c assume t a fraction ( ! population1 at lea/1 w turn back to ! protection sy/em bas$ on in/9cts4 ,x is v difficult to evaluate ! global effect ( ! m5tion$ behavi\r on ^! c\ntries4 ,,eta #cc3 ,! int]nal body ,,mdt is associat$ ) ! ma9 bra9 :i*1 among o!r functions1 controls also ! ext]nal body 7h&s1 legs1 etc74 ,= ! int]nal body 7int]nal organs44471 !re is an extra bra91 :i* is a te*nological process bra94 ,?is process bra9 conta9s basically an image model ( ! :ole int]nal body 7its ext]nal reality conta9s ! :ole int]nal body74 ,its scope is to ma9ta9 ! /ability ( ! :ole int]nal body4 ,:5 a p]turbation occurs1 a model w simulate "o or sev]al solutions1 9 ord] to rega9 ! equilibrium4 ,!re is a connection betwe5 ! ma9 bra9 & ! process bra91 z x c be se5 exp]im5tally4 ,?us1 a bad psy*ological /ate 7_m unfav\rable pr$ictions7 c produce p]turbations 9 ! functions ( ! int]nal organs4 ,! inv]se influ5ce also exi/s3 a heal?y psy*ological /ructure c improve ! g5]al heal?4 ,situations exi/ :5 sev]al p]turbations appe> among ! sy/ems ( ! int]nal body4 ,9 a complex situation1 ! model _c und]/& anymore :at happ5$1 due to ! too complex /ructure4 ,"s nonconv5tional m$ical tream5ts exi/1 :i* c be us$ to control su* situations4 ,,mdt is n v mu* preoccupi$ ) ?is problem1 z extremely _m factors exi/1 associat$ to ! te*nological implem5tation ( ! :ole be+4 ,?is section want$ only to %[ t ! function+ ( ! int]nal body is controll$ by a te*nological process bra91 :i* works 9 ! same way z ! ma9 bra94 ,! process bra9 is d$icat$ to ! con/ruction ( a reality associat$ to our int]nal body1 :i* repres5ts its ext]nal reality4 ,,eta #cd3 ,! ,european _s ,! !ory & ! applications are associat$ ma9ly to ! ,european cultural space4 ,europe is a cultural environm5t :]e ! ext5sive developm5t ( civilization 0 a*iev$ bas$ on symbolic models1 associat$ or n to image models4 ,except geometry 7creat$ 9 a space 9 close communication ) ! ,european cultural space71 ,europeans h creat$ ! great fundam5tal models4 ,we are talk+ "h ab\t ,*ri/ianity1 op5 sea navigation1 ! helioc5tric model ( ! ,univ]se1 polyphonic music1 ,newton's ,me*anics1 ,quantum ,me*anics & ,relativity !ory4 ,let's evaluate ! ,european _s bas$ on "s ( ^! models4 ,! ,roman ,empire has be5 creat$ ?r\gh conque/1 b :]ev] ! ,romans got1 !y creat$ effici5t organisation /ructures1 :i* h be5 9 fav\r ( ! conqu]$ p too4 ,?us1 ,romans h be5 bo? conqu]ors & civilisators4 ,?is *>act]i/ic 9 ! way ( ?9k+ is a p]man5t feature ( ,europeans up to our "t4 ,?us1 ! l>ge colonial empires did n br+ colonisation ( ,europe ) slaves4 ,indep5d5t ( ! inju/ice to ! colonies1 :5 leav+ !m1 !y 7 left 9 a good or v good g5]al %ape1 e4g4 ,hong ,kong4 ,n[adays1 ! ,european ,union sp5ds a lot ( money e>n$ by ,european "w1 to civilise ,ea/]n ,europe4 ,europeans creat$ ,*ri/ianity = ,europeans4 ,?is is :y ! ,*ri/ian religion is tol]ant & has r$uc$ t5d5cies t[>ds fanatism4 ,a significant numb] ( facts %[ t ,europeans h an adv5tur\s _s 7,m>co ,polo1 ,columbus1 ,magellan etc47 ,! _s ( adv5ture is associat$ closely ) ! desire ( k1 ! se>* = new ways ( evolution1 & ! ne$ to analyze ev]y?+1 & nev] accept an inv>iant situation4 ,an example exi/s connect$ ) ! helioc5tric model ( ! ,univ]se4 ,f ,antiquity1 ev]ybody knew t ,e>? is ! c5t] ( ! ,univ]se4 ,?is 0 prov$ by direct ev]yday exp]i5ce &1 at lea/1 implicitly1 by ! ,holy ,bible4 ,! s*ol>s ( ,antiquity h left u precise me?ods ( calculation = eclipses ( ! ,sun & ! ,moon1 & data on ! ecliptic1 & z a consequ5ce on ! position ( ! ,equator & ! ,tropics4 ,!n1 :y aft] ye> #aejj1 "s ,europeans did consid] t some?+ 0 fi%y ab\t ! geoc5tric model ( ! ,univ]se8 ,!re 0 a small problem2 f ! billions ( />s1 sev5 _h an app>5tly *aotic movem5t4 ,! ,anci5t ,greeks h call$ !m rambl+ />s or planets4 ,! ,european _s c\ld n accept ?is4 ,nikolaus ,cop]nicus publi%$ 9 ! la/ ye> ( 8 life ! helioc5tric !ory ( ! ,univ]se4 ,x 0 = ! fir/ "t :5 ! ,european _s & ,*ri/ian religion cla%$4 ,giordano ,bruno1 a great ,european1 has pay$ ) 8 dea? ! su/a9+ ( ! idea ( ! ,e>? n be+ ! c5t] ( ! ,univ]se1 & ,galileo ,galilei _h to be humiliat$ to survive4 ,b1 surprise6 ,kepl] v]ifi$ ,cop]nicus' !ory & discov]$ t x is wrong 7! positions calculat$ = ! planets did n correspond to ! exp]im5tal data74 ,kepl] 0 n disc\rag$ & he discov]$ t1 if ! orbits 7 to be ellyptical1 & n circul> z said by ,cop]nicus1 !n1 ! calculations c\ld be compatible ) ! exp]im5tal data4 ,lat]1 ,newton 0 able to f9d ! explanation ( ?is situation4 ,! problem 0 solv$ beyond any d\bt 9 ! fav\r ( ! ,european _s4 ,aft] _m c5turies1 ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur* admitt$ (ficially ! situation & rehabilitat$ ,galileo ,galilei1 b n ,giordano ,bruno4 ,! above consid]ations sugge/ ! ess5ce ( ! ,european _s3 lib]alism & tol]ance1 ! desire = k & ! t5d5cy to adv5ture4 ,we w say a few words ab\t a new issue4 ,x appe>s n[1 t a ,european ,con/itution is to be writt54 ,! problem is associat$ ) ! prote/s ( ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur* g5]at$ by ! non-inclusion 9 ! ,con/itution draft ( a phrase on ! ,*ri/ian orig9 ( ! ,european civilisation4 ,z we h se5 above1 ,europeans h creat$ ,*ri/ianity = ,europeans4 ,9 spite ( ?is1 9 _m cases ! ,european _s cla%$ viol5tly ) ! ,*ri/ian _s4 ,! ma9 reason is connect$ to ! dynamism associat$ ) ! ,european _s1 :i* _c accept an inv>iant model 7religion74 ,! ,european _s always 0 victori\s1 b ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur* did n succe$ to evolve fa/ en\gh to su/a9 always ! ,european _s4 ,! ,*ur* doesn't seem to h le>n$ any?+ along ! c5turies1 if1 ev5 n[adays1 x opposes ! ,european _s 9 problems l ! same-sex m>riages1 abortion or accept+ wom5 z prie/s4 ,?us1 !re is1 up to a po9t1 a ju/ification to ! decision n to include 9 ! ,european ,con/itution ! ref]5ce to ,*ri/ianity4 ,we ne$ to note t accept+ same-sex m>riages is n1 9 pr9ciple1 a good ?+1 & ,i believe t _m ,europeans h ?is po9t ( view4 ,h[ev]1 ! ,european lib]al & tol]ant _s /ates t1 pass+ ov] any pros & cons1 !re %\ld n exi/1 9 pr9ciple1 any au?ority to oppose to ! wi% ( ! p to se>* & exp]im5t new ways ( life toge!r4 ,european homosexuals are ,europeans1 & h ! "r to live _! life z !y consid] x "r4 ,note3 ,! fact t ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur*1 creat$ by ,europeans = ,europeans1 has come at times into viol5t conflict ) ! ,european _s1 does n mean at all t x is a non-,european ,*ur*4 ,dur+ ! #bjjj ye>s ( ,*ri/ianity1 ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur* _h a v positive role 9 keep+ ! /ability ( ! _w1 & gave hope to a lot ( p4 ,leav+ fai? beh9d1 creat$ mon/]s 7e4g4 ,communism74 ,?is section wants only to %[ to ! ,*ur*1 t x %\ld be m flexible &1 indep5d5t ( its great m]its1 avoid to get into conflict ) ! ,european _s4 ,! ,european _s has always be5 victori\s & w always w9 any battle ) ! ,*ri/ian _s4 ,let's foll[ h[ev] "s facts4 ,! fir/ fundam5tal symbolic model is ,euclid's geometry4 ,x 0 creat$ ab\t ! ye> #cjj ,,bc & is unmodifi$ up to our days4 ,! scol>s ( ! p]iod left u a huge am\nt ( sci5tific data kept 9 l>ge libr>ies ( ! ,antiquity4 ,at #dae ,,ad1 ! ,*ri/ian lead]s de/roy$ ! great libr>y ( ,alex&ria1 because ! books h be5 consid]$ contr>y to ! ,*ri/ian religion4 ,! result 0 t sci5tific k has be5 completely de/roy$ = a v long "t 7! ,european civilization ent]$ 9 ! ,d>k ,ages71 s t ! next fundam5tal symbolic model 7,newton7 appe>$ ov] #bjjj ye>s aft] ,euclid6 ,x is cle> t ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur* _h an active role 9 ?is unacceptable big delay1 by ! de/ruction ( ! books & block+ free?9k+4 ,h[ev]1 x is n cle> t ?is delay 0 caus$ by ! em]g5ce ( ! mono!i/ ,*ri/ian religion or x is associat$ ) a *>act]i/ic ( ! developm5t ( ! bra94 ,i mean1 any mono!i/ religion wants ! control ( ! ?9k+ sy/em ( ! p4 ,! ma9 problem is if ! p accept ?is1 or n4 ,! ,*ri/ian ,*ur* us$ to keep up to fifty ye>s ago a li/ ( =bidd5 books & ideas1 b v few p take x 9 consid]ation4 ,! g5]al problem is /ill op54 ,! evolution t[>ds symbolic models r$uces m & m ! influ5ce ( religion on society1 & ?is c be se5 9 ! increase 9 ! numb] ( ^? :o ignore religion4 ,_m p1 :o d5y ! exi/5ce ( ,god1 are consid]es 'a!i/'4 ,h[ev]1 ?is t]m has ano!r mean+1 clos] to its initial mean+1 giv5 by ! anci5t ,greek1 i4e4 a p]son :o c live )\t ! help ( ,god4 ,we d5ote ?is t]m by a!i/-#b & we associate ?is def9ition to x3 a p]son :o c live )\t ! help ( ,god1 )\t any o!r specifications4 ,an a!i/-#b c\ld e4g4 n d5y ! exi/5ce ( ,god1 b he doesn't ne$ ,him to live normally 9 a ,european-type society4 ,?is also means t an a!i/-#b c ent] any religi\s site 7,*ri/ian or n7 & respect ! site1 fai? & ! believ]s4 ,?is has be5 mo/ly ! ,european _s ( all times4 ,"o ( ! t5d5cies ( ,europeans1 9 accordance ) ! ,european _s1 has be5 to be a!i/-#b 7an effect ( ! lib]alism & tol]ance71 b only lately1 z an effect ( ! increase ( ! p[] ( symbolic models1 ?is %[s1 includ+ 9 ! /ati/ical data4 ,?is t5d5cy w gr[ & x w dep5d only on ! ,*ri/ian ,*ur* to *ange1 & accept ! a!i/-#b z !y are4 ,europe has ano!r problem3 x />t$ ! mo/ de/ructive w>s ( ! #bj? c5tury & creat$ horrible ideologies3 ,nazism & ,communism4 ,! w>s1 ,nazism & ,communism c be associat$ to ! adv5tur\s _s specific to ,europeans1 b contradict lib]alism & tol]ance4 ,! ,europeans w>s appe>$ :5 ! relative importance ( ! #d factors has be5 di/ort$4 ,?us1 ^? :o />t$ ! w>s1 ^? :o appli$ ! ,nazi & ,communi/ pr9ciples h dep>t$ f ! ,european _s4 ,!re w always be a high risk = ,europe1 :5 ?is _s is di/ort$4 ,let's see1 = evaluation purpose1 ,europe's relation%ip ) its ma9 'competitor'1 ,,usa4 ,! ,europeans1 :o h =m$ ma9ly ! population ( ,,usa1 h be5 ! ,europeans ) a /rong t5d5cy to action 7!y h be5 build+ easily ,z,a,ms & ,,azm & !y h be5 eag] to activate !m74 ,?is expla9s ! p[] & effici5cy ( ! ,am]ican society1 b also ! weaknesses ( ! ,,usa 7does n 'produce' top p]sonalities & ne$s to 'import' !m74 ,?is also expla9s ! v high level ( ,,xs#a-type s*izophr5ia 9 ! ,am]ican society4 ,z we "k1 9 a /able & effici5t society1 ! t5d5cy exi/s to build suitable models to ea* problem4 ,! ,am]icans consid] g5]ally t !re is only "o optimal way to solve a problem4 ,! speciali/s w f9d ?is optimal solution & w impose x to ev]ybody4 ,?us ! population reacts suitably to any problem4 ,h[ev] ! price = effici5cy is ,,xs#a-type s*izophr5ia2 if ! situation is *ang$1 ! p h no suitable solutions anymore1 & !y are block$ z !y are n prep>$ to build on _! own new models 9 front ( a new *ang+ reality 7?is problem has be5 pres5t$ 9 sev]al o!r ,e,t,as74 ,f "h em]ge ! diff]5ces betwe5 ! two cultural environm5ts1 ! ,european & ! ,am]ican ones4 ,example3 ,9 any c\ntry1 includ$ ,,usa1 !re is a :ite l9e 9 front ( any traffic light4 ,if ! traffic light *anges to r$ & somebody /ops aft] pass+ ! l9e by #aj-;cm e4g41 ?is is illegal 9 ! ,,usa & ! driv] is call$ 9 c\rt4 ,9 ,europe ?is 'illegality' produces at mo/ smiles4 ,europeans w nev] accept 'p]fection'4 ,! ,am]ican success is giv5 by p]fection1 & p]fection is 9 contradiction ) creativity & ! ,european _s4 ,! ,european _s is k ori5t$1 :ile ! ,am]ican p]fectioni/ _s is goal-ori5t$4 ,let's see "s examples ( ! competition betwe5 ,europe & ,,usa4 ,9 ,civil ,aviation1 ! ,europeans came to sell m planes ?an ! ,am]icans d4 ,?is %[s t ! ,european _s is effici5t 9 ! m & m symbolic _w we live 94 ,9 ,nucle> ,physics1 ,europeans h discov]$ two subnucle> p>ticles1 ,w & ,z 7,nobel ,prize71 :5 ! ,am]icans _h ! ne$$ equipm5t 7high- en]gy p>ticle accel]ators71 b did n d ! necess>y exp]im5t4 ,! ,europeans cont9ue to be creative & effici5t4 ,let's see ! rev]se z well4 ,! ,europeans want$ to build a fight]-plane1 to compete ! ,,u ones4 ,!n !y discov]$ t !y hav5't got ! te*nology to make x 'invisible'1 hav5't got en\gh money to build x & hav5't got ! backgr\nd infra/ructure to support ?is weapon sy/em4 ,ev5 ! navigation sy/em 7,,gps7 is ,am]ican4 ,?is is an example ( ! ,european adv5tur\s _s4 ,?is _s c be se5 9 ! build+ ( ! ,a#chj 7! bigge/ airl9] 9 ! _w74 ,we w see 9 a few ye>s ! result ( ! competition betwe5 ! ,am]ican p]fectionism & ! ,european _s4 ,we h situations :5 p]fectionism is 9 conflict ) ! ,european tol]ance 7! ,am]icans are less tol]ant ?an ,europeans74 ,! result is t 9 a few crucial problems ( ! long-range evolution ( ! society1 ! ,europeans h a slightly r$uc$ capacity ( und]/&+ :at is go+ on4 ,e4g4 9 ! ,irakian problem1 ! ,european tol]ant _s produc$ a diff]5t reaction ?an ! ,,usa4 ,i ?9k t _m ,europeans are conv9c$ t t]rorism _c be f\ght by dialogue1 b _! tol]ant _s made !m su/a9 t4 ,"h ! ,europeans h problems1 :i* w gr[ along ) ! evolution ( ! society4 ,! ,europeans h no pr9cipial solution1 z1 actually1 ! ,am]icans hav5't ei!r4 ,let's summ>ize ! ,european _s4 ,! tol]ant _s1 *>act]i/ic to ,europeans too1 has to be pres]v$ z absolutely necess>y 9 a symbolic society1 b x c turn aga9/ ! society 9 fundam5tal problems4 ,! lib]alism1 _s ( adv5ture & desire ( k are basic compon5ts ( ! ,european spirituality1 & !y _c be giv5-up1 z long z ,europe w exi/4 ,europe w be 9 great dang] anytime :5 x w di/ort ! ,european _s1 z x _h be5 def9$ above4 ,?is evaluation discussion %\ld be end$ "h1 b un=tunately all ,i h /at$ up to n[ is n really correct 9 a sci5tific approa*4 ,z we "k1 a sci5tific approa* is bas$ on ! exi/5ce ( a decl>$ local model4 ,?is local model has to g5]ate ! def9itions ( ! t]ms us$4 ,let's />t build+ a local model1 & !n we c return to read ! above /atem5ts4 ,let's beg9 ) ! #d t]ms3 lib]alism1 tol]ance1 _s ( adv5ture & desire ( k4 ,lib]alism is associat$ ) ! te*nical capacity ( a bra9 to build sev]al long-range models1 associat$ to ! same ext]nal reality4 ,moreov]1 t bra9 has to comp5sate = ! design defici5cy ,,xd#c 7) ,a & ,b v>iants1 see ,,mdt74 ,z sev]al models exi/1 associat$ to ! same ext]nal reality1 ! possibility exi/s to activate any ( !m or sev]al at "o "t2 ^! models c *ange dynamically4 ,! lib]alism & ! _s ( tol]ance are closely connect$4 ,lib]alism admits sev]al ways ( action1 & tol]ance makes possible ! *oice ( sev]al ways1 alt]natively or simultane\sly4 ,lib]alism & tol]ance are *>act]i/ic to an evolv$ & high quality bra94 ,x is v important to note t tol]ance implies ! k ( sev]al models associat$ to ! same ext]nal reality4 ,:5 ! bra9 _c build anymore sev]al models associat$ ) ! same ext]nal reality1 x w re/ra9 itself to a s+le model1 & intol]ance appe>s4 ,! p]fectioni/s 7e4g4 ! ,am]icans7 c h a s]i\s problem "h4 ,p]fectionism means reject+ basically all ! models1 except "o creat$ by speciali/s4 ,?us1 ! t5d5cy to induc$ s*izophr5ia 7,,xs#a;,b7 increases = ! p]fectioni/s4 ,example3 ,! prompt] is us$ 9 "s ,,tv broadca/s4 ,! p]sons read+ ! news are totally de-p]sonalis$ & practically recite1 sometimes )\t und]/&+ :at !y are say+1 ev5 :5 !y are ! au?ors ( ! texts4 ,:5 news is pres5t$1 bo? speak]s & li/5]s h two problems3 to read_/li/5 to ! message & to und]/& its mean+4 ,:5 ! p]fectionism ( transmission ( ! message is exag]at$1 p w allocate less en]gy to und]/&+ its mean+4 ,us+ ! prompt] is aga9/ ! tol]ance & ! _s ( adv5ture *>act]i/ic to ,europeans4 ,let's analyze n[ ! _s ( adv5ture & ! desire ( k4 ,9 front ( a complex ext]nal reality1 we ne$ to build m & m complex ,,zm models4 ,)\t !m1 ,z,a,ms c be built only approximately4 ,?is situation is practically v frequ5t1 & ! reaction to imp]fect ,z,ms w *>act]ize ! _s ( adv5ture & ! desire ( k4 ,x is cle> t if we h no good quality ,z,ms1 we _c build good quality ,z,a,ms1 & ?is w block ev5 m our possibility to build good quality ,z,ms4 ,a solution is to develop ! ,z,ms & ,z,a,ms 7by simulation on suitable te/ models7 up to ! mom5t :5 we h en\gh gu>antees t an action on ! ext]nal reality w evolve z pr$ict$4 ,?is is h[ p]fectioni/s act4 ,a second solution is to act bas$ on ! imp]fect available models1 evaluat+ ! risk 9 a m or less precise way4 ,! action 9 ^! circum/ances *>act]izes ! _s ( adv5ture4 ,! _s ( adv5ture is /rongly relat$ to ! desire ( k4 ,9 fact1 we c say t ! desire ( k 7to h bett] & bett] ,z,ms7 is driv5 by ! _s ( adv5ture 7to activate ,z,a,ms t we "k to be imp]fect74 ,p]fectioni/s are m goal-ori5t$1 & n k-ori5t$4 ,example 7effects ( p]fectionism73 ,! ,am]icans h impos$ ! op]at+ sy/ems = comput]s & _m programs associat$ ) !m4 ,p]fectioni/s h creat$ !m4 ,_! scope is to atta9 a goal & n directly k4 ,?is _s is incompatible ) ! ,european _s & _m ,europeans feel x4 ,=c$ to evolve 9 a p]fectioni/ type environm5t1 ! comput] us] becomes sl[ly b surely an accessory to ! comput]4 ,ano!r example c be giv5 associat$ ) ! negative effects ( p]fectionism4 ,aft] ! #i_/aa ev5ts1 ! p]fectioni/ ,am]ican solution 0 ! introduction ( draconic cu/oms & bord] rules & o!r homel& security rules1 :i* are n effici5t 9 any real situation4 ,! p]fectioni/s h no o!r available me?od4 ,9 ,europe1 ! _s ( adv5ture & desire = k is manife/1 :i* means t ! ,europeans d n act accord+ to 'rules' z p]fectioni/s d1 b use _! indep5d5t capacity ( le>n+ & act+ 9 a new unkn[n environm5t4 ,we w see on long-t]m ! effici5cy ( ! ,european me?ods 9 a _w 9 :i*1 accord+ to ,,mdt1 ! disp]sion ( ! human bra9 developm5t level is increas+ dang]\sly4 ,,endnotes ,?is book c create problems to ! majority ( read]s4 ,! ma9 problem is connect$ to ! assimilation mode ( new k4 ,! usual way1 promot$ by ! educational sy/em at all levels is assimilation ( /ory-type models 7logically /ructur$ or n79 an image type environm5t4 ,?is book (f]s no *ance to ^? :o expect a /ory-type model associat$ ) image models4 ,x _c be 9 any way associat$ to any image model4 ,! book pres5ts a s+le symbolic model2 x has to be und]/ood z x is1 z a :ole1 bas$ on logic4 ,! basic requirem5t is to h ! capacity to build & op]ate symbolic models4 ,p :o "w 9 positive sci5ces 7physici/s1 ma!maticians1 eng9e]s4447 are fav\r$1 :ile o!rs h little *ance to und]/& any?+4 ,"s 'te/' read]s ( ! book 7 displeas$ by ! repetition ( sev]al issues 9 diff]5t contexts4 ,?is me?od is m&atory :5 a new symbolic model has to be assimilat$4 ,! p]sons :o h ! t5d5cy to build /ory-type models w be v mu* di/urb$ by ! repetitions1 z ! repetition s5ds !m back to ! po9t :]e ! /atem5t appe>$ = ! fir/ "t4 ,?is w fragm5t ! /ory- type model4 ,once fragm5t$1 x _c be cont9u$ & a new /ory-type model has to be built4 ,?is produces irritation 9 ?is category ( read]s4 ,on ! contr>y1 ^? :o build normal models w consid] repetion z positive1 z x reconfirms ! correctness ( ! assimilat$ normal model4 ,! model is logical & ?us c be develop$ by anybody :o has abilities 9 build+ & op]at+ symbolic models4 ,a %ort summ>y has be5 giv5 at ! beg9n+ ( ! book4 ,bas$ only on ?is summ>y & a few obs]vations bas$ on ext]nal reality1 anybody c\ld rewrite1 maybe ev5 bett] ?an ,i1 ?is :ole book4 ,! reason is t any symbolic model is develop$ univocally bas$ on logic4 ,ano!r aspect ,i want to und]l9e is t ?is is a fundam5tal model4 ,bas$ on x1 "o c build an unlimit$ numb] ( local models associat$ ) specific problems4 ,anybody :o has assimilat$ ! model c develop x ) 8_/h] own res\rces = specific problems4 ,e4g4 ?is fundam5tal model c g5]ate a new positive sci5ce call$ psy*ology4 ,*ildr5 />t+ ) age #ab c und]/& ! book4 ,at ?is age1 *ildr5 c build & op]ate relatively complex symbolic models1 includ+ comput] programm+4 ,humans h a basic problem relat$ to ! p]ception ( ! ext]nal reality4 ,i h discuss$ ) sev]al p :o h n be5 di/urb$ by ! fact t1 e4g4 9 psy*ology1 ! t]ms us$ h no normal def9itions 7only descriptive ones74 ,!re are p :o believe t a positive sci5ce is a sci5ce t uses app>ata & gives precise results ( "s measurem5ts4 ,ev5 among physici/s problems exi/1 mo/ don't ev5 realize t :at !y are do+ is integrat$ into symbolic models4 ,!y "k v well ! models !y build & op]ate1 b "s d n "k ! t]m 'symbolic model'4 ,_m d n realize t any symbolic model is integrat$ into ano!r symbolic "o1 until a fundam5tal symbolic model c be rea*$4 ,example3 ,_m w be surpris$ to f9d out t any comput] program is a symbolic model4 ,a program writt5 e4g4 9 ,java1 is a symbolic model4 ,! ,java language itself is a symbolic model4 ,java is probably includ$ 9 ! symbolic model call$ ,c4 ,c itself is includ$ 9 ,assembl]1 :i* on its turn is includ$1 toge!r ) all ! programs1 :i* h ev] be5 writt51 & any program :i* w ev] be creat$1 9 ! fundam5tal symbolic model call$ ma*9e language4 ,:atev] ! level we are on1 a comput] program />ts ) ! con/ruction ( ! symbolic model4 ,?is means t we ne$ to decl>e ! elem5ts1 _! prop]ties & ! fundam5tal relations 9 betwe5 !m4 ,?is is valid = languages bas$ or n on algori?ms4 ,any?+ :i* foll[ is call$ simulation on models4 ,prop]ties ( elem5ts or ( relations c be *ang$1 & we c see :at happ5s4 ,once ?is symbolic model is /able 7has no logical contradictions71 x has to be calibrat$1 i4e4 ne$s to be v]ifi$ on cases :]e ! result is kn[n4 ,9 mo/ cases1 ! calibration implies a l>g] ef=t ?an build+ ! model4 ,:at we obta9 f any comput] program is a pr$iction ( ! model4 ,if ! program is /able 7logical7 & if x pass$ ! calibration te/s1 !n its pr$ictions w be comp>$ ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,we rem9d "h t ! assembly ( all pr$ictions ( a symbolic model is call$ reality associat$ to ! model4 ,x is n at all surpris+ t1 9 ! same way z ) ! bra91 t]ms z tru? or reality c be associat$ to a comput] program1 ) ! def9itions f ,,mdt !ory ( ! bra94 ,! reason is easily und]/&able3 we ext5d to ! ext]ior our own /ructure ( models ( ! bra94 ,seems to be impossible to d any?+ except ?is6 ,! above /atem5t is int]e/+ also "u ano!r aspect4 ,?us1 no connection exi/s betwe5 ! basic functions ( ! bra9 & a comput]4 ,h[ev]1 we use comput]s to ext5d to ! ext]ior ! functions ( our bra94 ,,mdt makes a few pr$ictions t are v difficult to accept4 ,! educational sy/em is bas$ on assimilation ( image & symbolic models1 & v]ify+ ( ! assimilation 9 specific te/s4 ,?is me?od has a problem4 ,bas$ on ! !ory1 ^? :o h abilities to assimilate models h r$uc$ qualities 9 build+ new models4 ,! problem is relat$ to ! fact t ! level ( consci\sness dep5ds on ! capacity to build new models4 ,?us1 s*ool has ! t5d5cy to promote individuals ) r$uc$ level ( consci\sness4 ,,mdt %[s t !re are p k-ori5t$ & action-ori5t$4 ,! action-ori5t$ are n fav\ris$ by ! educational sy/em1 & ! ones ori5t$ to k are ov]appreciat$4 ,! action-ori5t$ p move ! society =w>d1 & ! educational sy/em does n und]/& ?is _m times4 ,! !ory def9es s*izophr5ia z ! incapacity to build & op]ate long- range models4 ,long-range models are requir$ n only = ! =mation ( consci\sness b also = ! pr$iction ( problems t might occur 9 ! future4 ,! s*izophr5ic me?od is to solve ! problems z !y appe>1 "o /ep at a "t4 ,an 'elaborate' =m ( s*izophr5ia is call$ pragmatism4 ,! normal way ( int]action ) ext]nal reality is to h long-range models associat$ ) ! ext]nal reality4 ,^! models c pr$ict ! occur5ce ( future problems :i* c be prev5t$ be=e _! appe>ance4 ,"h is ! ,engli% v]sion ( my book ,crei]ul o ,enigma ,descifrata 79 ,romanian7 :i* is also available 9 ! frame ( ,gut5b]g ,project4 ,i want to ?ank to ,dr4 ,angela ,vasilescu & ,adrian ,moisa = _! help 9 ! translation4 ,,bibliography ,!re is no specific bibliography4 ,,mdt is a fundam5tal !ory4 ,t is1 all ! t]ms & all ! def9itions ( !m are g5]at$ by ! model4 ,no book c be us$ because 9 any book !re are us$ t]ms ) def9itions :i* are n compatible ) ,,mdt's t]ms & def9itions4 ,example3 !re is a book ( a rese>*] nam$ ,titu ,i4 ,baj5escu ) ! title ,! p]=mance ( ! artificial intellig5ce 7,alba/ra ,publi%+ ,h\se1 ,sibiu1 ,romania1 9 ,romanian language74 ,9 ! ,bibliography ( ?is book1 ! au?or has _m hundr$s titles1 includ+ #bda ( 8 own4 ,!re is1 9 ! book1 a diction>y ( ! ma9 t]ms us$ by au?or4 ,"o ( ^! t]ms is intellig5ce4 ,! au?or def9es x by #af diff]5t /atem5ts :i* conta9s at lea/ #ab undef9$ words 7to "k1 to und]/&1 rational1 conceptual k1 s5sation1 intuition1 to discov]1 _s1 to addapt1 "*1 to le>n1 problem1 exp]i5ce44474 ,?us1 to und]/& :at is intellig5ce we ne$ to "k 9 advance ! def9itions associat$ ) all ( ^! t]ms4 ,^! def9titions mu/ conta9 only words :i* are already def9$4444 ,an endless proces />ts 9 ?is way4 ,( c\rse1 ! au?or has no def9ition ( ! t]m intellig5ce2 he has only a description ( x4 ,ev5 worse1 bas$ ( ! impressive bibliography1 x is cle> t ?is v important t]m has no def9ition4 ,! au?ot himself recognize ?is by say+3 ! intellig5ce is a h>d to def9e concept because x is impossible to f9d a s+le def9ition to be accept$ by all4 ,9 association ) ! above example1 ,,mdt-model g5]ates ! normal def9ition ( ! t]m intellig5ce z ! facility to make & opp]ate a long range model4 ,! book cit$ above _c be us$ & ! situation is ! same ) all ! books associat$ ) ! function ( ! bra91 available n[4 ,i us$ only brute data associat$ ) ! hi/ory ( ! human species 7e4g4 diction>ies or press reports7 :i* _c be cit$ 9 a specific way4 ,dor9 ,teodor ,,moisa moisazappmobile4ro ,octob] #bjjd