,,act1 ,,declaration1 ,,and ,,testimony1 ,,for ,,the ,,whole ,,of ,,our ,,covenanted ,,reformation1 ,,as ,,attained ,,to1 ,,and ,,established ,,in ,,britain ,,and ,,ireland2 ,,particularly ,,betwixt ,,the ,,years #afch ,,and #afdi1 ,,inclusive4 ,,as1 ,,also1 ,,against ,,all ,,the ,,steps ,,of ,,defection ,,from ,,said ,,reformation1 ,,whether ,,in ,,former ,,or ,,later ,,times1 ,,since ,,the ,,overthrow ,,of ,,that ,,glorious ,,work1 ,,down ,,to ,,this ,,present ,,day3 ,,by ,,the ,,reformed ,,presbytery4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,psalm ,,ix1 #d4--,thou hast given a banner to them that fear thee3 that it may be displayed because of the truth4 ,,isaiah ,,viii1 #af4--;,bind up the testimony1 seal the law among my disciples4 ,,jude1 verse #c4--,that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered to the saints4 ,,revelation ,,iii1 #aa4--;,behold1 ,i come quickly3 hold that fast which thou hast1 that no man take thy crown4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,to ,,which ,,is ,,now ,,added1 ,a ,,historical ,,and ,,declaratory ,,supplement4 #ahej4 ,,introduction4 ,the ,presbytery1 soon after their erection1 being convinced of the expediency and necessity of emitting a judicial testimony1 to discover to the world the principles upon which1 as a judicatory of the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 they stood1 in opposition to the different1 so called1 judicatories in the land2 together with the agreeableness of these principles to the ,word of ,god1 the only rule of faith and practice1 and to the covenanted constitution of the church of ,scotland in her purest periods2 did therefore1 after a proposal for said effect1 agree in appointing one of their number to prepare a draft of this kind to be laid before them1 who1 after sundry delays1 to their grief of mind1 at once cut off their hopes of all assistance from him1 in that or any other particular1 by laying himself obnoxious to the censures of the church2 which the presbytery1 in duty both to him1 to ,god1 and to his people1 were obliged to put in execution against him1 while he1 in contempt of that ordinance1 and other means used for his conviction and recovery1 obstinately persists in his impenitency and defection4 ,and although the presbytery1 few in number1 were thus diminished1 yet1 being still resolved to prosecute their former design1 they renewed their appointment upon another brother1 who1 in consequence of his undertaking1 was allowed a cessation from his other public work1 in order to expedite the proposed draft3 and now1 when nothing was expected that should retard the finishing of such a necessary work1 the lamentable fire of division1 that had long been smothered1 unhappily broke forth into a violent flame1 whereby the presbytery was rent asunder1 and that brother1 on whom the appointment was formerly laid1 happening to be of the separating party1 a second stop was not only put to the publication of this testimony1 but the presbytery1 from the absence of a brother removed to a distant part of the world1 together with the paucity of their number1 were almost wholly discouraged from attempting again what they had been oftener than once disappointed in4 ,but notwithstanding of the above1 with many other difficulties which we shall not at present take notice of1 the presbytery1 still considering1 that1 even in their present circumstances1 when their number is few and despicable1 their adversaries many1 and such as are in repute in the world1 whereby the opposition made to them1 and the conspiracy formed against the covenanted testimony of the church of ,scotland maintained by them1 must needs be strong2 there is yet a gracious door of opportunity left open for them to attempt1 in their judicative capacity1 the prosecution and accomplishment of the necessary work formerly proposed2 and which they could not but judge the ,lord still called them unto1 while after all the above-mentioned breaches made upon them1 he still continued to give them a nail in his holy place1 and a wall in ,judah and ,jerusalem1 ,ezra ix1 #h1 #i1 they therefore again laid their appointments upon some others to prepare a draft of ,an ,act1 ,declaration1 and ,testimony1 c41 and which1 under the favor of ,divine ,providence1 has at length been finished and laid before the presbytery4 ,we only need to observe further with reference to this1 that the long delay of what is now agreed upon did not proceed from any design in the presbytery1 of depriving either the people of their particular inspection1 or the generation1 of any benefit that might be obtained by a work of this nature1 but partly from the fewness of their number1 and great extent of their charge1 and partly from the great distance of members' residence from each other1 whereby they can seldom have access to meet all together1 for expediting this or any other work of public concern they have in hand4 ,it is1 therefore1 with an eye to the ,wonderful ,counselor 7when ,zion's faithful counselors are so few7 for light and direction in the management of this great and important work1 that the presbytery have resolved upon the publication hereof at this time1 for the reasons which follow3 #a4 ,because this duty of bearing witness for truth1 and declaring against all error1 and defection from it1 and transmitting the same uncorrupted to posterity1 is expressly enjoined on the church by the ,spirit of ,god in the ,scriptures of truth4 ,psal4 lxxviii1 #e3 ,for he hath established a testimony in ,jacob1 and appointed a law in ,israel1 which he commanded our fathers that they should make them known to their children4 ,isaiah xliii1 #aj3 ,ye are my witnesses1 saith the ,lord4 ,matth4 x1 #cb3 ,whosoever1 therefore1 shall confess me before men1 him will ,i also confess before my ,father who is in heaven4 ,john xv4 #bg3 ,ye also shall bear witness4 ,acts i1 #h3 ,and ye shall be witnesses unto me4 #b4 ,because1 in agreeableness to the above scripture warrant1 it has been the constant practice of the church in all ages1 when in such capacity1 judicially to assert1 and declare their approbation of the truths of the everlasting gospel1 and attainments of the church1 joined with the condemnation of all contrary error1 as appears from their harmonious confessions3 and particularly1 this has been the honorable practice of the once famous church of ,scotland1 witness her excellent confessions1 covenants1 c41 whose posterity we are1 and1 therefore1 in duty bound to homologate1 and approve her scriptural form and order1 by a judicial asserting of her attainments1 as saith the apostle1 ,philip4 iii1 #af3 ,nevertheless whereunto we have already attained1 let us walk by the same rule1 let us mind the same thing4 ,rev4 iii1 #c3 ,remember1 therefore1 how thou has received1 and heard1 and hold fast1 and repent4 #c4 ,that1 notwithstanding many1 both ministers and private ,christians1 have been honored faithfully to publish their testimonies and declarations1 and to seal them with their blood1 in opposition to the growing defections in the land1 being through the tyranny of the times prevented from acting in any other capacity3 yet never1 since the national overthrow of the glorious structure of reformation1 has any church judicatory2 constituted purely on the footing of our covenanted establishment1 appeared in a judicial vindication of our ,redeemer's interest and injured rights4 #d4 ,the unspeakable loss sustained by the present generation1 through the want of a full and faithful declaration of the covenanted principles of the church of ,scotland1 which they in the loins of their ancestors were so solemnly engaged to maintain2 whereby1 as ignorance must be increased1 so prejudices are also gradually begotten in their winds against the truth in the purity thereof4 ,and this1 through the many mistaken notions at present prevailing among the different contending parties of professors in these nations1 concerning the distinct ordinances of divine institution1 viz41 the ministry and magistracy1 or ecclesiastical and civil government2 and1 more especially1 the presbytery reckon themselves1 and all professing their allegiance unto ,christ and his cause1 obliged to maintain the testimony of our ancestors for the divine institution and right constitution of civil government1 according to the law of ,god1 as what they found to be1 and still is1 indispensably necessary for the outward defense and preservation of righteousness and true religion2 and because the very foundation and ends of this ordinance have been doctrinally subverted1 and the generation taught the most licentious principles concerning it1 by a body of professed witnesses among ourselves3 and this they design to do1 without 7as they are slanderously reported of by some7 laying aside themselves1 or withdrawing others1 from the study of internal and habitual or practical holiness4 #e4 ,to wipe off the reproach of that odium cast upon the presbytery and community belonging thereto1 by some who invidiously call them a headless mob1 whose principles cannot be known1 anti-government men1 men of bloody principles1 c41 than which nothing can be more unjust3 seeing1 as a body distinct from all others1 they have still stood upon the footing of the covenanted establishment1 as has been frequently declared to the world1 and as the constitution of the presbytery bears2 so that they can no more be said ever to have wanted a proper testimony exhibiting their principles to the world1 than the reformed church of ,scotland1 whereof they are a part4 #f4 ,the present broken and divided situation of the members of ,,christ',s mystical body1 together with the abounding of error1 seems necessarily to require it as a proper mean1 under the divine blessing1 for gathering again the scattered flock of ,christ1 the chief shepherd1 to the one sheepfold1 and putting a stop to the current of prevailing apostasy and defection4 ,for these reasons 7with more that might be adduced7 the presbytery find themselves in duty bound1 to ,god1 the present and succeeding generations1 to throw in their small mite of a testimony1 against the manifold avowed backslidings and defections of all degrees of men1 both in the former and present times1 from the precious truths of ,christ1 and purity of his ordinances2 unto the maintenance whereof1 not only they1 but all in these lands1 are solemnly bound by covenant engagements4 ,and1 to conclude1 let none mistake the presbytery's aim and intention1 in the whole or any part of the following testimony1 as if they minded nothing else but magistracy1 c41 and that to have civil government1 and governors established1 according to the rule of ,god's word1 was all the religion they intended1 without regarding or opposing any other of the prevailing evils and iniquities of the present time4 ,so some are pleased to allege1 as has been hinted above2 but such might do well to consider1 that1 as the sovereign and distinguishing goodness of ,god is clearly evidenced in giving his statutes and judgments unto his ,israel1 in all ages1 while he has not dealt so with the other nations of the world1 wherein his will is manifestly revealed1 determining his people's duty in all their regulations2 so his glory is equally concerned1 that they receive1 observe1 keep pure and entire1 all the ordinances he hath appointed in his word4 ,the sinful prostitution of any of these1 or breaking over the boundaries which ,jehovah hath set is an evident contempt of his sovereign authority1 and violation of the moral law4 ,god requires of his people an universal respect to all his ordinances and commandments4 ,hence what is designed by them in this undertaking1 is equally to testify their adherence unto1 and approbation of the doctrine1 worship1 discipline and government of the house of ,god2 and to signify their opposition to1 and dissatisfaction with1 all the apostatizing1 backsliding courses in principle and practice1 from that reformation purity1 both in church and state 7which1 as the attainment of the nations of ,britain and ,ireland1 was by them accounted their chief ornament and glory71 that have taken place1 especially in this kingdom1 since our woful decline commenced3 whereby the witnesses for ,scotland's covenanted reformation1 have been deprived of any legal benefit1 as well1 since as before the late revolution2 in which the reformation1 neither in civil nor ecclesiastical constitutions1 was adopted4 ,the intent1 therefore1 of this work is of very great importance2 no less being proposed1 than the right stating of the testimony for the covenanted interest of ,christ in these lands1 and judicial vindication of all the heads thereof1 after such a long and universal apostasy therefrom3 a work that must needs be attended with great difficulties1 and labor under manifold disadvantages1 as in other respects1 so particularly from the consideration of the temper of this age1 wherein nothing almost is pleasing1 but what is adapted to the taste1 not of the best1 but of the greatest3 and naked truth without the varnish of flattery1 and painting of carnal policy1 is generally treated with contempt1 and exposed to ridicule4 ,and therefore1 to remove as much as possible the prejudice of a critical age1 who are ready to reject every thing as new1 which is in some respects singular1 and not suited to their favorite sentiments2 the presbytery have endeavored1 in this work1 to conform1 as much as possible1 to the faithful contendings of former honest contenders for the truths and testimony of ,,jesus1 and that1 both as to matter and manner3 and as the grounds of this testimony are not any needless scrupulosities1 or strange novelties1 but precious and weighty truths1 of the greatest value and importance1 and of nearest affinity unto the continued series and succession of the testimonies of the church of ,scotland1 in former and more ancient periods2 so it is the presbytery's ambition1 that nothing1 as to the subject matter of what is here contained1 be looked upon as theirs1 but may be regarded as an ancient plea1 wherein is nothing but what has been maintained and confirmed by authors of the greatest fame and reputation in the church2 has been asserted by the greatest confessors1 and sealed by the best blood of the honored and faithful martyrs of ,jesus3 so that it may appear1 the cause and truths here judicially stated and vindicated1 are not of yesterday's date1 but the same old paths and good way1 that we are commanded to ask for1 and walk in1 though paths that are not now much trodden1 a way that is not much paved by the multitude of professors walking therein4 ,,act1 ,,declaration1 ,,and ,,testimony4 ,,part ,i4 ,containing a brief historical narration of the several periods of the ,testimony of the ,church of ,scotland1 and of the faithful contendings of the witnesses for ,christ1 particularly from the commencement of the ,reformation in these lands1 down to the late ,revolution2 with the ,presbytery's approbation thereof4 ,,ploughlandhead1 ,,june #f1 #agfa4 ,the which day and place1 the ,reformed ,presbytery being met1 and taking into their most serious consideration1 the deplorable situation of the interest of ,christ and religion at present1 in these sinning lands wherein so few are asking for the old path1 saying1 ,where is the good way1 that we may walk therein8 but1 on the contrary1 an avowed apostasy and backsliding from the right ways of the ,lord1 is by the generality carried on1 with a secret undermining of reformation interests1 by some1 under more specious pretenses2 and1 further1 considering the general deluge of error and heresy1 that has overrun these lands1 and the swarm of erroneous heretics that has overspread the same1 making very impious attacks upon the most part of revealed religion1 who1 notwithstanding1 have found such shelter under the wings of a ,laodicean church1 and almost boundless state toleration1 that they walk on without fear in the foresaid broad way of sin and error4 ,and1 moreover1 all kinds of sin and wickedness so universally abound and pass1 without any suitable check1 that he who departs from iniquity maketh himself a prey2 together with the woful insensibility1 and deep security of all1 under our spiritual plagues and impending temporal strokes4 ,and yet1 while the land so evidently groans under its inhabitants1 very few either acknowledge themselves guilty1 or turn from the evil of their ways1 saying1 ,what have we done8 ,also1 considering the horrid breach and contempt of sacred vows unto the ,most ,high1 the great effusion of the saints' blood1 shed in our late persecution under prelacy 7which is yet to be found in our skirts71 and the faithful testimony they therewith sealed1 remains buried under the gravestones1 both of ecclesiastical and civil deeds of constitution1 unto this day4 ,so that we may rather admire1 that the ,lord hath not made such inquisition for blood1 as to make our land an aceldama1 than that we are yet under a dispensation of divine forbearance4 ,all which is followed with a deep oblivion of most or all of the memorable instances of the ,lord's goodness1 mercy and power1 manifested unto his church1 in these lands2 the remembrance whereof ought still to be retained1 and the same acknowledged with thankfulness1 by all the children of ,zion1 unto the latest ages4 ,wherefore the presbytery1 amidst their many difficulties1 partly noticed in the introduction1 as a court of the true ,presbyterian ,covenanted ,church of ,,christ in ,scotland1 constituted in the name of the ,,lord ,,jesus ,,christ1 the alone ,,king and ,,head of his church1 judicially to commemorate3 ,likeas1 they did1 and hereby do acknowledge1 with the utmost gratitude1 the great goodness and tender mercy of our ,god unto our church and land2 who1 in consequence of that early new covenant grant1 made by ,,jehovah to his eternal ,,son1 to give him the heathen for his inheritance and the uttermost parts of the earth for his possession1 caused the day spring from on high to visit us4 ,our glorious ,redeemer1 that bright and morning ,star1 having1 by his almighty power1 shaken oft the fetters of death1 wherewith it was impossible that he could be held1 and1 as a victorious conqueror1 leading captivity captive1 ascended into the highest heavens1 and there sat down on the right hand of ,god1 did very soon discover his cordial acceptance of1 and superlative delight in1 possessing his ,father's extensive grant1 by stretching forth the lines of his large and great dominion unto the distant nations of the world1 involved in the thickest darkness of stupidity and idolatry2 and1 in a particular manner1 did1 as the glorious sun of righteousness1 graciously illuminate this remote and barbarous isle1 causing the refulgent beams of gospel light to dissipate the gross darkness that1 covered the people1 which prevailed so far 7according to very authentic historical accounts71 that1 about the beginning of the third century1 those of the highest dignity in the nation1 voluntarily enlisted themselves under the displayed banner of ,,christ1 the captain of salvation1 and became nursing fathers and nursing mothers to his church1 employing their power to root out ,pagan idolatry1 and bring their subjects under the peaceful scepter of the ,,son of ,,god4 ,this plant of ,christianity having once taken root1 did1 under all the vicissitudes of divine providence1 grow up unto a spreading vine1 which filled the land1 and continued to flourish1 without being pressed down with the intolerable burden of prelatical or popish superstition3 the truths and institutions of the gospel being faithfully propagated and maintained in their native purity and simplicity by the ,culdees some hundreds of years before ever that man of sin and son of perdition1 by the door of prelacy1 stepped into the temple of ,god in ,scotland4 ,those early witnesses for ,,christ1 having no other ambition but that of advancing piety and the doctrines which were according to godliness1 were therefore called ,culdees1 that is1 ,cultores ,dei1 or worshipers of ,god4 ,the doctrine1 worship1 discipline1 and government of the house of ,,god being thus established1 continued for many years1 taught and exorcised1 according to divine institution4 ,but1 in process of time1 the ,church of ,,christ in this land came to be assaulted with the corruptions of the see of ,rome1 by means of ,palladius1 the ,pope's missionary to the ,britons1 who made the first attempt to bring our fathers' necks under the anti-christian yoke1 which gradually increasing by little and little1 clouded the sunshine of prosperity the church then enjoyed1 till about the eleventh century1 when the ,romish fraternity fully established themselves1 by usurping a diocesan supremacy over the house of ,god2 after which a midnight darkness of popish error and idolatry overwhelmed the nation1 for near the space of five hundred years4 ,yet1 even in this very dark period1 the ,,lord left not himself altogether without some to bear witness for him1 whose steadfastness in defense of the truth1 even unto death1 vanquished the inhuman cruelty of their savage enemies4 ,the honor of the church's exalted ,head being still engaged to maintain the right of conquest he had obtained over this remote isle1 and raise up his work out of the ruins1 under which it had lain so long buried2 he1 about the beginning of the #aeth century1 animated some valiant champions 7,messrs4 ,hamilton1 ,wishart1 and others7 with a spirit of truth and heroic courage1 to contend against the abominations of the ,babylonish whore1 whose labors1 by the blessing of ,heaven1 were rendered successful1 to open the eyes of some to see1 and engage many others to inquire after1 and espouse the truth as it is in ,,jesus4 ,these1 not regarding the fear of man1 nor the cruelty of their enemies1 but as good soldiers of ,,jesus ,,christ1 enduring hardness1 chose1 rather than desert their ,master's cause1 to offer their bodies to be devoured by the tormenting flames1 no more merciless than their hellish persecutors2 while in that fiery chariot1 through the serial regions1 their souls ascended to the celestial country4 ,and herein1 also1 did ,,god frustrate the expectation of that monster of iniquity1 ,cardinal ,beaton 7whose memory let it for ever perish71 and his wicked accomplices1 and turned their counsel into foolishness1 who1 by the death of a few zealous contenders for the faith1 intended the total suppression of ,,christ',s truth for ever2 but ,,god having purposed the contrary1 made the effusion of their blood the occasion of rousing many from the deep sleep of gross ignorance1 by putting them to search into the truth of those doctrines1 which these martyrs sealed with their blood2 so that ,,jesus ,,christ1 the only true light in the orb of the gospel1 began again to shine forth within this realm4 ,upon this begun revival of reformation1 the glory of the ,,lord went remarkably before his people1 and the ,,god of ,israel was their reward1 uniting the hearts1 and strengthening the hands1 both of noble and ignoble1 to a vigorous and active espousing of his gospel1 and concerns of his glory1 in opposition to the tyranny of the lordly bishops1 persecuting rage1 and masked treachery of the two bloody ,marys1 the mother and daughter1 who then successively governed1 or rather tyrannized1 in ,scotland4 ,their number1 as well as their zealous spirit1 still increasing1 they1 for the more effectual management of this noble enterprise1 entered into covenants to advance that begun work of reformation1 and to defend the same and one another in the maintenance thereof1 against all opposition whatsoever4 ,several such covenants our early reformers solemnly entered into at ,edinburgh1 ,perth and ,leith1 in the years #aeeg1 '#ei1 '#fj and '#fb4 ,in #aefj1 the ,confession of the ,faith1 and doctrine believed and professed by the ,protestants within1 the realm of ,scotland1 was compiled and civilly ratified1 or allowed of1 in free and open parliament1 afterward sworn to in the ,national ,covenant annis #aehj1 #aeha and #aeij4 ,at the same time1 some other acts were passed1 in favor of reformation2 one against the mass and abuse of the sacraments2 another1 abolishing the ,pope's jurisdiction and authority with this realm1 c4 ,in the above mentioned year #aefj1 the first book of policy and discipline1 containing the form and order of presbyterial church government1 was composed1 approven and subscribed by the ministry1 and a great part of the nobility4 ,thus1 by the wisdom and power of ,,god1 who takes the wise in their own craftiness1 by means1 especially1 of the indefatigable labors of the renowned ,mr4 ,,knox 7whose memory is still savory in the churches71 was this surprising work of reformation advanced1 until it obtained the authority of a law2 whereby1 was not only the presbyterian protestant interest ratified1 but anti-christian supremacy and superstition abolished4 ,the church1 gradually increasing in beauty and perfection1 did1 with much painfulness and faithful diligence1 labor after a more full establishment of the house of ,,god1 in all its privileges1 until1 by perfecting the second book of discipline1 they completed the exact model of presbytery1 which1 though they had enjoyed national assemblies for a considerable time1 yet was not brought to such an entire conformity to the divine pattern1 nor so generally acquiesced in until now1 that it was unanimously approven by the assembly #aeij1 and particularly enjoined to be subscribed by all who did bear office in the church2 and1 at last1 they prevailed to get it publicly voted and approven in parliament1 ,june1 #aeib2 and also at the same time1 obtained by act of parliament1 the ratification of all the privileges and liberties of the church1 in her assemblies1 synods1 presbyteries1 c4 ,and here we may observe1 that while this church and nation contended for the obtaining of a legal establishment of the ecclesiastical polity1 they were no less concerned to have that other distinct ordinance of ,,god1 civil magistracy1 unalterably settled1 in agreeableness to the rule of ,,god',s word4 ,this appears1 not only by their earnest contendings against the abuse of that ordinance among them2 but also1 by the public acts of parliament1 obliging prince and people to be of one perfect religion1 and wholly incapacitating all persons1 for bearing any office1 supreme or subordinate1 who refused1 by their solemn oath1 to approve of1 and1 to the utmost of their power1 engage to defend the true religion1 as contained in the word of ,,god1 and confession of faith founded thereon1 then believed1 and publicly professed within the realm1 ratified and generally sworn to in the ,national ,covenant1 during the whole course of their lives1 in all their civil administrations4 ,see ,acts ,parl4 #ast1 ,james ,,vi1 #aefg4 ,thus the hand of ,,god was remarkably seen1 and his powerful arm evidently revealed1 in delivering this nation both from ,pagan darkness and ,popish idolatry1 the memory whereof ought not to be lost1 but thankfully acknowledged1 to the honor of ,,god',s great name1 by all such as favor the dust of ,zion1 for her sake1 and long to see her breaches1 now wide as the sea1 repaired4 ,but to proceed3 ,the church's grand foe envying her growing prosperity1 did soon disturb her peace1 by insinuating himself upon those of superior dignity1 who were intrusted with the administration of civil affairs1 both supreme and subordinate1 blowing up into a flame that inbred and rooted enmity1 which they still retained1 at the simplicity1 strictness and scriptural purity of the reformation in ,scotland4 ,the then supreme civil ruler1 king ,james ,,vi1 formed a scheme for ruining the church of ,scotland1 and stripping her of those comely and beautiful ornaments of reformation purity1 in doctrine1 worship1 discipline and government1 which she had now put on1 by introducing episcopacy1 and establishing bishops4 ,this he did for no other reason 7says one71 but because he believed them to be useful and pliable instruments for turning a limited monarchy into absolute dominion1 and subjects into slaves2 that which of all other things he affected most3 and for this purpose 7after several subtle and cunningly devised steps1 previously taken1 with design to do by degrees what could not be done at once7 he makes an open attack upon the general assembly1 robbing them of their power and liberty to meet1 judge and determine1 in all ecclesiastical concerns 7well knowing1 that so long as assemblies might convene in freedom1 he would never get the estate of bishops established in ,scotland71 and imprisoning and banishing many faithful ministers1 members of the general assembly1 who opposed him1 testified and protested against his wicked invasion1 and sacrilegious robbery of the church's rights and privileges4 ,and1 having at last obtained the supremacy and headship over the church1 which was granted him by an impious act of a pretended parliament1 of his own stamp1 called by him for that purpose1 proceeded with his design1 until he had again established ,prelacy1 and razed ,presbytery almost to the very foundations1 notwithstanding all the opposition made to it by the faithful in the land1 both ministers and people4 ,thus1 after several former attempts to this effect1 was ,episcopacy again established1 and prelates lording over ,,god',s heritage advanced1 imposing their popish ceremonies1 which in that pretended assembly convened at ,perth1 anno #afah1 were enacted1 and afterward ratified in a subsequent parliament in the year #afba4 ,and as the father had thus violated his solemn professions1 declarations and engagements1 to maintain the covenanted interest2 so likewise1 upon the accession of the son to the throne1 there was no amendment nor redress had3 but he followed the same iniquitous course1 walking in the way of his father1 and in the sin wherewith he made ,israel to sin4 ,and further1 obtruded upon the church a service book1 a book of popish and prelatical canons1 which was followed with a violent prosecution of the faithful contenders for the former laudable constitutions of the church1 carried on by that monstrous ,erastian high-commission court1 patched up of statesmen and clergymen3 and hereby was the church again brought under the yoke of anti-christian prelacy1 and tyrannical supremacy2 which lese-majesty to ,zion's ,king was also ratified with the sanction of civil authority4 ,to this yoke1 oppressing ,,christ',s loyal subjects1 many of his professed servants submitted their necks1 and1 ,issachar-like1 became servants to tribute for a considerable time4 ,but when the ,,lord',s set time to favor ,zion came1 he made the long despised dust thereof again to be more pleasant and precious than ever unto his servants and people1 and the long night season and thick clouds of adversity under which his church labored1 amid some day-sky1 and sun-blinks of prosperity1 she at times enjoyed1 to issue in the dawning of a day of clearer light wherein the glorious ,,sun of ,righteousness shone in his meridian splendor1 with greater brightness both in this and the neighboring nations1 than at his first arising therein1 in a gospel dispensation2 whose benign influences caused the small grain of good seed1 sown by the skill of the ,great ,husbandman1 to grow up to a fruitful plant1 the tender twig to spread itself into a noble vine1 and the little cloud1 like a man's hand1 to cover the whole hemisphere of the visible church of ,scotland1 which long ago1 as a church and nation1 had enlisted themselves under the ,,lord ,,jesus ,,christ1 as their ,royal ,prince2 whose peaceful and righteous scepter being now also extended to ,england and ,ireland1 they soon submitted themselves thereto1 in a religious association and union with ,scotland in covenant engagements1 for reformation from prelacy1 as well as ,popery1 which they had never hitherto yielded to4 ,upon this gracious return of divine favor1 and discovery of ,almighty power manifested against the mighty agents for prelatical superstition1 both in church and state1 when1 from the paucity of those who appeared in favor of truth1 in the year #afcg1 small opposition unto its enemies could be expected2 yet their magnanimity in witness-bearing was so followed by manifestations of the divine countenance and favor1 that both their number and courage daily increased4 ,the ,national ,covenant was again1 after mature deliberation1 anent both the lawfulness1 expediency and seasonableness thereof1 with great solemnity renewed in ,march1 #afch1 with the general concurrence of the ministry1 noblemen1 gentlemen1 and others1 humbling themselves before the ,,lord for their former defections and breach of covenant2 though1 at the same time1 the court faction1 and many temporising ministers1 continued in their opposition1 but which was indeed too weak to make resistance unto the cause of ,,god1 and force of truth carried home with suitable conviction upon the conscience4 ,the covenant being first renewed at ,edinburgh1 they provided next1 that it should also be renewed through the kingdom2 and for this purpose1 copies thereof were sent with all convenient speed to the several presbyteries1 together with suitable exhortations1 and instructions for renewing of the same in every parish of their bounds2 and by this means it came to pass1 through the good hand of their ,,god upon them1 that in a little time almost every parish through ,scotland did1 with much solemnity1 cheerfulness and alacrity1 renew the same1 and publicly with uplifted hand avouch the ,,lord to be their ,,god4 ,and as this solemn action was everywhere accompanied with remarkable evidences of divine power and presence in a plentiful effusion of a spirit of grace and supplication2 so the joy of the ,,lord herein became their strength1 and greatly increased the faith and hopes of all the church's real friends1 that as the ,,lord had begun1 so he would also make an end1 and carry on his work to perfection1 amid the terrible threatenings both of king and court2 his majesty being highly displeased that his authority was contemned1 and no concurrence of his royal pleasure sought in the renovation of the ,covenant3 but their righteousness in this particular was brought forth as the light1 when the legality of this and their other proceedings was afterward attested to the king by the ablest lawyers in the kingdom4 ,the zealous contenders for the church's liberties1 by supplications1 reasonings1 and proposed articles1 for enjoying what they much longed for1 at last obtained1 before the foresaid year #afch expired1 a lawful and free ,general ,assembly 7constituted in the name of the ,,lord ,,jesus ,,christ1 the alone ,king and ,head of his church71 consisting of able members1 both ministers and elders1 who would not suffer an infringement upon their regular manner of procedure1 or right to act as unlimited members of a free court of ,,christ1 notwithstanding the constant attacks made upon their freedom by the king's commissioner1 and protestations by him taken against their regular procedure1 which issued in his ,erastian declaration of the king's prerogative1 as supreme judge in all causes1 ecclesiastical as well as civil1 and renewing all his former protestations in his royal master's name2 further protesting in his own name1 and in the name of the lords of the clergy1 that no act passed by them should imply his consent1 or be accounted lawful1 or of force to bind any of the subjects2 and1 then in his majesty's name dissolving the assembly1 discharging their proceeding any further1 and so went off4 ,but the assembly judging it better to obey ,,god than man2 and to incur the displeasure of an earthly king1 to be of far less consequence than to offend the ,prince of the kings of the earth1 entered a protestation against the lord commissioner's departure without any just cause1 and in behalf of the intrinsic power and liberty of the church2 also assigning the reasons why they could not dissolve the assembly until such time as they had gone through that work depending upon them4 ,this was given in to the clerk by ,lord ,rothes1 and part of it read before his grace left the house1 and instruments taken thereupon4 ,then1 after several moving and pathetic speeches delivered on that occasion1 for the encouragement of the brethren to abide by their duty1 by the moderator1 ,mr4 ,alexander ,henderson1 and others1 ministers and elders1 exhorting them to show themselves as zealous for ,,christ their ,,lord and ,master1 in his interests1 as he had shewed himself zealous for his master2 they unanimously agreed that they should continue and abide by their work until they had concluded all things needful1 and that on all hazards4 ,and so they proceeded to the examination of that complaint against the bishops1 who1 on account of their1 tyranny1 superstition1 and teaching of ,popish1 ,arminian1 and ,pelagian errors1 were all laid under the sentence of deposition2 and many of them1 for their personal profaneness1 wickedness and debauchery proven against them1 together with their contumacy1 were also excommunicated with the greater excommunication1 for the destruction of the flesh1 that the spirit might be saved in the day of the ,,lord ,,jesus4 ,they gave their approbation of the ,national ,covenant2 and ,prelacy1 with the five articles of ,perth1 were found and declared to be abjured by it1 together with the civil places and power of kirkmen1 their sitting on the bench as justices of the peace1 sitting in council1 and voting in parliament4 ,subscription of the ,confession of faith1 or covenant1 was also enjoined1 presbyterian church government justified and approven1 and an act made for holding yearly ,general ,assemblies2 with many other acts and constitutions tending to the advancement of that begun reformation1 and purging the church of ,,christ of those sinful innovations1 crept into it1 which may be seen more at large in the printed acts of that assembly4 ,the lawful and just freedom which the church now claimed and stood upon1 so highly incensed the court1 because their ,erastian encroachments were not yielded to1 that all warlike preparations were speedily made for having them again reduced1 by force of arms1 to their former slavery4 ,yet1 what evil seemed intended against the church by the king1 with his popish and prelatical accomplices1 was by her exalted ,king and ,head happily prevented1 and they obliged1 at least1 to feign subjection1 and yield to a pacification4 ,in which it was concluded1 that an assembly be holden at ,edinburgh1 ,august #fth1 #afci1 and the parliament the #bjth of the same month1 that same year1 for healing the wide breaches1 and redressing the grievances both of church and state2 that what was determined by the assembly1 might be ratified by the parliament4 ,in this assembly1 the covenant was ratified and subscribed by the commissioner1 and an injunction laid upon the body of the kingdom for subscribing the same1 with an explication1 wherein the five articles of ,perth1 government of bishops1 the civil places and power of kirkmen were expressly condemned4 ,hereby the hopes of the ,prelates again being in a great measure lost1 and they receiving fresh assistance from the king 7who seemed to have little conscience in making laws1 and found small difficulty in breaking them71 recruited themselves the year following1 and took the field1 but with no better success than formerly1 which obliged them to yield to another pacification1 wherein both religious and civil liberties were ratified2 and in #afda1 these were further confirmed by the oaths1 promises1 laws1 and subscriptions of both king and parliament1 whereat the king was personally present1 and gave the royal assent to all acts made for the security of the same2 while at the same time he was concurring in the bloody tragedy acted upon the ,protestants in the kingdom of ,ireland4 ,the gracious countenance and abundant evidence of divine approbation wherewith the ,,lord vouchsafed to bless his contending1 reforming and covenanting church in ,scotland1 in a plentiful effusion of his ,holy ,spirit on the judicatories and worshiping assemblies of his people1 proved a happy means to excite and provoke their neighbors in ,england and ,ireland1 to go and do likewise4 ,for in the year #afdc1 when the beginning of a bloody war between the king and parliament of ,england threatened the nation with a series of calamity and trouble2 the parliament having convocated an assembly of divines to sit at ,westminster for consulting about a reformation of religion in that kingdom1 sent commissioners1 consisting of members of both houses and assembly1 to treat with the assembly of the church of ,scotland1 and convention of estates about these things4 ,in the month of ,august1 they presented their proposals to the convention of estates and assembly1 desiring1 that because the popish prelatical faction is still pursuing their design of corrupting and altering the religion through the whole island1 the two nations might be strictly united for their mutual defense against them and their adherents1 and not to lay down arms until those1 their implacable enemies1 were disarmed1 c4 ,commissioners were deputed from the estates1 and assembly1 to convene with those from ,england1 in order to consider their proposals4 ,and1 at the first conferences1 it was agreed that the best and speediest means for accomplishing the union and assistance desired1 was for both nations to enter into a mutual league and covenant for reformation and defense of religion and liberty against its enemies4 ,which being drawn up1 and affectionately embraced1 was unanimously approved by the general assembly and sent up to ,england by the hands of the ministers and elders1 sent commissioners from the church of ,scotland to the synod at ,westminster1 where 7being proposed by the parliament to the consideration of the synod71 after the interpolation of an explanatory note in the second article1 it was approven1 and with public humiliation1 and all other religious and answerable solemnity1 taken and subscribed by them 7the synod71 and by both honorable houses of parliament and by their authority taken and subscribed by all ranks in ,england and ,ireland that same year1 ratified by act of the parliament of ,scotland1 anno #afdd1 and afterward renewed in ,scotland1 with an acknowledgment of sins1 and engagement to duties by all ranks in the year #afdh1 and by the parliament1 #afdi4 ,thus1 to the rejoicing of all true lovers of the prosperity and beauty of the church1 who longed for ,,christ the salvation of ,israel1 his coming forth out of ,zion1 these three churches and nations combined and embarked together in the same honorable and glorious cause of reformation1 and solemnly bound themselves by the oath of ,,god1 to maintain and defend the same against all its enemies and opposers whatever2 thereby publicly professing their subjection to ,christ1 and their preferring of pure and undefiled religion1 the advancement of the interest1 kingdom and glory of ,,jesus ,,christ1 to their nearest and dearest interests in this world4 ,and the ,lord was with us while we were with him1 and steadfast in his covenant2 but when we forsook him1 and broke his covenant1 he also forsook us1 and delivered his strength into captivity1 and his glory into the enemies' hand4 ,in the next place1 the assembly at ,westminster1 with the assistance of commissioners from the general assembly of the church of ,scotland1 proceeded to conclude on what was needful for furthering and completing this intended and covenanted uniformity in religion1 that the ,lord might be one1 and his name one in the three lands4 ,and for this purpose1 a confession of faith was composed1 and agreed upon by that venerable assembly1 together with catechisms larger and shorter1 propositions concerning church government1 ordination of ministers1 and directory for worship2 all which were received and approved by the ,general ,assembly1 and convention of estates in ,scotland4 ,the ,lord thus prospering his work in the hands of his servants employed in ecclesiastical affairs1 gave no less countenance unto the parliament of ,england1 with the assistance they received from ,scotland1 in defeating all the wicked attempts of the popish1 prelatical and malignant party in ,england1 overthrowing their tyranny1 and reducing the supporters thereof4 ,a like victory was at length obtained over ,montrose in ,scotland1 who commanded the royalist1 or malignant party there1 and had for some time carried all before him4 ,and so the ,king being worsted at all hands1 and despairing of overtaking his designs1 his army having been almost all cut to pieces1 and himself obliged to fly1 resigned himself over to the ,scots army at ,newark1 in the year #afdf1 and marched along with them to ,newcastle2 and they1 upon the frequent solicitations of the ,english parliament1 and their engaging for the ,king's honorable treatment1 delivered him over to them4 ,afterward1 he falling into the hands of ,cromwell and the ,english army1 a number in this nation violated the oath of ,,god1 which they had lately come under1 by engaging in an unlawful war with ,england1 commonly called the ,duke's engagement1 in order to rescue the ,king from his captivity 7notwithstanding that he still persisted in his opposition to the just claims1 both of the church and nation1 and after all that was come upon him1 could not be reconciled to the covenants and work of reformation72 where they were in ,july #afdh1 totally routed by ,oliver ,cromwell2 and ,duke ,hamilton1 their general1 being made prisoner1 was incarcerated1 and afterward beheaded4 ,this engagement was remonstrated against1 and judicially condemned by the ,general ,assembly of the church of ,scotland2 and the sinfulness of it was publicly acknowledged as a breach of the covenant-union between the two nations1 by all ranks in ,scotland that same year1 at the renovation of the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant therein4 ,at last the king being seized upon by ,cromwell and his sectarian army1 was1 notwithstanding all the remonstrances both of church and state1 removed by a violent death4 ,upon which the parliament of ,scotland1 on the #eth of ,february1 #afdi1 caused proclaim his son ,charles ,,ii1 king of ,great ,britain1 ,france1 and ,ireland 7which title he had assumed himself at the ,hague1 as soon as the report of his father's death came to his ears71 promising their fidelity and defence of his person and authority1 according to the ,national ,covenant1 and the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant4 ,and at the same time declaring1 that before he be admitted to the exercise of the royal power1 he shall give security for the preservation and maintenance of the true reformed religion1 and unity of the kingdoms1 now established1 by laws both civil and ecclesiastical1 according to the covenants3 which security for religion and liberty1 at the first proposed treaty at the ,hague1 he deferred to grant1 and afterward postponed the signing of the treaty at ,breda1 when everything was agreed upon1 from the great hopes he entertained of accomplishing his design1 without acquiescing with their demand from ,montrose's expedition1 whom he had sent into ,scotland with an army1 in order to prepare his way into that kingdom1 by devastation with fire and sword4 ,but this intrigue not succeeding1 he found himself obliged to comply with all their proposals1 and signed the treaty4 ,this treaty the king did in effect break1 before he left ,breda1 by communicating after the episcopal manner1 contrary to the express warning and remonstrance of the commissioners from the church of ,scotland1 who went to him1 and showed him his sin in so doing1 and how inconsistent it was with his own concessions in the present treaty2 and an evidence that he had no intention to perform what he had agreed to1 but dissembled with ,,god and man2 and he1 on the other hand1 put them off with sham excuses and professions2 and so1 from their too much credulity to his fraudulent professions and promises all along1 they brought him over to ,scotland1 and before his landing in this kingdom1 he takes the covenant at ,spey1 on the #bcrd of ,june1 #afdi1 by his oath subjoined in allowance and approbation of the ,covenants ,national1 and ,solemn ,league1 obliging himself faithfully to prosecute the ends thereof in his station and calling2 and for himself and successors1 he shall agree to all acts of parliament enjoining the same1 and establishing presbyterial church government the directory for worship1 confession of faith and catechisms1 in the kingdom of ,scotland1 as approven by the ,general ,assemblies of this kirk1 and parliament of this kingdom4 ,and for their further satisfaction1 according to the act of the ,west ,kirk1 ,edinburgh1 ,august #acth1 #afej1 approven the same day by the committee of estates1 he emitted a declaration at ,dunfermline1 by profession1 fully and heartily acquiescing with all their demands1 all which afterward served for nothing but as a lasting monument of his horrid perjury1 wicked dissimulation1 and mockery of ,god and man4 ,and even then1 when this declaration was published1 he had formed a design for bringing in the enemies of the covenant1 and work of reformation1 both into the army and judicatories1 and for dividing the ,presbyterians among themselves4 ,and this he effectually managed for both foresaid ends1 by the public resolutions1 on the #adth of ,december1 that same year #afej4 ,this woful and prime step of defection1 so contrary to the word1 and injurious to the work of ,god1 was faithfully testified against by many1 both ministers1 and whole presbyteries1 who were sensible of the present sinfulness and evil of it1 and foresaw the bitter and dismal consequences that followed upon it4 ,in the meantime1 notwithstanding this1 and other shrewd evidences1 the king gave of his double dealing and hypocrisy1 he was crowned at ,scoon1 on the first of ,january1 #afea1 and had the ,covenants ,national and ,solemn ,league again administered unto him1 by the reverend ,mr4 ,douglas1 after a sermon from #b ,kings xi1 #ab1 #ag1 which he1 in a most solemn manner renewed1 before the three estates of parliament1 the commissioners of the ,general ,assembly1 and a numerous congregation1 in the words of his former oath at ,spey2 with the coronation oath1 as contained in the #hth ,act1 ,parl4 #ast1 ,james ,,vi1 to all which he engaged before his coronation2 and on these terms1 and no other1 were the oaths of fidelity to him1 as the lawful supreme magistrate1 taken1 at his receipt of the royal authority4 ,and consequently1 these covenant engagements became fundamental constitutions1 both in church and state1 and the door of access into office-bearing in either1 and formal ground of the people's subjection4 ,then was the church's appearance ,beautiful as ,tirzah1 comely as ,jerusalem1 and terrible as an army with banners4 ,from what is noticed above1 the presbytery cannot but declare their hearty approbation of the zeal1 courage1 and faithfulness of our honored ancestors1 in their valiant contendings for the valuable liberties and privileges of the spiritual kingdom of the ,,messiah1 until they got the same established1 and the nations brought under the most solemn1 sacred1 and inviolable engagements1 to maintain every branch of this glorious reformation2 a reformation1 not only from the more gross errors1 and idolatries of ,popery1 but from the more refined superstition of ,prelacy1 and all that ,antichristian and ,erastian supremacy1 that in former times had been exercised on the heritage of the ,,lord2 a reformation of both the divine ordinances of ministry and magistracy1 from all the abuses and corruptions thereof1 by the inventions of men1 joined with the above mentioned establishment of them1 in some measure of agreeableness unto their scriptural institution4 ,likeas1 the presbytery did1 and hereby do declare their approbation of1 and adherence unto foresaid reformation1 in all the different parts and branches thereof1 attained from #afch to #afej inclusive1 and sworn to in the ,national and ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 not exclusive of such parts of reformation as were attained unto prior to this1 but as a further advance on this foundation1 and as being much more pure and agreeable to the infallible standard of scripture1 than any formerly arrived at in these nations4 ,the daughter of ,zion1 thus going forth in the perfection of her beauty1 when all ranks and degrees voluntarily subjected themselves unto the royal scepter of the ,,son of ,,god1 was most comely in the eyes of her ,beloved2 ,but oh6 how is the gold become dim1 and the most fine gold changed2 the stones of the sanctuary are poured out on the top of every street1 so that the house that was called of all people the house of prayer1 is now become a den of thieves1 being no less infamously despicable for deformation1 than formerly1 for purity of reformation1 highly admired4 ,this1 at first1 began with the public resolutions of the commission of the ,general ,assembly #afej1 above noticed1 for taking into places of power and trust1 in judicatories and armies1 such persons as were known malignants1 and in heart disaffected to the work1 and people of ,,god1 putting it in their power to destroy and pull down the ,,lord',s work at their pleasure2 a practice manifestly inconsistent with their covenant engagements1 and the word of ,,god1 ,deut4 xxiii1 #i1 #b ,chron4 xix1 #b4 ,those that were then called protestors 7from their opposing and protesting against these resolutions71 continued steadfastly to witness against the same1 as the first remarkable step1 to make way for that bloody catastrophe1 that afterward befell the church4 ,the ,lord1 then1 in his righteous displeasure and controversy with the nation1 for betraying of his cause and interest into the hands of his enemies1 sold them into the hand of that conquering usurper1 ,oliver ,cromwell1 who1 having stript them of their civil liberties1 as the most effectual method to rob the church of her spiritual privileges1 and nullify the forcible obligation of the sacred covenants 7which1 when preserved1 serve as a strong barrier against all such usurpations71 framed a hellish and almost unbounded toleration in ,scotland1 of heretical and sectarian errors1 for gratification of the abettors thereof1 which was followed with a deluge of irreligion and impiety1 drowning the nation in a still deeper apostasy4 ,in this hour of temptation1 the witnesses for ,,christ1 endeavoring to keep the word of his patience1 testified against these evils1 as contrary to the word and oath of ,god1 and destructive of the church's former glory4 ,and ,charles ,,ii1 who had lately1 by all the confirmations of word1 writ1 and solemn oath1 obliged himself for the maintenance and defense of religion and liberty1 having cast off the thing that was good1 the enemy did pursue him so1 that he1 instead of being able to stand as a head of defense to the nations1 narrowly escaped with life from the enemies' hands1 being obliged to abscond and fly before the sectaries into ,france2 where1 and in other parts1 he remained an exile for the space of ten years1 and there discovered1 he had no regard to the principles he had lately professed and sworn to maintain3 but breaking his professed wedlock with ,,christ1 is said1 at that juncture1 to have joined hands with the ,romish whore1 laying aside his cloak of professed godliness1 and again taking up with the mystery of iniquity4 ,during the ten years' usurpation of ,cromwell1 those who endeavored faithfulness1 had a fight of affliction to keep their ground2 yet1 after this came to a period1 they had a far more fierce encounter1 and of longer duration1 to engage in1 in the cruel and bloody tragedy acted upon them1 for the space of #bh years4 ,as1 by the public resolutions1 and foresaid unbounded toleration1 the bounds fixed by ,,jehovah1 and homologated and sworn to1 in our national attainments and constitution1 were greatly altered1 so the parliament of ,england prepared the tools1 whereby the carved work of the sanctuary 7as far as human craft and cruelty could invent71 was broken down1 in restoring ,charles ,,ii1 without any conditions required1 or express limitations set4 ,and ,sharp being sent from the church of ,scotland1 to stand up for her rights and privileges1 fraudulently sold her into the hands of her enemies2 upon which1 many of the professed disciples of ,,christ1 who followed him in the sunshine of prosperity and reformation1 forsook him1 and fled into the enemies' camp4 ,thus our decline began2 but1 oh6 to what a dreadful height ,erastianism1 tyranny1 and bloodshed arrived1 before the ,lord1 in his providence1 put a stop to it4 ,although the ,presbytery cannot be supposed1 in a consistency with their present design1 to reckon up all1 yet they would endeavor to take notice of some of the most remarkable instances of backsliding1 treachery and oppression1 bloodshed1 c1 acted in those nations during the late persecuting period1 together with the faithful contendings1 and patient sufferings unto death of the saints and servants of ,,christ1 in this hot furnace of affliction into which they were cast4 ,as1 #a1 ,the unhappy restoration of ,charles ,,ii1 in manner before mentioned commencing4 ,the faithful declarations and testimonies given in favor of the covenanted reformation and uniformity1 were all on a sudden given up with2 the viper received into our bosom1 and again advanced unto the regal dignity1 who soon discovered himself to be of the serpentine seed1 and by his wicked agency imped the dragon his master1 by casting out of his mouth a flood of persecution after the church1 that he might cause her to be destroyed therewith4 ,to this effect the anti-christian yoke of abjured ,prelacy1 with all its tyrannical laws1 and canonical train of observances1 service book1 ceremonies1 c41 was speedily wreathed about ,england's neck1 and ,scotland soon felt part of its weight4 ,for1 in the month of ,august1 #affj1 when some of her most zealous and faithful ministers met upon this emergency1 in order to send an address to the king1 reminding him of his duty1 and solemn obligations to perform the same2 the committee appointed by the parliament1 anno #afea1 for exercise of government1 until another parliament should meet1 who then showed themselves zealous for the reformation1 yet now acted a counter-part1 by incarcerating the foresaid ministers1 and emitting a proclamation1 prohibiting all such meetings without the king's authority1 and all petitions and remonstrances1 under pretense that they were seditious4 ,this was the first beginning of those sorrows and calamities that ensued in the many sanguinary laws afterward made and executed upon the true friends of ,zion4 #b4 ,when the ministry1 by means of the foresaid prohibitions1 were much dispirited from their duty1 dreading such usage as they had lately met with1 the parliament which met in ,scotland in ,december1 #affa1 falls upon breaking down the carved work of the sanctuary effectually1 and robbing our church of that depositum committed unto her by her glorious ,head4 ,thus did they wickedly combine and gather themselves together to plot against the ,lord1 and against his ,anointed1 that they might break his bands1 and cast his cords from them4 ,for which intent1 after besmearing the consciences of most of the members with the guilt of that abominable and wicked oath of allegiance and supremacy1 that they might be secured to the court and king's interest1 and ready to swallow down whatever might be afterward proposed1 they passed an act rescissory1 declaring all the parliaments1 and acts of parliament made in favor of reformation1 from the year #afdj to #afea1 null and void4 ,the king's supremacy over all persons1 and in all causes1 is asserted4 ,all meetings1 assemblies1 leagues1 and covenants1 without the king's authority1 are declared unlawful and unwarrantable4 ,the renewing of the solemn league and covenant1 or any other covenants or public oaths1 without the king's special warrant and approbation1 is discharged4 ,besides these1 another heinous act was framed by the same parliament1 for observing every #bith of ,may as an anniversary thanksgiving1 in commemoration of the unhappy restoration of this ruiner of religion and reformation4 #c4 ,in the second session of the pretended parliament1 anno #affb diocesan ,erastian ,prelacy is established1 and the king solemnly invested with the church's headship1 by act of parliament2 wherein it is blasphemously declared1 ,that the ordering and disposal of the external government and policy of the church1 doth properly belong unto his majesty as an inherent right of the crown1 by virtue of his royal prerogative and supremacy in all causes ecclesiastical4 ,all such acts of parliament or council are rescinded1 which might be interpreted 7as their acts bear7 to give any church power1 jurisdiction1 or government1 to the office-bearers of the church1 other than that which acknowledges a dependence upon1 and subordination to1 the sovereign power of the king as supreme4 ,and although the lordly prelates were hereby promoted to all the privileges and dignities they possessed before the year #afch1 yet must they be all accountable to the king1 in all their administrations1 and in subordination to him1 as universal bishop of all ,england1 ,scotland1 and ,ireland4 ,by which the fountain of church power and authority is lodged in the king's person1 and ,,christ is exauctorated and dethroned as ,king and ,head in ,zion4 ,and further1 by the second act of that perfidious parliament1 the covenanted reformation1 and all that was done in favor thereof1 from #afch to #afej1 was declared treasonable1 and rebellious4 ,alike treasonable it was reckoned for subjects1 on pretense of reformation1 or any other pretense whatsoever1 to enter into any federal association1 or take up arms against the king4 ,they also declared1 that the ,national ,covenant1 as sworn in the year #afch1 and the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 were1 and are in themselves unlawful oaths1 and that they were imposed upon1 and taken by the subjects of this kingdom1 contrary to the fundamental laws and liberties thereof4 ,and to complete all1 they repealed all acts1 ecclesiastical and civil1 approving the covenants1 particularly the acts of the venerable assembly at ,glasgow #afch1 declaring it an unlawful and seditious meeting4 ,and thereafter1 by a wicked act of the council of ,glasgow1 more than three hundred ministers were illegally thrust from their charges1 for their non-conformity1 in discountenancing a diocesan meeting1 or synod1 appointed by the archbishop of ,glasgow1 and not observing the anniversary thanksgiving1 ,may #bith1 enjoined by the parliament4 ,the rest were violently ejected from the lawful exercise of their ministry in their several parishes1 and were afterward commanded by act of parliament to remove themselves and their families twenty miles distant from their respective flocks1 and not to reside within six miles of any of their 7so called7 ,cathedrals1 or three miles of a ,burgh4 ,by these means1 many of those poor persecuted ministers1 with their families1 were brought into great hardships and wants1 being so far removed from their beloved and affectionate flocks1 that they were deprived of that help from them1 that doubtless they would cheerfully have ministered1 for relieving them in their necessities and straits4 ,all this was done at the instigation of the prelates1 who could not endure to have a godly presbyterian minister near them1 and were resolved to make them as miserable as possible4 ,as the observation of that anniversary holy day1 ,may #bith1 was again enjoined by this parliament #affb1 with certification1 the non-observance of which was one main cause of the sufferings of the ministers above noticed1 we cannot pass over without mentioning that most abhorred and heaven-daring ignominy and contempt put upon our solemn and sacred covenants1 and upon ,,god the great ,party in them1 at ,linlithgow on that day1 by a theatrical exposing1 and presumptuous committing them to the flames1 together with ,the causes of ,,god',s wrath1 ,lex ,rex1 acts of parliament1 acts of committees of estates1 and acts of assemblies made1 during what they called the twenty-two years' rebellion1 that is1 from #afch to #affj1 done by the authority of the pretended magistrates there2 one of which1 and the minister ,ramsay1 were formerly zealous and active covenanters1 and consequently now publicly avowed and proclaimed their perjury in the face of the sun1 and left an indelible stain upon their memory4 ,hitherto1 although many1 both ministers1 gentlemen and others1 had endured unexpressible hardships and severities1 yet few or none suffered to the death1 save that noble peer1 the ,marquis of ,argyle1 who was condemned by the parliament #affa1 and beheaded ,may #bgth2 and the ,reverend ,mr4 ,james ,guthrie1 who suffered five days thereafter4 ,these two were singled out--the one in the state1 the other in the church--to fall a victim to the resentment and fury of the enemies of that covenanted work of reformation1 which they had both1 in an eminent manner1 been honored of ,,god to support and advance2 and also as a specimen of what was afterward to be the fate of all that should adhere to the same glorious cause1 and stand up for ,god against these workers of iniquity4 ,and1 as the foundation of that anti-christian and wicked hierarchy in the church1 and of arbitrary power and absolute tyranny in the state1 was laid in the blood of these two proto-martyrs for the covenant and cause of ,,god1 so they now 7,july1 #affc17 proceeded to build it up with the blood of another noble and worthy patriot1 the eminently religious and learned ,lord ,warriston4 ,he having before1 in #affj1 when ,argyle was apprehended1 been ordered1 together with several others1 to be secured and committed to prison1 fled beyond sea1 to escape the fury of his enemies1 and even there did their crafty malice reach him2 for1 having sent out one of their blood-thirsty emissaries in quest of him1 he was apprehended by him at ,roan1 in ,france1 brought over to ,london1 and sent thence to ,edinburgh1 where he was executed on a former unjust sentence of forfeiture and death1 passed upon him in his absence4 ,thus they built up ,zion with blood1 and ,jerusalem with iniquity4 ,but all this was nothing to the cruelty that followed1 and the righteous blood afterward shed in that quarrel4 #d4 ,although the faithful servants of ,,christ gave too silent submission for a time to these encroachments made upon their sacred functions1 yet1 as they received not their mission from men1 so they resolved not to become the servants of men1 but to hazard the loss of every thing that was dear to them in this world1 that they might show themselves faithful unto their ,lord and ,master1 and valiant for his truth upon the earth1 in going forth without the camp1 bearing his reproach4 ,when they could no longer1 with a safe conscience1 enjoy their benefices and churches1 and the ,lord so expressly called for their service1 in feeding the starving souls of his people1 they betook themselves to the open fields1 setting their faces to all the storms to which they were exposed by that high commission court that was erected2 wherein the bishops were chief agents1 being made therein necessary members for putting the former1 with what subsequent wicked laws were made against the servants of ,,christ1 in execution4 ,and1 by this time1 that deceiving1 cruel1 perjured1 apostate bishop1 ,sharp1 had obtained the presidency in this and all other public courts in the kingdom4 ,the proceedings of this court were very unjust1 cruel and arbitrary1 similar to its preposterous and illegal constitution4 ,persons were1 without any accusation1 information1 witness or accuser1 arraigned before them1 to answer super inquirendis to whatever interrogatories they were pleased to propose1 without license to make any lawful defense1 or1 upon their offering so to do1 were required to take the oath of supremacy1 their refusal of which was accounted cause sufficient for proceeding against them4 ,and although taking order with papists was first in their commission1 yet last1 or rather not at all1 in execution2 while their infernal rage was principally set on ,presbyterians1 in fining1 confining and imprisoning them1 for the non-conformity of ministers1 and their disregarding their pretended sentences of deposition1 and the people's refusing to countenance the authority and ministry of these prelatic wolves1 who came in to scatter and tear the flock of ,,christ1 but endeavoring to cleave to their lawful pastors1 have equal friends and foes with them1 and hear ,,christ',s law of kindness from their mouth4 ,the idol of jealousy was thus set up in the house of ,,god1 and our ,,lord ,,jesus ,,christ sacreligiously robbed of his incommunicable supremacy and headship over his church by the state2 whereby the ,pope's supremacy was well nigh claimed1 and ,spanish inquisition cruelty almost acted1 by this abominable court2 and all at the instigation and for the gratification of these monsters of iniquity1 the prelates1 who still agitated the court to exercise more cruelty than even of themselves they were inclined to4 #e4 ,upon the decline of this rigorous court1 new measures were again fallen upon for the oppression1 suppression and extirpation1 of the true reformed religion1 and the professors of it4 ,the council being very diligent and careful to deprive the ,,lord',s people of every thing which might contribute to their establishment and confirmation in the righteousness and equity of the cause and covenant of ,god for which they suffered1 and which tended to expose their tyranny and treason against ,,god1 ordered the famous ,mr4 ,brown's ,apologetical ,relation to be burnt in the high street of ,edinburgh1 on ,february #adth1 #afff1 by the hand of the common hangman2 and all persons who had copies of said book were required to give them up1 and such as concealed them to be fined #bjjj 4 ,scots1 if discovered4 ,such was their hellish enmity and spite against our covenanted reformation1 and every thing written in defense thereof1 and in vindication of those that suffered for their adherence to it4 ,about the same time1 ,sharp1 for the more effectual accomplishment of his wicked designs 7the high commission being now dissolved1 and his guilty conscience1 it seems1 suggesting fears of an insurrection of the oppressed1 to relieve themselves from their cruel oppressors71 obtains an order from the king for raising an additional number of forces1 for the security and establishment of himself and his associates in their thrones of iniquity1 by destroying all the faithful in the land1 oppressing and wearing out the saints of the ,most ,high1 and burning up and dispersing all the synagogues of ,,god in the nation4 ,in consequence of this1 about three thousand foot1 and eight troops of dragoons were got together1 and the command of them given to ,dalziel of ,binns1 a wicked1 fierce1 cruel man4 ,these were the instruments of that unprecedented barbarity1 cruelty and oppression1 committed in the ,west1 after the defeat of ,colonel ,wallace and his little army of covenanters1 at ,pentland ,hills1 ,november #bhth1 #afff4 ,the occasion and cause of which rising was1 in short1 this3 ,sir ,james ,turner had been sent the year before into the south-west shires of ,dumfries and ,kirkcudbright1 in order to suppress conventicles 7so they called the assemblies of ,god's people for public worship and other religious exercises71 levy the fines appointed by the parliament1 and oblige the people to conform and submit to the bishops and curates by force of arms4 ,turner1 in pursuance of these cruel orders1 committed great severities1 dreadfully oppressed1 robbed and spoiled the country4 ,in the parish of ,dalry1 in ,galloway1 three or four of his blackguard crew1 seizing upon a poor countryman1 carried him to his own house1 and were going to torture him in a cruel manner1 by setting him naked on a red-hot gridiron2 which four of the persecuted party hearing of1 they repaired to the house1 disarmed the soldiers 7upon their refusing to be entreated in behalf of the poor man71 and delivered their fellow sufferer4 ,and lest the rest of the soldiers quartered in the parish 7to force people to keep their parish church71 should fall upon them1 being joined with seven or eight more of their friends1 they attacked them early next morning1 being about twelve in number1 and disarmed them1 killing one that made resistance4 ,whereupon1 the country being alarmed1 and being apprehensive1 from sad experience1 of the revenge ,sir ,james would take upon the whole country for this affront1 without distinction of age or sex1 they determined to stand in their own defense4 ,and1 getting together a good number of horse and foot1 they march to ,dumfries1 surprise ,turner himself1 take him prisoner1 and disarm his soldiers1 without any further violence4 ,being thus by ,providence engaged1 without any hope of retreat1 and being joined by many more of their brethren in the same condition with themselves1 some ministers1 and ,colonel ,wallace 7afterward chosen general71 they come to ,lanerk1 where they renew the covenant1 ,november #bfth1 #afff1 and thence to ,pentland ,hills1 where1 being attacked by ,dalziel and his blood-hounds1 they were1 notwithstanding their bravery in repulsing the enemy twice1 at last totally routed1 many killed and taken prisoners1 most of the prisoners treacherously executed 7notwithstanding they were taken upon solemn promise to have their lives spared71 of whom the ,lord was graciously pleased1 not only to accept of a testimony1 by sufferings1 but also countenanced them1 even to admiration1 in sealing the same with their blood4 ,after this1 there were severe edicts issued out against all who had any hand in this appearance for ,,god',s cause and covenant 7called by them rebellion1 a horrible conspiracy1 and what not72 all the subjects were strictly charged not to harbor1 reset1 supply1 or in any manner of way correspond with any that were concerned in this engagement1 but that they pursue and deliver them up to justice1 or otherwise be esteemed and punished as favorers of it4 ,this appearance for religion and liberty became1 for a time1 the principal crime of which those were indicted who were prosecuted by this wicked council1 and other merciless enemies1 to whom they committed the management of their affairs4 #f4 ,although the cruelty of the court had hitherto been very great1 yet they had not wholly effectuated their wicked design of exterminating and destroying true religion1 and the professors thereof1 both ministers and people2 but1 like ,israel under ,pharaoh's yoke1 the more they oppressed them1 and suppressed their meetings1 the more numerous and frequent they grew1 so that their enemies were obliged to alter their course a little from cruelty into craft4 ,this appeared in the first indulgence1 granted anno #affi1 with design to divide ,presbyterians among themselves1 that they might the more easily destroy them4 ,hereby a pretended liberty was given to several ministers ejected by the act of ,glasgow1 #affb 7especially public resolutioners1 who had formerly served the court interest in that matter71 under certain restrictions1 destructive of their ministerial freedom and faithfulness1 to preach and exercise the other functions of the ministry in vacant churches4 ,in this fraudulent snare many were taken2 and even such of them as did accept of the indulgence1 but did not keep by the instructions given them by the council1 and observe the wicked anniversary1 c1 were afterward prosecuted1 fined1 and some turned out4 ,and those who refused compliance therewith1 and testified against it1 as flowing from that blasphemous supremacy and absolute power1 which the king had assumed1 were most severely handled1 and their assemblies for public worship interdicted under the highest pains4 ,a second indulgence was framed in the year #afgb1 in which net they expected to inclose such as the first had not caught4 ,by this1 liberty was granted to a number of non-conformed ministers1 named by the council1 not yet indulged1 to exercise their ministry in such places as the council thought fit to ordain and appoint them1 conforming themselves to the rules given by the council to those that were formerly indulged1 besides other restrictions1 wherewith this new liberty was clogged4 ,and1 as one special design of the court1 in granting both the first and this second indulgence1 was to put an effectual stop to the meetings of the ,,lord',s people1 ludicrously called by them field conventicles1 so they took occasion1 on account of their contempt of this their indulgence and liberty1 to prosecute all such as kept1 or attended on1 these meetings1 in a more merciless and furious manner4 ,this indulgence was accepted by many ministers2 and part thereof1 by others1 represented as a grievance1 and redress required4 ,but although nothing of this kind was obtained1 yet it was fallen in with and accepted by most of those who subscribed the remonstrance against it2 and those few who rejected it1 and continued faithfully to discharge their official trust in the open fields1 without coming under any of these sinful restrictions1 became1 more especially1 the butt of their enemies' malice and tyranny1 were more vigorously prosecuted1 and such as were suspected or convicted of attending on their field meetings1 were fined in an exorbitant manner1 and ministers imprisoned1 when they could be apprehended4 ,and because these field meetings1 the great eye-sore of the prelates1 still increased1 they prevailed with the council #afgd1 to take more special notice of the preachers at said meetings1 who appointed a committee for that effect1 and ordered their chancelor to send out parties to apprehend certain of them1 according to their direction4 ,and the same year1 a bond was imposed1 binding and obliging tenants1 that if they1 their wives1 or any of their children1 cottars or servants1 should keep or be present at any conventicles1 either in houses or fields1 that every tenant laboring land be fined for each house conventicle in #be4 ,scots2 each cottar in #ab4 ,scots2 each servant man in a fourth part of his year's fee1 and husbands the half of these fines for such of their wives and children as shall be at house conventicles2 and the double of these respective fines for each of the said persons who shall be at any field conventicles1 c4 ,and upon refusal of said bond1 they were to be put to the horn1 and their escheat or forfeiture given to their masters4 ,they likewise1 at the same time1 issued forth another proclamation1 for apprehending the holders of1 and repairers to1 field meetings1 by them designed rebels1 and whoever should seize such should have the fines1 so unjustly imposed1 for their reward2 with a particular sum offered for apprehending any of the conventicle preachers1 and this sum doubled for some that were more eminent among them1 and diligent in working the work of him that sent them1 against whom their malice was more especially turned4 ,these rigorous measures they continued to prosecute2 and in the year #afge1 letters of intercommuning were given out against several ministers and private ,christians1 by name1 both denouncing them rebels1 and secluding them from all society in the kingdom of ,scotland2 further requiring1 that no accommodation should be given1 or communication any manner of way held with them1 under the pain of being 7according to them7 accounted socii criminis1 and pursued as guilty1 with them1 of the same crimes4 ,these inhuman and unprecedented methods reduced the sufferers to many wanderings and great hardships4 ,it is impossible to recite the miseries these faithful confessors underwent--wandering about in deserts1 in mountains1 in dens1 and in caves of the earth1 destitute1 afflicted1 tormented2 besides the other severe impositions upon the country in general1 the bonds imposed1 and rage of the ,highland host then raised1 which1 together with the soldiers1 greatly spoiled and robbed the west country especially1 by which means1 poor people were brought to very low circumstances4 #g4 ,notwithstanding of all the tyranny and treachery hitherto exercised1 the word of ,,god grew1 and converts unto ,,christ1 and the obedience of the gospel1 were daily multiplied2 ministers being forward and willing to preach1 and the people willing to hear and receive the law from their mouth1 on all hazards4 ,and the ,,lord ,,jesus1 following his word and ordinances with his blessing1 showed himself as mighty and powerful in the open fields1 whither they were driven1 as ever he had done in their churches1 from whence they were driven1 and which were now shut against them1 and filled with time-servers1 and antichrist's vassals4 ,but against ,,christ',s standard and banner thus displayed1 the tyrant ,charles ,,ii erected his opposite standard for the utter destruction of ,,christ',s true servants and subjects4 ,and having declared their lawful meetings for the worship of ,,god1 according to his word1 execrable rendezvouses of rebellion2 a convention of estates1 anno #afgh1 was called and met1 by which a large cess was imposed to maintain an additional army1 for the suppression of the true religion and liberty1 and securing tyranny and arbitrary government4 ,on account of the imposition of this cess1 and the rigorous exaction of it1 together with the cruelties and ravages of this new army maintained by it 7the soldiers having commission to dismiss and disperse their meetings1 disarm1 imprison and kill preachers and people1 in case of resistance2 and a price being put upon the heads of several faithful ministers if brought to the council dead or alive71 both ministers and people were laid under the necessity of carrying arms for their own defense when dispensing and attending upon gospel ordinances4 ,and it was no wonder that1 finding themselves thus appointed as sheep for the slaughter1 they looked upon this as their duty1 and accordingly provided themselves with arms for their necessary defense against the wicked violence of those who thirsted after their blood1 and 7which was to them much more dear and precious7 the ruin and destruction of the cause1 interest1 and gospel of ,,christ in the land4 ,unto these severe and hellish measures fallen upon at this time1 for the more effectual suppression and extirpation of the gospel of ,,christ1 and professors of it1 the managers were principally instigated by that arch-apostate ,sharp2 though a bad preparative for his exit out of this world1 which soon came to pass1 anno #afgi1 in the dispensation of adorable providence and righteous judgment of ,god1 executed upon such a notorious traitor1 who1 having first betrayed the church1 and all along deeply imbrued his hands in the blood of ,,god',s saints and servants2 had blood given him to drink because he was worthy4 #h4 ,that the land might be more deeply soaked with blood1 and made more heavily to groan under the inhabitants thereof1 ,who had transgressed the laws1 changed the ordinances1 and broken the everlasting covenant2 that the scene of cruel suffering might be more widely opened1 and the bloody tragedy more effectually acted2 the primate's death must now be added to the other pretended crimes of the sufferers4 ,many were terribly harrassed on that account1 who were no ways concerned in the action2 and some were cruelly tortured and butchered by them for the same cause1 though innocent thereof 7for none of the actors did ever fall into their hands74 ,these enemies were hereby rendered more rude1 barbarous and hard-hearted to all the sufferers who afterward fell into their hands1 and breathed out threatenings and slaughter against the whole body of the persecuted ,presbyterians through the nation4 ,all this1 however1 did not dispirit these zealous witnesses1 or discourage them from attending to their work and duty2 for we find them on the #bith of ,may1 #afgi1 publishing their testimony at ,rutherglen1 against the wicked anniversary1 on the same day appointed by the court for its celebration1 and against all that had been done publicly by these enemies of ,,christ for the overthrow of his work and interest in the lands4 ,they likewise committed their acts rescissory1 supremacy1 act restoring abjured ,prelacy1 act of ,glasgow1 #affb1 the presumptuous act for appointing ,may #bith for an unholy anniversary1 indulgences1 c41 all to the flames1 their just desert1 in retaliation of the impious treatment given unto our solemn and sacred covenants1 and other good and laudable acts and laws for reformation1 by their sacrilegious enemies in sundry cities of these covenanted kingdoms4 ,and so1 after extinguishing the bonfires1 a part of the unholy solemnity of the enemies' anniversary day1 and concluding what they had done with prayer and praise1 as they had begun 7,mr4 ,douglas1 one of their ministers being along with them71 they withdrew4 ,this ,christian valor was followed with the ,,lord',s appearance for them1 in a remarkable manner1 on the following ,sabbath at ,drumclog near ,lowdonhill1 where being attacked by ,claverhouse1 when attending on public worship1 they completely routed him and his troops1 rescued ,mr4 ,john ,king1 and a number of other prisoners1 whom ,claverhouse had seized that morning1 from their hands4 ,afterward they declared the grounds and causes of their present defensive posture1 in that short manifesto1 or declaration1 published at ,glasgow1 ,june #fth1 #afgi4 ,but when their numbers multiplied1 their divisions increased1 and lawful means for honestly defending the cause were by the majority refused4 ,mr4 ,welsh and that ,erastian party with him1 being by this time come up1 did in their declaration at ,hamilton1 take in the tyrant's interest2 against which1 those who were honest and faithful to the interest of ,zion's king contended1 and protested1 that in conscience they could not take in the interest of one into the state of the quarrel who had manifestly stated himself in opposition to the interest of ,,christ2 that it was inconsistent with the covenant1 which could not bind them to espouse the interest of its destroyers1 and the destroyers of all that adhered to it2 and also contrary to their testimony and declaration for the covenants and work of reformation at ,rutherglen1 ,glasgow1 c41 and against all defection from the same4 ,thus1 when the most part in a great measure forsook the ,,lord1 he was justly provoked to forsake them1 and their great divisions landing them in such confusion1 they became an easy prey to the enemy1 by whom they were totally routed at ,bothwell1 ,june4 #bb;d1 #afgi1 where they felt the dismal fruits and consequences of joining at all with that ,erastian faction1 after they had openly declared and discovered what they were4 ,this was so far from proving any defense to them1 notwithstanding the numbers of that party1 that it proved their destruction4 ,and those whose hearts were upright and honest in the cause of ,,god1 by their means1 in holy sovereignty1 were made to fall a sacrifice to their enemies' wrath4 ,the slain on that day were many1 and the after-cruelty to prisoners great2 they being carried into and kept for a long time in the ,gray-friars church yard of ,edinburgh1 exposed1 defenseless1 night and day1 to tempests of all kinds4 ,by this inhuman usage 7with design to wear out the saints of the ,most ,high71 together with the insinuations and persuasions of some of the indulgence favorers1 their faith failing them in this hour of temptation1 and fear prevailing1 a number of these prisoners were persuaded to take the insnaring bond of peace1 whereby they were engaged to own their rising at ,bothwell to be rebellion1 and to oblige themselves never to rise in arms against the king1 and to live peaceably1 c41 while others of them were tortured1 not accepting deliverance4 #i4 ,although this defeat and dispersion of the espousers of the truth and cause of ,,christ1 in opposition both to its avowed enemies and secret betrayers1 brought the remnant that were left into very melancholy circumstances1 their enemies having in a great measure extinguished the light of the gospel1 by apprehending and shedding the blood of their faithful pastors1 who used to hold forth the word of life unto them1 as a light whereby they might discern between sin and duty2 and others who had formerly been helpful unto them1 in strengthening their hands1 and encouraging their hearts1 in the way of their duty1 were overtaken and overborne with fainting and discouragement2 so that1 in respect of public guides1 they wore at this time as sheep without a shepherd4 ,yet1 in this disconsolate and scattered state and condition1 ,,christ1 the chief shepherd1 had compassion on them1 and raised up those two faithful ministers and zealous contenders for the faith once delivered to the saints1 ,messrs4 ,richard ,cameron and ,donald ,cargill1 to come forth for the help of the ,,lord against the mighty1 and to jeopard their lives along with his people in the high places of the field1 in bearing faithful testimony for his noble truths and cause1 and against all the sins and defections of the time4 ,the first of these1 soon after he had showed his activity and zeal in that banner displayed against the church's enemies1 in the declaration published at ,sanquhar1 ,june #bb;d1 #ajhj1 did honorably and bravely finish his course1 among many others of ,zion's true friends1 in the defeat they again sustained at ,airsmoss1 where1 in imitation of his princely ,master1 he valiantly fought his way to the incorruptible crown4 ,the latter afterward narrowly escaped his enemies' hands 7by means of ,mr4 ,henry ,hall1 of ,haughhead1 that honest sufferer for truth1 who1 to save his minister's life1 lost his own2 on whom the ,queensferry paper1 a draft of a covenant engagement unto certain duties1 was found71 and was1 by the power and providence of ,,god1 preserved1 until he accomplished that signal piece of generation work in drawing forth the sword of excommunication against the tyrant ,charles ,,ii1 and some others of the chief actors in that bloody tragedy4 ,and that1 because of their bloodshed1 perjury1 heaven-daring profaneness1 debauchery1 inhuman and savage cruelty acted upon the people of ,,god4 ,the which sentence stuck fast in the hearts of these enemies of ,zion's king unto the day of their death1 and1 by some of their own acknowledgments1 would through eternity4 ,shortly after this1 that faithful minister crowned his work with martyrdom1 and entered into his ,master's joy4 ,this murdering period spared neither pastor nor people1 age nor sex2 while gross transgressors1 and deluded enthusiasts1 as ,gib and his faction1 were screened from condign punishment1 though some of them had arrived at that prodigious length in wickedness as to commit the ,holy ,scriptures and ,confession of ,faith to the flames4 #aj4 ,so many of these once living and lively witnesses for ,,christ being1 now slain1 and what was yet surviving of the scattered flock deprived of their painful shepherds1 and not being able to drink of the sanctuary waters1 so muddied by their former pastors1 who had defiled the same by sinful compliance with the time's defections1 they resolved1 under divine direction1 to gather themselves together into a general meeting1 for advising and informing one another anent their duty1 in such critical times of common danger1 that so whatever concerned the whole1 might be done with due deliberation and common consent4 ,the which general meetings afterward afforded them both good comfort amidst their discouragements1 and also good counsel amidst their perplexities and doubts1 and proved an excellent expedient for preserving the remnant from the destruction and contagion of the times1 propagation of the testimony1 and keeping alive the public spirit of zeal and concern for the cause and interest of ,,christ2 and for these ends they have been kept up ever since4 ,in the meantime1 that evil instrument1 ,james1 duke of ,york1 receiving commission from his perjured brother to preside in the whole administration of ,scots' affairs1 upon his arrival for this effect1 held a parliament1 which began ,july #bhth1 #afha2 wherein1 besides other of his wicked acts1 that detestable1 blasphemous1 and self-contradictory test was framed1 which1 in the first part thereof1 contains the swearer's solemn declaration1 by oath1 of his sincere profession of the true ,protestant religion1 contained in the first confession of faith1 ratified by ,parl4 #ast1 ,james ,,vi1 #aefg 7which confession asserts1 in the strongest terms1 ,,christ',s alone headship and supremacy as lawgiver and king in his church1 without copartner or competitor71 and that he shall adhere thereunto all the days of his life1 and renounce all doctrines1 principles1 or practices contrary thereto1 and inconsistent therewith2 while1 in manifest contradiction thereto1 the blasphemous supremacy1 in the utmost extent thereof1 is asserted--the ,covenants ,national and ,solemn ,league1 the chief barriers against ,popery1 ,erastianism1 and arbitrary power1 are renounced1 and unlimited allegiance unto the occupant is enjoined and sworn to1 and the prelatical government of the church confirmed4 ,this oath was at first administered to those in public trust only1 and thereby all were turned out of their places who had any principles of common honesty remaining in them2 but afterward it was imposed on all persons of all ranks4 ,against which sinful encroachments on religion and liberty1 the witnessing persecuted remnant accounted themselves bound in duty to emit their testimony1 which they published at ,lanerk1 ,january #abth1 #afhb1 adhering to1 and confirming their former at ,sanquhar1 and giving reasons at length for their disowning the unlawful authority of ,charles ,,ii4 ,upon intelligence hereof1 this declaration1 with those at ,rutherglen and ,sanquhar1 were1 by order of the council1 with great solemnity1 burnt at the cross of ,edinburgh1 by the magistrates in their robes1 together with the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 which had been burnt formerly3 but now they would give new demonstrations of their rage against it1 in conjunction with these declarations1 which they saw and acknowledged were evidently conformed to1 and founded upon it4 ,after the publication of this testimony1 the sufferings of that poor people that owned it were sadder and sharper than ever before1 by hunting1 pursuing1 apprehending1 imprisonment1 banishment1 death1 and torture2 this increasing rage1 oppression1 cruelty1 and bloodshed1 being no more than what they might look for1 agreeable to the spirit and principles of that popish incendiary1 to whom such trust was committed4 #aa4 ,the poor wrestling remnant1 besides their other grievous calamities and sufferings1 being now obnoxious to much censure1 in their appearances for truth reproached1 and invidiously misrepresented1 both at home and abroad1 by those that were at ease in ,zion1 as having forsaken the right way1 and run into wild1 extravagant1 and unhappy courses2 and1 withal1 being at this time destitute and deprived of their public standard bearers2 their series of witnesses 7since the death of ,messrs4 ,cameron and ,cargill7 maintaining the testimony against the public national defections being in all appearance interrupted1 except by martyrdom and sufferings2 they were obliged to exert themselves1 both for their vindication from those calumnies and slanders1 wherewith they were loaded by their enemies1 to foreign ,protestant churches especially1 and for obtaining a supply of gospel ministers4 ,wherefore1 sending some of their number abroad1 to represent the righteousness of their cause to the churches there1 and crave their sympathy1 in helping them to a supply of gospel ministers2 the ,,lord was graciously pleased to countenance and bless their endeavors so1 that they obtained access for the instruction and ordination of young men for the ministry1 at a university in the ,united ,provinces2 and1 in process of time1 gave them a great reviving in their bondage1 by sending forth his faithful embassador1 ,mr4 ,james ,renwick1 who1 while he stood on ,zion's watch-tower1 ceased not night and day to give faithful warning of the danger approaching the city of ,,god1 evidently discovering his being clothed with his ,master's commission1 in bearing faithful testimony and witness1 both against the avowed enemies of truth and backsliders from it4 ,and notwithstanding all the malicious rage of deadly foes1 ranging and keenly pursuing him1 through open or more secret places1 the reproach of tongues and cruel mockings he endured1 by the divine blessing1 on his painful labors1 amidst his many hardships1 the number of ,zion's friends were greatly increased1 by the incoming and joining of many to the fellowship of their settled societies1 who resolutely chose rather to suffer affliction with the people of ,,god than to enjoy the pleasures of sin1 which are but for a season4 ,upon this further attack upon ,satan's interest1 his emissaries issue forth fresh orders1 and give commission to soldiers1 foot and dragoons1 to hunt1 search1 and seek them out of all their most secret dens1 caves1 and lurking places1 where they might hide themselves1 in the most remote and wildest glens and recesses in the mountains and deserts1 allowing them to kill1 slay1 destroy1 and any way to make an end of them1 wherever they might be found2 commanding the whole country1 at their peril1 to assist them1 and raise the hue and cry after the poor wanderers1 and not to reset1 harbor1 succor1 or correspond with them any manner of way1 under the highest pains1 but to do their utmost in informing against them4 ,thus1 without regard to any of their unlawful forms of legal procedure1 they defiled and besmeared the high places of the field with innocent blood4 ,these unprecedented methods and measures obliged the sufferers1 for their own preservation1 stopping the deluge of blood1 and to deter the insolence of intelligencers and informers1 to publish the apologetic declaration1 which they affixed on several market crosses1 and parish church doors1 upon the #bhth of ,october1 #afhd2 wherein they declare their firm resolution of constant adherence to their covenanted engagements2 and to the declaration disowning the authority of ,charles ,stuart1 warning all bloody ,doegs and flattering ,ziphites1 to expect to be dealt with as they deal with them2 to be regarded as enemies to ,,god1 and the covenanted reformation1 and according to their power1 and the degree of their offense1 punished as such1 c4 ,after this declaration1 these enemies were still more enraged1 and their fury flamed more than ever formerly4 ,they framed an oath1 commonly called the oath of abjuration1 renouncing and abjuring the same1 and by a venomous bloody proclamation1 enjoined this oath to be taken by all universally1 from sixteen years and upward1 women as well as men1 under pain of death2 and many prisoners who having the oath tendered them1 refused or declined it1 were sentenced1 and executed all in one day1 according to the tenor of their proclamation4 ,and1 moreover1 they1 on this occasion1 renewed their orders and commission to the soldiers1 for pursuing and chasing after the rebels 7as they designed them7 more vigorously and violently1 and to shoot1 or otherwise put them to death wherever they did light upon them4 ,in the midst of this confusion of slaughter and bloodshed1 ,,god cut off by death1 ,february #fth1 #afhe1 that vile person1 the author and authorizer of all this mischief1 ,charles ,,ii1 who1 ,antiochus like1 came in peaceably1 and obtained the kingdom by flattery 7,dan4 xi71 reigned treacherously and bloodily1 and like that wicked king1 ,jehoram 7#b ,chron4 xxi71 died without being desired or lamented1 poisoned1 as was thought1 by his unnatural popish brother4 ,and1 notwithstanding of all his bastards1 begotten in adultery and fornication1 at home and abroad1 he died without any to succeed him1 save him that was said to have murdered him4 ,,god pursued him with the curse of ,hiel the ,bethelite1 for his rebuilding of that cursed ,jericho1 prelacy2 and of that impious and wicked tyrant1 ,coniah 7,jer4 xxii71 for his treachery and cruelty2 ,thus saith the ,,lord1 ,write ye this man childless1 a man that shall not prosper in his days1 for no man of his seed shall prosper1 sitting any more upon the throne of ,israel4 #ab4 ,notwithstanding the abundant proof that the duke of ,york had given1 in many instances1 and in both kingdoms1 of his being a vassal of antichrist1 and notwithstanding of his open and public profession of papistry1 upon his brother's death1 fairly warning all what they might expect1 yet were not those1 who sat at the helm of affairs1 deterred from committing the reins of government into his hands2 but contrary to the word of ,god1 and fundamental laws of the lands1 this professed and excommunicate papist ,james1 duke of ,york1 was1 anno #afhe1 proclaimed king of these once covenanted1 but now treacherous and apostate lands1 whereby they appointed themselves a captain to return into their anti-christian bondage4 ,to this grievous yoke our infamous1 perjured1 and apostate state and council in ,scotland1 heartily and voluntarily subjected themselves and the nation1 while others did it with reluctancy1 caressing and embracing with their dearest and best affections1 this enemy to ,,god1 and ,,christ1 and his church1 swearing implicit and unlimited obedience unto him1 and asserting his absolute power and supremacy1 indefeasible and hereditary right1 without ever so much as requiring him to take the coronation oath1 or give the least security for1 any thing civil or religious 7a depth of degeneracy1 parallel to that eminency in reformation purity1 from which they were fallen67 but laid the reins on his own neck1 that he might have full freedom for the satisfying of his lusts1 and fulfilling his wicked designs4 ,this laid religion1 liberty1 and all1 at the mercy of absolute power and popish tyranny2 and still more and more cut off the people of ,god from having any hopes of mercy from their bloody enemies2 on the contrary1 the duke of ,york1 in his letter to his first parliament1 recommends and requires them to leave no means unattempted1 for the extirpation of the poor wandering sufferers1 whom he brands with the odious names of murderers and assassins1 wild and inhuman traitors1 c4 ,and these his ready servants and bloody executioners1 came nothing short of his orders in the execution of them2 so that there were more murdered in cold blood in the open fields1 without all shadow of law1 trial or sentence1 more banished and sold as slaves1 condemned and executed1 c41 in the time of this usurper1 than in all the time of the former tyrant4 ,as the honest sufferers1 consistent with their testimony for truth1 in opposition both to the secret and open subvertors of the cause and state of ,zion's quarrel with her enemies1 could not concur in ,argyle's declaration 7although there were many things in it materially good1 and commend-worthy71 nor join in a military association with him1 on account 7among other things7 of the too promiscuous admission of persons to trust in that party1 who were then1 and afterward discovered themselves to be1 enemies to the cause4 ,yet1 against this usurpation of a bloody papist1 advancing himself to the throne in such a manner1 they published another declaration at ,sanquhar1 ,may #bh1 #afhe2 wherein1 approving of1 and adhering to all their former1 and considering that ,james1 duke of ,york1 a professed and excommunicated papist1 was proclaimed3 they protest against said proclamation1 with reasons subjoined at length for their so doing--against all kinds of popery1 general and particular heads1 as abjured by the national covenant--against its entry again into this land1 and every thing that doth1 or may directly or indirectly1 make way for the same1 c4 ,after this1 ,mr4 ,renwick and his followers were exposed to the greater fury of their adversaries2 more cruel edicts were given forth against them1 approving and ratifying of former acts1 for raising the hue and cry1 c41 whereby their calamities were very much increased1 besides the slanders of professed friends1 on account of their not associating and joining with them in their compliances1 although1 to the conviction of all unbiassed minds1 they fully vindicated themselves from all their injurious reflections4 ,the extirpation of the ,presbyterian interest--nay1 the suppression of the ,protestant religion in general1 the reintroduction of popery1 and plunging the nations in anti-christian darkness and tyranny1 being the long concerted design of this popish bigot now got into the throne2 he resolves to lose no time1 and leave no stone unturned1 for the prosecution and accomplishment thereof4 ,and having made tolerable progress in the execution of this his favorite scheme 7although not without opposition71 in ,england1 he turns himself to ,scotland1 expecting an entire acquiescence in his pleasure there1 having found the first parliament1 which began1 #bc;d ,may1 #afhe1 so much according to his own heart1 in their hearty and sincere offer of their lives and fortunes1 to assist1 defend1 and maintain him in his rights1 prerogatives1 sacred1 supreme1 and absolute power and authority1 c4 ,wherefore1 the parliament being to meet again ,april #bi1 #afhf1 in his letter to them1 he heartily recommends to their care his innocent ,roman ,catholic subjects1 to the end1 that as they have given good experience of their true loyalty and peaceable behavior1 they may have the protection of his laws1 without lying under obligations their religion could not admit of2 that all penal laws made against them might be repealed1 c4 ,but though many were for obliging their king in this particular1 yet it could not be carried without debates and strong objections2 so that1 dissolving the parliament1 what he could not obtain there1 with any show or face of law1 he effectuates1 by virtue of the prerogative royal and absolute power1 in a letter to his privy council1 and proclamation inclosed1 bearing date ,february #ab1 #afhg1 granting a royal toleration to moderate ,presbyterians1 clogged with a number of grievous ,erastian conditions and restrictions1 as usual4 ,secondly1 to ,quakers and other enthusiasts4 ,thirdly1 to ,papists1 abrogating all penal statutes made against them1 and making them in all respects free4 ,and so devoted were the privy council to his interests1 that without demur they published the proclamation1 and wrote back to the king1 that his orders were punctually obeyed1 thanking him for this further proof of his favors to all his subjects4 ,thus1 this champion for ,satan and antichrist proceeded with his wicked design1 and so far succeeded2 all kinds of papistry were publicly practiced1 and many churches converted to mass chapels4 ,for1 before this1 by the king's letter to his privy council1 of ,august #bast1 #afhf1 ,papists were allowed the free exercise of their religion1 the council required to support and maintain them therein1 and the royal chapel at ,holyrood-,house ordered to be repaired for popish service4 ,by which means a door was opened for that swarm of ,jesuits and priests1 ascending as locusts out of the bottomless pit1 which quickly overspread the lands4 ,but notwithstanding of all this indulgence and royal toleration granted to these three forementioned parties1 yet there is no favor nor mercy for the honest and faithful sufferers1 and honorable contenders for the interests and prerogatives royal of ,,jesus ,,christ1 against his sacrilegious and blasphemous usurpation of the same4 ,but while he thinks fit to give ease 7as himself says7 by this means1 to tender consciences1 he at the same time signifies his highest indignation against those enemies of ,christianity 7he means ,popery7 as well as government1 and human society1 the field-conventiclers1 whom he recommends to the council to root out1 with all the severity of the laws1 and the most rigorous persecution of the forces1 it being equally his1 and his people's concern to get rid of them4 ,in consequence of this1 all their artillery is directed against the ,rev4 ,mr4 ,james ,renwick only1 and that poor1 afflicted1 and persecuted people that adhered to him 7all others being comprehended in the pretended liberty granted71 so that they were prosecuted with fire and sword1 and according to the utmost severity of their wicked laws made against them1 and a reward of a hundred pounds sterling offered by the bloody council to any that should bring in ,mr4 ,renwick to them1 either dead or alive4 ,but he having his generation work allotted and cut out for him by ,,god1 was preserved and kept from falling into their hands1 until that he had finished the work his ,master had given him to do1 notwithstanding all this hellish and anti-christian rage and fury wherewith they did pursue him4 ,about the beginning of the year #afhf1 he1 in conjunction with ,mr4 ,alexander ,shields1 who had lately joined him1 wrote the ,informatory ,vindication1 by way of reply to various accusations in letters1 informations and conferences1 given forth against them and their people1 wherein they vindicate1 clear and justify themselves from the heavy and false charges1 slanders and reproaches1 cast upon them by their enemies1 as may be seen in said book4 ,about this time1 also1 ,mr4 ,shields set about writing his ,hind let loose 7which was published next year71 or1 ,a ,historical ,representation of the ,testimonies of the ,church of ,scotland for the interest of ,,christ1 with the true state thereof in all its periods2 wherein he also solidly1 soundly1 and judiciously vindicates the present testimony1 in all the principles thereof1 as stated1 against the popish1 prelatical1 and malignant enemies of that church1 for the prerogatives of ,,christ1 privileges of the church and liberties of mankind1 and sealed by the sufferings of a reproached remnant of ,presbyterians there1 witnessing against the corruptions of the time4 ,whilst these two loving and faithful fellow-laborers were thus industriously exerting themselves for the propagation and vindication of the persecuted gospel1 and cause of ,,christ2 that fiery ,jesuit1 popish tyrant1 and enemy to ,,god and man1 the duke of ,york1 and his popish party1 were equally industrious on the other hand1 to promote their grand design of utterly extinguishing the light of the gospel1 and bringing in ,antichrist1 with all his poisonous and hellish vermin1 and abominable idolatries2 and that1 with all the murdering violence1 diabolical subtilty and malignant rage that hell and ,rome could invent and exert4 ,he had formerly published a proclamation 7as is noticed above71 granting a lawless liberty to several sorts of persons therein specified1 called his first indulgence2 but breathing nothing but threatenings and slaughter against the people of ,,god1 who stood firm to his cause4 ,but withal1 this proclamation1 enjoined an oath in the room of all oaths formerly imposed1 to be taken by all that minded to share in his royal favor2 wherein they swore1 not only absolute subjection and passive obedience1 never to resist him1 not only on any pretense1 but for any cause1 let him do1 or command to be done what he would2 but also1 absolute1 active obedience1 without reserve3 ,that they shall1 to the utmost of their power1 assist1 defend1 and maintain him1 his heirs and successors1 in the exercise of their absolute power and authority1 against all deadly4 ,this was so palpably gross and odious1 that it was disdained and abhorred by all that had common sense4 ,wherefore1 finding that this proposal did not take1 nor answer his design1 in a letter to the council1 bearing date about a month after the former1 he endeavors to mend the matter1 and set it out in another dress1 pretending that they had mistaken his meaning in the former1 and so lets them know1 that it is his pleasure now1 that if the ,presbyterian preachers do scruple to take the oath 7contained in the proclamation71 or any other oath whatsoever1 they1 notwithstanding1 have the benefit of his indulgence 7without being obliged to take the oath71 provided they observe the conditions on which it was granted4 ,but this not having the desired effect neither1 it is followed with the third indulgence or toleration1 emitted by proclamation1 dated #bhth ,june1 #afhg1 excellently well calculated for obtaining his end2 wherein1 after a solemn declaration of his intention to maintain his archbishops and bishops1 he does1 by his sovereign authority1 prerogative royal1 and absolute power1 suspend1 stop and disable1 all penal and sanguinary laws1 made against any for non-conformity to the religion established by law--granting liberty to all the subjects to meet and serve ,,god1 after their own way1 in private houses or chapels1 or places purposely hired or built for that use1 with an injunction to take care that nothing be preached or taught1 that might any way tend to alienate the hearts of the people from him and his government3 but1 notwithstanding the premises1 strictly prohibiting all field meetings1 against all which all his laws and acts of parliament are left in full force and vigor2 and all his judges1 magistrates and officers of forces1 commanded to prosecute such as shall be guilty of said field conventicles1 with the utmost rigor2 and all this under pretense1 that now1 after this his royal grace and favor1 there is not the least shadow of excuse left for these meetings4 ,wherefore1 he is confident1 that none will1 after these liberties and freedoms given to all1 to serve ,god in their own way1 further presume to meet in these assemblies1 except such as make a pretense of religion1 to cover their treasonable designs against his royal person1 and peace of his government4 ,the most of the ,presbyterian ministers in ,scotland took the benefit of this wicked and boundless toleration1 chiefly designed in favor of ,papists4 ,and a large number of them1 being met at ,edinburgh1 agreed upon1 and1 in name of all the rest1 sent an address of thanks to the tyrant for his toleration1 stuffed with the most loathsome and blasphemous flatteries1 to the dishonor of ,,god1 the reproach of his cause1 and betraying of his church4 ,for1 in this address1 dated ,july #bast1 #afhg1 designating themselves the loyal subjects of this true religion and liberty destroyer1 they offer him their most humble and hearty thanks for his favor bestowed1 and bless the great ,,god who put it into his heart to grant them this liberty1 which they term a great and surprising favor1 professing a fixed resolution still to maintain an entire loyalty1 both in their doctrine and practice 7consonant to their known1 principles1 which1 according to the holy ,scriptures1 are contained in the ,confession of ,faith72 and they humbly beseech1 that any who promote disloyal principles and practices 7as they disown them7 may not be looked upon as any of theirs1 whatever name they may assume to themselves2 and that1 as their address comes from the plainness and sincerity of loyal and thankful hearts1 so they were much engaged by his royal favor1 to continue their fervent prayer to the ,king of kings1 for divine illumination and conduct1 and all other blessings1 both spiritual and temporal1 ever to attend his person and government4 ,thus these men made themselves naked to their shame1 and declared to the world1 that they did only presumptuously arrogate to themselves the name of ,presbyterians2 whereas1 in reality1 they were quite another kind of creatures1 acting diametrically opposite to ,presbyterian principles1 in congratulating1 extolling and justifying a tyrant1 for assuming to himself a blasphemous1 absolute power1 whereby he suspends and disables all penal laws against idolators1 and gives a toleration for all errors4 ,but while these pretended ,presbyterians1 who all along loved peace better than truth1 and preferred their own ease before the concerns of their ,master's glory1 were thus sheltering themselves under this refuge of lies2 true ,presbyterians1 who kept by presbyterian principles1 and acted a faithful part for ,,christ1 refusing to bow down to the idol of supremacy1 which the tyrant had set up1 or pay any regard to his blasphemous toleration1 were pursued1 persecuted1 and slain1 without pity or compassion1 all the engines of the court being leveled against them for their destruction1 because they would still reserve to themselves the liberty wherewith ,,christ had made his people free1 and not exchange it for one from ,antichrist1 restricted with his reserves and limitations2 so that 7as ,mr4 ,shields tells us in his account of ,mr4 ,james ,renwick's life71 in less than five months after the toleration1 there were fifteen most desperate searches particularly for him1 both of foot and horse3 and1 that all encouragement might be given to any who would apprehend him1 a proclamation was issued1 dated ,october #ahth1 ,authorizing all officers1 civil and military1 to apprehend and secure in firmance his person1 with some others2 and for encouragement1 insuring the sum of #ajj sterling for taking him1 or them1 dead or alive4 ,in the midst of all these hazards1 this unwearied and faithful laborer did notwithstanding continue at his work1 in preaching1 catechising1 c41 and the ,lord still preserved him from falling into the enemy's hand1 until he had finished that piece of generation work1 in drawing up a full and faithful testimony against ,york's toleration1 and for the covenants and work of reformation1 c41 which he gave in to a meeting of ,presbyterian ministers at ,edinburgh1 on the #agth ,january1 #afhh2 and going thence to ,fife1 whither he was called to preach1 in his return1 was apprehended at ,edinburgh1 and called to seal his above testimony1 with all his other contendings against ,popery1 ,prelacy1 ,erastianism1 and all defection from the land's attainments in reformation1 with his blood1 which he did in the ,grass market of ,edinburgh1 #agth of ,february1 #afhh1 with a remarkable and extraordinary measure of the ,lord's gracious presence and spirit1 not only in this part of his sufferings1 but all the time of his imprisonment4 ,the ,lord hereby bearing witness1 both to the truth of that cause for which he suffered1 and also testifying his gracious acceptance of his sufferings1 and of the free-will-offering of his life1 which he laid down for his sake4 ,and as neither the violence nor flattery of enemies could prevail with this faithful confessor and martyr himself1 to quit with one hair or hoof of what belonged to ,christ1 so he recommended to the poor scattered remnant which he left1 as part of his dying counsel1 to keep their ground1 and not to quit nor forego one of these despised truths1 which he was assured the ,lord1 when he returned to bind up the breach of his people1 and heal them of their wound1 would make glorious in the earth4 ,thus that worthy minister1 and now glorified martyr of ,jesus1 through a chain of sufferings1 and train of enemies1 fought his way unto an incorruptible and immortal crown of endless glory4 ,he was the last that sealed the testimony for religion and liberty1 and the covenanted work of reformation1 against ,popery1 ,prelacy1 ,erastianism1 and tyranny1 in a public manner1 on the scaffold1 with his blood4 ,after the death of this renowned martyr1 he was succeeded by the eminent ,mr4 ,alexander ,shields1 who carried on1 and maintained1 the testimony1 as it was stated1 in all the heads and clauses thereof1 continuing to preach in the fields4 ,on which account1 he1 and the people who attended his ministry1 were exposed for some time longer to the fury and resentment of their enemies4 ,but their power1 which they had so long perverted and abused1 quickly came to a period4 ,for in a few months1 ,god1 in his righteous judgment and adorable providence1 overturned that throne of iniquity on which they depended1 and expelled that inhuman1 cruel monster1 from his tyrannical and usurped power1 upon the prince of ,orange's coming over into ,england1 in the beginning of ,november that same year4 ,but1 although the ,lord at this juncture1 and by this means1 rescued and delivered our natural and civil rights and privileges in a national way from under the oppression and bondage of anti-christian tyranny1 arbitrary and absolute power1 yet the ,revolution1 at this time1 brought no real deliverance to the church of ,god4 ,but ,christ's rights1#a formerly acquired for him by his faithful servants1 lay still buried under the rubbish of that anti-christian building of ,prelacy1 erected on the ruins of his work in this land2 and the spiritual liberties and privileges of his house remained1 and do still remain under the bondage of ,erastianism1 supremacy1 toleration1 c4 ,for it is well known1 that although this man1 ,jehu-like1 destroyed ,baal out of ,israel1 yet he departed not from the sins of ,jeroboam1 wherewith he made ,israel to sin4 ,about this time1 the united societies 7having no actual minister since ,mr4 ,renwick's death1 ,mr4 ,shields being only preacher7 sent over some commissioners from their general meeting to ,embden1 one of the ,united ,provinces1 to bring over ,mr4 ,thomas ,linning1 a young man whom they had sent thither some years before in ,mr4 ,renwick's time1 to the university there1 and for ordination4 ,in consequence hereof1 the said ,mr4 ,linning came home1 with testimonials of his ordination to the ministry by the classes at ,embden2 and in conjunction with ,mr4 ,shields and ,mr4 ,william ,boyd 7another of their ministers1 who had also come from ,holland about this time71 renewed the ,covenants ,national and ,solemn ,league1 and dispensed the sacrament of the ,lord's supper near ,lesmahago1 in ,clydesdale1 and continued to preach to the people for about four months1 until the first ,general ,assembly 7so called7 met at ,edinburgh #afhi-ij4 ,at which time1 he1 with his two brethren1 in their own name1 and the name of their people1 presented a paper to that ,assembly1 bearing on what terms they and their people would join in communion with them2 only craving that they might all join in humbling themselves before the ,lord1 and acknowledge and bewail their fathers'1 their own1 and the land's many and heinous iniquities1 and breaches of ,covenant1 before they proceeded to any other business1 and so have their public sins and scandalous compliances washed away by repentance1 and calling upon the name of the ,lord ,jesus4 ,that they would purge out from among them1 all ignorant1 insufficient1 heterodox1 and notoriously scandalous ministers1 such as1 by information1 accusation1 or otherways1 were guilty of the blood of the saints1 c4 ,but these proposals were reckoned unseasonable and impracticable1 tending rather to kindle contention1 than compose division1 and so were thrown over their bar4 ,the generality of these men were so plunged and puddled in the ditch of defection and apostasy1 that they could not think of the drudgery of cleansing themselves in ,god's way1 by a particular and public confession of1 and humiliation for their own and the land's public sins1 but chose rather to sit down filthy and polluted as they were1 and presume1 in the midst of their abominations unrepented of1 to approach ,god's holy things1 which1 how provoking to heaven1 let ,god in his word be judge1 ,isa4 lii1 #aa2 ,hag4 ii1 #ac1 #ad2 #b ,chr4 xxx1 #c2 ,ezek4 xliv1 #aj4 ,nay1 it is but too1 too evident1 that for this cause1 ,god then laid them under that awful sentence1 ,rev4 xxii1 #aa3 ,him that is filthy1 let him be filthy still2 or that1 ,isa4 xxii1 #ad4 ,for as their hearts were then hardened against ,god's call by his word and providence to that important and most necessary duty2 so1 ever since1 they1 have been so much the more so1 and have gone on from evil to worse4 ,but to return to our purpose3 the two brethren1 ,messrs4 ,linning and ,boyd1 upon the rejection of the above said paper of proposals1 intending to unite with them at any rate1 gave in another1 importing their submission to the assembly2 which paper1 ,mr4 ,shields also1 through their influences1 insinuations1 and persuasions1 was drawn in to subscribe and adhere to2 which he had never done1 had he not fallen by the means of these false brethren1 and which1 it is said1 he sadly repented afterward4 ,thus1 the poor people were again left destitute of ministers1 and public gospel ordinances1 until the ,rev4 ,mr4 ,john1 ,mc,millan acceded to them1 from the public judicatories of the revolution church1 in the year #agjf4 ,and their kind friend1 ,mr4 ,linning1 to make amends for all his misdemeanors1 and in return for the charges the societies were at about his education1 at home and abroad1 did them that good office1 to write1 and load them with calumnies and slanders1 to the universities in the ,netherlands1 whither they had recourse formerly in like cases2 so that all access for having their loss retrieved from that quarter1 was blocked up4 ,what is thus briefly hinted above1 may suffice to afford some cursory view of the rise and progress of religion and reformation in these lands1 especially in ,scotland2 until1 as a church and nation1 our kingdom became the ,lord's1 by the strictest and most intimate federal alliance1 and the name almost of every city1 was1 the ,lord is there3 together with the general state and condition of the church and land1 from the fatal juncture of our woful decline1 unto the end of the above mentioned bloody period2 the faithfulness of some1 in this time of trial and temptation3 the defection and backsliding course of others2 and the great and avowed wickedness of the rest1 extended unto an exhorbitant hight of savage inhumanity1 irreligion and impiety4 ,upon all which1 the presbytery1 in duty to ,god1 the present and succeeding generations find themselves obliged to testify3 #a1 ,their hearty approbation of the faithfulness of such ministers and others1 who opposed1 and faithfully testified against the public resolutions of church and state1 framed in the year #afea1 for receiving into places of power and trust1 malignant enemies to the work of reformation1 contrary to the word of ,god1 ,exod4 xviii1 #ba2 ,deut4 i1 #ac2 #b ,chron4 xix1 #b2 and to all acts of assembly and parliament in the reforming period2 the assembly disclaiming the resolutions1 as appears from their act1 ,june #agth1 #afdf1 session #adth1 entitled1 ,act for censuring the compilers with the public enemies of this church and kingdom3 and their seasonable and necessary warning ,june #bgth1 #afdj1 session #bgth2 where they judge it a great and scandalous provocation1 and grievous defection from the public cause1 to comply with1 these malignants1 c4 ,as also1 ,act #aath1 ,triennial ,parliament of1 ,charles ,i1 entitled1 ,act for purging the army of disaffected persons to the ,covenant and work of ,reformation4 ,and the faithful warnings1 given by general assemblies and parliament1 even against the admission of ,charles ,,ii to the regal dignity1 when so evidently discovering his disingenuity1 until once he should give more satisfying proof of hid sincerity2 see act of the commission at the ,west ,kirk1 ,august #acth1 #afej1 where the commission of the general assembly1 considering1 that there may be just ground of stumbling1 from the king's majesty's refusing to emit the declaration offered him by the committee of estates1 and the commission of the ,general ,assembly1 concerning his former carriage1 and resolution for the future1 in reference to the cause of ,god1 and enemies and friends thereof2 doth therefore declare ,that this kirk and kingdom do not espouse any malignant party1 quarrel1 or interest1 but that they fight merely upon their former grounds and principles1 and in the defense of the cause of ,,god1 and of the kingdom1 as they have done these twelve years past3 and therefore as they disclaim all the sin and guilt of the king and of his house1 so they will not own him nor his interest1 otherwise than with a subordination to ,,god1 and so far as he owns and prosecutes the cause of ,,god1 and disclaims his1 and his father's opposition to the work of ,,god and to the covenant1 c4 ,the which declaration being seen and considered by the committee of estates1 was the same day approven by them4 ,thus1 both church and state exerted themselves in the discharge of their duty1 in order to obtain a settlement1 according to the word of ,god1 and the covenants1 which were now become the magna charta of the privileges and liberties of the nations1 both civil and religious2 and therefore1 were sworn to and subscribed by ,charles ,,ii1 as was also the coronation oath1 for the security and preservation of the true religion1 at his receipt of the royal power4 #b4 ,the presbytery testify and declare their approbation of the conduct of the faithful1 before the restoration1 who1 adhering to the aforesaid fundamental constitutions of the nations1 both refused subjection unto1 and testified against1 the usurpation of ,oliver ,cromwell and his accomplices1 his invading the land1 his anti-christian toleration of all sectarian errors and heresies1 threatening the ruin and destruction of the true religion1 as well as liberty4 ,this was particularly testified against by the synod of ,fife1 and others in conjunction with them1 as wicked and intolerable2 as opposite unto1 and condemned by1 the ,scriptures of truth1 ,job xxxiv1 #ag2 ,deut4 xiii1 #a-ab2 ,zech4 xiii1 #c2 contrary to acts of assembly and parliament1 made against malignants1 their being received into places of power and trust1 with whom these sectarians were compliers1 such as ,act #afth1 of ,assemb4 #afdf1 ,sess4 #acth2 ,act #bfth1 ,sess4 #b;d1 parliament ,charles ,i1 c4 #c4 ,the presbytery do hereby heartily approve and homologate the testimony borne unto the truths and royal prerogatives of ,christ1 as ,king of ,zion1 by the witnesses and martyrs for the same1 from the restoration1 anno #affj1 to the late revolution1 by protestations1 declarations1 confiscation of goods1 bonds1 imprisonment1 banishment1 all kinds of cruelty and suffering1 even unto the death 7as noticed above71 by the impious revolters from the righteous laws of ,god1 and overturners of the just and equitable laws of men1 both sacred and civil2 to the maintenance whereof1 the greatest part of these transgressors had bound themselves by the most sacred and inviolable obligations1 which made their wickedness the more daring and aggravated1 and the testimony of the saints against such as had made themselves so vile in the sight of ,god and all good men1 the more justifiable4 ,psalm cxix1 #aci3 ,my zeal hath consumed me1 because mine enemies have forgotten thy words4 ,and as the doers of the law have the promise of justification by the great ,legislator1 ,rom4 ii1 #ac1 so they ought to have the approbation of his people for doing his will4 ,and as the ,spirit discovers the church's duty not to consist only in bearing witness unto the truth1 and justifying ,christ's confessors and martyrs1 in their faithful adherence unto it1 but also in testifying against sin1 and condemning the wicked for their wickedness2 for which1 also1 we have the precedent of the reformed and covenanted church of ,scotland1 both before and during the defection and wickedness of the forementioned period4 ,likeas1 the presbytery did1 and hereby do declare and testify particularly3 #a4 ,against that prime and leading step of defection1 the public resolutions1 a scheme projected by that arch hypocrite and traitor to ,god1 ,charles ,,ii1 for the reintroduction of men of the same wicked and malignant spirit with himself1 into places of public trust in the nation--men1 the most of whom had been formerly excommunicated by the church1 and excluded from all office-bearing in the commonwealth1 by the states1 in their act of classes1 as being avowed and obstinate enemies to ,god and to their country4 ,which scheme1 approven of and put in execution1 with the consent of a corrupt part of the ministry of the church1 called afterward resolutioners1 made way for that sad and bloody catastrophe1 which after befel the poor church of ,christ in this land4 #b4 ,they declare and testify against the usurpation of ,oliver ,cromwell1 with those who subjected themselves unto1 and owned1 his authority2 against his treacherous invasion of this land1 contrary to the public oaths and vows1 and covenant union of the nations2 together with his sectarian principles1 and wicked toleration1 then obtruded upon them4 #c4 ,they declare and testify against the restoration of ,charles ,,ii1 #affj1 unto the government of these covenanted lands1 after he had so plainly discovered his spirit and designs1 in the matter of the public resolutions4 ,on account of which treacherous and double dealing with ,god and man1 he was1 in the ,lord's holy and adorable providence1 justly secluded from the government1 and lived an exile for the space of ten years2 but1 by means of his malignant public resolution friends1 he was again1 by might1 though not of right1 restored1 without so much as his adherence sought to those oaths1 which he had formerly so solemnly sworn4 ,add to this the church's sinful silence1 through the influence of the backslidden resolution party therein1 so that1 at the convention of the pretended parliament1 anno #affa1 consisting mostly of persons of known disaffection to the true religion1 elected of purpose to serve the king's traitorous designs1 there was not so much as a protestation for civil or religious liberties and privileges offered thereunto2 but the vile person 7as be afterward fully declared himself7 was peaceably1 though illegally1 exalted4 #d4 ,as the presbytery find themselves in duty bound to testify against this most unhappy restoration of ,charles ,,ii1 so1 of necessary and just consequence1 they declare against the whole of his usurped and tyrannical administration--particularly against his blasphemous and heaven-daring ecclesiastical supremacy2 against the act rescissory1 declaring null and void the covenants1 presbyterian church government1 and all the laws made in favor of the true religion since the year #afch2 the wicked anniversary thanksgiving day1 in memory of the restoration2 the re-establishment of diocesan and ,erastian ,prelacy2 his publicly and ignominiously burning of our solemn covenants1 after pretending to nullify their obligation2 with all his cruelty1 tyranny1 oppression and bloodshed1 under color1 and without form1 of law1 exercised upon the ,lord's people1 during the whole of his reign4 #e4 ,they again testify against the treachery of these covenanted lands1 in their advancing 7contrary to our solemn covenants and all law and reason7 ,james1 duke of ,york1 a professed ,papist1 and avowed malignant to the throne of these realms4 ,as also1 they testify against his ,christ-dethroning supremacy1 and anti-christian indulgences and toleration1 flowing from that wicked fountain2 his horrid and cruel massacreing and murdering of the saints and servants of the ,most ,high2 with all his other wickedness briefly specified in the foregoing narrative4 ,upon the whole1 the presbytery declare and testify against all the affronts done unto the ,son of ,god1 and open attacks made upon his crown and kingdom2 all the different steps of apostasy from a work of reformation1 and all the hellish rage and cruelty exercised against the people of ,god during the foresaid period of persecution1 carried on by these two impious brothers4 ,,part ,,ii4 ,containing the grounds of the ,presbytery's testimony against the constitutions both civil and ecclesiastical at the late ,revolution1 anno #afhi3 as also1 against the gross ,erastianism and tyranny that has attended the administration both of church and state1 since that memorable period3 with various instances thereof1 c4 ,after the ,lord1 for the forementioned space of twenty-eight years1 had1 because of their manifold sins1 sorely plagued this church and nation with the grievous yoke of prelatical tyranny1 bloodshed1 oppression and fiery persecution1 and thereby had covered the daughter of ,zion with a cloud in his anger1 and cast down from heaven unto the earth the beauty of ,israel1 and had thrown down in his wrath the strong holds of the daughter of ,judah1 yea1 brought them down even to the ground2 he was pleased1 in his holy sovereignty1 to put a stop to that barbarous cruelty that was exercised upon his people1 at the last national ,revolution1 by the instrumentality of the prince and princess of ,orange2 which is the more remarkable1 in that those whom the ,lord employed as the rod of his anger1 to strike off that monstrous tyrant ,james duke of ,york from the ,british throne1 were natural branches sprung up from the same stock3 and this at a juncture when not only the church of ,christ was in the greatest danger of being totally extirpated1 but the whole land in hazard of being again overwhelmed with popish darkness and idolatry4 ,but although a very fit opportunity was then offered the nations for reviving the long buried work of a covenanted reformation both in church and state1 and re-establishing all the ordinances of ,god in purity1 according to their scriptural institution3 yet1 alas6 how deeply is it to be lamented1 that1 instead thereof1 the multitude of his tender mercies being forgotten1 there was a returning1 but not to the ,most ,high2 yea1 a turning aside like a deceitful bow2 so that1 in many respects1 our national guilt is now increased above what it was in former times3 wherefore1 as the presbytery desire with the utmost gratitude to acknowledge the divine goodness1 in giving a respite from the hot furnace of persecution2 so they likewise find themselves1 in duty to their princely ,master and his people1 obliged to testify and declare against foresaid revolution settlement1 in a variety of particulars1 with the many defections and backslidings flowing therefrom4 ,likeas they hereby do testify against the constitutions1 both civil and ecclesiastic1 at the ,revolution1 anno #afhi1 in those respects1 and for these reasons3 #a4 ,because that in the civil constitution1 these nations once united together in a scriptural and covenanted uniformity1 unmindful of their former establishment upon a divine footing1 wherein king and people were to be of one perfect religion1 and the supreme magistrate obliged by solemn oath to maintain and preserve the same inviolable1 did call and invite ,william and ,mary1 prince and princess of ,orange1 unto the possession of the royal power in these lands1 in a way contrary to the word of ,god1 as ,deut4 xvii1 #ae3 ,thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee whom the ,lord thy ,god shall choose3 one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee3 thou mayest not set a stranger over thee1 which is not thy brother4 #b ,sam4 xxiii1 #c3 ,the ,god of ,israel said1 the ,rock of ,israel spake to me1 ,he that ruleth over men1 must be just1 ruling in the fear of ,god4 ,in opposition to these clear precepts1 the nations did choose the foresaid persons to sway the civil scepter over them1 who were neither brethren by birth1 nor religious profession1 being educated in a church where ,erastianism prevails1 as appears from their ascribing such an extensive power to the civil magistrate1 as is inconsistent with the intrinsic power of the church4 ,accordingly1 by these principles1 said prince of ,orange did regulate his conduct1 in the assumption of his regal authority1 consenting to swear two distinct oaths1 whereby he obliged himself to preserve and maintain the two distinct and contrary religions 7or modes of religions worship71 ,presbytery and ,prelacy1 and so betrayed both to ,god and man his politic1 worldly views1 and proclaimed himself destitute of that truth and religious fear1 which is the essential character of every person who may warrantably be invested with supreme authority over the ,israel of ,god4 ,and as they wanted scriptural1 so likewise covenant qualifications1 namely1 known integrity1 approven fidelity1 constant affection1 and zeal to the cause and true church of ,god2 and therefore could not in a consistency with the covenanted constitution1 and fundamental laws of the crown1 be set up as king and queen of these covenanted lands4 ,again1 as during the persecuting period the nations generally were involved in the guilt of perjury and deep apostasy1 by the many sinful contradictory tests1 oaths and bonds then imposed2 so1 in a particular manner1 those who1 by virtue of their birth and dignity1 ought to have been the defenders of the nation's privileges1 both sacred and civil1 on the contrary1 as privy councilors to the two impious brothers in their rage against the ,lord and his ,anointed1 and as members of their iniquitous parliaments 7where perverting equity and justice1 they framed the most heaven-daring and abominable mischiefs into a law1 and then with the utmost cruelty prosecuted the same71 had many of them brought themselves under the fearful guilt of these atrocious crimes of murder1 perjury1 tyranny and oppression1 and thereby1 according to the law both of ,god and man1 not only forfeited their lives1 had the same been duly executed2 but also divested themselves of all just right and title to act the part of the nations' representatives1 in choosing and installing any in the office of supreme civil governor1 until at least they had given suitable evidence of their repentance4 ,yet such were the constituent members of that committee of estates1 and first parliament1 employed in the ,revolution settlement1 without so much as making any suitable public acknowledgment of their wickedness in the active hand the generality of them had in the former bloody persecution1 as appears from a comparative view of the lists of the members of parliament1 and particularly the duke of ,york's last parliament1 with act second of the acts and orders of the meeting of estates1 anno #afhi4 ,yea1 by viewing the lists of ,james ,,vii1 his privy council1 annexed by ,wodrow to the second volume of his history1 it is evident1 that a great number of the nobility alone1 members of that bloody council1 were also members of foresaid convention of estates1 the members of which convention 7seven bishops excepted7 were exactly the same with the members of the first parliament at the ,revolution4 ,for this1 compare second act of the meeting of estates1 with act first1 parliament first1 of ,william and ,mary4 ,by all which it is evident1 that from princes who had thus removed the bound1 and discovered no just remorse for their sins1 there was little ground left to expect a happy establishment of religion1 in restoring the flock of ,christ to the full possession of those valuable privileges and liberties wherewith he had made them free4 ,the character of the constituent members being considered1 the constitution itself1 and wherein it is inconsistent with our covenanted establishment1 and is therefore hereby testified against1 comes next to be considered4 ,although the declaration of the meeting of estates in this kingdom1 containing their claim of right1 comprehended much more of their civil liberties1 and formal rights of government1 than was enjoyed under the former monstrous tyranny1 yet by no means sufficiently provided for the legal establishment of our former happy reformed constitution1 which necessarily obliged the civil rulers to employ their power to maintain and defend1 not only the doctrine1 but also the ,presbyterian worship1 discipline and government1 as the only and unalterable form instituted by ,christ in his house4 ,whereas this craves the abolition of prelacy1 and the superiority of any office in the church above presbyters in ,scotland1 simply as it hath been a great and insupportable grievance and trouble to this nation1 and contrary to the inclinations of the generality of the people ever since the reformation from ,popery1 without regarding the divine right of ,presbytery1 and the contrariety of ,prelacy to scripture revelation4 ,in agreeableness to which demand1 when the first parliament met in ,scotland immediately after the ,revolution1 which began the day of ,april1 #afhi1 in ,act #c;d1 ,sess4 #ast1 entitled ,act abolishing ,prelacy1 they abolished ,prelacy for the foresaid reason1 and further declare1 that they will settle by law that church government in this kingdom1 which is most agreeable to the inclinations of the people4 ,accordingly1 in the second session of the same parliament1 ,act #eth1 ,june #gth1 #afij1 the parliament establishing the ,presbyterian church government and discipline1 as it had been ratified and established by the #adth ,act1 ,james ,,vi1 ,parl4 #abth1 anno #aeib1 reviving1 renewing and confirming the foresaid act of parliament1 in the whole heads thereof1 except that part of it relating to patronages1 afterward to be considered of4 ,likewise1 in the above mentioned act at the ,revolution1 the thirty-three chapters of the ,westminster ,confession of ,faith 7exclusive of the catechisms1 directory for worship1 and form of church government formerly publicly authorized1 and ,covenants ,national and ,solemn ,league7 were ratified and established by the parliament4 ,and the said ,confession being read in their presence1 was voted and approven by them1 as the public and avowed ,confession of this church1 without taking any notice of its scriptural authority4 ,and further1 in the same session of parliament1 by the royal power allenarly1 the first meeting of the general assembly of this church1 as above established1 was appointed to be held at ,edinburgh1 the third ,thursday of ,october following1 the same year1 #afij4 ,and by the same civil authority and foresaid act1 many of the churches in ,scotland were declared vacant4 #b4 ,the presbytery testify against the ecclesiastical constitution at the ,revolution2 particularly1 in regard1 #ast--,that the members composing the same were no less1 if not much more exceptionable1 than those of whom the state consisted2 the whole of them one way or other being justly chargeable with unfaithfulness to ,,christ1 and his covenanted cause1 by sinful and scandalous compliance with the public defections of the former times1 or actively countenancing the malignant apostasy of the lands1 which will appear evident1 by considering1 that the ,revolution ,church consisted of such office-bearers1 as had1 in contradiction to their most solemn covenant engagements1 fallen in with1 and approven of the public resolutions4 ,and these public resolutioners1 who had betrayed the ,,lord',s cause1 which they had in the most solemn manner sworn to maintain1 were1 without any public acknowledgement demanded or offered1 or adequate censure inflicted 7even1 after that the ,,lord had remarkably testified his displeasure against that leading step of defection1 by suffering these vipers1 which we thus took into our bosom1 to sting us almost to death7 for this their scandalous defection and perjury1 admitted and sustained members of the ,revolution ,church4 ,again1 the ,revolution assembly consisted of such ministers as had shamefully changed their holding of ,,christ1 and sinfully submitted1 in the exercise of their ministry1 to an exotic head1 ,charles ,,ii1 who had1 by virtue of his blasphemous supremacy1 and absolute power1 taken the power of the keys from ,christ's ministers1 and afterward returning only one of them 7viz43 the key of doctrine7 to such as accepted his anti-christian1 church-destroying1 and ,christ-dethroning indulgences1 attended with such sinful limitations and restrictions1 as were utterly inconsistent with ministerial freedom and faithfulness1 declaring the acceptors to be men-pleasers1 and so not the servants of ,christ 7of which above74 ,of this stamp were the most of them1 who1 without any public acknowledgment of that horrid affront they had put upon the church's true ,head1 dared to constitute and act as the supreme judicatory of the church of ,christ1 anno #afij4 ,again1 the foresaid assembly was almost wholly formed of such as had petitioned for1 accepted of1 and pretended to return a ,god-mocking letter of thanks for that blasphemous unbounded toleration1 which that popish tyrant1 the duke of ,york 7as is noticed formerly71 granted1 with a special view to reintroduce abjured popery2 and therefore while it extended its protection to every heresy1 did exclude the pure preaching of the gospel in the fields2 which toleration 7according to ,wodrow7 was joyfully embraced by all the ,presbyterian ministers in ,scotland1 the honored ,mr4 ,renwick only excepted1 who faithfully protested against the same4 ,but further1 the ,revolution assembly did partly consist of such members as1 contrary to our solemn covenants1 had their consciences dreadfully polluted1 by consenting unto1 subscribing1 and swearing some one or other of the sinful wicked oaths1 tests and bonds1 tyrannically imposed in the persecuting period1 or by persuading others to take them1 and declining to give warning of the danger of them1 or by approving the warrantableness of giving security to the bloody council1 not to exercise their ministry1 but according to their pleasure4 ,moreover1 they were all1 generally1 manifestly guilty of the sin of carrying on and maintaining schism and defection from the covenanted church of ,,christ in ,scotland4 ,as also 7which from the history of these times is evident71 the ruling elders in that assembly1 being generally noblemen1 gentlemen1 and burgesses1 were mostly such as had an active hand in the tyranny and persecution that preceded1 and in one respect or other1 were stained with the blood of the martyrs of ,jesus4 ,thus1 that assembly was packed up1 chiefly1 of such blacked compilers1 as1 one way or other1 were deeply involved in the apostasy1 bloodshed and cruelty of the preceding period1 yet had not broke off their iniquities1 by a public confession of these crying sins1 before that meeting2 nor can it be found1 that any adequate censure was inflicted on any of them for the same4 ,therefore1 the presbytery testify against the ,revolution church1 as consisting mostly of such scandalous schismatical members1 as could not1 in a consistency with the scriptural rule1 and laudable acts of this reformed church1 have been admitted to church privileges1 far less to bear office in the house of ,god2 until1 at least1 they had been duly purged from their aggravated scandals1 and given evident signs of a real repentance1 according to the ,word of ,god1 #b ,chron4 xxx1 #c3 ,for they could not keep the passover at that time1 because the priests had not sanctified themselves sufficiently4 ,and ,ezek4 xliv1 #aj3 ,and the ,levites that are gone away far from me1 when ,israel went astray1 which went astray away from me after their idols1 they shall even bear their iniquity2 v4 #ac3 ,and they shall not come near unto me1 to do the office of a priest unto me1 nor to come near to any of my holy things1 in the most holy place2 but they shall bear their shame1 and their abominations which they have committed4 ,next1 the presbytery declare and testify against the ,revolution church1 because plainly ,erastian1 and utterly inconsistent with the covenanted constitution of the reformed church of ,scotland1 anno #afdh3 the truth of which charge will appear obvious1 from considering the act of parliament1 on which the civil power settled the constitution of the ,revolution church1 viz41 ,act #aad1 ,james ,,vi1 ,parl4 #abth2 where1 inter alia1 it is expressly declared1 ,that it shall be lawful to the kirk ministers1 every year at least1 and oftener1 pro re nata1 as occasion and necessity sall require1 to hald and keepe general assemblies1 providing that the king's majesty1 or his commissioner with them1 to be appointed be his highness to be present at ilk general assembly1 before the dissolving thereof1 nominate and appoynt time and place1 quhen and quhair the next general assemblie sall be halden3 and in case neither his majesty nor his said commissioner beis present for the time1 in that town1 quhair the said general assemblie beis halden1 then1 and in that case1 it shall be lesum for the said general assembly be themselves1 to nominate and appoint time and place1 quhair the next general assembly of the kirk sall be keeped and halden1 as they have been in use to do these times by-past4 ,here1 in this act1 a manifest invasion and traitorous attack is made upon the headship and supremacy of ,christ1 as a ,son in1 and over his own house4 ,he who is ,god's annotated ,king in ,zion1 and sits on the throne of his holiness1 is hereby robbed of his crown rights2 the intrinsic power1 the spiritual liberty and freedom1 granted by ,christ to his church1 is encroached upon4 ,it is a received opinion among all true ,presbyterians1 that the church hath an intrinsic power to meet in the courts of ,christ's house1 from the lowest to the highest1 by virtue of the power committed to her by the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 without dependence on the civil power4 ,this is agreeable to scripture1 ,matth4 xvi1 #ai1 and xviii1 #ah1 #ai1 where the apostles receive the keys immediately from the hands of ,christ their ,lord and ,master4 ,and as one principal part of that trust ,christ has committed to his church1 this has been the constant plea of the reforming and reformed ,presbyterian church of ,scotland4 ,let us hear what that renowned and faithful minister1 and venerable confessor for ,christ1 the ,rev4 ,mr4 ,john ,welsh1 says to this particular1 in his letter to the ,countess of ,wigton from ,blackness1 #afjf1 when a prisoner for this same truth4 ,having asserted the independence of the church1 the spiritual kingdom of ,christ1 upon any earthly monarch1 and her freedom to meet and judge of all her affairs2 he adds1 ,these two points1 #ast1 that ,christ is ,head of his church2 #b;d1 that she is free in her government from all other jurisdictions1 except ,christ's4 ,these two points1 ,i say1 are the special causes of our imprisonment1 being now convicted as traitors for maintaining thereof4 ,we have been ever waiting with joyfulness to give the last testimony of our blood in confirmation thereof1 if it should please our ,god to be so favorable as to honor us with that dignity4 ,yea1 ,i do affirm1 that these two points above written1 and all other things that do belong to ,christ's crown1 scepter and kingdom1 are not subject1 nor cannot be1 to any other authority1 but to his own altogether3 so that ,i would be glad to be offered up as a sacrifice for so glorious a truth4 ,so far he4 ,but now this assembly of treacherous men1 by settling themselves upon such a constitution have openly given up this scriptural truth and ,presbyterian principle handed down to us1 sealed with the sufferings and dearest blood of the faithful ,confessors and ,martyrs of ,christ1 and have consented that it is unlawful for the office-bearers in the ,lord's house to exert their proper power in calling and appointing general assemblies1 however loudly the necessity of the church may call for them1 unless the king authorize their diet of meeting1 which he may1 or may not do1 according to his pleasure4 ,again1 it is evident1 that the revolution church is constituted in the same ,erastian manner with the late ,prelacy in ,scotland4 ,for proof of which1 observe1 that as ,prelacy was never ecclesiastically asserted to be of divine authority1 neither has ,presbytery1 by any explicit and formal act of ,assembly1 at or since the revolution4 ,as the prelates' high ecclesiastical court was called1 adjourned and dissolved1 in the king's name1 so likewise are the assemblies of the ,revolution ,church4 ,as the ,episcopalians owned the king1 in the exercise of his ,erastian supremacy over them1 so the ,revolution ,church1 instead of opposing1 did take up her standing under the covert of that anti-christian supremacy1 and has never since declined the exercise thereof4 ,and1 as the civil power prescribed limits unto1 and at pleasure altered1 the prelatic church1 so this church has accepted of a formula1 prescribed by the civil power1 requiring that all the ordinances within the same be performed by the ministers thereof1 as they were then allowed them1 or should thereafter be declared by their authority1 as ,act #bc;d1 ,sess4 #dth1 ,parl4 #ast1 #afic1 expressly bears4 ,by what is said above1 it may appear1 that this church is ,erastian in her constitution4 ,but it is further to be observed1 that the present constitution is no less inconsistent with the scriptural and covenanted constitution of the church of ,scotland1 in regard that the retrograde constitution1 to which the church fled back1 and on which she was settled at the revolution1 was but an infant state of the church1 lately after her first reformation from ,popery1 far inferior to her advanced state betwixt #afch and #afdi inclusive4 ,it was before the church had shaken off the intolerable yokes of ,erastian supremacy and patronages2 before she had ecclesiastically asserted1 and practically maintained1 her spiritual and scriptural claim of right1 namely1 the divine right of presbytery1 and intrinsic power of the church1 the two special gems of ,christ's crown1 as ,king on his holy hill of ,zion2 before the explanation of the national covenant1 as condemning episcopacy1 the five articles of ,perth1 the civil power of churchmen2 before the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant was entered into2 before the ,westminster ,confession of ,faith1 the ,catechisms1 larger and shorter1 the ,directory for worship1 ,form of ,presbyterian church government and ordination of ministers1 were composed2 and before the acts of church and state1 for purging judicatories1 ecclesiastical and civil1 and armies from persons disaffected to the cause and work of ,god1 were made2 and all these valuable pieces of reformation ratified with the full and ample sanction of the supreme civil authority1 by the king's majesty and honorable estates of parliament1 as parts of the covenanted uniformity in religion1 betwixt the churches of ,christ in ,scotland1 ,england and ,ireland4 ,and therefore1 this revolution constitution amounts to a shameful disregarding--yea1 disclaiming and burying--much 7if not all7 of the reformation attained to in that memorable period1 and is a virtual homologation and allowance of the iniquitous laws at the restoration1 anno #affa1 condemning our glorious reformation and sacred covenants as rebellion2 and is such an aggravated step of defection and apostasy1 as too clearly discovers this church to be fixed upon a different footing1 and to be called by another name1 than the genuine offspring of the true covenanted church of ,christ in ,scotland4 ,besides what has been already noticed1 respecting the sinfulness both of the members constituent1 and the constitutions at the revolution1 it is to be further observed1 as just matter of lamentation1 that1 at this period1 when such a noble opportunity was offered1 no suitable endeavors were made for reviving the covenanted cause and interest of our ,,redeemer2 no care taken that the city of the ,lord should be built upon her own heap1 and the palace remain after the manner thereof2 but1 on the contrary1 a religion was then established1 not only exceedingly far short of1 but in many particulars very inconsistent with1 and destructive of1 that blessed uniformity in religion1 once the glory of these now degenerate isles4 ,the presbytery1 therefore1 in the next place1 do testify against the settlement of religion made at the revolution1 and that in these particulars following3 #a4 ,instead of abolishing ,prelacy in ,england and ,ireland1 as it had been abjured in the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 and stands condemned by the word of ,god1 and fundamental laws of the nations1 conform to the divine law1 it was then1 with all its popish ceremonies1 anew secured1 confirmed and established1 in both these kingdoms1 as the true religion1 according to the word of ,god1 to be publicly professed by all the people2 and the supreme civil magistrate solemnly sworn1 at his inauguration1 both that he himself shall be of the ,episcopal communion1 and that he shall maintain inviolably the settlement of the church of ,england1 in the kingdoms of ,england and ,ireland1 and territories thereunto belonging4 ,thus the revolution has ratified the impious overthrow1 and ignominious burial1 of the covenanted reformation in these two kingdoms1 that was made in the persecuting period1 and has fixed a legal bar in the way of their reformation1 in agreeableness to the sacred oath the three nations brought themselves under to ,god ,almighty4 #b4 ,as to the settlement of religion in ,scotland1 the presbytery testify against it3 because it was a settlement1 which1 instead of homologating and reviving the covenanted reformation between #afch and #afej1 in profession and principle1 left the same buried under the infamous act rescissory1 which did1 at one blow1 rescind and annul the whole of the reformation1 and authority establishing the same1 by making a retrograde motion1 as far back as #aeib1 without ever coming one step forward since that time1 and herein acted most contrary to the practice of our honored reformers1 who always used to begin where former reformations stopped1 and after having removed what obstructed the work of reformation1 went forward in building and beautifying the house of the ,lord4 ,that this backward settlement at the revolution1 was a glaring relinquishment of many of our valuable and happy attainments1 in the second and most advanced reformation 7as said is71 and consequently1 an open apostasy and revolt from the covenanted constitution of the church of ,scotland1 is sufficiently evident1 from the foresaid act of settlement #afij2 where 7after having allowed of the ,westminster confession7 they further add1 ,that they do establish1 ratify and confirm1 the ,presbyterian church government and discipline1 ratified and established by the #aadth ,act1 ,james ,,vi1 ,parl4 #abth1 anno #aeib4 ,so that this settlement includes nothing more of the covenanted uniformity in these lands1 than only the thirty-three articles of the ,confession of ,faith1 wanting the scripture proofs4 ,again1 that the ,revolution settlement of religion did not abolish the act rescissory1 nor ratify and revive any act1 between #afch and #afej1 authorizing and establishing the work of reformation1 is clear from the same act3 wherein1 after abolishing some acts anent the late prelacy in ,scotland1 they declare3 that these acts are abolished1 so far allenarly1 as the said acts1 and others1 generally and particularly above mentioned1 are contrary or prejudicial to1 inconsistent with1 or derogatory from1 the ,protestant religion1 or ,presbyterian church government1 now established4 ,where observe1 that this general clause is restricted to acts and laws1 in so far only1 as they were contrary to the religion settled in this act2 and therefore1 as this act includes no part of the covenanted reformation between #afch and #afdi1 so this rescissory clause abolishes laws1 not as against foresaid reformation1 but only in so far as they strike against the revolution settlement1 which the act rescissory could not do4 ,again1 in another clause of the same act1 it is added3 ,therefore1 their majesties do hereby revive and ratify1 and perpetually confirm1 all laws1 statutes and acts of parliament1 made against ,popery and ,papists4 ,the only reason that can be given for the revival of laws1 not against ,prelacy1 but ,popery1 when abolishing ,prelacy1 is1 that the parliament1 excluding the covenanted reformation from this settlement of religion1 resolved to let the whole of it lie buried under the act rescissory4 ,for as1 in reality1 there were no laws made expressly against ,prelacy before #aeib1 but against ,popery and ,papists2 so1 had they said1 laws against prelacy and prelates1 they thereby would have revived some of the laws made by the reforming parliaments1 between #afdj and #afej2 wherein bishops and all other prelates1 the civil places and power of kirkmen1 c41 are expressly condemned4 ,again1 in the foresaid act1 they confirm all the article of the #aadth ,act1 #aeib1 except the part of it anent patronages1 which is to be afterward considered4 ,now1 had the revolution parliament regarded the reforming laws to have been revived1 and so the act rescissory to be rescinded1 by their ,act #eth1 #afij1 they would not have left this particular to be again considered of1 seeing patronages were entirely abolished by an act of parliament #afdi2 but1 having the ball at their foot1 they now acted as would best suit with their political and worldly views4 ,once more observe1 that when the revolution parliament ratified the act #aeib1 they take no notice of its having been done before1 by a preceding parliament in #afdi4 ,all which plainly says1 that the reforming laws and authority of the parliaments by which they were made1 are not regarded as now in force4 ,to conclude this particular1 if the settlement of religion1 made in #afij1 had revived and ratified the authority of our reforming parliaments1 and laws made by them2 then1 as these obliged the king to swear the covenants before his coronation1 and all ranks to swear them1 and obliged to root out malignancy1 sectarianism1 c41 and to promote uniformity in doctrine1 worship1 discipline and government1 in the three nations1 so the revolution settlement would have obliged all to the practice of the same duties1 and that1 before ever king1 or any under him1 could have been admitted to any trust2 while all that would not comply therewith1 would have been held as enemies1 not only to religion1 but to their king and country also1 as was the case when reformation flourished4 ,but1 as the very reverse of this was authorized and practised at the revolution1 it convincingly discovers1 that the settlement of religion1 made in #afij1 left the whole of the reformation attained to1 ratified and established by solemn oaths and civil laws between #afdj and #afdi1 buried under that scandalous and wicked act rescissory1 framed by that tyrant1 ,charles ,,ii1 after his restoration4 ,nor is there to be found1 in all the acts1 petitions1 supplications and addresses1 made by the assemblies at or since the revolution1 any thing importing a desire to have that blasphemous act rescinded1 which stands in full force1 to the perpetual infamy and disgrace of the revolution settlement of religion1 so much gloried in1 by the greatest part1 as happily established4 #b4 ,the presbytery testify against the ,revolution settlement of religion1 not only as including avowed apostasy from the covenanted constitution of the reformed church of ,scotland1 and a traitorous giving up of the interests and rights of ,christ1 our ,lord and ,,redeemer1 in these1 and especially in this land2 but also1 as it is an ,erastian settlement1 which will appear1 by considering #ast4 ,the scriptural method then taken1 in establishing religion3 instead of setting the church foremost in the work of the ,lord1 and the state coming after1 and ratifying by their civil sanction what the church had done2 the ,revolution parliament inverted this beautiful order1 both in abolishing ,prelacy1 settling ,presbytery1 and ratifying the ,confession of ,faith1 as the standard of doctrine to this church2 #b;d1 ,in abolishing ,prelacy1 as it was not at the desire of the church1 but of the estates of ,scotland1 so the parliament did it in an ,erastian manner1 without consulting the church1 or regarding that it had been abolished by the church1 anno #afch1 and by the state1 #afdj1 in confirmation of what the church had done4 ,thus1 ,act #c;d1 #afhi1 'tis said1 ,the king and queen's majesties with the estates of parliament1 do hereby abolish ,prelacy4 ,again1 when establishing presbytery1 ,act #eth1 #afij1 they act in the same ,erastian manner1 whereby the order of the house of ,god was inverted in the matter of government2 in regard that the settlement of the government of the church in the first instance1 properly belongs to an ecclesiastical judicatory1 met and constituted in the name of the ,lord ,jesus ,christ2 and it is afterward the duty of the state to give the sanction of their authority to the same4 ,this ,erastianism further appears in the parliament's conduct with respect unto the ,confession of ,faith3 see ,act #eth1 ,sess4 #b;d1 ,parl4 #ast1 wherein thus they express themselves3 ,likeas they1 by these presents1 ratify and establish the ,confession of ,faith1 now read in their presence1 and voted and approven by them1 as the public and avowed confession of this church4 ,hence it is obvious1 that the parliament1 by sustaining themselves proper judges of doctrine1 encroached upon the intrinsic power of the church3 they read1 voted1 and approved the ,confession of ,faith1 without ever referring to1 or regarding the act of the general assembly #afdg1 or any other act of reforming assemblies1 whereby that confession was formerly made ours1 or even so much as calling an assembly to vote and approve that confession of new4 ,that the above conduct of the state1 without regarding the church in her assemblies1 either past or future1 is gross ,erastianism1 and what does not belong1 at first instance1 to the civil magistrate1 but to the church representative1 to whom the ,lord has committed the management of the affairs of his spiritual kingdom1 may appear from these few sacred texts1 besides many others1 namely1 ,numb4 i1 #ej1 #ea3 ,but thou shalt appoint the ,levites over the tabernacle of testimony1 and over all the vessels thereof1 and over all the things that belong to it3 they shall bear the tabernacle and all the vessels thereof1 and they shall minister unto it1 and shall encamp round about the tabernacle2 and when the tabernacle setteth forward1 the ,levites shall take it down1 and when the tabernacle is to be pitched1 the ,levites shall set it up1 and the stranger that cometh nigh shall be put to death4 ,see also chapters iii1 and iv1 throughout2 also ,deut4 xxxiii1 #h1 #aj2 #a ,chron4 xv1 #b2 #b ,chron4 xix1 #aa2 ,ezra x1 #d4 ,so ,david1 when he had felt the anger of the ,lord1 for not observing his commandments in this particular1 says1 #a ,chron4 xv1 #ab1 #ac1 to the ,levites1 ,sanctify yourselves that ye may bring up the ark of the ,lord ,god of ,israel4 ,for because ye did it not at the first1 the ,lord our ,god made a breach upon us1 for that we sought him not after the due order4 ,likewise ,hezekiah1 a reforming king1 did not himself1 at first instance1 set about reforming and purging the house of ,god2 but having called together the priests and ,levites1 says to them1 #b ,chron4 xxix1 #e3 ,sanctify yourselves and sanctify the house of the ,lord ,god of your fathers1 and carry forth the filthiness out of the holy place2 compared with ver4 #aa2 ,mal4 ii1 #g2 ,matth4 xvi1 #ai4 ,i will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven4 ,and xxviii1 #ah1 #ai1 #bj3 ,all power is given unto me1 go ye therefore and teach all nations1 teaching them to observe all things whatsoever ,i have commanded you4 ,from all which it may safely be inferred1 that as the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 the ,king and ,lawgiver of his church1 has committed all the power of church matters1 whether respecting the doctrine or government thereof1 to church officers1 as the first1 proper receptacles thereof2 so1 for civil rulers1 at first instance1 by their own authority1 to make alterations in the government of the church1 and to settle and emit a standard of doctrine to the church1 is a manifest usurpation of ecclesiastical authority1 and tyrannical encroachment upon the ministerial office4 ,it needs only to be added1 that this ,revolution conduct stands condemned by the ,confession of ,faith itself1 in express terms 7as well as in the holy scriptures71 chap4 xxiii1 sect4 #c1 ,the civil magistrate may not assume to himself the administration of the word or the keys4 ,and also1 by the beautiful practice of our reformers1 betwixt #afch and #afdi1 who observed the scriptural order1 the church always going foremost1 in all the several pieces of reformation attained to1 and then the state coming after1 by exerting their authority1 in ratification and defense of the church's acts and deeds1 in behalf of reformation4 #c4 ,the ,erastianism of this settlement of religion1 appears plain from the act of parliament #aeib1 noticed above1 upon which the ,revolution parliament did found it1 as in ,act #eth1 ,sess4 #b1 #afij1 by which the forementioned act #aeib1 is ratified1 revived1 renewed and confirmed1 in all the heads thereof1 patronage excepted4 ,now1 in regard that act #aeib contains an invasion upon the headship of ,christ1 and intrinsic power of the church1 and ascribes an ,erastian power to the civil magistrate over the church1 making it unlawful for the church to convocate her superior judicatories1 but in dependence upon the king for his licence and authority2 and in regard the ,revolution parliament did revive and renew this clause in foresaid act #aeib1 as well as other heads thereof1 it must needs follow1 that this settlement of religion cannot be freed of the charge of ,erastianism4 ,nor is it very strange that statesmen1 who had been educated in the principles of ,erastianism1 should be fond of reviving an act that robbed ,christ of his crown rights1 and the church of her spiritual liberty2 but most surprising1 that professed ,presbyterian ministers should so greedily embrace and approve of ,erastianism1 as a valuable and glorious deliverance to the church of ,christ6 ,in agreeableness to this ,erastian article of the above act the parliament1 in their act #afij1 indicted and appointed the first general assembly1 as a specimen of their ,erastian power over their newly constituted church2 and it has ever since been the practice of the sovereign1 to call1 dissolve and adjourn her assemblies at his pleasure1 and sometimes to an indefinite time4 ,it is further observable1 that the king's commission to his representative in assembly1 runs in a style that evidently discovers1 that he looks upon the assembly's power and right of constitution as subordinate to him4 ,thus it begins1 ,seeing by our decree that an assembly is to meet1 c4 ,yet notwithstanding of this1 the assembly #afij 7nor any after them1 so far as was ever known to the world7 did not by any one formal act and statue expressly condemn ,erastianism1 and explicitly assert the alone headship of ,christ1 and the intrinsic1 independent power of the church1 in opposition to these encroachments made thereupon1 and therefore may be justly construed consenters thereto4 ,to conclude this particular1 of the ,erastianism of the present settlement of religion1 it may be observed that although the ,revolution parliament1 from political views1 did by ,act #ast1 ,sess4 #b;d1 rescind the first act of the second parliament of ,charles ,,ii4 entitled ,act asserting his majesty's supremacy over all persons and in all causes ecclesiastical2 yet1 from what is above hinted1 it may be inferred1 that the ,revolution state has still preserved the very soul and substance of that blasphemous supremacy 7though possibly they may have transferred it from the person of the king1 abstractly considered1 and lodged it in the hand of the king and parliament conjunctly1 as the more proper subject thereof73 for1 in the words of ,mr4 ,john ,burnet1 in his testimony against the indulgence1 quoted by ,mr4 ,brown in his history of the indulgence1 ,to settle1 enact and emit constitutions1 acts and orders1 concerning matters1 meetings and persons ecclesiastical1 according to royal pleasure 7and parliamentary is much the same71 is the very substance and definition of his majesty's supremacy1 as it is explained by his estates of parliament4 ,but the ,revolution act of parliament settling religion1 is just to settle1 enact and emit such constitutions1 acts and orders concerning matters1 meetings and persons ecclesiastical1 according to parliamentary1 instead of mere royal pleasure3 and therefore the act authorizing the ,revolution settlement of religion1 is the very substance and definition of a royal parliamentary supremacy4 ,the truth of this will further appear by the sequel4 #d4 ,the presbytery testify against the ,revolution constitution and settlement of religion1 as it is not a religious1 but a mere civil and political one2 not built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets1 ,jesus ,christ himself being the chief corner stone2 but upon the fluctuating inclinations of the people1 as the formal foundation thereof4 ,for proof of which1 consider the acts of parliament relative to the abolition of ,prelacy1 and the establishment of presbytery4 ,in consequence of an article of the claim of right made by the estates of ,scotland1 the ,act #c;d1 ,sess4 #ast1 ,parl4 #afhi1 declares1 ,that whereas the estates of this kingdom1 in their claim of right1 declared that ,prelacy1 and the superiority of any office in the church above presbyters1 is and hath been a great and insupportable grievance to this nation1 and contrary to the inclinations of the generality of the people ever since the reformation1 they having been reformed from ,popery by presbyters1 and therefore to be abolished3 our sovereign lord and lady1 with advice and consent of the estates of parliament1 do hereby abolish ,prelacy1 and all superiority of any office in the church in this kingdom above presbyters2 and do declare1 that they1 with advice aforesaid1 will settle by law that church government in this kingdom1 which is most agreeable to the inclinations of the people4 ,agreeable to this1 one of king ,william's instructions to the parliament #afij1 is1 ,you are to pass an act establishing that church government which is most agreeable to the inclinations of the people4 ,accordingly we have the ,act #eth1 ,sess4 #b;d1 #afij1 settling ,presbyterian church-government in the same form1 and on the same footing4 ,and so much king ,william1 who1 doubtless1 was perfectly acquainted with the true intent and meaning of that act1 declares in his letter to the assembly indicted by him that same year4 ,from all which 7without noticing the ,erastian form of these acts1 c47 it may be observed1 that there is somewhat done that is materially good2 but then there is nothing importing the contrariety of ,prelacy to the scriptures of truth1 nor the divine right of ,presbyterian church government1 so that the whole of this settlement is purely political1 done for the pleasure of the good subjects of ,scotland3 for1 #ast1 the only reason why ,prelacy is complained of and abolished1 is1 because it was grievous and contrary to the inclinations of the generality of the people4 ,it is not so much as declared contrary to law1 though well known that it was condemned by many of the reforming laws2 far less is it declared contrary to the word of ,god1 and reformation principles founded thereupon4 ,neither is it said to be a grievance to the nations1 though it is manifest1 by the nations entering into a solemn covenant to extirpate it1 that it was an insupportable burden to all the three4 ,and the great reason assigned for the people's dissatisfaction to ,prelacy1 is antiquity1 they having been reformed from ,popery by presbyters1 as if our reformers had only contended for a church government merely human2 whereas they strenuously maintained the divine right of presbytery1 and condemned ,prelacy as contrary to the word of ,god4 ,this reason would be equally strong against presbytery1 on supposition that prelates had got the start of presbyters in the reformation from ,popery4 ,again1 #b;d1 upon the same1 and no better ground1 was ,presbytery established1 namely1 because it was more agreeable to the inclinations of the people1 and as it was of a more ancient standing in ,scotland than ,prelacy4 ,further1 that the divine right of presbytery is not acknowledged in this settlement1 appears from the express words of the act itself1 wherein it is designated1 the only government of ,christ's church in the nation2 not the only government of ,christ's church laid down in the word of ,god1 received and sworn to by all the three nations1 ratified by both civil and ecclesiastical authority4 ,a clear evidence1 that church government was regarded as ambulatory only1 and what might be altered at pleasure4 ,hence1 while the king was settling presbytery in ,scotland1 he was also maintaining1 as bound by oath1 ,prelacy in ,england1 c4 ,and so ,presbytery1 for peace's sake1 as most agreeable to the inclinations of the people1 was settled in ,scotland as the government of ,christ's church there4 ,thus1 there is a settlement of religion1 and yet not one line of scripture authority1 or reformation principles legible therein3 and1 as one said 7though a strenuous defender of the settlement71 ,the glory of that church is at a low pass1 which hangs upon the nail of legal securities by kings and parliaments1 instead of the nail which ,god has fastened in a sure place2 which1 alas6 is the case with the church of ,scotland at this day4 ,it is true1 that the parliament call their settlement1 ,agreeable to ,god's word2 but it is as true1 that1 from their conduct toward both 7abolishing ,prelacy1 and establishing ,presbytery1 from these political motives above mentioned71 it is abundantly plain1 that they believed neither of them to be formally and specifically agreeable to1 and founded upon the word of ,god2 but that they regarded all forms of church government as indifferent1 and thought themselves at liberty to pick and choose such a particular form as best suited the humors and inclinations of the people1 and their own worldly advantage4 ,accordingly1 we find the parliament #afhi1 appointing a committee to receive all the forms of government that should be brought before them1 to examine them for this purpose1 and then report their opinions of them to the house4 ,that the parliament at this time1 or the king and parliament conjunctly1 acted from the above latitudinarian principle1 is further evident1 from their establishing and consenting to the establishment of these two different and opposite forms of church government1 ,presbytery in ,scotland1 and ,prelacy in ,england and ,ireland1 and both of them considered as agreeable to the word of ,god1 and the only government of ,christ's church in the several kingdoms1 where they were espoused2 which1 as it is self-contradictory and absurd1 so it is impossible they could ever have done this1 if they had believed the divine right of either of them4 ,and finally1 by this conduct of theirs1 the state declared their approbation thereof1 and resolution to copy after the #afth ,act1 ,sess4 #b;d ,parl4 #ast of ,charles ,,ii 7yet in force71 which ascribes an ,erastian power to the king1 of settling church government as he shall think proper4 ,by all which it appears quite inconsistent with the ,revolution settlement1 to consider church power in any other light1 than as subordinate to the power of the state4 ,and yet with this political and ,erastian settlement of religion1 the ,revolution ,church have declared themselves satisfied2 they have not condemned ,episcopacy1 as contrary to the word of ,god1 nor positively asserted the divine right of ,presbytery1 and disclaimed the claim of right and act of settlement1 as their right of constitution2 but1 on the contrary1 approved of both1 as appears from the commission's act1 #agji1 and their address to the parliament1 #agaa1 both homologated by the succeeding assemblies4 ,whereby they declare1 that they have dropped a most material part of the testimony of the reformed church of ,scotland1 and are not faithful to the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 in maintaining the rights of his crown and kingdom4 ,from the whole1 it may too justly be concluded concerning the ,revolution settlement of religion1 what the prophet ,hosea declares of the calf of ,samaria1 ,hos4 viii1 #f3 ,for from ,israel was it also1 the workman made it1 therefore it is not ,god2 the calf of ,samaria shall be broken in pieces4 ,it is not a divine institution founded upon the word of ,god1 and regulated by his revealed law2 but a human invention1 owing its original in both kingdoms to the inclinations of the people1 and governed by laws opposite to the laws of ,christ in the word4 ,hence we have the idolatrous institutions of ,prelacy1 established in the one nation1 and ,erastianism1 under the specious pretext of ,presbytery1 in the other2 and both under an exotic head of ecclesiastical government4 ,from what is said above1 respecting the ,revolution constitutions1 and settlement of religion in the nations1 it will appear1 that the same are opposite to the word of ,god1 and covenanted constitutions of both church and state1 and to the reforming laws1 between #afch and #afej1 ratifying and securing the doctrine1 worship1 discipline1 and government of the church1 and all divine ordinances1 sacred and civil1 according to scripture revelation2 and therefore cannot be acknowledged as lawful1 by any that make the law of ,god their rule1 and desire to go out by the footsteps of the flock of ,christ4 ,the ,presbytery proceed now to consider the administration since the late ,revolution1 as standing in immediate connection with the forementioned constitutions and settlement3 only1 in the entry1 it may be observed1 that as the mal-administrations1 civil and ecclesiastical1 are increased to almost an innumerable multitude1 so that it would be next to an impossibility to reckon them all2 the ,presbytery propose only to observe so many of the most remarkable instances1 as shall be sufficient to justify a condemnation of the present course of the nations1 although the constitutions could not1 be excepted against as sinful4 ,and1 #a4 ,the ,presbytery declare and testify against the gross ,erastianism that has attended the administrations of both church and state1 since the ,revolution4 ,as the constitutions of both 7above noticed7 were ,erastian and anti-scriptural1 so their conduct ever since has been agreeable thereto1 tending evidently to discover that1 while the state is robbing out ,redeemer of his crown1 and his church of her liberties1 this church1 instead of testifying against1 gives consent to these impieties4 ,particularly1 #a1 as at the forementioned period1 so ever since1 the king has continued1 by his own authority1 to call1 dissolve1 and adjourn the national assemblies of this church4 ,the first ,revolution ,assembly was held1 by virtue of an ,erastian indictment1 and by the same power dissolved4 ,the nest was1 by royal authority1 appointed to be at ,edinburgh #afia1 but by the same power1 adjourned to #afib1 and then dissolved1 without passing any act2 and though again indicted to meet #afic1 yet was not allowed to sit until ,march #afid1 near a year after the parliament had made an humble address to the sovereign for granting that privilege4 ,but it would be endless to attempt an enumeration of all the instances of the exercise of ,erastianism in this particular1 which is annually renewed4 ,how often1 alas6 have the assemblies been prorogued1 raised1 and dissolved1 by magistratical authority1 and sometimes without nomination of another diet8 ,how frequently also1 have they been restricted in their proceedings1 and prelimited as to members1 and matters to be treated of1 and discussed therein2 depriving some members of their liberty to sit and act as members1 though regularly chosen1 merely1 because such had not taken the oaths appointed by law8 ,all which exercise of ,erastian supremacy natively results from the parliamentary settlement #afij4 ,and when no adequate testimony was ever given by the church against such ,erastian usurpations1 but they are still crouched under and complied with1 it may justly be constructed a tame subjection and woful consent to this supremacy4 ,that this is no forced inference from the continued practice of this church1 appears from this 7besides other evidences that might be adduced71 viz41 ,that as the ,revolution parliament1 when ratifying the ,confession of ,faith1 entirely left out the act of ,assembly #afdg1 approving and partly explaining the same 7wherein these remarkable words are1 ,it is further declared1 that the ,assembly understands some parts of the second article of the #cast chapter1 only of kirks not settled or constituted in point of government7 as being inconsistent with the ,erastian impositions of the magistrate4 ,so this church1 when they cause intrants into the ministry subscribe the ,confession1 do not oblige them to subscribe it with this explanatory act 7which does by no means admit of a privative power in the magistrate1 destructive of the church's intrinsic power71 but they only do it as the parliament ratified it4 #b4 ,another instance of ,erastianism practiced by both church and state1 is1 that when the king and parliament did bind down episcopal curates upon congregations1 forbidding church judicatories the exercise of discipline upon the impenitent1 and enjoining the ,assembly to admit such1 without any evidence of grief or sorrow for their former apostasy1 upon their swearing the oath of allegiance1 and subscribing a formula1 homologating the ,revolution settlement1 substituted in the room of the covenants2 the church approved of this settlement1 and protection granted by the civil powers to such curates all their lifetime in their churches and benefices1 who yet were not brought under any obligation to subject themselves to the government and discipline of the church4 ,the truth of this is manifest1 from sundry of king ,william's letters to the ,assemblies1 together with after acts of parliament1 relative thereto4 ,in his letter1 dated ,february #acth1 #afij1 to the commission of the ,assembly1 he says1 ,whereas there has been humble application made to us by several ministers1 for themselves and others1 who lately served under episcopacy2 we have thought good to signify our pleasure to you1 that you make no distinction of men1 otherwise well qualified for the ministry1 though they have formerly conformed to the law1 introducing ,episcopacy1 and that ye give them no disturbance or vexation for that cause1 or for that head3 and it is our pleasure1 that1 until we give our further directions1 you proceed to no more process1 or any other business4 ,in another letter1 dated ,june #aeth1 #afia1 he says1 ,we are well pleased with what you write1 to unite with such of the clergy1 who have served under ,episcopacy2 and that you are sufficiently instructed by the ,general ,assembly to receive them2 from all which1 we do expect a speedy and happy success1 that there shall be so great a progress made in this union betwixt you1 before our return to ,britain1 that we shall then find no cause to continue that stop1 which at present we see necessary2 and that neither you1 nor any commission or church meeting1 do meddle in any process or business1 that may concern the purging out of the episcopal ministers4 ,and in a letter to the episcopal clergy1 he says1 ,we doubt not of your applying to1 and concurring with1 your brethren the ,presbyterian ministers1 in the terms which we have been of pains to adjust for you2 the formula will be communicated to you by our commissioners1 c4 ,see also the #bgth ,act1 ,parl4 #afie1 where it is declared1 ,that all such as shall duly come in and qualify themselves1 shall have and enjoy his majesty's protection1 as to their respective kirks and benefices1 they always containing themselves within the limits of their pastoral charge1 within their said parishes1 without offering to exercise any part of government1 unless they be first duly assumed by a competent church judicatory2 providing1 nevertheless1 that as the said ministers are left free to apply1 or not1 to the foresaid church judicatories1 c4 ,to which agree1 ,act #b;d1 ,parl4 #agjj2 ,act #c;d1 ,parl4 #agjb2 ,act #b;d1 ,parl4 #agjc1 c4 ,behold here the civil magistrate1 exercising the supremacy in matters ecclesiastical1 in that he both establishes the old ,scots curates in their respective parishes1 upon their former footing1 limits them in the exorcise of their function1 discharging them from exercising any part of ecclesiastical polity1 but upon their uniting with the ,presbyterians1 on the terms he had adjusted for them4 ,and further1 by his authority stops the exercise of church discipline against these curates 7though the most of them were notoriously scandalous72 nay1 even discharges the ,assembly from proceeding to any other business1 until they received other directions from the throne4 ,which palpable instance of ,erastianism in the state1 was not only peaceably submitted to1 but heartily acquiesced in by the church3 for as they had declared they would censure no prelatical incumbent for his principles anent church government1 however much disaffected to a covenanted reformation1 and had given frequent discoveries of their readiness to receive into communion the episcopal curates1 according to the terms prescribed by the parliament 7as appears from the ,assembly records72 so the ,assembly #afid1 ,act #aath1 having framed a sham formula1 for receiving in the curates1 containing no such thing as any renunciation of abjured prelacy1 the abominable test1 and other sinful oaths these creatures had taken1 but only an acknowledgment of the ,revolution settlement of religion1 as established by law1 by the foresaid act1 appointed their commission to receive all the episcopal clergy who applied1 and being qualified according to law1 would also subscribe their formula1 and that without requiring the least show of repentance for their scandalous public sins1 and their deep guilt of the effusion of the blood of ,god's faithful saints and witnesses during the tyranny of the two brothers4 ,these instructions to the commission and other judicatories 7as appears by their acts71 were successively renewed by the ,assembly upward of twenty times1 from #afid to #agaf1 and were indeed attended with good success1 as is evident from their address to the queen1 recorded ,act #ajth1 #agab2 where they declare1 as an instance of their moderation1 ,that since the ,revolution1 there had been taken in1 and continued1 hundreds of the episcopal curates upon the easiest terms1 viz41 such as were by the royal prerogative adjusted to them4 ,which practice1 as it declares this church homologators of ,erastianism1 so is directly opposite to ,presbyterian principles1 the discipline and practice of our reformed church of ,scotland1 and to the laws of ,christ1 the supreme lawgiver1 ,ezek4 xliv1 #aj-ae2 #b ,cor4 vi1 #ag1 #ah1 c4 #c4 ,a third instance of the ,erastianism practiced since the revolution1 is1 that the king and parliament have taken upon them to prescribe and lay down1 by magistratical authority1 conditions and qualifications1 sine qua non1 of ministers and preachers4 ,for proof of which1 see ,act #fth1 ,sess4 #dth1 ,parl4 #ast1 #afic1 where it is enacted1 ,that the said oath of allegiance be sworn the same with the foresaid assurance1 be subscribed by all preachers and ministers of the gospel whatever--certifying such of the foresaid persons as are1 or shall be1 in any public office1 and shall own and exercise the same without taking the said oath and assurance in manner foresaid1--ministers provided to kirks shall be deprived of their benefices or stipends1 and preachers shall be punished with banishment1 or otherwise1 as the council shall think fit4 ,also1 ,act #bc;d1 #afic1 it is ordained1 ,that no person be admitted or continued to be a minister1 or preach within this church1 unless that he have first taken and subscribed the oath of allegiance1 and subscribed the oath of assurance in manner appointed4 ,and further statute and ordain1 that uniformity of worship be observed by all the said ministers and preachers1 as the same are at present performed and allowed therein1 or shall hereafter be declared by the authority of the same3 and that no minister or preacher be continued and admitted hereafter1 unless that he subscribe to observe1 and do actually observe1 the foresaid uniformity4 ,the ,erastianism in these acts seems screwed up yet a little higher1 by ,act #gth1 ,sess4 #eth1 ,parl4 #ast1 #afie2 where1 after appointing a new day to such ministers as had not formerly obeyed1 it is ordained3 ,with certification that such of the said ministers as shall not come in between and said day1 are hereby1 and by the force of this present act1 ipso facto1 deprived of their respective kirks and stipends1 and the same declared vacant1 without any further sentence4 ,the ,erastianism in these acts is so manifest at first sight1 that it is needless to illustrate the same2 only it may be remarked1 that1 by these acts1 the civil magistrate prescribes new ministerial qualifications1 viz41 the oaths of allegiance and assurance2 and these imposed instead of an oath of allegiance to ,zion's ,king1 viz41 the oaths of the covenants4 ,as also1 that ministers are hereby restricted from advancing reformation1 being bound down to observe that uniformity at present allowed1 or that shall hereafter be declared by authority of parliament4 ,and further1 ,erastianism is here advanced to the degree of wresting the keys of government out of the hands of the church altogether--taking to themselves the power of deposing all such ministers as shall not submit to their anti-christian impositions1 and of declaring and ascertaining1 by their own authority1 what mode of worship or government shall take place in the church hereafter4 ,this ,erastian appointment of ministerial qualifications1 c41 is evidently injurious1 both to the headship of ,christ in his church1 and to the church's intrinsic power4 ,it pertains to the royal prerogative of ,christ1 to appoint all the qualifications of his officers1 which he has done in the ,word4 ,and it pertains to the church representative1 by applying the laws of ,christ in his ,word1 to declare who are qualified for the ministry1 and who are not4 ,but here the civil power1 without any regard to church judicatories1 by a magisterial authority1 judges and determines1 the qualifications that gospel ministers must have1 otherwise they cannot be acknowledged ministers of this church4 ,at the same time1 it must be regretted1 that the church1 instead of faithfully discovering the sinfulness of foresaid conduct1 and testifying against it1 as an anti-christian usurpation1 have declared their approbation thereof1 by taking the above named illimited oaths1 according to the parliament's order2 and also by the assembly's enjoining their commission to act conform to the parliament's directions respecting ministerial qualifications1 in their admission of those that had formerly conformed to ,episcopacy1 and refusing to admit any into their communion without having these new ministerial qualifications4 #d4 ,a fourth piece of ,erastianism exercised since the commencement of the revolution settlement1 against which the presbytery testify1 is1 the civil magistrate1 by himself and his own authority1 without consulting the church1 or any but his parliament1 privy council1 and diocesan bishops1 his appointing diets and causes of public fasting and thanksgiving4 ,a number of instances might here be condescended on4 ,so an act of the states1 anno #afhi1 for public thanksgiving4 ,an act of parliament #afic1 appointing a monthly fast1 declares1 ,that their majesties1 with advice and consent of the said estates of parliament1 do hereby command and appoint1 that a day of solemn fasting and humiliation be religiously and strictly observed1 by all persons within this kingdom1 both in church and meeting-houses1 upon the third ,thursday of the month of ,may1 and1 the third ,thursday of every month thereafter1 until intimation of forbearance be made by the lords of their majesties' privy council2 and ordains all ministers to read these presents a ,sunday before each of these fast days1 nominated1 by authority2 and ordains all disobeyers to be fined in a sum not exceeding #ajj41 and every minister who shall not obey1 to be processed before the lords of their majesties' privy council2 and requiring sheriffs to make report of the ministers who shall fail of their duty herein1 to the privy council4 ,but it is to no purpose to multiply instances of this kind1 seeing it has been the common practice of every sovereign since the revolution1 to appoint and authorize national diets of fasting1 with civil pains annexed4 ,and as the state has made these encroachments upon the royalties of ,christ1 so this church1 instead of bearing faithful testimony against the same1 have finally submitted thereto4 ,in agreeableness to the royal appointment1 they observed the monthly fast for the success of the war against ,lewis ,,xiv 7of which above71 and in favor of the ,pope1 which king ,william was bound to prosecute by virtue of a covenant made with the allies at the ,hague1 ,february1 #afia1 to be seen in the declaration of war then made against ,france1 wherein it is expressly said1 ,that no peace is to be made with ,lewis ,,xiv1 till he has made reparation to the ,holy ,see for whatsoever he has acted against it1 and till he make void all these infamous proceedings 7viz41 of the parliament of ,paris7 against the holy father1 ,innocent ,,xi4 ,behold here the acknowledgment of the ,pope's supremacy1 and his power and dignity1 both as a secular and ecclesiastical prince2 and in the observation of these fasts1 the church did mediately 7tell it not in ,gath--7 pray for success to the man of sin--a practice utterly repugnant to ,protestant1 much more to ,presbyterian1 principles1 and which will be a lasting stain upon both church and state4 ,as this church did then submit1 so since she has made a resignation and surrender of that part of the church's intrinsic right to the civil power1 see ,act #gth1 ,assem4 #agaj3 ,all ministers and members are appointed religiously to observe all fasts and thanksgivings whatever1 appointed by the church or supreme magistrate2 and the respective judicatories are appointed to take particular notice of the due observation of this1 and ,act #dth1 #agbb1 ,act #eth1 #agbe4 ,from which acts it is manifest1 that the ,revolution ,church has not only declared the power and right of authoritative indicting public fasts and thanksgivings for ordinary1 even in a constituted settled national church1 to belong1 at least equally1 to the civil magistrate1 as to the church2 but1 by their constant practice1 have undeniably given up the power of the same to the civil power altogether--it being fact1 that she never1 by her own power1 appoints a national diet of fasting1 but still applies to the king for the nomination thereof4 ,and further1 as a confirmation of this surrender1 it appears from their public records1 that when some members have protested against the observation of such diets1 the assembly would neither receive nor record such protest4 ,now1 the sinfulness of this ,erastian practice still persisted in1 is evident from the ,scriptures of truth1 where the glorious king of ,zion assigns the power of appointing fasts1 not to the civil magistrate1 but to the spiritual office-bearers in his house4 ,jer4 xiii1 #ah3 ,say unto the king and queen1 ,humble yourselves4 ,here it is the office of the prophets of the ,lord1 to enjoin humiliation work upon those that are in civil authority1 contrary to the present practice1 when kings and queens1 usurping the sacred office1 by their authority1 say to ministers1 ,humble yourselves4 ,see also1 ,joel i1 #ac1 #ad1 and ii1 #ae1 #af1 compared with ,numb4 x1 #h-aj4 ,here whatever pertains to these solemnities1 is entrusted to1 and required of1 the ministers of the ,lord1 without the intervention of civil authority4 ,the same is imported in ,matth4 xvi1 #ai1 and xviii1 #ah2 ,john xx1 #bc--;it being manifestly contained in the power of the keys committed1 by the church's head1 to ecclesiastical officers4 ,moreover1 this ,erastianism1 flowing from a spiritual supremacy exercised over the church1 is peculiarly aggravated by these particulars3 #a4 ,that commonly these fasts have been appointed on account of wars1 in which the nations were engaged1 in conjunction with gross anti-christian idolaters1 who have been most active in their endeavors to root out ,protestantism4 ,now1 it cannot but be most provoking to the ,majesty of ,heaven for professed ,presbyterians to observe fasts1 the professed design of which1 includes success to the interest of the avowed enemies of our glorious ,,redeemer4 ,again1 the above practice is aggravated1 from this consideration1 that these diets of fasting1 with civil pains annexed to them1 are sent by public proclamation1 directed to their sheriffs and other subordinate civil officers1 who are authorized to dispatch them to the ministers1 and inspect their observation thereof4 ,and while professed ministers of ,christ tamely comply with all this1 it amounts to no less1 than a base subjection of the worship of ,god1 in the solemnity of fasting in a national way1 to the arbitrament of the civil powers1 when whatever time and causes they appoint1 must be observed4 ,from all which1 in the words of the ministers of ,perth and ,fife1 in their testimony to the truth1 c41 #ageh1 the presbytery testify against the above ,erastian conduct1 as being1 in its own nature1 introductory to greater encroachments1 and putting into the hands of the civil powers1 the modeling of the worship of ,god1 and things most properly ecclesiastical4 #e4 ,another piece of ,erastianism1 respecting the present administration1 which the ,presbytery testify against1 is the king and parliament their arbitrarily imposing several of their acts and statutes upon ministers and preachers1 under ecclesiastical pains and censures2 while this ,revolution ,church1 by their silent submission and compliance therewith1 have1 at least1 interpretatively given their consent thereto4 ,thus1 as the oaths of allegiance and assurance were enjoined upon all in ecclesiastical office1 under the pain of church censure 7of which above71 so likewise1 ,act #fth1 #agjf1 ordains1 ,that no professors and principals1 bearing office in any university1 be capable1 or be admitted to continue in the exercise of their said functions1 but such as shall own the civil government1 in manner prescribed1 or to be prescribed by acts of parliament4 ,in consequence of which1 there is an ,act #agjg1 an act in the first year of king ,george ,i1 and another in the fifth year of his reign2 by all which statutes1 ecclesiastical persons are enjoined to take the oath of abjuration1 with the other oaths1 under pain of having ecclesiastical censures inflicted upon them4 ,and they ordain1 ,that no person be admitted to trials1 or licensed to preach1 until they have taken the public oaths1 on pain of being disabled4 ,the foresaid act1 in the fifth year of ,george ,i1 ordains1 all ministers and preachers to pray in express words for his majesty and the royal family1 as in former acts4 ,the king and parliament at their own hand prescribe a set form of prayer for the ,church of ,scotland1 and that under ,erastian penalties1 upon the disobeyers4 ,again1 by an act of #agcg1 framed for the more effectual bringing to justice the murderers of ,captain ,porteous1 it is enacted1 ,that this act shall be read in every parish church throughout ,scotland1 on the first ,lord's day of every month1 for one whole year1 from the first day of ,august1 #agcg1 by the minister of the parish1 in the morning1 immediately before the sermon2 and1 in case such ministers shall neglect to read this act1 as is here directed1 he shall1 for the first offense1 be declared incapable of sitting or voting in any church judicatory2 and for the second offense1 be declared incapable of taking1 holding or enjoying any ecclesiastical benefice in that part of ,great ,britain called ,scotland4 ,the ,erastianism of this act is very plain1 the penalties thereof are ecclesiastical1 and infer a kind of deposition2 seeing the disobeyers are hereby disabled from exercising and enjoying what is essential to their office4 ,moreover1 the wickedness of this act appears1 in that it was appointed to be read on the ,sabbath day1 and in time of divine service2 whereby ministers being constituted the magistrates' heralds to proclaim this act1 were obliged to profane the ,lord's day1 and corrupt his worship1 by immixing human inventions therewith1 which was directly a framing mischief into a law4 ,yet1 with all these impositions above noticed1 this church has generally complied2 and thereby declared that they are more studious of pleasing and obeying men1 than ,god1 seeing their practice therein infers no less1 than a taking instructions in the ministerial function1 and matters of divine worship1 from another head than ,christ4 #f4 ,the last piece of ,erastian administration in church and state1 the presbytery take notice of1 and testify against1 is that of patronages4 ,when the parliament #afij1 had changed the form of patronages1 by taking the power of presentations from patrons1 and lodging it in the hands of such heritors and elders as were qualified by law1 excluding the people from a vote in calling their ministers1 this ,erastian act1 spoiling the people of their just privilege1 was immediately embraced by the church1 as is evident from their overtures for church discipline1 #afif1 where they declare that only heritors and elders have a proper right to vote in the nomination of a minister4 ,also their overtures1 #agje and #agai1 do lodge the sole power of nomination of ministers in the hands of the majority of heritors1 by giving them a negative over the eldership and congregation4 ,but1 as if this had not been a sufficient usurpation of the people's right1 purchased to them by the blood of ,christ1 by an act of parliament1 #agab1 the above act1 #afij1 is repealed1 and patrons fully restored to all their former anti-christian powers over the heritage of the ,lord2 which yoke still continues to oppress the people of ,god4 ,while again1 this church1 as if more careful to please the court1 and court parasites1 than ,christ and his people1 have not only peaceably fallen in with this change1 daily practicing it in planting vacant congregations1 but1 as fond of this child of ,rome1 have further established and confirmed the power of patrons1 by the sanction of their authority1 as appears from several acts of assembly1 thereby declaring their resolutions to have this epidemic evil continued1 though it should terminate in the utter ruin of the church4 ,patronage was always by the ,church of ,scotland since the reformation1 accounted an intolerable yoke2 and therefore she never ceased contending against it until it was at last utterly abolished by acts both of reforming assemblies and parliaments2 and that as one of the inventions of the whore of ,rome4 ,as this anti-christian practice was unknown to the church in her primitive and purest times1 until gradually introduced with other popish corruptions1 so it has not the least vestige of any warrant in the word of truth3 nay1 is directly opposite thereto1 and to the apostolical practice3 ,acts i1 #ae-bd2 chap4 vi1 #b-g3 as also1 xiv1 #bc1 and xvi1 #i1 with other passages therein2--a book1 intended to give us the apostolical practice and pattern1 in the settlement of the ,christian church3 and #b ,cor4 iii1 #ai1 c4 ,wherefore the presbytery testify against this ,erastian usurpation1 as most sinful in itself1 most injurious to the church of ,christ1 and inconsistent with the great ends of the ministry2 and against this church1 for not only submitting unto1 but even promoting this wickedness2 which is evident1 from her deposing some of her members1 for no other reason but because they could not approve of this pernicious scheme4 ,witness ,mr4 ,gallespie1 minister at ,carnock1 who was deposed ,may1 #ageb3 and against all violent intruders1 who1 not entering by the door1 can be regarded only as thieves and robbers2 ,john x1 #a4 ,these are a few of the many instances of the ,erastian usurpations of the headship of ,christ1 as a ,son1 in and over his own house1 and of the church's intrinsic power assumed by the state1 and consented to by this church since the ,revolution4#b ,and without condescending upon any more1 the presbytery concludes this part1 with observing upon the whole1 that when ,henry ,,viii of ,england did cast off the authority of the see of ,rome1 and refused to give that subjection to the pope formerly paid by him and his predecessors2 he did1 at the same time1 assume to himself all that power in his dominions1 which the pope formerly claimed2 and soon afterward procured to have himself acknowledged and declared1 by act of parliament1 to be head of the church--head over all persons1 and in all causes1 civil and ecclesiastical4 ,and which anti-christian supremacy has1 ever since1 continued an essential part of the ,english constitution1 and inherent right of the crown2 so that all the crowned heads there1 have ever since been as little popes over that realm3 and that all such still appropriate unto themselves that blasphemous anti-christian title of the head of the church1 and supreme judge in all causes1 is undeniably evident from the known laws and canons of ,england3 and further appears from a declaration made by ,king ,george ,i1 ,june #acth1 #agae1 where he styles himself ,defender of the faith1 and supreme ,governor of the church in his dominions2 declaring1 that before the clergy can order or settle any differences about the external policy of the church1 they must first obtain leave under his broad seal so to do4 ,which title or authority for man1 or angel1 to assume1 is a downright dethroning and exauctorating of ,christ1 the only and alone ,head and ,supreme ,governor of his church4 ,from this spiritual anti-christian supremacy1 granted by ,english laws to the king of ,england1 confirmed and established1 by virtue of the incorporating union1 in ,british kings1 by acts of ,british parliament1 do flow all the forementioned acts imposed upon the ,revolution ,church of ,scotland4 ,and as these acts and laws declare1 that the ,british monarch confines not his spiritual supremacy to the church of ,england1 but it extends it also over the church of ,scotland3 so this ,revolution ,church1 having never either judicially or practically lifted up the standard of a public1 free and faithful testimony1 against these sinful usurpations1 flowing from the fountain of said supremacy1 and clothed with the authority of an anti-christian parliament1 where abjured bishops sit constituent members1 but1 on the contrary1 has submitted to every one of them2 therefore1 this church may justly be constructed1 as approvers and maintainers of ,erastian supremacy4 ,and hereby1 indeed1 the revolt of these degenerate lands from their sworn subjection and obedience to the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 as supreme in his own house1 is completed1 when they have these many years substituted another in his place1 and framed supremacy into a standing law1 to be the rule1 according to which their kings must lord it over the house and heritage of the ,living ,god4 ,again3 ,the presbytery testify against the manifold1 and almost uninterrupted opposition to the ancient glorious uniformity in religion between the nations1 that has appeared in the administrations of both church and state1 since the last ,revolution4 ,the revolution constitution and settlement of religion1 as has been already observed1 laid our solemn covenants and work of reformation1 sworn to therein1 in a grave1 and many stones have since been brought and cast upon them3 many ways and measures have both church and state taken to make sure the revolution sepulcher of a covenanted work of reformation1 and prevent1 if possible1 its future resurrection3 against all which1 the presbytery judge themselves bound to lift up their testimony4 ,particularly1 #a4 ,the presbytery testify against the incorporating union of this nation with ,england2 and as being an union founded upon an open violation of all the articles of the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 still binding upon the nations2 and consequently1 destructive of that uniformity in religion1 once happily attained to by them3 which will at first view appear1 by comparing the articles of the union with those of the ,solemn ,league4 ,all associations and confederacies with the enemies of true religion and godliness1 are expressly condemned in scripture1 and represented as dangerous to the true ,israel of ,god3 ,isa4 viii1 #ab2 ,jer4 ii1 #bh2 ,psal4 cvi1 #ce2 ,hos4 v1 #ac1 and vii1 #h1 #aa2 #b ,cor4 vi1 #ad1 #ae4 ,and if simple confederacies with malignants and enemies to the cause of ,christ are condemned1 much more is an incorporation with them1 which is an embodying of two into one1 and1 therefore1 a straiter conjunction4 ,and taking the definition of malignants1 given by the declaration of both kingdoms joined in arms1 anno #afdc1 to be just1 which says1 such as would not take the covenant1 were declared to be public enemies to their religion and country1 and that they are to be censured and punished1 as professed adversaries and malignants2 it cannot be refused1 but that the prelatical party in ,england1 now joined with1 are such4 ,further1 by this incorporating union1 this nation is obliged to support the idolatrous ,church of ,england2 agreeable whereto1 the ,scottish parliament1 in their act of security1 relative to the treaty of union1 declares1 that the parliament of ,england may provide for the security of the ,church of ,england1 as they think expedient4 ,accordingly1 the ,english parliament1 before entering upon the treaty of union with ,scotland1 framed an act for securing the ,church of ,england's hierarchy and worship1 as by law established4 ,which act1 they declare1 ,shall be inserted1 in express terms1 in any act of parliament which shall be made for settling and ratifying any treaty of union1 and shall be declared to be an essential fundamental part thereof4 ,hence1 the act of the ,english parliament for the union of the two kingdoms1 contains the above act for securing the ,church of ,england4 ,which act being sent down to ,scotland1 stands recorded among the acts of the last ,scottish parliament4 ,moreover1 the last article of said union contains1 that all laws and statutes in either kingdom1 so far as they are contrary to1 or inconsistent with the terms of these articles1 or any of them1 shall1 from and after the union1 cease and become void2 which1 as in the act of exemplification1 was declared to be1 by the parliaments of both kingdoms4 ,thus1 this nation1 by engrossing the ,english act1 establishing ,prelacy1 and all the superstitious ceremonies1 in the act of the union parliament1 and by annulling all acts contrary to the united settlement1 have sealed1 as far as men can do1 the gravestones formerly laid upon the covenanted uniformity of the nations4 ,to all which the revolution church1 by consenting1 and practically approving this unhallowed union1 have said ,amen2 though1 at first1 some of the members opposed and preached against it1 yet afterward changed1 and 7if some historians may be credited7 by the influence of gold1 were swayed to an approbation4 ,this church's consent to the union is evident1 from their accepting of the act of security1 enacted by the ,scots parliament1 as the legal establishment and security of the ,church of ,scotland2 and from the assembly #agae1 utterly rejecting a proposal to make a representation to the king1 that the incorporating union was a grievance to the ,church of ,scotland2 though it ought still to be regarded as such1 by all the lovers of reformation principles1 because it is a disclaiming of our sworn duty1 to endeavor the reformation of ,england and ,ireland4 ,it is a consenting to the legal and unalterable establishment of abjured ,prelacy in them1 obliges the sovereigns of ,great ,britain to swear to the preservation of the prelatical constitution1 and idolatrous ceremonies of the episcopal church1 and join in communion therewith2 and1 therefore1 for ever secludes all true ,presbyterians from the supreme rule4 ,this union establishes the civil1 lordly power of bishops1 obliging the ,church of ,scotland to acknowledge them as their lawful magistrates and ministers1 to pray for a blessing upon them in the exercise of their civil power1 and is therefore a solemn ratification of anti-christian ,erastianism4 ,it has formally rescinded1 and for ever made void any act or acts1 in favor of a covenanted uniformity in religion1 that might be supposed to be in force before this union3 and therefore1 while it stands1 it is impossible there can be a revival of that blessed work1 which was once the glory of the nations of ,scotland1 ,england and ,ireland4 #b4 ,the presbytery testify against the sinful practice of imposing oaths upon the subjects1 contradictory to presbyterian principles in general1 and the oath of the covenants in particular1 as the allegiance1 and particularly the abjuration2 all which oaths1 imposed by a ,british parliament1 exclude our covenanted uniformity1 and homologate the united constitution4 ,but1 to prevent mistakes1 let it be here observed1 that the presbytery do not testify against any of these oaths1 out of the remotest regard to the spurious pretended right of a popish pretender to the throne and crown of these kingdoms2 for they judge and declare1 that1 by the word of ,god1 and fundamental laws of the nations1 he can have no right1 title or claim1 to be king of these covenanted kingdoms--seeing1 by our covenants and laws1 establishing the covenanted reformation1 which are well founded on the divine law1 all ,papists1 as well as ,prelatists1 are forever excluded from the throne of these1 and especially of this land4 ,so that it is utterly inconsistent with the principles maintained by this presbytery1 constituted upon the footing of the covenanted church of ,scotland1 and the oath of ,god they1 with the nations1 are under1 ever to acknowledge and own the popish pretender1 or any of that cursed race1 as their king2 but they testify against these oaths1 because they bind to the acknowledgment of the lawfulness of a prelatic ,erastian constitution of civil government1 and homologate the incorporating union1 in one article whereof1 it is declared1 that these words1 ,this realm1 and the crown of this realm1 c1 mentioned in the oaths1 shall be understood of the crown and realm of ,great ,britain1 c42 and that in that sense the said oaths shall be taken and subscribed1 and particularly the oath of abjuration1 which whosoever takes1 swears to maintain ,erastian supremacy1 ,prelacy1 and ,english popish ceremonies2 and so1 at least1 by native and necessary consequence1 the swearing thereof is an abjuring of our sacred covenants4 ,but that which puts it beyond all dispute1 that the oath of abjuration1 in the literal sense thereof1 obliges to maintain the prelatic constitution of ,england1 both in church and state1 as by law established1 and secured by the union act1 is the express words of that act of parliament1 by which this oath was imposed1 and to which it expressly refers1 viz41 the act of further limitation1 where it is said3 ,on which said acts 7viz41 of limitation1 and further limitation71 the preservation of your majesty's royal person and government1 and the maintaining of the church of ,england1 as by law established1 do1 under ,god1 entirely depend4 ,to the intent therefore1 that these acts may be forever inviolably preserved1 it is hereby enacted1 that magistrates and ministers shall take the following oath1 namely1 of abjuration4 ,the above act1 then1 declaring that said oath was directly intended for the support and establishment of the prelatic church of ,england1 it follows1 that this oath is a solemn abjuration of the covenanted reformation1 as it is also expressly repugnant to ,presbyterian principles4 ,but though the above oath is so manifestly sinful1 yet the ministers of this church did neither faithfully warn others of the sin and danger thereof1 nor faithfully oppose it when imposed on themselves2 but1 agreeing that every one should act therein as he thought proper1 they who refused it may be reputed socii criminis with the generality1 who1 contrary to their professed principles1 did take and subscribe the same1 and that 7as says the oath7 heartily and willingly2 whereby they not only engaged to maintain a prelatic government1 ,prelacy1 with all its popish ceremonies1 but to maintain only a prelatic government1 and to oppose all others1 even though ,presbyterian1 in their accession to the throne2 and this by virtue of the sinful limitations and conditions1 wherewith the oath is clogged4 ,and hereby1 these nominal ,presbyterians discover that they are not possessed of a zeal for the advancement of the true ,presbyterian cause and principles1 proportionable to that which the ,english discover for their will worship and superstition4 #c4 ,the presbytery testify against a sinful and almost boundless toleration1 granted anno #agab1 a woful fruit of the union2 by which toleration act1 not only those of the ,episcopal communion in ,scotland have the protection of authority1 but a wide door is cast open1 and ample pass given to all sects and heretics 7popish recusants and antitrinitarians some way excepted1 who yet are numerous in the nation71 to make whatever attacks they please upon the kingdom and interest of our glorious ,redeemer1 in order to the advancement of their own and the devil's1 and all with impunity4 ,the foresaid act warrants the ,episcopal clergy publicly to administer all ordinances1 and perform their worship after their own manner1 with all the popish canons and ceremonies thereof1 and obliges all magistrates to protect and assist them1 while it destroys the hedge of church discipline against the scandalous and profane1 and is1 therefore1 a settling and establishing of ,prelacy in ,scotland1 giving it a security1 little1 if anything1 inferior to that which the established church has4 ,again1 by a clause in the toleration bill1 the security given by former laws to ,presbyterian church government and discipline1 is undermined and taken away1 at least rendered ineffectual1 and made the subject of ridicule to the openly profane1 by the civil magistrate's withdrawing his concurrence1 in as much as it declares the civil pain of excommunication to be taken away1 and that none are to be compelled to appear before church judicatories4 ,there is nothing in religion of an indifferent nature2 ,for whosoever saith ,christ shall break one of the least of these commandments1 and shall teach men so1 shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven4 ,it must1 then1 be the most daring wickedness1 and an affronting of the ,majesty of ,heaven in the highest manner1 for an earthly monarch to pretend to enact a toleration of religions1 and thereby give a liberty where the divine law has laid a restraint2 it implies an exalting of himself1 not only to an equality with1 but to a state of superiority above1 the ,god of glory4 ,whatever principles are of divine authority require no toleration from man2 it is wickedness to pretend to do it1 seeing whatever comes under the necessity of a toleration1 properly so called1 falls1 at the same time1 under the notion of a crime4 ,and no less wicked is it for a magistrate to protect1 by a promiscuous toleration1 all heretics1 heresies and errors2 yea1 it is a manifest breach of trust1 and plain perverting the end of his office1 seeing he is appointed to be custos et vindex utriusque tabulae1 intrusted with the concerns of ,god's glory1 as well as the interests of men4 ,experience has1 in every age1 taught1 that a toleration of all religions is the cut-throat and ruin of all true religion4 ,it is the most effectual method that ever the policy of hell hatched1 to banish all true godliness out of the world4 ,but however manifold the evils be that toleration is big with1 this church1 instead of opposing1 seems to have complied therewith1 and to be of toleration principles2 which is evident1 not only from their receiving into communion the ,scots curates1 of which above2 but from their joining in communion with ,mr4 ,whitefield 7an ,english curate and member of that church1 and ring-leader of the ,methodists there71 when he is in ,scotland4 ,again1 it is known1 that when the ,scots gentlemen are sent to attend the ,british parliament1 or at any time in ,england1 they do1 many of them1 join in communion with the prelatic church--nay1 are guilty of taking the sacramental test 7that is1 taking the sacrament after their superstitious manner1 to qualify them for any public post72 yet this church receives them into the closest communion1 without requiring any satisfaction for these evils2 whereby they act contrary to ,christ's example1 in purging and keeping his house pure1 and contrary to the ,scripture2 ,rev4 ii1 #ad1 #ae1 #bj4 #d4 ,in like manner1 the presbytery testify against the tyranny that has frequently appeared in the administration since the revolution1 both in church and state4 ,the civil powers have discovered not a little of tyrannical and arbitrary power1 in imposing their laws1 statutes and injunctions1 upon the church1 as in the instances of the particulars formerly noticed4 ,but further1 it has appeared in their fining and imprisoning persons1 because 7though endeavoring to live peaceably1 as far as possible1 with all men7 they could not1 in conscience1 and in a due regard to the covenanted cause1 own the lawfulness of their authority1 by swearing fidelity to the present constitution4 ,again1 in their dispensing with1 and counteracting1 the law of ,god in a variety of instances4 ,thus1 while1 without any divine warrant1 the crime of theft is capitally punished1 yet the grossest adulterers1 who are capitally punishable by the divine law1 pass with impunity4 ,and frequently reprieves1 and sometimes pardons 7as in the case of ,porteous71 have been granted to murderers1 expressly contrary to the law of ,god1 which declares that ,whosoever sheddeth man's blood1 by man shall his blood be shed4 ,another astonishing and full evidence of the above charge1 is in the act repealing the penal statutes against witches1 c41 #agce1 where it is enacted1 ,that no prosecution1 suit or proceeding1 shall be carried on against any person or persons1 for witchcraft1 sorcery1 enchantment or conjuration1 c4 ,this act1 in plain terms1 flatly contradicts and opposes the law of ,god1 in the very letter thereof4 ,see ,levit4 xx1 #f1 #bg2 ,deut4 xviii1 #aj-ab2 ,exod4 xxii1 #ah4 ,not only has the state1 in these and other instances 7as the imposing almost intolerable taxations upon the impoverished subjects1 for supporting the grandeur of useless and wicked pensioners1 and for carrying on wars1 often not only sinful in respect of their rise and causes1 but in their nature and tendency unprofitable to the nations71 been guilty of this evil1 but also the ,revolution ,church has exercised a most tyrannical government4 ,as many of the constituent members of the ,revolution ,church had shown a persecuting1 tyrannizing spirit1 against the faithful contenders for the truth1 in the matter of the public resolutions1 so the same spirit has still continued since the revolution1 and frequently exerted itself in a most arbitrary manner1 against all who have made any appearance for a covenanted work of reformation4 ,accordingly1 soon after the revolution1 this church raised some processes against ,mr4 ,john ,hepburn1 minister at ,orr1 under pretense of some irregularities1 but in reality1 for his making some appearance against their abounding defection1 and for a covenanted work of reformation1 and continued their prosecution to suspension and deposition2 and further1 applied to the civil magistrate1 to apprehend said ,mr4 ,hepburn1 who accordingly was imprisoned in ,edinburgh1 and then1 because of his preaching to the people out of a window1 was carried to ,stirling castle1 and kept close prisoner there for a considerable time1 as a book1 entitled ,humble ,pleadings1 fully discovers4 ,they likewise exercised their tyranny against ,messrs4 ,gilchrist in ,dunscore1 and ,taylor in ,wamphray1 whom they prosecuted1 not only to deposition1 but even excommunication1 for no reason but their bearing testimony against that ensnaring oath of abjuration1 and a number of other defections4 ,again1 this church1 still fond of suppressing the good old cause and owners thereof1 framed and prosecuted a libel1 most unjustly 7some even of themselves being judges71 against ,mr4 ,john ,mc,millan1 minister in ,balmaghie1 for presenting1 in a regular manner1 a paper of real and acknowledged grievances2 and1 because he would not resile from it1 but continued to plead for a redress1 was at last deposed4 ,as also ,mr4 ,john ,mc,neil1 preacher1 for the same reason1 had his license taken from him2 and1 by the authority of the assembly1 both of them were prosecuted and censured1 not for scandal1 insufficiency or negligence1 error in doctrine1 c41 but only on account of their pleading for the covenanted reformation of the ,church of ,scotland1 and maintaining a necessary testimony against the prevailing corruptions and defections of former and present times1 as appears from their paper of grievances and joint declinature1 printed #agjh4 ,nay1 such was their mad zeal against reformation principles1 that1 by the ,act #aeth of ,assem4 #agae1 the commission was not only empowered to censure all the forementioned persons1 but also enjoined to apply to the civil magistrate for suppressing and punishing them2 and accordingly sundry of them were proclaimed rebels over public market crosses1 only for their continued adherence to reformation4 ,and besides other instances1 their magisterial and lordly power exercised over the flock of ,christ1 in the violent intrusion of ministers into vacant churches over the belly of the people1 and then excommunicating from sealing ordinances such as cannot in conscience submit to the ministry of these intruders1 is a most glaring one2 while at the same time1 severe censures are inflicted upon such ministers as have the honesty to oppose these anti-christian measures4 ,loud complaints have likewise been made against their arbitrary and tyrannical conduct1 with reference to ,mr4 ,ebenezer ,erskine1 and others with him1 designated by the name of the ,associate ,presbytery1 because of their remonstrating against1 and endeavoring to rectify1 some of the forementioned evils in the church2 the justness of which grievances and complaints may be instructed from their own writings on that head4 ,it must not be here omitted to remark1 that as this church is justly charged with tyranny in government1 so she is equally guilty of partiality in discipline4 ,though all that discover any measure of faithfulness in the concerns of ,christ's glory1 are sure to meet with most severe treatment1 yet the loose1 profane and erroneous1 have seldom any church censures put in execution against them4 ,this church never made any suitable inquiry into the sinful compliances1 and sad defections of her members and office-bearers1 during the persecuting period3 and that unfaithfulness in the exercise of church discipline is still copied after4 ,how few1 guilty of the most gross scandals1 are censured1 such as notorious drunkenness1 blasphemy1 cursing1 swearing1 sabbath-breaking1 uncleanness1 especially among the rich1 who are capable to give pecuniary mulcts to free them from church censure8 7,thus1 in conformity to the prelatical and anti-christian example1 setting to sale the censures of the church1 and dispensing with the laws of ,christ for money47 ,nay1 not only are such overlooked1 but many guilty of these gross sins1 together with oppression1 neglecters of family worship1 and the grossly ignorant1 are without any public acknowledgement of these sins1 admitted to the highest and most solemn ordinances1 viz41 both sacraments4 ,and this may be thought the less strange1 when persons chargeable with most of these sins1 are admitted1 and continued to be office-bearers in the house of ,god4 ,persons1 and even teachers maintaining most dreadful blasphemous errors connived at1 patronized1 or but slightly censured1 and still kept in communion1 without any open renunciation of these heresies4 ,play-houses1 the seminaries of vice and impiety1 erected in the principal cities of the nation1 and stage players1 commonly among the most abandoned of mankind1 escape with impunity4 ,yea1 this pagan entertainment of the stage is countenanced by the members and office-bearers of this church1 and that to such a degree1 that one of the ministers thereof has commenced author of a most profane play1 called ,the ,tragedy of ,douglas1 wherein immorality is promoted1 and what is sacred exposed to ridicule4 ,oh6 how astonishing6 that a minister in the once famous church of ,scotland should be guilty of such abominations1 and yet not immediately sentenced to bear the highest of all church censure6 #e4 ,the ,presbytery testify against this established church1 for unfaithfulness of doctrine2 which will appear by a few instances3 although before the ,revolution1 the ,lord ,jesus was openly1 as far as human laws could do1 divested of his headship and sovereignty in and over his church2 although the divine right of presbytery had been publicly and nationally exploded1 derided and denied1 yet this church has never by any formal act1 declared that our ,lord ,jesus ,christ is sole king1 the alone supreme head of his church--nor in the same manner declared that the presbyterian form of church government is of divine right1 and condemned all other forms as contrary to the word4 ,such a testimony was the more necessary1 when the civil powers have arrogated ,christ's power to themselves1 and continue to exercise it over his church2 and the want of it is an evidence of the church's unsoundness in the doctrine of government1 and of ,christ's kingly office4 ,this church's error in doctrine further appears from their condemnation of a book entitled ,the marrow of modern divinity1 as containing gross antinomian errors2 whereby they condemned many great gospel truths as errors1 particularly1 that believers are altogether set free from the law1 as a covenant of works1 both from its commanding and condemning power1 together with others2 whereby they have made way for1 and encouraged that legal1 moral way of harranguing1 exclusive of ,christ and his most perfect righteousness 7which is so common and frequent in all parts of the land71 and opened a door for introducing ,baxterian principles1 which1 in consequence hereof1 have since very much prevailed4 ,another evidence of this church's unsoundness and unfaithfulness in doctrine1 is their excessive1 sinful lenity toward the most gross heretics4 ,notwithstanding ,arminian and ,pelagian heresies1 and ,arian blasphemies1 have been publicly taught2 and although true godliness1 and the effectual working of the ,spirit on the souls of men have been publicly exposed as enthusiasm1 and many other damnable heresies vented1 yet this church has never lifted up the faithful standard of a judicial testimony1 in condemnation of these heresies1 and in vindication of the precious truths of ,christ thereby impugned4 ,and when the ministers and members of this church have been processed before her assemblies1 and convicted of maintaining many gross errors1 no adequate censure has been inflicted4 ,this particularly appears in the case of ,mr4 ,simpson1 professor of divinity in the college of ,glasgow1 when processed before the judicatories of this church1 in the years #agae and #agaf1 for several gross errors2 such as1 ,that regard to our own happiness1 in the enjoyment of ,god1 ought to be our chief motive in serving him1 and that our glorifying of ,god is subordinate to it3 that ,adam was not our federal head2 and other ,arminian1 ,socinian and ,pelagian heresies1 all to be found in his answers to ,mr4 ,webster's libel given in against him1 and clearly proven3 yet was he dismissed with a very gentle admonition4 ,which sinful lenity encouraged him1 not only to persist in the same errors1 but also to the venting of ,arian heresies among his students4 ,accordingly1 he was again arraigned before the assembly's bar in the years #agbg-bh-bi1 when it was found clearly proven that he had denied the necessary existence of our ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 and the numerical ,oneness of the ,three ,persons of the ,trinity in substance and essence1 with other damnable tenets4 ,yet when these articles1 whereby he had attempted to depose the ,son of ,god from his supreme deity1 were proven1 and when 7as one of the members of this church1 in his protest against the assembly's sentence1 said7 the ,son of ,god was1 as it were1 appearing at the bar of that assembly1 craving justice against one who had derogated from his essential glory1 and blasphemed his name1 at which every knee should bow4 ,yet such was the corruption and unfaithfulness of this church1 that the blasphemer was dismissed without any adequate censure passed upon him1 and still continued in the character of a minister and member of this church4 ,again1 when ,mr4 ,campbell1 professor of church history at ,st4 ,andrews1 was processed before the judicatories of this church1 for maintaining a scheme of dangerous and most pernicious principles1 which he published to the world1 having a manifest tendency to subvert revealed religion1 and expose the exercise of serious godliness1 under the notion of enthusiasm2 to advance self-love1 as the leading1 principle and motive in all human actions whatever1 and to destroy the self-sufficiency of ,god1 making him a debtor to his creatures3 yet though these1 with a number of ,god-dishonoring1 creature-exalting1 and soul-ruining errors1 were notorious from his books1 and were defended by him2 the heretic1 instead of being duly censured1 was countenanced and carressed3 whereby this church has given a most deep wound to some of the most important truths of the ,christian religion1 and becomes chargeable with the guilt of all the errors maintained by that erroneous professor4 ,a third instance of this church's unfaithfulness1 appears in the case of ,mr4 ,glas1 and others1 who openly vented1 by preaching and printing1 independent schemes of church government1 with some new improvements2 attacked our ,confession of faith and ,covenants1 unhinging all order and government in the church1 pulled up the hedge of discipline1 to introduce all errors in doctrine1 and corruption in worship2 and1 at last1 openly renounced presbytery1 name and thing 7denying that there is any warrant for national churches under the ,new ,testament71 and asserted1 that our martyrs1 who suffered for adhering to the covenanted reformation1 were so far in a delusion1 with many other sectarian tenets3 for which1 the church at first suspended1 and then deposed some of them4 ,but afterward1 as if this church repented of doing so much in favor of presbytery1 they were reponed1 to the great danger of the church3 for having discovered no remorse for their errors1 they immediately employed all their parts to shake presbytery1 by setting up independent churches and ordaining several mechanics to be their ministers2 and nothing done by the church for putting a stop to these errors1 and for reviving and vindicating the precious truths they had impugned4 ,likewise1 when ,mr4 ,wishart was staged for error vented by him in some of his sermons1 with respect to the influence of arguments taken from the awe of future rewards and punishments1 and other erroneous notions2 he was dismissed without any renunciation of his heterodox principles1 and assoilzied by the judicatories of this church3 and1 as easy absolutions encourage error1 so no sooner was he assoilzied1 but he had the assurance to recommend erroneous books1 such as ,doctor ,whitchcot's sermons1 to his students4 ,it is indeed no small evidence of the unsoundness of this church1 when the heads of colleges are suffered1 impune1 to recommend such books for students and probationers to form upon4 ,again1 when professor ,leechman was quarreled with for his deistical sermon on prayer1 by the presbytery of ,glasgow1 and afterward carried before the assembly2 yet although in all his sermons1 he presents ,god as the object of prayer1 merely as our ,creator1 without any relation to ,christ1 as ,mediator2 but recommends to his hearers1 as the only acceptable disposition of mind1 an assured confidence in the goodness and mercy of their ,creator3 not only has that ,christless sermon been very much extolled1 but the author dismissed from the assembly's bar in such a manner1 as if thereby he had merited their applause4 ,from all which it sufficiently appears1 that this church is unsound and unfaithful1 in point of doctrine2 especially1 if it is considered1 that she has been frequently addressed by representations1 declaring the necessity of an assertory net1 affirming and ascertaining the precious truths injured and impuned1 and that publicly1 by the above mentioned errors2 and that a solemn warning should be emitted1 discovering the evil and danger of them3 yet that necessary duty has still been contemned and disregarded4 ,the great truths of ,god1 have1 for many years1 lain wounded and bleeding in our streets1 trampled upon by their open and daring enemies2 while this church has entirely forgotten and slighted the divine command1 to contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints4 ,and though the ,westminster ,confession of ,faith continues to be subscribed by intrants into the ministry 7the covenants owned by the ,reformed ,church of ,scotland1 as a part of her confession1 being abstracted from the confession of this present church71 yet how little of that system and order of doctrine is now taught8 the generality having just as much of ,christ1 and the doctrines of his cross1 in most of their discourses1 as is to be found in the writings of ,plato1 ,epictetus and ,seneca1 and the rest of the ,pagan moralists4 ,so that this church appears orthodox1 in little 7or no7 other sense than the church of ,england is so1 viz41 by subscribing the thirty-nine articles1 which are ,calvinistical in the doctrinal parts2 while yet the ,arminian system of doctrine is generally received and taught by her clergy4 ,add to what is above1 that this church maintains no suitable testimony against sins of all sorts1 in persons of all stations2 neither emits faithful warnings anent the snares and dangers of the nation1 nor full and free declarations of present duty1 as church judicatories1 like faithful watchmen did in former times4 ,but such faithfulness in ,god's matters is not now1 alas6 to be expected2 seeing this church has made a formal concert1 or mutual paction1 binding up one another from preaching against1 and applying their doctrines to the sins1 corruptions and scandals of the times3 see ,acts of ,assem4 #afth1 #agth1 anno #agab2 ,act #fth1 #agac2 ,act #hth1 #agad2 ,act #fth1 #agae4 ,the ,presbytery cannot also here omit observing1 and that with deep regret1 that although the most damnable principles1 which have a direct tendency to deny the being of ,god1 and so to propagate opinionative atheism1 to subvert all religion1 to extol the power of corrupt nature1 and exalt ,popery1 as the best form of religion1 to deny the subjection of the world to the providence of ,god1 to destroy all distinction between virtue and vice1 and consequently affirm1 that there is no moral evil in the world1 and to ridicule ,christianity1 as destitute of divine authority1 have been lately vented by ,david ,hume1 ,esq42 and another designated by the name of ,sopho3 yet this church has passed no suitable censure upon the authors of these impious and blasphemous principles1 though they justly deserve the very highest3 nor have they done anything to testify their dislike1 or put an effectual stop to the spreading of these abominable tenets4 ,the presbytery therefore1 as they declare their abhorrence of these1 and the other errors formerly mentioned1 so testify against the church's notorious unfaithfulness1 in suffering these wretches to pass with impunity2 and as being1 on all these accounts noticed1 unsound and corrupt1 in the matter of doctrine1 c4 ,it may also be here remarked1 as an undoubted evidence of the corruptness of the state1 that1 although there are civil laws presently in being1 which declare the maintaining of antitrinitarian1 atheistical principles1 to be not only criminal1 but capital2 yet the civil powers in the nation have not so much regard to ,god1 and the ,son of ,god1 as to punish treason openly acted against them4 #f4 ,the presbytery testify against both church and state1 for their sinful associations with malignants3 as declared enemies to the covenanted interest have engrossed the civil power wholly to their hands1 since the public resolutions1 that a door was opened for their admission2 so such is the nature of the laws presently extant and in force1 that one cannot be admitted to any office1 civil or military1 but by swearing away all friendship to a covenanted reformation4 ,and1 moreover1 all along since the late ,revolution1 the nations have been the most earnest pursuing after friendship with the grossest idolators2 and1 in express contradiction to the word of ,god1 have confederated in the closest alliance with ,god's declared enemies abroad2 nay1 have exhausted their strength and substance1 in maintaining the quarrel of such as have been remarkable for their hatred at1 and persecution of the protestant interest4 ,the ,revolution ,church has also said a confederacy with such as have1 on all occasions1 shewed a rooted enmity and hatred at reformation principles3 which appears from their admitting such 7noticed above7 to be office-bearers in the church3 from their observing fasts1 and praying for success to the allied armies1 though almost wholly composed of such1 and many of them oftentimes gross ,popish idolaters3 from their going in with1 and approving of the sinful incorporating union with ,england3 from their acknowledging the civil power of church men as lawful3 from their joining in religious communion with ,mr4 ,whitefield2 and in many other instances4 ,not to insist further in enumerating particulars1 the ,presbytery finally testify against church and state1 for their negligence to suppress impiety1 vice1 and superstitious observance of holy days1 c4 ,the civil powers herein acting directly contrary to the nature and perverting the very ends of the magistrate's office1 which is to be custos et vindex utriusque tabulae2 the minister of ,god1 a revenger1 to execute wrath on him that doeth evil4 ,transgressors of the first table of the law may now sin openly with impunity2 and1 while the religious observation of the sabbath is not regarded1 the superstitious observation of holy-days1 even in ,scotland1 is so much authorized1 that on some of them the most considerable courts of justice are discharged to sit4 ,stage-plays1 masquerades1 balls1 assemblies1 and promiscuous dancings1 the very nurseries of impiety and wickedness1 are not only tolerated1 but even countenanced by law4 ,and as these1 with other evils1 are permitted by the civil powers2 so this church seems to have lost all zeal against sin4 ,no suitable endeavors are used to prevent the growth of atheism1 idolatry and superstition3 and though ,prelacy1 as well as ,popery1 is growing apace in the lands1 and organs publicly used in that superstitious worship2 yet no testimony is given against them1 but new modes introduced into the worship of ,god1 for carnal ends1 as a gradual advance toward that superstition4 ,yea1 so unconcerned about suppressing vice and extravagant vanity1 c1 that not only are the forementioned nurseries of sin frequented by ministers' children1 but ministers themselves have countenanced them by their presence1 to the great scandal of their office1 and manifest encouragement of these seminaries of immorality4 ,and notwithstanding that by the late proclamation1 the penal laws against vice and profanity seem to be revived 7which is in itself so far good71 yet this cannot supersede or remove the ground of the ,presbytery's testimony against church and state complexly1 on the above account1 or even against the thing itself1 in the manner that it is gone about4 ,for besides that1 notwithstanding of all former endeavors of this kind1 since the overthrow of our scriptural and covenanted reformation1 immorality and wickedness have still increased and overflowed all these banks2 partly1 because1 after all their pretenses1 the laws were not vigorously put in execution 7and as good1 no law nor penalty1 as no execution71 and partly1 because these law-makers1 being also themselves the law-breakers1 have entrusted the execution to such as are generally ringleaders in a variety of gross immoralities2 it is not likely1 that ever ,god will countenance and bless such attempts1 whereby 7contrary to scripture and all good order7 the ecclesiastical power is subjected to the civil1 and ministers made the bare inspectors of men's manners1 and informers to inferior judges1 without having it in their power to oblige such transgressors 7if obstinate7 to compear before church judicatories1 and conform and submit to the laws of ,christ's house4 ,nay1 so far will ,god be from approving such ,erastian methods of reformation1 that he will certainly visit for this1 among all our other iniquities1 and in his own due time make a breach upon us1 because we sought him not in the due order4 ,wherefore1 and for all these grounds1 the ,presbytery testify against both church and state1 as in their constitutions ,erastian and anti-scriptural1 including the substitution and acknowledgement of another head and governor over the church than ,christ1 as may be sufficiently evident from proofs above adduced4 ,and particularly1 because the ,british united constitution is such as involves the whole land1 and all ranks therein1 in the dreadful guilt of idolatry1 communicating with idolators1 apostasy1 perjury1 c4#c ,they declare they can have no communion therewith2 but that it is such an association as that ,god's call to his people1 concerning it1 is1 ,come out from among them4 ,be ye separate1 and touch not the unclean thing1 and ,i will receive you1 saith the ,lord4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,supplement ,,to ,,part ,,second4 ,for as much as a good number of people in the north of ,ireland have acceded1 and submitted themselves to the ,presbytery1 and one of their number is fixed among them as their proper pastor2 the ,presbytery intended to have subjoined something by way of appendix to the above ,testimony1 with relation to the state of religion in that kingdom1 especially with regard to the settlement of the presbyterian religion there4 ,but as diocesan ,episcopacy is the religion there established by law1 against which the ,presbytery has declared and testified 7as above7 as an anti-scriptural1 anti-covenanted and merely a human and political settlement 7whether considered abstractly or complexly with that in the kingdom of ,scotland71 there needs nothing be further said anent it4 ,and as those called ,presbyterians in ,ireland1 are equally enemies to the true covenanted ,presbyterian cause with those of the ,revolution ,church of ,scotland2 so the above testimony equally strikes against them with the other4 ,there seems1 however1 to be this considerable difference betwixt the ,presbyterians in ,scotland and ,ireland1 viz41 ,that although the settlements the same as to the matter of it1 yet so it is not as to the form or manner of it1 the ,presbyterians in ,ireland neither having1 nor claiming any other security or foundation for their different mode of religious worship than the royal indulgence1 or toleration ,act4 ,and therefore1 as the ,presbytery did and do testify against toleration1 and toleration principles1 disclaiming such an anti-scriptural shelter2 they therein1 of consequence1 bear witness and testimony against all such as do in these lands 7where ,god has given his people a claim of another kind7 professedly dwell under such a shadow4 ,but besides1 the ,presbytery view them 7complexly considered7 as unworthy of their regard or notice in these papers1 as to engaging in any particular or explicit testimony against them1 in as much as they have denuded themselves of almost any pretense to the ,presbyterian name1 by not only disclaiming and opposing the true ,presbyterian cause1 but having also fallen from the belief and profession of the most important and fundamental truths of ,christianity2 thereby plainly discovering themselves to be creatures of quite another species and spirit1 than the ministers of ,jesus ,christ1 and friends to the blessed spiritual ,bridegroom2 deserving rather to be termed a synagogue of ,libertines1 a club of ,socinians1 ,arians1 ,pelagians c41 banded together against ,christ1 and the doctrines of his cross than a synod of the ministers of the gospel4 ,therefore1 as the presbytery testify and remonstrate against them1 their toleration1 or indulgence footing1 on which they professedly stand1 together with their poisonous jumble and medley of errors1 commonly called ,newlight1 adopted1 and with the greatest warmth and diligence1 spread and propagated by most of them1 and connived at and tolerated by the rest and all their books or prints written by them1 or others of the like spirit with them in defense of these dangerous and damnable tenets so they do hereby judicially warn and exhort all the people under their inspection there1 to beware of such men1 and such books1 however they may varnish over the doctrines they bring1 with fine words fair speeches and pretenses1 in order to deceive the hearts of the simple2 and this1 as they would not incur the displeasure of a holy and jealous ,god1 and have their souls defiled and destroyed by these error's4 ,on the contrary to endeavor to have their minds and understandings enlightened with the knowledge of the truths of ,christ1 and mysteries of his gospel1 and their hearts warmed with the love of them2 so that being through grace established in the belief of the truth1 they may not be as children tossed to and fro1 and carried about with every wind of doctrine1 by the sleight of men1 and cunning craftiness1 whereby they lie in wait to deceive2 ,eph4 iv1 #ad1 #ae4 ,but speaking the truth in love may grow up in all things unto him1 which is the ,head even ,christ2 and striving to refrain and keep themselves from every wicked1 offensive and backsliding course1 and to live soberly1 righteously and godly1 blameless and harmless as the sons of ,god1 without rebuke1 adorning the gospel of ,christ with a conversation becoming the same2 so shall they thereby glorify ,god1 and transmit a faithful testimony for the despised truths of ,christ to posterity1 that so there may be a seed to do service unto him in these lands1 and make his name to be remembered through all generations4 ,,part ,,iii4 ,the principles of some parties1 who have made the most specious appearances for the ,reformation1 considered4--,particular grounds of testimony against that body of ministers and people known by the name of the ,secession1 wherein their partiality and unfaithfulness in their profession of the covenanted testimony of the ,church of ,scotland is discovered in various instances1--their loose and immoral doctrine about civil society and government--their corruption in worship1 sinful terms of communion1 c41 c4 ,the ,presbytery having in the preceding pages exhibited their testimony against both church and state1 as now established in these isles of the sea1 and therein discovered the reasons1 why they are obliged to disapprove of both1 proceed1 next1 to take notice of some of the parties that have made the most specious appearances for reformation in this land since the ,revolution1 of which that party commonly known by the name of the ,secession1 are not the least remarkable4 ,it is vast pity1 and it is with grief and lamentation1 that the ,presbytery find themselves1 in point of duty1 obliged to lift up a testimony against the forementioned party2 considering1 that they have made a professed appearance under a judicial banner displayed for truth1 and a covenanted work of reformation1 and have1 in reality1 showed much zeal in opposing a variety of errors in doctrine1 corruption in discipline and government1 most prevalent in the national ,church of ,scotland2 have contributed to vindicate some of the most important truths and doctrines of the ,christian faith1 that have been openly impugned in this day of blasphemy1 and may have been instrumental in turning many to righteousness1 and reviving the exercise of practical godliness among not a few4 ,but as ,paul withstood ,peter to the face1 and testified against his dissimulation1 though both of them apostles of our common ,lord and ,savior2 so it still remains duty to testify against the most godly1 and such as may have been very useful to the church in many respects1 in so far as they have not showed themselves earnest contenders for the faith once delivered to the saints1 but have dealt treacherously with ,god in the concerns of his glory4 ,it is therefore with just regret they proceed to observe1 that they are obliged1 to testify against this party designated1 first1 by the title of ,the ,associate ,presbytery 7and then that of ,the ,associate ,synod7--and that particularly1 for their error in doctrine1 treachery in covenant1 partiality and tyranny in discipline and government4 ,it may at first seem strange1 to see a charge of error advanced against those who made the countenancing of error in the judicatories of the established church1 one principal ground of their secession therefrom4 ,but by taking a narrower view of the principles and doctrines which they have roundly and plainly asserted1 and endeavored to justify in their printed pamphlets anent civil government1 the reception and belief of which they zealously inculcate upon their followers1 it will appear1 that their scheme is so far from tending to promote the declarative glory of ,god1 and the real good of human and religious society1 or the church of ,god1 which are the very ends of the divine ordinance of magistracy1 that it is not only unscriptural1 but anti-scriptural1 contrary to the common sentiments of mankind1 and introductive of anarchy and confusion in every nation1 should it be thoroughly adopted1 and therefore ought to be testified against4 ,the sum of their principles anent civil magistracy1 may be collected from these few passages1 to be found in a print entitled1 ,answers by the ,associate ,presbytery to reasons of dissent1 c4--,page #gj4 ,this divine law1 not only endows men in their present state with a natural inclination to civil society and government1 but it presents unto them an indispensable necessity of erecting the same into some form1 as a moral duty1 the obligation and benefit whereof no wickedness in them can lose or forfeit4--,page #gd4 ,whatever magistrates any civil state acknowledged1 were to be subjected to throughout the same4--,page #ej4 ,such a measure of these qualifications 7viz41 scriptural7 and duties cannot be required for the being of the lawful magistrate's office1 either as essential to it1 or a condition of it sine qua non3 ,i4 ,it cannot be required as essential thereunto2 for then it would be the same thing with magistracy1 which is grossly absurd1 and big with absurdities4 ,in the next place1 it cannot be a condition of it sine qua non1 or1 without which one is not really a magistrate1 however far sustained as such by civil society2 for then no person could be a magistrate1 unless he were so faultlessly4 ,the due measure and performance of scriptural qualifications and duties belong not to the being and validity of the magistrate's office1 but to the well-being and usefulness thereof4--,p4 #hg4 ,the precepts1 already explained1 are a rule of duty toward any who are1 and while they are acknowledged as magistrates by the civil society4 ,nothing needs be added for the clearing of this1 but the overthrow of a distinction that has been made of those that are acknowledged as magistrates by the civil society1 into such as are so by the preceptive will of ,god1 and such as are so by his providential will only2 which distinction is altogether groundless and absurd3 ,all providential magistrates are also preceptive1 and that equally in the above respect 7viz41 as to the origin of their office7 the office and authority of them all1 in itself considered1 does equally arise from1 and agree unto the preceptive will of ,god4--,p4 #hh4 ,the precepts already explained 7,prov4 xxiv1 #ba2 ,eccl4 x1 #d2 ,luke xx1 #be2 ,rom4 xiii1 #a-h2 ,tit4 iii1 #a2 #a ,pet4 ii1 #ac-ah71 are a rule of duty equally toward any who are1 and while they are acknowledged as magistrates by the civil society2 they are1 and continue to be a rule of duty in this matter1 particularly1 to all the ,lord's people1 in all periods1 places1 and cases4 ,these few passages1 containing the substance of ,seceders' principles on the head of civil government1 may be reduced to the following particulars3 #a4 ,they maintain the people to be the ultimate fountain of magistracy1 and that as they have a right to choose whomsoever they please to the exercise of civil government over them2 so their inclinations1 whether good or bad1 constitute a lawful magistrate1 without regard had to the divine law4 #b4 ,that the law of ,god in the scriptures of truth1 has no concern with the institution of civil government1 but only adds its precept in forcing obedience upon the conscience of every individual1 under the pain of eternal damnation1 to whomsoever the body politic shall invest with the civil dignity2 and that1 without any regard to the qualifications of person or office4 #c4 ,whomsoever the primores regni1 or representatives of a nation1 do set up1 are lawful magistrates1 and that not only according to the providential1 but according to the preceptive will of ,god also1 in regard that ,god1 the supreme governor1 has prescribed no qualifications in his word1 as essential to the being of a lawful magistrate1 nor told what sort of men they must be1 that are invested with that office over his professing people1 though it is confessed there are many that are necessary to the well-being and usefulness of that office3 and therefore1 #d4 ,that no act1 or even habitual series of the greatest wickedness and mal-administration can forfeit the person's right to the people's subjection1 for conscience sake1 considered as individuals1 while the majority of a nation continue to recognize and own his authority4 ,the absurdity of this scheme of principles may obviously appear at first view to every unbiassed mind that is blessed with any competent measure of common sense and discretion1 and tolerable knowledge of divine revelation4 ,that magistracy is a divine ordinance1 flowing originally from ,jehovah1 the supreme and universal ,sovereign of ,heaven and earth1 as the ultimate fountain thereof1 cannot be denied4 ,neither is it to be doubted1 but that the ,lord has lodged a power and right in the people1 of choosing and setting up those persons that shall exercise civil government over them1 and to whom they will submit themselves4 ,but then1 while ,god has lodged this power in the people1 of conveying the right of civil authority to their magistrates1 he has at the same time given them positive and unalterable laws1 according to which they are to proceed1 in setting up their magistrates2 and1 by the sovereign authority of the ,great ,lawgiver1 are they expressly bound to act in agreeableness to these rules1 without any variation1 and that1 under the pain of rebellion against him1 who is ,king of kings1 and ,lord of lords4 ,the ,presbytery1 therefore1 testify against this scheme of ,seceding principles1 calculated1 in order to inculcate a stupid subjection and obedience to every possessor of regal dignity1 at the expense of trampling upon all the laws of ,god1 respecting the institution1 constitution1 and administration of the divine ordinance of magistracy4 ,particularly1 this opinion is1 #a4 ,contrary to the very nature of magistracy1 as described in the scriptures of truth1 where we are taught1 that all authority to be acknowledged of men1 must be of ,god1 and ordained of ,god4 ,the divine ordination of magistracy is the alone formal reason of subjection thereto1 and that which makes it a damnable sin to resist4 ,so the apostle teacheth1 ,rom4 xiii1 #a1 c43 ,there is no power but of ,god2 the powers that be1 are ordained of ,god4 ,not only is it the current sentiment of orthodox divines upon the place1 but the text and context make it undeniably evident1 that by power here1 is understood1 not a natural1 but a moral power1 consisting not only in an ability1 but in a right to command4 ,which power is said to be ordained of ,god1 as importing1 not merely the proceeding of the thing from ,god providentially1 but such a being from ,god1 as carries in it his instituting or appointing thereof1 by the warrant of his word1 law1 or precept4 ,so that that power which is to be owned as of ,god1 includes these two particulars1 without which1 no authority can be acknowledged as ,god's ordinance1 viz41 institution and constitution1 so as to possess him1 who is ,god's minister1 with a moral power4 ,in the divine institution of magistracy is contained1 not only the appointment of it1 but the defining the office in its qualifications and form1 in a moral sense1 prescribing what shall be the end1 and what the measure of its authority1 and how the supreme power shall rule and be obeyed4 ,again1 the constitution of the power1 or the determination of the form1 and investiture of the particular person with the government1 is of ,god3 hence our ,savior1 ,john x1 #ce1 in his application of these words in the ,psalms1 ,i said1 ye are gods1 to magistrates1 shows how they were gods1 because unto them the word of ,god came2 that is1 by his word and warrant he authorized them2 his constitution is passed upon them1 who are advanced by men1 according to his law in his word4 ,when therefore a nation acts according to divine rule1 in the molding of government1 and advancing of persons to the exercise of it2 there the government and governors may be said to be ordained of ,god4 ,but that government that is not consonant to the divine institution1 and those governors1 that are not advanced to the place of supreme rule1 in a ,christian land1 by the people1 regulating themselves by the divine law1 cannot be said to be the powers ordained of ,god4 ,it is not merely the conveying the imperial dignity by men unto any particular person1 that constitutes the power to be of ,god2 but because1 and in so far as this is done by virtue of a warrant from ,god and in agreeableness to his law that the action has the authority of ,god upon it4 ,hence1 if in this matter there is a substantial difference from1 or contrariety to the divine rule1 then there is nothing but a contradiction to ,god's ordinance3 this must needs be granted1 unless it is maintained that ,god has wholly left the determination of this ordinance to men1 absolutely and unlimitedly1 giving them an unbounded liberty to act therein1 according to their own pleasure1 which is most absurd4 ,from the whole1 it follows1 that more is requisite than the inclinations of any people1 to constitute a lawful magistrate1 such as can be acknowledged ,god's ordinance4 ,that power which in its institution and constitution is of ,god1 by his law1 can alone challenge subjection1 not only for wrath1 but for conscience sake4 #b4 ,the ,presbytery testify against this scheme of principles1 as being anti-scriptural1 and what1 in its tendency1 is destructive to the authority of the sacred oracles4 ,seceders maintain1 that the people1 without regard to scriptural qualifications1 have an essential right to choose whom they please to the exercise of civil government1 and that whomsoever they choose are lawful magistrates2 and thus make the great ordinance of magistracy dependent on the uncertain and corrupt will of man4 ,but that this annarchical system is not of divine authority1 but owes its origin to their own invention1 appears from the following texts of holy writ1 besides others1 ,exod4 xviii4 #ba3 ,moreover1 thou shalt provide out of all the people1 able men1 such as fear ,god1 men of truth1 hating covetousness2 and place such over them to be rulers4 ,this counsel of ,jethro1 was ,god's counsel and command to ,moses1 in the choice of magistrates1 supreme and subordinate2 and discovers1 that people are not left to their own will in this matter4 ,it is ,god's direction1 that the person advanced to rule1 must be a man in whom is the spirit2 ,numb4 xxvii1 #ah2 which ,deut4 xxxiv1 #i1 interprets to be the spirit of wisdom1 7i4e47 the spirit of government1 fitting and capacitating a man to discharge the duties of the magistratical office1 to the glory of ,god and the good of his people2 without this1 he ought not to be chosen4 ,deut4 i1 #ac3 ,take ye wise men and understanding1 and known among your tribes1 and ,i will make them rulers over you4 ,here is a precept1 directing the people in their choice3 they must not be children nor fools2 if so1 they are plagues and punishments1 instead of scriptural magistrates1 who are always a blessing4 ,and they must be men of known integrity and affection to the real welfare of ,israel1 not such as are known to be haters of1 and disaffected to the ,israel of ,god4 ,again1 the express law of the king1 is1 that he must be one of the ,lord's chosing2 ,deut4 xvii4 #ad1 #ae3 ,when thou art come unto the land which the ,lord thy ,god giveth thee1 and shalt possess it1 and shalt dwell therein1 and shalt say1 ,i will set a king over me1 like as all the nations about me3 thou shalt in anywise set him king over thee1 whom the ,lord thy ,god shall choose3 one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee1 thou mayest not set a stranger over thee1 who is not thy brother4 ,here1 though ,christians have a right to set a king over them1 yet1 it is evident1 they are not left at liberty to choose whom they please1 but are1 in the most express and positive terms1 limited and circumscribed in their choice to him1 whom the ,lord their ,god shall choose3 and this divine choice must certainly be understood 7in a large sense7 of a person of such a character1 temper of mind1 and qualifications1 as ,god pointed out to them in his law1 particularly in the text before cited 7for whatever ,god's word approves of and chooses1 that ,god himself chooses74 ,and in the text before1 as the person is further described1 both negatively and positively1 he must be a brother2 which relation is not to be confined to that of kindred or nation1 but especially respects religion4 ,he must not be a stranger and enemy to the true religion1 but a brother1 in respect of a cordial embracing1 and sincere profession 7so far as men can judge7 of the same cause of religion1 and so one1 of whom it may be expected that he will employ his power and interest to advance the kingdom of ,jesus ,christ4 ,this precept respects the office1 and points at the very deed of constitution1 and in the most positive manner1 restricts not only the people of the ,jews1 but every nation blessed with the light of divine revelation1 in their setting up of civil rulers1 pointing forth on whom they may1 and on whom they may not confer this honorable office4 ,the same truth is confirmed by #b ,sam4 xxiii1 #b1 #c1 #d3 ,the spirit of the ,lord spake by me--the ,god of ,israel said1--he that ruleth over men must be just1 ruling in the fear of ,god4--,so ,job xxxiv1 #ag1 #ah3 ,shall even he that hateth right govern8--,is it fit to say to a king1 ,thou art wicked8 and to princes1 ,ye are ungodly8 ,in which words1 while ,elihu is charging ,job with blasphemy1 in accusing ,god of injustice1 declaring that if he made ,god a hater of right and impeached him of injustice1 he did1 in effect1 blasphemously deny his government1 universal dominion and sovereignty in the world4 ,it is not only supposed1 but strongly asserted and affirmed1 that he that hateth right should not govern4 ,again1 #a ,cor4 vi1 #a1 #d1 #e3 ,if then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life1 set them to judge--,is it so1 that there is not a wise man among you8 no1 not one that is able to judge between his brethren8 ,all these texts1 which are plain1 positive1 moral precepts1 whereby ,god hath set boundaries about his own ordinance2 that it be not corrupted by men1 as they demonstrate what magistrates ought to be1 and prove that they cannot be of ,god's ordaining who have not these qualifications3 so they evince1 that scriptural qualifications are nothing less necessary and essential to the being of a lawful scriptural magistrate1 than the consent of the people2 and consequently1 do sufficiently overturn this anti-scriptural scheme4 ,seceders indeed grant1 that ,god hath declared his will1 concerning the choice of magistrates in the above1 and such like precepts2 but1 from their granting these scriptural qualifications to be only advantageous to those that have them1 and necessary to the well-being and usefulness of lawful magistrates1 and at the same time denying them to be necessary to the being thereof2 it necessarily follows1 as the consequence of their sentiments1 that they allow civil society a negative over the supreme ,lawgiver in this matter2 and in so doing1 exalt the will and inclination of the creature above the will of the ,creator1 which is the very definition of sin4 ,say they in the fore-quoted pamphlet1 page #hjth1 ,it is manifest1 that the due measure and performance of scriptural qualifications and duties1 belong not to the being and validity of the magistrate's office1 but to the well-being and usefulness thereof4 ,how easy is it here to turn their own artillery against themselves1 and split their argument with a wedge of its own timber8 ,for if1 as is granted1 scriptural qualifications are essential to the usefulness of the magistrate's office1 they must also be necessary to the being thereof1 otherwise it is in itself quite useless4 ,and if in itself useless1 with respect to the great ends thereof1 without the due measure of scriptural qualifications1 it cannot then be the ordinance of ,god1 in regard it must not be supposed1 that a ,god of infinite wisdom and goodness1 who does nothing in vain1 has instituted an ordinance for the good of his people1 in subserviency to his glory1 which yet1 in itself 7as to its being and essence71 is useless1 and of no profit nor advantage to them4 ,and as for their comparison of the magistrate's office to other common and ordinary places and relations among men1 the parallel will not hold1 no not for illustration1 far less for a proof of their doctrine4 ,nor is there any comparison1 unless they can prove1 that ,god in his word has as plainly and positively required men to be so and so qualified1 before it is lawful for them to enter into1 or for others to put them in such places and relations1 as he has done1 with regard to magistracy4 ,this is indeed the scope and end of their whole scheme1 to derogate from1 degrade and lessen the dignity of this great ordinance of magistracy1 allowing it no more than what is common to men in general1 in other inferior states and ordinary business of life1 alleging1 ,that these qualifications 7which they grant ,god has prescribed in his word7 are only advantageous to them that have them2 and that at the hazard of evidently opposing and contradicting the intention of the ,spirit of ,god1 in the above texts of scripture1 which imply a specialty1 and particular appropriation to kings and rulers in their office4 ,again1 this principle either1 as above said1 denies magistracy to be ,god's ordinance instituted in his word2 or then says1 that he hath instituted ordinances in his revealed will1 without prescribing any qualifications as essential to their being1 but entirely left the constitution of them to the will of man4 ,but how absurd is this1 and derogatory to the glory of ,god1 in all his perfections1 who is a ,god of order1 once to imagine1 that he hath set any of his ordinances1 either as to matter or manner1 upon the precarious footing of the pure will of wicked and ungodly men8 ,the smallest acquaintance with divine revelation will readily convince1 that he hath not4 ,it may as well1 and with the same parity of reason1 be refused1 that there are any qualifications requisite1 as essential to the being and validity of the office of the ministry1 but only necessary to its well-being and usefulness2 and therefore1 is as lawful 7in its exercise7 in the want of these qualifications1 as the ordinance of magistracy is accounted to be4 ,but how contrary is this to scripture1 ,tit4 i1 #g1 #h2 #a ,tim4 iii1 #b1 #c1 #d1 #e1 #f1 #g1 c4 ,now1 comparing these with the above-cited texts1 respecting the qualifications of magistrates1 it appears1 that the qualifications of the magistrate are required in the same express and as strong terms 7if not also somewhat more clearly17 as the qualifications of the minister2 and seeing a holy ,god hath made no difference1 as to the essentiality of the qualifications pertaining to these distinct ordinances1 it is too much presumption for any creature to attempt doing it4 ,both magistrate and minister are1 in their different and distinct spheres1 clothed with an equal authority from the law of ,god1--have subjection and obedience equally1 under the same pains1 required to them respectively1 7as ,deut4 xvii4 #i to #ac2 #b ,chron4 xix1 #e to #aa2 ,heb4 xiii1 #ag1 c47--and the qualifications of both1 as above1 stated and determined with equal peremptoriness1 making them no less essential to the being and validity of the one than the other4 ,and this being the case1 it is not easy to understand how ,seceders will reconcile their principles anent civil government1 with their principle and practice1 in separating from an established church or ministry1 whose constitution they acknowledge to be good2 and who being presbyterially ordained1 are also still countenanced by the body of the people4 ,sure1 had they dealt fairly1 honestly and impartially in the matters of ,god1 they would have acted in this case agreeably to their declared principle1 page #gith of their pamphlet1 viz43 ,the passages holding forth these qualifications and duties of magistrates1 do not by the remotest hint imply1 that1 if in any wise they be deficient in1 or make defection from the same1 their authority and commands1 even in matters lawful1 must not be subjected unto and obeyed1 c4 ,certainly1 according to this1 all the deficiencies1 defections1 and mal-administrations in the church1 could never have been a warrantable ground 7which yet they make the only ground7 of their separation from her4 ,but on the contrary1 they should still have continued in communion with her1 and subjection to her in matters lawful1 in a way of testifying against the same1 and essaying their reformation1 by all means that were habile for them4 ,seceders must either grant1 that such was their duty1 and so of themselves condemn their separation as unwarrantable2 or else deny1 that the qualifications of the magistrate and minister are required in the same express terms in scripture2 that both are clothed with an equal 7though distinct7 authority2 and that subjection and obedience are under the same pains enjoined to both1 and consequently say1 that it is less dangerous to cast off1 contemn and disregard the authority of a church1 than that of the state2 while yet 7according to their scheme7 civil authority is entirely resolved into1 and depends purely upon the changeable will of civil society4 ,but1 it is presumed1 they will allow1 that ecclesiastical authority is derived1 and flows from1 and depends entirely upon the ,lord ,jesus ,christ alone1 the glorious ,judge1 ,lawgiver1 and ,king of his church2 so that 7according to them7 this being of a far more noble extract and original1 it must be of far more dangerous consequence1 to contemn and cast off it1 than the other4 ,again1 as this doctrine gives unto men a negative over the ,holy ,one of ,israel1 it also opens a wide door for introducing and enforcing the cause of deism1 already too prevalent3 for1 if all who are set up by civil society1 however wicked1 and void of the qualifications ,god has required1 while they are acknowledged and submitted to by their constituents1 must be equally regarded as ,god's ordinance1 with those who have those qualifications2 then it will follow1 that the corrupt will of wicked men legitimates the magistrate's office and authority1 not only without1 but in contradiction to the preceptive will of ,god2 and what is this 7absit blasphemia71 but to exalt man above ,god1 in giving unto the universal ,sovereign and ,supreme ,lawgiver1 only a consultative power in the constitution of magistracy1 while it ascribes unto man an absolute and definitive power1 whereby they have power to receive or reject the law of ,god 7at least respecting magistracy7 at pleasure1 and their deed of constitution be equally valid1 when opposite1 as when agreeable unto1 and founded upon his righteous law4 ,and sure1 by the same reason1 that man may take a liberty to dispense with the authority of ,god1 in one point of his commanding will2 he may also in another1 until at last every part of it is rejected4 ,it is but a contempt of the same authority1 and he that offends in one point1 is guilty of all4 ,such are the absurdities that this their scheme leads to1 though it is hoped the authors do not intend so4 ,it may here be only necessary further to observe1 that among the other desperate shifts ,seceders are driven to in defense of their favorite notion1 they say1 that scriptural qualifications cannot be essential to ,god's ordinance of magistracy1 or necessarily required as a condition of it sine qua non2 for then it would be the same thing with magistracy2 nor can these qualifications be the condition 7sine qua non1 or71 without which one could not be a magistrate2 for then it would be necessary1 that every one were possessed of them faultlessly1 before he could be owned as a lawful magistrate2 either of which they allege would be grossly absurd4 ,but this plausible and fair-set argument of theirs1 if it prove any thing1 will prove more than it is supposed they themselves will grant1 and consequently proves nothing at all4 ,for the same gross absurdity may1 with equal reason1 be inferred from a maintaining1 that a due measure and performance of scripture qualifications and duties are essential to any other of ,god's ordinances1 and so that these are the ordinance itself4 ,for instance1 they might as well reason 7as some have justly observed already71 that scriptural qualifications are not essential to a lawful gospel minister1 for then it would be the same thing with the ministry1 itself2 nor can it be a condition1 without which one is not really a minister1 unless he were so faultlessly4 ,and thus they have at once stripped1 not only all of the race of ,adam1 that ever exercised that office1 but themselves also1 of any real mission1 as ministers1 unless they have assumed the ,pope's infallibility1 and are advanced to the ,moravian perfection4 ,so1 although the scripture declares it essential to the true church1 that she hold the head1 yet by their childish reasoning1 this would infer a conclusion big with absurdities1 even that this qualification of a true church1 is the church itself4 ,and1 in like manner1 it can no longer be admitted1 that faith in ,christ1 and holiness1 are essential to the being of a true ,christian2 for that would be to make faith the same thing with a ,christian1 and would infer1 that as in heaven only holiness is in perfection1 so there alone ,christians are to be found4 ,upon the whole1 as the ,lord has given an indispensable law1 respecting the constitution of kings1 showing what conditions and qualifications are required of them2 it undeniably follows1 as an established truth1 that ,christianized nations must invest none with that office1 but in a way agreeable to that law1 and those alone according to scripture1 are magistrates of ,god's institution1 who are in some measure possessed of these qualifications4 ,it is therefore an anti-scriptural tenet1 that nothing is requisite to constitute a lawful magistrate1 but the inclinations and choice of the civil society4 #c4 ,the ,presbytery testify against this system of principles1 because it has a direct tendency to destroy the just and necessary distinction that ought to be maintained between the perceptive and providential will of ,god1 and necessarily jumbles and confounds these together1 in such a manner1 as a man is left at an utter uncertainty to know when he is accepted and approven of ,god in his conduct1 and when not4 ,that this is the scope of their principles1 is confessed1 p4 #hg1 of their book of principles3 ,nothing needs be added say they for the clearing of this1 but the overthrow of a distinction that has been made of those who are acknowledged as magistrates by civil society1 into such as are so by the preceptive will of ,god1 and such are so by his providential will only2 which distinction is altogether groundless and absurd4 ,it will not be refused1 that all such preceptive magistrates are also providential4 ,but1 moreover1 all such providential magistrates are also preceptive4 ,the office and authority of them all1 in itself considered1 does equally arise from1 and agrees to the preceptive will of ,god4 ,a doctrine most shocking in itself6 ,how strange6 that ,christians1 from any consideration1 will obstinately maintain a favorite opinion1 which is confessedly built upon1 and cannot be established but at the expense of blending and confounding the preceptive and providential will of ,god1 while the distinction thereof is clearly and inviolably established in the word of ,god6 ,although divine providence1 which is an unsearchable depth1 does many times1 and1 in many cases1 serve as a commentary to open up the hidden mysteries of scripture revelation2 yet1 where the law of ,god in the scriptures of truth is silent1 there providence regulates not1 is neither institutive1 nor declarative of ,god's will to be done by us2 and where the said divine law does ordain or deliver a rule to us in any case1 there providence gives no relaxation1 allowance or countermand to the contrary4 7,see ,gee on magistracy1 in his excellent discourse on providence47 ,that an overthrow of this necessary distinction1 for the sake of the above dangerous scheme1 cannot be admitted of1 in a consistency with a due regard to the authority of revealed religion1 and that therefore the right and lawfulness of magistracy is not founded upon the providential will of ,god1 though they are countenanced and supported by the majority of a nation1 will partly appear from the following considerations3 #a4 ,if there is no distinction to be made between the preceptive and providential will of ,god1 then is providence equally in all respects the rule of duty1 as much as the precept is1 and so man should be left at an utter uncertainty1 what is duty1 in regard of the opposition that is many times between providential dispensations and the precept4 ,nay1 then it is impossible that man can be guilty of sin1 in transgressing the divine will1 because ,god infallibly brings to pass1 by his holy and over-ruling providence1 whatever he has decreed by his eternal purpose4 ,rom4 ix1 #ag4 ,and thus the ,jews1 in murdering the ,son of ,god1 should be acquitted from the charge of guilt1 and could not be said to transgress the divine will4 #b4 ,if no distinction is to be made between the preceptive and providential will of ,god1 but providence is declarative of the precept1 then is providence a complete rule without the written word4 ,and this at once supersedes the necessity of divine revelation1 and derogates from the sufficiency and perfection of the scriptures of truth4 ,the written word is affirmed to be perfect3 ,psal4 xix1 #g4 ,sinners are reproved for doing that which the word gave no command for1 ,jer4 vii1 #ca1 and xix1 #e2 and challenged for following the promising appearances3 ,isa4 xxx4 #a1 #b1 #c1 #aa4 ,it is therefore daring presumption to set up providence for a rule in opposition to the written law of ,god4 ,hence it must be concluded1 either that the preceptive will of ,god in the scriptures is imperfect1 or the laws therein repealable by providence2 or then that providence cannot be the rule of human actions4 #c4 ,if the distinction between the preceptive and providential will of ,god is to be overthrown1 then providence must be expressive of ,god's approbative ordination1 equally as his revealed will is4 ,for1 without this 7viz4 the divine approbation71 there can be no lawful title to what is possessed4 ,but this is what providence of itself cannot do2 it cannot without the precept discover either ,god's allowance or disallowance4 ,if then this distinction is denied1 and the providential will of ,god asserted to be declarative of his preceptive1 and so of his approbative will2 it remains to be manifested1 where and how it has been appointed of ,god for such an end1 an end that is by the ,spirit of ,god denied unto it3 ,eccl4 ix1 #a1 #b1 #d4 ,if this distinction is to be overthrown1 then either the providential will of ,god1 without any regard to the precept1 in every case1 and in every sort of tenure1 gives a just and lawful right and title2 or ,god has declared in his word that it shall be so in the matter of civil government only1 viz4 that whosoever gains the ascendancy in the inclinations of the people1 by whatever sinful methods this is obtained1 it matters not1 and so is by the hand of providence raised up above all his rivals to the regal dignity1 he is the lawful magistrate1 ,god's ordinance according to his precept4 ,the first cannot be said2 it were impious to suppose it2 for that would justify all robberies and violences1 and legitimate every fraud2 not the latter1 for where is it to be found in all the book of divine revelation1 that ,god hath made such a law touching magistracy8 ,but how big with absurdities1 to say1 that a holy ,god has given to man a plain and positive law to be his governing rule in every particular that concerns him1 this of magistracy only excepted4 ,in this great ordinance he hath wholly left him to be guided1 or rather misled and bewildered by his own corrupt inclinations3 but the contrary of this has been in part discovered1 and may further4 #e4 ,if1 in order to establish their anti-government scheme1 the foresaid distinction is to be destroyed1 and all such as are providential powers1 and acknowledged by man1 are also preceptive1 and therefore to be submitted to for conscience sake1 then are the kingdoms of men necessarily obliged to own and submit unto the dominion of the devil4 ,the devil not only claims to himself the possession of the power of all the kingdoms of this world1 but it is certain that of the most of them he still retains an actual predominancy1 hence styled the god of this world4 ,now1 it cannot be refused1 but that the power he exercises is providential 7or a power of permission72 and it is most certain1 that it is with the consent and good will of all the children of men1 while in a natural state4 ,but are men therefore obliged to acknowledge his authority1 or submit to that providential power he maintains over them8 ,if every providential power is also preceptive1 the answer must be given in the affirmative4 ,the like may be said of the ,pope of ,rome1 the devil's captain-general1 to display his hellish banner against the ,king of kings1 and ,lord of lords1 with respect to those nations where he is acknowledged in his diabolical pretensions4 ,it can be to no purpose for ,seceders to allege that the ,pope claims a power unlawful in itself1 and therefore cannot be owned1 in regard the person whom they make a pretended acknowledgment of1 as their lawful sovereign1 is by the act of his constitution invested with a similar power1 a power both civil and ecclesiastical1 and declared to be head of the church1 as well as the state4 ,nothing1 therefore1 remains for them1 but either to acknowledge this clear distinction between the providential and preceptive will of ,god1 or then profess the lawfulness of both the above mentioned powers4 #f4 ,if the foresaid distinction is too big with absurdities to be received1 and if the authority of all providential magistrates does equally arise from1 and agree unto the precept1 then it would be no sin to resist the powers ordained of ,god1 provided that providence proves auspicious and favorable to the rebel1 and advances him to the throne1 with the good will of his fellow rebellious subjects1 by expelling the lawful sovereign2 at least such resistance could not be determined to be sinful1 until once the event declared1 whether providence would countenance the treasonable attempt or not4 ,thus what the apostle declares a damnable sin1 ,rom4 xiii1 #b1 must be justified and made the foundation of subsequent duty1 if patronized by a multitude4 ,this they evidently maintain1 as appears from their declaration of principles1 page #hb1 where1 pretending to obviate some difficulties anent their principles1 arising from the people of ,god's disowning anti-scriptural magistrates3 ,the whole nature of any simple revolt say they lies in breaking off immediately from the civil body1 by withdrawing from1 or withdrawing part of their territories2 and then it necessarily follows at the same time1 that these revolters break off from the head of the civil body1 without ever denying his authority over the members who still cleave unto the same4 ,this1 in connection with their grand foundation principle1 and the scope of their discourse at the above citation1 discovers that they grant1 that if the whole civil society should reject the authority they had set up 7however agreeable it should have been to the preceptive will of ,god1 and should again set up another1 though never so opposite thereto71 their doing so would be lawful2 but it is not lawful for a few to disown any authority 7however wicked and anti-scriptural71 unless they can at the same time withdraw from1 or withdraw part of his territories4 ,nothing can be more absurd than to say1 that a people are bound by the laws of ,god to give subjection for conscience sake1 and yet at the same time are at liberty to cast off and reject the same authority at pleasure4 ,if the magistrate be lawful1 it is utterly unlawful to reject him2 an attempt to divest him of his office1 power and authority1 though carried on by the primores regni1 is rebellion against ,god4 ,it is most ridiculous to allege1 that a people considered as a body politic1 are not under the same obligation to their rightful sovereign1 as when they are considered as individuals1 but may lawfully reject him1 and set up another1 if they please2 so that he who one day is ,god's minister1 next day hath no title to that office1 but if he claim it1 must be treated as a traitor1 whereby all security that can possibly be given to the most lawful magistrate1 is at once destroyed4 ,thus1 if the ,chevalier had succeeded in his late attempt1 had gained the favor of the primores regni1 and thereby mounted the ,british throne2 ,seceders must then1 of necessity1 either have quit their present principles1 or then have subjected to his yoke for conscience sake1 under the pain of eternal damnation4 ,his being a professed ,papist1 and enslaved vassal of ,rome1 could not have warranted them to leave their place of subjection to him while owned by the civil society1 and so they must have treated the present powers as usurpers and enemies to government1 though they now flatter them with the pretensions of an ill-grounded loyalty4 ,again1 how absurd and self contradictory to grant1 that a minor part may not only revolt1 but also withdraw part of a prince's territories2 and yet that the same party may not1 when residing in the nation1 refuse to acknowledge the lawfulness of an anti-scriptural power4 ,this is to say1 that people are no longer obliged to submit to authority1 than they are in capacity to withdraw from1 or withdraw part of their prince's territories from him1 and so to justify their rebellion1 by that which can only be a terrible aggravation of their sin4 ,these1 with a number of other absurdities1 natively flow from a denial of the distinction between the providential and preceptive will of ,god1 making the title of the lawful magistrate depend solely upon the will of the people4 ,nothing is more evident than this1 that if the inclinations of the people1 exclusive of all other qualifications1 constitute a lawful magistrate1 then 7though he rules ever so agreeable to ,god's preceptive will71 so soon as this body 7though in a most unjust and tyrannical manner7 casts him off1 he that moment for ever loses all title and claim to the office1 and can no longer be regarded as a lawful magistrate4 ,a principle that in its nature and tendency is introductive of all anarchy and confusion1 and with the greatest propriety deserves the encomium of the anti-government scheme4 #g4 ,this anarchical system of principles1 which destroys the above just and necessary distinction1 is directly in opposition to the laudable and almost universal practice of all nations1 in ordaining and enacting certain fundamental laws1 constitutions and provisos1 whereby the throne is fenced1 the way to it limited1 and the property thereof predisposed4 ,the ,scripture sufficiently discovers those restrictions and rules1 which ,god himself has prescribed and laid down1 for directing and determining of his people's procedure about the erection of magistrates4 ,and profane history abounds in discovering certain fundamental laws and conditions to take place1 almost in every nation1 without conforming to which1 none can be admitted to that dignity over them4 ,but to what purpose are any such laws and constitutions1 if this vague principle is once admitted1 which cancels and disannuls all such provisos and acts8 ,why should ,moses have been so solicitous about his successor in the government of ,israel1 ,numb4 xxvii1 #ae-ag1 if ,god had ordained the inclinations of the people alone should determine8 ,or to what purpose did ,israel1 after the death of ,joshua1 ask of ,god1 who should be their leader1 if their own inclinations alone were sufficient to determine it8 ,if ,god has declared1 that the corrupt will of the people is the alone basis of civil power1 then1 not only are all state constitutions and fundamental laws useless1 because1 on every vacancy of the throne1 they not only must all give place to the superior obligation1 the incontrollable law1 of the uncertain inclinations of the body politic1 but they are in their nature unlawful2 their proper use in every nation being to prevent all invasion upon the government by unqualified persons1 and to illegitimate it1 if at any time done4 ,so that1 if the consent of civil society is the only essential condition of government which ,god has authorized1 not only are all scriptural conditions and qualifications useless and unlawful1 but also all human securities1 either from intruders or for lawful governors1 are unlawful1 in regard the very design of them all is to oppose this grand foundation principle1 the jure-divinity of which ,seceders have found out1 and do confidently maintain4 ,and thus1 by the seceding scheme1 is condemned1 not only the practice of almost all other nations1 determining by law1 some indispensable qualifications that their rulers must have2 but particularly the practice of these once reformed lands1 when reformation had the sanction1 not only of ecclesiastic1 but also of civil1 authority1 is hereby condemned4 ,scripture and covenant qualifications were then made essential to the being of a lawful magistrate1 by the fundamental laws and constitutions of the nations2 so that however the inclinations of the people might run 7as it soon appeared they were turned in opposition to these71 yet1 by these laws1 and in a consistency with that constitution1 none could be admitted to the place or places of civil authority1 but such as professed1 and outwardly practiced1 according to reformation principles4 ,see ,act #aeth1 ,sess4 #b;d1 ,parl4 #afdi4 ,and how happy we had been1 if we had constantly acted in conformity to these agreeable laws1 experience1 both former and latter1 will bear witness4 ,how much better had it been for us to have walked in ,god's statutes1 and executed his judgments1 than by our abhorrence of them1 and apostasy from them1 to provoke him to give us statutes that are not good1 and judgments whereby we cannot live 7,ezek4 xx1 #be71 or have any comfortable enjoyment and possession of the blessings and privileges of his everlasting gospel1 as it is with us at this day4 ,and yet1 this is what ,seceders would have us caressing1 embracing and 7with them7 blessing ,god for1 under the notion of a present good2 and so bless ,god for permitting his enemies 7in anger against an ungrateful and guilty people7 to overturn his work and interest1 and establish themselves upon the ruins thereof2 to bless him for making our own iniquities to correct us1 and our backslidings to reprove us1 until we know what an evil and bitter thing it is to depart from the ,,lord ,,god of our fathers2 to bless him 7for what is matter of lamentation7 that the adversaries of ,zion are the chief1 and her enemies prosper1 ,lam4 i1 #e3 and all this abstractly1 under the notion1 of good1 which comes very near the borders of blasphemy4 ,but1 moreover1 the civil settlement at the revolution is also condemned by this principle of theirs2 not because of its opposition to a covenanted reformation1 but in regard it includes some essential qualifications required in the supreme civil ruler4 ,the nations are1 by that deed of constitution1 bound up in their election of a magistrate2 and all ,papists1 such as marry with ,papists1 or do not publicly profess the ,protestant religion1 are declared incapable of the throne4 ,so that we see the present law makes some other qualifications1 besides the consent of the body politic1 essential to the constitution of a lawful sovereign in ,britain4 ,from all which it is plain1 that this principle of ,seceders is neither a reformation nor a revolution principle2 let then the impartial world judge whence it came4 ,seceders1 in consequence of their contradictory and self-inconsistent system of principles1 declare they cannot swear allegiance to a lawful government4 ,they maintain the present to be lawful1 yet 7in ,dec4 of their principles1 page #eeth7 they say1 ,the question is not whether it be lawful for us to swear the present allegiance to the civil government1 which the ,presbytery acknowledge they cannot do1 seeing there are no oaths to the government in being1 but what exclude the oath of our covenants1 and homologate the united constitution4 ,but seeing they acknowledge that every constitution of government1 that comprehends the will and consent of civil society1 were it as wicked and diabolical as can be imagined1 is lawful--yea1 as lawful as any that is most consonant to the preceptive will of ,god1 having all the essentials of his ordinance2 and seeing1 because of the will and consent of the people1 they own the present to be lawful1 it is most surprising why they cannot swear allegiance to it2 their reasons cannot1 in a consistency with their principle1 be sustained as valid4 ,that the present oaths of allegiance and the oath of the covenants are inconsistent1 is readily granted2 but seeing the oaths of allegiance bind to nothing more than what they confess they are bound to for conscience sake1 namely1 to own the lawfulness of the government1 and to maintain it according to the constitution thereof 7which is a duty owed by subjects to every lawful sovereign72 and seeing that whatever is in the oaths of allegiance contrary to the covenants1 does not flow from them1 abstractly considered1 but from the constitution to which they bind 7which constitution is sanctified by the people's acknowledgement of it74 ,if1 therefore1 the covenants forbid a duty1 to which they are bound for conscience sake1 their authority in that ought not to be regarded4 ,but certainly ,seceders1 who have found it duty to alter and model the covenants1 according to the circumstances of the times they live in1 might have found it easy work to reconcile the oath of the covenants with allegiance to a lawful government4 ,the other part of their reason is no less ridiculous and self-contradictory1 viz41 ,they cannot swear allegiance to the present government1 because it homologates the united constitution4 ,but is not this constitution according to the will1 and by consent of1 the body politic8 and is it not ordained by the providential will of ,god8 therefore1 according to them1 has all the essentials of a lawful constitution1 which claims their protection1 under pain of damnation4 ,how great the paradox6 they cannot swear allegiance1 because they would bind them to acknowledge and defend a lawful constitution4 ,is not active obedience1 is not professed subjection for conscience sake1 an homologation of the constitution8 ,certainly they are1 and that not in word only1 but in deed and in truth4 ,and what is the allegiance1 but a promise to persevere in what they do daily1 and what they hold as their indispensable duty to do8 ,to grant the one1 then1 and refuse the other1 is1 in effect1 to homologate or acknowledge the constitution1 and not to acknowledge it1 at the same time1 which is a glaring absurdity4 ,but here1 they would have people attend to their chimerical distinction between the king's civil and ecclesiastical authority4 ,they have made a successless attempt 7in order to establish their antigovernment scheme7 for the overthrow of a distinction1 which ,heaven has irreversibly fixed1 between the preceptive and providential will of ,god2 and1 for the same purpose1 they will impose this distinction on the generation--a mere shift and artifice1 which has no foundation nor subsistence any where else1 but in their imagination1 and serves for no purpose but to cheat their own and others' consciences1 and betray the cause of ,god4 ,it is plain1 that as a power1 both civil and ecclesiastical1 belongs to the essence and constitution of an ,english diocesan bishop1 so the same is declared to belong now to the essence and constitution of an ,english king1 who is the head and chief prelate among them all2 and it is their manner to call themselves his bishops 7not ,christ's71 as having their power1 both ecclesiastical and civil1 immediately from him1 as the fountain of all power within his dominions ,so that there is no room for this distinction of ,seceders here1 unless they are such expert logicians1 as to distinguish a thing from that which is essential to it1 and so from itself2 but this is a destruction1 not a distinction4 ,seceders indeed presume and depend very much upon their abilities of this kind2 for they can distinguish between the magistrate's office and its essential qualifications1 which ,god has inseparably joined together in his word4 ,they can distinctly pray for the head1 author1 authorizer and prime supporter1 of abjured ,prelacy and ,prelates1 that ,god would bless him in his government1 and yet not pray for the ,prelates themselves4 ,they can pray very fervently and distinctly for the ,british and ,irish parliaments1 and yet not at all pray for the bishops1 necessary and essential members there4 ,and what is all this but to pray for a nonentity1 a mere creature of their own mind8 ,they have neither king nor parliament in their abstracted and imaginary sense1 but do clearly distinguish themselves out of both4 ,we might refer them to that famous and faithful embassador1 and renowned martyr for the cause and testimony of ,jesus1 ,mr4 ,donald ,cargill1 in his last speech and testimony1 and let him determine the controversy 7in this particular7 between us4 ,they will not be so bold as to say1 that this honorable witness died with a lie in his right hand4 ,his words are these3 ,as to the cause of my suffering1 the main is1 not acknowledging the present authority as it is now established4 ,this is the magistracy ,i have rejected1 that was invested with ,christ's power2 and seeing that power taken from ,christ1 which is his glory1 and made the essential of the crown1 ,i thought it was as if ,i had seen one wearing my husband's clothes1 after he had killed him4 ,and seeing it is made the essential of the crown1 there is no distinction we can make1 that can free the conscience of the acknowledger from being a partaker of this sacrilegious robbing of ,god4 ,and it is but to cheat our conscience1 to acknowledge the civil power1 for it is not the civil power only1 that is made the essential of the crown4 ,and seeing they are so express1 we must be plain2 for otherwise1 it is to deny our testimony1 and consent to his robbery4 ,from these words it is evident1 first1 that ,mr4 ,cargill was no ,seceder1 or of their mind1 in this particular2 and second1 that1 at the time1 there were some who did cheat and impose upon their own consciences1 by distinguishing 7where there was no room for distinction7 between the king's civil and ecclesiastical authority--which distinction was condemned and testified against by all who were truly faithful to ,christ and their own consciences1 and tender of his honor and glory1 by their unanimous rejection of that anti-christian and unlawful power2 and that when they had much more reason and temptation to fly to such a subterfuge for their safety1 than ,seceders now have4 ,and1 third1 from these words it is also clear1 that ,mr4 ,cargill and that poor1 distressed and persecuted people that adhered to him1 rejected and disclaimed the then authority1 not so much because of their tyranny and mal-administrations1 as on account of the unlawfulness and wickedness of the constitution itself 7which was the prime original and spring of all the wickedness in the administration71 namely1 because the king arrogantly and sacrilegiously assumed to himself that power1 which was the sole and glorious prerogative of ,jesus ,christ4 ,and as to the difference that ,seceders make between that and the present time 7since the revolution71 it is certain1 that whatever greater degree of absolute supremacy was then assumed by ,charles ,,ii1 it does not vary the kind of that claimed1 or rather conferred on and exercised1 by the supreme powers1 since the revolution 7for majus et minus non variant speciem71 nor acquit them of the guilt of robbing the ,son of ,god1 ,jesus ,christ1 of his incommunicable prerogative and supremacy in and over his church1 as the only king and head thereof4 ,nor will the difference of times1 while the constitution remains the same1 while ,god remains the same1 and truth and duty remain the same1 nor yet any distinction that can be made1 free the conscience of the acknowledger1 more now than then1 from being a partaker 7art and part7 with the civil power1 in this sacrilegious robbery4 ,psal4 l1 #ah3 ,when thou sawest a thief1 then thou consentedst with him1 c4 ,but passing this3 seeing the above mentioned reasons1 which ,seceders allege why they cannot swear allegiance to the present government1 which they assert is lawful and scriptural1 cannot be sustained1 some others must be sought for them3 and they may be either1 because they judge allegiance itself unlawful2 or rather1 because then they would be bound by oath to continue faithful to this government in all changes that can happen4 ,whereas now1 they are free1 and equally ready1 in a full consistency with their principles1 to profess their subjection to another1 were it even a popish pretender4 ,for according1 to them1 an infidel or papist may have a just and lawful authority over us1 notwithstanding all1 both the reformation and revolution laws1 to the contrary4 ,if1 therefore1 the legislature would1 in the oaths of allegiance1 insert this limitation1 viz4 so long as the body politic is pleased to acknowledge the supreme magistrate1 they would find it easier to come over their other pretended and inconsistent difficulties4 ,for the truth is1 they cannot1 in a consistency with their anti-government scheme1 and with safe consciences1 swear to any government1 but with such limitation1 in regard they cannot be sure1 but he that is now owned by civil society may be rejected1 and another set up1 who must be acknowledged4 ,so they would be brought into an inextricable dilemma2 either they must own them both to be ,god's ordinance1 which is absurd2 or then be perjured1 by rejecting him to whom they had sworn2 or then incur damnation1 by refusing obedience to him1 who is set up by the body politic4 ,such is the labyrinth of confusion and contradiction this anarchical system leads into2 a system that cancels all constitutions by ,god and men anent civil government4 #h4 ,this anti-government ,seceding principle1 destructive of said distinction between the providential and preceptive will of ,god1 is both contrary to1 and confuted by many approven scriptural examples2 in which the ,spirit of ,god testifies1 that the actual possession of the throne1 under the favor of providence1 and by the consent of a majority of a nation1 may be in one1 while the moral power and right of government is in another4 ,the word of ,god acknowledges ,david the rightful sovereign over all ,israel1 for the space of forty years 7#a ,kings1 ii1 #aa2 #a ,chron4 xxix1 #bf1 #bg72 seven of these he is said to have reigned in ,hebron1 and thirty-three in ,jerusalem4 ,during the first seven years of his reign at ,hebron1 there is a positive confinement of his actual rule to the tribe of ,judah only2 #b ,sam4 v1 #e4 ,and at the same time1 ,ishbosheth is said to be made king over all ,israel1 and to have reigned two years4 ,in agreeableness to ,seceding principles1 there is no reconciling these different texts4 ,according to their scheme ,david can with no propriety be said to have reigned forty years over all ,israel1 seeing seven of the years were elapsed before he was actually acknowledged by all ,israel1 before providence put him in the actual possession of all that extensive power4 ,there is another known example1 applicable to the present purpose1 in the instance of ,david1 during the rebellion of his unnatural son ,absalom4 ,according to the sacred story1 #b ,sam4 chap1 xv1 xvi1 xvii1 xviii1 xix1 it appears1 that he was wholly ejected1 both out of the hearts and territories of ,israel1 and not only the throne1 but the will and consent of the people given up to ,absalom4 ,but was ,david therefore divested of his right and title8 ,though it is most contrary to scripture to suppose it2 yet1 according to ,seceders1 seeing ,absalom was king1 by possession of the throne1 and had not only the power providentially put into his hand1 but had it also by the consent of the people2 it necessarily follows that ,absalom1 being a providential magistrate1 his office and authority did equally arise from1 and agree to the preceptive will of ,god1 and subjection and obedience1 for conscience sake1 was equally due to him1 as to ,david1 by the ,israelitish tribes4 ,and so it was a damnable sin in ,david to fight against him1 as it could be no less than a resisting the ordinance of ,god4 ,the same may be said with respect to that other revolt1 by the instigation1 and under the conduct of ,sheba2 #b ,sam4 chap4 xx4 ,but although1 according to ,seceders1 he must also have been their lawful magistrate1 the ,spirit of ,god discovers the reverse1 still acknowledging the right of government in all these changes to be in ,david4 ,another example is in the case of ,solomon1 who was ordained or designed by ,god expressly for the kingdom of ,israel4 ,adonijah had obtained the ascendancy1 both in respect of actual possession1 and the inclinations and consent of the majority of the nation2 the consent was general2 #a ,kings1 i1 #e1 #g1 #i1 #aa1 #ah1 #be1 and ii1 #ae4 ,he had all to plead for himself1 which ,seceders make essential to the constitution of a lawful king4 ,he had got to the throne by providence1 and had full admission and possession1 by the inclinations of the people4 ,if then there is no distinction to be made of those who are acknowledged by civil society1 into such as are so by the preceptive will of ,god1 and such as are so by his providential will only--then ,solomon had no right nor title to the crown2 and the enterprise of ,david and ,nathan1 c41 of setting him on the throne1 was utterly unlawful4 ,both they and ,solomon ought to have acquiesced in the duty of subjection to ,adonijah1 as being the ordinance of ,god4 ,but this would have been opposite to the express direction of the ,lord1 appointing the kingdom to ,solomon1 ,it was his from the ,lord1 as ,adonijah himself confessed4 ,to the same purpose might be adduced1 the instance of ,joash1 the son of ,akaziah1 who was king de jure1 even when ,athaliah had not only the countenance of providence1 but the consent of the people1 in the possession of the kingdom2 #b ,chron4 xxii1 #aj1 #ab4 ,again1 the practice of nations1 in owning those for their lawful sovereigns1 who1 by providence1 were put from the actual exercise of their rule and authority1 contributes to confute this absurd notion4 ,thus1 the people of ,israel1 who had risen up for ,absalom1 do even1 when ,david was out of the land1 own him for their king4 ,so1 during the ,babylonish captivity1 there are several persons noted as princes of ,judah1 whom the people owned1 as having the right of government over them4 ,with a variety of other instances1 all discovering1 in opposition to their anarchical system1 that it is not by the dispensations of providence1 that the right and title of the lawful magistrate is to be determined4 ,moreover1 as the ,associate ,presbytery have so barefacedly belied the scriptures of truth1 as to assert that there cannot be so much as an instance found in all the history of the ,old ,testament1 of any civil members refusing1 either by word or deed1 an acknowledgment of1 or subjection unto the authority of any magistrate actually in office1 by the will of the civil body3 besides what have been already adduced1 take these few following examples of many4 ,after that ,saul1 by his disobedience to the commandment of the ,lord1 had forfeited his title to the kingdom1 he was no more honored as king1 by ,samuel1 the prophet2 but1 on the contrary1 he openly testified to his face1 that the ,lord had rejected him from being king2 #a ,sam4 xv1 #bf-ce4 ,though he mourned over him as one rejected1 yet he no more acknowledged him as clothed with the authority as a lawful king2 nay1 the ,lord having rejected him1 reproves his prophet for mourning for him1 #a ,sam4 xvi1 #a4 ,from which1 and the command he received to anoint ,david in his stead1 and that even while the civil society did acknowledge1 and was subject unto ,saul1 it appears1 that the throne of ,israel was then regarded1 both by the ,lord and his prophet1 as vacant1 until ,david was annointed2 from which time1 in the eye of the divine law1 he was the rightful king1 and ought1 in consequence of the public intimation made by the prophet of ,saul's rejection1 to have been acknowledged as the ,lord's ,anointed by the whole kingdom of ,israel4 ,in agreeableness whereto1 the scripture informs1 that not only ,david in expectation of the ,lord's promise1 resisted ,saul as an unjust usurper1 but many among the tribes of ,israel1 whom the ,spirit of ,god honorably mentions1 rejected the government of ,saul1 and joined themselves to him that was really anointed of the ,lord2 #a ,chron4 xii1 #a-bc4 ,now1 if the ,lord did command1 under pain of damnation1 to give loyal obedience to all in the place of supreme authority1 however wicked1 while acknowledged by the body politic1 he would not reject such1 nor command to set up others in their room1 nor approve of those who disowned and resisted them4 ,but all this is done in this instance1 which of itself1 is sufficient to overthrow their scheme4 ,another instance is in #b ,chron4 xi1 #ac1 #af1 where the authority of ,jeroboam is rejected and cast off1 even when acknowledged and submitted to by the nation of ,israel1 by the priests and ,levites1 and after them1 by all such as did set their hearts to seek the ,lord ,god of ,israel1 through all the ten tribes2 and this1 because of his abominable wickedness4 ,whereby it appears a commendable duty to refuse the lawfulness of the authority of wicked occupants1 though acknowledged by the majority of a nation4 ,a similar example there is in the reign of ,baasha1 who could not by all his vigilance prevent many from casting off his government2 #b ,chron4 xv1 #i4 ,again1 there is an express example of ,elisha's disowning the king of ,israel1 even when the civil society owned him2 #b ,kings1 iii1 #ad1 #ae4 ,he did not regulate his conduct by providence1 and the will of the people1 but1 in opposition to both1 refused him that honor that is due to all that are really kings4 ,to these may be added that notable example of ,libnah1 a city of the priests1 who could not but have knowledge by the law of their ,god what was their duty2 #b ,chron4 xxi1 #aj4 ,here is an instance of a people's casting off allegiance to a king1 properly because of his apostasy and intolerable wickedness1 whereby they bore testimony against him1 and discovered what was the duty of the whole nation1 on account of his apostasy from the ,lord4 ,their so doing was a most positive1 actual and express condemnation1 both of ,jehoram for his wickedness1 and of the people for concurring1 joining with him1 and strengthening his hands in it 7even as ,noah by his faith and obedience is said to have condemned the antediluvian world2 ,heb4 ix1 #g47 ,and this their conduct and testimony the ,spirit of ,god justifies1 and records to their honor4 ,these few of many that might be adduced1 declare the impudence1 as well as fallacy and imposture of ,seceders in this matter1 and also justify the principles which they maliciously nick-name the anti-government scheme2 and that for no other reason1 but because it establishes the ordinance of magistracy among a people favored by ,god with divine revelation1 upon his preceptive will1 in opposition to their anarchical notions of setting it wholly upon the tottering basis of the corrupt will of man4 ,and1 to conclude this particular1 how ridiculously absurd is it in them to insinuate1 that1 in the examples above1 or others to be found in sacred history1 those persons did1 notwithstanding their own practice in rejecting the authority of wicked rulers1 still view it as the duty of the rest of the nation1 to acknowledge them8 ,this is pure jargon and nonsense1 contrary both to reason and religion4 ,by what law could the opposite practices of those that disowned1 and those that still continued to own the authority of unlawful rulers1 be justified8 ,it could not by the divine law1 which never condemns that as sin in one1 which it approves as duty in others in the same circumstances4 ,seeing therefore these1 in the instances above1 are justified1 the practice of those who continued to acknowledge the lawfulness of these wicked rulers1 must be regarded as condemned1 both by the divine law1 and also by the practices of the above persons1 which do all jointly concur in witnessing1 that they viewed it the duty of all the rest of the nation1 to have done as they did4 ,and from the whole1 it appears a commendable duty for the ,lord's people to disown the right and lawfulness of rulers set up in contradiction to the divine law4 #i4 ,the iniquity of attempting to destroy the necessary distinction between the providential and preceptive will of ,god in the matter of magistracy1 appears from ,god's express disallowance of some whom providence had actually exalted to the supreme command over a people2 ,ezek4 xxi1 #bg3 ,i will overturn1 c4 ,although this may have an ultimate respect to ,christ1 yet it has also a reference to the rightful governors of ,judah1 when disposessed of their right by the providential will of ,god4 ,and here the ,lord threatens the execution of his judgments upon the unjust possessor4 ,see also ,amos vi1 #ac2 ,hab4 ii1 #e1 #f2 ,nah4 iii1 #d1 #e2 and ,matth4 xxvi1 #eb4 ,by all which it appears1 that the supreme lawgiver states a real difference between those who are only exalted by the providential will of ,,god1 and not authorized by his preceptive will2 and therefore it is impossible that the office and authority of them both can equally arise from1 and agree to the precept4 ,again1 in ,hos4 viii1 #d1 ,they have set up kings1 but not by me2 they have made princes1 and ,i knew it not1 is this distinction showed1 as with the brightness of a sun-beam1 so that he that runs may read it4 ,the ,,lord by his prophet here charges this people with horrid apostasy1 in changing both the ordinances of the magistracy and the ministry1 particularly1 although the ,,lord commanded1 if they would set up kings1 they should set up none but whom he chose2 ,deut4 xvii1 #ae4 ,yet they had no regard to his law4 ,this charge seems to have respect to the civil constitution among the ten tribes after their revolt from the house of ,david2 not simply charging their revolt on them1 but that after their secession1 they did not consult ,,god1 nor act according to his precept1 in their setting up of kings4 ,as nothing can happen in the world1 but by the course of providence2 and as all things are known unto ,,god1 in respect of his omniscience1 the text cannot respect either of these4 ,the true import of the charge then is1 they have set up kings1 but not according to the law and preceptive will of ,,god2 and therefore he neither did nor would approve either them or their kings4 ,hence the prophet charges this as one cause of their national destruction4 ,here then it is undeniably evident that ,,god himself establishes that distinction pleaded for2 and it is therefore most wicked to assert1 as ,seceders do1 that it is altogether groundless and absurd4 ,again1 this text discovers1 that all kings that are set up and acknowledged by civil society1 are not agreeable to the preceptive will of ,,god1 or1 as such1 approven by him1 as they have falsely asserted3 for here the ,,lord declares1 that ,israel had set up kings that were not agreeable to his precept3 and the charge respects their authority1 the very deed of constitution4 ,to say then1 that all providential magistrates are also preceptive1 is directly to give the ,,god of truth the lie4 ,moreover1 this plainly intimates1 that all such providential magistrates as are not set up in agreeableness to the precept2 are disallowed and condemned by ,,god1 and therefore ,,god commands to put away the carcasses of such kings1 as1 because of the blind consent of civil society1 were little better than adored by the people1 ,ezek4 xliii1 #i1 that he might dwell in the midst of them forever2 and therefore he declares it the sin1 and so the cause of the people's ruin1 as in the above text3 and also in ,hos4 v1 #aa1 ,ephraim is oppressed2 because he willingly walked after the commandment1 deliberately and implicitly followed every wicked ruler set up by civil society4 ,it is but a perverting and abusing the above text1 to plead that it is only a condemnation of ,israel1 for not consulting the ,,lord in making choice of their kings1 but no condemnation of them for setting them up1 and acknowledging them1 in contradiction to the ,,lord',s choice1 as plainly laid before them in his preceptive will4 ,and it is very contradictory1 to acknowledge it a sin1 not to consult ,god1 and yet to assert that it is a matter of indifference as to the validity of their office1 whether his counsel be followed or not1 which it must be1 if1 as their principle bears1 the being of the magistrate's office and authority is equally good and valid1 when contrary1 as when agreeable to the commanding will of ,god4 ,but if1 as is granted1 it be a sin not to consult ,god in the choice of magistrates1 it must needs be a great aggravation thereof1 after consulting him1 to reject and contemn his counsel1 and openly contradict his positive command1 by constituting kings in opposition to his declared will1 which is evidently the sin charged upon ,israel1 and the reason why he disclaims all such2 and therefore1 according to that known and approven rule1 that wherever any sin is forbidden and condemned in scripture1 there the contrary duty is commanded and commended2 it follows1 that the setting up of rulers1 in opposition to the express command of ,god1 being here condemned1 the contrary duty is commended1 namely1 a disowning of all such rulers2 for1 if it be a sin to set up rulers1 and not by ,god1 it must also be a sin to acknowledge them when so set up1 in regard it is a continuing in1 and approving of the sin of that wicked erection2 although such an acknowledgment may indeed be agreeable to their principle1 which gives to the creature a prerogative above the ,creator4 ,from the whole it may already appear1 what reason the ,presbytery have for testifying against ,seceders1 for maintaining such a corrupt doctrine2 a doctrine1 which they very justly acknowledge 7p4 #hg7 cannot be established1 but by the overthrow of this distinction between the providential and preceptive will of ,god2 a distinction1 that as they shall never be able to overturn by all their impotent and impious attacks3 so it will to all ages stand as a strong bulwark1 inviolably defending the truth here contended for by the ,presbytery4 #d4 ,the ,presbytery testify against this anti-government principle of the ,secession1 as being contradictory to1 and inconsistent with the reformation principles1 and covenanted obligations1 whereby these nations1 in agreeableness to the law of ,god1 bound themselves to maintain all the ordinances of ,god in their purity1 according to their original institution in the scriptures of truth4 ,the ,seceding scheme 7as has been noticed formerly7 is1 that whomsoever the bulk of the nation1 or body politic1 set up1 and providence proves auspicious and favorable to1 is the lawful magistrate1 to be owned and submitted to for conscience sake4 ,the inconsistency of which tenet with reformation principles1 may appear from viewing and comparing therewith the coronation oath1 ,james ,,vi1 ,parl4 #a1 cap4 #h1 where it is ordained as a condition sine qua non1 that all kings1 princes1 and magistrates1 shall at their installment solemnly swear to maintain the true religion of ,jesus ,christ1 and oppose all false religions4 ,so also ,james ,,vi1 ,parl4 #a1 cap4 #ith1 which ordains1 that no person may be a judge or member of any court that professes not the true religion4 ,also ,charles ,i1 ,parl4 #b1 sess #b;d1 ,act4 #ad1 it is ordained1 that before the king be admitted to the exercise of his royal power1 he shall give satisfaction to the kingdom anent the security of religion3 and so the same parliament1 ,act #aeth1 #afdi1 express themselves 7referring to the coronation oath above mentioned73 ,the estates of parliament judging it necessary1 that the prince and people be of one perfect religion1 appoint1 that all kings and princes1 who shall reign or bear rule within this realm1 shall at the receipt of their princely authority1 solemnly swear to observe in their own persons1 and to preserve the religion1 as it is presently established and professed4 ,and they ordain1 that before the king's majesty who now is1 or any of his successors1 shall be admitted to the exercise of his royal power1 he shall1 by and attour the foresaid oath1 declare by his solemn oath1 under his hand and seal1 his allowance of the ,national ,covenant1 and of the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 and obligation to prosecute the ends thereof in his station and calling2 and that he shall consent1 and agree to acts of parliament1 enjoining the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 and fully establishing ,presbyterian government1 the ,directory for worship1 ,confession of ,faith1 and ,catechisms approved by the ,general ,assembly of this kirk1 and parliament of this kingdom--and that he shall observe these in his own practice and family1--and shall never make opposition to any of these1 or endeavor any change thereof4 ,likeas1 the estates of parliament discharge all the lieges and subjects of this kingdom to procure or receive from his majesty any commissions or gifts whatsoever1 until his majesty shall give satisfaction1 as said is1 under the pain of being censured in their persons and estates1 as the parliament shall judge fitting4 ,and if any such commissions or gifts be procured or received by any of the subjects before such satisfaction1 the parliament declares and ordains all such and all that shall follow thereupon1 to be void and null4 ,and the same session1 ,act #bfth1 it is in short ordained1 that none shall bear any place of public trust in the nation1 but such as have the qualifications ,god requires in his word4 ,thus1 in the prefatory part of the act1 they say1 ,the estates of parliament taking into consideration1 that the ,lord our ,god requires that such as bear charge among his people1 should be able men1 fearing ,god1 hating covetousness1 and dealing truly3 and that many of the evils of sin and punishment1 under which the land groans1 have come to pass1 because hitherto they have not been sufficiently provided and cared for1 c4 7,and afterward in the statutory part71 ,do therefore ordain1 that all such as shall be employed in any place of power and trust in this kingdom1 shall not only be able men1 but men of known affection unto1 and of approved fidelity and integrity in the cause of ,god1 and of a blameless ,christian conversation1 c4 ,to the same purpose1 ,act #aath1 ,parl4 #b;d1 ,sess4 #c;d1 entitled act for purging the army4 ,see also the coronation oath1 of ,scotland1 as subscribed by ,charles ,,ii1 at ,scoon1 #afej4 ,all which1 and many other fundamental laws of the like nature1 made in time of reformation1 show the principles of our reformers to have been quite different from those of ,seceders anent civil government3 and that to constitute lawful magistrates1 they must of necessity have scriptural and covenant qualifications1 besides the consent of the people4 ,with what face then can they pretend to have adopted a testimony for reformation principles1 and to be of the same principles with our late reformers8 ,the vanity of this pretense will further appear1 by comparing their principles with the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 with every article of which they are inconsistent4 ,they profess the moral obligation of the covenants1 and yet at the same time maintain the lawfulness of every providential government1 whether popish or prelatic1 if set up by the body politic4 ,but how opposite this to the first article1 obliging constantly to endeavor the preservation of the reformed religion8 ,can it be consistent therewith1 to commit the government of the nations to a sworn enemy to the reformation8 or1 with that sincerity which becomes the professors of ,christ1 to plead the lawfulness of an authority raised upon the overthrow of the reformed religion8 ,no less opposite is it to the second article1 which obliges1 and that without respect of persons1 to endeavor the extirpation of popery1 prelacy--to maintain and plead for the lawfulness of that which establishes or supports prelacy or popery in the nations4 ,this appears rather like a sincere endeavor in them to promote whatever is contrary to sound doctrine1 and the power of true godliness2 and that1 because an apostate people approves thereof1 contrary to ,exod4 xxiii1 #b3 ,thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil4 ,again1 the third article binds to preserve the rights of parliaments1 and the liberties of the kingdoms1 and the king's authority in the preservation and defense of the true religion4 ,but how inconsistent is it therewith1 to own and defend an authority that in its constitution and habitual series of administration1 is destructive of all these precious and valuable interests8 ,it is full of contradiction1 and a mocking both of ,god and the world1 to pretend to own and defend the destroyers of the true religion1 in the defense of religion1 as ,seceders do in their mock acknowledgment of such as are sworn to maintain ,prelacy1 in opposition to the reformed religion4 ,the contradictoriness of this principle of theirs to the fourth article1 needs no illustration4 ,again1 the owning of an authority1 which is reared up and stands upon the footing of the destruction of the covenanted union1 and uniformity of the nations in religion can never be consistent with the fifth1 article1 which binds1 to an endeavoring1 that these kingdoms may remain conjoined in that firm covenanted union to all posterity4 ,in like manner1 as the sixth article obliges to a defending of all that enter into that ,league and ,covenant1 and never to suffer ourselves to be divided1 and make defection to the contrary part2 it must be a manifest contradiction thereto1 not only to defend such as are enemies to that covenant1 but even in their opposition thereto4 ,and it is a making defection to the contrary part1 and from that cause and covenant with a witness1 to plead the lawfulness of the national constitution1 which is established upon the ruins of a covenanted work of reformation1 as ,seceders do2 whose principle and practice1 in opposition to what is professed in the conclusion of the covenant1 as well as what was the very design of entering into it1 is1 instead of a going before others1 in the example of a real reformation1 a corrupting of the nations more and more1 and going before them in the example of a real apostasy and defection from the reformation1 so solemnly sworn to be maintained in this covenant2 and a teaching of them to appoint themselves a captain1 to return to their anti-christian bondage4 ,upon the whole1 as the ,presbytery ought to testify against this new scheme of principles1 respecting the ordinance of magistracy2 they therefore1 upon all the grounds formerly laid down1 did1 and hereby do declare1 testify against1 and condemn the same1 as what is1 indeed1 a new and dangerous principle1 truly anti-government1 introductory of anarchy and confusion1 of apostasy and defection from the covenanted work of reformation1 the principles by which it was carried on and maintained1 and acts and laws1 by which it was fenced and established2 and what is flatly opposite to1 and condemned by the word of divine revelation1 in many express and positive precepts1 and approven examples1 agreeable thereto1 as well as by our solemn national covenants1 founded upon1 and agreeable to the said word of divine revelation4 ,and finally1 let this be further observed1 that as it was a beautiful branch of our glorious reformation1 that the civil government of this nation was modeled agreeable to the word of ,god2 and that the right of regal government was constituted1 bounded and fixed by an unalterable law1 consonant to the word of ,god1 and sworn to be inviolably preserved both by king and people3 so the ,associate ,brethren1 by their doctrine on this head1 which is inconsistent with our uncontroverted establishment1 and fundamental laws1 excluding from the throne all papists and prelatists1 have counteracted a most important point of the covenanted reformation1 and opened a wide door to ,jacobitism4 ,for1 if every one is bound to acknowledge implicitly any government1 in fact1 that prevails3 then1 if a party in these nations should rise up1 and set a popish pretender on the throne1 according to their doctrine1 all should be obliged to subject to him2 and it would be sinful to impugn the lawfulness of his authority1 although that1 by being popish1 he is destitute of the essential qualifications required of a king1 not only by the word of ,god1 but by the national constitution and laws1 in order to make him a lawful sovereign to these nations4 #b4 ,the ,presbytery testify against the ,associate ,presbytery1 now called ,synod1 for their wronging1 perverting and misapplying the blessed scriptures of truth in many texts1 in order to support their erroneous tenet3 namely1 that the word of ,god requires no qualifications as essential to the being of a lawful ,christian magistrate3 but that whosoever are set up1 and while they continue to be acknowledged by civil society1 are lawful magistrates1 though destitute of scripture qualifications1 and acting in a manifest opposition to the revealed will and law of ,god4 ,the texts of scripture used by them1 do prove this general proposition1 viz41 ,that it is the duty of the people of ,god to obey and submit to lawful rulers in their lawful commands3 and that it is utterly unlawful and sinful to oppose such lawful authority4 ,but none of these texts quoted by them1 prove1 that it is the duty of the people of ,god1 blessed with the knowledge of his revealed will1 to submit to1 and obey1 for conscience sake1 an authority that is sinful1 and opposite to the revealed will of ,god1 both in its constitution and general course of administration4 ,nor do they prove1 that a prelatical1 ,erastian or popish government1 is a lawful government1 either expressly1 or by right of necessary consequence1 over a people1 who either do1 collectively considered as a church and nation1 or are bound to profess all the parts of the true religion1 and to maintain all the divine ordinances in their purity3 nor do they prove1 that any can be lawful rulers over these ,christian and covenanted nations1 who want the essential qualifications required by the word of ,god1 the covenants1 and fundamental laws of the kingdoms3 or that it is sinful in the people of ,god1 to say so much1 in testifying against the joint and national apostasy from ,god and the purity of religion4 ,particularly1 ,the first text they adduce is1 ,prov4 xxvi1 #ba3 ,my son1 fear1 thou the ,lord and the king1 and meddle not with them that are given to change4 ,it is granted1 that this scripture enjoins all those duties that1 in a consistency with the fear of the ,lord1 a people owe to their rightful kings4 ,but nothing can be more absurd1 than to extend the command to all that bear the name of kings1 who are acknowledged by a nation as kings1 and while they do so own them1 though their constitution should be most anti-christian1 and they justly chargeable with unparalleled evils not only in their private character1 but in their public conduct3 be they idolaters1 adulterers1 blasphemers1 sabbath-breakers1 murderers1 invaders1 and avowed usurpers of the throne1 crown and scepter1 and incommunicable prerogatives of ,christ1 the glorious ,king of ,zion1 setting themselves in the temple of ,god1 and exalting themselves above all that is called ,god1 by dispensing with his laws1 and1 in place thereof1 substituting their own wicked laws1 whereby they establish iniquity1 and enjoin1 under severe penalties1 the profanation of the name1 day and ordinances of the ,lord4 ,this command must certainly be understood in a consistency with the duty and character of one that is resolved to be an inhabitant of the ,lord's holy hill1 ,psal4 xv1 ,in whose eyes a vile person is contemned4 ,it must be consistent with the fear of the ,lord1 which can stand very well with a fearing and honoring all who are really kings2 but a flat contradiction thereto1 to fear every vile person1 because it is the will of civil society to set him up in the character of king4 ,till therefore ,seceders prove1 either that kings are under no obligation to obey the law of ,god themselves1 and so not liable to its sanction and penalty1 in case of disobedience2 or then1 that the favor and approbation of civil society can justify a dispensing with the law of ,god1 they will never be able to prove from this1 nor any other text1 that such as are guilty of any crime declared capital in the word of truth have a right and title to that fear1 honor and obedience1 that is due to lawful kings1 even though they are acknowledged by civil society4 ,and so this text makes nothing for1 but against their darling tenet2 and their explication thereof is evidently a wresting of scripture1 making it speak in their favor1 contrary to the scope and meaning of the ,holy ,spirit therein4 ,and their inviduous insinuation1 that all who differ from their opinion1 do likewise depart from the fear of the ,lord1 is but a further evidence of their abuse of scripture1 while it is at the same time utterly false4 ,see ,mr4 ,knox's history1 p4 #dbb1 #ast ,book of ,discipline1 cap4 #aj1 #aa4 ,a second text abused1 for supporting their forementioned principle1 is ,eccles4 x1 #d3 ,if the spirit of the ruler rise up against thee1 leave not thy place1 for yielding pacifieth great offenses4 ,as formerly1 so here they assert1 that this text refers to any rulers presently acknowledged by the civil society1 and that the rising of the ruler's spirit must be understood as groundless1 and so sinful1 and necessarily comprehends any wrath or wrong that a subject may meet with unjustly at the ruler's hand1 upon personal or religious accounts4 ,that yet1 notwithstanding1 the subject 7in the use of lawful endeavors for his own vindication7 must continue in subjection and obedience to the ruler1 in lawful commands1 while the civil state continues to acknowledge him2 and this1 as the only habile mean of convincing the ruler of his error1 and preventing further evils4 ,but1 as the reason which they there allege1 does not necessarily conclude and prove this rising of spirit in the ruler to be sinful2 so the whole of their application and gloss built upon it1 is invalidated2 and1 moreover1 is a condemnation of the principles and practice of our reformers1 and sufferers for the cause and truths of ,christ1 in the late times1 when they left their place of subjection1 and took up arms in defense of their religion1 liberties and lives4 ,their explication is also self inconsistent2 for1 if this rising of spirit necessarily comprehends any wrath or wrong1 on personal or religious accounts1 then there must be a yielding1 or keeping the place of subjection1 not only in lawful commands1 but in all matters1 whether lawful or not2 otherwise1 this yielding cannot be supposed to answer the end designed4 ,for though a subject should yield in all other particulars1 yet1 unless he also yield in that particular1 on which the rising of the ruler's spirit is grounded1 his yielding cannot pacify the ruler's wrath4 ,so all the subjection1 they contend1 the sufferers gave1 particularly in the beginning of the late persecution1 to the then rulers1 did not1 nor could1 pacify their wrath1 because they would not give up with their conscience and all religion1 which was the very foundation of the rising of his spirit against them2 though1 according to their explication of the text1 this was what they should have done1 and so have pacified the ruler's wrath4 ,it is but a mere shift to tell the world1 that it is only in lawful matters they are to yield2 the yielding must surely correspond to the rising of the spirit spoken of4 ,but with such deceitful shifts are they forced to cover over a doctrine1 which1 if presented in its native dress1 would not meet with such ready reception4 ,but in opposition to their strained interpretation of the text1 the ruler must be understood a lawful ruler1 who is the minister of ,god for good--one who has not only moral abilities for government1 but also a right to govern4 ,and as a subject may be keeping his place of subjection to a righteous ruler1 and yet be guilty1 in his private or public character1 of what gives just offense1 and occasions the ruler's spirit justly1 and so not sinfully1 to rise against him--thus1 one may be guilty of many criminal mismanagements in the discharge of his public trust1 guilty of profaning the name of ,god or his day1 or of riot1 excessive drinking1 c1 without having any thought of casting off the authority of his ruler--so1 when a person has hereby provoked the spirit of his ruler1 this divine precept teaches the party offending not to aggravate his offense1 by attempting 7though able7 to make good his part1 or rebel against his sovereign1 but to yield1 acknowledge his guilt and trespass1 and submit to such punishments as the lawful ruler shall justly inflict1 according to the degree and quality of the offense2 whereby only1 the ruler will be satisfied4 ,agreeable to this1 is that parallel text1 ,eccles4 viii1 #b1 #c3 ,i counsel thee to keep the king's commandment1 and that in regard of the oath of ,god3 ,be not hasty to go out of his sight2 stand not in an evil thing4 ,on the whole1 it must be a great abuse of ,scripture1 to wrest a divine precept1 which directs subjects to submit to such punishments as their lawful ruler shall justly lay them under for their offenses1 to the support of this anti-scriptural notion1 viz41 that every wicked person1 whom the majority of a nation advances to the supreme rule1 is the minister of ,god1 to whom obedience is due1 under pain of eternal damnation1 as is done with this text4 ,a third scripture1 perverted to support the above principle1 is ,luke xx1 #be3 ,render therefore to ,caesar the things which be ,caesar's1 and unto ,god the things which be ,god's4 ,from this1 ,seceders imagine strongly to fortify their cause4 ,but1 from a just view of the text1 it will appear1 that the answer given by ,christ contains no acknowledgment of ,caesar's title to tribute1 or of his authority as lawful4 ,it is beyond doubt1 that the question was captious1 and that the design of the ,scribes and ,pharisees1 in proposing it to ,christ1 was to have him ensnared in his words4 ,this they thought themselves sure of1 whether he should answer positively or negatively4 ,for if positively1 and so recognize and acknowledge ,caesar's title1 then they would have occasion to accuse him to the people1 as an enemy to the laws1 liberty and honor1 of the ,jewish nation4 ,this is evident from ver4 #bf3 ,and they could not take hold of his words before the people4 ,and then1 if he should deny that it was lawful1 they would have an opportunity or pretense of delating and delivering him to the ,roman governor1 as an enemy to ,caesar4 ,they seem1 however1 to have been confident1 that he who taught the way of ,god in truth1 without regard to any1 would never inculcate it as a duty for them to give tribute to ,caesar1 subjection to whom1 as their lawful governor1 for conscience sake1 was so contrary to the divine law given to the ,jews1 respecting their magistrates2 and if so1 they would not miss of sufficient accusation against him4 ,but here infinite wisdom shone forth1 in giving such an answer as declared their wisdom to be but folly1 and at once disappointed all their malicious hopes2 an answer which left ,caesar's claim unresolved1 as to any positive determination whether it belonged to him or not4 ,the question is in direct terms4 ,our ,lord does not directly answer to the question1 in the terms proposed by the wicked spies4 ,he neither expressly says it is lawful or unlawful to pay it1 but gave his answer in such terms as they could not from it form an accusation against him1 either to the people or to the governor4 ,he1 in general1 teaches to give ,caesar all things that1 by the law of ,god1 were due to him2 at the same time enjoining them that1 under pretense of giving to men their demands1 they rob not ,god of what was his due1 namely1 a conscientious regard to all the laws he had given them1 and universal obedience to all his commands1 without regard to persons of any station4 ,and it is certain1 that ,caesar was a proud1 aspiring1 idolatrous and bloody usurper 7like the king of ,babylon1 ,hab4 ii1 #e1 for which causes the ,lord denounces fearful wrath and judgments against him1 ,hab4 ii1 #g-ad71 having no other right to the most part of his dominions1 than the ,lord's providential disposal1 which sometimes makes the tabernacles of robbers prosper2 into whose hand ,god bringeth abundantly2 ,job xii1 #f4 ,and for their sins gives ,jacob to the spoil1 and ,israel to the robbers2 ,isa4 xiii1 #bd4 ,and giveth power to the beast1 to continue forty and two months1 and to have power over all nations2 ,rev4 xiii1 #e1 #g4 ,so that1 by looking into the divine law1 which determines every one's due1 according to their just character1 and of which they could not be ignorant1 they might see that he had a just title to all that was due to an usurper1 idolater and murderer4 ,that the ,jewish coin did bear ,caesar's image1 could be no evidence of his being their lawful sovereign1 seeing it is most common for the greatest usurpers and tyrants to stamp their image upon the coin of the nations they tyrannize over4 ,and though it be granted that the ,jews had1 by this time1 consented to ,caesar's usurpation1 yet that could not legitimate his title1 nor warrant their subjection to him for conscience sake1 seeing they could not consent to his authority1 but in express contradiction to the many plain and positive scripture precepts1 given by ,god unto them1 as has been seen above4 ,it is1 therefore1 violence done to the text 7as also opposite to the sentiments of some eminent divines on the place71 to say that it contains a command to pay tribute to ,caesar2 and it would appear from ,luke xxiii1 #b1 that the ,jews themselves did not understand it so4 ,it may be further observed1 that this is not the only instance where our ,lord1 in infinite wisdom1 declined to give direct answers to the ensnaring questions of his malicious enemies4 ,see ,john viii1 #c-ab2 ,matth4 xxi1 #bc-bh2 ,john xviii1 #ai-ba1 where are questions of a similar nature1 proposed with the same hellish intention1 and all answered by him in like manner4 ,in each of which1 ,seceders might1 on as good ground as in the answer to the question anent tribute1 say that ,christ did shift and dissemble the truth4 ,but the least insinuation of such a charge cannot be made from any of these answers1 without the greatest blasphemy4 ,a fourth text used by them for maintaining their erroneous scheme1 is ,rom4 xiii1 #a-h4 ,without animadverting upon every part of their explication of this place of holy writ1 it is sufficient to observe3 #a4 ,that the power here spoken of by the apostle1 is not a physical1 but a moral power2 a power that is lawful and warranted1 in regard of matter1 person1 title or investiture4 ,a legitimacy in each of these must go to the making of a moral power2 and an illegitimacy in any of these is an illegitimacy in the very being and constitution1 and so a nullity to the power as moral1 a making it of no authority4 ,as the text speaks only of this moral power1 so it excludes every unlawful power 7see ,mr4 ,gee on magistracy1 on this text74 #b4 ,that the being of ,god1 or the ordination ,god here spoke of1 is not a being of ,god providentially only1 but such a being of ,god as contains in it his institution and appointment1 by the warrant of his law and precept2 so that the magistrates to whom the apostle enjoins obedience1 are such as are set up according to the preceptive ordination and will of ,god1 as is evinced not only by the author referred to above1 and other divines1 but what sufficiently appears from the context1 where the subjection enjoined1 and resistance forbidden1 with their respective reasons1 are what can only be spoken with respect to powers ordained by the preceptive will of ,god4 ,again1 by considering the office and duty of the powers1 and the end of their ordination1 as described1 ver4 #c1 #d1 which by no means agree to any but those moral powers ordained by the preceptive will of ,god1 it appears a manifest abuse of this text1 to apply it to every one advanced by providence to the place of supreme rule1 not only without any regard1 but in direct opposition to the preceptive will of ,god4 ,it is most absurd and self-contradictory in professed testimony bearers for a covenanted reformation1 to apply this text in a way of pleading the lawfulness of an ,erastian1 anti-christian constitution1 that is destitute of all those qualifications already mentioned 7and always included in the scriptural definition of a lawful magistrate71 as necessary to constitute a moral power1 viz41 in regard of matter1 person1 title or investiture1 c4 ,but of the power which they so zealously plead for1 the matter is unlawful1 being ,erastian1 partly civil1 partly ecclesiastical1 by the united constitution4 ,the person invested with this supreme power1 is one who is declared incapable1 by the fundamental laws and covenanted constitution of the nations2 the manner of investiture1 and terms on which the crown is held1 sinful--the constitution being in an immediate opposition to the unalterable constitution of the kingdom of the ,messias1 and founded on the destruction of the covenanted reformation4 ,and it may be added1 that it is unlawful1 as to the exercise and application of it1 which has been all along in opposition to all true religion1 and a grievous oppression of the church1 the kingdom of ,christ1 in the liberties thereof4 ,and it must be so2 for the tree must be made good1 before the fruit can be such4 ,by all which it appears1 there is a nullity in the power as moral1 being so very opposite to the revealed will of ,god4 ,and from what is said1 it is obvious that this scripture gives no countenance to their corrupt scheme1 but furnishes with strong arguments against it4 ,a fifth scripture adduced is1 ,titus iii1 #a3 ,put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers1 c4 ,as ,seceders apply this text to the same purpose1 and explain it in the same manner1 as they have done those others above mentioned1 so what is already said is sufficient to discover the deceit of their use and explication thereof4 ,the powers and magistrates the apostle requires subjection to1 are only such as are so in a moral sense2 none but such are accounted powers and magistrates in the sense of the text4 ,the apostle must mean the same powers here he describes in ,rom4 xiii1 #a-c1 c41 otherwise he contradicts himself1 which must not be admitted2 and the powers he there speaks of1 are moral powers1 i4e41 such as have not only proper abilities for government and rule1 but also a right of constitution1 impowering them to use their abilities for that purpose4 ,how can one be expected or said to be the minister of ,god for good1 or a terror to evil doers1 and a praise to them that do well1 if he is so disposed and inclined1 as to love that which is evil1 and hate that which is good1 and so actually is a praise to evil doers1 and a terror to such as do well8 ,to suppose any such thing1 is to overthrow the universally established connection between cause and effect1 the means and the end4 ,and so much 7namely1 that the powers there spoken of are moral powers71 ,seceders are forced to grant in their explication of ,rom4 xiii4 ,say they1 ,the text speaks only of powers in a moral sense4 ,and this concession at once destroys their scheme1 and confirms what the ,presbytery plead for1 namely1 that none are lawful powers but such as are so according to the preceptive will of ,god in his word2 which certainly1 in the judgment of all who would deal reverently with the oracles of ,god1 is1 in this case1 a rule far preferable to the remainders of natural light1 in the moral dictates of right reason1 from which ,seceders fetch the institution of this divine ordinance of magistracy1 and on which they settle it1 as on 7what they call7 the natural and eternal law of ,god2 preferring that to the plain1 perfect and complete1 revelation of ,god's will in his word4 ,the last text used by them1 is1 #a ,pet4 ii1 #ac to #ag1 the import of which1 they say1 is1 that all who have a constitution by consent of the civil society1 are to be subjected to for the ,lord's sake1 as having an institution from him3 and that1 however seldom they were inclined or employed in the discharge of the duties proper to their office4 ,it may suffice to observe1 that while the apostle is here speaking1 as in the above texts1 of moral powers1 as above described1 it is evident1 that by every ordinance of man1 can only be meant the different kinds and forms of civil government1 and governors set up by men1 to each of which the apostle exhorts to a submission1 providing1 that in the setting up of these1 they acted agreeably to the general laws and rules appointed by ,god in his word1 both respecting the constitution of government1 and the qualifications of governors4 ,then1 as they bear the stamp of divine authority1 they were to be submitted to for the ,lord's sake4 ,but what manifest abuse of scripture is it1 to allege with them that the inspired apostle exhorts to submit to every monster of iniquity1 if only set up by the civil society1 though perhaps guilty of a number of crimes that by the law of ,god1 and laws of men founded thereon1 are punishable by a severe death8 ,sure1 such can never have a title to that obedience which is due to the ordinance of ,god1 who have not so much as a title to live upon the earth4 ,moreover1 let it be considered1 that in the above cited texts1 the spirit of ,god enjoins either that obedience and subjection that is due to lawful magistrates1 or that subjection only which is for a time1 by an extraordinary and special command1 such as ,jer4 xxix1 #g1 given to conquerors and usurpers1 having no right but what is providential4 ,if the first1 then they cannot intend any but those moral powers who are said to be of ,god1 in respect of his approbative and preceptive will4 ,if the last1 then these texts are not the rule of obedience to lawful rulers1 who are set up qualified1 and govern according to the law of ,god4 ,but that these texts can only be understood of the first1 is evident from this1 that in them not only is the office1 duty and end of the civil magistrate as particularly described1 as the obedience and subjection commanded2 but the one is made the foundation1 ground1 and reason of1 and inseparably connected with the other4 ,and therefore it was1 that the renowned witnesses for ,christ and his interest1 contended so much for reformation in the civil magistracy and magistrate1 in an agreeableness to the original institution of that ordinance1 and endured so great opposition on that account4 ,to conclude this3 as it is evident these texts give no countenance to the corrupt scheme of ,seceders1 but always suppose the power1 to which subjection and obedience for conscience sake is enjoined to be lawful1 in regard of matter1 person1 title1 c4 ,so the ,presbytery cannot but testify against them for perverting and wresting the scriptures of truth1 to a favoring of their anarchical and anti-scriptural tenet1 and for their so stiffly and tenaciously pleading for avowed apostasy and defection 7which is the whole scope and amount of their declared scheme of politics71 viz41 that it is lawful for posterity to turn back to where their forefathers were1 giving up with many precious truths1 and further attainments in reformation1 valuable and necessary1 acquired at the expense of much zeal1 faithfulness and treasure1 and handed down to us1 sealed by the spirit of ,god upon the souls of his people1 as his work and cause2 and on public scaffolds and high places of the field1 with the dearest blood of multitudes of ,christ's faithful witnesses1 who loved not their lives unto the death4 ,and this1 in express contradiction to the land's solemn covenant engagements to the ,lord1 for maintaining and holding fast that whereunto we had attained4 ,for notwithstanding all the regard and deference ,seceders profess to the covenants and reformation principles1 they are1 all the while1 directly pleading in defense of the same cause1 advancing the same arguments to support it1 and likewise giving the same corrupt and perverted explication of the above texts of scripture1 that the merciless and bloody murderers and persecuters did1 in the late tyrannous times1 in their stated opposition to the cause and interest of glorious ,christ1 together with the indulged who took part with them1 in opposing the kingdom and subjects of ,zions exalted ,king4 ,and as pity it is ,seceders have pleaded the cause of malignants1 and1 rubbing the rust from their antiquated arguments1 have presented them with a new lustre2 so the ,presbytery1 in opposition thereto1 are satisfied to plead the same cause1 with the same arguments and to understand these scriptures in the same sense as was done by the witnesses for reformation1 whom the ,lord honored to seal his truths with their blood1 as is sufficiently confirmed from the ,cloud of ,witnesses2 where their concurring testimonies are harmoniously stated1 upon their disowning the authority of the then anti-christian and ,erastian government1 even when acknowledged by the bulk and body of the nation1 both civil and ecclesiastical4 ,whence also it is evident1 that the persecution was not the cause of their casting off that authority2 but that authority's assuming and usurping the royal prerogatives of ,christ1 the church's ,head1 was the cause of their disowning it2 and then their refusing to acknowledge foresaid authority1 was the cause of all their persecution4 #c4 ,the ,presbytery testify against foresaid ,associates1 on account of their corruption in worship2 particularly1 in the duty of prayer1 both as practiced by their ministers1 and by them enjoined upon their people4 ,wherein1 in an inconsistency with a faithful testimony against the declared enemies of the church's head and king1 they affect to express a superlative loyalty unto the prelatic possessors of power1 not much differing from the forms imposed upon1 and observed by the ,erastian church4 ,the ,presbytery acknowledge it duty to pray for all men1 in the various stations of life1 as sinners lost1 of the ruined family of ,adam1 standing absolutely in need of a ,savior1 that they may be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth2 as is enjoined1 ,tim4 ii1 #a1 #b4 ,which yet must not be understood in an unlimited sense1 but with submission to the will of ,god1 if they belong to the election of grace4 ,nay1 they acknowledge it indispensable duty1 as to pray1 that the church may obtain such kings and queens1 as shall he nursing fathers and mothers1 according to the ,lord's gracious promise2 so1 when such are granted to them1 it is their duty to make prayers and supplications1 in a particular manner1 for them4 ,but it is no less than an abuse of scripture1 and flat contradiction to many promises and threatenings1 to extend foresaid command to every person without distinction whom providence advances to the supreme rule over the people of ,god1 in a way of acknowledging their authority as lawful1 and of praying for success and prosperity to them 7as ,seceders do71 to pray for success unto1 and the continuance of wicked rulers1 that are enemies to the ,lord1 and usurpers of his crown1 and such whom the ,lord in anger against a people for their sins1 may send as a special punishment upon them1 and from whom he has promised deliverance unto his people1 as a peculiar blessing1 is no less than the slighting of the promises1 and deriding of threatenings1 and in reality1 is a taking part with ,god's enemies1 against him and his cause4 ,as it is impossible1 sincerely to pray for the coming of ,christ's kingdom1 and advancement thereof1 without also1 as a necessary mean conducive thereto1 to pray for the downfall and destruction of all his enemies1 as such1 whatever be their place and station 7which is not at all inconsistent with praying for their salvation1 as lost sinners72 seeing ,jesus ,christ no less effectually destroys his enemies1 when he makes them to bow in a way of willing subjection to the scepter of his law and grace1 than when he breaks them in pieces with his iron rod of wrath2 so1 how self-contradictory is it in ,seceders1 to pray for the coming of ,christ's mediatory kingdom2 and1 at the same time to pray for the success and preservation of one1 in his kingly character1 who themselves acknowledge1 has1 in that character1 made grievous encroachments upon the royal prerogatives of the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 is an usurper of his crown1 and therefore1 in that view1 must be considered as an enemy to his kingdom8 ,that the above is no false charge against ,seceders1 is witnessed by a variety of their causes of fasting1 concluding with such prayers1 which they have emitted1 as well as by their daily practice3 and particularly1 ,antiburgher ,seceders1 have given a late recent proof of this2 in what they call1 ,a solemn warning by the ,associate ,synod1 c4 ,which unfaithful warning concludes with a self-contradictory form of prayer1 enjoined upon all under the inspection of said ,synod4 ,among other things1 they exhort all--the people under their inspection1 to pour out earnest and incessant supplications before the ,lord1 in a dependence upon the merit and intercession of our great ,high-priest1 that he may--bring about a revival of our covenanted reformation1--removing all the mountains which stand in the way2 that he may abundantly bless our sovereign king ,george1 and the apparent heir of the crown1--blasting all the plots or efforts of whatever enemies1 open or secret1--against the ,protestant succession to the throne of these kingdoms in the family of ,hanover2 that he may be gracious to the high courts of parliament1 in this and the neighboring island1--leading them to proper measures for the honor of ,christ2 that he may hasten the enlargement of the ,mediator's kingdom1 c4 ,on all which1 let it suffice to observe1 #a4 ,that as in no part of this prayer they make any exceptions against1 so they must be understood therein1 approving of the constitution of the king1 the establishment1 and limitation of the throne of these kingdoms in the ,hanoverian family1 as presently by law established3 and also1 approving of the ,british and ,irish1 parliaments1 in their constitution as by law established1 though both of them grossly ,erastian1 and necessarily connected with maintaining ,english popish ceremonies1 the whole ,english hierarchy1 and civil places and power of churchmen2 in opposition to the word of ,god1 reforming laws1 and covenanted constitutions of the nations4 ,hence1 #b4 ,this pattern of prayer must be understood as containing earnest supplications to the ,lord1 that he may continue and preserve an ,erastian constitution1 that he may perpetuate the limited succession to the throne in the family of ,hanover2 and that1 in opposition to all attempts whatever1 toward any change1 however much it might contribute to the glory of ,god1 good of the church1 and revival of a covenanted reformation2 and also1 seems to include a desire that1 ,god may preserve and maintain a parliament in the nations1 one of the houses whereof1 viz41 the ,house of ,peers1 is composed partly of spiritual lords1 as essential members thereof1--an anti-christian designation1 a title and office1 not to be found in the book of divine revelation4 ,so1 #c4 ,this prayer seems to suppose a consistency between the preservation of all these1 and the revival of a covenanted reformation in these lands2 and also that they1 particularly a parliament1 thus anti-christian in its constitution1 are proper instruments for promoting the honor and declarative glory of ,christ2 although the prelates1 constituent members therein1 are a generation of men that were never yet known to have a vote for ,christ's kingdom and interest4 ,and therefore1 #d4 ,this prayer consists of flat contradiction4 7#a47 ,in regard the revival of a covenanted reformation1 and the flourishing of ,christ's mediatory kingdom1 nationally1 must be attended with the overthrow of all constitutions1 civil and ecclesiastical1 that hinder and oppose the same2 ,hag4 ii1 #f1 #g1 and with the down bringing of all the enemies thereof1 from the height of their excellency4 7#b47 ,it is a contradiction for them to pray1 that the ,lord would remove all the mountains that stand in the way of the revival of our reformation2 and yet1 at the same time1 pray for the preservation and continuance of the constitution1 under which 7as they themselves acknowledge1 ,defense of their ,princ41 page #ea73 ,there is a mighty bar thrust into the way of our covenanted reformation1 both in church and state2 yea1 a gravestone is laid1 and established upon the same4 7#c47 ,it is a sinful and glaring contradiction for ,seceders to rank an approbation of the ,english hierarchy among our public national sins and steps of defection 7as they do1 page #ec of their pamphlet72 and yet themselves persist and continue in the same sin and guilt1 homologating and approving the anti-christian constitution of the ,british and ,irish parliaments1 by praying 7like their forefathers1 in their fulsome address to ,james the ,papist7 for divine illumination and conduct to the ,prelates in their civil places and power1 as necessary members there1 as they do in this prayer of theirs4 ,can such be supposed to be either truly sensible of sin1 or humbled for it1 who1 notwithstanding all their confessions1 still continue in the love and practice of it8 ,but with such mock acknowledgements 7of which a variety of other instances might be given7 have they hitherto imposed on the generation4 ,and so1 #e4 ,it is a prayer1 that in several parts thereof1 has no scripture warrant1 no foundation in the promises of ,god4 ,particularly1 on what scriptural warrant1 what promise1 can ,seceders build their prayers for1 or expectation of the ,lord's answering them1 by blessing an ,erastian government to themselves or others1 which being1 in its constitution1 contrary to the word of ,god1--is such1 that under it 7as they grant1 ibid1 page #df71 a people cannot truly prosper in their civil concerns1 nor be enriched with the blessings of the gospel8 ,from what scriptural promise are they warranted to pray1 that ,god may perpetuate the succession to the throne in any one family1 and especially1 when that succession is circumscribed and limited1 in a way opposite to the laws of ,god1 and mediatory kingdom of ,christ8 and therefore1 a prayer that cannot be made in faith1 and so cannot be acceptable to ,god in its complex form4 ,no person can have faith in the merit and intercession of ,christ1 for obtaining anything in prayer1 but what ,christ has priorly merited1 and does actually intercede for4 ,but it would savor too much of blasphemy1 to apply some of the particulars already noticed in this form of prayer1 to the merit and intercession of our great ,high-priest4 ,sure it cannot be thought1 that he makes intercession for the prosperity and success of his enemies1 in their stated opposition to his kingdom and interest in this world2 neither can it be consistent with fidelity to ,christ1 as a ,king1 for his professed subjects to pray for it4 ,what a fearful trifling with ,god in the duty of prayer1 is it to pray that the ,lord may bring down ,popery and ,prelacy2 and next breath to pray that the ,lord may continue1 prosper1 and preserve the ,erastian head1 and great bulwark of ,prelacy8 #d4 ,again1 the ,presbytery testify against the ,associate party for their treachery in covenant4 ,this is a sin that is in scripture1 and even by the common voice of mankind1 declared very heinous2 but which1 by what is already discovered anent said party1 appears too1 too justly chargeable upon them4 ,it is notorious1 and what themselves boast much of1 that they professedly maintain the moral and perpetual obligation of the covenants1 both the ,national ,covenant of ,scotland1 and the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant of ,scotland1 ,england1 and ,ireland1 entered into for reformation and defense of religion1 and bringing the churches of ,god in the three kingdoms to the nearest conjunction and uniformity in religion1 according to the word of ,god4 ,they also do in the most public manner profess1 that they are the only true faithful witnesses for a covenanted reformation4 ,but the consistency of such a profession with maintaining principles that are diametrically opposite to these covenants1 and the cause of truth1 sworn to in them 7as has been made evident they do7 is altogether unintelligible4 ,is it possible strenuously to maintain the lawfulness of a prelatical government abjured in the covenants1 and yet at the same time sincerely and honestly1 according to the profession made by the church1 ,psal4 xliv1 #ag1 #ah1 to contend for the moral obligation of the covenants1 and the work of reformation sworn to in them8 ,but further1 the necessity of lifting up a testimony against ,seceders for their treachery and unfaithfulness in the matter of the covenants1 will appear by considering that they1 after making a very solemn profession of renewing the ,national ,covenant of ,scotland1 and the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant of the three lands1 in place of practicing accordingly1 have1 in reality1 made a new and very different bond or covenant1 both in form and substance1 which they have not only sworn themselves1 but also imposed upon many honest people3 and this as a renewing1 nay1 as the only right way of renewing said covenants according to the circumstances1 of the times4 ,that this bond entered into by ,seceders 7however good it may be1 considered in an abstract sense7 is not a renovation of the national covenants1 as they assert it to be1 but a treacherous and deceitful burying of these covenants1 as to their sum and substance1 is abundantly evident from their industrious keeping out1 and omitting the most part of them out of their new and artificial bond4 ,particularly1 although they pretend to a renovation both of the ,national and ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 yet they have almost entirely left out1 and passed over the ,national ,covenant of ,scotland2 and satisfying themselves with simply testifying against ,popery1 have omitted all the particular errors1 and branches thereof expressly contained in the ,national ,covenant4 ,as to the ,solemn ,league1 of which they pretend their bond is also a renovation1 there is very little of it to be found therein1 as appears from a comparison of the one with the other4 ,thus they have left out that remarkable and necessary clause in the first ,article1 viz41 ,against our common enemies3 and in place of endeavoring to bring the churches of ,god in the three kingdoms to the nearest conjunction and uniformity in religion1 ,confession of ,faith1 ,form of ,church ,government1 ,directory for ,worship and ,catechizing1 as in said article1 there is an unintelligible clause or jumble of words brought in1 viz41 to promote and advance our covenanted conjunction and uniformity in religion1 just as if that conjunction and uniformity had a present existence 7in its native and original state and form7 in the three lands2 when1 on the contrary1 ,presbytery is established in ,scotland1 yet not on the footing of the word of ,god and the covenants1 and ,episcopacy is established in ,england and ,ireland1 in contradiction to the word of ,god and the covenants4 #b4 ,they have kept out that necessary clause in the #b;d article1 viz41 ,without respect of persons1 endeavor the extirpation1 c1 and instead thereof say1 ,testify against ,popery and ,prelacy2 where appears not only a difference in expression1 but a substantial difference4 #c4 ,they have altogether omitted and kept out the #c;d and #dth articles4 #d4 ,they have kept out that material and necessary clause in the #eth article1 viz41 ,that justice may be done on the willful opposers thereof1 in manner expressed in the preceding article4 #e4 ,they have left out all the #fth article1 excepting these words3 ,we shall not give ourselves up to a detestable neutrality and indifference in the cause of ,god4 ,and #f4 ,they have wholly omitted that material paragraph of the conclusion of the ,solemn ,league4 ,it is therefore evident1 that the model of the covenants agreed to by ,seceders1 is different in substance1 as well as form1 from our ancient covenants2 so that1 under pretense of renovation1 they have made a new bond4 ,but1 again1 that their pretended renovation is a real burying of the covenanted reformation1 appears from their overlooking1 casting by1 and keeping out the ,national ,covenant1 as it was renewed in the year #afch1 and the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant1 as renewed in the year #afdh1 and going back to the years #aehj and #aeha1 as the pattern they propose to follow in carrying on of their covenanted testimony4 ,and what can be the reason of this8 ,can it be1 because ,prelacy1 and the civil places and power of churchmen1 were1 by the explication and application of the covenant1 anno #afch1 expressly and explicitly condemned1 while they were formerly only implicitly1 and by way of consequence8 ,so they have at least1 by this step back1 both tacitly condemned our reformers1 of giving themselves needless trouble in their explanation of the covenant1 as condemning and abjuring ,episcopacy2 and also1 do overlook1 despise1 and disgracefully bury the many advanced steps of reformation attained to in these covenanted lands between #afch and #afdi 7particularly the church of ,scotland's testimony against ,prelacy7 in which time reformation arrived to a greater height of purity than ever was attained in any foregoing period of this church and nation4 ,however1 whatever their reasons were for so doing1 that they have so done is clear1 from their act ,edinburgh1 ,february #c;d1 #agdc1 where they conclude with a nota bene1 lest it should not otherwise have been observed that they do so1 and thereby declare their sin as ,sodom1 as if the publishing of it would make an atonement for it4 ,n4,b4 ,only the ,national ,covenant1 as it was entered into1 annis #aehj1 #aeha 7without the bond wherein it was renewed anno #afch7 and the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant 7without the solemn acknowledgment of sins1 and engagement to duties1 anno #afdh71 are hereby prefixed unto the following act1 agreeably unto the design of said act3 and for this they pretend the example of our reformers1 anno #afch1 who renewed the ,national ,covenant by a new bond1 in place of that new bond wherewith it was renewed and sworn1 #aeij1 which they omitted--wherein their deceit and unfaithfulness is very obvious from the following observations3 #a4 ,hereby they have cast a most injurious calumny and reproach upon our honored reformers1 and in their pretending to imitate their practice1 in renovation of the covenants1 are guilty of a most dreadful and deceitful imposition on the generation2 for though our reformers did renew the covenants with a new bond1 and perhaps very seldom swear them without some additions1 yet they never went back from any part of reformation1 espoused1 and sworn to in the renovations that were before them1 under a pretense1 that such points of reformation formerly attained1 were unsuitable1 or not adapted to their circumstances1 as ,seceders have done4 ,on the contrary1 our reformers1 in all the different renovations of the covenants1 not only included all that was formerly attained to1 binding themselves in strict adherence to all the articles priorly in the oath and covenant of ,god 7at the same time solemnly acknowledging all former breaches thereof2 and obliging themselves1 in the strength of grace to the performance of the contrary1 and consequential duties71 but also1 still went forward in explaining and more explicitly applying the covenants against the sins of the day1 and more expressly binding themselves to the opposite duties1 as is clear from the bond wherewith our reformers renewed the covenants #afch1 and the solemn acknowledgment of sins1 and engagement to duties1 #afdh2 both which the ,seceders have barefacedly cast by and exploded in their alleged renovation of the covenants2 whereby1 as it is manifest that our reformers always went forward to further degrees of reformation1 so it is no less manifest1 that foresaid party acting contrary to them1 have gone backward4 ,but #b;d4 ,they have not only rejected the renovations of the covenants by our ancestors #afch and #afdj2 but even when they pretended to follow the renovation of the covenant1 #aehj and #aeha1 they have kept out and perverted almost the whole of the national covenants1 as was already observed2 particularly in their new bond1 they have cast away the civil part of the covenants altogether4 ,for what reason they do so1 is indeed hard to say4 ,true1 they allege it would be a blending of civil and religious matters together2 and that it is not proper 7or competent for them1 as a church judicatory7 to meddle in these matters that are of a civil nature4 ,but seeing infinite wisdom has not judged it a 7sinful7 blending of civil and religious concerns together1 to deliver the duties both civil and religious in one and the same moral law unto mankind2 it is difficult to conceive1 how the people of ,god their binding themselves in a covenant of duties to the conscientious performance of all the duties ,god required of them in his word1 whether civil or religious1 according to their respective or immediate objects1 can be reputed a blending of them together2 or that this has the remotest tendency to destroy that distinction which ,god in his revealed will has stated between what is immediately civil in its nature1 and what is properly religious4 ,this1 therefore1 is a mere groundless pretense and evasion2 and if it has any force at all1 as a reason1 it strikes against the reformers who compiled these covenants4 ,they are the proper objects at whom through the sides of others it thrusts2 for they1 at the framing of sundry of their covenants1 and afterward at the renovation of their covenant1 did it both without the ecclesiastical authority1 and also without1 and contrary unto1 yea1 at the hazard of suffering the greatest severities from the civil authority on that account4 ,and yet the ecclesiastical judicatories of the church of ,scotland afterward found it competent for them1 as such1 to approve of these covenants1 both as to the matter and form of them1 without branding and exploding them as a blending of matters civil and religious together1 as ,seceders have done4 ,again1 as the covenants require no other than a lawful magistrate2 and seeing ,seceders acknowledge the present as lawful1 and that it is their duty to be subject to1 and support them as such1 it is impossible to conceive any reason1 why they have not honored the present rulers with a place in their new and artificial bond3 unless perhaps this1 that they were aware that would have been so glaring a contradiction to these covenants they were pretending to renew1 as would doubtless have startled and driven away from them a good many honest people1 whom they have allured and led aside by their good words and fair-set speeches2 and yet it is pretty obvious they have included the present rulers in their bond1 and taken them in an oblique and clandestine way1 by swearing to the relative duties contained in the fifth commandment1 seeing they acknowledge them as their civil parents4 ,again1 as their bond is supposed to reduplicate upon the national covenants1 and so to bind to every article in them1 by native consequence1 they swear to a prelatical government3 for seeing they have made no exception in their bond1 it must be applied to no other1 but the government1 which presently exists2 and this1 in flat contradiction to the covenants1 by which such a government is abjured4 ,so that their new bond is no less opposite to the national covenants1 and is much mere deceitful1 than if they had plainly and explicitly sworn allegiance to the present government therein2 only the generality of their implicit followers do not so readily observe it4 ,upon the whole1 how strange is it1 that they should have the assurance to father their deceitful apostasy1 and wretched burying of the covenants upon our reformers1 so injuriously to their character1 and at the hazard of imposing a heinous and base cheat upon the world1 while1 notwithstanding all their vain pretensions1 it is undeniably evident to those who will impartially1 and without prejudice1 examine the method and order whereby our ancestors renewed our covenants1 that in this they have been so far from following their example1 that they have directly contradicted the same1 and1 in reality1 buried much of the covenants and work of reformation sworn to in them4 ,for though a people may very lawfully1 by a new bond1 enlarge and add to their former obligations that they brought themselves under2 yet they can never1 without involving themselves in the guilt of perjury1 relax or cancel former obligations by any future bond4 ,accordingly1 our worthy ancestors1 by all the new bonds they annexed to former obligations1 were so far from attempting to loose themselves from any covenanted duty that either they or their fathers were priorly bound unto1 that they thereby still brought themselves under straighter bonds to perform all their former and new obligations of duty to ,god4 ,but1 as has been discovered1 ,seceders1 by their artificial bond1 have cast out the very substance and spirit of the covenants1 by their rumping and hewing them at pleasure1 to reduce them to the sinful circumstances of the time3 and this1 in opposition to their own public profession1 that these covenants are moral in their nature and obligation upon these nations to the latest posterity4 ,how surprising it is then1 that after such a profession1 they dare cast out of their bond the greatest parts of the covenants6 ,this is not only to break these obligations1 but it is to make a public declaration1 that different times and circumstances do free men from their obligation to keep their most solemn vows to the ,most ,high4 ,to this1 as very applicable1 may be subjoined the words of ,mr4 ,case1 in a sermon relative to the covenants3 ,others have taken it 7viz41 the covenant7 with their own evasions1 limitations and reservations3 such a ,jesuitical spirit has got in among us1 by which means it comes to pass1 that by that time that men have pared off and left out1 and put what interpretation they frame to themselves1 there is little left worth the name of a covenant4 ,and1 indeed1 so many are the self-inconsistencies and gross contradictions attending this new bond1 that it would have been much more for the honor both of the covenants1 and of ,seceders themselves1 rather never to have attempted such a work1 than to have done it in a way of tearing to pieces our solemn national vows4 ,wherefore the ,presbytery cannot but1 in testifying against them for their unfaithfulness1 obtest all the lovers of truth1 to beware of joining in this course of treachery1 and apostasy from ,god and his covenanted cause4 #e4 ,the presbytery testify against foresaid party1 for their unfaithfulness and partiality in point of testimony-bearing to a covenanted1 work of reformation2 while yet they not only profess to be witnesses1 but the only true and faithful contenders for the said work and cause4 ,the justness of this charge manifestly appears from the scope of their ,act and ,testimony1 which seems to be principally leveled against the corruptions of the present church judicatories1 and not equally against the corruptions of both church and state1 in agreeableness to the faithful testimonies of the ,lord's people in former times1 and in a consistency with the reformation that was jointly carried on in both church and state1 and solemnly sworn and engaged to in the covenants4 ,they appear never to have fully adopted the testimony of the ,church of ,scotland in her purest times1 when the profession of the true religion was by law made a necessary qualification of every one that should be admitted to places of civil trust and power in the nation4 ,nor are the faithful testimonies of the valiant sufferers and contenders1 even unto death1 for the precious truths of ,god in the late persecuting period1 as stated against both church and state1 fully stated1 and judicially approven by them2 much less have they fully adopted the testimony1 as stated against the revolution constitution1 both civil and ecclesiastical1 which they did not in their testimony condemn as sinful2 but1 on the contrary1 acknowledged the civil constitution lawful1 notwithstanding of their complaining of some defects and omissions therein4 ,of which error in the foundation1 it may be said1 in respect of all the mal-administrations since1 it was fons et origo mali4 ,and seeing1 in and by the revolution constitution1 the nation was involved in the guilt of apostasy and treachery1 in subverting and overturning the good and laudable laws for true religion and right liberty1 a faint declaring against some omissions cannot be accounted sufficient2 especially when what is thus partly complained of1 is at the same time complexly extolled1 as a great and glorious deliverance to the church and nation4 ,their testimony further appears to be partial and unfaithful1 considering that their secession was not from the constitution of the ,revolution ,church1 but in a partial and limited way1 from a prevailing corrupt party in the judicatories of the church3 upon which footing it was1 that some of greatest note among them made their accession after their first secession1 expressly declaring so much2 whereby they have injured the true state of the testimony which the ,lord honored his covenanted ,church of ,scotland to bear2 which is stated against all lukewarm and ,laodicean professors1 as well as open enemies1 and against all ,erastian usurpation1 and sectarian invasion on the cause of ,christ4 ,moreover1 their unfaithfulness in point of testimony1 convincingly appears from their bitter contentions1 and almost endless disputes among themselves1 after their breach1 upon the religious clause of some burgess oaths1 anent the true state of their own testimony1 whether lifted up against the revolution constitution of the church1 and settlement of religion1 or not4 ,had necessary and real faithfulness been studied1 in stating their testimony clearly and plainly1 against all the defection1 and apostasy of the day from a covenanted reformation1 there had been no occasion for such a dispute among them4 ,and now1 when the one party have more openly avowed their unfaithfulness1 in receding from almost everything that had the least appearance of faithfulness to the cause and covenant of ,god1 in their former testimony1 and professedly adopted the revolution settlement1 as theirs1 acknowledging the constitutions1 both civil and ecclesiastical1 as lawful1 in an open contradiction to any testimony for reformation work3 the other party1 to wit1 ,antiburghers1 have now indeed professedly cast off the revolution constitution of the church 7at the same time continuing to make their partial ,act and ,testimony the basis of their distinguished profession72 but yet1 in an inconsistency therewith1 and in contradiction to the covenanted testimony of the church of ,scotland1 continue to adopt the constitution of the ,state1 as being1 however defective1 yet agreeable to the precept and so lawful4 ,hence1 they are still most partial in their testimony1 of which they have given a fresh and notable proof1 in forementioned warning published by them3 wherein though there are a variety of evils condescended upon1 as just grounds of the ,lord's controversy with the nations1 yet there is not that faithfulness used therein1 in a particular charging home of the several sins mentioned1 upon every one in their different ranks1 as1 in agreeableness to the word of ,god1 is requisite to work a conviction in every one1 that they may turn from their sins1 and as might correspond to the title given that performance4 ,thus1 passing other instances that might also have been observed1 they justly remark1 page #cast1 ,the glorious sovereignty of our ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 as the alone ,king and ,head of his church1 is sadly encroached upon and opposed by the royal supremacy1 in causes ecclesiastical4 ,the king is acknowledged as supreme head1 or governor on earth1 of the churches of ,england and ,ireland4 ,the civil sovereign is thus declared to be the head or fountain of church power1 from whence all authority and ministrations in these churches do spring1 is vested with all powers of government and discipline1 and constituted the sole judge of controversies within the same4 ,the established ,church of ,scotland have also1 by some particular managements1 subjected and subordinated their ecclesiastical meetings to the civil power4 ,but while they acknowledge this to be the sin of the church1 and an high provocation against the ,lord2 yet1 as to the particular sin of the civil power1 in assuming and usurping this ,erastian supremacy unto itself1 they are quite silent4 ,they have not the faithfulness to say1 in their warning1 to the robber of ,christ1 in this matter1 as once the prophet of the ,lord said to the king of ,israel1 in another case1 ,thou art the man4 ,on the contrary 7which cannot but have a tendency to ward off any conviction of his sin that this warning1 should it come into his hands1 might be expected to work71 they are guilty of the basest flattery1 used by court parasites1 stiling him1 the best of kings1 of the mildest administration1 as in page #acth2 and acknowledge it1 as a particular effect of the ,lord's goodness1 that we are privileged with such an one4 ,but is he indeed deserving of such a character8 better than which could not be given to the most faithful ruler1 devoting all his power1 as in duty bound1 to the support and advancement of the kingdom and interest of ,jesus ,christ1 that over reigned4 ,does he really merit such an encomium1 who sacrilegiously usurps and wears the crown1 that alone can flourish on the head of ,zion's king8 ,and is this such a blessing to the church1 that an enemy to her ,lord and ,head rules over her8 ,oh6 may not the ,lord say8 ,i hearkened and heard1 but they spake not aright4 #f4 ,the ,presbytery testify against said ,seceding party1 because of the sinfulness of their terms of ministerial and ,christian communion1 as being partly destructive of that liberty wherewith ,christ has made his people free4 ,by which they have both imposed upon themselves1 and shut the door of access unto the privileges of the church1 upon all such1 as1 in a consistency with their adherence to truth and duty1 cannot accept of their unwarrantable restrictions4 ,of this1 they gave early discoveries1 as appears from the known instance of that notable1 backslider1 ,mr4 ,andrew ,clarkson1 whom they obliged1 before license1 to make a public and solemn renunciation of his former principles and profession1 respecting the covenanted reformation4#d ,as also1 their rejecting all accessions from his ,laodicean brethren1 wherein was contained an explicit adherence to the same1 until they did drop their former testimony4 ,this blind zeal in ,seceders1 against a testimony for truth in its purity1 did gradually increase1 until it hurried them on to a more particular and formal stating of their terms of communion1 whereby were totally excluded all the free and faithful of the land from their communion1 who could not approve of1 nor swear the bond1 whereby they pretended to renew the covenants3 as in their act at ,edinburgh1 #agdd2 wherein they did resolve and determine1 ,that the renovation of the ,national ,covenant of ,scotland1 and the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant of the three nations1 in the manner now agreed upon1 and proposed by the ,presbytery1 shall be the terms of ministerial communion with this ,presbytery1 and likewise of ,christian communion1 in admission of people to sealing ordinances2 secluding therefrom all opposers1 contemners1 and slighters of the said renovation of our solemn covenants4 ,by this act1 ,seceders have obliged their adherents to consent to their infamous burial of our national covenants with the ,lord1 and reformation therein sworn to1 particularly as they were renewed1 both #afch and #afdh4 ,and that they might further evince their resolution to bear down the foresaid work1 they afterward proceeded to subjoin unto their formula of questions to be put to candidates before license1 and to probationers before ordination1 the following questions1 viz41 ,are you satisfied with1 and do you propose to adhere unto1 and maintain the principles about the present civil government1 which are declared and maintained in the ,associate ,presbytery's answers to ,mr4 ,nairn1 with their defense thereunto subjoined8 ,whereby1 in opposition to the professed endeavors for the revival of a covenanted reformation in the lands1 they expressly bind down all their intrants into the office of the ministry1 to an explicit acknowledgement of their anti-government scheme of principles anent the ordinance of magistracy2 and thereby to an acknowledging of the lawfulness of a government1 which themselves confess has not only departed from1 and neglected their duty of espousing and supporting the covenanted principles of this church1 but also opposed1 contradicted and overthrown the glorious reformation once established in these nations4 ,a government1 under which1 as they profess1 the nations cannot be enriched by the blessings of the gospel2 and that1 because it does not1 in all the appurtenances of its constitution and administration1 run in agreeableness to the word of ,god4 ,by all which it appears that although they refuse formally to swear any oaths of allegiance to the powers in being2 yet they do materially1 and with great solemnity1 engage themselves to be true and faithful to a government1 under which1 and while it stands1 they are certain1 if their concessions hold true1 that they shall never see the nations flourish1 either in their temporal or spiritual interests4 ,it is only needful further to observe1 that ,seceders in the terms of their communion1 by debarring from the table of the ,lord1 all who impugn the lawfulness of a prelatic1 ,erastian government 7as is notourly known they do71 make subjection and loyalty to such an authority1 a necessary1 and1 to them1 commendatory qualification of worthy receivers of the ,lord's supper1 although none of those qualifications--required by ,god in his word4 ,while 7as has been already observed7 they1 with the most violent passion1 refuse to admit the professing and practicing the true religion1 a necessary qualification of lawful civil rulers over a people possessed of and professing the true religion1 which is in effect to deny the necessity of religion altogether as to civil rulers1 than which nothing can be more absurd4 ,lastly1 not to multiply more particulars1 the ,presbytery testify against the scandalous abuse1 and sinful prostitution of church discipline1 and tyranny in government1 whereby the forementioned party have remarkably signalized themselves2 and which1 in a most precipitant and arbitrary manner1 they have pretended to execute against such as have discovered the smallest degree of faithfulness1 in endeavoring to maintain the principles of our reformation1 in agreeableness to the true state of the covenanted testimony of the ,church of ,scotland2 which has not only appeared in the case of ,david ,leslie1 and some others1 on account of a paper of grievances given in to said ,associates2 against whom they proceeded to the sentence of excommunication1 without using those formalities and means of conviction required and warranted by the church's ,head1 even in the case of just offenses done by any of the professed members of his mystical body2 or so much as allowing that common justice to the sentenced party1 that might be expected from any judicatory1 bearing the name of ,presbyterian4 7,though the ,presbytery are not hereby to be understood as approving every expression contained in foresaid paper47 ,but particularly1 they have given notable proof of their fixed resolution1 to bear down all just appearances in favor of ,zion's ,king and cause1 in the case of ,mr4 ,nairn1 once of their number1 because of his espousing the principles of this ,presbytery1 especially1 respecting ,god's ordinance of magistracy1 against whom they proceeded to the highest censures of the church1 upon the footing of a pretended libel2 in which libel1 they did not so much as pretend any immorality in practice1 or yet error in principle1 as the ground of their arbitrary procedure1 further than his espousing the received principles of this church in her best times1 and what stood in necessary connection with such a profession3 although1 in adorable providence1 he has since been left to fall into the practice of such immorality1 as has justly rendered him the object of church censure by this ,presbytery4 ,as also in the case of ,messrs4 ,alexander ,marshall1 and ,john ,cuthbertson1 with some others1 elders and private ,christians1 against whom they proceeded in a most unaccountable1 anti-scriptural1 and unprecedented manner1 and upon no better foundation1 than that noticed in the case above1 pretended to depose and cast such out of the communion of their church1 as never had subjected to their authority1 nor formerly stood in any established connection with them4 ,and further1 besides these instances condescended upon1 they habitually aggravate their abuse of the ordinances of ,christ's house1 in pretending to debar and excommunicate from the holy sacrament of the supper1 many of the friends and followers of the ,lamb1 only because they cannot conscientiously1 and in a consistency with their fidelity to their ,head and ,savior1 acknowledge the authority of the usurpers of his crown as lawful4 ,from all which1 and every other instance of their continued prostitution of the discipline instituted by ,christ in his church1 and of that authority1 which he1 as a ,son over his own house1 has given unto faithful gospel ministers1 to the contempt and scorn of an ungodly generation2 the ,presbytery cannot but testify against them1 as guilty of exercising a tyrannical power over the heritage of the ,lord2 and to whom may too justly be applied1 the word of the ,lord1 spoken by his prophet1 ,isa4 lxvi1 #e3 ,your brethren that bated you1 that cast you out for my name's sake1 said1 ,let the ,lord be glorified3 but he shall appear to your joy1 and they shall be ashamed4 ,wherefore1 and for all the foresaid grounds1 the ,presbytery find and declare1 that the pretended ,associate ,presbytery1 now called ,synod1 whether before or since1 in their separate capacity1 claiming a parity of power1 neither were1 nor are lawful and rightly constituted courts of the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 according to his word1 and to the testimony of the true ,presbyterian ,covenanted ,church of ,christ in ,scotland3 and therefore ought not1 nay cannot1 in a consistency with bearing a faithful testimony for the covenanted truths1 and cause of our glorious ,redeemer1 be countenanced or submitted to in their authority by his people4 ,again1 the ,presbytery find themselves in duty obliged to testify against these brethren who some time ago have broken off from their communion1 for their unwarrantable separation1 and continued opposition to the truth and testimony1 in the hands of this ,presbytery1 even to the extent of presuming1 in a judicial capacity1 to threaten church censure against the ,presbytery1 without alleging so much as any other reason for this strange procedure1 than their refusing to approve as truth1 a point of doctrine1 that stands condemned by the standards of the ,reformed ,church of ,scotland1 founded on the authority of divine revelation4 ,but1 as the ,presbytery have formerly published a vindication of the truth maintained by them1 and of their conduct1 respecting the subject matter of difference with their quondam brethren1 they refer to said vindication1 for a more particular discovery of the error of their principle1 and extravagance of their conduct in this matter4 ,and particularly1 they testify against the more avowed apostasy of some of these brethren1 who are not ashamed to declare their backslidings in the streets1 and publish them upon the house tops2 as especially appears from a sermon entitled1 ,bigotry ,disclaimed--together with the vindication of said sermon2 wherein is vented such a loose and latitudinarian scheme of principles1 on the point of church communion1 as had a native tendency to destroy the scriptural boundaries thereof1 adopted by this church in her most advanced purity2 and which is also inconsistent with the ordination vows1 whereby the author was solemnly engaged4 ,this1 with other differences1 best known to themselves1 occasioned a rupture in that pretended ,presbytery1 which for some years subsisted3 but this breach being some considerable time ago again cemented1 they constituted themselves in their former capacity1 upon terms 7as appears from a printed account of their agreement and constitution1 which they have never yet disclaimed as unjust7 not very honorable nor consistent with their former principles and professed zeal for maintaining the same4 ,which agreement was made up1 without any evidence of the above author's retracting his lax principles1 contained in the foresaid sermon4 ,whatever was the cause1 whether from the influence of others 7as was said by the publisher of their agreement71 or from a consciousness of dropping part of formerly received principles1 is not certain2 but one of these brethren1 for a time1 gave up with further practical communion with the other1 namely1 ,mr4 ,hugh ,innes1 late of the ,calton1 ,glasgow2 while yet it was observed1 that both used a freedom1 not formerly common to them1 anent the present authority1 in their public immediate addresses to the object of worship2 which1 together with their apparent resiling from part of their former testimony occasioned stumbling to some of their people1 and terminated in the separation of others4 ,foresaid latitudinarianism and falling away1 is also sadly verified1 in the conduct of another principal member of their pretended ,presbytery1 who has professedly deserted all testimony bearing for the reformation principles of the ,covenanted ,church of ,scotland4#e ,at last1 after their declared interviews for that purpose1 these brethren have patched up a mank agreement1 which they have published1 in a paper entitled ,abstract of the covenanted principles of the ,church of ,scotland1 c41 with a prefixed advertisement in some copies1 asserting the removal of their differences1 which arose from a sermon on ,psal4 cxxii1 #c1 published at ,glasgow1--by a disapprobation of what is implied in some expressions hereof1 viz41 ,that all the members of ,christ's mystical body may1 and ought to unite in visible church communion4 ,here is1 indeed1 a smooth closing of the wound that should have been more thoroughly searched1 that1 by probing into the practical application of said sermon1 the corrupt matter of communion with the ,revolution ,church1 in the gospel and sealing ordinance thereof1 might have been found out2 but not one word of this in all that abstract1 which contains their grounds of union1 and terms of communion4 ,nothing of the above author's recanting his former latitudinarian practices of hearing1 and thereby practically encouraging1 that vagrant ,episcopalian1 ,whitefield2 his communicating1 which natively implies union1 with the ,revolution ,church1 in one of the seals of the covenant2 nor his public praying for an ,erastian government1 in a way1 and for a reason1 that must needs be understood as an homologation of their authority4 ,on which accounts1 the ,presbytery testify against said union1 as being inconsistent with faithfulness in the cause of ,christ2 and against said abstract1 as1 however containing a variety of particulars very just and good1 yet bearing no positive adherence to1 nor particular mention of1 faithful wrestlings and testimonies of the martyrs and witnesses for ,scotland's covenanted cause4 ,as also1 they testify against the notorious disingenuity of their probationer1 who1 after a professed dissatisfaction on sundry occasions1 with the declining steps of said brethren1 particularly with the declaimer against bigotry1 has overlooked more weighty matters1 and embraced a probability of enjoying the long grasped for privilege of ordination1 though it should be observed at a greater expense than that of disappointing the expectation of a few dissatisfied persons1 who depended upon his honesty1 after they had broken up communion with those he continues still to profess his subjection unto4 ,and further1 the ,presbytery testify against the adherents of foresaid brethren1 in strengthening their hands in their course of separation from the ,presbytery1 rejecting both their judicial and ministerial authority1 and the ordinances of the gospel dispensed by them4 ,and more especially1 the ,presbytery condemn the conduct of such of them as1 professedly dissatisfied with the above said left-hand extremes1 and other defections of foresaid brethren1 have therefore broken off from their communion2 yet1 instead of returning to their duty in a way of subjecting themselves to the courts of ,christ1 and ordinances instituted by him in his church1 have turned back again to their own right-hand extremes of error1 which once they professedly gave up1 but now persist in1 an obstinate impugning the validity of their ministerial authority and protestative mission1 undervalue the pure ordinances of the gospel dispensed by them1 and live as if there were no church of ,christ in the land1 where they might receive the seals of the covenant1 either to themselves or their children2 and therefore1 in the righteous judgment of ,god1 have been left to adopt such a dangerous and erroneous system of principles1 as is a disgrace to the profession of the covenanted cause4#f ,,advertisement4 ,the following supplement1 having been a competent length of time before the church in overture1 was adopted in ,logan county1 ,ohio1 ,may1 #ahej4 ,and1 although without the formality of a judicial sanction1 we trust it will not be found destitute of divine authority4 ,the design of it is to show the application of the principles of our ,testimony to society1 as organized in the ,united ,states4 ,for although conventional regulations1 civil and ecclesiastical1 in this land1 are very different from the condition of society in ,great ,britain1 where our ,testimony was first emitted1 yet the corruptions of human nature1 embodied in the combinations of society1 are not less visible in this than in other lands1 nor less hostile to the supreme authority of the ,lord and his ,anointed4 ,the beast and the false prophet continue to be the objects of popular devotion3 ,rev4 xix1 #bj4 ,cincinnati1 ,nov4 #abth1 #ahej4 ,,supplement ,,to ,,part ,,iii1 ,containing an application of the principles of our ,covenanted ,testimony to the existing condition of society in these ,united ,states4 ,the controversy which arose between the ,associate and ,reformed churches1 on the doctrine of civil magistracy1 was the occasion of greater divergency between them1 on collateral subjects4 ,from false principles1 consistent reasoning must produce erroneous conclusions4 ,assuming that the ,son of ,god1 as ,mediator1 has nothing to do with the concerns of ,god's moral government beyond the precincts of the visible church1 it would follow1 that church members1 as citizens of the kingdoms of this world1 neither owe him allegiance nor are bound to thank him for common benefits4 ,the assumption is1 however1 obviously erroneous1 because1 as ,mediator1 he is head over all things to the church1 ,eph4 i1 #bb1 consequently1 all people1 nations and languages1 are bound to obey and serve him1 in this office capacity1 and to thank him for his mercies4 ,while this controversy was keenly managed by the respective parties in the ,british isles1 the ,lord ,christ interposed between the disputants1 as it were1 to decide the chief point in debate4 ,by the rise of the ,british colonies west of the ,atlantic1 against the parent country1 and their successful struggle to gain a national independence1 a clear commentary was furnished on the long-contested principle1 that1 in some cases1 it is lawful to resist existing civil powers4 ,seceders1 forgetting1 for the time1 their favorite theory1 joined their fellow colonists in casting off the yoke of ,british rule4 ,those who vehemently opposed ,reformed ,presbyterians1 for disowning the ,british government1 joined cheerfully in its overthrow4 ,how fickle and inconsistent is man6 ,during the revolutionary struggle might be witnessed the singular spectacle--humbling to the pride of human reason1 revolting to the sensibilities of the exercised ,christian--brethren of the same communion1 on opposite sides of the ,atlantic1 pleading with the ,god of justice to give success to the respective armies6 ,east of the ocean the petition would be1 ,lord1 prosper the ,british arms2 on the west1 ,lord1 favor the patriots of these oppressed colonies6 ,such are the consequences natively resulting from a theory alike unscriptural and absurd--a principle deep-laid in that system of opposition to the ,lord and his ,anointed1 emphatically styled ,the ,antichrist4 ,great national revolutions are special trials of the faith and patience of the saints4 ,no firmness of character will be proof against popular opinion and example at such a time1 without special aid from on high4 ,reformed ,presbyterians in the colonies rejoiced in the success of the revolution1 issuing in the independence of the ,united ,states4 ,their expectation of immediate advantage to the reformation cause was too sanguine4 ,a new frame of civil polity was to be devised by the colonies1 now that they were independent of the ,british crown4 ,this state of things called forth the exercise of human intellect1 in more than ordinary measure1 to meet the emergency4 ,frames of national policy are apt to warp the judgment of good men4 ,even ,christian ministers are prone to substitute the maxims of human prudence for the precepts of inspiration4 ,many divines conceived the idea of conforming the visible church to the model of the ,american republic4 ,the plan was projected and advocated1 of bringing all evangelical denominations into one confederated unity1 while the integral parts should continue independent of each other4 ,this plan would have defeated its own object1 the unity of the visible church1 and subverted that form of government established by ,zion's ,king4 ,upon trial by some of the ,new ,england ,independents and ,presbyterians1 the plan has proved utterly abortive4 ,prior to the ,revolutionary war1 a ,presbytery had been constituted in ,america1 upon the footing of the covenanted reformation4 ,the exciting scenes and active sympathies1 attendant on the ,revolutionary war1 added to a hereditary love of liberty1 carried many covenanters away from their distinctive principles4 ,the ,reformed ,presbytery was dissolved1 and three ministers who belonged to it1 joining some ministers of the ,associate ,church1 formed that society1 since known by the name of the ,associate ,reformed ,church4 ,the union was completed in the year #aghb1 after having been five years in agitation4 ,these ministers professed1 as the basis of union1 the ,westminster standards2 but the abstract of principles1 which they adopted as the more immediate bond of coalescence1 discovered1 to discerning spectators1 that the individuals forming the combination1 were by no means unanimous in their views of the doctrines taught in those standards4 ,indeed1 there were certain sections of the ,confession reserved for future discussion1 which1 in process of time1 were wholly rejected4 ,this attack upon a document1 venerable not so much for its age as its scriptural character1 gave rise to zealous opposition by some in the body1 and ultimately resulted in a rupture4 ,two ministers dissented from the majority1 left their communion1 and proceeded to erect a new organization1 styled ,the ,reformed ,dissenting ,presbytery4 ,this was in the year #ahja4 ,at this date1 there were four denominations1 in the ,united ,states1 claiming to be the legitimate successors of the ,british reformers1 viz41 the ,associate1 ,reformed1 ,associate ,reformed1 and ,reformed ,dissenting ,presbyterians4 ,three of these professedly appear under the banner of a standing judicial testimony1 which they severally emitted to the public4 ,the ,associate ,reformed ,church1 by judicial declaration and uniform practice1 is opposed to this method of testimony-bearing4 ,the ,reformed ,presbytery1 which had been dissolved by the defection of the ministry1 during the ,revolutionary war1 was reorganized toward the close of the eighteenth century4 ,the troubles in ,ireland1 when the inhabitants united for the purpose of gaining independence of the ,british crown1 were the occasion of bringing strength to the church in ,america4 ,reformed ,presbyterians1 feeling sensibly with others the arm of ,british tyranny1 joined interests hastily with ,papists and others1 in one sworn association1 for the purpose of overturning the existing government by force of arms4 ,the enterprise1 as might have been expected1 was unsuccessful2 ,isa4 viii1 #aa1 #ab2 ,obadiah #g2 #b ,cor4 vi1 #ag4 ,many fled to the asylum which ,god had provided1 shortly before1 in ,america4 ,among the refugees were some of the ,covenanters1 by which the church was strengthened in her ministry and membership4 ,early in the nineteenth century1 measures were taken by the ,reformed ,presbytery1 in the ,united ,states1 for re-exhibiting the principles of a covenanted reformation1 in a judicial way4 ,accordingly1 in the year #ahjf1 the ,presbytery published1 as adopted1 a work entitled ,reformation ,principles ,exhibited--a book which has ever since been popularly called the ,american ,testimony4 ,the familiar designation1 ,testimony1 the general complexion of the book1 the orthodox aspect of terms1 and even most of the leading sentiments of the work1 gave it currency1 and rendered it generally acceptable to pious and intelligent ,covenanters4 ,and however it seemed to the unsuspecting to sustain1 it eventually and effectually supplanted the ,scottish ,testimony4 ,the men who had the principal hand in giving shape and direction to the principles and practice of ,covenanters in the ,united ,states1 at that time1 were located in some of the most populous and commercial cities on the ,atlantic coast1 where temptations to conform to this world were many and pressing4 ,a disposition to temporize was manifested in these localities1 soon after their principles had been judicially exhibited4 ,the last war between the ,united ,states and ,england1 subjected ,covenanters to new trials in ,america4 ,as aliens1 they were deemed unsafe residents at the seaboard1 and were ordered1 by the government1 to retire a certain distance to the interior 7much like the course pursued by ,claudius ,caesar toward the ,jews1 ,acts xviii1 #b74 ,to meet the exigency1 a deputation of the church was appointed to repair to ,washington1 in #ahab1 and offer a pledge that they would defend the integrity of the country against all enemies4 ,this measure was1 however1 never carried out4 ,the church increased in numbers and influence1 and began to be noticed with respect and professions of esteem among surrounding denominations4 ,some of her members had ventured to act in the capacity of citizens of the ,united ,states1 by serving on juries4 ,this was of course managed for a time clandestinely4 ,at length1 waxing confident by success1 they began to act more openly4 ,this gave rise to a petition addressed to the supreme judicatory of the church4 ,the petitioners were answered by instructing them to apply for direction to the inferior judicatories--thus shunning the duty of applying their own acknowledged principles4 ,this was in the year #ahbc4 ,this course did not satisfy the petitioners1 and application was again made to ,synod in #ahbe1 to explain the import of their former ,act4 ,the reply was--,this ,synod never understood any act of theirs1 relative to their members sitting on juries1 or contravening the old common law of the church on that subject2 a response obviously as equivocal as the preceding4 ,as early as #ahbc1 a motion was made in the ,synod to open a correspondence with the judicatories of other denominations4 ,this motion was resisted1 and for the time proved abortive4 ,at next meeting of ,synod1 however1 the measure was brought before that body1 by a proposal from the ,general ,assembly to correspond by delegation4 ,this proposal found many1 and some of them able1 advocates in the ,reformed4 ,p4 ,synod4 ,the measure was1 however1 again defeated2 but immediately after the failure1 a number of ministers forsook the ,reformation ranks and consorted with the ,general ,assembly4 ,in the year #ahbh1 the ,synod gave its sanction and lent its patronage to the ,colonization ,society1 which was continued till the year #ahcf1 when its patronage was transferred to the cause of ,abolition4 ,the spirit of declension became manifest at the session of ,synod in #ahca1 when some of the most prominent and practical principles of the ,reformed ,church were openly thrown into debate1 in the pages of a monthly periodical1 under the head of ,free ,discussion4 ,through the pernicious influence of that perfidious journal1 sustained by the patronage of ministers of eminent standing in the church1 a large proportion--neatly one-half--of the ministry were prepared1 by the next meeting of ,synod in #ahcc1 to renounce the peculiar principles and long known usages of the ,reformed ,covenanted ,church4 ,organizing themselves as a separate body1 yet claiming their former ecclesiastical name1 they deliberately incorporated with the government of the ,united ,states1 and some of the senior ministers1 more fully to testify their loyalty1 in their old age1 took the oath of naturalization6--thus breaking down the carved work which they had for many years assiduously labored to erect4 ,it was hoped that the severe trial to which the professing witnesses of ,christ were subjected at that time1 would have taught them a lesson not soon to be forgotten4 ,it was thought by many that the church was now purged from the leaven which had almost leavened the whole lump4 ,the ,synod met in #ahcd1 when a perverse spirit was evident in the midst of its members4 ,the ,colonization and ,abolition ,societies1 with other associations--the exfoliations of ,antichrist--had evidently gained an ascendency in the affections of many of the members4 ,the altercation and bitterness with which the claims of these societies were discussed1 evidenced to such as were free from their infection1 that some of those present viewed these popular movements as transcending in importance1 the covenanted testimony of the church4 ,as the practice of occasional hearing was on the increase in some sections of the church1 ,synod was memorialized on that subject1 but refused to declare the law of the church4 ,the old spirit of conformity to the world was still more manifest in #ahcf1 when ,synod was importuned by her children1 from the eastern and western extremes of the church1 by petition1 memorial1 protest and appeal--growing out of the practice then generally prevalent of incorporating with the voluntary associations of the age4 ,the response of the supreme judicatory was in this case as ambiguous as on any former occasion4 ,the backsliding course of the factious majority was but feebly counteracted by dissent from only two members of ,synod2 a respectable minority having been outwitted by the carnal wisdom of those who were prompt in applying the technicalities of law4 ,hope was1 however1 cherished1 that this check so publicly given1 together with the practical workings of the system of moral amalgamation1 would induce even reckless innovators to pause--to consider their ways and their doings4 ,this hope1 however rational and sanguine1 was totally disappointed in #ahch1 when the table of the supreme judicatory might be said to be crowded with petitions1 letters1 remonstrances1 memorials1 protests and appeals4 ,the just grievances of the children of witnessing and martyred fathers1 were treated with contempt--laid on the table1 returned1 with the cry let them be kicked under the table1 c4 ,and when some attempted to urge their right to be heard1 they were called to order1 treated with personal insult1 or subjected to open violence4 ,a few of these1 having thus experienced the tyranny and abuse of the ruling faction1 declined the authority and communion of ,synod1 and established a separate fellowship4 ,when the ,synod again met in #ahdj1 the same measures which had been carried by mob violence at the preceding meeting1 were pressed as before2 but with less tumult--leaders having learned caution from the consequences following their former outrageous conduct4 ,matters had now come to a crisis1 when a reclaiming minority were reduced to this dilemma--either to acquiesce in the almost total subversion of the covenanted constitution of the church2 or1 by separating from an irreclaimable majority1 attempt1 by an independent organization1 to make up the breach4 ,it is easy to see which alternative was duty1 not only from the nature of the case1 but from the well defined footsteps of the flock4 ,reformation has been effected in the church of ,god in all ages1 by the protestation and separation of a virtuous ,minority4 ,at this juncture a paper was laid upon the table of ,synod1 of which the following is a true copy3 ,,preamble ,,and ,,resolutions4 ,whereas1 ,it is the province and indispensable duty of this ,synod1 when society is in a state of agitation as at present1 to know the signs of the times and what ,israel ought to do3 and whereas it is also the duty of this ,synod1 to testify in behalf of truth1 to condemn sin and testify against those who commit it2 to acquaint our people with their danger1 and search into the causes of ,god's controversy with them and with us3 and whereas it is the duty of ,synod further1 to point out to the people of ,god the course to be pursued1 that divine judgments may be averted or removed--therefore1 #a4 ,resolved1 ,that uniting with1 or inducing to fellowship1 by the members of the ,reformed ,presbyterian ,church1 in the voluntary and irresponsible associations of the day--composed of persons of all religious professions and of no profession--be condemned1 as unwarranted by the word of ,god1 the subordinate ,standards of the church1 and the practice of our covenant fathers4 #b4 ,that an inquiry be instituted1 in order to ascertain the grounds of ,god's controversy with us1 in the sins of omission and commission1 wherewith we are chargeable in our ecclesiastical relations4 #c4 ,that the sins thus ascertained1 be confessed1 mourned over and forsaken1 and our engagement to the contrary duties renewed2 that the ,lord may return1 be entreated of his people and leave a blessing behind him4 ,this paper was instantly laid on the table2 and when1 at a subsequent session of the court1 it was regularly called up for action1 it was again and finally laid on the table6 ,ever since that transaction1 this paper has been diligently misrepresented1 as consisting only of one resolution1 and that the first1 contrary to its own evidence4 ,after the final adjournment of ,synod1 those individuals who1 as a minority1 had opposed the innovations and backslidings of their brethren1 embraced an opportunity for consultation4 ,it appeared that without preconcert1 they were unanimous that all legal means having failed to reclaim their backsliding brethren1 who constituted a large majority of ,synod2 both duty and necessity required them to assume a position independent of former organizations1 that they might1 untrammeled1 carry out practically their testimony4 ,accordingly two ministers and three ruling elders proceeded to constitute a ,presbytery on constitutional ground1 declaring in the deed of constitution1 adherence to all reformation attainments4 ,this transaction took place in the city of ,alleghany1 ,june #bdth1 #ahdj4 ,the declining majority continued their course of backsliding1 following those who had relinquished their fellowship with slanderous imputations and pretended censure1 as is usual in such cases4 ,since that time1 there are no evidences given by them either of repentance or reformation4 ,the ,synod of ,scotland has for many years been in a2 course of declension1 in many respects very similar to that of ,america4 ,as early as the year #ahae1 some ministers of that body began to betray a disposition to accommodate their profession to the taste of the world4 ,the judicial testimony emitted by their fathers was represented as too elaborate and learned to be read and understood by the common reader1 and too severe in its strictures upon the principles and practice of other ,christian denominations4 ,the abstract of terms of communion was viewed as too strict and uncharitable1 especially the ,auchensaugh ,covenant became particularly obnoxious4 ,by a persevering importunity for a series of years this degenerating party prevailed so far in the ,synod as to have the ,auchensaugh ,deed expunged from the symbols of their profession4 ,this was accomplished in #ahbb2 and1 taken in connection with other movements indicating a prevailing spirit of worldly conformity1 this outrage upon the constitution of the ,reformed ,presbyterian ,church1 gave rise to a secession from the body1 by the oldest minister in the connection1 and a considerable number of others1 elders and members4 ,at the above date1 the ,rev4 ,james ,reed declined the fellowship of the ,scottish ,synod2 and he maintained the integrity of the covenanted standards in a separate communion till his death3 declaring at his latter end1 that he could not have laid his head upon a dying pillow in peace1 if he had not acted as he did in that matter4 ,deaf to the remonstrances of this aged and faithful minister1 his former brethren pursued their perverse and downward course1 until their new position became apparent by the adoption of a ,testimony and ,terms of ,communion adapted to their taste4 ,their ,testimony was adopted in #ahcg4 ,this document ostensibly consists of two parts1 historical and doctrinal2 but really only of the latter as authoritative4 ,this will appear from the preface to the history1 as also that it is without the formal sanction of the ,synod1 which appears prefixed to the doctrinal part of the book4 ,a considerable time before they ventured to obtrude this new ,testimony on the church2 they had prepared the way for its introduction1 by supplanting the authoritative ,rules of ,society1 framed and adopted by their fathers4 ,this was done by issuing what they called a ,guide to ,social ,worship1 which the ,scottish ,synod sent forth under an ambiguous recommendation1 and the spurious production was republished by order of ,synod1 in ,america1 #ahcf1 with the like equivocal expression of approbation4 ,what has been just related of the ,ref4 ,pres4 ,church in ,scotland1 will apply substantially to that section of the same body in ,ireland4 ,on the doctrine of the magistrate's power circa sacra1 however1 there was a controversy of several years' continuance and managed with much asperity1 in which ,rev4 ,messrs4 ,john ,paul1 ,d4,d41 and ,thomas ,houston were the most distinguished disputants4 ,their contendings issued in breach of organic fellowship in #ahdj4 ,indeed the sister-hood which had subsisted for many years among the ,synods east and west of the ,atlantic ocean1 was violated in #ahcc2 when the rupture took place in the ,synod of ,america1 by the elopement of the declining party1 who are since known by alliance with the civil institutions of the ,united ,states4 ,among these five ,synods1 the principle called elective affinity has been strikingly exemplified2 while what the ,scripture denominates schism1 has been as visibly rampant as perhaps at any period under the ,christian dispensation4 ,this brief historical sketch may serve to show the outlines of the courses respectively pursued by the several parties in the ,british ,isles and ,america1 who have made professions of attachment to that work in the kingdom of ,scotland especially1 which has been called the ,second ,reformation4 ,but the duty of fidelity to ,zion's ,king1 and even the duty of charity to these backsliding brethren2 together with the informing of the present and succeeding generations1 require1 that we notice more formally some of the more prominent measures of these ecclesiastical bodies and so manifest more fully our relation to them4 ,it is not to be expected however1 that we are about to condescend upon all the erroneous sentiments or steps of defection1 supplied by the history of these communities4 ,to direct the honest inquiries of the ,lord's people1 and assist them in that process of reasoning by which facts are compared with acknowledged ,standards1 supreme and subordinate1 that their moral character may be tested1 is all that is proposed in the following sections4 ,,section ,i4 ,the ,secession from the ,revolution ,church of ,scotland in that country assumed a position in relation to the civil institutions of ,great ,britain1 which their posterity continue too occupy until the present time in the ,united ,states without material alteration4 #a4 ,they cooperate practically with all classes in the civil community1 in maintaining national rebellion against the ,lord and his ,anointed4 ,they give their suffrages toward the elevation of vile persons to the highest places of civil dignity in the ,american confederacy--knowing the candidates to be strangers or enemies to ,immanuel4 ,and although they have recently lifted a testimony against that system of robbery called slavery1 which is so far right2 yet this fact only goes to render their professed loyalty to an unscriptural frame of civil government1 as manifestly inconsistent as it is impious4 #b4 ,the have all along in the ,united ,states renounced the civil part of the ,british ,covenants1 declaring that they neither have nor ever had anything to do with them4 ,truth is not local1 nor does the obligation of the second table of the moral law1 on which that part of our covenants is plainly founded1 depend on the permanency of our residence in a particular portion of the world4 ,the earth is the ,lord's and the fullness thereof4 ,it follows1 that however solemnly or frequently they profess to renew their fathers' covenants2 the whole transaction displays their unfaithfulness to the ,lord1 who is a party in the covenants2 and is calculated to mislead the unwary4 #c4 ,their unsteadfastness is further evidenced1 by conforming to other ecclesiastical communities in the loose practice of occasional or indiscriminate hearing2 and even in some instances of ministerial intercommunion--the law of their church on that matter having become obsolete4 ,against these courses1 in some of which that body has obstinately persevered for more than a hundred years1 we deem it incumbent on us to continue an uncompromising testimony4 ,many comments the ,moral ,governor of the nations has furnished in his providence within the last century1 making still more intelligible the righteous claims of his word3 but ,seceders seem to have their moral vision obscured by a vail of hereditary prejudice4 ,we trust the ,lord is on his way to destroy the face of the covering cast over all people1 and the vail that is spread over all nations2 ,is4 xxv1 #g4 ,,sec4 ,,ii4 ,our testimony against the unfaithfulness of the ,associate ,reformed ,church1 continues also without material change since the rise of that body4 ,the following among others may here be noticed1 as constituting just grounds of opposition in a way of testimony-bearing1 by all who would be found faithful to the ,lord1 and their covenant engagements4 #a4 ,their very origin was unwarranted by scripture4 ,all the scriptural attainments to which they profess to adhere1 were already incorporated in the standards of the organic bodies1 from whose fellowship they seceded4 ,they did therefore make a breach without a definite object1 and multiply divisions in the visible body of ,christ without necessity4 ,thus they did violence to the royal law of love2 for while under a profession of charity they invited to their new fellowship their former brethren2 the nature of the case evinces a disposition to unmitigated tyranny4 ,this state of things we think has not been generally understood4 ,we shall here endeavor to render it intelligible4 ,the fact of organizing that church 7the ,associate ,reformed7 said to both ,covenanters and ,seceders ,it is your duty to dissolve your respective organizations1 and join us4 ,this is undeniable4 ,the ,covenanter or ,seceder replies by asking--,what iniquity have you or your fathers found in us1 that you forsook our communion8 c4 ,not any1 replies the ,associate ,reformed ,church2 only some trifling opinions peculiar to you severally which we deem unworthy of contending about4 ,only join our church1 and we will never quarrel with you1 relative to your singularities4 ,ah1 replies the other party1 the matters about which we differ1 are trifling in your account2 how then could they be of such magnitude as to warrant your breaking fellowship with us8 ,what you call trifles1 peculiarities1 c1 we cannot but still judge important principles1 sealed by the precious blood of martyrs3 must we deny these or bury them in silence1 to gain membership in your new church8 ,is this the nature and amount of your professed charity8 ,this is not that heaven-born principle 'that rejoiceth not in iniquity1 but rejoiceth in the truth4' ,you break fellowship for what you esteem mere trifles--you propose to us a new term of communion1 with which it is morally impossible that we should comply1 without doing violence to our consciences4 ,is this charity or tyranny8 #b4 ,although covenanting was declared by this body at their origin1 to be an important duty1 they never recognized the solemn deeds of their fathers as binding on them2 nor have they ever attempted the acknowledged duty in a way supposed to be competent to themselves4 ,nay1 the obligation of the ,british covenants has been denied both openly and frequently from the pulpit and the press2 and even attempts have been made1 not seldom1 by profane ridicule1 to bring them into contempt4 ,the very duty of public1 social covenanting1 either in a ,national or ecclesiastical capacity1 has been often opposed in the polemic writings of the ministers of this body1 however often inculcated and exemplified in the word of ,god4 ,the moral nature of the duty taken in connection with prophetic declarations1 to be fulfilled only under the ,christian dispensation1 demonstrates the permanency of this divine ordinance until the end of the world4 #c4 ,this church set out with unsound views of church fellowship1 as has been already in part made appear4 ,but when their position came to be more pointedly defined1 they made the novel distinction between fixed and occasional communion4 ,the practical tendency of this unscriptural experiment was necessarily to catholic communion1 which theory was soon advocated by some of the most prominent of the ministry2 and accordingly eventuated in the merging of a large number of her ministry and membership1 in the communion of the ,general ,assembly4 #d4 ,on the doctrine of the divine ordinance of civil government1 this church has all along been unsound2 as is fully evidenced in the practice of her members1 which has been similar to that of ,seceders4 ,our testimony against the latter is1 in this particular1 equally directed against the former4 #e4 ,this church has appeared as the advocate of a boundless toleration1 conforming her views and policy in a most servile manner to the infidel model presented in the civil constitutions of republican ,america4 ,it would seem1 indeed1 that this body aimed at conforming their ecclesiastical polity to that standard1 from the fact that the very symbol of their profession as a corporate body1 is designated the ,constitution of the ,associate ,reformed ,church--a designation which might be considered as militating against the supremacy of the ,holy ,scriptures4 ,in this ,constitution a sphere is assigned to conscience1 which is incompatible with due subjection to the ,supreme ,lawgiver4 ,as well might the will1 or any other faculty of the soul of man1 be invested with this impious supremacy1 and immunity from control1 by any authority instituted on earth by the only ,lord of conscience4 ,jehovah will rule the consciences of his creatures1 as well as their judgments and wills1 by his holy law1 in the civil commonwealth1 in the church and in the family4 #f4 ,the unfaithfulness of this body appears further1 in shunning to declare the divine right and unalterableness of ,presbyterial ,church ,government1 she testifies not against ,prelacy or ,independency4 ,if this church is ,presbyterial in practice1 it is on no better footing than that of the ,revolution ,church of ,scotland4 #g4 ,the purity of divine worship is not guarded by the terms of fellowship in this church4 ,it is true1 ,no ,hymns merely of human composure1 are allowed in her churches4 ,but what mean these guarded terms and phrases1 merely2 churches8 ,the best interpretation of these cunningly contrived expressions is supplied by the practice of those ministers of the body1 who scruple not to offer unto ,god hymns merely of human composure when occupying pulpits of other denominations1 or sojourning for a night in families where these hymns are statedly used4 ,it is known that this part of the order of public worship has been submitted in some instances1 to the voice of the congregation by their pastor2 thus manifesting in the same act1 latitudinarianism in regard both to the government and worship of the house of ,god4 ,lastly1 to specify no further--,laxity of discipline is observable in this church4 ,she has always admitted to her fellowship1 and to a participation in her special privileges 7the seals of the covenants71 persons who openly deny the divine warrant for a fast in connection with the celebration of the ,lord's ,supper2 yea1 who ridicule that part of the solemnity as superstitious6 ,the same privileges are granted in this church to such as habitually neglect the worship of ,god in the family4 ,nor does this church inculcate or enjoin1 as a part of ,christian practice1 fellowship meetings for prayer and conference4 ,we must1 as witnesses for the cause of ,christ1 solemnly protest against these sentiments and correspondent practices1 as inconsistent with the scripture and the reformation attainments of our covenant fathers4 ,,sec4 ,,iii4 ,the ,reformed ,dissenting ,church embraced more of the peculiar principles of the covenanted reformation than either of the two preceding4 ,on the doctrines of magistracy and toleration1 abstractly considered1 they have manifested commendable fidelity4 ,nevertheless1 in the practical application of these doctrines and in other respects1 we are constrained to continue a testimony against them4 #a4 ,what has been remarked of the origin of the ,associate ,reformed body1 is partly true also of the party which dissented from them3 their organization was uncalled for1 there being no scriptural attainment embraced by them1 which was not already exhibited under a judicial banner4 ,those who erected the ,reformed ,dissenting ,presbytery may have been harshly treated by ministers of the ,reformed ,presbytery1 when attempting negotiations for union1 as public fame has often rumored3 yet supposing this to have been the case1 multiplying separate fellowships was not a happy expedient for effecting union in the truth4 #b4 ,this body of ,christians have been all along unfaithful in applying their own avowed principles relative to magistracy4 ,their innovation in this respect would seem to have been a carnal expedient to reach a two-fold object3 the one1 to retaliate on the ,reformed ,church for supposed indignities offered2 the other1 to render themselves more popular in the eyes of other communities4 ,they admit that a constitution of civil government may be so immoral1 that it cannot be considered as ,god's ordinance2 that in such a case no ,christian can1 without sinning against ,god1 accept any office supreme or subordinate1 where an oath to support such a constitution is made essential to his office4 ,these admissions are equally just and important2 yet these concessions are wholly neutralized in practice by these people1 for they claim it as their privilege to choose others to fill those offices1 which they say1 they themselves cannot fill without sinning against ,god4 ,we must continue our earnest testimony against this attempt to separate in law1 between the representative and his constituents1 involving as it does1 if consistently carried out1 the total overthrow of the covenants of works and grace1 and ultimately of ,god's moral government by his annotated ,son6 ,the effort made to sustain their practice in this matter1 from the examples of the ,marquis of ,argyle and ,lord ,warriston1 is very disingenuous2 simply because the church of ,scotland had not at the date referred to1 reached the measure of her attainments on that head4 ,indeed1 the whole drift of their argument goes to justify the position1 that in some cases1 it is expedient to do evil that good may come4 #c4 ,on the doctrine of faith this church has1 we think1 darkened counsel1 by words without knowledge4 ,their distinctions and caveats relative to assurance1 are calculated rather to bewilder than enlighten the mind of the general reader4 ,receiving and resting on ,christ as offered in the gospel1 amounts to appropriation1 certainty1 assurance1 c4 ,there is evidence of a tendency to vain jangling here1 against which1 even suppose there be no error couched in the terms1 we ought to testify4 #d4 ,this church evinces a disposition to intercommunion1 in the practice both of ministers and members1 wholly inconsistent with steadfastness1 and at war with her own declared views of toleration4 ,occupying pulpits in common with more corrupt communities1 doing this in connection with the celebration of the ,lord's ,supper1 and attendance and co-operation with others in conventional proceedings among those who style themselves ,reformed ,churches1 are practices among these people1 on which we feel constrained to animadvert with decided disapprobation4 ,as also their violation of the form of ,presbyterian church government by one minister with ruling elders presuming to set apart candidates to the office of the holy ministry4 ,,sec4 ,,iv4 ,to speak thus publicly against those who may be the precious sons of ,zion1 is a painful duty4 ,that charity1 however1 which rejoiceth in the truth1 requires of ,christ's witnesses that they censure and rebuke1 in a way competent to them1 those of the household of faith whom they see and know to be in a course of error or of sin2 ,isa4 lviii1 #a2 ,tit4 i1 #ac4 ,many of those with whom we were wont to take pleasure in displaying a banner jointly1 and in a judicial capacity1 are now1 alas6 arrayed against us4 ,to the real friend of ,jesus1 and the truth as it is in ,jesus1 there cannot be a more lamentable spectacle than the professed witnesses of the ,lamb disposed in rank under hostile colors as the company--not of two1 but of many armies1 ready to engage in mutual destruction6 ,and indeed those who bite and devour one another1 are in danger of being consumed one of another4 ,the ,lord is righteous in all that is come upon us2 for we have sinned against him--both we and our fathers4 ,we know not how to avert more wrath from the ,lord1 reclaim backsliders1 confirm the wavering1 direct sincere inquirers1 apprise the unsuspecting of their danger1 and exonerate our own consciences1 otherwise than by giving open1 candid and honest testimony for ,christ and truth1 against those1 even once brethren by covenant bonds1 who have dishonored him1 and caused the way of truth to be evil spoken of4 ,against those who separated from us in ,philadelphia1 #ahcc1 erecting a rival judicatory1 and dishonestly claiming the name ,reformed ,presbyterian ,church1 we bear our feeble testimony for the following among other reasons3 #a4 ,they did then openly enter on a course subversive of our whole covenanted system of doctrine and order1 by withdrawing their dissent from the civil institutions of the ,united ,states1 and incorporating with the ,national ,society--knowing the same to be1 by the terms of the national compact1 opposed in many respects1 both to godliness and honesty4 #b4 ,this party had1 in a clandestine way1 exerted their influence to seduce and draw away disciples after them for a series of years4 ,this is evident from the petitions addressed to ,synod on the jury law1 issuing from those who are known to have been in correspondence with some of the leaders in that defection4 #c4 ,this party are chargeable with mutilating the ,judicial ,testimony emitted in ,scotland1 #agfa2 and also with changing the terms of communion1 and obtruding a mutilated formula upon an unsuspecting people1 contrary to due order4 ,history and argument are excluded from the terms of ,church ,fellowship1 on the very face of ,reformation ,principles ,exhibited2 and the ,auchensaugh ,covenant expunged from the formula of terms of communion1 without submitting them in overture to the people for inspection4 ,we say these steps of defection and apostasy are chargeable to the account of those who made the breach in #ahcc3 ,first1 ,because the senior and leading ministers in that separation were the men who framed the ,american ,testimony and ,terms of ,communion2 and so had many years before laid the platform and projected the course on which they violently entered at that date4 ,second1 ,these separatists1 in the edition of these symbols of their profession lately published1 have consistently left out of the volume1 the ,historical ,part1 and also remodeled the formula of ,terms of ,communion4 #d4 ,this body continues to wax worse and worse1 against all remonstrance from their former connections and others1 as also in the face of providential rebukes2--losing1 because forfeiting1 the confidence of conscientious and honorable men1 exemplified in the frequent meetings1 and to them1 disastrous results1 of the ,convention of1 so called1 ,reformed ,churches4 ,,sec4 ,v4 ,with the foregoing party may be classed those different and conflicting fellowships in ,scotland and ,ireland1 whose recent ,terms of ,communion and ,judicial ,testimony1 substantially identify with those mentioned in the preceding section4 #a4 ,public fame charges the ,eastern ,synod of ,ireland1 and the ,synod of ,scotland1 with connivance at the members and officers under their inspection1 in co-operating with the immoral and anti-christian government of ,great ,britain4 ,they are therefore guilty of giving their power and strength to that powerful and blood-thirsty horn of the beast4 ,we are inclined to give more credit to public fame in this than we would in many other cases1 because3 #b4 ,these ,synods have opened a door in their new ,testimony for such sinful confederacies4 ,what6 will the simple and uninitiated reader of the ,testimony ask1 does not that ,testimony declare1 often and often1 that the ,british constitution is anti-christian8 ,we answer1 the book declares so2 but we caution the reader to be on his guard1 lest he judge and take for granted1 without a careful examination1 that the book and the ,testimony are the same thing4 ,let the honest inquirer consult the preface to the ,historical part of the book1 and then the preface to the ,doctrinal part3 the latter1 he will find1 on due examination1 to constitute the ,testimony4 ,true1 in page #h of the preface to the volume1 it is said1 the ,testimony1 as now published1 consists of two parts1 the one ,historical and the other ,doctrinal4 ,this sounds orthodox2 but1 in the same page1 when these two parts come to be defined1 it is said1 when the church requires of those admitted into her fellowship1 an acknowledgement of a work like the present1 the approbation expressed has a reference to the principles embodied in it1 and the proper application of them1 c4 ,so they wrap it up--better than our fathers succeeded in a similar enterprise in ,america4 ,the truth is what they call the historical part is largely argumentative2 and both these parts are carefully and covertly excluded from the terms of fellowship6 ,we shall have occasion to recur to this subject1 as there are many others likeminded with these innovators4 #c4 ,these people are also deeply involved in the popular1 so called1 benevolent associations of the world1 ,sunday ,schools1 ,bible ,societies1 ,temperance ,reforms1 ,missionary ,enterprise1 c1 evidencing a wide departure from our covenanted uniformity1 based upon our covenanted ,testimony4 ,,sec4 ,,vi4 ,those who in #ahch1 on account of sensible tyranny1 growing out of defection on the part of the majority1 declined the authority of ,synod1 have shared all along in our sympathies2 and it has been our desire that they and we could see eye to eye in the doctrines and order of the house of ,god4 ,although this party promised fair for a time1 and apparently contended for all the attainments of a covenanted reformation1 in process of time it became apparent that they possessed not intelligence sufficient to manage a consistent testimony for that cause4 ,they seem to have been under the influence of temporary impulse1 arising from the experience of mal-administration2 rather than to have discovered any constitutional defection in the body from which they separated4 ,this is apparent indeed if we have access to any credible source of information relative to the principles they profess1 and their ,christian practice4 ,more particularly1 #a4 ,although that paper which they designate ,safety ,league1 has the sound of orthodoxy2 yet1 as originated1 and since interpreted by them1 there is a lamentable falling off from the attainments and footsteps of the flock4 ,first1 so far as we can ascertain1 that instrument had clandestine origin being framed and subscribed by those who were yet in fellowship with the ,synod6 ,this might be earnest1 but1 we think1 not honorable contending for the truth4 ,second1 when this paper comes to be interpreted by its framers and signers1 it seems to cover only the ,american ,testimony and ,terms1 as remodeled by breach of presbyterial order4 ,at other times1 it will conveniently extend to the ,scottish ,testimony1 #agfa1 and the ,auchensaugh ,deed1 #agab6 ,from which we infer that these people have no settled standards4 #b4 ,we testify against these people for unwarrantable separation from us4 ,one of their elders co-operated in organizing the ,reformed ,presbytery in #ahdj2 this in official1 and1 as then distinctly understood1 representative capacity4 ,yet1 some time afterward1 he and his brethren withdrew from said ,presbytery1 without assigning justifiable reasons4 #c4 ,efforts are known to have been made1 by some then in their fellowship1 to have social corresponding meetings established among them1 but without success2 in opposition to the well-defined example of our witnessing fathers1 whose example they affect to imitate4 ,lastly1 these quondam brethren are not1 to this day1 distinguishable1 in the symbols of their profession1 from any party who have more evidently and practically abandoned the distinctive principles and order of a covenanted ancestry4 ,there is no constitutional barrier in the way of their coalescence with any party1 whom interest or caprice may select4 ,,sec4 ,,vii4 ,against that party usually1 but improperly1 styled the ,old ,lights1 are we obliged to testify more pointedly than against any other party now claiming to be ,reformed ,presbyterians4 ,first1 because we believe there are among them still1 real ,covenanters2 and1 in proportion to the whole body1 a greater number of such than in any other fellowship4 ,these we would undeceive1 if the ,lord will2 for we earnestly desire renewed fellowship with all such on original ground4 ,second1 because the leaders among these make the fairest show in the flesh1 and1 calculating on spiritual sloth and the force of confirmed habit1 hope to lead honest people insensibly after them back into ,egypt4 ,third1 because they are more numerous1 and1 from habit1 more exemplary than other parties2 and therefore more likely to influence honest ,christians unwittingly to dishonor ,christ1 and gainsay his precious truth4 #a4 ,these former brethren acted1 in #ahcc1 very similar to the policy of the ,revolution ,church of ,scotland in #afhi4 ,instead of repairing the breaches made1 and going on to fortify our ,new ,testament ,jerusalem1 against the assaults of enemies in future1 they rested in their present position1 providing only for a new edition of ,reformation ,principles ,exhibited1 with a continuance of the history to that date4 ,it was urged1 at the time1 that the argumentative part of our ,testimony should be hastened to completion1 but without effect4 ,as the apostate ,assembly of ,scotland1 #afhi1 admitted unsound ministers1 curates1 c41 to seats in court2 so1 with the like politic design1 members were admitted to seats in ,synod1 #ahcc1 who claimed a right to withdraw to another party1 if they should see cause--yea1 one of these was called to the moderator's chair6 #b4 ,at next meeting1 #ahcd1 when the continuation of the historical part of the ,testimony was read1 and referred to a committee for publication in the forthcoming edition of ,reformation ,principles ,exhibited1 it was directed that the terms of communion should be inserted1 supplying the deficiency in the first term1 in these words3 and the alone infallible rule of faith and manners4 ,in the new edition these important words were omitted1 as before6 ,several ministers seemed to be influenced in social relations1 at that time1 more by public opinion1 than by the infallible rule4 ,no further progress was made with the argumentative part of the ,testimony1 and a petition from ,greenfield1 to have ,synod's mind relative to occasional hearing1 was returned4 ,against these steps of unfaithfulness we lift our protest4 #c4 ,against the tyranny manifested at the next meeting1 there were some to stand up at the time2 but the spirit of the world prevailed in all the important transactions4 ,we testify against those who refused to permit petitions1 memorials1 and other papers addressed to that court1 to be read4 ,especially do we protest against that satanical spirit evidenced in misrepresenting certain respectful and argumentative papers1 as being abusive1 insulting1 c43 also the unrighteous attempt1 by some guilty members of that court1 to stop the mouth of petitioners2 and we condemn the reason assigned for so doing1 viz41 ,they had no right to petition1 because they were under suspension6 ,this reason is worthy of double condemnation1 as coming from the mouth of him who1 in this instance1 acted the ecclesiastical tyrant1 and who would come down from ,zion's walls to the plains of ,ono1 mingle in political strife1 that he might open his mouth for the dumb2 and because a brother in covenant bonds would demur1 censure him1 and then make the fact of censure a reason why he should not be heard when petitioning for relief from such tyranny6 ,revolters are profound to make slaughter4 #d4 ,as papers were numerous on the table of ,synod in #ahch1 so they furnished occasion for displays of character and conduct1 humiliating to all lovers of ,zion1 who witnessed the transactions of that meeting of the supreme judicatory4 ,this was the first time1 so far as we know1 when that body was called upon formally to review and rectify1 in a way competent to them1 some parts1 both of the constitutional law and administration of the ,reformed ,presbyterian ,synod and ,church in ,america4 ,for a series of years1 and chiefly through the influence of leaders in that faction which separated from the body in #ahcc1 high-handed measures of tyranny had transpired3 and some of the subjects of that tyranny were yet writhing under a sense of accumulated wrongs2 others had1 by death1 been released from this species of persecution4 ,some thought it dutiful to call ,synod's attention to these matters1 and a petition was laid before them1 from ,rev4 ,robert ,lusk1 requesting that certain cases of discipline1 which the petitioner specified1 be reviewed2 and especially asking1 that the term testimony be restored to its former ecclesiastical use4 ,as this was1 in our deliberate opinion1 the most important measure brought under the cognizance of the church representative in ,america1 during the current of the nineteenth century1 it was thought the court would take the matter under deliberate consideration4 ,whether through ignorance of the matter proposed1 or that sectional interests engrossed the attention of parties1 or that the prevailing majority desired to be untrammeled in their future course1 the petition was smuggled through and shuffled by1 under the cognomen of a letter1 which a member of ,synod answered on behalf of the court1 as though it were a matter of the smallest importance imaginable6 ,we solemnly testify against this manner of disposing of a weighty matter at that time1 whether through inattention or design4 ,we protest also against the violent conduct of those ministers1 and others on the same occasion1 who made the place of solemn worship and judicial deliberation1 a scene of confusion1 by vociferations1 gesticulations and physical force1 in violation of ,god's law1 ordination vows1 and the first principle of ,presbyterian church government4 #e4 ,here we can advert only to a tithe of the fruits of darkness1 which had been increasing in quantity and bitterness1 since the meeting of ,synod in ,new ,york1 #ahch4 ,to carry out measures of worldly policy1 in #ahdj1 diligent electioneering was carried on during the intermediate time1 that the court might be what is technically called a packed ,synod4 ,that court was chiefly composed of such ministers and elders as were known to favor innovations2 and some who were known to be disposed to resist defection1 were excluded from seats in court4 ,against this dishonest1 partial and unjust measure1 we protest4 ,and here we lift our testimony against this course1 as having greatly retarded the ,lord's work for many years before1 and as having facilitated the introduction of error1 disorder and open tyranny1 in manifold instances1 during the same period4 #f4 ,we testify against the tyranny exercised upon ,james ,mc,kinney1 of ,coldenham1 who was not allowed to read his vindication and justification1 when he asked permission to do so1 from the published sentiments of some of those who condemned him666 ,also the cruelty practiced toward ,miss ,king1 an absent member1 whose representation of her case to the ,synod1 could not so much as be heard4 ,we bear testimony against those who in that ,synod would interrupt1 call to order--in violation of order--those members who were appearing in defense of injured truth1 and who were often silenced by tumult1 or the call of order by an obsequious moderator4 ,especially do we testify against the dishonesty and unfaithfulness of that body1 displayed by them in disposing of the paper inserted 7see p4 #acb71 calling ,synod's attention to what we firmly believe to be the source of all the error1 guilt and distractions incident or attending to that body for many years4 ,on the practice of confederating with the enemies of ,god1 we testify against this party1 not only for the fact of so confederating1 but also1 and chiefly1 for resisting the evidence of ,god's word1 often adduced in condemnation of the practice--refusing to hear the testimonies1 experience1 and reasoning of ,christ's witnesses and martyr's when cited from the ,cloud of ,witnesses1 ,informatory ,vindication1 ,gillespie on ,confederacies1 c2 and for obstinately going on in this trespass1 in the face of manifold convictions from living witnesses and providential rebukes4 ,as it respects ecclesiastical relations1 we testify against these former brethren for having wittingly1 perseveringly1 and presumptuously fostered schism in the visible church1 manifestly for carnal ends1 during many years4 ,it is notorious that five ,synods are in organic fellowship1 while hardly two of them will hold ministerial or sacramental communion6 ,what a picture does this state of things in the professing church of ,christ present to the infidel2 how hardening to the self-righteous and the openly profane6 ,and although conventional regulations be lightly looked upon by many1 not being based upon express words of scripture2 yet when framed and engaged to1 according to the general rules of scripture1 much sin is the result of violating them1 and trampling them under foot1 as has often been done by this body of people4 ,this has been the case in ,presbyteries1 subordinate ,synods1 and especially in the general ,synod4 ,subordinate ,synods have been dissolved by the action of the general ,synod after they had ceased to be2 and without consulting the ,presbyteries1 who alone were competent to decree or dissolve the delegation form of the general ,synod1 that court dissolved itself1 after having many years trampled upon the law of ,presbyteries fixing the ratio of delegation4 ,against such reckless1 disorderly procedure we testify as being the cause or occasion of much sin against ,zion's ,king1 and much suffering to his precious people4 ,finally--,we solemnly enter our protestation against this church1 as having taken the lead of most others in razing the very foundation stone of the covenanted structure4 ,all the evils that have befallen the professed friends of a work of reformation on both sides of the ,atlantic are traceable to a setting aside the footsteps of the flock from being terms of ecclesiastical communion4 ,it is now more than ten years since this important matter was expressly submitted to the ,old ,light ,synod's consideration1 and during the subsequent period1 in various forms1 the same has been pressed1 but without effect2 except as manifesting more fully their obduracy4 ,they refuse still to return1 ,ephraim-like1 going on frowardly in the way of their own heart4 ,that uninspired history ought to be incorporated among the terms of communion in the ,church of ,christ1 is a proposition which we firmly believe1 on the evidence both of reason and ,scripture1 although denied1 condemned1 and rejected by all pretenders to reformation attainments4 ,that history and argument are so rejected by all parties affecting to be reformed churches1 will appear from the following citations from their own authoritative judicial declarations3 ,authentic history and sound argument are always to be highly valued2 but they should not be incorporated with the confession of the ,church's faith4 ,the ,declaratory part is1 the ,church's standing ,testimony4--,ref4 ,prin4 ,exhibited1 preface--edition1 #ahce4 ,here history and argument are both excluded1 not only from the ,church's testimony but also from her confession6 ,this is the declared sentiment of ,old and ,new ,light ,covenants1 together with the ,safety ,league people--evidencing to all who are free from party influence1 that however they differ in practice1 on this all important point they perfectly harmonize in principle4 ,east of the ,atlantic1 among the three ,synods professing to follow the footsteps of the flock1 the declared sentiment is the same1 but then they differ from their brethren in practice--mingling with the heathen and learning their works without scruple4 ,in this respect they are more consistent than the other parties1 though more visibly corrupt4 ,the ,reformed ,dissenters prefix a ,narrative to their testimony1 thus rejecting history from testimony4 ,some advocates for union in conventions of reformed churches1 have plead for a historical introduction to their proposed testimony2 but they have carefully assured the public that this introduction shall constitute no term of union or communion4 ,thus1 it is evident1 that all the professed followers of the ,british ,reformers around us1 have cast off this reformation attainment from the standards of their professions severally4 ,we condemn this church-rending and soul-ruining sentiment1 and testify against all who maintain it1 for the following reasons3 ,first1 on their part it is inconsistent and self-contradictory4 ,they all say they are following the footsteps and holding the attainments of the ,scottish ,reformers4 ,but how do they discover these footsteps1 or how ascertain these attainments8 ,are they recorded in the ,bible8 ,no4 ,are they to be found elsewhere but in uninspired history8 ,certainly no where else4 ,yet all these parties absurdly reject uninspired history from their bonds of fellowship6 and still venture to tell the world1 they are holding fast these attainments66 ,this is solemn trifling1 profane mockery4 ,second4 ,this position is unsound and false in the light of reason4 ,all civilized nations1 as well as the ,jews1 have it written in their laws1 ,that the testimony of two men is true4 ,the witnesses do not need to be inspired to be credible4 ,we receive the witness of men1 although a false witness will utter lies4 ,no society can exist without practical recognition of the credibility of human testimony2 and this is especially true of the ,church of the living ,god1 which is the pillar and ground of the truth2 for1 ,third4 ,in the light of ,scripture1 her members cannot perform some of their most important duties1 either to ,god or to one another if they irrationally and wickedly relinquish this principle4 ,god's people are charged not to forget his mighty works2 ,psa4 lxxviii4 #g4 ,are these works all written in the ,bible8 ,they are required to confess their fathers' sins1 as well as their own4 ,since the divine canon was closed1 many sins have been1 and now are chargeable against professing ,christians4 ,are these recorded in the ,scriptures8 ,and thus the reader may ask himself of sin and duty to any extent1 in relation to ,god as a party4 ,and the same is true of the second table of the moral law4 ,for example3 in reference to the first commandment with promise1 should the ,christian minor be asked as the ,jew did his ,lord1 ,who is your father8 ,how shall he answer8 ,is he warranted to appeal to ,god to manifest his earthly sonship8 ,no2 but he is required by ,god's law to honor his father2 and his obedience to this command is grounded on human testimony as to the object to whom this honor is due4 ,thus consistency1 reason and scripture combine1 to accuse and fasten guilt--the guilt of apostasy upon all who have renounced that fundamental principle of our glorious covenanted reformation--that history and argument belong to the bond of ecclesiastical fellowship4 ,with any who hold the theory here condemned1 however exemplary or even conscientious in morals and religion they may appear1 we can have no ecclesiastical fellowship2 for1 however ardent their attachment or strong their expressions of affection to ,confession1 ,catechisms1 ,covenants1 c42 they give no guarantee of competent intelligence or probable stability2 as alas6 we see in the present declining course of many in our day4 ,we would earnestly and affectionably beseech all well wishers to a covenanted work of reformation3 that they would take into their serious consideration whether these things are1 or are not connected inseparably with the wellfare of ,zion4 ,especially would we expostulate with such as have any regard for the ,judicial ,testimony adopted at ,ploughlandhead1 ,scotland1 in #agfa3 that they conscientiously compare it with the book called ,reformation ,principles ,exhibited1 and also with the new ,scottish ,testimony1 where it is practicable1 and all these with the supreme standard1 the holy scriptures4 ,they will find on examination1 that these are wholly irreconcilable in the very form of testimony-bearing4 ,particularly1 let the reader notice that our fathers in #agfa1 considered history and argument as constituting their testimony3 and did not look upon doctrinal declaration as formal testimony at all4 ,look at the very title page of their ,testimony2 where you read1 ,act1 ,declaration and ,testimony1 plainly distinguishing between declaration and ,testimony4 ,now1 all innovators make doctrinal declaration their testimony1 reversing our fathers' order2 yea1 we would add ,god's order1 for he distinguishes between his law and testimony2 ,ps4 lxxviii1 #e-g2 cv1 #db-de4 ,god's special providences toward his covenanted people constitute his testimony by way of eminence2 ,exod4 xx1 #a1 c41 and their conduct under his providences constitute their testimony1 which must consist of history2 and by this and the blood of the ,lamb1 ,christ's witnesses are destined to overcome all anti-christian combinations4 ,in attempting thus to follow the approved example of our covenant fathers1 whose practice it was to testify not only against the corruptions of ecclesiastical1 but also of civil constitutions1 where their lot was cast1 we deem it incumbent on us to continue our testimony first published in #ahjf1 against the immoralities incorporated with the government of these ,united ,states4 ,believing that a nation as such1 is a proper subject of ,god's government1 and that those nations favored with his law as revealed in the holy scriptures1 are peculiarly required to regard the authority of the ,lord and his ,anointed1 therein made fully known3 it is with deep regret that we feel constrained to designate and testify against evils in the ,constitution of this nation4 ,notwithstanding numerous excellencies embodied in this instrument1 there are moral evils contained in it also1 of such magnitude1 that no ,christian can consistently give allegiance to the system4 ,there is not contained in it any acknowledgment of the ,christian religion1 or professed submission to the kingdom of ,messiah4 ,it gives support to the enemies of the ,redeemer1 and admits to its honors and emoluments ,jews1 ,mohammedans1 ,deists and ,atheists--it establishes that system of robbery by which men are held in slavery1 despoiled of liberty1 and property1 and protection4 ,it violates the principles of representation1 by bestowing upon the domestic tyrant who holds hundreds of his fellow creatures in bondage1 an influence in making laws for freemen proportioned to the number of his own slaves4 ,this constitution is1 in many instances1 inconsistent1 oppressive and impious4 ,much guilt1 and of long standing1 is chargeable against this nation1 for its cruel treatment of the colored race1 in subjecting them ever since #aghi to hopeless bondage2 its unjust transactions with the ,indian race1 and more recently waging an unjust war with a neighboring republic1 as would appear1 for the wicked purpose of extending the iniquitous system of slavery4 ,arise ,o ,god1 judge the earth3 for thou shalt inherit all nations4 ,,part ,,iv4 ,a brief declaration or summary of the principles maintained by the ,presbytery1 as to doctrine1 worship1 discipline1 and government1 in agreeableness to the word of ,god1 our ,confession of ,faith and ,catechisms1 and whole covenanted testimony of the ,church of ,scotland4--,the contrary doctrines condemned4 ,unto what has been more generally laid down in the preceding pages1 with respect to the principles and practice of this church and nation1 both in former and present times2 the ,presbytery proceed to subjoin a positive and explicit declaration of their principles anent the truths of our holy religion1 whether by the generality agreed unto1 or by some controverted4 ,i4 ,,of ,,god4--,the ,presbytery did1 and hereby do acknowledge and declare1 that there is one infinite1 eternal1 self-existent1 and independent ,being2 and that this only true and living ,god1 absolutely all-sufficient1 having all being1 perfection1 glory1 and blessedness1 in and of himself1 subsists in three distinct1 divine persons1 the ,father1 ,son1 and ,holy ,spirit 7in one and the same undivided essence and godhead71 all equally the same in substance1 power1 and glory1 although distinguished by their personal properties2 according to ,deut4 vi1 #d2 #a ,cor4 viii1 #f2 #a ,tim4 i1 #ag2 ,acts xvii1 #bd1 #be2 #a ,john v1 #g2 ,matth4 xxviii1 #ai2 ,confession of ,faith1 chap4 #b2 larger catechism1 quest4 #g--aa2 shorter catechism1 quest4 #d--f4 ,,ii4 ,,of ,,the ,,holy ,,scriptures4--,again1 they confess and declare1 that although the light of nature discovers unto us that there is a ,god1 yet of itself it is absolutely insufficient to teach us the saving knowledge of the invisible ,being and his will2 and therefore ,god of his infinite condescension has given us a most perfect revelation of himself and of his will in the scriptures of truth1 contained in the sacred books of the ,old and ,new ,testament2 which scriptures the ,presbytery assert to be of divine authority1 and not to be believed and received because of any other testimony1 than that of ,god their author1 who is truth itself4 ,which word of ,god is the alone perfect and complete rule1 both of faith and practice1 containing a full and ample revelation of the whole counsel of ,god1 both respecting his own glory and the salvation of men2 by which all spirits are to be tried1 and to which all doctrines and controversies in religion are to be brought1 as to the supreme judge1 in whose sentence alone we are to acquiesce2 according to ,rom4 i1 #ai1 #bj2 #a ,cor4 ii1 #ac1 #ad2 ,heb4 i1 #a2 #b ,tim4 iii1 #af2 #b ,pet4 i1 #ai1 #ba2 #b ,tim4 iii1 #ae2 ,gal4 i4 #h1 #i2 ,eph4 ii1 #bj1 and our standards1 ,confess4 chap4 #a2 larger ,cat4 quest4 #b-e2 shorter ,cat4 quest4 #b1 #c4 ,,iii4 ,,of ,,the ,,decrees ,,of ,,god4--,again1 they assert and maintain1 that ,jehovah1 according to his own most wise counsel1 and for his own glory1 has1 by one immanent act of his will from eternity1 purposed and decreed all events in time2 and particularly1 that by his absolute sovereignty1 he has unchangeably determined the final state of all intelligent beings1 visible and invisible4 ,that ,god of his mere good pleasure1 abstracting from all other causes whatever1 for the praise of his glorious grace to be manifested in time1 has from all eternity predestinated a certain definite number of mankind sinners1 in and through ,jesus ,christ1 to eternal life1 together with all the means leading thereunto4 ,and also1 by the same sovereign will1 has passed by1 and left others in their sins1 foreordaining them to bear the just punishment of their own iniquities2 as is evident from ,rom4 ix1 #aa1 #ac1 #ae1 #af1 #ah2 ,eph4 i1 #d1 #f1 #i1 #aa2 ,jude verse #d2 and according to ,confess1 chap4 #c2 larger ,cat4 quest4 #ab1 #ac2 shorter ,catechism quest4 #g4 ,,iv4 ,,of ,,creation4--,in like manner they acknowledge and declare1 that as ,god1 from the infinity of his being and goodness1 has communicated a finite created existence to all other beings1 framing them with natures wisely suited and adapted to the different ends of their creation2 so by the same all-powerful word whereby they were at first created1 he preserves and upholds all his creatures in their beings1 and by the incessant care and invariable conduct of his divine providence1 does constantly direct and overrule them and all their actions unto his own glory2 according to divine revelation1 ,gen4 i1 throughout2 ,col i1 #af2 ,rom4 xi1 #cf2 ,psal1 cxlv1 #ag1 and xxxiii1 #i2 and cxix1 #ia2 ,heb4 i1 #b1 #c2 ,confess1 chap4 #d1 #e2 larger ,cat4 quest4 #ad2 short4 ,cat4 quest4 #h4 ,likewise they profess and declare1 that ,god1 as the last and finishing part of his workmanship in this lower world1 created man an intelligent being1 endued with a living1 reasonable and immortal soul1 whose greatest glory consisted in his having the gracious image of his ,god and ,creator drawn upon his soul1 chiefly consisting in that knowledge1 righteousness and inherent holiness wherewith he was created4 ,and further1 that ,god1 in his favor and condescension to man1 was pleased to enter into a covenant with him1 as the public head and representative of all his posterity1 wherein ,god promised unto him eternal life and blessedness with himself in glory1 upon condition of personal1 perfect and perpetual obedience2 to the performance whereof1 he furnished him with full power and ability1 and threatened death upon the violation of his law and covenant1 as is evident from the sacred text2 ,gen4 i1 #bf1 #bg2 ,eccl4 vii1 #bi2 ,gen4 ii1 #ag2 ,rom4 x1 #e1 and according to our ,confess1 chap4 #d1 #b2 chap1 #g1 #a1 #b2 chap4 #ai1 #a2 larger ,cat4 quest4 #bj2 short4 ,cat4 quest4 #aj1 #ab4 ,v4 ,,of ,,the ,,fall ,,of ,,man4--,they again assert and maintain1 that the first and common parents of mankind1 being seduced by the subtilty of ,satan1 transgressed the covenant of innocency1 in eating the forbidden fruit2 whereby they lost the original rectitude of their nature1 were cut off from all gracious intercourse with ,god1 and became both legally and spiritually dead2 and therefore they being the natural root of all mankind1 and the covenant being made with ,adam1 not as a private1 but a public person1 all his descendants by ordinary generation1 are born under the guilt of that first sin1 destitute of original righteousness1 and having their nature wholly depraved and corrupted2 so that they are by nature children of wrath1 subjected unto all the penal evils contained in the curse of a broken law1 both in this life1 and in that which is to come2 ,gen4 iii1 #f1 #ac2 ,eccl4 vii4 #bj2 ,rom4 v1 from #ab to #bj2 ,rom4 iii1 #aj-ai2 ,eph4 ii1 #c2 ,confess1 chap4 #f3 larger ,cat4 quest4 #ba1 #bb1 short4 ,cat4 question #ac to #bj4 ,in like manner they assert and declare1 that all mankind1 by their original apostasy from ,god1 are not only become altogether filthy and abominable in the eyes of ,god's holiness2 but also1 are hereby utterly indisposed1 disabled1 and entirely opposite to all good1 the understanding become darkness1 and the will enmity and rebellion itself against ,god2 so that man1 by his fall1 having lost all ability of will to what is spiritually good1 cannot in his natural state1 and by his own strength1 convert himself 7being dead in trespasses and sins71 nor can he in less or more contribute to his own salvation1 or in the least prepare himself thereunto2 neither is there any natural1 necessary or moral connection between the most diligent and serious use of the means1 and obtaining salvation thereby4 ,although the ,presbytery maintain1 that as a ,god of grace has promised the converting influences of his ,spirit to be showered down upon dead souls1 in the use of means of his own appointment2 they are therefore to be attended to with the utmost care and diligence2 as appears from ,rom4 v1 #f2 ,john vi1 #dd1 #fe2 ,tit4 iii1 #c-e2 ,job xiv1 #d2 ,confess4 chap4 #i1 #c2 larger ,cat4 quest4 #be4 ,,vi4 ,,of ,,the ,,covenant ,,of ,,grace4--,likewise they assert and declare1 that ,jehovah1 in the person of the ,father1 having purposed to save a certain number of the ruined family of ,adam1 did from all eternity enter into a covenant transaction with ,jesus ,christ1 his eternal and only begotten ,son1 who contracted as the second ,adam1 in the name of all his spiritual seed4 ,in which covenant1 the ,father promising to confer eternal life upon a select number given unto ,christ1 upon condition of his fulfilling all righteousness for them2 the ,lord ,jesus ,christ did again stipulate and engage1 as the condition of the covenant by him to be fulfilled1 that in the fullness of time1 assuming the human nature into a personal union with the divine1 he would therein1 and in the elect's name fulfill1 not only the preceptive part of the law1 but also bear the whole punishment contained in the threatening thereof3 which covenant1 that it might be absolutely free to sinners1 and that the salvation therein provided for them1 might not be of debt1 but of grace1 was unto ,jesus ,christ a covenant of redemption1 nothing being therein promised to him1 but upon his paying a full price1 adequate to the most extensive demands of law and justice2 according to ,psal4 lxxxix1 #b1 #c1 #bh1 #cd1 #ce2 ,tit4 i1 #b2 ,isa4 liii1 #aj1 #aa2 ,matth4 v1 #ag2 ,confess4 chap4 #g1 #c2 ,larg4 ,cat4 quest4 #cj1 #ca2 ,short4 ,cat4 quest4 #bj4 ,,vii4 ,,of ,,the ,,mediator4--,in like manner they profess1 assert1 and declare1 that the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 the second person in the glorious and adorable ,trinity1 being by the ,father's appointment constituted mediator and surety of the new covenant1 did1 in the fullness of time1 assume the human nature1 consisting of a true body and reasonable soul1 into a personal union with his divine2 which two natures1 in the one person of our ,immanuel1 ,god-man1 remain distinct1 without conversion1 composition1 or confusion4 ,and being every way completely qualified and furnished for executing his mediatory offices of prophet1 priest1 and king1 was called to the exercise thereof1 by ,god the ,father1 who put all power and judgment into his hand1 and gave him commandment to execute the same2 ,prov4 viii1 #bc2 ,heb4 ii1 #ad2 #a ,tim4 ii1 #e2 ,john vi1 #bg1 and v1 #bg2 ,confess4 chap4 #h throughout2 ,larg4 ,cat4 quest4 #ba-bc2 short4 ,cat4 quest1 #ba1 #bb4 ,again1 they acknowledge and declare1 that the ,lord ,jesus ,christ our ,,redeemer1 the only begotten ,son of ,god1 by eternal and ineffable generation1 is most properly a divine person1 true and very ,god1 one in essence1 equal and the same in power1 eternity1 glory1 and all divine perfections with the ,father and ,holy ,ghost3 and that therefore it is most blasphemous to assert1 that the terms1 necessary existence1 and supreme deity1 and the title of the only true ,god1 do not belong to the ,son equally with the ,father1 as the same in substance1 being expressly contrary to these texts of sacred writ which assert the opposite truth2 ,john i1 #a-d2 ,phil1 ii1 #f2 ,john x1 #cj2 #a ,john v1 #bj1 and to our standards1 ,confess4 chap4 #h1 #b2 ,larg4 ,cat4 quest4 #cf2 ,short4 ,cat4 #f4 ,they likewise further acknowledge1 assert1 and declare1 that the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 the eternal ,son of ,god1 and only ,mediator between ,god and man1 being designed from everlasting the ,,redeemer of his people1 and having all fullness1 power1 and authority lodged in him for the execution of his mediatory trust1 has1 ever since the fall of mankind1 as the great and good shepherd of ,israel1 undertaken the care1 government1 protection1 and instruction of the ,church of ,god1 in agreeableness to the above said trust3 which he did all along under the ,old ,testament1 and still continues faithfully to discharge in all the parts thereof2 so that whatever revelation ,god made unto his church since the fall1 was by ,jesus ,christ as the great prophet and preacher of righteousness4 ,particularly1 it was he that first appeared unto lapsed man1 and as the great revealer of the council of peace1 called upon him in the voice of mercy1 saying1 ,adam1 where art thou8 ,it was he that1 pleasing himself in the forethoughts of his future incarnation1 and as a prelude thereto1 condescended at different times to appear in a human form1 and speak unto the fathers4 ,by him1 as the messenger of the covenant1 were the lively oracles delivered to the ,israelitish church2 and by his ,spirit in the prophets1 successively raised up to instruct his church in the knowledge of the divine will1 was signified and foretold the grace that should come1 until the fullness of the time appointed in the council of ,heaven1 when it was promised he should come1 and by his personal presence fill his house with glory4 ,then did ,god in these last days speak unto men by his ,son1 whom he has appointed heir of all things2 who1 not only by himself1 but also1 after his ascension1 by his evangelists and apostles filled with the ,spirit1 has made known all things that he heard of his ,father4 ,and now1 after the canon of scripture is completed1 and no new revelation to be expected to the end of time1 continues by his word and spirit to instruct sinners in the knowledge of all things necessary for their sanctification and salvation2 according to ,acts x1 #ch1 and iii1 #bb2 ,luke iv1 #ah1 #ba2 ,john i1 #ah2 #a ,pet4 i1 #aj-ab2 ,heb4 i1 #a1 #b2 ,eph4 iv1 #aa-ac2 ,confess4 chap4 #h1 #a2 ,larg4 ,cat4 quest4 #dc2 ,short4 ,cat4 quest4 #bd4 ,in like manner1 they profess and declare1 that the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 being called of him that said unto him1 ,thou art my ,son1 this day have ,i begotten thee1 unto the honorable office of ,high ,priest over the house of ,god1 and confirmed therein by all the solemnities of the oath of ,god1 he did most willingly undertake this work1 saying1 ,lo1 ,i come to do thy will1 ,o ,god6 ,and that he might finish and fulfill the same1 in agreeableness to his eternal engagements to the ,father1 to the ,old ,testament types and sacrifices1 promises and prophecies1 wherein he was foresigned and revealed to be the seed of the woman1 that should bruise the serpent's head1 did1 in the fullness of time1 humble himself to be made of a woman1 made under the law1 in the form of a bond servant to ,jehovah4 ,in which character1 he not only fulfilled the preceptive part of the law1 but also1 with the most unparalleled meekness1 patience and resignation1 submitted to the most grievous and dreadful sufferings1 both in body and soul1 even all that divine wrath1 indignation and punishment1 wrapped up in the terrible curse of a broken covenant of works4 ,by which obedience of his unto the death1 through the eternal ,spirit offering himself without spot unto ,god1 a proper1 real and expiatory sacrifice for sin1 he has fully satisfied divine justice1 made reconciliation for the iniquities of his people1 and purchased an eternal inheritance for them in the kingdom of glory4 ,the saving benefits of which redemption1 by the ,spirit's effectual application thereof1 he does1 by his intercession at the ,father's right hand1 as an arisen1 living1 and now glorified ,savior1 constantly and certainly communicate unto all those whom the ,father has given him4 ,further1 the ,presbytery declare1 that however they acknowledge the standing of the world1 as a theater to display the riches of divine grace1 the preaching of the gospel indefinitely to mankind sinners1 and all the common favors of life indifferently enjoyed by them1 do all result1 as native1 necessary and determined consequences1 from the interposition of ,christ in behalf of his spiritual seed1 and have their ultimate foundation in the infinite sufficiency1 fullness and perfection1 of the blood and sacrifice of ,christ1 ,god-man3 yet they affirm1 that1 as a certain elect and select number were given unto ,christ1 to be redeemed from among men1 so1 for their sakes alone1 he engaged his heart to approach unto ,god4 ,for their sakes1 he sanctified himself2 in their name1 i4e41 in their law-room and stead1 and for their good1 as the surety of the better covenant1 he became obedient unto death1 and endured the whole of that punishment threatened by the law1 and incurred by the transgression of it4 ,he subjected himself to that very curse1 bore that wrath and died that death1 which they themselves should have undergone4 ,and hereby1 by his doing and dying1 he made a proper1 real1 full and expiatory satisfaction to the justice of ,god for their sins4 ,wherefore it is impossible but that to all those for whom ,christ has purchased this complete redemption1 and for whose sins he has given this full satisfaction accepted of ,god1 he will certainly and effectually apply and communicate the same in the saving benefits thereof2 seeing that it is his will who has merited it1 that all those who are the ,father's choice by election1 and his purchase by redemption1 should be ever with him where he is1 that they may behold his glory2 and since1 as he is thus willing1 he is also able1 to save them to the uttermost that come to ,god by him4 ,so that all for whom ,christ died1 all that are redeemed by his blood1 are1 in consequence hereof2 effectually called1 justified1 sanctified and glorified2 according to ,psal4 xl1 #g1 #h2 ,heb4 x1 #e-aa2 ,phil4 ii1 #h2 ,gal4 iv1 #d1 #e2 ,heb4 ix1 #ad1 #bh2 ,dan4 ix1 #bd2 ,psal4 lxxv1 #c2 ,isa4 xlix1 #h2 ,john vi1 #cg1 #ci1 chap4 x1 #ae1 #af2 ,eph4 i1 #g2 ,rom4 viii1 #cd1 and ver4 #bi1 #cj2 ,john xvii throughout2 ,john xi1 #eb2 ,confess1 chap4 vii1 #d1 #e1 #h2 ,larg4 ,cat4 quest4 #dd2 ,sh4 ,cat4 quest4 #be4 ,they also acknowledge1 assert and declare1 that the ,lord ,jesus ,christ is1 by the appointment of ,god the ,father1 set as ,king upon his holy hill of ,zion2 over which1 as his special kingdom1 he is invested with an absolute power and supremacy1 as the sole and only head thereof1 to appoint offices1 officers1 laws and ordinances4 ,and that accordingly1 by virtue of this solemn investiture1 the same ,lord ,jesus ,christ has1 in all ages1 called out of the world1 and maintained therein1 a church unto himself1 which he visibly governs by a complete system of laws1 officers and censures1 instituted in his word1 and has not left the affairs of his church1 in which 7as a ,son over his own house7 he peculiarly presides1 to be regulated and modeled by the carnal policy and invention of men4 ,also1 that1 as ,king in ,zion1 he powerfully and irresistibly1 in a day of efficacious grace1 subdues the perverse hearts and wills of sinners unto his obedience1 persuading and enabling as many as were appointed to obtain salvation through him1 to believe in his name1 in order thereunto4 ,all whom he either preserves from1 or supports under1 the various temptations1 trials and afflictions1 they are liable to in this mortal life2 till at last1 completing a work of grace in their souls1 he advances them to a state of perfection and glory4 ,further1 the ,presbytery declare and maintain1 that1 in subserviency to this his special mediatory kingdom1 the ,lord ,jesus ,christ has a supreme and sovereign power given unto him1 in heaven and in earth1 and over the infernal powers of darkness--angels1 authorities and powers being put in subjection to him2 that he has the management of all the wheels of providence put into his hand1 whereby he restrains1 disappoints1 and at last totally destroys1 all the enemies of his interest and glory2 and by which he orders and overrules all the events that fall out in time1 for the accomplishment of the great and glorious ends of his incarnation1 and lasting good of those that love him3 according to ,psal4 ii1 #f2 ,isa4 ix1 #f1 #g2 ,isa4 xxxiii1 #bb2 ,matth4 xxi1 #e2 ,isa4 lv1 #d1 #e2 ,gen4 xlix1 #aj2 ,heb4 iii1 #f2 ,psal4 cx1 #a1 #b2 ,matth4 xxviii1 #ah2 ,john vii1 #b2 #a ,pet4 iii1 #bb2 ,phil1 ii1 #i-aa2 ,confess1 chap1 viii #c2 ,larg4 ,cat4 quest4 #de2 ,sh4 ,cat4 quest4 #bf4 ,they again declare and assert1 that as the light of nature is absolutely insufficient to give a just discovery1 either of the grievous malady of sin1 or the blessed remedy provided for sinners1 so none1 however diligent they may be to frame their lives according to the dictates of nature's light1 can possibly attain to salvation1 while they remain without any objective revelation of ,jesus ,christ1 as the great propitiation and peace-maker1 who has abolished death1 and brought life and immortality to light1 by the gospel4 ,and further1 that there is no other name1 doctrine or religion1 whereby any can be saved1 but in the name1 doctrine and religion of the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 of which he is the great author and institutor2 in the profession and faith whereof1 he leads his people through this world into the possession of endless felicity and glory in the world to come4 ,,viii4 ,,of ,,the ,,gospel ,,offer4--,they further declare1 that1 as ,god the ,father1 out of his unbounded love1 has1 on the footing of the infinite sufficiency of the death and sacrifice of ,christ1 made a free and unhampered gift and grant of him1 as an all-sufficient ,savior1 unto sinners of mankind lost1 as such1 in the word3 so the ministers and embassadors of ,christ 7according as they are expressly authorized and commanded by him7 are to publish this gospel1 these glad tidings of great joy to all the world1 wherever they may be called or cast1 in the providence of ,god1 and make a full1 free and unhampered offer of ,christ and his whole salvation to sinners1 without distinction1 assuring them of ,god's mercy and grace1 through ,christ1 in whom he proclaims himself well pleased2 of ,christ's omnipotent power and ability to save to the uttermost all that come unto ,god by him2 and that there are no impediments1 bars or hinderances1 ab extra1 between ,jesus ,christ1 as held forth in the offer of the gospel1 and sinners lost1 why they1 even every one of them1 may not receive and appropriate him1 as the ,lord their righteousness4 ,and the above said frank and unhampered gift of ,christ1 and him crucified1 by ,god the ,father1 as a full and all-sufficient ,savior unto lost and ruined sinners1 the ,presbytery view as the great and prime foundation1 both of the ministerial offer1 and of1 faith in the ,lord ,jesus1 for life and salvation3 as is clear from ,rom4 x1 #ad2 #a ,cor4 i1 #ba-be2 ,isa4 lv1 #a2 ,mark xvi1 #ae2 ,john iii1 #af2 ,confess1 chap1 vii1 #c2 ,larg4 ,cat4 ques4 #fg2 ,sh4 ,cat4 ques4 #ca1 c4 ,,ix4 ,,of ,,justification4--,again1 they profess and declare1 that the active and passive obedience1 or the complete mediatory righteousness1 of the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 is the only meritorious cause of a sinner's justification1 pardon of sin1 and acceptance of his person and services with a holy ,god2 and that true and saving faith1 which is also the gift of ,god1 is the alone instrumental cause of the sinner's justification in his sight2 or that evangelical condition1 or internal mean1 in and by which the soul is interested in ,christ1 and the whole of his righteousness and salvation4 ,which righteousness1 received and rested on by faith1 is the only foundation of a sinner's title to eternal life and glory2 as appears evident from ,rom4 iii1 #bb-bi2 ,rom4 v1 #ag-bj2 ,jer4 xxiii1 #f2 ,gal4 ii1 #af2 ,acts x1 #dc2 ,col4 i1 #bg2 ,acts viii1 #cg2 ,rom4 x1 #i2 ,mark v1 #cf2 ,eph4 ii1 #h2 ,confess1 chap4 #aa1 #ad2 ,larg4 ,cat4 ques4 #gj1 #gc2 ,sh4 ,cat4 ques4 #c4 ,they likewise profess and maintain1 that believers1 by the righteousness of ,christ being justified from all things1 from which they could not be justified by the law of ,moses1 are by ,jesus ,christ perfectly delivered from the law1 as a covenant of works1 both as commanding and condemning2 so as that thereby they are neither justified nor condemned1 it being dead to them1 and they to it1 by the body of ,christ1 to whom they are married4 ,however1 notwithstanding of this freedom1 they are still servants unto ,god2 still under the moral law1 as a rule of life in the hand of their glorious ,mediator and new covenant ,head1 directing them how they are to walk1 so as to please ,god2 the obligation whereof1 as such1 remains perpetual and indissoluble2 and that this privilege is peculiar to believers only1 all others being still under the old covenant obligation1 both as to the debt of obedience and punishment2 according to ,rom4 vi1 #ad1 and vii1 #d1 #f2 ,gal4 iv1 #d1 #e1 and ii1 #af2 ,rom4 viii1 #a2 ,gal4 iii1 #aj2 ,confess1 chap1 xix1 #e1 #f2 ,larg4 ,cat4 ques4 #ig2 ,sh4 ,cat4 ques4 #dc1 #dd4 ,x4 ,,of ,,good ,,works4--,again1 they assert and declare1 that as no works are truly and spiritually good1 but those that are performed by a person united to the ,lord ,jesus ,christ by faith1 and under the influence of his ,holy ,spirit2 and consequently1 that none of the actions of the unregenerate1 however in themselves materially agreeable unto the letter of the law1 are either pleasing or acceptable to ,god2 nor can they dispose or prepare their souls for receiving his grace1 though their omission and neglect of these is still more displeasing unto ,god1 and destructive unto themselves4 ,so likewise they declare1 that even the best works of obedience performed by the regenerate1 can neither merit the pardon of any one sin1 nor procure them the smallest measure or ,god's grace or favor1 because of the manifold sins and imperfections they are still attended with1 and because of the infinite distance between ,god and them1 with respect to whom1 when they have done all that they can1 they are but unprofitable servants4 ,neither is their ability to do them at all of themselves1 but wholly from the ,spirit dwelling in them4 ,and further1 that the spring and principle motive of true love to ,god1 and acceptable obedience to him1 is not self-interest or love to our own felicity1 nor yet a slavish fear of punishment2 but the glorious perfections and transcendent excellencies of the ,deity1 manifested in the face of ,jesus ,christ1 who is the brightness of the ,father's glory1 and express image of his person1 are the prime and chief motives both of love1 fear and obedience unto ,god2 all who really love ,god loving him principally for himself4 ,as also1 that all acceptable service to ,god1 performed by believers1 is principally influenced by the authority of a ,god of grace1 stamped upon his word1 springs from faith in ,jesus ,christ1 as an animating and active principle in their souls1 and is ultimately directed to the glory of ,god in ,christ1 as the great end thereof4 ,hence1 therefore1 although ,god has graciously connected his own glory and his people's felicity inseparably together1 that yet no actions1 however good in themselves or beneficial to others1 which arise only from a principle of self-interest1 love to one's own bliss1 or fear of hell1 are evidential of saving grace in the soul1 or any more than what one in a state of nature may perform2 according to ,gen4 iv1 #e2 ,heb4 xi1 #d1 #f2 ,matth4 vi1 #b1 #e1 #af2 ,hag4 ii1 #ad2 ,amos1 v1 #ba1 #bb2 ,tit4 i1 #ae1 and iii1 #e2 ,rom4 iii1 #bj1 and iv1 #b1 #d1 #f2 ,job xxii1 #b1 #c2 ,eph4 i1 #f2 #a ,pet4 ii1 #e2 ,exod4 xxviii1 #ch2 ,confess1 chap4 #af throughout2 ,larg4 ,cat4 ques4 #gc1 #aja2 ,sh4 ,cat4 ques4 #dd4 ,,xi4 ,,of ,,assurance ,,of ,,grace4--,in like manner they declare and assert1 that although there may be much darkness1 and manifold doubts and fears1 seated in the same soul where true and saving faith is3 and although true believers may wait long before they know themselves to be believers1 and be assured that they are really in a state of grace2 and even1 after they have arrived at a subjective assurance of their salvation1 may have it much shaken1 clouded and intermitted2 that yet there is no doubting1 no darkness1 in the saving acts of a true and lively faith3 but in all the appropriating acts of saving faith1 there is an objective assurance1 an assured confidence and trust in ,jesus ,christ1 and the promise of life in which he is revealed to the soul2 according to ,isa4 #a1 #aj2 ,mark ix1 #bd2 #a ,john v1 #ac2 ,psal4 lxxvii1 #a to #aa2 ,psal4 lxxxviii1 throughout2 ,gal4 ii1 #bj2 ,mark xi1 #bd2 ,confess1 chap4 #ah throughout2 ,larg4 ,cat4 ques4 #gb1 #hj1 #ha2 ,short4 ,cat4 question #hf4 ,,xii4 ,,of ,,the ,,perseverance ,,of ,,the ,,saints4--,they further assert and declare1 that whosoever1 of any of the children of men1 in all ages1 have attained salvation1 did believe in1 and receive the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 the promised ,messiah1 and only ,savior from sin1 to whom all the prophets bear witness1 in whom all the promises and lines of salvation do center2 and particularly1 that however much the faith of the disciples and apostles of our ,lord and ,savior ,jesus ,christ in him1 as their only ,redeemer1 might be at any time overclouded1 yet it was never totally subverted2 and that the noble grace of faith in the souls of believers cannot be totally lost2 but that such is the immutability of ,god's decrees1 and his unchangeable love2 such the efficacy of their ,redeemer's merit1 and constant abiding of the spirit of holiness in them2 and such the nature of the new covenant1 that1 notwithstanding of various temptations and afflictions1 the prevailing of remaining corruption in them1 they must all and every one of them1 certainly and infallibly persevere in a state of grace unto the end1 and be at last saved with an everlasting salvation2 as appears from ,heb4 xi1 #ac2 ,john iv1 #db2 ,phil4 i1 #f2 ,john x1 #bh1 #bi2 #a ,pet4 ii1 #i2 ,jer4 xxxiv1 #d2 ,confess1 chap4 #h1 #a1 chap4 #ad1 #b1 and chap4 #ag throughout4 ,,xiii4 ,,of ,,liberty ,,of ,,conscience4--,they further assert and declare1 that the noble faculty of conscience1 ,god's deputy in the soul of man1 over which he alone is absolute ,lord and ,sovereign1 is not subjected unto the authority of man2 neither are any human commands further binding upon the consciences of men1 than they are agreeable unto1 and founded upon the revealed will of ,god1 whether in matters of faith or practice4 ,and although the ,lord ,jesus ,christ has purchased a glorious liberty unto believers from sin1 and all the bitter fruits thereof1 and of access to a throne of grace with boldness2 and has procured unto his church freedom from the yoke of the ceremonial law1 with a more abundant communication of gospel influences3 yet1 inasmuch as conscience is the rule ruled1 not the rule1 ruling1 none can1 without manifest sin1 upon pretense of conscience or ,christian liberty1 cherish any forbidden lust in their souls1 nor are left at freedom to reject any of the divine ordinances instituted in the word1 to change or corrupt their scriptural institution1 by immixing human inventions therewith1 or in the least deviating from the punity thereof4 ,and that therefore1 all who vent or maintain tenets or opinions1 contrary to the established principles of ,christianity1 whether in the matter of doctrine1 divine worship1 or practice in life1 which are contrary to1 and inconsistent with the analogy of faith1 and power of true godliness1 or destructive to that pure peace and good order established by ,christ in his church1 are accountable unto the church2 and upon conviction1 ought to be proceeded against1 by inflicting ecclesiastical censures or civil pains1 in a way agreeable unto the divine determination in the word concerning such offenses4 ,and further1 they declare1 that it is most wicked1 and what manifestly strikes against the sovereign authority of ,god1 for any power on earth to pretend to tolerate1 and1 by sanction of civil law1 to give license to men to publish and propagate with impunity1 whatever errors1 heresies1 and damnable doctrines1 ,satan1 and their own corrupt and blinded understandings1 may prompt them to believe and embrace2 toleration being destructive of all true religion1 and of that liberty wherewith ,christ has made his people free2 and the great end thereof1 which is1 ,that being delivered out of the hands of our enemies1 we may serve the ,lord--in holiness and righteousness1 all the days of our lives4 ,agreeable to ,james iv1 #ab2 ,rom4 xiv1 #d2 ,acts iv1 #ai1 and v1 #bi2 #a ,cor4 vii1 #bc2 ,matth4 xxiii1 #i2 #b ,john #aj1 #aa2 #b ,cor4 i1 #bd2 ,matth4 xv1 #i2 ,col4 ii1 #bj1 #bb1 #bc2 ,gal4 ii1 #d1 #e1 and v1 #a1 #ac2 ,isa4 viii1 #bj2 ,acts xvii1 #aa2 ,hosea v1 #aa2 #a ,cor4 v1 #a1e1 #aa1 #ac2 ,tit4 i4 #aj1 #aa1 #ac1 and iii1 #bj2 ,matth4 xviii1 #ae-ag2 ,deut4 xiii1 #f-ab2 ,ezek4 vii1 #bc1 #be1 #bf2 ,zech4 xiii1 #b1 #c2 ,rev4 ii1 #b1 #ad1 #ae1 #bj2 ,confess1 chap4 #bj2 ,larg4 ,cat4 quest4 #ajj1 #ajc2 ,sh4 ,cat4 quest4 #di1 #ej4 ,,xiv4 ,,of ,,testimony-,,bearing4--,again1 they declare and assert1 that all true believers1 members of the church invisible1 are by the indissoluble bond of the ,spirit1 and true faith in ,christ1 their ,head1 savingly united unto1 and have communion with him in grace and in glory1 in this life and the life to come4 ,in all their afflictions he is afflicted1 and shares with them in their sufferings and trials1 is with them in and through death1 exalteth them at last over all their enemies1 receiving them into glory and blessedness with himself1 that they may behold and share in his glory with him through eternity3 and that all of them being knit and joined together in holy love and affection1 do participate mutually of each others gifts and graces2 and are indispensably bound to exercise themselves in the practice of all commanded duties1 for preserving the love of ,god1 and life of grace1 in their own1 and one another's souls4 ,and further1 they declare that the visible church1 and the members thereof1 are externally in covenant with ,christ their ,head1 have one and the same ,lord1 profess the same faith in doctrine and worship1 receive the same seals of ,god's covenant1 baptism1 and the ,lord's ,supper3 and are thereby bound to hold fast the ,head1 to be subject to his authority1 keep the faith they have received1 and maintain an holy communion and fellowship in the worship of ,god2 closely abiding by the standard of ,christ1 their captain and leader1 and lifting up the banner of divine truth1 in opposition unto1 and holy contempt of all their enemies of every kind4 ,and further1 they affirm1 that as the visible church in general1 is bound to be faithful to ,christ1 their ,head and ,lord1 and to preserve inviolate1 the whole of that sacred depositum of truth wherewith she is intrusted by him1 not quitting with1 nor willfully apostatizing from the same1 in profession or practise3 so no particular subject of this spiritual kingdom of ,christ can recede from any part of divine truth1 which they have received1 and whereof they have made profession1 without lese-majesty unto the ,son of ,god1 and violation of their obligations they have come under1 at receiving the seals of the covenant1 with whatever other lawful vows they have made unto the ,most ,high2 according to #a ,john i1 #b1 #c2 ,eph4 iii1 #af-ai2 ,john i1 #af2 ,heb4 x1 #bd1 #be2 ,acts ii1 #db1 #df2 ,eph4 iv1 #d-f2 ,phil4 iii1 #af2 ,rev4 ii1 #be1 and iii1 #c2 ,confess1 chap4 #b1 #f2 ,larg4 ,cat4 quest4 #fc2 ,short4 ,cat4 quest4 #ej4 ,,xv4 ,,of ,,church ,,government4--,they likewise affirm and declare1 that the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 our exalted ,immanuel1 the sole and supreme ,head1 ,lawgiver and ,king of his church1 which is his spiritual and absolutely free and independent kingdom1 has herein warranted1 instituted and appointed certain office-bearers 7who derive their mission and authority from him alone7 to regulate1 administer1 judge and determine in all the affairs of his house1 to whom alone the keys of the kingdom of heaven are by him committed4 ,particularly1 they are intrusted with the key of doctrine1 to discover the mind of ,god1 and preach ,christ crucified unto sinners2 the key of government for preserving that beauty of order1 purity and power in the house of ,god1 which he has enjoined should take place therein2 the key of discipline1 to inflict ecclesiastical censures upon such as turn aside after their crooked ways1 or continue obstinate in their offenses2 the key of ordination and mediate mission1 in ordinary circumstances of the church1 solemnly to set apart and send forth church officers unto that sacred function and official trust in the house of ,god1 on the regular trial of the suitableness of their gifts and qualifications for that spiritual service and ministration2 according to #a ,cor4 xii1 #bh2 ,eph4 iv1 #aa2 ,matth4 xviii1 #ai2 ,john xx1 #bc2 ,matth4 xviii1 #ah2 ,acts xv1 throughout1 and xvi1 #d2 ,matth4 xxviii1 #ai1 #bj2 ,mark xvi1 #ae2 ,acts vi1 #f2 #a ,tim4 iv1 #ad1 and iii1 #aj2 ,confess1 chap #cj1 #b1 #c and #ca2 #c4 ,form of church government1 books of discipline1 and the several laudable acts and constitutions of this church2 particularly1 ,act of ,assem4 at ,edinburgh1 ,august #dth1 #afdi1 ,sess4 #d1 entitled1 ,directory for electing of ministers4 ,they likewise assert and maintain1 that the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 the church's glorious ,head1 hath appointed a certain form of government therein1 distinct from civil government1 and not at all subordinate to civil rulers4 ,and that the only ecclesiastical government warranted by ,christ is his word1 and to continue in his church unalterable1 is ,presbyterial church government1 exclusive of all superior dignity above a teaching presbyter1 and consisting in her judicative capacity of kirk-sessions1 in subordination to presbyteries2 of presbyteries1 in subordination to provincial synods2 of provincial synods1 in subordination to national2 and national to ecumenical assemblies1 or general councils4 ,and further1 they assert1 that the office-bearers of the ,lord's house1 are1 according to the command1 and in the name and authority of the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 the only ,lawgiver and ,king of his church1 and by virtue of the church's intrinsic power derived from ,christ1 to assemble1 constitute and adjourn these several courts of his house1 nominate the fixed or occasional times of their subsequent meetings1 as the church's condition or exigencies require2 although they grant that the ,christian magistrate may1 in extraordinary cases1 or otherwise1 call together a synod of ministers1 and ether fit persons1 for consultation and advice in religious matters3 but in which they have no power to judge or determine in matters of faith2 but only discretively to examine1 whether the synod's determinations and decisions be consonant and agreeable to scripture1 and accordingly to acquiesce therein2 ,isa4 ix1 #f1 #g2 ,ezek4 xliii1 #aj1 #aa2 ,acts xv1 #b1 #d1 #f2 #a ,tim4 v1 #ag2 ,heb4 xiii1 #ag2 #b ,chron4 xix1 #h-aa2 ,acts xvii1 #aa2 ,confess1 chap4 #cj1 #a and chap4 #ca1 #a1 #b1 and conform to act of assembly1 anno #afdg2 #b1c2 #b;d book of discipline1 and propositions for church government4 ,they likewise assert and maintain1 that the office-bearers in the church of ,christ1 according to their different places and stations therein1 must give evidence of their being possessed in some suitable measure of the qualifications which ,god in his word requires to be in any that are to be placed in such stations or offices1 particularly that of devotedness to the cause and honor of ,christ4 ,and they further assert1 that ministers of the gospel1 and other church officers1 must enter into the exercise of their office1 at the door of ,christ's appointment1 by the call and choice of the ,christian people1 who are capable with judgment to give their consent2 #a ,tim4 iii1 from verse #b to #ab2 ,tit4 i1 #e1 #f1 #g2 ,acts vi1 #b to #f2 ,chap1 xiv1 #bc2 ,john x1 #d1 #e1 and agreeable to the laudable acts and ordinances of this church and state1 in favor of reformation principles1 books of discipline1 c4 ,,xvi4 ,,of ,,civil ,,government4--,in like manner they assert and maintain1 that ,god ,almighty1 the ,sovereign ,lord of all things1 and special protector and preserver of his professed subjects in this lower world1 hath for his own glory and the public good1 authorized and instituted in his word the office and ordinance of civil government and governors1 for the preservation of external peace and concord1 administration of justice1 defense and encouragement of such as are1 and do good1 and punishment of evil doers1 who transgress either table of the law4 ,for all which ends1 subordinate unto that of his own glory1 ,god1 the alone supreme fountain of all power1 has instituted and appointed this ordinance4 ,and further they maintain1 that a due measure of those qualifications which ,god1 the great lawgiver requires in his word1 together with what other stipulations according to the same unerring rule1 a ,christian people1 who are blessed with the light of divine revelation1 have made the fundamental conditions of civil government among them1 are essentially necessary to the constitution and investiture of lawful authority over such a people4 ,no other but such a constitution and investiture1 can either be approven of by ,god1 or answer the ends1 ultimate or subordinate1 of this ordinance1 unto the honor of the great institutor1 as appears from ,prov4 viii1 #ae1 #af2 ,psa4 cxlvii1 #ai1 #bj1 and cxlix1 ,g1 #g1 #h1 #i2 ,isa4 xlix1 #bc2 ,rom4 xiii1 #a1 #b1 #c1 #d2 ,deut4 xvii1 #ad1 #ae2 #b ,sam4 xxiii1 #b1 #c1 #d2 ,exod4 xviii1 #ba4 ,confess1 chap4 #bc1 #a4 ,seasonable warning by the general assembly1 ,july #bg1 #afdi4 ,act #ae1 ,sess4 #b1 ,parl4 #a1 #afdj4 ,they further assert and maintain1 that the constituting of the relation betwixt rulers and ruled1 is voluntary and mutual2 and that the lawful constitution of civil magistrates1 is1 by the mutual election of the people 7in whom is the radical right1 or intermediate voice of ,god1 of choosing and appointing such as are to sway the scepter of government over them7 and consent of those who are elected and chosen for the exercise of that office1 with certain stipulations according to scripture and right reason1 obliging each other unto the duty of their different stations and relations4 ,and further they affirm that when magistrates are so constituted1 ,christians are bound by the law of ,god to pray for the divine blessing upon their persons and government1 reverence and highly esteem them1 yield a conscientious subjection and obedience to their lawful commands1 defend and support them in the due exercise of their power2 which power magistrates are especially to exert for the outward defense of the church of ,god1 against all her external enemies1 restraining or otherwise punishing1 as the case may require1 all open blasphemers1 idolaters1 false-worshipers1 heretics1 with all avowed contemners of the worship and discipline of the house of ,god2 and by his civil sanction to corroborate all the laws and ordinances of ,christ's house1 providing and enjoining that every thing in the house of the ,god of heaven1 be done according to the law of the ,god of heaven2 ,deut4 xvii1 #ad2 #b ,kings xi1 #ag2 #a ,sam4 xi1 #ae2 #a ,tim4 ii1 #a1b2 #a ,peter ii1 #ag2 ,rom xiii1 #b to #h2 #b ,kings xviii1 #d1 and xxiii1 #a to #bf2 #b ,chron4 xxix1 and xxx1 chapters throughout2 ,ezra vii1 #bc4 ,confess4 chap4 #bc1 #c1 coronation oath of ,scotland1 sworn and subscribed by ,charles ,,ii4 at ,scone1 ,january #ast1 #afea1 and oath of fidelity by the people4 ,,xvii4 ,,of ,,corruptions ,,in ,,the ,,two ,,preceding ,,ordinances4--,but1 with respect to these two great ordinances of divine institution1 the magistracy and ministry1 with the qualifications of the persons and duty of the people1 as before asserted1 the ,presbytery reject1 like as they did1 and hereby do reject and condemn the following contrary errors1 tenets and opinions1 whether of older or later date1 vented either by open enemies or professed friends to the reformation cause4 ,and1 #a4 ,they reject and condemn that loose latitudinarian tenet and opinion of opening the door of communion with the church in her judicative capacity1 or sealing ordinances1 unto the grossly ignorant1 loose1 careless1 profane and scandalous3 and to the anti-christian deist1 blasphemous heretic1 or any who maintain doctrines1 principles and opinions contrary to1 and eversive of the cardinal and fundamental doctrines of ,christianity1 or such principles and practices as oppose1 obscure or darken the church's beauty and purity1 and spoil her of her power1 and particularly that of the church of ,scotland1 in her attainments in reformation2 this being evidently destructive and ruinous to truth and holiness1 the only foundation and basis of external union and concord in the church1 and consequently of all durable1 harmonious and comfortable communion among the ministers and members of ,christ's mystical body3 ,see ,eph4 v1 #aa2 ,isa4 viii1 #bj2 ,amos iii1 #c2 #a ,cor4 vi1 #aj2 ,heb4 xii1 #ad2 ,rev4 xxii1 #ad1 #ae2 #b ,cor4 vi1 #ag1 #ah2 and conform to the acts and practice of this church1 in her best and purest times1 in excluding from her communion1 and refusing to unite with any chargeable as above4 ,again1 they hereby reject that false and ungodly principle and opinion1 ,that a ,god of infinite wisdom has left his professing people destitute of any declaration of his will 7which they are absolutely bound to regard7 concerning both the institution1 administration and qualifications of such persons as should administer these two distinct ordinances1 government1 civil and ecclesiastical2 or that these two different species of government have not their foundation and institution1 as the ordinances of ,god1 in his revealed will2 but that either 7with the corrupt revolution church7 he hath left the government of his house a matter of indifference1 and the pattern thereof to be moulded by the discretion of the wise men of this world1 and according to the corrupt will and fluctuating inclination of the people2 or1 with their public resolution-brethren1 the ,seceders1 exchanging the clear scriptural and covenanted basis of civil government1 with the obscure foundation of the law and light of nature1 or the more dissolute basis of mere election and acknowledgment of whomsoever the primores regni1 though never so wicked and licentious1 choose and set up as magistrates4 ,which notion contains an injurious and impious impeachment of divine revelation1 as a rule imperfect and insufficient to guide ,christians into the knowledge of the will of ,god1 and their duty1 as the peculiar and professed subjects of the ,king of kings1 and supreme lawgiver1 concerning all his ordinances2 and is contrary to #b ,tim4 iii1 #af2 ,rom1 ii1 #ad2 ,ezek4 xliii1 #aa2 and xliv1 #e2 ,lev4 xviii1 #b1 #c1 #d1 #e2 ,matt1 xxviii1 #bj4 ,confess1 chap4 #bc1 #c4 ,they in like manner reject and condemn the ecclesiastical headship of the church1 blasphemously arrogated by that man of sin1 and son of perdition the ,pope of ,rome2 with all that superiority of dignity and office in the house of ,god1 claimed by anti-christian ,prelates1 together with the whole of their hierarchical order1 and the civil places and power of churchmen1 by both usurped2 which is a most wicked attempt to overturn ,god the ,father's deed1 constituting his ,son ,christ1 sole ,king and ,head of his church1 an exauctorating of ,jesus ,christ from his throne1 and headship in his church1 an elevation of his ministers1 contrary to his will1 and the nature and ends of their office2 and an anti-scriptural and confused blending together of different and distinct ordinances4 ,psa4 ii1 #f2 ,isa4 ix1 #f1 and xxii1 #bd2 ,col4 i1 #ah2 ,mark x1 #db1 #dc2 ,luke xxii1 #be1 #bf2 ,i ,pet4 v1 #c2 #b ,chron4 xix1 #ab2 #a ,cor4 vii1 #b4 ,confess4 chap4 #be1 #f1 and contrary to our solemn covenants1 and many acts and ordinances of both church and state1 in times of reformation4 ,they likewise reject and condemn that gross ,erastian principle1 ,that the civil magistrate is supreme head over all persons1 and in all causes1 ecclesiastical as well as civil1 whether in more ancient and later times of tyranny and persecution1 openly and blasphemously usurped1 or at and since the ,revolution1 more craftily yet too manifestly claimed2 as appears from the #cgth article of the church of ,england1 and king's declaration prefixed to the said articles3 and is further evident from the many encroachments made upon the royal dignity and headship of ,christ1 by the usurpers of his throne1 practically vesting themselves with power and authority to convene and adjourn at their pleasure1 and give laws and ordinances to the church1 which is a daring attack on the prerogative1 sovereignty1 wisdom and power of her absolute ,king and ,lord1 on whom1 as a nail fastened in a sure place1 his ,father has hung all the glory of his house1 and vested him with the sole supremacy over the same1 being filled abundantly with the spirit of wisdom and understanding1 with the spirit of counsel and of might1 to direct and preside in the management of all her concerns1 and to preserve from and overcome all her enemies2 ,isa4 xxii1 #bd1 and xi1 #b1 #c1 and ix1 #f2 ,col4 i1 #ah2 ,eph4 i1 #bb2 #b ,chr4 xxvi1 #ah2 ,heb4 v1 #d2 ,confess4 chap4 #be1 #f4 ,they also reject and condemn that ,erastian tenet and opinion1 that the whole or any part of the power1 mission1 qualifications1 or administration of ecclesiastical officers1 or ministers of the church of ,christ1 depends upon the authority and dictation of the civil magistrate1 because it is manifestly destructive of the church's power and authority1 under ,christ her ,head1 and derived from him1 and likewise of the ministerial freedom and faithfulness of ,christ's embassadors3 and particularly they reject and condemn1 as gross ,erastianism 7whether practiced before or since the ,revolution1 and especially since the incorporating union with ,england on terms diametrically opposite to our covenant union71 the civil magistrate's limiting the mission of office-bearers in the church1 according to his will2 prescribing certain qualifications1 and restricting to certain limitations2 such as the test1 indulgences1 allegiance1 assurance1 and abjuration oaths1 act restoring patronages1 and the act anent ,porteous1 together with the threatened deprivation of office and benefice1 upon non-compliance2 #a ,cor4 xii1 #bh2 ,matt1 xviii1 #ag1 #ah2 ,john xx1 #bc4 ,they further reject and condemn that ,erastian opinion1 that the external government of ,christ's house is left unto the precarious determination of sinful men1 or hath either its immediate or mediate dependence upon the will and pleasure of the civil magistrate1 according to the import of the claim of right1 the anti-scriptural basis of the revolution settlement4 ,this being evidently an impious reflection on the perfect wisdom of the church's ,head1 subversive of the beauty of his house1 and fertile of disorder therein1 laying the kingdom of ,christ obnoxious to spiritual tyranny and oppression1 when strangers1 enemies1 or such as have no call or warrant to build the house of the ,lord1 put to their hand to model the form of her government as best suits their perverse inclinations and secular views1 in express contradiction to the will and law of the ,god of heaven1 ,exod xxv1 #dj1 and xxvi1 #cj2 ,ezek4 xliii1 #aa2 #a ,chron4 xv1 #ab1 #ac2 ,neh4 ii1 #bj1 with many other texts above cited4 ,again they reject and condemn that latitudinarian tenet1 ,that the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 the alone ,head of the church1 hath left his house void of any particular form of government1 of divine institution exclusive of all other1 under the ,new ,testament dispensation3 which1 is a manifest reflection upon his fidelity to him who appointed him1 and most absurd to suppose of him who is true and faithful1 as a ,son over his own house1 and contrary to ,isa4 ix1 #f1 #g2 #a ,tim4 v1 #ag2 ,heb4 iii1 #b1 #c1 #e2 #a ,cor4 xii1 #bh2 ,rom4 xii #f1 #g1 #h2 ,acts xx1 #ag1 #bh2 ,matt1 xxviii1 #bj4 ,confess4 chap4 #cj1 #a1 and to the propositions for church government4 ,they further reject and condemn that sectarian principle and tenet1 whether in former or latter times maintained1 that a kirk session1 or particular congregational eldership1 is vested with equal ecclesiastical power and authority1 with any superior judicatory1 and is neither subordinate nor accountable to them 7in the ,lord7 in their determinations4 ,they likewise reject as sectarian1 ,that the community of the faithful or professing ,christians1 in a private station hath any scriptural warrant for public teaching1 or judicative determination in the church2 both which opinions are not only expressly contrary to scripture1 ,acts xv1 throughout1 and xvi1 #d2 ,i ,cor4 v1 #d2 #a ,tim3 v1 #ag2 ,heb4 v1 #d1 and xiii1 #ag1 c1 but also have been found hitherto most hurtful and dangerous to the church of ,god1 depriving her ministers and members of just and necessary recourse to superior judgment and decision in matters difficult1 discrediting and prostituting the sacred office of the ministry1 and tending to overthrow a standing ministry in the church of ,christ1 and subvert that comely and beautiful order he hath prescribed therein4 ,in like manner they reject and condemn that gross invasion and encroachment upon the church's liberties1 by the intrusion of popish patronages1 whether imposed as a law by civil1 or executed by ecclesiastical powers4 ,of the latter of these1 the ministers and judicatories of the now corrupt1 harlot ,church of ,scotland1 cannot but be more egregiously guilty4 ,the nature of their sacred function and trust obliges them to preserve inviolate the church's freedom and liberties3 but in place of this1 their hands are chief in the trespass1 in an authoritative and active enforcement of this wicked act--an act evidently destructive of the very nature and essence of that mutual relation between pastor and people1 and which has the native and necessary tendency to schism in the church1 spiritual leanness1 and starving of the flock1 by thrusting in idle1 idol shepherds upon them1 such as serve not our ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 but their own bellies2 feed themselves1 but not the flock2 and seek not them1 but theirs1 contrary to ,john x1 #b1 #i2 ,heb4 v1 #d2 #a ,tim4 iii1 #c2 #a ,cor4 xii1 #ad1 with many more2 and to acts of both church and state1 in times of reformation in these covenanted lands4 ,but1 on the other hand1 that the ,presbytery1 when thus condescending on particulars1 pass not over in sinful silence1 what stands opposite to the word of ,god and their declared principles1 as above concerning civil authority1 the administrators thereof1 and subjection of the people thereto3 they reject1 likeas they hereby reject and condemn that anti-scriptural principle and opinion1 that the divine scriptural ordinance of magistracy has not its foundation in the moral preceptive law of ,god 7wherein alone his will is revealed and declared unto his people1 concerning the nature1 use1 and ends of all his ordinances71 but in the subjective light of nature 7even as corrupted71 so confused and dark in its discoveries1 so gross and selfish in its principles1 motives1 and ends1 that neither the true nature of this1 nor any other of the ordinances of ,jehovah1 as revealed in his word1 can hereby be known1 or the true use and ends thereof sufficiently discovered or obtained4 ,they likewise testify against1 and reject that equally absurd opinion1 as a stream flowing from the foresaid corrupt fountain1 that the office1 authority1 and constitution of lawful magistrates1 does not solely belong to professing ,christians1 in a ,christian reformed land1 but that the election and choice of any one whosoever1 made by the civil body 7whether ,pagan1 ,papist1 ,atheist1 ,deist1 or other enemy to ,god1 to man1 and to true religion71 makes up the whole of what is essential to the constitution of a lawful magistrate according to ,god's ordinance4 ,a tenet contrary to the light and dictates both of reason and scripture4 ,and they hereby also disclaim that corrupt notion1 that all providential magistrates1 who are1 and while they are acknowledged by any civil society especially in an apostate backsliding land and people from the scriptural standard 7in respect of the origin of their office71 are also preceptive2 and that the office and authority of all so constituted and acknowledged1 in itself considered1 does equally arise from1 and agree unto the preceptive will of ,god1 contrary to scriptural precepts1 ,deut4 xvii1 #ah2 what falls under scriptural reproof1 ,hos4 viii1 #d2 and what greatly depreciates the valiant contendings of our honored ancestors for civil reformation1 and tends to invalidate their deeds of constitution thereanent4 ,again the ,presbytery testifies against1 and condemns that principle1 that the ,christian people of ,god ought to give explicit acknowledgment of1 implicit subjection and obedience to1 whatever civil authority 7though most wicked and unlawful7 the ,lord in his holy providence1 may1 for the trial and punishment of his church1 permit a backsliding people to constitute and set up1 without regard to the precept of his word4 ,and they hereby reject whatever in opposition to the covenanted principles of the ,church of ,scotland1 does justly1 and in its own nature imply a voluntary and real acknowledgment of the lawfulness of the title and authority of an anti-scriptural1 anti-covenanted1 and ,erastian government1 constituted upon the ruins of our scriptural covenanted reformation4 ,particularly1 they testify against praying for success and prosperity to such1 in their stated opposition to the ,lord and his ,anointed1 or in any form implying a homologation of their title as lawful1 swearing oaths of fidelity and allegiance to such1 accepting any office from such1 and executing these in their name and authority under them1 military associations with such1 by a voluntary enlisting under their banner1 and fighting for their support and establishment4 ,and that in regard these are actions1 as they express a proper and explicit owning of the lawfulness of that authority1 which they immediately respect1 so they are such as cannot be obtained without the actual consent of the party performing1 and must therefore imply a deliberate approbation of foresaid iniquitous authority4 ,further1 they testify against a direct and active1 free and voluntary paying of tribute and other dues1 unto such1 and that for conscience sake1 as unto the ordinance of ,god1 according to his precept2 and particularly1 when these dues are required as a tessera of loyalty to such2 or when required1 as an evidence of a person's active contributing to the accomplishment of some wicked action1 expressly declared to be the immediate end of the imposition4 ,thus the case was in the time of persecution1 when the declared end of the additional cess1 was the immediate suppression of the pure preaching of the gospel in the fields4 ,as also1 not only against professed witnesses for reformation principles1 their prosecuting of their witnessing brethren at law before the courts of anti-scriptural1 unqualified judges2 but generally1 against all law processes1 in a way of direct counteracting any part of reformation attainments1 or express homologating the authority of an unlawful judge4 ,and1 in fine1 against all voluntary subjection1 for conscience sake1 unto such powers as are not the ordinance of ,god1 according to his revealed preceptive will1 as contrary to scripture2 #b ,sam4 ii1 #aj2 #b ,kings xi1 #d1 #ag2 #b ,chron4 xix1 #b2 ,isa4 viii1 #ab and lxv1 #aa2 ,rom4 xiii1 #a to #h2 #a ,cor4 vi1 #a to #h1 contrary to the acts of this church approving1 and ordinances of the state1 establishing the civil authority upon its scriptural foundation1 and thereby discovering the proper object of a ,christian people's voluntary and conscientious subjection2 and particularly1 to the act of classes4 ,while in the meantime1 it must be acknowledged1 that the state and condition of ,presbyterian ,covenanters in these lands1 continuing1 as a community1 to witness and contend for reformation of both church and state1 that obtained1 and was established1 between #afch and #afej1 cannot be regarded as that of a free people enjoying their ancient privileges and liberties1 but as that of an oppressed people1 brought under the power of a conqueror1 and no better than captives in their own land4 ,as this was evidently the state of the suffering remnant under the persecuting period1 when1 by the force of the sword1 they were robbed of their former liberties1 and reduced to the most deplorable condition4 ,so1 however the ,revolution did alter some circumstances in the condition of ,covenanters2 yet1 in regard it was established upon1 and did homologate the overthrow of the reformation1 to which that people do still adhere1 it could make no substantial change in their condition1 from what it formerly was4 ,and moreover1 as it is necessarily requisite to the constituting of the relation between magistrate and people1 that there be a mutual and voluntary consent2 and as the community of presbyterian ,covenanters did never1 at or since the ,revolution1 give such consent2 but1 on the contrary1 have1 in the most public manner1 protested against the constitution and installment of rulers in agreeableness thereto1 as being contrary to the word of ,god1 covenanted constitution1 and fundamental laws of the nations2 as is evident from their printed testimonies and declarations4 ,it follows1 that their state is that of an oppressed people1 in passive subjection to a conquering power1 whose duty is1 to wait with patience upon ,israel's ,god for his return to revive his work1 and recall the bondage of his ,zion4 ,and while they are to take care to do nothing that justly implies their consent to the continued opposition made unto the covenanted reformation1 yet they ought to observe a proper difference between such actions and things as are necessary1 and in themselves just and lawful1 by a moral obligation1 and those that are not so4 ,as also1 between that which cannot be had1 nor the value or equivalent of it1 unless the person actually give it2 and that which may be obtained1 whether he actually contribute to it or not4#g ,most applicable to this our present condition1 are the words of the ,levites1 expressing the distressed state of ,israel1 which they had brought themselves into by their sins1 as recorded by ,neh4 ix1 #cf1 #cg3 ,behold we are servants this day2 and for the land thou gavest unto our fathers1 to eat the fruit thereof1 and the good thereof1 behold we are servants in it3 and it yieldeth much increase unto the kings which thou hast set over us1 because of our sins2 also they have dominion over our bodies1 and over our cattle1 at their pleasure1 and we are in great distress4 ,likewise the ,presbytery testify against all ministerial or church communion with such1 who1 though they may occupy the place of office-bearers in the church of ,christ1 yet are destitute of those qualifications indispensably required by the church's ,head1 or enter not into their office by the door he has appointed in his word1 own another head than ,christ1 or apostatize and fall from the truth and cause of ,christ1 formerly espoused and sworn to by them in a church capacity2 against all active owning and countenancing of such1 by attending upon any of their corrupt official ministrations1 or receiving any ordinances from such1 to whom the ,lord has denied his blessing4 ,against all voluntary contracting with prelates1 curates1 or such officers of human invention in the church1 for paying tithes or other dues unto them1 as unto lawful1 scriptural parish ministers4 ,for besides that there is nothing due unto them1 their office having no divine authority2 so there being under the ,new ,testament a change of the priesthood1 there is also a change of the law1 respecting tithes2 according to #b ,cor4 vi1 #ag2 ,rev4 ii1 #bj1 c4 ,by all which it appears1 from what is above asserted and declared concerning these two divine distinct ordinances1 the ministry and magistracy1 that the principles maintained thereanent by the ,presbytery1 are nothing else than an endeavor1 as a judicatory of the ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 constituted in his name1 to hold fast the church of ,scotland's testimony1 agreeable to the scriptures of truth1 for confession and covenants1 fundamental acts and constitutions both of church and state and this1 according to the command of the church's sole ,king and ,head2 ,rev4 ii1 #be1 and iii1 #aa4 ,and what is testified against1 is1 in the nature of it1 an homologation of the church's faithful opposition to backsliders1 in their course of defection1 from the national1 attainments in religion and reformation1 resisting even unto blood1 striving against sin4 ,,xviii4 ,,of ,,oaths ,,and ,,vows4--,the ,presbytery further assert and declare1 that oaths and vows are a part of religious worship1 warranted in the word of ,god1 and under the ,new ,testament dispensation1 and may be lawfully taken and entered into by the ,lord's people4 ,that such oaths and vows only are warrantable1 as are lawful both for the matter and the manner of them2 and those that are so1 when once engaged in1 must not be violated on any consideration1 and that1 because of the authority of the awful name of ,god interposed in them4 ,and further1 they declare1 that the right of administering oaths is competent only to those vested with such authority as is agreeable to the word of truth4 ,as also1 that it is the incumbent duty of ,christians1 by solemn oath to bind themselves to maintain and defend the persons of righteous rulers1 in the lawful exercise of their authority2 and to such only1 it is lawful to swear oaths of allegiance and fidelity4 ,and hereby1 they disapprove the principle of refusing allegiance to lawful authority4 ,at the same time1 the ,presbytery testify against1 as above1 all the oaths of allegiance in being1 to an ,erastian ,prelatical government4 ,and further1 they reject and detest that sinful1 idolatrous and superstitious form of swearing1 in laying the hand upon1 and kissing the gospels1 practiced by the ,prelatical churches of ,england and ,ireland1 and even introduced into ,scotland1 as a gross profanation of that holy ordinance1 and contrary to the scripture examples thereof4 ,hereby they also testify against all sinful swearing1 whereby the name of ,god1 his titles1 perfections1 or graces of his ,holy ,spirit1 are profaned in ordinary discourse4 ,as also1 the unnecessary oaths of customhouse1 trade1 c41 as a reiterated and fearful profanation of the name of ,god4 ,and moreover1 they testify against1 and condemn that ungodly and superstitious oath1 practiced by that unhallowed club1 called ,free ,masons3 according to ,deut4 x1 #bj2 ,exod4 xx1 #g2 ,neh4 xiii1 #be2 ,ezra x1 #e2 ,deut4 vi1 #ac2 ,matth4 iv1 #ce1 #cf2 ,ezek4 xvii1 #af1 #ag1 #ah1 #ai2 ,rev4 x1 #e1 #f2 ,jer4 iv1 #b4 and v1 #b2 ,confess4 chap4 #bb4 ,again1 they testify and declare1 that the work of solemn covenanting with a ,god in ,christ1 is a duty warranted in the scriptures of the ,old and ,new ,testament1 and by the examples of the godly1 agreeable thereto2 and that not only to individuals in particular1 but to churches and nations in general4 ,which covenants once entered into1 and being for the matter of them lawful1 are most sacred1 and therefore inviolably binding2 and what cannot be broken or transgressed1 without manifest guilt1 and incurring the dreadful resentment of a holy and jealous ,god1 who has severely threatened to punish covenant-breakers4 ,and hence they assert1 that the ,national ,covenant of ,scotland1 and the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant entered into by the three nations1 for reformation and defense of religion1 and for the maintainance and preservation of the truths and ordinances of ,god in purity1 and sworn by our honored ancestors1 not only for themselves1 but including also their posterity1 are of divine authority1 as having their foundation upon the word of ,god2 therefore moral1 and so perpetually binding upon the nations1 and every individual of them1 to the latest posterity4 ,wherefore1 the ,presbytery testify against the principle of refusing the lawfulness of national covenanting1 particularly1 under the ,new ,testament dispensation1 and all principles and practices that strike against the moral obligation of these covenants2 see ,deut4 vi1 #ac1 ,isa4 ix1 #ah1 and xliv1 #e2 ,jer4 #a1 #e2 ,deut4 xxix1 #ab to #af1 #bd1 #be2 ,lev4 xxvi1 #be1 #bf2 ,josh1 ix1 #ad1 #ae1 #ah1 #ai2 #b ,sam4 xxi1 #a2 ,ezek4 xvi1 #ei1 and xvii1 #ae1 #af1 #ah1 #ai2 ,hos4 x1 #d2 ,gal4 iii1 #ae2 #b ,cor4 viii1 #e4 ,see also acts and ordinances both of church and state in times of reformation1 respecting the taking1 and binding obligation1 of the covenants4 ,again1 the ,presbytery hereby testify and declare their approbation of1 and adherence unto1 all the different steps of reformation1 that ever1 in any period1 were attained unto in this church and land3 particularly1 besides what has been mentioned above1 they declare their adherence to the ,westminster ,confession of ,faith1 as it was approven by act of the ,general ,assembly of the ,church of ,scotland1 anno #afdg3 ,catechisms1 larger and shorter2 ,form of church government1 ,directory for worship1 and ,books of ,discipline1 as agreeable to1 and extracted from the sacred oracles4 ,and with respect to the fourth article of the #bc;d chapter of our ,confession1 the ,presbytery hereby declare1 that they reject that corrupt sense and gloss which has been imposed upon it1 whether by open enemies1 or false friends to our covenanted reformation in former or latter times1 viz41 ,that a reformed ,christian people1 having generally received1 and publicly professing the true religion2 and more especially1 having expressly and solemnly bound themselves by public national vows to the ,most ,high1 for the preservation of it1 may warrantably set over them an infidel1 or one of a religion differing from the true religion1 and thereupon acknowledge and submit themselves unto him1 as their lawful civil ruler for conscience sake4 ,and moreover1 they declare that they understand said articles1 as principally relating to the condition of a people emerging out of the darkness and superstition of ,paganism or ,popery1 c41 before that religion has obtained the sanction of civil authority2 when1 although the major part or bulk of a people should embrace the true religion1 yet that does not dissolve or loose the relation subsisting between them and their civil rulers1 prior to their conversion1 agreeable to1 and founded upon the just and reasonable laws of the realm4 ,in this case only1 it is granted1 that an infidel1 or one of a different religion1 may have authority just and legal over a people partly converted to the knowledge and gospel of ,christ4 ,thus it was with the primitive ,christians1 and thus it was particularly with our ancestors in ,scotland1 at the beginning of the reformation2 and this perfectly well agrees to the apostolic precept and determination in a case similar to the above2 #a ,cor4 vii1 #ab1 #ac and #ci1 and #b ,cor4 vi1 #ad4 ,as also1 they further declare their approbation of1 and adherence to all the faithful testimonies1 declarations and protestations1 emitted by the witnesses for the work of reformation1 whether before or under the late times of tyranny and persecution1 in prisons1 scaffolds1 or in the fields1 by land or sea2 or by such1 as since that time have succeeded4 them in the self same testimony1 as they are founded upon1 and agreeable to the word of truth1 and as a just and proper vindication of foresaid covenanted cause4 ,and particularly with the above proviso and limitation1 they declare their adherence to the ,rutherglen1 ,sanquhar and ,lanerk declarations1 annis #afgi1 #afhj1 #afhb2 as also to the declarations published at ,sanquhar1 #afhc1 #afhd1 #afib1 and #afie1 #agjc1 #agjg2 to the informatory vindication1 and cloud of witnesses2 to the covenants national and solemn league1 sworn at ,auchensaugh1 near ,douglas1 in the year #agab1 at ,crawfurd-john #agde2 with the additional acknowledgments of sins1 and engagements to duties at these times2 to the declarations published at ,sanquhar1 #agah1 and at ,montherrick1 #agdj1 #agda4 ,and in like manner1 they testify their adherence to the ,act formerly emitted by this ,presbytery1 in condemnation of the universal scheme4 ,and they do hereby testify against1 and disapprove all partiality and unfaithfulness1 whether in respect of right or left hand extremes1 in any testimonies1 published in a way of professed adherence to reformation principles2 particularly1 they reject the testimony published by those designated the ,associate ,presbytery1 as no adequate testimony for truth1 because of the partiality and unfaithfulness1 both to ,god and the generation1 discovered therein2 being1 instead of a faithful vindication1 no better than a burial of some of the most important attainments in reformation of this church and land4 ,and they likewise reject1 detest and abhor that spurious brat1 stuffed with gross error1 blasphemy and nonsense1 most falsely and unjustly designated1 ,a testimony for the word of ,christ's patience1 by that sacrilegious usurper of the ministry1 ,william ,dunnet1 who1 being once plunged into the depths of enthusiasm1 such is his madness1 that under pretense of an immediate mission from heaven1 he not only daringly usurps the whole of the ministerial function1 but also wickedly claims an ,erastian exercise of the office of the civil magistrate1 in a stupid unaccountable declaration of war1 offensive and defensive1 against all mankind1 himself1 and his blind-folded confederates only excepted2 having probably had these anti-scriptural notions instilled into him by the industry of some unstable heads1 who1 after they had made a professed subjection to this ,presbytery1 in the ,lord1 did1 with some others of the same stamp1 in a most unwarrantable and schismatical manner1 break off from their communion1 without so much as discovering any shadow of reason1 in justification of their rash1 ungrounded and precipitate separation4 ,upon the whole1 the ,presbytery1 protesting that they have been influenced to this necessary work of displaying a judicial banner for the covenanted cause and interest of our exalted ,redeemer1 purely out of a regard to the glory of ,god1 a desire that ,christ's kingdom may be advanced1 and his buried truths revived1 as also a concern for the welfare and happiness of the present and succeeding generations1 do earnestly1 in the bowels of our ,lord ,jesus ,christ1 beseech and obtest all and every one1 into whose hands this testimony may come1 that1 without considering the insignificancy of the instruments1 and laying aside prejudice and carnal selfish considerations1 they receive the truth as it is in ,jesus1 not only in the notion1 but in the love and power of it2 that they take with the many just and highly aggravated grounds of the ,lord's controversy1 and causes of his wrath against us1 not only on account of private and personal wickedness come to a very great height1 but particularly on account of the general opposition to the public concerns of his glory1 in what respects the doctrine1 worship1 government and discipline of his house4 ,alas6 our public abominations are both obstinately persisted in and publicly justified4 ,that they lay to heart the great and terrible wickedness of the day and generation1 with deep humiliation before the ,lord1 while he waits to1 be gracious1 and is calling all ranks to humble themselves1 and saying1 ,rend your heart and not your garments1 and turn unto the ,lord your ,god1 for he is gracious and merciful2 ,joel ii1 #ac4 ,that1 in the way of flying under the covert of the atoning blood of the ,son of ,god1 by faith in his name1 for the remission of sins1 and endeavoring after personal reformation1 as to all the impiety and irreligion1 all the detestable indifferency1 lukewarmness and hypocrisy1 in the matters of ,god1 which universally prevail2 they also study and set about public reformation1 every one in their several stations1 according to our solemn national engagements1 concurring to restore the ,lord's ruined and buried work1 and rebuild his house1 which is now lying as a desolate heap1 covered over with the rubbish of manifold errors1 corruptions and human inventions4 ,if we still hold fast our abominations1 and will not1 by repentance and reformation1 return and give glory to the ,lord our ,god before he cause darkness1 then1 when he returns for the salvation of ,zion1 ,he will come treading down the people in his anger1 and making them drunk in his fury1 and bringing down their strength to the earth2 ,isa4 lxiii1 #f4 ,but is there no hope in ,israel concerning this thing8 ,is there no balm in ,gilead8 ,is there not a physician there8 ,is there not virtue in ,christ's blood for the most desperate cases1 that churches1 as well as particular persons1 can be in8 ,is there not ground to hope1 that the ,lord will not altogether forsake these sinful lands1 which were given to him of old for an inheritance1 and wherein he has so long maintained his possession1 but that he will yet build up our ,zion1 and appear in his glory therein1 will plead his own cause1 revive his own work1 a covenanted work of reformation1 and remove all the contempt and ignominy which it presently lies under8 ,sure the continuance of his gracious calls and invitations to return to him1 gives ground to hope1 that our ,israel hath not been forsaken1 nor ,judah of his ,god1 of the ,lord of ,hosts1 though their land was filled with sin against the holy ,one of ,israel2 ,jer4 li1 #e4 ,and though1 while so much of error1 prejudice and carnal interest1 lie as impassable mountains in the way1 there is little appearance of the nations taking this course yet the ,lord seems still to bespeak us in that endearing language1 ,jer4 iii1 #ab1 ,go and proclaim these words towards the north1 and say1 ,return thou backsliding ,israel1 saith the ,lord1 and ,i will not cause mine anger to fall upon you2 for ,i am merciful1 saith the ,lord1 and ,i will not keep anger forever4 ,though we have nationally torn our marriage contract with heaven1 and taken away our names1 yet the ,lord has not4 ,turn1 ,o backsliding children1 saith the ,lord1 for ,i am married unto you4 ,let all1 then1 repent1 and turn themselves from all their transgressions1 so iniquity shall not be their ruin2 but if not1 then let all the impenitent despisers of the repeated calls of mercy know1 that abused patience will at length turn into fury1 and the ,lord ,jehovah1 who has already furbished his sword1 and prepared the instruments of death1 will speedily give that dreadful commission to the executioners of his wrath3 ,put ye in the sickle1 for the harvest is ripe2 come1 get you down1 for the press is full1 the fats overflow1 for their wickedness is great3 ,joel iii1 #ac4 ,but because ,god will do this to ,israel1 let us prepare to meet our ,god4 ,further1 the ,presbytery invite and entreat all who tender the glory of ,god1 the removal of the causes of his wrath and indignation1 and who desire the continuance of his tabernacle and gracious presence among us1 to come and join in a harmonious1 zealous and faithful testimony for the precious truths and interest of ,zion's glorious ,king1 and against every course that has a tendency to heighten1 and at last to lay on the copestone of our defections4 ,consider it is the ,lord's call and command to every one1 even in their most private station1 ,contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints4 ,it is the burden he1 at this day1 lays on his church and people3 ,hold fast what thou hast till ,i come1 that no man take thy crown2 hold fast by our former attainments in reformation4 ,and finally1 the ,presbytery exhort all with whom they are more particularly connected1 ,to stand fast in one spirit1 with one mind1 striving together for the faith of the gospel1 and in nothing terrified by your adversaries4 ,let the flame of fervent and true love to ,god1 his truths1 and to one another1 prevent and extinguish the wild fire of unnecessary and hurtful mutual animosities2 and endeavoring to keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace1 study oneness in promoting the ,lord's opposed work1 and in walking in the good old way1 without turning aside to the right hand or to the left1 because of the lion that is therein1 and without laying other foundations than what were laid4 ,let none of ,christ's true and faithful witnesses suffer their hearts to sink into despondency2 the cause is the ,lord's1 and assuredly he will thoroughly plead that cause which is his own4 ,it will outlive all its enemies1 and yet have a glorious resurrection2 and this will be the crown and comfort of all such as continue1 amidst all trials and sufferings1 contending for him1 in the blessed expectation of the conqueror's everlasting reward4 ,therefore1 lift up the hands that hang down1 and strengthen the feeble knees2 greater afflictions have been accomplished in those that are gone before1 and are now inheriting the promises1 than any wherewith the ,lord is presently trying his church4 ,and as the ,god of all grace1 after they had suffered awhile1 made them perfect1 and put them in possession of that eternal glory to which they were called by ,jesus ,christ1 so shall he establish1 strengthen and keep his people still from falling1 and1 after all their sorrows and sufferings1 present them faultless before the presence of his glory1 with exceeding joy4 ,return1 we beseech thee1 ,o ,god of ,hosts2 look down from heaven1 and behold and visit this vine2 and the vineyard which thy right hand hath planted1 and the branch that thou madest strong for thyself1 it is burnt with fire1 it is cut down1 they perish at the rebuke of thy countenance4 ,let thy hand be upon the man of thy right hand1 upon the ,son of man whom thou madest strong for thyself1 so will not we go back from thee2 quicken us1 and we will call upon thy name2 turn us again1 ,o ,lord of ,hosts1 cause thy face to shine1 and we shall be saved3 ,let ,god arise1 let ,zion's immortal and omnipotent ,king ,jesus reign1 and let all his enemies be scattered2 but let them that love him be as the sun1 when he goeth forth in his might4 ,extracted by ,,jo4 ,,thorburn1 ,pr4 ,clk4 ,,addenda4 ,in addition to what is said 7from page #fe to #fg preceding1 respecting the establishment of ,popery in ,canada71 the ,presbytery deeply lament1 that1 in the present edition of their ,testimony1 they are furnished with fresh matter to animadvert upon the continued tendency of the ,british administration in favor of the religion of ,antichrist4 ,not long after the civil establishment of ,popery in ,canada1 new privileges1 civil and religious1 were bestowed upon the professors of that religion at home1 both in ,england and ,ireland1 by which ,catholics have received toleration1 under the sanction of law1 openly to profess and practice their idolatry1 to open seminaries of learning for the public instruction of youth in their own religion1 and to purchase and transfer estates to their ,popish relations1 in direct opposition to the established laws of the land1 framed by our ,protestant ancestors1 under the sense of felt necessity1 whereby ,catholics were laid under disabilities1 as to the enjoyment of those privileges1 which they saw to be inconsistent with the peace of the state and safety of the ,protestant religion1 on account of the barbarous massacres committed by ,catholics upon ,protestants1 and the numerous hostile attempts made to overturn1 by violence1 the ,protestant religion within these lands1 as proceeding from the sanguinary spirit of ,popery4 ,the modern plea set up in favor of those privileges being conferred upon ,popery1 that the ,catholics of this day have candidly renounced the whole of their old principles which they held1 as inimical to a ,protestant country1 never can be admitted1 while they still retain the most dangerous of all their principles1 viz41 implicit faith in the doctrines of supreme councils1 and the dispensing authority of the ,pope4 ,against this sinful indulgence granted to ,popery1 the ,presbytery testified at the time1 in a separate piece1 entitled1 ,a ,testimony and ,warning against the ,blasphemies and ,idolatries of ,popery1 c41 to which they still refer the reader4 ,an attempt also was made to extend a similar indulgence to ,catholics in ,scotland1 but which was happily frustrated through the zealous exertions of the people1 who1 pleading the established laws of the land1 boldly reclaimed against the measure1 which produced the desired effect of compelling the government to desist4 ,but alas6 no sooner1 was the popular zeal cooled1 than government sowed tares by enlarging the privileges of ,catholics with regard to civil property4 ,the deplorable fact now is1 that ,popery1 basking in the sunshine of legislative power1 advanced to the legal possession of new privileges1 and shielded by a formal toleration in the neighboring kingdoms1 may be considered as enjoying the actual protection of government in ,scotland4 ,in ,ireland1 privileges of a still more exalted nature are bestowed upon ,popery1 while the ,catholic is so far enfranchised1 that1 in conjunction with the ,protestant1 he may give his voice for members to serve in the legislature of the country4 ,what greatly adds to the evil is1 the lamentable alteration of public opinion1 so lately displayed against the measures of government in former indulgences bestowed upon the ,catholic interest2 but which has now changed into an entire approbation thereof1 both by the great body of the people and the minority in the two houses of ,parliament2 and the only complaint against government on that score is1 that1 stopping short of meeting just claims of ,catholics1 they have not ingrafted them into all the privileges of ,british subjects1 and for ever done away the odious distinction between ,protestant and ,catholic1 as to privilege4 ,when we open our eyes to the measures of the present day1 we behold still more abominations4 ,the government so far from remembering whence they are fallen1 repenting and doing their first works1 have started again in the cause of ,antichrist1 by leaguing themselves in a military expedition with a group of ,popish despots on the continent1 who have long given their power to the beast2 of this expedition one object evidently appears to be the re-establishment and support of ,popery in ,france1 where under the administration of the omnipotent1 and avenging holy providence of ,god1 in the pouring out of the vials of his wrath upon the beast1 that false religion has received a sore and bleeding wound1 and where the people1 long crushed under the tyranny of a despotic throne1 and usurpation of an imposing priesthood1 have risen to extricate themselves from the accumulated oppression1 and by their astonishing efforts have shaken off the ,papal yoke1 by renouncing their accustomed allegiance to the head of the ,antichristian states at ,rome1 have withdrawn their wonted supplies from his treasures1 and completely overthrown the temporal power of his religion in their own country1 which had for many ages kept them in fetters4 ,if any doubt should be entertained with regard to the support afforded to the sinking cause of ,popery in ,france by this expedition1 the declaration published by the brother of the late ,king of ,france1 stiling himself ,louis ,,xviii1 at the head of the emigrants in arms1 exhibits the fact in the clearest point of view1 while he plainly and unequivocally says1 in that declaration1 that their designs are the erection of the throne and altar1 by which are meant the civil government and the ,catholic religion1 as they existed in ,france prior to the revolution4 ,britain1 not satisfied with sending forth numerous hosts to the field abroad1 and lavishing her treasures to supply the exhausted finances of the coalesced powers1 has opened her arms at home to receive flying emigrants1 caressed by her1 as if they had been sufferers in the cause of genuine ,christianity4 ,by the voice of ,episcopal dignitaries the ,popish clergy have been extolled1 as men of the most eminent piety1 while places have been furnished by government1 to accommodate them in their mass service2 and a branch of the bloody house of ,bourbon1 whom divine vengeance has reduced to the abject state of a wandering exile1 is admitted among us1 with all marks of honor1 and1 with his train1 provided for1 as if he were a zealous supporter of the ,protestant cause1 seeking an asylum from the rage of ,papal persecution in this reformed land4 ,it cannot escape the notice of the attentive observer1 how closely the crown of ,britain has become allied to this false religion1 in consequence of the conquest of the island of ,corsica1 and the accession of the crown of that island to the crown of ,britain4 ,according to the new constitution of ,corsica1 the king of ,great ,britain1 as represented by his viceroy1 makes an essential branch of the parliament1 all the acts whereof must be assented to by him1 in order1 to give them the force of law4 ,now1 it is to be remarked1 that in this constitution ,popery is expressly declared to be the only established religion in the island2 it is therefore agreed to be divided into districts1 to be filled up with ministers of the ,catholic religion1 endowed with legal maintenance4 ,so the king of ,britain1 as wearing the ,corsican crown1 engages to unite this constitutional establishment of the ,catholic religion1 the king of ,great ,britain1 as the king of ,corsica1 gives his firm assent4 ,moreover1 to provide for the more extensive propagation of ,popery in ,corsica1 the legislature stipulate to consult with the ,see of ,rome2 here1 also1 he engages to join the wisdom of his counsels to those of the ,pope1 for the express purpose of giving a wider spread to ,popery4 ,if the prophet ,jehu accused ,jehoshaphat1 though a good prince1 when he was returning from a military expedition with ,ahab1 king of ,israel1 in such cutting language2 #b ,chron4 xix1 #b1 ,shouldst thou help the ungodly1 and love them that hate the ,lord8 therefore1 is wrath upon thee from the ,lord3 in what words shall we pronounce upon this conduct of ,britain1 in mixing with her politics and wars1 active measures to raise again the falling ,dagon of ,popery from the threshold1 and to help forward the interests of a religion which the ,lord has solemnly declared he will destroy with the judgments of his hand and the brightness of his coming4 ,besides the iniquity of the thing itself1 in giving direct aid to this religion2 our guilt derives great aggravations from a view of the present dispensations of ,providence in visibly sending down terrible judgments 7no matter through what rough hands7 upon that anti-christian power1 that has long1 sat upon many waters2 and the loud voice of ,jehovah is uttering1 on the awful crisis of its downfall1 to all the fearers of his name to escape a share in its judgments1 by flying away from all communion with its evils2 ,rev4 xviii1 #d1 ,come out of her1 my people1 that ye be not partakers of her sins1 and that ye receive not of her plagues4 ,but1 blind to his avenging hand1 and deaf to this summons1 ,great ,britain1 once without1 is now again returning into a most unlawful communion to support this adjudged power1 by which she constitutes herself a partner in its sins1 and thereby exposes herself to a portion of its plagues4 ,in vain will it be urged as a plea of justification1 that the authors of the revolution in ,france1 having overturned the constitution of their own country1 and spread desolation through the wide extent of it1 menaced other nations1 and us also2 and that1 therefore1 ,britain1 acting on the first principle of nature's law1 self-preservation1 joined the allied powers for her own defense4 ,though the ,presbytery are by no means to be understood as giving their suffrage for the lawfulness and justice of the war on our side2 yet1 for the sake of argument1 allowing the plea--what then8 ,will this sanctify the measures adopted by ,britain1 in recovering1 supporting and propagating the cause of ,popery1 that the conquest of the enemy1 and her own safety are the ends ultimately to be gained by them8 ,the ,christian maxim1 that evil is not to be done that good may come1 binds as strongly nations as individuals4 ,popery is not a local evil2 it is still the mystery of iniquity1 as much in ,france1 and in ,corsica1 as it is in ,great ,britain2 it is everywhere the forbidden fruit1 not to be touched4 ,if the security of a ,protestant country is to be sought for1 in dependence upon1 or in any state of connection with the co-existence and maintenance of ,antichrist1 we have indeed a feeble pillar to rest upon1 for1 as sure as ,god himself has spoken it1 the ,papal kingdoms are the ,babylon to fall and to rise no more again at all4 ,perhaps1 our allies would not be pleased with another mode of conduct2 and shall we run the hazard of displeasing the ,god of all our salvation1 to gratify1 in sin1 the friends of the man of sin8 ,if the crown of ,corsica cannot be worn1 but upon the condition of supporting ,popery1 and joining in councils with the ,church of ,rome1 to advance her interest there1 we are afraid the weight of it1 like a millstone1 will sink us deep in the gulf of ,god's wrath4 ,but ,popery was the former religion of that island1 and the people wished no change4 ,if the wretched inhabitants1 loving darkness rather than the light1 refused to be reclaimed1 leave them to themselves1 but why should we have fellowship with them in their unfruitful works of darkness4 ,the ,presbytery would not wish to be understood as if they meant that ,protestants ought to raise a crusade1 in order to exterminate ,catholics in foreign lands1 as ,catholics have attempted to do against ,protestants1 for the weapons of our warfare1 in propagating religion are not carnal4 ,but it certainly is the incumbent duty of all ,protestant nations to abstain from anything1 that has a tendency to uphold and propagate their religion2 and as no positive countenance should be given to it1 so it is highly proper that ,catholics should be kept in such a state of restraint1 as they may not again have it in their power to repeat those bloody scenes1 which ,popery had acted upon us4 ,with a view to deliver themselves from the guilt of participating in the evil1 the ,presbytery do lift up a judicial testimony against the present anti-christian courses of administration2 as1 also1 against those state fasts1 proceeding from an ,erastian supremacy1 which have been appointed to be observed by all persons1 in order to engage by prayer the ,almighty to crown their measures with success4 ,likewise1 the ,presbytery do testify against the national church1 particularly her ministers1 who from their station ought to act as spiritual watchmen1 and give pointed warning of sin and danger on the present occasion2 but1 who1 instead of faithfully discharging this duty1 sanction all these measures of government1 which cannot fail to produce a hardening effect upon the generation4 ,n4,b4 ,since writing the above1 by a reverse in the war1 ,britain has lost possession of ,corsica1 but while this does not acquit her of the guilt of her anti-christian administration there1 neither will it supersede the necessity of our testimony against it4 99 99 99 99 99 ,,advertisement4 ,the late ,reformed ,presbytery1 ,june #b;d1 #ahde1 adopted the following doctrinal and practical declarations4 ,they have therefore a judicial sanction2 and having been in overture before the people prior to the action of ,presbytery1 we subjoin them as a suitable supplement4 ,cincinnati1 ,nov4 #abth1 #ahej4 ,,judicial ,,declarations4 #a4 ,man is a free agent1 unconscious of restraint in his volitions by the execution of the immutable decree of ,god2 and it is not possible for him1 in any instance1 to avoid fulfilling that decree3 yet the law of ,god--not his decree--is the rule of man's conduct1 and the standard of final judgment4 #b4 ,it is the duty of a ,christian to pray for the church of ,christ--to inquire diligently into her scriptural character1 and to seek covenant blessings in her communion4 #c4 ,if the majority should violate the terms upon which church members were united1 it is lawful for the minority to testify against the defection1 and to walk by the rule of their former attainments4 ,and when any community assuming to be the ,church of ,christ1 imposes sinful terms of communion--when the constitution is anti-scriptural--when the administration is corrupt1 and attempts at its reformation have proved ineffectual--it is the duty of ,christians to separate from it3 ,come out of her1 my people1 c42 ,rev4 xviii1 #d4 #d4 ,no member of the ,reformed ,presbyterian ,church can1 without contracting guilt1 in the present state of society1 take the oath of allegiance to the government of these ,united ,states1 hold office1 exercise the elective franchise1 act as a juror1 or hold communion in other ecclesiastical bodies1 by what is commonly styled occasional hearing2 ,rev4 xi1 #a-c4 ,,terms ,,of ,,ministerial ,,and ,,christian ,,communion ,,in ,,the ,,reformed ,,presbyterian ,,church4 99 99 99 99 99 #a4 ,an acknowledgment of the ,old and ,new ,testament to be the ,word of ,god1 and the alone infallible rule of faith and practice4 #b4 ,an acknowledgement that the whole doctrine of the ,westminster ,confession of ,faith1 and the ,catechisms1 larger and shorter1 are agreeable unto1 and founded upon the ,scriptures4 #c4 ,an acknowledgment that ,presbyterian ,church government is of divine right1 and unalterable3 and that the most perfect model as yet attained1 is exhibited in the ,form of ,government and ,directory for ,worship1 as adopted by the ,church of ,scotland1 in the ,second ,reformation4 #d4 ,an acknowledgment that public1 social covenanting1 is an ordinance of ,god1 and obligatory on churches and nations under the ,new ,testament dispensation3 and that the ,national ,covenant of ,scotland1 and the ,solemn ,league and ,covenant of ,scotland1 ,england and ,ireland1 were an exemplification of this divine institution3 and that these solemn deeds are of perpetual obligation upon the moral person1 as continued by representation and accession3 and in consistency with this1 acknowledging the renovation of these covenants at ,auchensaugh1 #agab1 to be agreeable to the ,word of ,god4 #e4 ,an approbation of the faithful contendings of the martyrs of ,jesus1 against paganism1 popery1 prelacy1 malignancy1 and sectarianism2 and against immoral constitutions of civil government--,erastian tolerations and persecutions which flow therefrom3 the ,judicial ,act1 ,declaration and ,testimony1 emitted by the ,reformed ,presbytery in ,north ,britain1 #agfa1 together with the ,historical and ,declaratory ,supplements adopted by the ,reformed ,church in ,north ,america1 #ahej--;as containing an noble example for their posterity to follow1 in contending for all divine truth1 and in testifying against all corruptions embodied in the constitutions of either church or ,state4 #f4 ,practically adorning the doctrine of ,god our ,savior1 by walking in all his commandments and ordinances blamelessly4 ,,footnotes3 ,footnote #a3 ,christ's rights1 c4 ,by these are not meant the rights of ,christ personal4 ,it is not in the power of mortals1 or any creature1 to acquire and secure these to him2 but the rights of ,christ mystical1 that is1 of the church1 or1 of his truth1 true worship1 and religion1 and professors of it as such4 ,footnote #b3 ,besides the above instances of that unholy1 tyrannical1 and church-robbing policy1 which has been exercised by the supreme civil powers in these nations with reference to religion and the worship of ,god1 all of which existed when the presbytery first published their testimony1 there has1 of late1 a very singular instance of the same kind occurred1 in the course of administration1 which the presbytery cannot forbear to take notice of1 but must embrace the present opportunity to declare their sense of1 and testify against2 and especially1 as it is one that carries a more striking evidence than any of the former1 of our public national infidelity and licentiousness1 and of our being judicially infatuated in our national counsels1 and given up of heaven to proceed from evil to worse1 in the course of apostasy from the cause and principles of the reformation4 ,we particularly mean the instance of a late bill or act1 which has been agreed upon by both houses of parliament1 and which also1 ,june1 #aggd1 was sanctioned with the royal assent1 entitled ,an act for making more effectual provision for the government of the province of ,quebec in ,north ,america4 ,by which act1 not only is ,french despotism1 or arbitrary power1 settled as the form of civil government1 but1 which is still worse1 ,popery1 the ,religion of ,antichrist1 with all its idolatries and blasphemies1 has such security and establishment granted it1 as to be taken immediately under the legal protection of the supreme civil authority of these nations in that vast and extensive region of ,canada1 lately added to the ,british dominions in ,north ,america--a province so large and fertile1 that it is said to be capable of containing1 if fully peopled1 not less than thirty millions of souls4 ,this infamous and injurious bill1 before it passed into a law1 was publicly reprobated and declaimed against by sundry members of both houses4 ,it has been petitioned and remonstrated against by the most respectable civil body corporated in ,britain1 or its dominions1 the city of ,london2 by all the provinces of ,north ,america south of ,quebec2 and even by the inhabitants of the city of ,quebec itself4 ,it has been1 in the most public manner1 in open parliament1 declared to be a most cruel1 oppressive1 and odious measure--a child of inordinate power1 c4 ,all which are sufficient indications how scandalous1 offensive1 and obnoxious this act was4 ,there was afterward1 in the month of ,may1 #agge1 a bill brought into the house of lords1 in order to effectuate the repeal of the foresaid disgraceful act1 when1 in the course of public debate1 it was represented by those few members of the house who appeared in the opposition1 as one of the most destructive1 most despotic1 most nefarious acts that ever passed the house of peers4 ,but all in vain--the repeal could not be effected4 ,and moreover1 let it be further observed here1 that the bench of bishops in the house of peers1 who assume the anti-christian title of spiritual lords1 and pretend to claim a seat in parliament for the care of religion1 during the whole course of this contest1 instead of appearing for the ,protestant interest1 have1 to their lasting infamy1 publicly distinguished themselves in opposition to it1 by--,standing forth the avowed supporters of ,popery4 ,the presbytery1 therefore1 find themselves in duty obliged1 in their judicative capacity1 principally in behalf of the rights and interests of the great ,god and of his ,son ,jesus ,christ our ,redeemer--that is to say1 in behalf of the rights of truth1 true religion1 and righteousness among men1 which he ever owns as his1 to add1 as they hereby do1 their public testimony against this nefandous national deed1 so manifestly injurious to all these4 ,the presbytery do not1 as some others1 found their testimony against this extravagant act establishing ,popery1 c41 in ,canada1 solely or simply on its injuriousness to the private interests of men--their bodily lives1 goods1 or outward privileges2 nor do they declare against and condemn it merely because that religion which is sanctioned with this national decree and engagement for its defense is a sanguinary one3 ,has deluged our island in blood1 and dispersed impiety1 persecution1 and murder1 c41 through the world4 7,see an address from the general congress to the people of ,great ,britain47 ,these are all indeed incontestable proofs that it is not the religion of the divine ,jesus1 but of antichrist4 ,nevertheless1 the same have been known to be the staple and constant fruits of ,prelacy too1 which1 to the extent of its reach and influence1 has as much ,christian blood wrapped up in its skirts as ,popery1 if not more4 ,nor yet is it merely on account that it is greatly injurious1 as indeed it is1 and a notorious breach of the public faith to the ,british ,protestant settlers in that province4 ,the presbytery's particular objections against this extraordinary measure are of a different quality4 ,they are briefly such as follow3 #a4 ,the iniquity of it against ,god4 ,it is certainly a deed highly provoking and dishonoring to the ,god of heaven4 ,for 7#a71 it is a giving that public protection and countenance to a lie1 i4e4 to idolatry and false worship 7and to anti-christian idolatry1 the worst of all other71 which is only due to the truth of ,god4 ,it is a devoting and giving our national power to the preservation of the life of the ,romish beast1 after the deadly wound given it by the ,reformation4 ,and therefore 7#b71 a most wretched prostitution of the ordinance of civil power1 sacred by its divine institution1 to be a terror and restraint to evil doers1 and a praise to them that do well1 ,rom4 xiii1--to the quite contrary purposes4 ,what right have open idolaters and blasphemers to be protected and supported by any ordinance of ,god in the public acts of their idolatry8 ,and how awful is it to think 7#c71 that it is a setting ourselves openly to fight against ,god1 in a national engagement to support and defend what ,god has declared and testified to us in his word1 he will have destroyed2 and wherein he expressly forbids giving the least countenance to idolatry4 ,and shall we thus harden ourselves against ,god and prosper8 7#d71 ,as this last instance of our profane national policy is a still more open discovery of our incorrigibleness in our apostasy1 so it is also the most striking of all the former of that ,erastianism and spiritual supremacy exercised by the civil powers in these lands over the church and kingdom of ,christ4 ,herein we have an open and avowed justification of that anti-scriptural right and power claimed by them to settle and establish whatever mode of religion they please1 or is most agreeable to the inclinations of the people1 or which best answers their worldly political purposes1 although it should be the religion of ,satan in place of that of ,christ4 ,this has been the great leading principle all along since the ,revolution1 but never more openly discovered than in this instance4 ,upon all which it may appear how sinful and provoking to the divine ,majesty this act must be4 #b4 ,the folly and shamefulness of it as to ourselves4 ,how disgraceful and dishonorable is this public act in favor of ,popery1 even to the nation itself1 and its representatives1 who me the authors of it4 ,how palpably inconsistent is it with our national character and profession as ,protestant1 and with our national establishments1 civil and ecclesiastical 7both which are professedly built upon reformation from ,popery71 to come to take that idolatrous religion under our national protection1 and become defenders of the anti-christian faith2 nay1 were it competent for the presbytery as a spiritual court1 and spiritual watchmen1 to view this act in a civil light1 they might show at large1 that it is a violation of the fundamental national constitutions of the kingdom1 and reaches a blow to the credit of the legal security granted to the ,protestant religion at home4 ,we need not here mention how contrary this act is to the fundamental laws and constitutions of the kingdom of ,scotland1 which are now set aside4 ,but it is contrary to1 and a manifest violation of the ,revolution and ,british constitution itself2 contrary to the ,claim of ,right1 yea1 to the oath solemnly sworn by every ,english and ,british sovereign upon their accession to the throne1 as settled by an act of the ,english parliament in the first year of ,william ,,iii4 ,by which they are obliged to profess1 and to the utmost of their power maintain1 in all their dominions1 the laws of ,god1 the true profession of the gospel1 and the true reformed religion established by law4 ,but these things the presbytery leave to such whom it may more1 properly concern4 ,let it1 however1 be observed that the presbytery are not here to be interpreted as approving of the abovesaid oath1 as it designedly obliges to the maintenance of the abjured ,english hierarchy and popish ceremonies1 which might better be called a true reformed lie1 than the true reformed religion4 ,nevertheless1 this being the ,british coronation oath1 it clearly determines that all legal establishments behoove to be ,protestant1 and that without a violation of said oath1 no other religion can be taken under protection of law but what is called ,protestant religion only4 ,the presbytery conclude the whole of this additional remark with observing1 ,that as in the former instances of the exercise of this ,erastian power above mentioned1 the present church of ,scotland never gave evidence of her fidelity to ,christ1 so far as to testify against them2 so their assembly has1 in a like supine1 senseless manner1 conducted themselves with reference to this last and most alarming instance4 ,notwithstanding all that has been remonstrated against it1 and in favor of the reformed religion1 they have remained mute and silent1 which indeed evidences them not to be truly deserving of the character of venerable and reverend1 which they assume to themselves1 but rather that of an association2 or1 in the words of the weeping prophet1 an assembly of treacherous men3 ,jer4 ix1 #b4 ,footnote #c3 ,see pages #fh1 #fi1 preceding4 ,footnote #d3 ,mr4 ,andrew ,clarkson originally belonged to the community of ,old ,dissenters under the pastoral inspection of the ,rev4 ,mr4 ,john ,mc,millan senior2 was educated and lived in communion with them1 till upwards of the age of thirty years2 during which time he wrote and published a book1 entitled1 ,plain ,reasons1 c41 setting forth the grounds why ,presbyterian ,dissenters refused to hold communion with the revolution1 church and state2 but1 having no prospect of obtaining license and ordination among them1 in regard they had then no ordained minister belonging to them but old ,mr4 ,mc,millan alone1 it appeared that1 from a passionate desire after these privileges1 he left his old friends1 and made his application to the ,associate ,presbytery1 who treated him as above narrated4 ,footnote #e3 ,mr4 ,john ,cameron1 then a probationer and clerk to their ,presbytery4 ,footnote #f3 ,these people1 referred to above1 very unjustly designate themselves such who adhere to the testimony for the kingly prerogative of ,christ4 ,they did at first1 before their agreement with the ,presbytery1 and ever since their elopement1 do still profess to appear for what they call ,an ,active ,testimony1 conform to the rude draft of a paper commonly known by the name of the ,queensferry ,paper or ,covenant 7see ,cloud of ,witnesses1 ,appendix1 page #bgj74 ,after their activity had carried them the length of avouching the most inconsistent anti-predestinarian1 ,arminian schemes of universal redemption1 and not only to a total separation from the ,presbytery1 and rejection of their judicial authority1 but even to an open denial of the protestative mission of the ministers therein1 and of all others2 the most part of them were1 in ,god's holy and righteous justice1 left to receive and submit to the pretended authority and ministrations of ,william ,dunnet1 a deceiver1 destitute of all mission and authority1 whom they were afterward obliged to abandon ,in #agga1 they published a pamphlet entitled1 ,a short ,abstract of their ,principles and ,designs4 ,in this they cunningly evade the acknowledgment of our ,confession of ,faith and ,catechisms1 decline to own the doctrine of the holy ,trinity in unity1 and do professedly adopt and avow the hypothesis of the famous modern ,socinian1 ,dr4 ,taylor1 of ,norwich1 anent the person of ,christ4 ,according to which he is no more than a glorious being1 truly created by ,god before the world4 ,this pre-existent creature they call a superangelic spirit2 which spirit1 coming in time to be united to a human body1 makes according to them1 the person of ,christ4 ,a person neither truly ,god nor truly man1 but a sort of being different from both4 ,the absurdity and blasphemy of this hypothesis needs no elucidation4 ,thus they idolatrously worship another god than the ,scripture reveals1 and blasphemously substitute and trust in another savior than the gospel offers unto sinners4 ,in the same pamphlet they declare and publish their resolution to take some of their number under formal trials1 whom1 upon being approved1 they might appoint and send forth to preach the gospel and administer the ordinances of it4 ,and all which they have accordingly done1 to the great dishonor of ,god1 reproach of religion1 and the profession of it4 ,and now1 from the above principles and practices1 the reader may justly conclude how unworthily these ,christians 7if they may be called such7 profess to stand up for the royal prerogatives of ,christ4 ,what an arrogant and presumptuous invasion upon1 and usurpation of1 the powers and prerogatives of this glorious ,king1 for any mortal to assume to appoint and call men1 not to the work 7which yet is all that the ,church of ,christ1 according to the will of ,god1 and her privileges from ,christ her head1 ever claimed71 but to the very power and office of the holy ministry1 and to install them in it4 ,besides1 that their doctrine as to ,christ's person1 which denies his divine nature and sonship1 saps the very foundations of that and all his other offices4 ,we would1 therefore1 yet beseech them1 by the mercies of ,god1 to repent them of all their wickedness1 and to pray ,god1 if perhaps the thoughts of their heart may be forgiven them4 ,footnote #g3 ,it has been complained by some1 that the sense of both the members of this particular paragraph is obscure1 and not so intelligible as it should be to many readers2 but this complaint seems rather to arise from the want of proper attention and consideration1 than from any other cause4 ,as to the first branch of the sentence1 ,among--,such actions and things as are necessary1 and in themselves just and lawful by a moral obligation--may be reckoned the payment of county tolls on highways and bridges1 for the benefit of an easy and commodious passage--keeping watch in cities which have no settled or regular guard1 to prevent public damage by fire or otherwise4 ,in like manner1 the payment of custom in public markets or fairs1 or of town dues1 all of which1 being intended for the benefit of public corporations1 are given or paid as the price of liberty and privilege of trade and commerce4 ,and to this may be added1 such necessary instances of self-defense as a person may be obliged to1 when maliciously and villanously attacked in his character or goods1 by persons perhaps designedly taking advantage of his ,christian temper1 or profession4 ,or when perhaps a person may be maliciously charged with1 and prosecuted for crimes not only peculiarly dishonorable to religion1 but even capital1 as has been the case with some individuals4 ,in all such cases1 self-defense at law becomes necessary before the ordinary courts and judges of any nation1 or place of the world whatever1 when such defenses are admitted without the formal and explicit acknowledgment of the lawfulness of unjust or usurped authority 7when such happens to be in place1 as in the instance of ,paul's appeal to ,caesar1 ,acts xxv71 or acting any otherwise contrary to justice and charity4 ,and with regard to the other branch of the sentence where it is observed--,that a difference ought to made between those things that cannot be had1 nor yet the value and equivalent of them1 unless the person actually give it1 c43 ,this is sufficiently explained in a paragraph1 page #afc1 near the foot4 ,prayers for ,god's blessing on any government--enlisting and bearing arms in their service--accepting offices and places of power from them--swearing oaths of fidelity to them1 c4--are such things as can by no means be got1 nor yet the equivalent of them1 unless the party actually consents and grants them4 ,these1 therefore1 and1 such like1 are the only instances of action which1 the ,presbytery judge1 do1 in their own nature1 contain and express a proper and explicit acknowledgment of the lawfulness of that authority which they immediately respect4