,,wanted1 ,a ,,young ,,woman ,,to ,,do ,,housework ,business ,principles ,applied to ,housework by ,c4 ,h,l,,ne ,,barker ,author of ,automobile ,french ,new ,york ,moffat1 ,yard ,company #aiae ,,preface ,this little book is not a treatise on ,domestic ,science4 ,the vacuum cleaner and the fireless cooker are not even mentioned4 ,the efficient kitchen devised in such an interesting and clever way has no place in it4 ,its exclusive object is to suggest a satisfactory and workable solution along modern lines of how to get one's housework efficiently performed without doing it one's self4 ,if the propositions that she advances seem at first startling1 the writer begs only for a patient hearing1 for she is convinced by strong reasons and abundant experience1 that liberty in the household1 like social and political liberty1 can never come except from obedience to just law4 ,c4,h4,b4 ,,contents ,,part ,i ,,causes ,,of ,,the ,,present ,,unsatisfactory ,,condition ,,of ,,domestic ,,labor ,ignorance and ,inefficiency in the ,home #a ,difficulty of ,obtaining ,women to ,do ,housework #aa ,the ,disadvantages of ,housework ,compared with ,work in ,factories1 ,stores1 and ,offices #ai ,,part ,,ii ,,business ,,principles ,,applied ,,to ,,housework ,living ,outside ,place of ,employment #ca ,housework ,limited to #h ,hours a ,day #dg ,housework ,limited to #f ,days a ,week #fa ,the ,observance of ,legal ,holidays #ge ,extra ,pay for ,overtime #ha ,,part ,,iii ,,eight ,,hour ,,schedules ,,in ,,the ,,home ,eight ,hour ,schedules for ,one ,employee #ic ,eight ,hour ,schedules for ,two ,employees #aji ,eight ,hour ,schedules for ,three ,employees #aba ,,part ,i ,,causes ,,of ,,the ,,present ,,unsatisfactory ,,condition ,,of ,,domestic ,,labor ,ignorance and inefficiency in the home4 ,difficulty of obtaining women to do housework4 ,the disadvantages connected with housework compared with work in factories1 stores1 and offices4 ,,ignorance ,,and ,,inefficiency ,,in ,,the ,,home ,the twentieth-century woman1 in spite of her progressive and ambitious theories about woman's sphere of activity1 has allowed her housekeeping methods to remain almost stationary1 while other professions and industries have moved forward with gigantic strides4 ,she does not hesitate to blazon abroad with banners and pennants her desire to share with man the responsibility for the administration of the ,state1 but she overlooks the disquieting fact that in the management of her own household1 where her authority is absolute1 she has failed to convince the world of her power to govern4 ,when confronted with this accusation1 she asserts that the maintenance of a home is neither a business nor a profession1 and that in consequence it ought not to be compared with them nor be judged by the same standards4 ,is it not due perhaps to this erroneous idea that housekeeping is a failure to-day8 ,for the fact that it is a failure cannot be hidden1 and that it has been a failure for many years past is equally true4 ,recent inventions1 and labor saving utensils1 have greatly facilitated housework1 yet housekeeping is still accompanied with much dissatisfaction on the part of the employer and the employee4 ,there are only a few women to-day who regard domestic science in the light of a profession1 or a business1 although in reality it is both4 ,for what is a profession if it be not the application of science to life8 ,and does not work which one follows regularly constitute a business8 ,many women1 however1 do not regard housekeeping even as a serious occupation1 and few have devoted as much time1 thought1 and energy to mastering the principles of domestic economy as of late years women of all classes of society have willingly given to the study of the rules and ever changing intricacies of auction bridge4 ,some consider their time too valuable to devote to domestic and culinary matters1 and openly boast of their ignorance4 ,outside engagements1 pleasures1 philanthropic schemes1 or work1 monopolize their days1 and the conduct of the house devolves upon their employees4 ,the result is rarely satisfactory4 ,it is essential that the woman who is at the head of any concern1 be it a business1 a profession1 or a home1 should not only thoroughly understand its every detail1 but in order to make it a success she must give it her personal attention each day for at least a portion of her time4 ,it is a popular impression that the knowledge of good housekeeping1 and of the proper care of children1 comes naturally to a woman1 who1 though she had no previous training or preparation for these duties1 suddenly finds them thrust upon her4 ,but how many women can really look back with joy to the first years of their housekeeping8 ,do they not remember them more with a feeling of dismay than pleasure8 ,how many foolish mistakes occurred entailing repentance and discomfort6 ,and how many heart-burnings were caused1 and even tears shed1 because in spite of the best intentions1 everything seemed to go wrong8 ,and why8 ,simply because of ignorance and inefficiency in the home1 not only of the employee1 but of the employer also4 ,that an employee is ignorant and unskilled in her work is often excusable1 but there is absolutely no excuse for a woman who has time and money at her command1 to be ignorant of domestic science1 when of her own free will she undertakes the responsibilities of housekeeping4 ,nearly all women take interest in the furnishing of their homes1 and give their personal attention to it with the result that as a rule they excel in household decoration1 and often produce marvels of beauty and taste with the expenditure of relatively small amounts of money4 ,marketing is also very generally attended to in person by the housewife1 but she is using the telephone more and more frequently as a substitute for a personal visit to butcher and grocer1 and this is greatly to her disadvantage4 ,the telephone is a very convenient instrument1 especially in emergency1 or for ordering things that do not vary in price4 ,but when prices depend upon the fluctuations of the market1 or when the articles to be purchased are of a perishable nature1 it must be remembered that the telephone is also a very convenient instrument for the merchant who is anxious to get rid of his bad stock4 ,the remaining branches of housekeeping apparently do not interest the modern housewife4 ,she entrusts them very generally to her employees1 upon whose skill and knowledge she blindly relies4 ,unfortunately skill and knowledge are very rare qualities1 and if the housewife herself be ignorant of the proper way of doing the work in her own home1 how can she be fitted to direct those she places in charge of it1 or to make a wise choice when she has to select a new employee8 ,too often she engages women and young girls without investigating their references of character or capability1 and when time proves what an imprudent proceeding she has been party to1 she simply attributes the consequent troubles to causes beyond her control4 ,if the housewife were really worthy of her name she would be able not only to pick out better employees1 but to insist upon their work being properly done4 ,to-day she is almost afraid to ask her cook to prepare all the dishes for the family meals1 nor does she always find some one willing to do the family washing4 ,she is obliged to buy food already cooked from the caterer or baker1 because her so-called cook was not accustomed to bake bread and rolls1 or to make pies and cakes1 or ice cream1 for previous employers1 from whom nevertheless she received an excellent reference as cook4 ,of course in cities it is easy to buy food already cooked or canned and to send all the washing to the laundry1 but it helps to raise the high cost of living to alarming proportions1 and it also encourages ignorance in the most important branches of domestic economy4 ,in spite of the rush of modern life1 a woman who has a home ought to be willing to give some part of her time to its daily supervision4 ,eternal vigilance is the price of everything worth having4 ,if she gave this she would not have so many tales of woe to relate about the laziness1 neglectfulness1 and stupidity of her cook and housemaids4 ,there is not a single housewife to-day who has not had many bitter experiences4 ,one who desires information upon this subject has only to call on the nearest friend4 ,to the uninterested person1 to the onlooker1 the helplessness of the woman who is at the head of the home1 her inability to cope with her domestic difficulties1 is often comic1 sometimes pathetic1 sometimes almost tragic4 ,the publications of the day have caricatured the situation until it has become an outworn jest4 ,the present system of housekeeping can no longer stand4 ,one of two things must occur4 ,either the housewife must adopt business principles in ruling her household1 or she will find before many more years elapse there will be no longer any woman willing to place her neck under the domestic yoke4 ,if the principles set forth in the following pages can be popularized in a comprehensive plan of which all the parts can be thoroughly understood both by the housewife and her employee1 ignorance and inefficiency in the home will be presently abolished4 ,,difficulty ,,of ,,obtaining ,,women ,,to ,,do ,,housework ,the present unsatisfactory condition of domestic labor in private houses is not confined to any special city or country2 it is universal4 ,each year the difficulty of obtaining women to do housework seems to increase and the demand is so much greater than the supply1 that ignorant and inefficient employees are retained simply because it is impossible to find others more competent to replace them4 ,there is hardly a home to-day where1 at one time or another1 the housewife has not gone through the unenviable experience of being financially able and perfectly willing to pay for the services of some one to help her in her housekeeping duties1 and yet found it almost impossible to get a really competent and intelligent employee4 ,as a rule1 those who apply for positions in housework are grossly ignorant of the duties they profess to perform1 and the well trained1 clever1 and experienced workers are sadly in the minority4 ,women and young girls who face the necessity of self support1 or who wish to lead a life of independence1 no longer choose housework as a means of earning a livelihood4 ,it is evident that there is a reason1 and a very potent one1 that decides them to accept any kind of employment in preference to the work offered them in a private home4 ,wages1 apparently1 have little to do with their decision1 nor other considerations which must add very much to their material welfare1 such as good food in abundance1 and clean1 well ventilated sleeping accommodations1 for these two important items are generally included at present in the salaries of household employees4 ,concessions1 too1 are frequently made1 and favors bestowed upon them by many of their employers1 yet few young girls1 and still fewer women are content to work in private families4 ,it is a deplorable state of affairs1 and women seem to be gradually losing their courage to battle with this increasingly difficult question3 ,how to obtain and retain one's domestic employees8 ,the peace of the family and the joy and comfort of one's home should be a great enough incentive to awaken the housewife to the realization that something must be wrong in her present methods4 ,it is in vain that she complains bitterly1 on all occasions1 of the scarcity of good servants1 asserting that it is beyond her comprehension why work in factories1 stores1 and offices1 should be preferred to the work she offers4 ,is it beyond her comprehension8 ,or has she never considered in what way the work she offers differs from the work so eagerly accepted8 ,does she not realize that the present laws of labor adopted in business are very different from those she still enforces in her own home8 ,why does she not compare housework with all other work in which women are employed1 and find out why housework is disdained by nearly all self supporting women8 ,instead of doing this1 she sometimes avoids the trouble of trying to keep house with incompetent employees by living in hotels1 or non-housekeeping apartments2 but for the housewife who does not possess the financial means to indulge herself thus1 or who still prefers home life with all its trials to hotel life1 the only alternative is to submit to pay high wages for very poor work or to do a great part of the housework herself4 ,in both cases the result is bad1 for in neither does the family enjoy the full benefit of home1 nor is the vexatious problem1 so often designated as the servant question1 brought any nearer to a solution4 ,the careful study of any form of labor invariably reveals some need of amelioration1 but in none is there a more urgent need of reform than in domestic labor in private homes4 ,it is more for the sake of the housewife than for her employee that a reform is to be desired4 ,the latter is solving her problem by finding work outside the home1 while the former is still unduly harassed by household troubles4 ,with a few notable exceptions1 only those who are unqualified to compete with the business woman are left to help the householder1 and the problem confronting her to-day is not so much how to change inefficient to efficient help1 but how to obtain any help at all4 ,the spirit of independence has so deeply entered into the lives of women of all classes1 that until housework be regulated in such a way as to give to those engaged in it the same rights and privileges as are granted to them in other forms of labor1 the best workers will naturally seek employment elsewhere4 ,,the ,,disadvantages ,,of ,,housework ,,compared ,,with ,,work ,,in ,,factories1 ,,stores1 ,,and ,,offices ,housework1 when carefully compared with work performed by women in factories1 stores1 and offices1 shows to a remarkable degree how many old fashioned ways of conducting her household still cling to the modern housewife4 ,the methods that made housekeeping a success in the time of our ancestors are not adapted to the present needs of a society in which women who earn their own living are occupying so much more important positions than formerly4 ,large stores and factories1 requiring the coperation of many employees1 have done more to open new avenues of work for women than could have been dreamed of in former times1 when it was the custom for each family to produce at home as much as possible1 if not all1 that was necessary for its own consumption4 ,women1 as a rule1 are not taught self reliance1 and many who hesitate to leave their homes to earn a livelihood1 find that by doing work in stores1 factories1 or offices1 they are not utterly separated from their families4 ,the work may be harder than they anticipated and the pay small1 but there is always the hope of promotion and of a corresponding increase of wages4 ,business hours are frequently long1 but they are limited1 and after the day's work is over1 the remainder of the twenty-four hours is at the disposal of the employees1 who can still enjoy the happiness and freedom associated with the life of their own social circle4 ,besides they have one day out of seven as a day of rest1 and many legal holidays come annually to relieve the overstrain4 ,with housework it is very different4 ,the woman who accepts the position of a household employee in a private home must usually make up her mind to leave her family1 to detach herself from all home ties1 and to take up her abode in her employer's house4 ,it is only occasionally1 about once a week for a few hours at a time1 that she is allowed to make her escape4 ,it is a recognized fact that a change of environment has a beneficial effect upon every one1 but a domestic employee must forego this daily renewal of thought and atmosphere4 ,even if she does not know that she needs it in order to keep her mental activities alive1 the result is inevitable3 to one who does nothing but the same work from early morning until late at night and who never comes in contact with the outside world except four times a month1 the work soon sinks to mere drudgery4 ,as to promotion in housework it seems to be almost unknown4 ,considering the many responsible positions waiting to be filled in private families1 nothing could be more desirable than to instil into one's employees the ambition to rise4 ,an employee who has passed through all the different branches of domestic science1 from the lowest to the highest in one family1 must be far better fitted to occupy the highest position in that family than one who applies for the position with the training and experience gained only in other families where the mode of living may be very different4 ,since there is no chance of promotion and in consequence of receiving better pay1 the domestic employee is often tempted to seek higher wages elsewhere1 and thus the desire to make a change1 so disastrous to the peace of mind of the housewife1 is engendered in her employees4 ,in domestic labor the hours of work are longer than in any other form of employment1 for they are unlimited4 ,moreover1 instead of having one day out of seven as a day of rest1 only half a day is granted beginning usually about three o'clock in the afternoon1 or even later4 ,and legal holidays bring no relief1 for they are practically unknown to the household employee4 ,the only way women engaged in housework in private families can obtain a real holiday is by being suddenly called away to take care of a sick aunt4 ,there is an old saying containing certain words of wisdom about all work and no play that perhaps explains the dullness so often met with in domestic help4 ,the hardest thing to submit to1 however1 from the point of view of the woman employed in housework1 is the lack of freedom outside of working hours4 ,this prevents her from taking part in her former social life4 ,she is not allowed to go out even for an hour or two every day to see her relatives and friends4 ,to ask them to visit her in her employer's kitchen is not a very agreeable alternative either to herself or her employer1 and even then she is obliged to be on duty1 for she must still wear her uniform and hold herself in readiness to answer the bell until the family for whom she works retires for the night4 ,with such restrictions it is not surprising that the majority of women feel that they are losing caste if they accept positions in private families4 ,there are two more causes to which this feeling of the loss of caste may be attributed4 ,one is the habit of calling household employees by their first name or by their surname without the prefix of ,miss2 the other is the custom of making them eat in their employer's kitchen4 ,these are minor details1 perhaps1 but nevertheless they count for much in the lives of women who earn their own living1 and anything1 however small1 that tends to raise one's self respect1 is worthy of consideration4 ,perhaps1 too1 while the word servant 7a noble word enough in its history and its moral connotation7 carries with it a stigma1 a sense of degradation1 among the working women1 it should be avoided4 ,briefly summed up1 then1 the present disadvantages of housework compared with work in factories1 stores1 and offices1 are as follows3 ,enforced separation from one's family4 ,loss of personal freedom4 ,lack of promotion4 ,unlimited hours of work4 ,no day of rest each week4 ,non-observance of legal holidays4 ,loss of caste4 ,in the present comparison of housework with work in factories1 stores1 and offices1 a recital of the advantages of domestic service1 even under the present method of housekeeping1 must not be omitted1 for such advantages are important1 although unfortunately they do not outweigh the present disadvantages4 ,to the woman whose home ties have been disrupted by death or discord1 and to the newly arrived immigrant especially1 housework is a great boon1 inasmuch as besides good wages1 all meals and a room to sleep in are given her4 ,moreover housework is the only form of labor where unskilled work can command high wages4 ,this1 however1 is much more fortunate for the employee than for her employer4 ,housework in itself is certainly not worse than any other kind of manual work in which women are engaged2 it is often more interesting and less fatiguing4 ,it also helps a woman more than any other occupation to prepare herself for her natural sphere of life3--that of the home maker4 ,a girl who has spent several years in a well ordered family helping to do the housework1 is far better fitted to run her own home intelligently and on economic lines than a girl who has spent the same number of years behind a counter1 or working in a factory or an office4 ,again1 work in a private house is infinitely more desirable1 from the point of view of the influence of one's surroundings1 than daily labor in a factory or store4 ,the variety of domestic duties1 the freedom of moving about from one room to another1 of sitting or standing to do one's work1 are much to be preferred to the work that compels the worker to stand or sit in one place all day long4 ,if it be admitted1 then1 that housework is in itself a desirable and suitable occupation for women who must earn their living by manual labor1 it can not be the work itself1 but the conditions surrounding it that make it so distasteful to the modern working woman4 ,,part ,,ii ,,business ,,principles ,,applied ,,to ,,housework ,living outside place of employment4 ,housework limited to eight hours a day4 ,housework limited to six days a week4 ,the observance of legal holidays4 ,extra pay for overtime4 ,,living ,,outside ,,place ,,of ,,employment ,there are many housewives who are very much opposed to the adoption of a plan enabling household employees to live outside their place of employment4 ,they claim that it is wiser to keep them under constant supervision day and night in order to prevent the introduction of disease or the acquisition of bad habits4 ,there is more risk of disease being introduced into the home1 and of bad habits being contracted by allowing one's children to associate with other children in schools1 public or private1 and by letting them play in the streets and public parks1 where they mingle with more or less undesirable companions1 than by having the housework performed by employees who come each day to their work and return to their homes at night when their duties are over4 ,nevertheless no sensible parents would keep their children shut up in the house1 only allowing them to go out of doors for a few hours once a week1 for fear of contagion or contamination1 and yet this is just what the housewife has been doing for years with her household employees under the firm impression that she was protecting them as well as herself4 ,present statistics1 however1 upon the morality and immorality of women who belong to what is at present termed the servant class1 prove only too clearly that the protection provided by the employer's home does not protect4 ,the shelter thus given serves too often to encourage a life of deception1 especially as in reality the housewife knows but little of what takes place below stairs4 ,the servants' quarters are1 as a rule1 far enough away from the other rooms of the house for much to transpire there without the knowledge of the mistress of the house1 but who has not heard her complain of the misconduct of her employees8 ,startling discoveries have been made at the most unexpected times and from the most unexpected quarters4 ,one lady found her maid was in the habit of going out at night after the family had retired1 and leaving the front door unlocked in order to regain admittance in the early morning without arousing the family4 ,another housewife discovered one day that her cook's husband1 whose existence until then was unknown1 had been coming for several months to her house for his dinner4 ,every householder finds that in the late evening her servants entertain their numerous cousins and friends at her expense4 ,moreover1 they do not hesitate to use the best china1 glass1 and silver for special parties and draw upon the household supplies for the choicest meats and wines4 ,and because they cannot go out in the day time1 it is not unusual to find some friend or relative comes to spend the entire day with them1 and in consequence the housewife not only feeds her help but a string of hangers-on as well4 ,why should she be surprised that she does not get an adequate return for the amount of money she spends8 ,and these things take place1 not only during the temporary absence of the employer1 but even while she is sitting peacefully in the library and listening to a parlor lecture on the relations of capital and labor4 ,women say tearfully or bravely on such occasions3 ,what can be done to make servants better8 ,they are getting worse every day4 ,and the housewife 7one might almost call her by ,samuel ,pepys's pleasing phrase1 the poor wretch7 then pours out to any sympathetic ear endless recitals of aggravating1 worrying1 nerve-racking experiences4 ,instead of putting an end to such a regrettable state of affairs that would never be tolerated by any business employer1 she seems content to bewail her fate and clings still more steadfastly to obsolete methods4 ,why does she not adopt the methods of the business man in dealing with his employees8 ,the advisability of having household employees live outside their place of employment is so apparent that it ought to appeal to every one4 ,there would be no longer the necessity of putting aside and of furnishing certain rooms of the house for their accommodation3 a practice which in the majority of families is quite a serious inconvenience and always an expense4 ,in small homes where only one maid is kept1 it may not make much difference to give up one room to her1 but where several employees are needed1 it means very often that many rooms must be used as sleeping apartments for them1 frequently too a sitting room or a special dining room is given them4 ,this is not all1 for the rooms must be furnished and kept clean and warm1 and supplied with an unlimited amount of gas and electricity4 ,in many families the boarding and lodging of household employees cause as much anxiety and expense to the housewife as to provide for her own family4 ,and why does she do it8 ,why does she consent to take upon herself so much extra trouble for nothing8 ,for1 although she offers good food and a bed besides excellent wages to all who work for her1 she is the most poorly served of all employers to-day4 ,in the great feudal castles of the ,middle ,ages it was not deemed safe for women to venture forth alone1 even in the daytime1 and so those engaged in housework were naturally compelled to live under their ,master's roof1 eating at his table and sitting below the salt4 ,but the ,master and the ,serf of feudal times disappeared long ago1 only the ,mistress and her servants remain4 ,to-day1 however1 servants no longer sit at their employer's table2 they remain in the kitchen1 where as a rule they are given to eat what is left from the family meals4 ,some housewives1 from motives of kindness and consideration for the welfare of those in their employ1 have special meals prepared for them and served in a dining-room of their own at hours which do not conflict with the meals of the family4 ,but this does not always meet with gratitude or even due appreciation2 the disdainful way in which ,bridget often complains of the food too generously provided for her is well known4 ,a chambermaid came one day to her employer and said she did not wish to complain but thought it better to say frankly that she was not satisfied with what she was getting to eat in her house3 she wanted to have roast beef for dinner more often1 at least three or four times a week1 for she did not care to eat mutton1 nor steak1 and never ate pork1 nor could she1 to quote her own words fill up on bread and vegetables as the other girls did in the kitchen4 ,then1 and only then1 did her employer wake up with a start to the realization of the true position every housewife occupies in the eyes of her household employees4 ,they evidently regard her in the light of a caterer2 she does the marketing not only for her family but for them too4 ,she pays a cook high wages1 not only to cook meals for herself and family1 but for her employees also4 ,for the first time in her life1 this housewife asked herself the following questions3 ,why should she allow her household employees to live in her house8 ,why should she consent to board them at her expense8 ,why should she continue to place at their disposal a bedroom each1 a private bathroom1 a sitting room or a dining room8 ,why should she allow them to make use of her kitchen and laundry to do their own personal washing1 even providing them with soap and starch1 irons and an ironing board1 fuel and gas8 ,why should she do all this for them when no business employer1 man or woman1 ever does it8 ,was it simply because her mother1 her grandmother1 her great-grandmother had been in the habit of doing it8 ,this awakening was the beginning of the end of all the trouble and expense which she had endured for so many years in connection with the boarding and lodging of her servants4 ,to-day she has no servants2 she has household employees who come to her house each day1 just as other employees go each day to their place of employment4 ,they take no meals in her house1 and her housekeeping expenses have diminished as much as her own comfort has increased4 ,her employees are better and more efficient than any she ever had under the old rgime1 and nothing could persuade her to return to her former methods of housekeeping4 ,the cost of providing meals for domestic employees varies according to the mode of living of each individual family1 and of late it has been the subject of much discussion4 ,some important details1 however1 seem to be generally overlooked1 for the cost of the food is the only thing usually considered by the average housewife4 ,to this first expense must be added the cost of pots and pans for cooking purposes2 even under careful management1 kitchen utensils are bound to wear out and must be replaced4 ,then there is the cost of the extra fuel or gas or electricity required to cook the food1 nor must one forget to count the extra work of the cook to prepare the meals1 and of the kitchen maid or of some other maid to wash up the dishes after each meal served to employees4 ,there is also the expense of buying kitchen plates and dishes1 glasses1 cups and saucers1 knives and forks1 etc4 ,every housewife is in the habit of providing kitchenware for the use of her employees4 ,the total sum of all these items would astonish those who think that the actual expense of giving meals to household employees is not a very great one and is limited to the cost of the food they eat2 even this last expense is considerably augmented by the careless and wasteful way in which provisions are generally handled by those who do not have to pay for them4 ,when ways and means are discussed among housewives to reduce the present high cost of living1 it would be well to advise all women to try the experiment of having their household employees live outside their place of employment4 ,the result from an economic point of view alone is amazing1 and the relief it brings the housewife who is no longer obliged to provide food and sleeping accommodations for her employees is so great that one wonders why she has been willing to burden herself with these responsibilities for so many years4 ,there was once a time when women did not go out alone to eat in a restaurant1 but to-day one sees about as many women as men eating their midday meal in public4 ,if women engaged in general business prove themselves thus capable of self care1 there seems to be no reason why household employees1 who often receive higher wages than shop girls and stenographers1 should not be able to do the same4 ,they would enjoy their meals more outside1 albeit the food given them in their employer's house is undoubtedly of a better quality2 the change of surroundings and the opportunity of meeting friends1 of leaving their work behind them1 would compensate them4 ,in any event1 it is clearly proved by the scarcity of women applying for positions in private houses that these two advantages only to be obtained in domestic labor--board and lodging--do not attract the working woman of the present day4 ,the joy of eating the bread of independence is an old and deeply rooted feeling4 ,there is an ancient fable of sop about the ,dog and the ,wolf which portrays this sentiment in a very quaint and delightful manner4 7,sir ,roger l',estrange's translation47 ,,the ,,dog ,,and ,,the ,,wolf ,there was a ,hagged ,carrion of a ,wolf1 and a ,jolly ,sort of a ,gentile ,dog1 with ,good ,flesh upon's ,back1 that fell into ,company together upon the ,king's ,high-,way4 ,the ,wolf was wonderfully pleas'd with his ,companion1 and as ,inquisitive to ,learn how be brought himself to ,that ,blessed ,state of ,body4 ,why1 says the ,dog1 ,i keep my ,master's ,house from ,thieves1 and ,i have very ,good ,meat1 ,drink1 and ,lodging for my pains4 ,now if you'll go along with ,me1 and do as ,i do1 you may fare as ,i fare4 ,the ,wolf ,struck up the ,bargain1 and so away they ,trotted together3 ,but as they were ,jogging on1 the ,wolf spy'd a ,bare ,place about the ,dog's ,neck where the ,hair was worn off4 ,brother 7says he7 how comes this ,i prethee8 ,oh1 ,that's ,nothing1 says the ,dog1 but the ,fretting of my ,collar a little4 ,nay1 says ,t'other1 if there be a ,collar in the ,case1 ,i know ,better ,things than to sell my ,liberty for a ,crust4 ,,the ,,moral 444',tis a ,comfort to have ,good ,meat and ,drink at ,command1 and ,warm ,lodging3 ,but ,he that sells his ,freedom for the ,cramming of his ,belly1 has but a ,hard ,bargain of it4 ,in modern business enterprises1 there is hardly a single instance of an employer who is willing to board his employees1 nor would he consider for a moment the proposition of allowing them to remain at their place of employment all night and of providing sleeping accommodations for them4 ,neither in consideration of benefiting them1 nor with the view of benefiting himself by thus making sure of having them on hand for work early the next morning1 would he ever consent to such an arrangement4 ,when he needs some one to watch over his interests in the night time1 he engages a night watchman1 a very much more economical plan than to provide lodging for all his employees4 ,why should the housewife be the only employer to assume the burden of a double responsibility toward her employees8 ,perhaps in the country1 where it might be impossible for them to live outside her home1 such a necessity might arise1 but in cities and suburban towns1 there is absolutely no valid reason why household employees should sleep1 eat1 and live under their employer's roof4 ,it is a custom only1 and truly a custom that would be more honored in the breach than in the observance4 ,,housework ,,limited ,,to ,,eight ,,hours ,a ,,day ,in the home woman's work is said to be never ended4 ,if this be true1 it is the fault of the woman who plans the work1 for in all the positions of life1 work can be carried on indefinitely if badly planned4 ,it is the essential thesis of this little volume that the domestic labor of women should be limited to a fixed number of hours per day in private houses4 ,it is not unusual at the present day for a woman to work twelve1 or fourteen hours a day1 or even longer1 when she earns her living as a household employee4 ,a man's mental and physical forces begin to wane at the end of eight1 nine1 or ten hours of constant application to the same work1 and a woman's strength is not greater than a man's4 ,the truth of the proposition1 abstractly considered1 has been long acknowledged and nowadays requires no argument4 ,when a woman accepts a position in business1 she is told exactly how many hours a day she must work1 but when a woman is engaged to fill a domestic position in a family1 the number of hours she is expected to give her employer is never specified4 ,she is simply told that she must be on duty early in the morning before the family arises1 and that she may consider herself off duty as soon as the family for whom she is working has withdrawn for the night4 ,is it surprising that under such conditions working women are not very enthusiastic over the domestic proposition to-day8 ,a household employee ought to have her hours of work as clearly defined as if she were a business employee1 and there is no reason why the eight-hour labor law could not be applied as successfully to housework as to any other enterprise4 ,work in business is generally divided into two periods4 ,yet this division can not always be effected1 and in railroad and steamship positions1 in post offices1 upon trolley lines1 in hotels1 in hospitals1 and in other cases too numerous to mention1 where work must follow a continuous round1 the working hours are divided into more than two periods1 according to the nature of the work and the interests of the employer1 not however exceeding a fixed number of hours per day or per week4 ,it would be far better for the housewife as well as for her employees1 if the housework were limited in a similar way4 ,but with the introduction of the eight-hour law in the home1 certain new conditions would have to be rigidly enforced in order to ensure success4 ,firstly1 the employee should be made to understand that during the eight hours of work agreed upon1 she must be engaged in actual work for her employer4 ,secondly1 when an employee is off duty1 she should not be allowed to remain with or to talk to the other employee or employees who are still on duty4 ,when her work is finished1 she ought to leave her employer's house4 ,the non-observance of either of these two points produces a demoralizing effect4 ,thirdly1 a general knowledge of cooking1 and serving meals1 of cleaning and taking proper care of the rooms of a house1 of attending correctly to the telephone and the door bell1 of sewing1 of washing and ironing1 and of taking care of children1 should be insisted upon from all household employees4 ,there are many housewives who will state that this last condition is impossible1 that it is asking too much from one employee2 and since it is hard to-day to find a good cook1 it will be still harder to find one who understands other household work as well4 ,but those who jump to these conclusions have never tried the experiment4 ,it is not only possible but practicable4 ,judging from the ordinary intelligence displayed by the average cook and housemaid in the majority of private homes to-day1 it ought not to seem incredible that the duties of both could be easily mastered by young women of ordinary ability4 ,a woman who knows how to prepare and cook a meal1 may easily learn the correct way of serving it1 and the possession of this knowledge ought not to prevent her from being capable of sweeping a room1 or making a bed1 or taking care of children4 ,it is above all in families where only a few employees are kept1 that the housewife will quickly realize how much it is to her immediate advantage to employ women who know how to do all kinds of housework1 instead of having those who make a specialty of one particular branch4 ,the specialization of work in private houses has been carried to such an extreme that it has become one of the greatest drawbacks to successful housekeeping in small families4 ,under this system of specialization1 a household employee is not capable in emergency of taking up satisfactorily the work of another4 ,even if she be able to do it1 she often professes ignorance for fear it may prolong her own hours of labor1 or because1 as she sometimes frankly admits1 she does not consider it her place4 ,the chambermaid does not know how to cook1 the cook does not know how to do the chamberwork1 the waitress1 in her turn1 can do neither cooking nor chamberwork1 and the annoyance to the whole family caused by the temporary absence of one of its regular employees is enough to spoil for the time being all the traditional comforts of home4 ,in hotels and public institutions1 and in large private establishments1 where the work demands a numerous staff of employees1 the specialization of the work is the only means for its successful accomplishment1 but in the average home requiring from one to four or five employees no system could be worse from an economic point of view1 nor less conducive to the comfort of the family4 ,specialization produces another bad effect1 for it prevents the existence of the feeling of equality among employees in the same house4 ,each specialist speaks rather disparagingly of the other's work1 regardless of the relative position her own special art may occupy to the unprejudiced mind4 ,an amusing instance of this was recently shown at a country place near ,new ,york1 when the lady of the manor asked a friend to send some one down from the city to help with the housework during the temporary absence of her maid4 ,the friend could not find any one at the domestic employment agencies willing to go1 but at last through the ,charity ,organization ,society1 she heard of a woman temporarily out of employment1 who had been frequently employed as scrubwoman on the vacation piers4 ,when the work was offered her1 she accepted it immediately4 ,arriving at her new employer's house1 she began at once to scrub the floors1 and when the work was completed1 she sat on a chair and took no further notice of anything4 ,the next day1 having no more floors to scrub1 the same general lack of interest was manifested4 ,she was asked to wash the dishes after dinner4 ,she replied that she was not used to dishwashing1 and did not know how to do it4 ,she was persuaded1 however1 to make the attempt1 but performed her new task very reluctantly4 ,the following morning she said she felt lonely and would return at once to the city4 ,as the train came in sight to bear her back to her accustomed surroundings1 she gave a snort of relief1 and exclaimed3 ,i'm a scrubwoman1 ,i am4 ,i ain't going to do no fancy dishwashing1 no1 not for no one2 ,i'm a scrubwoman4 ,and she clambered up into the train with the alacrity of a woman whose dignity had received a hard blow4 ,the above illustration is typical of the spirit subjected to the system of specialization1 and shows how unwise it is to encourage it in the home where all branches of housework could be easily made interchangeable4 ,under the new system of limiting housework to eight hours a day1 the housewife must insist that all applicants be willing and able to perform any part of the housework she may assign1 and their duties ought not to be specified otherwise than by the term ,,housework4 ,the employee who refuses to wait on the table during the absence of the waitress1 or to cook1 or to do the laundry work1 or to answer the telephone1 or to carry packages from her employer's automobile to the library1 because she does not consider it her place to do these things1 should be instantly discharged4 ,these very important conditions being understood and conceded1 the choice and arrangement of the eight hours' work must necessarily lie with each individual housewife4 ,each family is different and has different claims upon its time4 ,the rush hours of social life are sometimes in the evening1 and sometimes in the afternoon1 and again in some families1 especially where there are small children1 the breakfast hour seems the most complicated of the day4 ,all these details have to be carefully thought of when making an eight hour schedule4 ,at the end of this book a set of schedules is placed4 ,any intelligent housewife can understand them1 imitate them1 and in many instances improve them4 ,they are merely given as elementary examples4 ,according to the number of employees she engages1 the housewife will have eight1 sixteen1 or twenty-four hours of work to distribute among them1 and to meet her peculiar needs she will find it necessary at the outset to devote some hours to a satisfactory scheme4 ,after testing several1 she will probably have to begin all over again before she finally succeeds in evolving one that is available4 ,but the problem is interesting in itself1 and always admits of a solution4 ,it may not be amiss to make this final suggestion for the woman who is willing to give the new plan a fair trial3 she should follow the example of the business man when he is in need of new employees1 and advertise for help1 stating hours of work1 and requesting that all applications be made by letter4 ,this disposes rapidly of the illiterate1 and in the majority of cases1 a woman who writes a good1 legible1 and accurate hand1 is more apt to be efficient in her work than one who sends in a dirty1 careless1 ill-expressed and badly spelled application4 ,through advertising one comes into touch with many women it would be impossible to reach otherwise4 ,it is also the most advantageous way of bringing the employer and employee together1 inasmuch as it dispenses entirely with the services of a third person1 who1 naturally can not be expected to offer gratuitous service4 ,the plan of limiting housework to eight hours a day is not an idle theory2 it has been in successful operation for several years4 ,yet it is not easy to change the habit of years4 ,there are many housewives who would loudly declare it impossible to conform to such business rules in the household2 and many of the older generation of cooks and housemaids would agree4 ,but when such a plan has been generally adopted1 the domestic labor problem will be solved1 and it does not appear that in the present state of social organization1 it can be solved in any other way4 ,,housework ,,limited ,,to ,,six ,,days ,a ,,week ,under the present system of housekeeping1 there is not one day out of the three hundred and sixty-five that a domestic employee has the right to claim as a day of rest1 not even a legal holiday4 ,it is remarkable that this fact1 showing so forcibly one of the greatest disadvantages connected with housework1 should attract so little attention4 ,no one seems to care about the fate of the servant girl1 as she is so often disdainfully called4 ,during six days of the week she works on the average fourteen hours a day1 but no one stops to notice that she is tired4 ,on the seventh day1 instead of resting as every other employee has the right to do1 her work is merely reduced to nine1 eight1 or perhaps seven hours2 and yet she needs a day of rest as much as every other woman who earns her bread4 ,the rights of the domestic employee are ignored on all sides apparently4 ,in public demonstrations of dissatisfaction between employers and employees the most oppressed class of the working people--the women who do housework--has never yet been represented4 ,this is probably due to two causes3 the first is because women dissatisfied with housework are rapidly finding positions in business where they enjoy rights and privileges denied them in domestic labor2 and the second is because the great majority of women engaged in housework are foreign-born4 ,these women learn quickly to understand and speak ,english1 but they do not often read and write it1 and as they are kept in close confinement in their employer's house1 they have rarely the opportunity of hearing about the emancipation of the modern working woman4 ,most of them are of a very humble origin1 and being debarred from business positions on account of their ignorance and inexperience1 they are thankful to earn money in any kind of employment regardless of the length of working hours4 ,their children1 however1 who are ,american born and enjoy better educational advantages1 do not follow in their footsteps when the time comes for them to earn their living4 ,they become stenographers1 typewriters1 dressmakers1 milliners1 shirt waist makers1 cash-girls1 saleswomen1 etc42 in fact any occupation where work is limited to a fixed number of hours a day and confined to six days a week1 is considered more desirable than housework4 ,the result is that the housewife is compelled to take for her employees only those who are rejected by every other employer2 the capable1 independent1 intelligent ,american woman is hardly ever seen in domestic service4 ,in ,washington1 ,d4,c41 a law 7the ,la ,follette ,eight ,hour ,law for ,women in the ,district of ,columbia7 was recently passed limiting to eight hours a day and six days a week practically all work in which women are industrially employed2 hotel servants are included under the provisions of this law1 but domestic servants in private homes are expressly excluded4 ,if this new law be considered a just and humane measure for women who are business employees1 and if business houses be compelled to observe it1 one naturally wonders why it should not prove to be an equally just and humane law for women who work in private families1 and why should not the home be compelled to observe it too8 ,instead of being a barrier to progress1 the home ought to coperate with the state in the enforcement of laws for the amelioration of the condition of working women4 ,the home1 being presided over by a woman1 presumably of some education and intelligence1 should be a most fitting place in which to apply a law designed to protect women against excessive hours of labor4 ,why should housework in private homes be an exception to all other work8 ,is it because some housewives say1 in self justification and frequently without an accurate knowledge of what it is to do housework week after week without one day's release1 that housework is easier than other work8 ,is it easier8 ,is it not sometimes harder8 ,however1 it is not a question of housework being harder or easier than other work1 but of the desirability of having it limited to eight hours a day and six days a week4 ,why should the housewife be allowed to remain in such a state of apathy in regard to the physical welfare of her household employees8 ,six days shalt thou labor has all the sanction of scripture1 of morals1 and of common experience4 ,it is only fair that women who work in private families should have one day out of seven as a day of rest1 even as their more fortunate sisters in the business world4 ,if by adopting such a law in the home the housewife found that her work was performed far more efficiently and willingly than at present1 would it not be as much to her advantage as to the advantage of those she employs to limit the hours of household labor to six days a week8 ,many housewives may object to this proposition inasmuch as the work in a home can not be suspended even for a day4 ,but when two or more employees work in a private home1 it is very easy to plan the housework so that each employee may have a different day of the week as a day of rest1 without the comfort of the family being disturbed by the temporary absence of one of the employees4 ,it is only in families where one employee is kept that it may make a very serious difference to the housewife when her maid-of-all-work is away for one entire day each week4 ,nevertheless the comfort of an employer ought not to outweigh justice to an employee4 ,there are many ways of regulating the housework1 as will be seen in the schedules at the end of this book1 in order to give one day of freedom each week to household employees without causing much inconvenience to the housewife4 ,by continuing to refuse this privilege to women employed in domestic labor1 housekeeping is becoming more and more complicated4 ,already it is such a common occurrence in some cities and in many parts of the country1 not to find any woman willing to do housework1 that many housewives are beginning to think that their future comfort in all household matters will depend entirely upon new labor saving devices and upon the help of the community rather than upon the increased knowledge and skill of domestic employees4 ,there exists a prevailing impression1 too1 that housework has lost its dignity1 and that at this period of the world's social history1 it is impossible to restore it for women have stepped above it4 ,but this is not true4 ,the fact is that housework has remained stationary while other work has gained in freedom and dignity4 ,without noisy protestations1 or indignant speeches delivered in public1 women have slowly and silently1 one by one1 deserted housework as a career on account of the narrowing1 servile1 and unjust conditions inseparable from it at the present day4 ,let these conditions be removed and new regulations based upon modern business principles take their place1 and then it will be seen that housework has never lost its dignity1 and the very women who abandoned it will be the first to choose it again as a means of earning their livelihood4 ,as a proof of this1 the following experience may be cited of a ,new ,work woman who wished to obtain a domestic employee for general housework4 ,she went to several employment agencies and at the end of a week she had seen four applicants2 three were foreigners and spoke ,english so brokenly that they could never have been left in charge of a telephone4 ,not one of the four was worth considering after investigating their references1 and these were the only women she could find willing to do general housework4 ,upon the advice of a friend1 the perplexed housewife advertised in one of the daily newspapers1 but only a few women applied for the position and these were far from being satisfactory4 ,she then inserted another advertisement expressed in the following words3 ,wanted3 a young woman to help with housework1 eight hours a day1 six days a week1 sleep home4 ,apply by letter only4 ,this last clause was added to prevent any one from applying for the position who could not write ,english1 as it was absolutely necessary that the person engaged to do the housework should be capable of attending correctly to the telephone4 ,on the same day the advertisement appeared1 eighty-five applications by letter were received1 and twenty more came the following day4 ,all who wrote expressed their willingness to fill the position of a domestic employee and to do anything in the way of housework under the new conditions specified in the advertisement4 ,only one stated she would do no washing4 ,many who replied to this advertisement had occupied positions1 which according to the present standard1 were far superior to housework2 many1 too1 were married women1 experienced in all household work1 and most anxious to accept a position in a private family1 a position that did not break up their own home life4 ,the housewife was bewildered by the unexpected result of her advertisement3 the tables were turned at last4 ,instead of being one of many looking in vain for a good domestic employee1 she found that she had now the advantage of being able to choose from more than a hundred applicants one who would best suit her own peculiar needs4 ,the same advertisement has been inserted at different times and has always brought the same remarkable result3 from one hundred to one hundred and sixty answers each time4 ,it is true that all who present themselves may not be efficient1 but efficiency speedily comes to the front when upon it alone depends a desirable position4 ,two very important facts came to light through the help of this advertisement2 one was to find so many women eager to do housework when it was limited to eight hours a day and six days a week1 and the other was to hear that they were willing to board and lodge themselves1 as well as work1 for the same wages that servants are accustomed to receive1 although to the latter the housewife invariably gives gratis all food and sleeping accommodations4 ,these two facts alone prove beyond a doubt that by applying business principles to housework all objections to it as a means of earning a livelihood are removed4 ,it is quite likely that for a time the old fashioned mistress1 and the old fashioned servant will continue to cling to past customs2 but once it is proved that domestic labor limited to eight hours a day and six days a week1 brings a better1 more intelligent1 more efficient class of employees to the home1 the most obdurate employer will change her mind4 ,no legislation is needed4 ,if all who are trying to solve the servant question will begin to practice the new plan in their own homes1 the future will take care of itself and the old ways will die a natural death4 ,,the ,,observance ,,of ,,legal ,,holidays ,,in ,,the ,,home ,the pleasure brought by the advent of a holiday into the lives of the working people can hardly be overestimated1 and it is doubtful if holidays would ever have become legalized had they not proved of distinct value to the masses4 ,to have one day each week free from the steady grind of one's dally work is a great relief1 but to have a holiday is something still better1 for it usually means a day set apart for general rejoicing4 ,why do all housewives persistently disregard the right of the household employee to have legal holidays8 ,the reason generally brought forward is that many families need their employees more on a holiday than on any other day4 ,in many cases this is quite true on account of family reunions or the entertaining of friends1 but very often the housewife could easily dispense with the services of her employees on a holiday4 ,she does not do it1 however1 or only occasionally1 because it is not the custom to grant holidays to women who work in private homes4 ,if it be impossible1 on account of the exigencies of home life1 to grant all legal holidays to household employees1 there are many different ways of planning the housework so that other days may be given instead4 ,sometimes the day before or the day after a holiday will give as much pleasure as the day itself4 ,a woman who is at the head of a home has many opportunities of coming into close contact with her employees2 she can easily ascertain their wishes in this respect and act accordingly4 ,it is more the fact of being entitled to a holiday than to have it on a certain day that ought to be emphasized4 ,domestic employees would be benefited by having these extra days of liberty1 just as much as all other employees4 ,a trial is all that is necessary to show how much better a household employee will work after having a holiday4 ,she returns to her duties with renewed strength and the knowledge that she is no longer forced to play the rle of ,cinderella gives her a fresh interest in life4 ,unfortunately the housewife has been accustomed for so many years to have her servants work for her all day long on every day of the week1 with only a few hours off duty on every other ,sunday and on every other ,thursday1 that she is rather inclined to resent such an innovation as the observance of legal holidays in domestic labor4 ,she fails to perceive that by her present attitude she shows herself in a very unfavorable light as an employer1 for the lack of holidays is decidedly one of the reasons for which housework is shunned to-day4 ,business men have evolved a satisfactory and workable plan by which their employees are neither overworked nor deprived of all legal holidays1 although frequently the work they are engaged in can not be suspended day or night even for an hour4 ,it remains for women of the leisure class1 and to this class belong all those who can afford to pay to have their housework done for them1 to adopt a similar plan in their homes4 ,,extra ,,pay ,,for ,,overtime ,when the plan for limiting housework to eight hours a day is discussed for the first time1 the following question invariably arises3 ,what is to be done when anything unusual happens to break the routine of the regular work1 as for instance1 when sickness occurs1 when friends arrive unexpectedly1 when a dinner party is given8 ,sickness1 of course1 is unavoidable1 but as a rule a trained nurse or an extra household assistant is called in to help4 ,many times1 however1 this is not absolutely necessary1 or perhaps the family can not afford to have outside help1 and the extra work caused by sickness usually falls upon the domestic employee whose hours of labor are more or less prolonged in consequence4 ,what ought to be done in such an event8 ,there is but one answer3 ,work that can not be accomplished within the regular working hours already agreed upon should be paid for as overtime4 ,when it is a question of work being prolonged beyond the eight hours a day by the entertaining of friends1 one can only say that this ought not to happen if the housewife planned her working schedule carefully4 ,she alone is responsible for her social engagements2 she alone can make a schedule that will enable her to have her friends come to luncheon or dinner without prolonging the day's work beyond the hours agreed upon between herself and her employees4 ,when friends arrive unexpectedly1 however1 or when a dinner party or a big social function takes place in the home1 an eight hour schedule may be the cause of great inconvenience1 unless a previous agreement has been made to meet just such occasions4 ,it is certain that some compensation is due to all domestic employees for the extra long hours of work caused by unusual events in the home life of their employers1 and many ways have been devised already to remunerate them4 ,in modern social life a custom of long standing still exists which makes it almost compulsory for this remuneration to come out of the pocket1 not of the hostess1 but of her guests4 ,the unfortunate custom of giving tips is not generally criticised very openly1 but when viewed in the light of reason and justice1 it seems to be a very poor way of trying to remove one of the present hardships connected with domestic labor4 ,why should the housewife depend upon the generosity of her guests to help her pay her household employees8 ,she never demurs at the extra expense entailed in giving luncheons and dinners in her friends' honor1 nor in taking them to places of interest and amusement4 ,why then should she object to giving a little more money to her household employees upon whose work the success of her hospitality so largely depends8 ,there are many women who entertain extensively1 but they never recompense a household employee for any extra work that may be demanded from her on that account4 ,they consider themselves fully justified in exacting extra long hours of work because of the high wages they pay1 especially as it frequently happens that while the work is more on some days1 it is less on others1 and they think in consequence that their employees have no cause for complaint4 ,it is a mistake1 however1 to think that an employee who is obliged to be on duty and has little or nothing to do on one day1 is really compensated for the extra hours of work she has been compelled to give on other days4 ,a saleswoman who on certain days has no customers or only a few1 is just as much on duty as if her work filled all her time1 and it is the same with a domestic employee4 ,indeed it is generally conceded to be more irksome to remain idle at one's post than to be actively engaged in work4 ,but on the other hand1 there are many housewives who feel that they ought to give their employees more pay for extra work especially when it is connected with the entertaining of friends1 and the following ways of rewarding them have been tried with more or less success4 ,one plan that gained favor with several families was to give ten cents to the cook and ten cents to the waitress every time a guest was invited to a meal3 ten cents for each guest4 ,at the end of a month the ten cent pieces had amounted to quite a sum of money4 ,another plan that was tried in a small family was to give fifty cents to the cook and fifty cents to each of the two waitresses for every dinner party that took place1 regardless of the number of guests4 ,still another plan was to give at the end of the month1 a two dollar1 five dollar1 or ten dollar bill to an employee who had given many extra hours of satisfactory work to her employer4 ,all these plans are good in a certain sense1 inasmuch as they show that women are awakening to the realization that some compensation is due to household employees for the extra long hours of work frequently unavoidable in family life4 ,but unfortunately these plans lack stability1 for they depend altogether upon the generosity and kindness of different employers1 instead of upon a just and firmly established business principle4 ,and now comes the question3 ,what method of payment for overtime will produce a permanently satisfactory result8 ,the only one that appears just and is applicable to all cases is to pay each employee one and a half times as much per hour for extra work as for regular work4 ,in this way each employee is paid for overtime in just proportion to the value of her regular services4 ,for instance1 when a household employee receives #bj1 #cj1 or #dj per month1 that is to say #e1 #g4ej1 or #aj per week1 for working eight hours a day and six days a week1 she is receiving approximately #aj1 #ae1 or #bj cents per hour for her regular work4 ,by giving her one and one half times as much for extra work1 she ought to receive #ae1 #bb-a_/b1 or #cj cents per hour for every hour she works for her employer after the completion of her regular eight hours' work4 ,this plan has never failed to bring satisfaction1 and it has the advantage of placing the employer and the employee on an equally delightful footing of independence4 ,the performance of extra work is no longer regarded as a matter of obligation on one side1 and of concession on the other1 but as a purely business transaction4 ,some housewives fear that the regular work would be intentionally prolonged beyond all measure if it became an established rule to pay extra for work performed overtime4 ,this could be easily checked1 however1 by paying extra only for work that was necessitated by unusual events in the family life4 ,in families where only one employee is kept1 naturally the occasions for asking her to work overtime arise more frequently than in families where there are two or more employees1 especially if there be small children in the family4 ,yet these occasions need not come very often1 if the housewife bears in mind that even with only one employee1 she has eight hours every day at her own disposal2 she ought to plan her outside engagements accordingly4 ,her liberty from household cares during these eight hours can only be gained though by having efficient and trustworthy assistants in her home1 and she can never obtain these unless she abandons her old fashioned methods of housekeeping4 ,she must grant to household employees the same rights and privileges given to business employees2 she must apply business principles to housework4 ,a great power lies in the hands of the modern housewife1 a power as yet only suspected by a few1 which1 if properly wielded1 can raise housework from its present undignified position to the place it ought to occupy1 and that is in the foremost rank of manual labor for women4 ,,part ,,iii ,,eight ,,hour ,,schedules ,,in ,,the ,,home ,eight hour schedules for one employee4 ,eight hour schedules for two employees4 ,eight hour schedules for three employees4 ,,eight ,,hour ,,schedules ,,for ,,one ,,employee ,the schedules given in the following pages have been in actual practice for a sufficient length of time to prove that they can be relied on to produce satisfactory results1 although no doubt many housewives will find that some of them must be modified to meet special requirements in their homes4 ,two very important points must always be borne in mind in order to obtain the greatest advantage from an eight hour schedule1 especially in families where only one employee is engaged to do the housework4 ,the first point is this3 the housewife ought only to make her working schedule after she has carefully studied her own comfort and convenience in regard to the hours she considers the most important of the day for her to have help in her housework4 ,the second point is for the housewife to reserve for herself the entire freedom of the eight hours during which her employee is on duty1 for then she can place1 or she ought to be able to1 the full responsibility of the housekeeping upon her employee4 ,by adhering strictly to these two points1 the housewife will soon perceive that she can dispense with the services of her employee for the remaining hours of the day without much inconvenience to herself or her family4 ,she may even find it more pleasant than otherwise to be relieved from the sight and sound of household work1 for at least a few hours a day1 when she is in her own home4 ,possibly the housewife who has but one employee will not accept with alacrity the proposition of allowing her to be off duty for an entire day once a week1 for unless she be willing to do the necessary work herself on that day1 she must engage a special person to take the place of her regular employee4 ,but many families engage a woman to come once a week to help with the washing and house-cleaning1 especially when they have only one household employee4 ,if this woman came on the day the regular employee was away1 she could relieve the housewife of all the housework that could not be postponed until the next day4 ,,schedule ,,no4 ,i ,when only one employee is engaged in a private home1 her services are needed more at meal time than at any other time of the day1 especially if small children are in the family4 ,as the hours for the three principal meals are about the same everywhere1 the following schedule is a very useful one4 ,from #g ,a4,m4 to #aj ,a4,m4 #c hours ,from #ab ,m4 to #c ,p4,m4 #c hours ,from #f ,p4,m4 to #h ,p4,m4 #b hours ------- #h hours ,in the morning from seven to ten o'clock1 the employee had ample time to prepare and serve breakfast and wash up the dishes afterwards1 and do the chamberwork4 ,the three hours from noon until three o'clock were filled with duties that varied considerably each day4 ,luncheon was served at one o'clock2 it was but a light meal easy to cook and easy to serve1 therefore the time from two to three o'clock was usually devoted to ironing1 or mending1 or cleaning silver1 or polishing brasses1 or preparing some of the dishes in advance either for dinner that evening or for luncheon the next day4 ,two hours were sufficient to cook and serve dinner and wash up the dishes afterwards4 ,a woman came once a week1 on the day the employee was off duty1 to do the family washing and assist with the general housework4 ,she also did some of the ironing2 the rest of the ironing was done the next day by the regular employee4 ,this schedule has been tested1 not merely once for a few months1 but several times1 and not with the same employee1 but with different employees1 and it has always been most satisfactory4 ,it may seem doubtful to those who have never had their housework done on schedule time that the work can be completed in the time stated1 but the greatest incentive that an employee can have to work quickly and well1 is to know that her position is as good as any she can find elsewhere1 and that when her work is over she is free to do exactly as she pleases with the remainder of her time4 ,,schedule ,,no4 ,,ii ,the following schedule is very different from the preceding one1 inasmuch as the housewife did not consider it necessary for her employee to be on duty in the middle of the day4 ,there were no children in this family and as the housewife was alone in the day time1 she very frequently went out for luncheon4 ,she concluded therefore that it was the best time of the day for her to dispense with the services of her employee1 whose working hours were arranged thus3 ,from #g3cj ,a4,m4 to #aa3cj ,a4,m4 #d hours ,from #d3cj ,p4,m4 to #h3cj ,p4,m4 #d hours ------- #h hours ,by half past eleven in the morning1 all the usual housework was finished1 and the employee went home2 she returned at half past four in the afternoon1 in time to attend to five o'clock tea and dinner4 ,once a week1 on alternate ,saturdays and ,sundays1 she had a day of rest4 ,on these days the housewife got breakfast ready herself1 after which she did as much or as little of the regular work as she chose4 ,it is not difficult to reduce housework to a minimum on special occasions4 ,the family1 which was a small one1 consisting of three adults1 usually went out to dinner on these alternate ,saturdays and ,sundays4 ,,schedule ,,no4 ,,iii ,in this schedule1 the employee's work is divided into two periods1 with one hour for rest between4 ,the family consisted of a man and his wife1 who lived in an apartment4 ,the hours of work were as follows3 ,from #ab ,m4 to #c ,p4,m4 #c hours ,from #d ,p4,m4 to #i ,p4,m4 #e hours ------- #h hours ,the housewife was very fond of entertaining1 and she chose an employee who was an excellent cook and a very good waitress4 ,in consequence she was able to place the entire responsibility of luncheons and dinners on her1 and on days when no guests were present all the house-cleaning was done4 ,as the employee did not report on duty before noon1 the housewife was obliged to get breakfast herself4 ,however this was a very simple matter1 for her employee always set the table for breakfast the night before4 ,the next morning it was very easy for the housewife1 with the aid of an electric heater on the breakfast table1 to heat the cereal1 boil the water for the coffee1 and broil the bacon or scramble the eggs1 or indeed to prepare any of the usual breakfast dishes4 ,the employee did all the washing1 ironing and mending each week1 and although she came to her work only at noon1 she accomplished as much work during her eight hours as if she began earlier in the day4 ,,schedule ,,no4 ,,iv ,many schedules were tried before a really satisfactory one was finally chosen for a family of six3 mother1 father1 four small children4 ,the eldest child was seven years old1 and there was only one household employee to help with the work4 ,they lived in the country1 and breakfast had to be served promptly at #g3cj ,a4,m41 on account of taking the early morning train to town4 ,naturally1 with only one employee1 the housewife was compelled to do some of the housework herself1 and until the following schedule was adopted1 she had been in the habit of rising early1 dressing the children1 and getting breakfast ready herself4 ,her employee arrived later in the day and remained until after dinner at night4 ,the comfort and general welfare of the mother were increased to such a remarkable degree by the new schedule1 however1 that it is well worth special attention4 ,the hours were as follows3 ,from #f3cj ,a4,m4 to #aj3cj ,a4,m4 #d hours ,from #aa3cj ,a4,m4 to #c3cj ,p4,m4 #d hours ------- #h hours ,immediately upon arriving at the house1 the employee went to the children and took complete charge of all of them4 ,the two oldest dressed themselves1 but of course the other two required help4 ,after dressing them1 she prepared breakfast4 ,the cereal was always cooked the day before1 and as a gas stove was used for cooking purposes1 it was not hard to have breakfast ready promptly every morning at #g3cj4 ,then the employee1 having had her own breakfast before leaving her home1 worked steadily until #aj3cj ,a4,m4 ,during this time1 the only work the mother felt she ought to do was to go out with her two youngest children2 the other two went to school4 ,she was always home again by #aj3cj1 when her employee stopped working4 ,the employee lived too far away to go home for lunch1 and as there was no place in the neighborhood where she could go for lunch1 she always brought it with her and ate it in her employer's house4 ,during the hour she was off duty1 the mother attended to some household duties herself1 and she also bathed the two children1 and put them to bed for their morning nap4 ,at #aa3cj1 her employee reappeared on duty1 and took full charge of the house and children until #c3cj ,p4,m42 her work for the day was then over and she went home4 ,this schedule makes the mother stay home after half past three1 but by that time all the real housework had been done by her employee4 ,to give the children their supper and to put them to bed leisurely1 was much easier work than to rise early and dress them hurriedly in the morning1 and to get breakfast ready for the entire family4 ,it was not much trouble to get dinner herself in the evening for her husband and herself only4 ,the house was quiet1 the children asleep1 and there was no necessity of hurrying as in the morning4 ,when she wished to give a dinner party1 or to receive her friends1 or to go to any entertainment in the afternoon after #c3cj1 she asked her employee to give her extra hours of work for which she paid extra4 ,once a week her employee had a day of rest1 and on this day another woman was engaged to take her place4 ,this schedule enabled the mother to have many hours each day absolutely free from the children and household cares4 ,,eight ,,hour ,,schedules ,,for ,,two ,,employees ,it is much easier to plan an eight hour schedule for two employees than for one1 and there is no limit to the number of different ways in which the sixteen hours of work may be divided1 subdivided1 and arranged to please the individual housewife4 ,with two employees1 it is no longer necessary for the housewife to remain at home while one is off duty1 even for an hour1 for one relieves the other without any cessation of work4 ,even on the seventh day1 the day of rest1 the housewife can always arrange to have her work done without doing it herself1 in spite of the absence of one of her employees4 ,when a schedule is finally agreed upon1 however1 it must be rigidly enforced1 for it is more important to keep to the hours specified when there are two employees than when there is only one4 ,although the housewife may be tempted to claim the privilege of changing her hours very often to please herself1 since she is the employer1 if she value her peace of mind1 she will refrain from doing it4 ,only when the inevitable1 the unforeseen1 occurs should she make a change in her regular schedule4 ,when one employee is off duty all day1 the other employee can remain on duty the entire day2 naturally this plan necessitates more than eight hours of work on that day1 probably two or three more hours1 but if on the day after or the day before1 the employee be allowed to work two or three hours less than eight hours1 the average of eight hours a day and six days a week is maintained4 ,another example of what the housewife can do when one of her employees is off duty the entire day1 is to make her other employee follow schedule ,no4 #a4 ,this enables her to keep to eight hours a day and at the same time the housewife does none of the housework herself4 ,,schedule ,,no4 ,v ,with two employees it is a wise plan to arrange a schedule that makes the work of one employee commence the moment the work of the other ceases4 ,this tends to promote punctuality without requiring special supervision on the part of the housewife4 ,the following schedule is admirably adapted to the every day life of the average family with two employees3 ,first ,employee ,from #g ,a4,m4 to #aa ,a4,m4 #d hours ,from #ab ,m4 to #d ,p4,m4 #d hours ------- #h hours ,second ,employee ,from #aa ,a4,m4 to #c ,p4,m4 #d hours ,from #d ,p4,m4 to #h ,p4,m4 #d hours ------- #h hours ,all the washing1 ironing1 and mending of the family were done by the two employees1 and they also took care of the children when necessary4 ,besides being good cooks1 they were both excellent waitresses2 in consequence it made no difference which one was on duty at meal time4 ,one employee only was in charge of breakfast2 she came at seven o'clock in the morning1 and worked steadily until eleven o'clock1 when the second employee arrived4 ,she then went out for her lunch1 returning at twelve1 and remaining on duty until four o'clock in the afternoon4 ,she was then free for the remainder of the day4 ,the second employee1 as soon as she arrived at #aa ,a4,m41 went through the house and finished any work that was not completed by the first employee4 ,she worked without stopping until #c ,p4,m41 then went away for her lunch2 she returned at #d ,p4,m4 to relieve the first employee whose work was over at four o'clock4 ,the second employee remained on duty until #h ,p4,m42 she cooked and served dinner so quickly and efficiently that the housewife who had always been accustomed to have two employees1 a cook and a waitress1 on duty for dinner every night1 found to her great surprise that one efficient household employee1 working on schedule time1 accomplished in the same time the work of two of her former servants4 ,,schedule ,,no4 ,,vi ,in this schedule the housewife wanted both her employees to help her with her two children4 ,with this end in view1 she made all the work of the house interchange with the care of the children2 in consequence when one employee was off duty1 the other could always be relied on to help with the children4 ,this proved to be a very successful schedule1 for it relieved the mother from being obliged to sit in the nursery as she was compelled to do every time her former nurse went downstairs to her meals1 or had her afternoon off4 ,but when the mother wished to be with her children1 and that was very often1 the employee who was in the nursery at the time1 left the room immediately to attend to other household duties4 ,both employees were on duty at #g ,a4,m41 a most necessary arrangement where there are small children in a family4 ,the first employee prepared and served breakfast for the family1 while the other employee took full charge of the children1 giving them their breakfast in the nursery1 and taking them out afterwards for a walk4 ,at #aj ,a4,m41 she returned with the children1 and she was then off duty for two hours4 ,the mother generally chose this time to be with her children2 if however1 she had any other engagement1 the first employee was on duty until noon and could be called upon to look after them4 ,first ,employee ,from #g ,a4,m4 to #ab ,m4 #e hours ,from #e ,p4,m4 to #h ,p4,m4 #c hours ------- #h hours ,second ,employee ,from #g ,a4,m4 to #aj ,a4,m4 #c hours ,from #ab ,m4 to #e ,p4,m4 #e hours ------- #h hours ,,schedule ,,no4 ,,vii ,there are many families who may object to all the preceding schedules on account of the early hour in the evening for household employees to be off duty4 ,when the housewife has never had her housework done on schedule time by an efficient employee1 she may well think it impossible to have the dinner dishes washed up and everything put away in order by #h ,p4,m4 ,however some families do not begin dinner before half past seven1 or eight o'clock1 or even later1 but in these families1 it is not unusual for the breakfast hour to be very late also4 ,in consequence nothing is easier than to make a schedule for the day's work begin late and end late1 without making any other alteration in it4 ,the following schedule1 however1 combines an early breakfast and a late dinner1 in a family where only two employees were kept3 ,first ,employee ,from #g ,a4,m4 to #ab ,m4 #e hours ,from #e ,p4,m4 to #h ,p4,m4 #c hours ------- #h hours ,second ,employee ,from #ab ,m4 to #e ,p4,m4 #e hours ,from #g ,p4,m4 to #aj ,p4,m4 #c hours 7or from #h to #aa ,p4,m47 ------- #h hours ,,eight ,,hour ,,schedules ,,for ,,three ,,employees ,the greater the number of household employees1 the easier it is to make a satisfactory working schedule4 ,but the temptation to specialize the work is greater1 and should be carefully guarded against4 ,it is just as necessary with three employees as with one for the housewife to insist that each one be capable and willing to do all kinds of work in the home1 including sewing and taking care of children4 ,with three employees1 the housewife ought to make them take turns in cooking and serving one of the three meals each day4 ,this enables them to become familiar with the dining room and with the different dishes for each course2 it also removes any feeling of embarrassment which naturally might be felt by an employee who is rarely called upon to cook or serve a meal4 ,to have an expert needlewoman in the house is a great boon to the housewife1 and when she has three employees who can sew in her home1 she ought to insist upon a great deal of sewing and mending being done by each one of them4 ,it is rare that the servant of to-day is a good sewer2 in fact the housewife would hesitate to ask her to do even the ordinary mending1 but when one engages household employees on an eight hour schedule1 and when there are a hundred women to choose from1 it is not hard to find several who sew well4 ,,schedule ,,no4 ,,viii ,it is so easy to plan the housework for three employees that one schedule as an example seems quite sufficient1 and the only thing that the housewife must remember is to make all the work interchangeable4 ,first ,employee ,from #g ,a4,m4 to #aa ,a4,m4 #d hours ,from #ab ,m4 to #d ,p4,m4 #d hours ------- #h hours ,second ,employee ,from #aa ,a4,m4 to #c ,p4,m4 #d hours ,from #d ,p4,m4 to #h ,p4,m4 #d hours ------- #h hours ,third ,employee ,from #b ,p4,m4 to #e ,p4,m4 #c hours ,from #f ,p4,m4 to #aa ,p4,m4 #e hours ------- #h hours ,,conclusion ,in conclusion it seems that a few words are necessary about families who need the services of an employee at night as well as in the day time4 ,there are many mothers who do not wish or who are not able to take care of their children at night1 and in consequence it is absolutely necessary to have an attendant4 ,the present custom is to have the nurse or maid sleep in the same room as the baby1 or in a room adjoining the children's bedroom1 so as to be within call4 ,but a woman who has worked all day1 or even eight hours a day1 should not have her sleep disturbed at night by taking care of children4 ,no woman can be fit for her work the next day if she has not been able to secure the average amount of sleep necessary to health4 ,in many cases it has been proved that when a child does not sleep well at night1 the nurse has taken upon herself the responsibility of giving it soothing syrup so as to keep it quiet4 ,this is hardly to be wondered at when one considers the strain under which the nurse is kept day and night by taking care of a small child2 besides the average nurse is generally ignorant of the harm caused by so-called soothing syrups4 ,if a child be sick1 the mother should call in a trained nurse1 that is if she can afford it1 and when she has several employees1 she can usually afford this extra expense4 ,if the child or children be well1 and the mother desires some one to attend to them at night1 she should engage a woman who has no occupation during the day and who is willing to work at night4 ,she should make a point of choosing one who sews well1 so that the services of a seamstress might be combined with the duties of a night nurse4 ,there is always some mending to do in all families and a woman who is clever with her needle might make herself very useful to her employer4 ,thousands of women sew by artificial light in dressmaking establishments and factories2 in all probability just as many women could be found to sew by artificial light in private homes4 ,perhaps at first the novelty of working at night might deter women from taking a position similar to the one suggested above1 but a woman who was really in need of work would not let the unusual hours prevent her from accepting it1 ,many men work at night and it is not unlikely that many women would be willing to do it too4 ,women are not as timid as they were reputed to be in former years2 they would neither scream nor faint nowadays at the sight of a little mouse scampering across the floor4 ,indeed quite recently the newspapers reported that a woman whose husband had just died had accepted the position of a night watchman1 and she filled her new rle so successfully that on one occasion she managed to seize a burglar and handed him over to a policeman4 ,this proposition of engaging a woman to work at night is only a suggestion1 however1 offered to those who find it absolutely necessary to have a domestic employee in their house at night4 ,it remains to be proved if it could be carried out successfully4 ,but the great changes in housekeeping described in the preceding chapters are not mere suggestions nor theories of what might be done3 each reform has already been put into actual practice4 ,the result has been so extraordinary that one is impelled to believe that the only way to solve the ,servant ,problem is to apply business principles to housework in private homes4 ,naturally such a revolution from methods now in vogue can not be wrought in a day1 and the transitional period may be one of some difficulty and confusion for employer and employee alike who have spent a large portion of their lives under the old rgime4 ,but the revolution is imperative1 and the ultimate benefit beyond calculation4