,,! ,,creative ,,process ,,9 ,,! ,,individual ,,by ,t4 ,,tr[>d #aiae ,,=eword ,9 ! pres5t volume ,i h endeavor$ to set be=e ! read] ! conception ( a sequ5ce ( creative action comm5c+ ) ! =mation ( ! globe & culm9at+ 9 a vi/a ( inf9ite possibilities atta9able by e "o :o foll[s up ! "r l9e = _! unfoldm5t4 ,i h endeavor$ to %[ t1 />t+ ) c]ta9 incontrov]tible sci5tific facts1 all ^! ?+s logically foll[1 & t !re=e1 h[ev] f> ^! speculations may c>ry u beyond our pa/ exp]i5ce1 !y n[h]e break ! ?read ( an intelligible connection ( cause & effect4 ,i d n1 h[ev]1 (f] ! sugge/ions "h put =w>d 9 any o!r light ?an t ( purely speculative reason+2 nev]!less1 no advance 9 any direction c be made except by speculative reason+ go+ back to ! fir/ pr9ciples ( ?+s :i* we d "k & !nce d$uc+ ! conditions "u :i* ! same pr9ciples might be c>ri$ fur!r & made to produce results hi!rto unkn[n4 ,x is to ?is me?od ( ?\ght t we owe all ! advantages ( civilization f mat*es & po/-(fices to motor-c>s & a]oplanes1 & we may !re=e be enc\rag$ to hope su* speculations z ! pres5t may n be )\t _! ultimate value4 ,rely+ on ! maxim t ,pr9ciple is n b\nd by ,prec$5t we %\ld n limit our expectations ( ! future2 & if our speculations lead u to ! conclusion t we h rea*$ a po9t :]e we are n only able1 b also requir$1 by ! law ( our own be+1 to take a m active "p 9 our p]sonal evolution ?an h]et(ore1 ?is discov]y w af=d u a new outlook ^u life & wid5 our horizon ) fre% int]e/s & bright5+ hopes4 ,if ! ?\ghts "h sugge/$ %\ld help any read] to cle> "s m5tal ob/acles f 8 pa? ! writ] w feel t he has n writt5 to no purpose4 ,only ea* read] mu/ ?9k out ^! sugge/ions = himself4 ,no writ] or lectur] c convey an idea into ! m9ds ( 8 audi5ce4 ,he c only put x be=e !m1 & :at !y w make ( x dep5ds entirely ^u !mselves--assimilation is a process :i* no "o c c>ry out = u4 ,to ! k9dness ( my read]s on bo? sides ( ! ,atlantic1 & 9 ,au/ralia & ,new ,zeal&1 ,i comm5d ?is little volume1 n1 inde$1 )\t a deep s5se ( its _m %ortcom+s1 b at ! same "t enc\rag$ by ! g5]\s indulg5ce ext5d$ to my previ\s books4 ,t4,t4 ,june1 #aiaj4 ,,cont5ts ,i ,,! ,,/>t+-,,po9t ,,ii ,,! ,,self-,,contemplation ,,( ,,_s ,,iii ,,! ,,div9e ,,ideal ,,iv ,,! ,,manife/ation ,,( ,,! ,,life ,,pr9ciple ,v ,,! ,,p]sonal ,,factor ,,vi ,,! ,,/&>d ,,( ,,p]sonality ,,vii ,,race ,,?\ght ,,& ,,new ,,?\ght ,,viii ,,! ,d,,n\em5t ,,( ,,! ,,creative ,,process ,,ix ,,conclusion ,x ,,! ,,div9e ,,(f]+ ,,xi ,,ourselves ,,9 ,,! ,,div9e ,,(f]+ ,i say no man has ev] yet be5 half dev\t en\gh1 ,none has ev] yet ador$ or wor%ip'd half en\gh1 ,none has begun to ?9k h[ div9e he himself is1 & h[ c]ta9 ! future is4 ,i say t ! real & p]man5t gr&eur ( ^! ,/ates mu/ be _! religion1 ,o!rwise !re is no real & p]man5t gr&eur4 --,,walt ,,:itman4 ,,*apt] ,i ,,! ,,/>t+-,,po9t ,x is an old say+ t ,ord] is ,heav5's ,fir/ ,law1 & l _m o!r old say+s x conta9s a mu* deep] philosophy ?an appe>s imm$iately on ! surface4 ,gett+ ?+s into a bett] ord] is ! great secret ( progress1 & we are n[ able to fly ?r\gh ! air1 n because ! laws ( ,nature h alt]$1 b because we h le>nt to arrange ?+s 9 ! "r ord] to produce ?is result--! ?+s !mselves _h exi/$ f ! beg9n+ ( ! _w1 b :at 0 want+ 0 ! introduction ( a ,p]sonal ,factor :i*1 by an intellig5t p]ception ( ! possibilities conta9$ 9 ! laws ( ,nature1 %\ld be able to br+ into work+ reality ideas :i* previ\s g5]ations w\ld h laugh$ at z ! absurd fancies ( an unbalanc$ m9d4 ,! lesson to be le>nt f ! practical aviation ( ! pres5t day is t ( ! triumph ( pr9ciple ov] prec$5t1 ( ! work+ out ( an idea to its logical conclusions 9 spite ( ! accumulat$ te/imony ( all pa/ exp]i5ce to ! contr>y2 & ) su* a notable example be=e u c we say t x is futile to enquire :e!r by ! same me?od we may n unlock /ill m important secrets & ga9 "s k ( ! unse5 causes :i* are at ! back ( ext]nal & visible conditions1 & !n by br++ ^! unse5 causes into a bett] ord] make practical work+ realities ( possibilities :i* at pres5t seem b fanta/ic dreams8 ,x is at lea/ wor? :ile tak+ a prelim9>y cant] ov] ! c\rse1 & ?is is all t ?is little volume pr(esses to attempt2 yet ?is may be suffici5t to %[ ! lay ( ! gr\nd4 ,n[ ! fir/ ?+ 9 any inve/igation is to h "s idea ( :at y are look+ =--to h at lea/ "s notion ( ! g5]al direction 9 :i* to g--j z y w\ld n g up a tree to f9d fi% ?\gh y w\ld = birds' eggs4 ,well1 ! g5]al direction 9 :i* we all want to g is t ( gett+ m out ( ,life ?an we h ev] got out ( x--we want to be m alive 9 ourselves & to get all sorts ( improv$ conditions 9 our environm5t4 ,h[ev] happily any ( u may be circum/anc$ we c all conceive some?+ /ill bett]1 or at any rate we %\ld l to make our pres5t good p]man5t2 & s9ce we %all f9d z our /udies advance t ! prospect ( increas+ possibilities keeps op5+ out m & m widely be=e u1 we may say t :at we are 9 se>* ( is ! secret ( gett+ m out ( ,life 9 a cont9ually progressive degree4 ,?is means t :at we are look+ = is some?+ p]sonal1 & t x is to be obta9$ by produc+ conditions :i* d n yet exi/2 9 o!r words x is no?+ less ?an ! ex]cise ( a c]ta9 creative p[] 9 ! sph]e ( our own p>ticul> _w4 ,s1 !n1 :at we want is to introduce our own ,p]sonal ,factor into ! realm ( unse5 causes4 ,?is is a big ?+1 & if x is possible at all x mu/ be by "s sequ5ce ( cause & effect1 & ?is sequ5ce x is our object to discov]4 ,! law ( ,cause & ,effect is "o we c nev] get away f1 b by c>efully foll[+ x up we may f9d t x w lead u fur!r ?an we _h anticipat$4 ,n[1 ! fir/ ?+ to obs]ve is t if we c succe$ 9 f9d+ out su* a sequ5ce ( cause & effect z ! "o we are 9 se>* (1 somebody else may f9d out ! same creative secret also2 & !n1 by ! hypo!sis ( ! case1 we %\ld bo? be arm$ ) an infallible p[]1 & if we want$ to employ ?is p[] aga9/ ea* o!r we %\ld be l&$ 9 ! impasse ( a conflict betwe5 two p[]s ea* ( :i* 0 irresi/ible4 ,consequ5tly x foll[s t ! fir/ pr9ciple ( ?is p[] mu/ be ,h>mony4 ,x _c be antagoniz+ itself f diff]5t c5t]s--9 o!r words its op]ation 9 a simultane\s ord] at e po9t is ! fir/ necessity ( its be+4 ,:at we are 9 se>* (1 !n1 is a sequ5ce ( cause & effect s univ]sal 9 its nature z to include h>moni\sly all possible v>iations ( individual expression4 ,?is prim>y necessity ( ! ,law = :i* we are seek+ %\ld be c>efully borne 9 m9d1 = x is obvi\s t any sequ5ce :i* transgresses ?is prim>y ess5tial mu/ be contr>y to ! v nature ( ! ,law itself1 & consequ5tly _c be conduct+ u to ! ex]cise ( true creative p[]4 ,:at we are seek+1 !re=e1 is to discov] h[ to arrange ?+s 9 su* an ord] z to set 9 motion a tra9 ( causation t w h>monize our own conditions )\t antagoniz+ ! ex]cise ( a l p[] by o!rs4 ,?is !re=e means t all individual ex]cise ( ?is p[] is ! p>ticul> application ( a univ]sal p[] :i* itself op]ates creatively on its own acc\nt indep5d5tly ( ^! individual applications2 & ! h>mony betwe5 ! v>i\s individual applications is br\ght ab\t by all ! individuals br++ _! own p>ticul> action into l9e ) ?is indep5d5t creative action ( ! orig9al p[]4 ,x is 9 fact ano!r application ( ,euclid's axiom t ?+s :i* are equal to ! same ?+ are equal to "o ano!r2 s t ?\gh ,i may n "k = :at purpose "s "o may be us+ ?is creative p[] 9 ,pek91 ,i d "k t if he & ,i bo? realize its true nature1 we _c by any possibility be work+ 9 opposition to "o ano!r4 ,= ^! reasons1 hav+ n[ "s g5]al idea ( :at x is we are 9 se>* (1 we may comm5ce our inve/igation by consid]+ ?is common factor :i* mu/ be at ! back ( all individual ex]cise ( creative p[]1 t is to say1 ! ,g5]ic work+ ( ! ,univ]sal ,creative ,pr9ciple4 ,t su* a ,univ]sal ,creative ,pr9ciple is at "w we at once realize f ! exi/5ce ( ! _w ar\nd u ) all its inhabitants1 & ! int]-relation ( all p>ts ( ! cosmic sy/em %[s its und]ly+ ,unity--?us ! animal k+dom dep5ds on ! vegetable1 ! vegetable k+dom on ! m9]al1 ! m9]al or globe ( ! e>? on its relation to ! re/ ( ! sol> sy/em1 & possibly our sol> sy/em is relat$ by a simil> law to ! di/ribution ( o!r suns ) _! att5dant planets ?r\gh\t space4 ,our fir/ glance !re=e %[s u t ! ,all-orig9at+ ,p[] mu/ be 9 ess5ce ,unity & 9 manife/ation ,multiplicity1 & t x manife/s z ,life & ,beauty ?r\gh ! un]r+ adaptation ( means to ends--t is s f> z its cosmic manife/ation ( ends goes3 :at we want to d is to c>ry ?is manife/ation /ill fur!r by op]ation f an individual /&po9t4 ,to d ?is is precisely our place 9 ! ,ord] ( ,creation1 b we mu/ def] ! "q :y we hold ?is place till lat] on4 ,"o ( ! e>lie/ discov]ies we all make is ! exi/5ce ( ,matt]4 ,! bruis$ %9s ( our *ildhood conv9ce u ( its solidity1 s n[ comes ! "q1 ,:y does ,matt] exi/8 ,! answ] is t if ! =m 7 n express$ 9 solid sub/ance1 ?+s w\ld be p]petually fl[+ into ea* o!r s t no id5tity c\ld be ma9ta9$ = a s+le mom5t4 ,to ?is x might be repli$ t a condition ( matt] is conceivable 9 :i*1 ?\gh 9 itself a pla/ic sub/ance1 9 a flu5t /ate1 x might yet by ! op]ation ( w be held 9 any p>ticul> =ms desir$4 ,! idea ( su* a condition ( matt] is no d\bt conceivable1 & :5 ! flu5t matt] 0 ?us held 9 p>ticul> =ms y w\ld h concrete matt] j z we "k x n[1 only ) ?is diff]5ce1 t x w\ld return to its flu5t /ate z soon z ! support+ w 0 )drawn4 ,n[1 z we %all see lat] on1 ?is is precisely :at matt] really is1 only ! w :i* holds x toge!r 9 concrete =m is n individual b cosmic4 ,9 itself ! ,ess5ce ( ,matt] is precisely ! flu5t sub/ance we h imag9$1 & z we %all see lat] on ! k ( ?is fact1 :5 realiz$ 9 its prop] ord]1 is ! basis ( ! legitimate control ( m9d ov] matt]4 ,b a _w 9 :i* e individual possess$ ! p[] ( concret+ or flux+ matt] at 8 own sweet w irrespective ( any univ]sal coord9at+ pr9ciple is altoge!r inconceivable--! conflict ( wills w\ld prev5t su* a _w rema9+ 9 exi/5ce4 ,on ! o!r h&1 if we conceive ( a numb] ( individuals ea* possess+ ?is p[] & all employ+ x on ! l9es ( a common cosmic unity1 !n ! result w\ld be precisely ! same /able condition ( matt] ) :i* we are famili>--?is w\ld be a necessity ( fact = ! masses :o did n possess ?is p[]1 & a necessity ( pr9ciple = ! few :o did4 ,s "u ^! circum/ances ! same /able conditions ( ,nature w\ld prevail z at pres5t1 v>i$ only :5 ! initiat$ ones p]ceiv$ t ! ord] ( evolution w\ld be fur!r$1 & n h9d]$1 by call+ into action ! high] laws4 ,su* occasions w\ld be ( r>e occurr5ce1 & !n ! dep>ture f ! ord9>y law w\ld be reg>d$ by ! multitude z a miracle4 ,also we may be q sure t no "o :o _h atta9$ ?is k 9 ! legitimate ord] w\ld ev] p]=m a miracle = 8 own p]sonal aggr&izem5t or = ! purpose ( m]ely a/oni%+ ! behold]s--to d s w\ld be contr>y to ! fir/ pr9ciple ( ! high] tea*+ :i* is t ( pr(\nd rev]5ce = ! ,unity ( ! ,all-orig9at+ ,pr9ciple4 ,! conception1 !re=e1 ( su* a p[] ov] matt] be+ possess$ by c]ta9 individuals is 9 no way oppos$ to our ord9>y recognition ( concrete matt]1 & s we ne$ n at pres5t tr\ble ourselves to consid] ^! exceptions4 ,ano!r !ory is t matt] has no exi/5ce at all b is m]ely an illusion project$ by our own m9ds4 ,if s1 !n h[ is x t we all project id5tically simil> images8 ,on ! supposition t ea* m9d is indep5d5tly project+ its own conception ( matt] a lady :o goes to be fitt$ might be se5 by h] dressmak] z a c[4 ,g5]ations ( p h se5 ! ,great ,pyramid on ! same spot2 b on ! supposition t ea* individual is project+ 8 own mat]ial _w 9 entire indep5d5ce ( all o!r individuals !re is no reason :y any two p]sons %\ld ev] see ! same ?+ 9 ! same place4 ,on ! supposition ( su* an indep5d5t action by ea* sep>ate m9d1 )\t any common factor b9d+ !m all to "o p>ticul> mode ( recognition1 no int]c\rse betwe5 individuals w\ld be possible--!n1 )\t ! consci\sness ( relation to o!r individuals ! consci\sness ( our own individuality w\ld be lo/1 & s we %\ld cease to h any consci\s exi/5ce at all4 ,if on ! o!r h& we grant t !re is1 above ! individual m9ds1 a great ,cosmic ,m9d :i* imposes ^u !m ! necessity ( all see+ ! same image ( ,matt]1 !n t image is n a projection ( ! individual m9ds b ( ! ,cosmic ,m9d2 & s9ce ! individual m9ds are !mselves simil> projections ( ! ,cosmic ,m9d1 matt] is = !m j z mu* a reality z _! own exi/5ce4 ,i d\bt n t mat]ial sub/ance is ?us project$ by ! all-embrac+ ,div9e ,m9d2 b s also are our own m9ds project$ by x1 & !re=e ! relation betwe5 !m & matt] is a real relation & n a m]ely fictiti\s "o4 ,i p>ticul>ly wi% ! /ud5t to be cle> on ?is po9t1 t :]e two factors are project$ f a common s\rce _! relation to ea* o!r becomes an absolute fact 9 respect ( ! factors !mselves1 not)/&+ t ! p[] ( *ang+ t relation by sub/itut+ a diff]5t projection mu/ necess>ily always cont9ue to reside 9 ! orig9at+ s\rce4 ,to take a simple ari?metical example--by my p[] ( m5tal projection work+ ?r\gh my eyes & f+]s ,i write #d ,x #b4 ,"h ,i h e/abli%$ a c]ta9 num]ical relation :i* c only produce eight z its result4 ,aga91 ,i h p[] to *ange ! factors & write #d ,x #c1 9 :i* case #ab is ! only possible result1 & s on4 ,work+ 9 ?is way calculation becomes possible4 ,b if e "t ,i wrote #d t figure possess$ an indep5d5t p[] ( sett+ d[n a diff]5t numb] by :i* to multiply itself1 :at w\ld be ! result8 ,! fir/ #d ,i wrote might set d[n #c z its multipli]1 & ! next might set d[n #g1 & s on4 ,or if ,i want to make a box ( a c]ta9 size & cut l5g?s ( plank accord+ly1 if ea* l5g? c\ld caprici\sly *ange its wid? at a mom5t's notice1 h[ c\ld ,i ev] make ! box8 ,i myself may *ange ! %ape & size ( my box by e/abli%+ new relations betwe5 ! bits ( wood1 b = ! pieces ( wood !mselves ! proportions det]m9$ by my m9d mu/ rema9 fix$ quantities1 o!rwise no con/ruction c\ld take place4 ,?is is a v r\gh analogy1 b x may be suffici5t to %[ t = a cosmos to exi/ at all x is absolutely necess>y t !re %\ld be a ,cosmic ,m9d b9d+ all individual m9ds to c]ta9 g5]ic unities ( action1 & s produc+ all ?+s z realities & no?+ z illusion4 ,! importance ( ?is conclusion w become m app>5t z we advance 9 our /udies4 ,we h n[ got at "s reason :y concrete mat]ial =m is a necessity ( ! ,creative ,process4 ,)\t x ! p]fect ,self-recognition ( ,_s f ! ,individual /&po9t1 :i* we %all pres5tly f9d is ! means by :i* ! ,creative ,process is to be c>ri$ =w>d1 w\ld be impossible2 & !re=e1 s f> f matt] be+ an illusion1 x is ! necess>y *annel = ! self-diff]5tiation ( ,_s & its ,expression 9 multitud9\s life & beauty4 ,matt] is ?us ! necess>y ,pol> ,opposite to ,_s1 & :5 we ?us recognize x 9 its "r ord] we %all f9d t !re is no antagonism betwe5 ! two1 b t toge!r !y con/itute "o h>moni\s :ole4 ,,*apt] ,,ii ,,! ,,self-,,contemplation ,,( ,,_s ,if we ask h[ ! cosmos came into exi/5ce we %all f9d t ultimately we c only attribute x to ! ,self-,contemplation ( ,_s4 ,let u />t ) ! facts n[ kn[n to mod]n physical sci5ce4 ,all mat]ial ?+s1 includ+ our own bodies1 are compos$ ( comb9ations ( diff]5t *emical elem5ts su* z c>bon1 oxyg51 nitrog51 c4 ,*emi/ry recognizes 9 all ab\t sev5ty ( ^! elem5ts ea* ) its peculi> aff9ities2 b ! m advanc$ physical sci5ce ( ! pres5t day f9ds t !y are all compos$ ( "o & ! same ultimate sub/ance to :i* ! "n ( ,e!r has be5 giv51 & t ! diff]5ce betwe5 an atom ( iron & an atom ( oxyg5 results only f ! diff]5ce 9 ! numb] ( e!ric p>ticles ( :i* ea* is compos$ & ! rate ( _! motion )9 ! sph]e ( ! atom1 ?us curi\sly com+ back to ! dictum ( ,py?agoras t ! univ]se has its orig9 9 ,numb] & ,motion4 ,we may !re=e say t our entire sol> sy/em toge!r ) e sort ( mat]ial sub/ance :i* x conta9s is made up ( no?+ b ?is "o prim>y sub/ance 9 v>i\s degrees ( cond5sation4 ,n[ ! next /ep is to realize t ?is e!r is ev]y:]e4 ,?is is %[n by ! undulatory !ory ( light4 ,light is n a sub/ance b is ! effect produc$ on ! eye by ! imp++ ( ! ripples ( ! e!r ^u ! ret9a4 ,^! waves are excessively m9ute1 rang+ 9 l5g? f #a-ci1jjj? ( an in* at ! r$ end ( ! spectrum to #a-eg1jjj? at ! violet end4 ,next rememb] t ^! waves are n compos$ ( advanc+ p>ticles ( ! m$ium b pass onw>ds by ! pu% :i* ea* p>ticle 9 ! l9e ( motion gives to ! p>ticle next to x1 & !n y w see t if !re 7 a break ( "o fifty-?\s&? "p ( an in* 9 ! connect+ e!r betwe5 our eye & any s\rce ( light we c\ld n receive light f t s\rce1 = !re w\ld be no?+ to cont9ue ! wave-motion across ! gap4 ,consequ5tly z soon z we see light f any s\rce h[ev] di/ant1 we "k t !re mu/ be a cont9u\s body ( e!r betwe5 u & x4 ,n[ a/ronomy %[s u t we receive light f heav5ly bodies s di/ant t1 ?\gh x travels ) ! incr$ible spe$ ( #ahf1jjj miles p] second1 x takes m ?an two ?\s& ye>s to rea* u f "s ( !m2 & z su* />s are 9 all qu>t]s ( ! heav5s we c only come to ! conclusion t ! prim>y sub/ance or e!r mu/ be univ]sally pres5t4 ,?is means t ! raw mat]ial = ! =mation ( sol> sy/ems is univ]sally di/ribut$ ?r\gh\t space2 yet ?\gh we f9d t millions ( suns /ud ! heav5s1 we also f9d va/ int]/ell> spaces :i* %[ no sign ( cosmic activity4 ,!n some?+ has be5 at "w to />t cosmic activity 9 c]ta9 areas :ile pass+ ov] o!rs 9 :i* ! raw mat]ial is equally available4 ,:at is ?is some?+8 ,at fir/ we might be incl9$ to attribute ! developm5t ( cosmic en]gy to ! e!ric p>ticles !mselves1 b a little consid]ation w %[ u t ?is is ma!matically impossible 9 a m$ium :i* is equally di/ribut$ ?r\gh\t space1 = all its p>ticles are 9 equilibrium & s no "o p>ticle possesses p] se a great] p[] ( orig9at+ motion ?an any o!r4 ,consequ5tly ! initial movem5t mu/ be />t$ by some?+ :i*1 ?\gh x works on & ?r\gh ! p>ticles ( ! prim>y sub/ance1 is n ^? p>ticles !mselves4 ,x is ?is ,some?+ :i* we mean :5 we speak ( ,_s4 ,!n s9ce ,_s />ts ! cond5sation ( ! prim>y sub/ance into concrete aggregation1 & also does ?is 9 c]ta9 areas to ! exclusion ( o!rs1 we _c avoid attribut+ to ,_s ! p[] ( ,selection & ( tak+ an ,initiative on its own acc\nt4 ,"h1 !n1 we f9d ! initial ,pol>ity ( ,univ]sal ,_s & ,univ]sal ,sub/ance1 ea* be+ ! complem5t>y ( ! o!r1 & out ( ?is relation all subsequ5t evolution proce$s4 ,be+ complem5t>y means t ea* supplies :at is want+ 9 ! o!r1 & t ! two toge!r ?us make complete :ol5ess4 ,n[ ?is is j ! case "h4 ,_s supplies ,selection & ,motion4 ,sub/ance supplies some?+ f :i* selection c be made & to :i* ,motion c be imp>t$2 s t x is a s9e qua non = ! ,expression ( ,_s4 ,!n comes ! "q1 ,h[ did ! ,univ]sal ,sub/ance get !re8 ,x _c h made itself1 = its only quality is in]tia1 !re=e x mu/ h come f "s s\rce hav+ p[] to project x by "s mode ( action n ( a mat]ial nature4 ,n[ ! only mode ( action n ( a mat]ial nature is ,?\ght1 & !re=e to ,?\ght we mu/ look = ! orig9 ( ,sub/ance4 ,?is places u at a po9t antec$5t to ! exi/5ce ev5 ( prim>y sub/ance1 & consequ5tly ! initial action mu/ be t ( ! ,orig9at+ ,m9d ^u ,itself1 9 o!r words1 ,self-contemplation4 ,at ?is primordial /age nei!r ,"t nor ,space c be recogniz$1 = bo? imply measurem5t ( successive int]vals1 & 9 ! prim>y movem5t ( ,m9d ^u itself ! only consci\sness mu/ be t ( ,pres5t ,absolute ,be+1 because no ext]nal po9ts exi/ f :i* to measure ext5sion ei!r 9 "t or space4 ,h5ce we mu/ elim9ate ! ideas ( "t & space f our conception ( ,_s's initial ,self-contemplation4 ,?is be+ s1 ,_s's prim>y contemplation ( itself z simply ,be+ necess>ily makes its pres5ce univ]sal & et]nal1 & consequ5tly1 p>adoxical z x may seem1 its indep5d5ce ( ,"t & ,space makes x pres5t ?r\gh\t all ,"t & ,space4 ,x is ! old esot]ic maxim t ! po9t exp&s to inf9itude & t inf9itude is conc5trat$ 9 ! po9t4 ,we />t1 !n1 ) ,_s contemplat+ itself simply z ,be+4 ,b to realize y\r be+ y mu/ h consci\sness1 & consci\sness c only come by ! recognition ( y\r relation to some?+ else4 ,! some?+ else may be an ext]nal fact or a m5tal image2 b ev5 9 ! latt] case to conceive ! image at all y mu/ m5tally /& back f x & look at x--some?+ l ! man :o 0 run 9 by ! police at ,graves5d = walk+ beh9d himself to see h[ 8 new coat fitt$4 ,x /&s ?us3 if y are n consci\s ( some?+ y are consci\s ( no?+1 & if y are consci\s ( no?+1 !n y are unconsci\s1 s t to be consci\s at all y mu/ h some?+ to be consci\s (4 ,?is may seem l an extract f ,paddy's ,philosophy1 b x makes x cle> t consci\sness c only be atta9$ by ! recognition ( some?+ :i* is n ! recogniz+ ego itself--9 o!r words consci\sness is ! realization ( "s p>ticul> sort ( relation betwe5 ! cogniz+ subject & ! cogniz$ object2 b ,i want to get away f academical t]ms into ! spee* ( human be+s1 s let u take ! illu/ration ( a broom & its h&le--! two toge!r make a broom2 t is "o sort ( relation2 b take ! same /ick & put a rake-iron at ! end ( x & y h an altoge!r diff]5t implem5t4 ,! /ick rema9s ! same1 b ! diff]5ce ( :at is put at ! end ( x makes ! :ole ?+ a broom or a rake4 ,n[ ! ?9k+ & feel+ p[] is ! /ick1 & ! conception :i* x =ms is ! ?+ at ! end ( ! /ick1 s t ! quality ( its consci\sness w be det]m9$ by ! ideas :i* x projects2 b to be consci\s at all x mu/ project ideas ( "s sort4 ,n[ ( "o ?+ we may be q sure1 t ! ,_s ( ,life mu/ feel alive4 ,!n to feel alive x mu/ be consci\s1 & to be consci\s x mu/ h some?+ to be consci\s (2 !re=e ! contemplation ( itself z /&+ relat$ to some?+ :i* is n its own orig9at+ self 9 propria p]sona is a necessity ( ! case2 & consequ5tly ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s c only proce$ by its view+ itself z relat$ to some?+ /&+ out f itself1 j z we mu/ /& at a prop] di/ance to see a picture--9 fact ! v ^w exi/5ce means /&+ out4 ,?us ?+s are call$ into exi/5ce or out/&+ness by a p[] :i* itself does n /& out1 & ^: pres5ce is !re=e indicat$ by ! ^w subsi/5ce4 ,! next ?+ is t s9ce 9 ! beg9n+ !re is no?+ except ,_s1 its prim>y feel+ ( aliv5ess mu/ be t ( be+ alive all ov]2 & to e/abli% su* a consci\sness ( its own univ]sal liv+ness !re mu/ be ! recognition ( a correspond+ relation equally ext5sive 9 "*2 & ! only possible correspond5ce to fulfil ?is condition is !re=e t ( a univ]sally di/ribut$ & pla/ic m$ium ^: p>ticles are all 9 p]fect equilibrium1 :i* is exactly ! description ( ! ,prim>y ,sub/ance or e!r4 ,we are ?us philosophically l$ to ! conclusion t ,univ]sal ,sub/ance mu/ be project$ by ,univ]sal ,_s z a necess>y consequ5ce ( ,_s's own inh]5t feel+ ( ,aliv5ess2 & 9 ?is way we f9d t ! great ,prim>y ,pol>ity ( ,be+ becomes e/abli%$4 ,f ?is po9t onw>d we %all f9d ! pr9ciple ( ,pol>ity 9 univ]sal activity4 ,x is t relation betwe5 opposites )\t :i* no ext]nal ,motion w\ld be possible1 because !re w\ld be n[h]e to move f1 & n[h]e to move to2 & )\t :i* ext]nal ,=m w\ld be impossible because !re w\ld be no?+ to limit ! diffusion ( sub/ance & br+ x into %ape4 ,pol>ity1 or ! int]action ( ,active & ,passive1 is !re=e ! basis ( all ,evolution4 ,?is is a great fundam5tal tru? :5 we get x 9 its "r ord]2 b all ?r\gh ! ages x has be5 a prolific s\rce ( error by gett+ x 9 its wrong ord]4 ,& ! wrong ord] consi/s 9 mak+ ,pol>ity ! orig9at+ po9t ( ! ,creative ,process4 ,:at ?is misconception leads to we %all see lat] on2 b s9ce x is v widely accept$ "u v>i\s guises ev5 at ! pres5t day x is well to be on our gu>d aga9/ x4 ,!re=e ,i wi% ! /ud5t to see cle>ly t !re is some?+ :i* comes be=e t ,pol>ity :i* gives rise to ,evolution1 & t ?is some?+ is ! orig9al movem5t ( ,_s )9 itself1 ( :i* we c be/ get an idea by call+ x ,self-contemplation4 ,n[ ?is may seem an extremely ab/ract conception & "o ) :i* we h no practical conc]n4 ,i fancy ,i c he> ! read] say+ ,! ,"l only kn[s h[ ! _w />t$1 & x is ,8 bus9ess & n m9e1 :i* w\ld be p]fectly true if ?is orig9at+ faculty 7 conf9$ to ! ,cosmic ,m9d4 ,b x is n1 & ! same action takes place 9 our own m9ds also1 only ) ! diff]5ce t x is ultimately subject to t pr9ciple ( ,cosmic ,unity ( :i* ,i h already spok54 ,b1 subject to t unify+ pr9ciple1 ?is same p[] ( orig9ation is 9 ourselves also1 & our p]sonal advance 9 evolution dep5ds on our "r use ( x2 & our use ( x dep5ds on our recognition t we ourselves give rise to ! p>ticul> pol>ities :i* express !mselves 9 our :ole _w ( consci\sness1 :e!r )9 or )\t4 ,= ^! reasons x is v important to realize t ,evolution is n ! same z ,creation4 ,x is ! unfold+ ( pot5tialities involv$ 9 ?+s already creat$1 b n ! call+ into exi/5ce ( :at does n yet exi/--t is ,creation4 ,! ord]1 !re=e1 :i* ,i wi% ! /ud5t to obs]ve is1 fir/ ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s produc+ ,pol>ity1 & next ,pol>ity produc+ ,manife/ation 9 ,=m--& also to realize t x is 9 ?is ord] 8 own m9d op]ates z a subord9ate c5t] ( creative en]gy4 ,:5 ! true place ( ,pol>ity is ?us recogniz$1 we %all f9d 9 x ! explanation ( all ^? relations ( ?+s :i* give rise to ! :ole _w ( ph5om5a2 f :i* we may draw ! practical inf]5ce t if we want to *ange ! manife/ation we mu/ *ange ! pol>ity1 & to *ange ! pol>ity we mu/ get back to ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s4 ,b 9 its prop] place z ! root-pr9ciple ( all second>y causation1 ,pol>ity is "o ( ^? fundam5tal facts ( :i* we mu/ nev] lose sight4 ,! t]m ,pol>ity is adopt$ f electrical sci5ce4 ,9 ! electric batt]y x is ! connect+ toge!r ( ! opposite poles ( z9c & copp] t causes a curr5t to fl[ f "o to ! o!r & s provides ! en]gy t r+s ! bell4 ,if ! connection is brok5 !re is no action4 ,:5 y press ! button y make ! connection4 ,! same process is repeat$ 9 respect ( e sort ( pol>ity ?r\gh\t ! univ]se4 ,circulation dep5ds on pol>ity1 & circulation is ! manife/ation ( ,life1 :i* we may !re=e say dep5ds on ! pr9ciple ( pol>ity4 ,9 relation to ourselves we are conc]n$ ) two great pol>ities1 ! pol>ity ( ,s\l & ,body & ! pol>ity ( ,s\l & ,_s2 & x is 9 ord] t he may m cle>ly realize _! work+ t ,i want ! /ud5t to h "s prelim9>y idea ( ,pol>ity z a g5]al pr9ciple4 ,! conception ( ! ,creative ,ord] may !re=e be g5]aliz$ z foll[s4 ,! ,_s wants to enjoy ! reality ( its own ,life--n m]ely to vegetate1 b to enjoy giv+--& !re=e by ,self-contemplation x projects a pol> opposite1 or complem5t>y1 calculat$ to give rise to ! p>ticul> sort ( relation out ( :i* ! enjoym5t ( a c]ta9 mode ( self-consci\sness w necess>ily spr+4 ,let ?is s5t5ce be well pond]$ ov] until ! full ext5t ( its significance is grasp$1 = x is ! key to ! :ole matt] ,v well1 !n3 ,_s wants to ,enjoy ,life1 & s1 by ?9k+ ( itself z hav+ ! enjoym5t :i* x wi%es1 x produces ! conditions :i*1 by _! re-action ^u itself1 give rise to ! reality ( ! sort ( enjoym5t contemplat$4 ,9 m sci5tific language an opposite pol>ity is induc$1 giv+ rise to a curr5t :i* /imulates a p>ticul> mode ( s5sation1 :i* s5sation 9 turn becomes a fre% />t+-po9t = /ill fur!r action2 & 9 ?is way ea* successive /age becomes ! /epp+-/one to a /ill high] degree ( s5sation--t is1 to a ,full] ,enjoym5t ( ,life4 ,su* a conception z ?is pres5ts u ) a ,progressive ,s]ies to :i* x is impossible to assign any limit4 ,t ! progression mu/ be limitless is cle> f ! fact t !re is nev] any *ange 9 ! me?od4 ,at ea* successive /age ! ,creat+ ,p[] is ! ,self-consci\sness ( ! ,_s1 z realiz$ at t /age1 /ill rea*+ =w>d = yet fur!r ,enjoym5t ( ,life1 & s always keep+ on repeat+ ! "o ,creative ,process at an ev]-ris+ level2 & s9ce ^! are ! sole work+ conditions1 ! progress is "o :i* logically admits ( no f9ality4 ,& ?is is :]e ! importance ( realiz+ ! ,s+l5ess ( ! ,orig9at+ ,p[] comes 91 = ) a ,duality ea* memb] w\ld limit ! o!r2 9 fact1 ,duality z ! ,orig9at+ ,p[] is inconceivable1 =1 once m to quote ,paddy's ,philosophy1 f9ality w\ld be rea*$ be=e any?+ 0 begun4 ,?is ,creative ,process1 !re=e1 c only be conceiv$ ( z limitless1 :ile at ! same "t /rictly progressive1 t is1 proce$+ /age by /age1 ea* /age be+ necess>y z a prep>ation = ! "o t is to foll[4 ,let u !n briefly sket* ! /ages by :i* ?+s 9 our _w h got z f> z !y h4 ,! int]e/ ( ! enquiry lies 9 ! fact t if we c once get at ! pr9ciple :i* is produc+ ^! results1 we may discov] "s way ( giv+ x p]sonal application4 ,on ! hypo!sis ( ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s be+ ! orig9at+ p[]1 we h f\nd t a prim>y e!r1 or univ]sal sub/ance1 is ! necess>y correspond5ce to ,_s's simple aw>5ess ( its own be+4 ,b ?\gh aw>5ess ( be+ is ! necess>y f\ndation = any fur!r possibilities x is1 s to say1 n mu* to talk ab\t4 ,! f\ndation fact1 ( c\rse1 is to "k t ,i ,am2 b imm$iately on ?is consci\sness !re foll[s ! desire = ,activity--,i want to enjoy my ,i ,am-ness by do+ some?+ ) x4 ,translat+ ^! words into a /ate ( consci\sness 9 ! ,cosmic ,m9d !y become a ,law ( ,t5d5cy lead+ to localis$ activity1 &1 look+ only at our own _w1 ?is w\ld mean ! cond5sation ( ! univ]sal e!ric sub/ance into ! prim>y nebula :i* lat] on becomes our sol> sy/em1 ?is be+ ! correspond5ce to ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s z pass+ into specific activity in/ead ( rema9+ absorb$ 9 simple aw>5ess ( ,be+4 ,!n ?is self-recognition w\ld lead to ! conception ( /ill m specific activity hav+ its appropriate pol> opposite1 or mat]ial correspond5ce1 9 ! cond5sation ( ! nebula into a sol> sy/em4 ,n[ at ?is /age ,_s's conception ( itself is t ( ,activity1 & consequ5tly ! mat]ial correspond5ce is ,motion1 z di/+ui%$ f ! simple diffus$ e!r :i* is ! correspond5ce ( m]e aw>5ess ( ,be+1 ,b :at sort ( motion8 ,is ! mat]ial movem5t evolv$ at ?is /age b\nd to take any p>ticul> =m8 ,a little consid]ation w %[ u t x is4 ,at ?is initial /age1 ! fir/ awak5+1 s to say1 ( ,_s into activity1 its consci\sness c only be t ( activity absolute2 t is1 n z relat$ to any o!r mode ( activity because z yet !re is none1 b only z relat$ to an all-embrac+ ,be+2 s t ! only possible conception ( ,activity at ?is /age is t ( ,self-su/a9$ activity1 n dep5d+ on any prec$+ mode ( activity because !re is none4 ,! law ( reciprocity !re=e dem&s a simil> self-su/a9$ motion 9 ! mat]ial correspond5ce1 & ma!matical consid]ations %[ t ! only sort ( motion :i* c su/a9 a self-support+ body mov+ 9 vacuo is a rot>y motion br++ ! body itself into a sph]ical =m4 ,n[ ?is is exactly :at we f9d at bo? extremes ( ! mat]ial _w4 ,at ! big end ! sph]es ( ! planets rotat+ on _! axes & revolv+ r\nd ! sun2 & at ! little end ! sph]es ( ! atoms consi/+ ( p>ticles :i*1 mod]n sci5ce tells u1 9 l mann] rotate r\nd a common c5t] at di/ances :i* are a/ronomical z comp>$ ) _! own mass4 ,?us ! two ultimate units ( physical manife/ation1 ! atom & ! planet1 bo? foll[ ! same law ( self-su/a9$ motion :i* we h f\nd t1 on a priori gr\nds1 !y ought 9 ord] to express ! prim>y activity ( ,_s4 ,& we may note 9 pass+ t ?is rot>y1 or absolute1 motion is ! comb9ation ( ! only two possible relative modes ( motion1 namely1 motion f a po9t & motion to x1 t is to say c5trifugal & c5tripetal motion2 s t 9 rot>y1 or absolute1 motion we f9d t bo? ! pol>ities ( motion are includ$1 ?us repeat+ on ! purely me*anical side ! primordial pr9ciple ( ! ,unity includ+ ! ,duality 9 itself4 ,b ! ,_s wants some?+ m ?an me*anical motion1 some?+ m alive ?an ! prelim9>y ,rota1 & s ! fir/ /ep t[>d individualiz$ consci\sness meets u 9 plant life4 ,!n on ! pr9ciple t ea* successive /age af=ds ! plat=m = a fur!r outlook1 plant life is foll[$ by animal life1 & ?is by ! ,human ord] 9 :i* ! lib]ty ( select+ its own conditions is imm5sely ext5d$4 ,9 ?is way ! ,_s's expression ( itself has n[ rea*$ ! po9t :]e its pol> complem5t>y1 or ,reciprocal1 manife/s z ,intellectual ,man--?us con/itut+ ! ,f\r? great /age ( ,_s's ,self-recognition4 ,b ! ,creative ,process _c /op "h1 =1 z we h se51 its root 9 ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s r5d]s x ( necessity an ,inf9ite ,progression4 ,s x is no use ask+ :at is its ultimate1 = x has no ultimate--its ^w is ,excelsior--ev] ,life & ,life m ,abundant4 ,!re=e ! "q is n z to f9ality :]e !re is none1 b z to ! next /ep 9 ! progression4 ,f\r k+doms we "k3 :at is to be ! ,fif?8 ,all along ! l9e ! progress has be5 9 "o direction1 namely1 t[>d ! developm5t ( m p]fect ,individuality1 & !re=e on ! pr9ciple ( cont9uity we may reasonably inf] t ! next /age w take u /ill fur!r 9 ! same direction4 ,we want some?+ m p]fect ?an we h yet rea*$1 b our ideas z to :at x %\ld be are v v>i\s1 n to say discordant1 = "o p]son's idea ( bett] is ano!r p]son's idea ( worse4 ,!re=e :at we want to get at is "s broad g5]alization ( pr9ciple :i* w be 9 advance ( our pa/ exp]i5ces4 ,?is means t we mu/ look = ?is pr9ciple 9 some?+ t we h n yet exp]i5c$1 & ! only place :]e we c possibly f9d pr9ciples :i* h n yet manife/$ !mselves is 9 gremio ,dei--t is1 9 ! inn]mo/ ( ! ,orig9at+ ,_s1 or z ,/4 ,john calls x1 9 ! bosom ( ! ,fa!r4 ,s we are logically br\ght to p]sonal p>ticipation 9 ! ,div9e ,ideal z ! only pr9ciple by :i* ! advance into ! next /age c possibly be made4 ,!re=e we arrive at ! "q1 ,:at is ! ,div9e ,ideal l8 ,,*apt] ,,iii ,,! ,,div9e ,,ideal ,:at is ! ,div9e ,ideal8 ,at fir/ x might appe> hopeless to attempt to answ] su* a "q1 b by adh]+ to a def9ite pr9ciple we %all f9d t x w op5 out1 & lead u on1 & %[ u ?+s :i* we c\ld n o!rwise h se5--?is is ! nature ( pr9ciple1 & is :at di/+ui%es x f m]e rules :i* are only ! application ( pr9ciple "u "s p>ticul> set ( conditions4 ,we f\nd two pr9ciples z ess5tial 9 our conception ( ! ,orig9at+ ,_s1 namely its p[] ( ,selection & its p[] ( ,initiative2 & we f\nd a ?ird pr9ciple z its only possible ,motive1 namely ! ,desire ( ! ,,liv+ = ev] increas+ ,enjoym5t ( ,life4 ,n[ ) ^! ?ree pr9ciples z ! v ess5ce ( ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s to guide u1 we %all1 ,i ?9k1 be able to =m "s conception ( t ,div9e ,ideal :i* gives rise to ! ,fif? ,/age ( ,manife/ation ( ,_s1 ^u :i* we %\ld n[ be prep>+ to ent]4 ,we h se5 t ! ,_s's ,enjoym5t ( ,life is necess>ily a reciprocal--x mu/ h a correspond+ fact 9 manife/ation to answ] to x2 o!rwise by ! inh]5t law ( m9d no consci\sness1 & consequ5tly no enjoym5t1 c\ld accrue2 & !re=e by ! law ( cont9u\s progression ! requir$ ,reciprocal %\ld manife/ z a be+ awak5+ to ! consci\sness ( ! pr9ciple by :i* he himself comes into exi/5ce4 ,su* an awak5+ _c proce$ f a comp>ison ( "o set ( exi/+ conditions ) ano!r1 b only f ! recognition ( a ,p[] :i* is indep5d5t ( all conditions1 t is to say1 ! absolute ,self-dep5d5ce ( ! ,_s4 ,a be+ ?us awak5$ w\ld be ! prop] correspond5ce ( ! ,_s's ,enjoym5t ( ,life at a /age n only above me*anical motion or physical vitality1 b ev5 above intellectual p]ception ( exi/+ ph5om5a1 t is to say at ! /age :]e ! ,_s's ,enjoym5t consi/s 9 recogniz+ itself z ! ,s\rce ( all ?+s4 ,! position 9 ! ,absolute w\ld be1 s to speak1 ! awak5+ ( ,_s to ! recognition ( its own ,arti/ic ,ability4 ,i use ! ^w ,arti/ic z m ne>ly express+ an almo/ un/atable idea ?an any o!r ,i c ?9k (1 = ! "w ( ! arti/ approa*es m closely to creation ex nihilo ?an any o!r =m ( human activity4 ,! "w ( ! arti/ is ! expression ( ! self t ! arti/ is1 :ile t ( ! sci5ti/ is ! comp>ison ( facts :i* exi/ indep5d5tly ( 8 own p]sonality4 ,x is true t ! realm ( ,art is n )\t its me?ods ( analysis1 b ! analysis is t ( ! arti/'s own feel+ & ( ! causes :i* give rise to x4 ,^! are f\nd to conta9 9 !mselves c]ta9 pr9ciples :i* are fundam5tal to all ,art1 b ^! pr9ciples are ! laws ( ! creative action ( m9d r ?an ^? ( ! limitations ( matt]4 ,n[ if we may transf] ?is famili> analogy to our conception ( ! work+ ( ! ,all-,orig9at+ ,m9d we may picture x z ! ,great ,arti/ giv+ visible expression to ,8 feel+ by a process :i*1 ?\gh subject to no re/riction f antec$5t conditions1 yet works by a ,law :i* is insep>able f ! ,feel+ itself--9 fact ! ,law is ! ,feel+1 & ! ,feel+ is ! ,law1 ! ,law ( ,p]fect ,creativ5ess4 ,"s su* ,self-contemplation z ?is is ! only way 9 :i* we c conceive ! next1 or ,fif?1 /age ( ,_s's ,self-recognition z tak+ place4 ,hav+ got z f> z x has 9 ! f\r previ\s /ages1 t is to ! production ( intellectual man z its correspond5ce1 ! next /ep 9 advance mu/ be on ! l9es ,i h indicat$--unless1 inde$1 !re 7 a sudd5 & arbitr>y break+ ( ! ,law ( ,cont9uity1 a supposition :i* ! :ole ,creative ,process up to n[ =bids u to ent]ta94 ,!re=e we may picture ! ,fif? /age ( ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s z its awak5+ to ! recognition ( its own ,arti/ic ,ability1 its own absolute fre$om ( action & creative p[]--j z 9 /udio p>lance we say t an arti/ becomes free ( 8 palette4 ,b by ! always pres5t ,law ( ,reciprocity1 ?r\gh :i* alone self-consci\sness c be atta9$1 ?is ,self-recognition ( ,_s 9 ! ,absolute implies a correspond+ objective fact 9 ! _w ( ! ,relative2 t is to say1 ! com+ into manife/ation ( a be+ capable ( realiz+ ! ,free ,creative ,arti/ry ( ! ,_s1 & ( recogniz+ ! same pr9ciple 9 himself1 :ile at ! same "t realiz+ also ! relation betwe5 ! ,univ]sal ,manife/+ ,pr9ciple & its ,individual ,manife/ation4 ,su*1 x appe>s to me1 mu/ be ! conception ( ! ,div9e ,ideal embodi$ 9 ! ,fif? ,/age ( ! progress ( manife/ation4 ,b ,i w\ld draw p>ticul> att5tion to ! conclud+ words ( ! la/ p>agraph1 = if we miss ! relation betwe5 ! ,univ]sal ,manife/+ ,pr9ciple & its ,individual ,manife/ation1 we h fail$ to realize ! ,pr9ciple altoge!r1 :e!r 9 ! ,univ]sal or 9 ! ,individual--x is j _! int]action t makes ea* become :at x does become--& 9 ?is fur!r becom+ consi/s ! progression4 ,?is relation proce$s f ! pr9ciple ,i po9t$ out 9 ! op5+ *apt] :i* makes x necess>y = ! ,univ]sal ,_s to be always h>moni\s ) itself2 & if ?is ,unity is n recogniz$ by ! individual he _c hold t position ( ,reciprocity to ! ,orig9at+ ,_s :i* w enable x to recognize itself z 9 ! ,enjoym5t ( ,life at ! high] level we are n[ contemplat+--r ! feel+ convey$ w\ld be t ( some?+ antagoni/ic1 produc+ ! rev]se ( enjoym5t1 ?us philosophically br++ out ! po9t ( ! ,scriptural injunction1 ,grieve n ! ,_s4 ,also ! re-action ^u ! individual mu/ necess>ily give rise to a correspond+ /ate ( inh>mony1 ?\gh he may n be able to def9e 8 feel+ ( unre/ or to acc\nt = x4 ,b on ! o!r h& if ! gr& h>mony ( ! ,orig9at+ ,_s )9 itself is duly reg>d$1 !n ! individual m9d af=ds a fre% c5t] f :i* ! ,_s contemplates itself 9 :at ,i h v5tur$ to call its ,arti/ic ,orig9ality--a b\ndless pot5tial ( ,creativ5ess1 yet always regulat$ by its own inh]5t ,law ( ,unity4 ,& ?is ,law ( ! ,_s's ,orig9al ,unity is a v simple "o4 ,x is ! ,_s's necess>y & basic conception ( itself4 ,a lie is a /atem5t t some?+ is1 :i* is n4 ,!n1 s9ce ! ,_s's /atem5t or conception ( any?+ necess>ily makes t ?+ exi/1 x is logically impossible = x to conceive a lie4 ,!re=e ! ,_s is ,tru?4 ,simil>ly disease & dea? are ! negative ( ,life1 & !re=e ! ,_s1 z ! ,pr9ciple ( ,life1 _c embody disease or dea? 9 its ,self-contemplation4 ,9 l mann] also1 s9ce x is free to produce :at x w1 ! ,_s _c desire ! pres5ce ( repugnant =ms1 & s "o ( its inh]5t ,laws mu/ be ,beauty4 ,9 ?is ?reefold ,law ( ,tru?1 ,life1 & ,beauty1 we f9d ! :ole und]ly+ nature ( ! ,_s1 & no action on ! "p ( ! individual c be at v>iance ) ! ,orig9at+ ,unity :i* does n contrav]t ^! fundam5tal pr9ciples4 ,?is x w be se5 leaves ! individual absolutely unfett]$ except 9 ! direction ( break+ up ! fundam5tal h>mony on :i* he himself1 z includ$ 9 ! g5]al creation1 is dep5d5t4 ,?is c]ta9ly _c be call$ limitation1 & we are all free to foll[ ! l9es ( our own individuality 9 e o!r direction2 s t1 al?\gh ! recognition ( our relation to ! ,orig9at+ ,_s safegu>ds u f injur+ ourselves or o!rs1 x 9 no way re/ricts our lib]ty ( action or n>r[s our field ( developm5t4 ,am ,i1 !n1 try+ to base my action ^u a fundam5tal desire = ! op5+ out ( ,tru?1 = ! increas+ ( ,liv+ness1 & = ! creat+ ( ,beauty8 ,h ,i got ?is z an ev] pres5t ,law ( ,t5d5cy at ! back ( my ?\ght8 ,if s1 !n ?is law w occupy precisely ! same place 9 ,my ,microcosm1 or p]sonal _w1 t x does 9 ! ,macrocosm1 or great _w1 z a p[] :i* is 9 itself =mless1 b :i* by reason ( its pres5ce necess>ily impresses its "* ^u all t ! creative en]gy =ms4 ,on ?is basis ! creative en]gy ( ! ,univ]sal ,m9d may be safely tru/$ to "w ?r\gh ! specializ+ influ5ce ( our own ?\ght#a & we may adopt ! maxim tru/ y\r desires because we "k t !y are ! movem5t ( ! ,univ]sal 9 ourselves1 & t be+ bas$ ^u our fundam5tal recognition ( ! ,life1 ,love1 & ,beauty :i* ! ,_s is1 _! unfoldm5ts mu/ c>ry ^! initial qualities ) !m all d[n ! l9e1 & ?us1 9 h[ev] small a degree1 becomes a portion ( ! work+ ( ! ,_s 9 its inh]5t creativ5ess4 ,?is p]petual ,creativ5ess ( ! ,_s is :at we mu/ nev] lose sight (1 & t is :y ,i want ! /ud5t to grasp cle>ly ! idea ( ! ,_s's ,self-contemplation z ! only possible root ( ! ,creative ,process4 ,n only at ! fir/ creation ( ! _w1 b at all times ! plane ( ! inn]mo/ is t ( ,pure ,_s1#b & !re=e at ?is1 ! orig9at+ po9t1 !re is no?+ else = ,_s to contemplate except+ itself2 !n ?is ,self-contemplation produces correspond+ manife/ation1 & s9ce ,self-contemplation or recognition ( its own exi/5ce mu/ necess>ily g on cont9ually1 ! correspond+ creativ5ess mu/ always be at "w4 ,if ?is fundam5tal idea be cle>ly grasp$ we %all see t incessant & progressive creativ5ess is ! v ess5ce & be+ ( ,_s4 ,?is is :at is meant by ! ,affirmativ5ess ( ! ,_s4 ,x _c p] se act negatively1 t is to say uncreatively1 = by ! v nature ( its ,self-recognition su* a negative action w\ld be impossible4 ,( c\rse if we act negatively !n1 s9ce ! ,_s is always act+ affirmatively1 we are mov+ 9 ! opposite direction to x2 & consequ5tly s long z we reg>d our own negative action z be+ affirmative1 ! ,_s's action mu/ appe> to u negative1 & ?us x is t all ! negative conditions ( ! _w h _! root 9 negative or inv]t$ ?\ght3 b ! m we br+ our ?\ght into h>mony ) ! ,life1 ,love1 & ,beauty :i* ! ,_s is1 ! less ^! inv]t$ conditions w obta91 until at la/ !y w be elim9at$ altoge!r4 ,to accompli% ?is is our great object2 = ?\gh ! progress may be sl[ x w be /eady if we proce$ on a def9ite pr9ciple2 & to lay hold ( ! true pr9ciple is ! purpose ( our /udies4 ,& ! pr9ciple to lay hold ( is ! ,ceaseless ,creativ5ess ( ,_s4 ,?is is :at we mean :5 we speak ( x z ,! ,_s ( ! ,affirmative1 & ,i w\ld ask my read]s to impress ?is t]m ^u _! m9ds4 ,once grant t ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s is ?us ! ,_s ( ! ,pure ,affirmative1 & we %all f9d t ?is w lead u logically to results ( ! highe/ value4 ,if1 !n1 we keep ?is ,p]petual & ,progressive ,creativ5ess ( ! ,_s cont9ually 9 m9d we may rely ^u its work+ z surely 9 ourselves z 9 t great cosmic =w>d movem5t :i* we speak ( z ,evolution4 ,x is ! same p[] ( ,evolution work+ )9 ourselves1 only ) ?is diff]5ce1 t 9 proportion z we come to realize its nature we f9d ourselves able to facilitate its progress by (f]+ m & m favorable conditions = its work+4 ,we d n add to ! =ce ( ! ,p[]1 = we are products ( x & s _c g5]ate :at g5]ates u2 b by provid+ suitable conditions we c m & m highly specialize x4 ,?is is ! me?od ( all ! advance t has ev] be5 made4 ,we nev] create any =ce 7e4g4 electricity7 b we provide special conditions "u :i* ! =ce manife/s itself 9 a v>iety ( useful & beautiful ways1 unsuspect$ possibilities :i* lay hidd5 9 ! p[] until br\ght to light by ! coop]ation ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor4 ,n[ x is precisely ! introduction#c ( ?is ,p]sonal ,factor t conc]ns u1 because to all et]nity we c only recognize ?+s f our own c5t] ( consci\sness1 :e!r 9 ?is _w or 9 any o!r2 !re=e ! practical "q is h[ to specialize 9 our own case ! g5]ic ,orig9at+ ,life :i*1 :5 we give x a "n1 we call ! ,_s4 ,! me?od ( do+ ?is is p]fectly logical :5 we once see t ! pr9ciple involv$ is t ( ! ,self-recognition ( ,_s4 ,we h trac$ ! modus op]&i ( ! ,creative ,process suffici5tly f> to see t ! exi/5ce ( ! cosmos is ! result ( ! ,_s's see+ itself 9 ! cosmos1 & if ?is be ! law ( ! :ole x mu/ also be ! law ( ! "p4 ,b !re is ?is diff]5ce1 t s long z ! normal av]age relation ( p>ticles is ma9ta9$ ! :ole cont9ues to subsi/1 no matt] :at position any p>ticul> p>ticle may g into1 j z a f\nta9 cont9ues to exi/ no matt] :e!r any p>ticul> drop ( wat] is d[n 9 ! bas9 or at ! top ( ! jet4 ,?is is ! g5]ic action :i* keeps ! race go+ z a :ole4 ,b ! "q is1 ,:at is go+ to become ( ourselves8 ,!n because ! law ( ! :ole is also ! law ( ! "p we may at once say t :at is want$ is = ! ,_s to see itself 9 u--9 o!r words1 to f9d 9 u ! ,reciprocal :i*1 z we h se51 is necess>y to its ,enjoym5t ( a c]ta9 ,quality ( ,consci\sness4 ,n[1 ! fundam5tal consci\sness ( ! ,_s mu/ be t ( ,self-su/a9+ ,life1 & = ! full enjoym5t ( ?is consci\sness !re mu/ be a correspond+ individual consci\sness reciprocat+ x2 & on ! "p ( ! individual su* a consci\sness c only arise f ! recognition t 8 own life is id5tical ) t ( ! ,_s--n some?+ s5t =? to w&] away by itself1 b some?+ includ$ 9 & =m+ "p ( ! ,great] ,life4 ,!n by ! v conditions ( ! case1 su* a contemplation on ! "p ( ! individual is no?+ else ?an ! ,_s contemplat+ itself f ! /&po9t ( ! individual consci\sness1 & ?us fulfill+ ! ,law ( ! ,creative ,process "u su* specializ$ conditions z mu/ logically result 9 ! p]petuation ( ! individual life4 ,x is ! ,law ( ! ,cosmic ,creative ,process transf]r$ to ! individual4 ,?is1 x seems to me1 is ! ,div9e ,ideal3 t ( an ,individuality :i* recognizes its ,s\rce1 & recognizes also ! me?od by :i* x spr+s f t ,s\rce1 & :i* is !re=e able to op5 up 9 itself a *annel by :i* t ,s\rce c fl[ 9 un9t]rupt$ly2 ) ! result t f ! mom5t ( ?is recognition ! individual lives directly f ! ,orig9at+ ,life1 z be+ himself a special direct creation1 & n m]ely z be+ a memb] ( a g5]ic race4 ,! individual :o has rea*$ ?is /age ( recognition ?us f9ds a pr9ciple ( endur+ life )9 himself2 s !n ! next "q is 9 :at way ?is pr9ciple is likely to manife/ itself4 ,,*apt] ,,iv ,,! ,,manife/ation ,,( ,,! ,,life ,,pr9ciple ,we mu/ be> 9 m9d t :at we h n[ rea*$ is a pr9ciple1 or univ]sal pot5tial1 only we h locat$ x 9 ! individual4 ,b a pr9ciple1 z su*1 is n manife/ation4 ,manife/ation is ! gr[? proce$+ f ! pr9ciple1 t is to say1 "s ,=m 9 :i* ! pr9ciple becomes active4 ,at ! same "t we mu/ recollect t1 ?\gh a =m is necess>y = manife/ation1 ! =m is n ess5tial1 = ! same pr9ciple may manife/ ?r\gh v>i\s =ms1 j z electricity may "w ei!r ?r\gh a lamp or a tram-c> )\t 9 any way *ang+ its inh]5t nature4 ,9 ?is way we are br\ght to ! conclusion t ! ,life-pr9ciple mu/ always provide itself ) a body 9 :i* to function1 ?\gh x does n foll[ t ?is body mu/ always be ( ! same *emical con/itution z ! "o we n[ possess4 ,we might well imag9e "s di/ant planet :]e ! *emical comb9ations ) :i* we are famili> on e>? did n obta92 b if ! ess5tial life-pr9ciple ( any individual 7 transport$ ?i!r1 !n by ! ,law ( ! ,creative ,process x w\ld proce$ to clo! itself ) a mat]ial body drawn f ! atmosph]e & sub/ance ( t planet2 & ! p]sonality ?us produc$ w\ld be q at home !re1 = all 8 surr\nd+s w\ld be p]fectly natural to him1 h[ev] diff]5t ! laws ( ,nature might be !re f :at we "k "h4 ,9 su* a conception z ?is we f9d ! importance ( ! two lead+ pr9ciples to :i* ,i h drawn att5tion--fir/1 ! p[] ( ! ,_s to create ex nihilo1 & secondly1 ! individual's recognition ( ! basic pr9ciple ( ,unity giv+ p]man5ce & solidity to ! frame ( ,nature4 ,by ! =m] ! self-recogniz+ life-pr9ciple c\ld produce any sort ( body x *ose2 & by ! latt] x w\ld be l$ to project "o 9 h>mony ) ! natural ord] ( ! p>ticul> planet1 ?us mak+ all ! facts ( t ord] solid realities to ! individual1 & himself a solid & natural be+ to ! o!r inhabitants ( t _w4 ,b ?is w\ld n d away ) ! individual's k ( h[ he got !re2 & s1 suppos+ him to h realiz$ 8 id5tity ) ! ,univ]sal ,life-,pr9ciple suffici5tly to consci\sly control ! projection ( 8 own body1 he c\ld at w dis9tegrate ! body :i* accord$ ) ! conditions ( "o planet & con/itute "o :i* accord$ j z h>moni\sly ) ^? ( ano!r1 & c\ld ?us function on any numb] ( planets z a p]fectly natural be+ on ea* ( !m4 ,he w\ld 9 all respects resemble ! o!r inhabitants ) "o all-important exception1 t s9ce he _h atta9$ to unity ) 8 ,creative ,pr9ciple he w\ld n be ti$ by ! laws ( matt] z !y 74 ,any "o :o %\ld atta9 to su* a p[] c\ld only d s by 8 realization ( ! all-embrac+ ,unity ( ! ,_s z be+ ! ,f\ndation ( all ?+s2 & ?is be+ ! basis ( 8 own ext5d$ p[]s he w\ld be ! la/ to controv]t 8 own basic pr9ciple by employ+ 8 p[]s 9 su* a way z to di/urb ! natural c\rse ( evolution 9 ! _w :]e he 04 ,he might use !m to help =w>d ! evolution ( o!rs 9 t _w1 b c]ta9ly nev] to di/urb x1 = he w\ld always act on ! maxim t ,ord] is ,heav5's ,fir/ ,law4 ,our object1 h[ev]1 is n to transf] ourselves to o!r planets b to get ! be/ out ( ?is "o2 b we %all n get ! be/ out ( ?is "o until we realize t ! p[] :i* w enable u to d s is s absolutely univ]sal & fundam5tal t its application 9 ?is _w is precisely ! same z 9 any o!r1 & t is :y ,i h /at$ x z a g5]al proposition applicable to all worlds4 ,! pr9ciple be+ ?us univ]sal !re is no reason :y we %\ld po/pone its application till we f9d ourselves 9 ano!r _w1 & ! be/ place & "t to beg9 are ,"h & ,n[4 ,! />t+ po9t is n 9 "t or locality1 b 9 ! mode ( ,?\ght2 & if we realize t ?is ,po9t ( ,orig9ation is ,_s's p[] to produce some?+ out ( no?+1 & t x does ?is 9 accordance ) ! natural ord] ( sub/ance ( ! p>ticul> _w 9 :i* x is work+1 !n ! spiritual ego 9 ourselves1 z proce$+ direct f ! ,univ]sal ,_s1 %\ld be able fir/1 to s h>moni\sly comb9e ! work+ ( spiritual & physical laws 9 its own body z to keep x 9 p]fect heal?1 secondly to c>ry ?is process fur!r & r5ew ! body1 ?us eradicat+ ! effects ( old age1 & ?irdly to c>ry ! process /ill fur!r & p]petuate ?is r5ew$ body z long z ! individual might desire4 ,if ! /ud5t %[s ?is to "o ( 8 av]age acqua9tances :o has nev] giv5 any ?\ght to ^! ?+s1 8 fri5d w und\bt$ly exclaim ,tommy rot6 ev5 if he does n use a /rong] expletive4 ,he w at once appeal to ! pa/ exp]i5ce ( all mank9d1 8 argum5t be+ t :at has n be5 9 ! pa/ _c be 9 ! future2 yet he does n apply ! same argum5t to a]onautics & is q oblivi\s ( ! fact t ! ,sacr$ ,volume :i* he rev]5ces conta9s promises ( ^! v ?+s4 ,! really e>ne/ /ud5t mu/ nev] =get ! maxim t ,pr9ciple is n b\nd by ,prec$5t--if x 7 we %\ld /ill be primitive savages4 ,to use ! ,creative ,process we mu/ ,affirm ! ,creative ,p[]1 t is to say1 we mu/ g back to ! ,beg9n+ ( ! s]ies & />t ) ,pure ,_s1 only rememb]+ t ?is />t+-po9t is n[ to be f\nd 9 ourselves1 = ?is is :at di/+ui%es ! individual ,creative ,process f ! cosmic "o4 ,?is is :]e ! importance ( realiz+ only ,,"o ,orig9at+ ,p[] in/ead ( two int]act+ p[]s comes 91 = x means t we d n d]ive our p[] f any exi/+ pol>ity1 b t we are go+ to e/abli% pol>ities :i* w />t second>y causation on ! l9es :i* we ?us det]m9e4 ,?is also is :]e ! importance comes 9 ( recogniz+ t ! only possible orig9at+ movem5t ( _s mu/ be ,self-contemplation1 = ?is %[s u t we d n h to contemplate exi/+ conditions b ! ,div9e ,ideal1 & t ?is contemplation ( ! ,div9e ,ideal ( ,man is ! ,self-contemplation ( ! ,_s f ! /&po9t ( ,human ,individuality4 ,!n ! "q arises1 if ^! pr9ciples are true1 :y are we n demon/rat+ !m8 ,well1 :5 our fundam5tal pr9ciple is obvi\sly correct & yet we d n get ! prop] results1 ! only inf]5ce is t some:]e or o!r we h introduc$ some?+ antagoni/ic to ! fundam5tal pr9ciple1 some?+ n inh]5t 9 ! pr9ciple itself & :i* !re=e owes its pres5ce to "s action ( our own4 ,n[ ! error consi/s 9 ! belief t ! ,creative ,p[] is limit$ by ! mat]ial 9 :i* x works4 ,if ?is be assum$1 !n y h to calculate ! resi/ances (f]$ by ! mat]ial2 & s9ce by ! t]ms ( ! ,creative ,process ^! resi/ances d n really exi/1 y h no basis ( calculation at all--9 fact y h no means ( kn[+ :]e y are1 & ev]y?+ is 9 confusion4 ,?is is :y x is s important to rememb] t ! ,creative ,process is ! action ( a ,s+le ,p[]1 & t ! int]action ( two opposite pol>ities comes 9 at a lat] /age1 & is n creative1 b only di/ributive--t is to say1 x localizes ! ,en]gy already proce$+ f ! ,s+le ,p[]4 ,?is is a fundam5tal tru? :i* %\ld nev] be lo/ sight (4 ,s long1 h[ev]1 z we fail to see ?is tru? we necess>ily limit ! ,creative ,p[] by ! mat]ial x works 91 & 9 practise we d ?is by ref]r+ to pa/ exp]i5ce z ! only /&>d ( judgm5t4 ,we are measur+ ! ,fif? ,k+dom by ! /&>d ( ! ,f\r?1 z ?\gh we %\ld say t an intellectual man1 a be+ ( ! ,f\r? ,k+dom1 0 to be limit$ by ! conditions :i* obta9 9 ! ,fir/ or ,m9]al ,k+dom--to use ,scriptural language we are seek+ ! ,liv+ among ! dead4 ,& moreov] at ! pres5t "t a new ord] ( exp]i5ce is beg9n+ to op5 out to u1 = well au!nticat$ in/ances ( ! cure ( disease by ! invisible p[] ( ! ,_s are /eadily increas+ 9 numb]4 ,! facts are n[ too pat5t to be d5i$--:at we want is a bett] k ( ! p[] :i* acc\nts = !m4 ,& if ?is beg9n+ is n[ ) u1 by :at reason c we limit x8 ,! diff]5ce betwe5 ! heal+ ( disease & ! r5ewal ( ! entire organism & ! p]petuation ( life is only a diff]5ce ( degree & n ( k9d2 s t ! actual exp]i5ce ( increas+ numb]s %[s ! work+ ( a pr9ciple to :i* we c logically set no limits4 ,if we get ! /eps ( ! ,creative ,process cle>ly into our m9ds we %all see :y we h hi!rto _h su* small results4 ,_s creates by ,self-contemplation2 ,!re=e1 ,:at x contemplates itself z be+1 t x becomes4 ,y are individualiz$ ,_s2 ,!re=e1 ,:at y contemplate z ! ,law ( y\r be+ becomes ! ,law ( y\r be+4 ,h5ce1 contemplate a ,law ( ,dea? aris+ out ( ! ,=ces ( ! ,mat]ial react+ aga9/ ! ,p[] ( ! ,_s & ov]com+ x1 & y impress ?is mode ( self-recognition ^u ,_s 9 y\rself4 ,( c\rse y _c alt] its inh]5t nature1 b y cause x to "w "u negative conditions & ?us make x produce negative results s f> z y y\rself are conc]n$4 ,b rev]se ! process1 & contemplate a ,law ( ,life z inh]5t 9 ! v ,be+ ( ! ,_s1 & !re=e z inh]5t 9 _s 9 y\rself2 & contemplate ! =ces ( ! ,mat]ial z practically non-exi/5t 9 ! ,creative ,process1 because !y are products ( x & n causes--look at ?+s 9 ?is way & y w impress a correspond+ conception ^u ! ,_s :i*1 by ! ,law ( ,reciprocity1 ?us ent]s into ,self-contemplation on ^! l9es f ! /&po9t ( y\r own individuality2 & !n by ! nature ( ! ,creative ,process a correspond+ ext]nalization is b\nd to take place4 ,?us our initial "q1 ,h[ did any?+ come into exi/5ce at all1 br+s u to ! recognition ( a ,law ( ,life :i* we may ea* specialize = ourselves2 & 9 ! degree to :i* we specialize x we %all f9d ! ,creative ,pr9ciple at "w )9 u build+ up a heal?i] & happi] p]sonality 9 m9d1 body1 & circum/ances4 ,only we mu/ le>n to di/+ui% ! vehicles ( ,_s f ,_s itself1 = ! di/9ction has v important be>+s4 ,:at di/+ui%es ! vehicles f ! ,_s is ! ,law ( ,gr[?4 ,! ,_s is ! ,=mless pr9ciple ( ,life1 & ! vehicle is a ,=m 9 :i* ?is pr9ciple functions4 ,n[ ! vehicle is a projection by ! ,_s ( sub/ance coord9ate ) ! natural ord] ( ! plane on :i* ! vehicle functions1 & !re=e requires to be built up com=mably to t ord]4 ,?is build+ up is :at we speak ( z ,gr[?2 & s9ce ! pr9ciple :i* causes ! gr[? is ! individualiz$ ,_s1 ! rate at :i* ! gr[? w g on w dep5d on ! am\nt ( vitaliz+ en]gy ! ,_s puts into x1 & ! am\nt ( vitaliz+ en]gy w dep5d on ! degree 9 :i* ! individualiz$ ,_s appreciates its own liv+ness1 & f9ally ! degree ( ?is appreciation w dep5d on ! quality ( ! individual's p]ception ( ! ,great ,all-orig9at+ ,_s z reflect+ itself 9 him & ?us mak+ 8 contemplation ( ,x no?+ else ?an ! ,creative ,self-contemplation ( ! ,_s proce$+ f an individual & p]sonal c5t]4 ,we mu/ !re=e n omit ! ,law ( ,gr[? 9 ! vehicle f our conception ( ! work+ ( ! ,_s4 ,z a matt] ( fact ! vehicle has no?+ to say 9 ! matt] = x is simply a projection f ! ,_s2 b = ?is v reason its =mation w be sl[ or rapid 9 exact proportion to ! individual _s's vitaliz+ conception4 ,we c\ld imag9e a degree ( vitaliz+ conception t w\ld produce ! correspond+ =m in/antane\sly1 b at pres5t we mu/ all[ = ! weakness ( our spiritual p[]--n z ?9k+ x by any means incapable ( accompli%+ its object1 b z be+ f> sl[] 9 op]ation n[ ?an we hope to see x 9 ! future--& s we mu/ n all[ ourselves to be disc\rag$1 b mu/ hold our ?\ght kn[+ t x is do+ its creative "w1 & t ! correspond+ gr[? is sl[ly b surely tak+ place--?us foll[+ ! ,div9e precept t m5 ought always to pray & n to fa9t4 ,gradually z we ga9 exp]i5ce on ^! new l9es our confid5ce 9 ! p[] ( ! ,_s w increase1 & we %all be less incl9$ to argue f ! negative side ( ?+s1 & ?us ! h9drances to ! infl[ ( ! ,orig9at+ ,_s w be m & m remov$1 & great] & great] results w be obta9$4 ,if we w\ld h our m9ds cle> on ?is subject ( ,manife/ation we %\ld rememb] its ?reefold nature3--,fir/ ! ,g5]al ,life-,pr9ciple1 secondly ! ,localization ( ?is pr9ciple 9 ! ,individual1 & ?irdly ! ,gr[? ( ! ,vehicle z x is project$ by ! individualiz$ _s ) m or less en]gy4 ,x is a sequ5ce ( progressive cond5sation f ! ,undiff]5tiat$ ,univ]sal ,_s to ! ultimate & out]mo/ vehicle--a tru? en%r9$ 9 ! esot]ic maxim t ,matt] is ,_s at its l[e/ level4 ,! =ms ?us produc$ are 9 true accord ) ! g5]al ord] ( ,nature on ! p>ticul> plane :]e !y occur1 & are !re=e p]fectly diff]5t f =ms tempor>ily consolidat$ out ( mat]ial drawn f o!r liv+ organisms4 ,^! latt] phantasmal bodies are held toge!r only by an act ( conc5trat$ volition1 & c !re=e only be ma9ta9$ = a %ort "t & ) ef=t2 :ile ! body :i* ! individualiz$ _s1 or ego1 builds = itself is produc$ by a p]fectly natural process & does n require any ef=t to su/a9 x1 s9ce x is kept 9 t\* ) ! :ole sy/em ( ! planet by ! cont9u\s & ef=tless action ( ! individual's sub-consci\s m9d4 ,?is is :]e ! action ( sub-consci\s m9d z ! build] ( ! body comes 94 ,sub-consci\s m9d acts 9 accordance ) ! aggregate ( sugge/ion impress$ ^u x by ! consci\s m9d1 & if ?is sugge/ion is t ( p]fect h>mony ) ! physical laws ( ! planet !n a correspond+ build+ by ! sub-consci\s m9d w take place1 a process :i*1 s f> f imply+ any ef=t1 consi/s r 9 a re/ful s5se ( unity ) ,nature4#d ,& if to ?is s5se ( union ) ! ,s\l ( ,nature1 t ,univ]sal ,sub-consci\s ,m9d :i* holds 9 ! cosmos ! same place t ! sub-consci\s m9d does 9 ourselves--if to ?is !re be sup]add$ a s5se ( union ) ! ,all-creat+ ,_s f :i* ! ,s\l ( ,nature fl[s1 !n ?r\gh ! m$ium ( ! individual's sub-consci\s m9d su* specializ$ effects c be produc$ 9 8 body z to transc5d our pa/ exp]i5ces )\t 9 any way violat+ ! ord] ( ! univ]se4 ,! ,old ,law 0 ! manife/ation ( ! ,pr9ciple ( ,life work+ "u con/rict$ conditions3 ! ,new ,law is ! manife/ation ( ! same ,pr9ciple work+ "u exp&+ conditions4 ,?us x is t ?\gh ,god nev] *anges we are said to increase ) ! increase ( ,god4 ,,*apt] ,v ,,! ,,p]sonal ,,factor ,i h already po9t$ out t ! pres5ce ( a s+le all-embrac+ ,cosmic ,m9d is an absolute necessity = ! exi/5ce ( any creation :atev]1 = ! reason t if ea* individual m9d 7 an entirely sep>ate c5t] ( p]ception1 n l9k$ to all o!r m9ds by a common gr\nd ( und]ly+ m5tality indep5d5t ( all individual action1 !n no two p]sons w\ld see ! same ?+ at ! same "t1 9 fact no two individuals w\ld be consci\s ( liv+ 9 ! same _w4 ,if ?is 7 ! case !re w\ld be no common /&>d to :i* to ref] our s5sations2 &1 inde$1 com+ into exi/5ce ) no consci\sness ( environm5t except su* z we c\ld =m by our own unaid$ ?\ght1 & hav+ by ! hypo!sis no /&>d by :i* to =m our ?\ghts1 we c\ld n =m ! conception ( any environm5t at all1 & consequ5tly c\ld h no recognition ( our own exi/5ce4 ,! confusion ( ?\ght involv$ ev5 9 ! attempt to /ate su* a condition %[s x to be p]fectly inconceivable1 = ! simple reason t x is self-contradictory & self-de/ructive4 ,on ?is acc\nt x is cle> t our own exi/5ce & t ( ! _w ar\nd u necess>ily implies ! pres5ce ( a ,univ]sal ,m9d act+ on c]ta9 fix$ l9es ( its own :i* e/abli% ! basis = ! work+ ( all individual m9ds4 ,?is p>am\nt action ( ! ,univ]sal ,m9d ?us sets an un*angeable /&>d by :i* all individual m5tal action mu/ ev5tually be measur$1 & !re=e our fir/ conc]n is to asc]ta9 :at ?is /&>d is & to make x ! basis ( our own action4 ,b if ! indep5d5t exi/5ce ( a common /&>d ( ref]5ce is necess>y = our self-recognition simply z inhabitants ( ! _w we live 91 !n a =tiori a common /&>d ( ref]5ce is necess>y = our recognition ( ! unique place we hold 9 ! ,creative ,ord]1 :i* is t ( introduc+ ! ,p]sonal ,factor )\t :i* ! possibilities conta9$ 9 ! great ,cosmic ,laws w\ld rema9 undevelop$1 & ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s c\ld nev] rea* ^? inf9ite unfoldm5ts ( :i* x is logically capable4 ,! evolution ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor is !re=e ! po9t ) :i* we are mo/ conc]n$4 ,z a matt] ( fact1 :atev] !ories we may hold to ! contr>y1 we d all realize ! same cosmic environm5t 9 ! same way2 t is to say1 our m9ds all act accord+ to c]ta9 g5]ic laws :i* und]lie all our individual div]sities ( ?\ght & feel+4 ,?is is s because we are made t way & _c help x4 ,b ) ! ,p]sonal ,factor ! case is diff]5t4 ,a /&>d is no less necess>y1 b we are n s made z to con=m to x automatically4 ,! v conception ( automatic con=mity to a p]sonal /&>d is self-contradictory1 = x does away ) ! v ?+ t con/itutes p]sonality1 namely fre$om ( volition1 ! use ( ! p[]s ( ,initiative & ,selection4 ,= ?is reason con=mity to ! ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality mu/ be a matt] ( *oice1 :i* am\nts to ! same ?+ z say+ t x re/s ) ea* individual to =m 8 own conception ( a /&>d ( ,p]sonality2 b :i* lib]ty1 h[ev]1 c>ries ) x ! inevitable result t we %all br+ into manife/ation ! conditions correspond+ to ! sort ( p]sonality we accept z our normal /&>d4 ,i w\ld draw att5tion to ! words ,normal ,/&>d4 ,:at we %all ev5tually atta9 is1 n :at we m]ely wi%1 b :at we reg>d z normal4 ,! reason is t s9ce we sub-consci\sly "k ourselves to be bas$ ^u ! inh]5t ,law ( ! ,univ]sal ,m9d we feel1 :e!r we c reason x out or n1 t we _c =ce ! ,all-produc+ ,m9d to "w contr>y to its own inh]5t qualities1 & !re=e we intuitively recognize t we _c transc5d ! sort ( p]sonality :i* is normal accord+ to ! ,law ( ,univ]sal ,m9d4 ,?is ?\ght is always at ! back ( our m9d & we _c get away f x = ! simple reason t x is inh]5t 9 our m5tal con/itution1 because our m9d is itself a product ( ! ,creative ,process2 & to suppose ourselves transc5d+ ! possibilities conta9$ 9 ! ,orig9at+ ,m9d w\ld involve ! absurdity ( suppos+ t we c get ! great] out ( ! less4 ,nev]!less !re are "s :o try to d s1 & _! position is z foll[s4 ,!y say 9 effect1 ,i want to transc5d ! /&>d ( humanity z ,i see x ar\nd me4 ,b ?is is ! normal /&>d accord+ to ! ,law ( ! ,univ]se1 !re=e ,i h to get above ! ,law ( ! ,univ]se4 ,consequ5tly ,i _c draw ! necess>y p[] f t ,law1 & s !re is n[h]e else to get x except f myself4 ,?us ! aspirant is ?r[n back ^u 8 own individual w z ! ultimate p[]1 ) ! result t ! onus lies on him ( conc5trat+ a =ce suffici5t to ov]come ! ,law ( ! ,univ]se4 ,!re is ?us cont9ually pres5t to him a sugge/ion ( /ruggle aga9/ a trem5d\s oppos+ =ce1 & z a consequ5ce he is cont9ually subject+ himself to a /ra9 :i* gr[s m & m int5se z he realizes ! magnitude ( ! =ce aga9/ :i* he is cont5d+4 ,!n z he beg9s to realize ! inequality ( ! /ruggle he seeks = extrane\s aid1 & s he falls back on v>i\s exp$i5ts1 all ( :i* h ?is 9 common t !y ultimately am\nt to invok+ ! assi/ance ( o!r individualities1 n see+ t ?is involves ! same fallacy :i* has br\ght him to 8 pres5t /raits1 ! fallacy1 namely1 ( suppos+ t any individuality c develop a p[] great] ?an t ( ! s\rce f :i* itself proce$s4 ,! fallacy is a radical "o2 & !re=e all ef=ts bas$ ^u x are =e-doom$ to ultimate failure1 :e!r !y take ! =m ( reliance on p]sonal =ce ( w1 or magical rites1 or au/]ity practis$ aga9/ ! body1 or attempts by abnormal conc5tration to absorb ! individual 9 ! univ]sal1 or ! invocation ( spirits1 or any o!r me?od--! same fallacy is involv$ 9 !m all1 t ! less is l>g] ?an ! great]4 ,n[ ! po9t to be not$ is t ! idea ( transc5d+ ! pres5t conditions ( humanity does n necess>ily imply ! idea ( transc5d+ ! normal law ( humanity4 ,! mi/ake we h hi!rto made has be5 9 fix+ ! ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality too l[ & 9 tak+ our pa/ exp]i5ces z measur+ ! ultimate possibilities ( ! race4 ,our lib]ty consi/s 9 our ability to =m our own conception ( ! ,normal ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality1 only subject to ! conditions aris+ out ( ! inh]5t ,law ( ! und]ly+ ,univ]sal ,m9d2 & s ! :ole ?+ resolves itself into ! "q1 ,:at are ^? fundam5tal conditions8 ,! ,law is t we _c transc5d ! ,normal2 !re=e comes ! "q1 ,:at is ! ,normal8 ,i h endeavor$ to answ] ?is "q 9 ! *apt] on ! ,div9e ,ideal1 b s9ce ?is is ! crucial po9t ( ! :ole subject we may devote a little fur!r att5tion to x4 ,! ,normal ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality mu/ necess>ily be ! reproduction 9 ,individuality ( :at ! ,univ]sal ,m9d is 9 itself1 because1 by ! nature ( ! ,creative ,process1 ?is /&>d results f ,_s's ,self-contemplation at ! /age :]e its recognition is turn$ t[>d its own p[] ( ,initiative & ,selection4 ,at ?is /age ,_s's ,self-recognition has pass$ beyond t ( ,self-expression ?r\gh a m]e ,law ( ,av]ages into ! recognition ( :at ,i h v5tur$ to call its ,arti/ic ,ability2 & z we h se5 t ,self-recognition at any /age c only be atta9$ by ! realization ( a relation /imulat+ t p>ticul> sort ( consci\sness1 x foll[s t = ! purpose ( ?is fur!r advance expression ?r\gh individuals ( a correspond+ type is a necessity4 ,!n by ! ,law ( ,reciprocity su* be+s mu/ possess p[]s simil> to ^? contemplat$ 9 itself by ! ,orig9at+ ,_s1 9 o!r words !y mu/ be 9 _! own sph]e ! image & lik5ess ( ! ,_s z x sees itself4 ,n[ we h se5 t ! ,creat+ ,_s necess>ily possesses ! p[]s ( ,initiative & ,selection4 ,^! we may call its active prop]ties--! summ+ up ( :at x does4 ,b :at any p[] does dep5ds on :at x is1 = ! simple reason t x _c give out :at x does n conta92 !re=e at ! back ( ! initiative & selective p[] ( ! ,_s we mu/ f9d :at ! ,_s is1 namely1 :at are its sub/antive prop]ties4 ,to beg9 ) x mu/ be ,life4 ,!n because x is ,life x mu/ be ,love1 because z ! undiff]5tiat$ ,pr9ciple ( ,life x _c d o!rwise ?an t5d to ! full] developm5t ( life 9 ea* individual1 & ! pure motive ( giv+ great] enjoym5t ( life is ,love4 ,!n because x is ,life guid$ by ,love x mu/ also be ,light1 t is to say1 ! prim>y all-inclusive p]ception ( b\ndless manife/ations yet to be4 ,!n f ?is proce$s ,p[]1 because !re is no oppos+ =ce at ! level ( ,pure ,_s2 & !re=e ,life urg$ =w>d by ,love or ! desire = recognition1 & by ,light or ! pure p]ception ( ! ,law ( ,inf9ite ,possibility1 mu/ necess>ily produce ,p[]1 = ! simple reason t "u ^! conditions x c\ld n /op %ort ( action1 = t w\ld be ! d5ial ( ! ,life1 ,love1 & ,light :i* x is4 ,!n because ! ,_s is ,life1 ,love1 ,light1 & ,p[]1 x is also ,peace1 aga9 = a v simple reason1 t be+ ! ,_s ( ! ,:ole x _c set "o "p 9 antagonism aga9/ ano!r1 = t w\ld be to de/roy ! :ol5ess4 ,next ! ,_s mu/ be ,beauty1 because on ! same pr9ciple ( ,:ol5ess x mu/ duly proportion e "p to e o!r "p1 & ! due proportion+ ( all p>ts is beauty4 ,& la/ly ! ,_s mu/ be ,joy1 because1 work+ on ^! l9es1 x _c d o!rwise ?an f9d pleasure 9 ! ,self-expression :i* its works af=d x1 & 9 ! contemplation ( ! limitlessness ( ! ,creative ,process by :i* ea* realiz$ /age ( evolution1 h[ev] excell5t1 is /ill ! /epp+-/one to some?+ yet m excell5t1 & s on 9 ev]la/+ progression4 ,= ^! reasons we may sum up ! ,sub/antive ,be+ ( ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s z ,life1 ,love1 ,light1 ,p[]1 ,peace1 ,beauty1 & ,joy2 & its ,active ,p[] z t ( ,initiative & ,selection4 ,^!1 !re=e1 con/itute ! basic laws ( ! und]ly+ univ]sal m5tality :i* sets ! ,/&>d ( ,normal ,p]sonality--a /&>d :i*1 :5 se5 9 ?is light1 transc5ds ! utmo/ scope ( our ?\ght1 = x is no?+ else ?an ! ,_s ( ! ,inf9ite ,affirmative conceiv$ 9 ,human ,p]sonality4 ,?is /&>d is !re=e t ( ! ,univ]sal ,_s itself reproduc$ 9 ,human ,individuality by ! same ,law ( ,reciprocity :i* we h f\nd to be ! fundam5tal law ( ! ,creative ,process--only n[ we are trac+ ! action ( ?is ,law 9 ! ,fif? ,k+dom in/ead ( 9 ! ,f\r?4 ,?is ,/&>d1 !n1 we may call ! ,univ]sal ,pr9ciple ( ,humanity1 & hav+ n[ trac$ ! successive /eps by :i* x is rea*$ f ! fir/ cosmic movem5t ( ! ,_s 9 ! =mation ( ! prim>y nebula1 we ne$ n g ov] ! old gr\nd aga91 & may h5ce=w>d take ?is ,div9e ,pr9ciple ( ,humanity z our ,normal ,/&>d & make x ! />t+ po9t = our fur!r evolution4 ,b h[ are we to d ?is8 ,simply by us+ ! "o me?od ( ,creative ,process1 t is1 ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s4 ,we n[ "k ourselves to be ,reciprocals ( ! ,div9e ,_s1 c5t]s 9 :i* ,x f9ds a fre% /&po9t = ,self-contemplation2 & s ! way to rise to ! heights ( ?is ,great ,patt]n is by contemplat+ x z ! ,normal ,/&>d ( our own ,p]sonality4 ,& be x not$ t ! ,patt]n ?us set be=e u is ,univ]sal4 ,x is ! embodim5t ( all ! great pr9ciples ( ! ,affirmative1 & s 9 no way int]f]es ) our own p>ticul> individuality--t is some?+ built up ^u ?is f\ndation1 some?+ additional af=d+ ! diff]5tiat+ m$ium ?r\gh :i* ?is unify+ ,pr9ciple f9ds v>iety ( expression1 !re=e we ne$ be "u no appreh5sion le/ by re/+ ^u ?is ,patt]n we %\ld become less ourselves4 ,on ! contr>y ! recognition ( x sets u at lib]ty to become m fully ourselves because we "k t we are bas+ our developm5t1 n ^u ! /r5g? ( our own unaid$ w1 nor yet ^u any sort ( extrane\s help1 b ^u ! ,univ]sal ,law itself1 manife/+ ?r\gh u 9 ! prop] sequ5ce ( ! ,creative ,ord]2 s t we are /ill deal+ ) ,univ]sal pr9ciples1 only ! pr9ciple by :i* we are n[ work+ is ! ,univ]sal ,pr9ciple ( ,p]sonality4 ,i wi% ! /ud5t to get ?is idea v cle>ly because ?is is really ! crux ( ! passage f ! ,f\r? ,k+dom into ! ,fif?4 ,! great problem ( ! future ( evolution is ! introduction ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor4 ,! reason :y ?is is s is v simple :5 we see x4 ,to take a ?\ght f my own ,dor ,lectures we may put x 9 ?is way4 ,9 =m] days no "o ?\ght ( build+ %ips ( iron because iron does n float2 yet n[ %ips are seldom built ( any?+ else1 ?\gh ! relative specific gravities ( iron & wat] rema9 un*ang$4 ,:at has *ang$ is ! ,p]sonal ,factor4 ,x has exp&$ to a m intellig5t p]ception ( ! law ( flotation1 & we n[ see t wood floats & iron s9ks1 bo? ( !m by ! same pr9ciple work+ "u opposite conditions1 ! law1 namely1 t any?+ w float :i* bulk = bulk is light] ?an ! volume ( wat] displac$ by x1 s t by includ+ 9 our calculations ! displacem5t ( ! vessel z well z ! specific gravity ( ! mat]ial1 we n[ make iron float by ! v same law by :i* x s9ks4 ,?is example %[s t ! function ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor is to analyze ! manife/ations ( ,law :i* are spontane\sly af=d$ by ,nature & to discov] ! ,univ]sal ,affirmative ,pr9ciple :i* lies hidd5 )9 !m1 & !n by ! ex]cise ( our p[]s ( ,initiative & ,selection to provide su* specializ$ conditions z w enable ! ,univ]sal ,pr9ciple to "w 9 p]fectly new ways transc5d+ any?+ 9 our pa/ exp]i5ce4 ,?is is h[ all progress has be5 a*iev$ up to ! pres5t2 & is ! way 9 :i* all progress mu/ be a*iev$ 9 ! future1 only = ! purpose ( evolution1 or gr[? f )91 we mu/ transf] ! me?od to ! spiritual plane4 ,! function1 !n1 ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor 9 ! ,creative ,ord] is to provide specializ$ conditions by ! use ( ! p[]s ( ,selection & ,initiative1 a tru? indicat$ by ! maxim ,nature unaid$ fails2 b ! difficulty is t if enhanc$ p[]s 7 atta9$ by ! :ole population ( ! _w )\t any common basis = _! use1 _! promiscu\s ex]cise c\ld only result 9 *aotic confusion & ! de/ruction ( ! entire race4 ,to introduce ! creative p[] ( ! ,individual & at ! same "t avoid conv]t+ x into a deva/at+ flood is ! great problem ( ! transition f ! ,f\r? ,k+dom into ! ,fif?4 ,= ?is purpose x becomes necess>y to h a ,/&>d ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor indep5d5t ( any individual conceptions1 j z we f\nd t 9 ord] = u to atta9 self-consci\sness at all x 0 a necessity t !re %\ld be a ,univ]sal ,m9d z ! g5]ic basis ( all individual m5tality2 only 9 reg>d to ! g5]ic build ( m9d ! con=mity is necess>ily automatic1 :ile 9 reg>d to ! specializ+ process ! fact t ! ess5ce ( t process is ,selection & ,initiative r5d]s x impossible = ! con=mity to ! ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality to be automatic--! v nature ( ! ?+ makes x a matt] ( individual *oice4 ,n[ a ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality indep5d5t ( individual conceptions mu/ be ! ess5ce ( ,p]sonality z di/+ui%$ f individual idiosyncrasies1 & c !re=e be no?+ else ?an ! ,creative ,life1 ,love1 ,beauty1 etc41 view$ z a ,div9e ,individuality1 by id5tify+ ourselves ) :i* we elim9ate all possibility ( conflict ) o!r p]sonalities bas$ on ! same fundam5tal recognition2 & ! v univ]sality ( ?is ,/&>d all[s free play to all our p>ticul> idiosyncrasies :ile at ! same "t prev5t+ !m f antagoniz+ ! fundam5tal pr9ciples to :i* we h f\nd t ! ,self-contemplation ( ! ,orig9at+ ,_s mu/ necess>ily give rise4 ,9 ?is way we atta9 a ,/&>d ( ,measurem5t = our own p[]s4 ,if we recognize no su* ,/&>d our developm5t ( spiritual p[]s1 our discov]y ( ! imm5se possibilities hidd5 9 ! inn] laws ( ,nature & ( our own be+1 c only become a sc\rge to ourselves & o!rs1 & x is = ?is reason t ^! secrets are s jeal\sly gu>d$ by ^? :o "k !m1 & t ov] ! entrance to ! temple are writt5 ! words ,eskato ,bebeloi--,h5ce ye ,pr(ane4 ,b if we recognize & accept ?is ,/&>d ( ,measurem5t !n we ne$ nev] fe> our discov]y ( hidd5 p[]s ei!r 9 ourselves or 9 ,nature1 = on ?is basis x becomes impossible = u to misuse !m4 ,!re=e x is t all sy/ematic tea*+ on ^! subjects beg9s ) in/ruction reg>d+ ! ,creative ,ord] ( ! ,cosmos1 & !n proce$s to exhibit ! same ,ord] z reproduc$ on ! plane ( ,p]sonality & s af=d+ a fre% />t+ po9t = ! ,creative ,process by ! introduction ( ,individual ,initiative & ,selection4 ,?is is ! doctr9e ( ! ,macrocosm & ! ,microcosm2 & ! transition f ! g5]ic work+ ( ! ,creative ,_s 9 ! ,cosmos to its specific work+ 9 ! ,individual is :at is meant by ! doctr9e ( ! ,octave4 ,,*apt] ,,vi ,,! ,,/&>d ,,( ,,p]sonality ,we h n[ got "s g5]al idea z to ! place ( ! p]sonal factor 9 ! ,creative ,ord]1 & s ! next "q is1 ,h[ does ?is affect ourselves8 ,! answ] is t if we h grasp$ ! fundam5tal fact t ! mov+ p[] 9 ! ,creative ,process is ! self-contemplation ( ,_s1 & if we also see t1 because we are m9iature reproductions ( ! ,orig9al ,_s1 our contemplation ( ,x becomes ,its contemplation ( ,itself f ! /&po9t ( our own individuality--if we h grasp$ ^! fundam5tal conceptions1 !n x foll[s t our process = develop+ p[] is to contemplate ! ,orig9at+ ,_s z ! s\rce ( ! p[] we want to develop4 ,& "h we mu/ gu>d aga9/ a mi/ake :i* p (t5 make :5 look+ to ! ,_s z ! s\rce ( p[]4 ,we are apt to reg>d x z sometimes giv+ & sometimes )hold+ p[]1 & consequ5tly are nev] sure :i* way x w act4 ,b by s do+ we make ,_s contemplate itself z hav+ no def9ite action at all1 z a plus & m9us :i* mutually cancel ea* o!r1 & !re=e by ! ,law ( ! ,creative ,process no result is to be expect$4 ,! mi/ake consi/s 9 reg>d+ ! p[] z some?+ sep>ate f ! ,_s2 :]eas by ! analysis ( ! ,creative ,process :i* we h n[ made we see t ! ,_s itself is ! p[]1 because ! p[] comes into exi/5ce only ?r\gh ,_s's self-contemplation4 ,!n ! logical inf]5ce f ?is is t by contemplat+ ! ,_s z ! p[]1 & vice v]sa by contemplat+ ! p[] z ! ,_s1 a simil> p[] is be+ g5]at$ 9 ourselves4 ,aga9 an important conclusion foll[s f ?is1 :i* is t to g5]ate any p>ticul> sort ( p[] we %\ld contemplate x 9 ! ab/ract r ?an z appli$ to ! p>ticul> set ( circum/ances we h 9 h&4 ,! circum/ances indicate ! sort ( p[] we want b !y d n help u to g5]ate x2 r !y impress u ) a s5se ( some?+ contr>y to ! p[]1 some?+ :i* has to be ov]come by x1 & !re=e we %\ld endeavor to dwell on ! p[] 9 itself1 & s come into t\* ) x 9 its limitless inf9itude4 ,x is "h t we beg9 to f9d ! b5efit ( a ,div9e ,/&>d ( ,human ,individuality4 ,t also is an ,inf9ite ,pr9ciple1 & by id5tify+ ourselves ) x we br+ to be> ^u ! ab/ract conception ( inf9ite ,imp]sonal ,p[] a correspond+ conception ( ,inf9ite ,p]sonality1 s t we ?us import ! ,p]sonal ,factor :i* is able to use ! ,p[] )\t impos+ any /ra9 ^u ourselves4 ,we "k t by ! v nature ( ! ,creative ,process we are "o ) ! ,orig9at+ ,_s & !re=e "o ) all ! pr9ciples ( its ,be+1 & consequ5tly "o ) its ,inf9ite ,p]sonality1 & !re=e our contemplation ( x z ! ,p[] :i* we want gives u ! p[] to use t ,p[]4 ,?is is ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s employ$ f ! individual /&po9t = ! g5]at+ ( p[]4 ,!n comes ! application ( ! p[] ?us g5]at$4 ,b !re is only "o ,creative ,process1 t ( ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s1 & !re=e ! way to use ?is process = ! application ( ! p[] is to contemplate ourselves z surr\nd$ by ! conditions :i* we want to produce4 ,?is does n mean t we are to lay d[n a h>d & fa/ patt]n ( ! conditions & /r5u\sly endeavor to compel ! ,p[] to con=m its work+ to e detail ( our m5tal picture--to d s w\ld be to h9d] its work+ & to exhau/ ourselves4 ,:at we are to dwell ^u is ! idea ( an ,inf9ite ,p[] produc+ ! happ9ess we desire1 & because ?is ,p[] is also ! ,=m+ ,p[] ( ! univ]se tru/+ x to give t =m to ! conditions :i* w mo/ p]fectly react ^u u to produce ! p>ticul> /ate ( consci\sness desir$4 ,?us nei!r on ! side ( 9-draw+ nor ( out-giv+ is !re any con/ra9+ ( ! ,p[]1 :ile 9 bo? cases !re is an initiative & selective action on ! "p ( ! individual--= ! g5]at+ ( p[] he takes ! initiative ( invok+ x by contemplation1 & he makes selection ( ! sort ( p[] to invoke2 :ile on ! giv+-out side he makes selection ( ! purpose = :i* ! ,p[] is to be employ$1 & takes ! initiative by 8 ?\ght ( direct+ ! ,p[] to t purpose4 ,he ?us fulfils ! fundam5tal requirem5ts ( ! ,creative ,process by ex]cis+ ,_s's inh]5t faculties ( initiative & selection by means ( its inh]5t me?od1 namely by ,self-contemplation4 ,! :ole action is id5tical 9 k9d ) t :i* produces ! cosmos1 & x is n[ repeat$ 9 m9iature = ! p>ticul> _w ( ! individual2 only we mu/ rememb] t ?is m9iature reproduction ( ! ,creative ,process is bas$ ^u ! great fundam5tal pr9ciples inh]5t 9 ! ,univ]sal ,m9d1 & _c be dissociat$ f !m )\t involv+ a conception ( ! individual :i* w ultimately be f\nd self-de/ructive because x cuts away ! f\ndation on :i* 8 individuality re/s4 ,x w !re=e be se5 t any individuality bas$ ^u ! fundam5tal ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality ?us involv$ 9 ! ,univ]sal ,m9d has rea*$ ! basic pr9ciple ( union ) ! ,orig9at+ ,_s itself1 & we are !re=e correct 9 say+ t union is atta9$ ?r\gh1 or by means (1 ?is ,/&>d ,p]sonality4 ,?is is a great tru? :i* 9 all ages has be5 set =? "u a v>iety ( symbolic /atem5ts2 (t5 misund]/ood1 & /ill cont9u+ to be s1 ?\gh ow+ to ! inh]5t vitality ( ! idea itself ev5 a p>tial appreh5sion ( x produces a correspond+ measure ( good results4 ,?is fall+ %ort has be5 occasion$ by ! failure to recognize an ,et]nal ,pr9ciple at ! back ( ! p>ticul> /atem5ts--9 a ^w ! failure to see :at !y 7 talk+ ab\t4 ,all pr9ciples are et]nal 9 !mselves1 & ?is is :at di/+ui%es !m f _! p>ticul> manife/ations z laws det]m9$ by tempor>y & local conditions4 ,if !n1 we w\ld rea* ! root ( ! matt] we mu/ p5etrate ?r\gh all v]bal /atem5ts to an ,et]nal ,pr9ciple :i* is z active n[ z ev] 9 ! pa/1 & :i* is z available to ourselves z to any :o h gone be=e u4 ,!re=e x is t :5 we disc]n an ,et]nal & ,univ]sal ,pr9ciple ( ,human ,p]sonality z necess>ily involv$ 9 ! ,ess5tial ,be+ ( ! ,orig9at+ ,univ]sal ,_s--,filius 9 gremio ,patris--we h discov]$ ! true ,normal ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality4 ,!n because ?is /&>d is no?+ else ?an ! pr9ciple ( ,p]sonality exp&$ to inf9itude1 !re is no limit to ! expansion :i* we ourselves may atta9 by ! op]ation 9 u ( ?is pr9ciple2 & s we are nev] plac$ 9 a position ( antagonism to ! true law ( our be+1 b on ! contr>y ! l>g] & m fundam5tal our conception ( p]sonal developm5t ! great] w be ! fulfilm5t :i* we give to ! ,law4 ,! ,normal ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality is f\nd to be itself ! ,law ( ! ,creative ,process work+ at ! p]sonal level2 & x _c be subject to limitation = ! simple reason t ! process be+ t ( ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s1 no limits c possibly be assign$ to ?is contemplation4 ,we ne$1 !re=e1 nev] be afraid ( =m+ too high an idea ( human possibilities provid$ always t we take ?is /&>d z ! f\ndation on :i* to build up ! edifice ( our p]sonality4 ,& we see t ?is /&>d is no arbitr>y "o b simply ! ,expression 9 ,p]sonality ( ! ,,"o all-embrac+ ,_s ( ! ,affirmative2 & !re=e ! only limitation impli$ by con=mity to x is t ( be+ prev5t$ f runn+ on l9es ! opposite ( ^? ( ! ,creative ,process1 t is to say1 f call+ into action causes ( dis9tegration & de/ruction4 ,9 ! truly ,con/ructive ,ord]1 !re=e1 ! ,div9e ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality is z really ! basis ( ! developm5t ( specific p]sonality z ! ,univ]sal ,m9d is ! necess>y basis ( g5]ic m5tality2 & j z )\t ?is g5]ic ultimate ( ,m9d we %\ld none ( u see ! same _w at ! same "t1 & 9 fact h no consci\sness ( exi/5ce1 s ap>t f ?is ,div9e ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality x is equally impossible = u to specialize ! g5]ic law ( our be+ s z to develop all ! glori\s possibilities t are lat5t 9 x4 ,only we mu/ nev] =get ! diff]5ce betwe5 ^! two /atem5ts ( ! ,univ]sal ,law--! "o is cosmic & g5]ic1 common to ! :ole race1 :e!r !y "k x or n1 a ,/&>d to :i* we all con=m automatically by ! m]e fact ( be+ human be+s2 :ile ! o!r is a p]sonal & individual ,/&>d1 automatic con=mity to :i* is impossible because t w\ld imply ! loss ( ^? p[]s ( ,initiative & ,selection :i* are ! v ess5ce ( ,p]sonality2 s t ?is ,/&>d necess>ily implies a p]sonal selection ( x 9 pref]5ce to o!r conceptions ( an antagoni/ic nature4 ,,*apt] ,,vii ,,race ,,?\ght ,,& ,,new ,,?\ght ,! /eady foll[+ up ( ! successive /ages ( ! ,creative ,process has l$ u to ! recognition ( an ,individuality 9 ! ,all-creat+ ,_s itself1 b an ,individuality :i* is by its v nature ,univ]sal1 & s _c be dep>t$ f )\t violat+ ! ess5tial pr9ciples on :i* ! fur!r expansion ( our own individuality dep5ds4 ,at ! same "t x is /rictly individual1 = x is ! ,_s ( ,individuality1 & is ?us to be di/+ui%$ f t m]ely g5]ic race-p]sonality :i* makes u human be+s at all4 ,race-p]sonality is ( c\rse ! necess>y basis = ! developm5t ( ?is ,individuality2 b if we d n see t x is only ! prelim9>y to fur!r evolution1 any o!r conception ( our p]sonality z memb]s ( ! race w prev5t our advance t[>d our prop] position 9 ! ,creative ,ord]1 :i* is t ( introduc+ ! ,p]sonal ,factor by ! ex]cise ( our individual p[] ( initiative & selection4 ,x is on ?is acc\nt t ,race-?\ght1 simply z su*1 is oppos$ to ! attempt ( ! individual to pass into a high] ord] ( life4 ,x limits him by /rong curr5ts ( negative sugge/ion bas$ on ! fallacy t ! p]petuation ( ! race requires ! dea? ( ! individual2#e & x is only :5 ! individual sees t ?is is n true1 & t 8 race- nature con/itutes ! gr\nd out ( :i* 8 new ,individuality is to be =m$1 t he becomes able to oppose ! negative p[] ( race-?\ght4 ,he does ?is by de/roy+ x ) its own weapon1 t is1 by f9d+ 9 ! race-nature itself ! v mat]ial to be us$ by ! ,_s = build+-up ! ,new ,man4 ,?is is a discov]y on ! spiritual plane equival5t to ! discov]y on ! physical plane t we c make iron float by ! same law by :i* x s9ks4 ,x is ! discov]y t :at we call ! mortal "p ( u is capable ( be+ br\ght "u a high] application ( ! ,univ]sal ,law ( ,life1 :i* w transmute x into an immortal pr9ciple4 ,:5 we see :at we call ! mortal "p ( u 9 ?is light we c employ ! v pr9ciple on :i* ! negative race-?\ght is f\nd$ z a weapon = ! de/ruction ( t ?\ght 9 our own m9ds4 ,! basis ( ! negative race-?\ght is ! idea t physical dea? is an ess5tial "p ( ! ,normal ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality1 & t ! body is compos$ ( s mu* neutral mat]ial ) :i* dea? c d :at x likes4 ,b x is precisely ?is neutrality ( matt] t makes x j z am5able to ! ,law ( ,life z to ! ,law ( ,dea?--x is simply neutral & n an orig9at+ p[] on ei!r side2 s !n :5 we realize t our ,normal ,/&>d ( ,p]sonality is n subject to dea?1 b is ! ,et]nal ,ess5ce & ,be+ ( ,life itself1 !n we see t ?is neutrality ( matt]--its inability to make selection or take initiative on its own acc\nt--is j :at makes x ! pla/ic m$ium = ! expression ( ,_s 9 ourselves4 ,9 ?is way ! g5]ic or race-m9d 9 ! individual becomes ! in/rum5t ?r\gh :i* ! specializ+ p[] ( ! ,_s works t[>d ! build+ up ( a p]sonality bas$ ^u ! truly ,normal ,/&>d ( ,individuality :i* we h f\nd to be inh]5t 9 ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s itself3 & s9ce ! :ole "q is t ( ! introduction ( ! factor ( p]sonal individuality into ! creative ord] ( causation1 ?is _c be done by depriv+ ! individual ( :at makes him a p]son in/ead ( a ?+1 namely1 ! p[] ( consci\s initiative & selection4 ,= ?is reason ! transition f ! ,f\r? ,k+dom into ! ,fif? _c be =c$ ^u ! race ei!r by a ,div9e fiat or by ! g5]ic action ( cosmic law1 = x is a specialis+ ( ! cosmic law :i* c only be effect$ by p]sonal initiative & selection1 j z iron c only be made to float "u c]ta9 specializ$ conditions2 & consequ5tly ! passage f ! ,f\r? into ! ,fif? ,k+dom is a /rictly individual process :i* c only be br\ght ab\t by a p]sonal p]ception ( :at ! normal /&>d ( ! ,new ,individuality really is4 ,?is c only be done by ! active lay+ aside ( ! old race-/&>d & ! consci\s adoption ( ! new "o4 ,! /ud5t w d well to consid] ?is c>efully1 = x expla9s :y ! race _c receive ! fur!r evolution simply z a race2 & also x %[s t our fur!r evolution is n into a /ate ( less activity b ( great]1 n into be+ less alive b m alive1 n into be+ less ourselves b m ourselves2 ?us be+ j ! opposite ( ^? sy/ems :i* pres5t ! goal ( exi/5ce z re-absorption into ! undiff]5tiat$ ,div9e ess5ce4 ,on ! contr>y our fur!r evolution is into great] degrees ( consci\s activity ?an we h ev] yet kn[n1 because x implies our developm5t ( great] p[]s z ! consequ5ce ( our cle>] p]ception ( our true relation to ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s4 ,x is ! recognition t we may1 & %\ld1 measure ourselves by ?is ,new ,/&>d in/ead ( by ! old race-/&>d t con/itutes ! real ,new ,?\ght4 ,! ,new ,?\ght :i* gives ,new ,life to ! individual w nev] be realiz$ s long z we ?9k t x is m]ely ! "n ( a p>ticul> sect1 or t x is to be f\nd 9 ! me*anical obs]vance ( a set ( rules laid d[n = u by "s p>ticul> tea*]4 ,x is a ,new ,fact 9 ! exp]i5ce ( ! individual1 ! reason = :i* is inde$ made cle> to him ?r\gh intellectual p]ception ( ! real nature ( ! ,creative ,process1 b :i* c become an actual exp]i5ce only by habitual p]sonal int]c\rse ) t ,div9e ,_s :i* is ! ,life1 ,love & ,beauty t are at ! back ( ! ,creative ,process & f9d expression ?r\gh x4 ,f ?is int]c\rse new ?\ghts w cont9ually fl[ 91 all ( !m be>+ t vivify+ elem5t :i* is inh]5t 9 _! s\rce1 & ! individual w !n proce$ to "w out ^! new ideas ) ! k t !y h _! orig9 9 ! selection & initiative p[] ( ! ,all-creat+ ,_s itself1 & 9 ?is way by comb9$ m$itation & action he w f9d himself advanc+ into increas+ light1 lib]ty & usefulness4 ,! advance may be almo/ imp]ceptible f "o day to ano!r1 b x w be p]ceptible at long] int]vals1 & ! "o :o is ?us mov+ =w>d ) ! ,_s ( ,god w on look+ back at any "t always f9d t he is gett+ m liv+ness out ( life ?an he 0 a ye> previ\sly4 ,& ?is )\t /r5u\s ef=t1 = he is n hav+ to manufacture ! p[] f 8 own res\rces b only to receive x--& z = us+ x1 t is only ! ex]cise ( ! p[] itself4 ,s foll[+ on ^! l9es y w f9d t ,re/ & ,p[] are id5tical2 & s y get ! real ,new ,?\ght :i* gr[s 9 ,newness e day4 ,,*apt] ,,viii ,,! ,d,,n\em5t ,,( ,,! ,,creative ,,process ,!n comes ! "q1 ,:at %\ld logically be ! dn\em5t ( ! progression we h be5 consid]+8 ,let u briefly recapitulate ! /eps ( ! s]ies4 ,univ]sal ,_s by ,self-contemplation evolves ,univ]sal ,sub/ance4 ,f ?is x produces cosmic creation z ! expression ( itself z function+ 9 ,space & ,"t4 ,!n f ?is initial movem5t x proce$s to m highly specializ$ modes ( ,self-contemplation 9 a cont9ually asc5d+ scale1 = ! simple reason t self-contemplation admits ( no limits & !re=e ea* /age ( self-recognition _c be o!r ?an ! />t+-po9t = a /ill m advanc$ mode ( self-contemplation1 & s on ad inf9itum4 ,?us !re is a cont9u\s progress t[>d m & m highly specializ$ =ms ( life1 imply+ great] lib]ty & wid] scope = enjoym5t z ! capacity ( ! individual life corresponds to a high] degree ( ! contemplation ( ,_s2 & 9 ?is way evolution proce$s till x rea*es a level :]e x becomes impossible to g any fur!r except by ! ex]cise ( consci\s selection & initiative on ! "p ( ! individual1 :ile at ! same "t con=m+ to ! univ]sal pr9ciples ( :i* evolution is ! expression4 ,n[ ask y\rself 9 :at way individual selection & initiative w\ld be likely to act z express+ ! ,orig9at+ ,_s itself8 ,giv5 ! k on ! "p ( ! individual t he is able by 8 p[] ( initiative & selection to draw directly ^u ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s ( ,life1 :at motive c\ld he h = n do+ s8 ,!re=e1 grant$ su* a p]fect recognition1 we %\ld f9d ! individual hold+ precisely ! same place 9 reg>d to 8 own individual _w t ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s does to ! cosmos2 subject only to ! same ,law ( ,love1 ,beauty1 c41 :i* we f\nd to be necess>ily inh]5t 9 ! ,creative ,_s--a simil>ity :i* w\ld entirely prev5t ! individual f ex]cis+ 8 o!rwise limitless p[]s 9 any sort ( antagonism to ! ,_s ( ! ,great ,:ole4 ,at ! same "t ! individual w\ld be q aw>e t he 0 n ! ,univ]sal ,_s 9 propria p]sona1 b t he 0 af=d+ expression to x ?r\gh 8 individuality4 ,n[ ,expression is impossible except ?r\gh ,=m1 & !re=e =m ( "s sort is a necessity ( individuality4 ,x is j "h1 !n1 t we f9d ! importance ( t pr9ciple ( ,h>mony ) ,environm5t ( :i* ,i spoke e>li]1 ! pr9ciple 9 accordance ) :i* a p]son :o _h obta9$ complete control ( matt]1 if he wi%$ to transport himself to "s o!r planet1 w\ld appe> !re 9 p]fect con=mity ) all ! laws ( matt] t obta9$ 9 t _w2 ?\gh1 ( c\rse1 n subject to any limitation ( ! ,life ,pr9ciple 9 himself4 ,he w\ld exhibit ! laws ( matt] z r5d]$ p]fect by ! ,law ( ,orig9at+ ,life4 ,b if any "o n[ liv+ on ?is e>? 7 ?us p]fectly to realize ! ,law ( ,life he w\ld be 9 precisely ! same position "h z our imag9>y visitor to ano!r planet--9 o!r words ! dn\em5t ( ! ,law ( ,life is n ! putt+ (f ( ! body1 b its inclusion z "p ( ! consci\s life ( ! ,_s4 ,?is does n imply any diff]5ce 9 ! molecul> /ructure ( ! body f t ( o!r m51 = by ! pr9ciple ( ,h>mony ( :i* ,i h j spok51 x w\ld be =m$ 9 /rict accordance ) ! laws ( matt] on ! p>ticul> planet2 ?\gh x w\ld n be subject to ! limitations result+ f ! av]age man's non-recognition ( ! p[] ( ! ,_s4 ,! man :o _h ?us fully ent]$ into ! ,fif? ,k+dom w\ld recognize t1 9 its relation to ! d5s] modes ( matt] 8 body 0 ( a simil> d5se mode4 ,t w\ld be its relation to ext]nal environm5t z se5 by o!rs4 ,b s9ce ! man n[ knew himself z n belong+ to ^! d5s] modes ( manife/ation1 b z an individualization ( ,prim>y ,_s1 he w\ld see t relatively to himself all matt] 0 ,prim>y ,sub/ance1 & t f ?is po9t ( view any cond5sations ( t sub/ance into atoms1 molecules1 tissues1 & ! l c\nt$ = no?+--= him ! body w\ld be simply ,prim>y ,sub/ance entirely responsive to 8 w4 ,yet 8 rev]5ce = ! ,law ( ,h>mony w\ld prev5t any disposition to play psy*ic pranks ) x1 & he w\ld use 8 p[] ov] ! body only to meet actual requirem5ts4 ,9 ?is way1 !n1 we are l$ to ! conclusion t et]nal life 9 an immortal physical body is ! logical dn\em5t ( our evolution2 & if we reflect t1 by ! conditions ( ! case1 ! own]s ( su* bodies c\ld at w ei!r transport !mselves to o!r worlds or put (f ! physical body altoge!r & rema9 9 ! purely subjective life :ile /ill reta9+ ! p[] to reclo! !mselves 9 fle% :5ev] !y *ose1 we %all see t ?is dn\em5t ( evolution answ]s all possible que/ions z to ! increase ( ! race1 ! f9al de/ruction ( ! planet1 & ! l4 ,?is1 !n1 is ! ultimate :i* we %\ld keep 9 view2 b ! fact rema9s t1 ?\gh !re may be hidd5 ones :o h ?us atta9$1 ! bulk ( mank9d h n1 & t ! common lot ( humanity is to g ?r\gh ! *ange :i* we call dea?4 ,9 broad philosophical t]ms dea? may be describ$ z ! )drawal ( ! life into ! subjective consci\sness to ! total exclusion ( ! objective consci\sness4 ,!n by ! g5]al law ( ! relation betwe5 subjective & objective m9d1 ! subjective m9d sev]$ f its correspond+ objective m5tality has no means ( acquir+ fre% impressions on its own acc\nt1 & !re=e c only r+ ! *anges on ^? impressions :i* x has br\ght ) x f its pa/ life4 ,b ^! may be ( v v>i\s sorts1 rang+ f ! l[e/ to ! highe/1 f ^? mo/ oppos$ to t ultimate de/9y ( man :i* we h j be5 consid]+1 to ^? :i* recognize 8 possibilities 9 a v l>ge measure1 ne$+ little m to br+ ab\t ! full fruition ( p]fect$ life4 ,b h[ev] v>i\s may be _! exp]i5ces1 all :o h pass$ ?r\gh dea? mu/ h ?is 9 common t !y h lo/ _! physical in/rum5t ( objective p]ception & s h _! mode ( consci\sness det]m9$ entirely by ! dom9ant mode ( sugge/ion :i* !y h br\ght ov] ) !m f ! objective side ( life4#f ,( c\rse if ! objective m5tality 7 also br\ght ov] ?is w\ld give ! individual ! same p[] ( initiative & selection t he possesses :ile 9 ! body1 &1 z we %all see lat] on1 !re are exceptional p]sons ) :om ?is is ! case2 b = ! great majority ! physical bra9 is a necessity = ! work+ ( ! objective m5tality1 & s :5 !y are depriv$ ( ?is in/rum5t _! life becomes purely subjective & is a sort ( dream-life1 only ) a va/ diff]5ce betwe5 two classes ( dream]s--^? :o dream z !y mu/ & ^? :o dream z !y w4 ,! =m] are ^? :o h enslav$ !mselves 9 v>i\s ways to _! l[] m5tality--"s by br++ ) !m ! memory ( crimes unp>don$1 "s by br++ ) !m ! idea ( a m]ely animal life1 o!rs less degrad$1 b /ill 9 bondage to limit$ ?\ght1 br++ ) !m only ! sugge/ion ( a frivol\s worldly life--9 ?is way1 by ! natural op]ation ( ! ,law ( ,sugge/ion1 ^! diff]5t classes1 ei!r ?r\gh remorse1 or unsatisfi$ desires1 or %e] incapacity to grasp high] pr9ciples1 all rema9 e>?-b\nd1 suff]+ 9 exact correspond5ce ) ! nature ( ! sugge/ion !y h br\ght along ) !m4 ,! un*angeable ,law is t ! sugge/ion becomes ! life2 & ?is is equally true ( sugge/ions ( a happi] sort4 ,^? :o h br\ght ov] ) !m ! great tru? t conditions are ! creations ( ?\ght1 & :o h accu/om$ !mselves :ile 9 objective life to dwell on good & beautiful ideas1 are /ill able1 by reason ( be+ imbu$ ) ?is sugge/ion1 to mold ! conditions ( _! consci\sness 9 ! subjective _w 9 accordance ) ! sort ( ideas :i* h become a second nature to !m4 ,)9 ! limits ( ^! ideas ! dom9ant sugge/ion to ^! entities is t ( a ,law :i* conf]s ,lib]ty1 s by us+ ?is ,law ( ! con/ructive p[] ( ?\ght !y c det]m9e ! conditions ( _! own consci\sness2 & ?us in/ead ( be+ compell$ to suff] ! nightm>e dreams ( ! o!r class1 !y c mold _! dream accord+ to _! w4 ,we _c conceive ( su* a life z !irs 9 ! unse5 z o!rwise ?an happy1 nev]!less its range is limit$ by ! range ( ! conceptions !y h br\ght ) !m4 ,^! may be exce$+ly beautiful & ?or\ghly true & logical z f> z !y g2 b !y d n g ! :ole way1 o!rwise ^! spirits w\ld n be 9 ! category :i* we are consid]+ b w\ld belong to t /ill high] class :o fully realize ! ultimate possibilities :i* ! ,law ( ! ,expression ( ,_s provides4 ,! o!rwise happy subjective life ( ^! m enlight5$ s\ls has ?is radical defect t !y h fail$ to br+ ov] ) !m t p[] ( orig9al selection & initiative )\t :i* fur!r progress is impossible4 ,i wi% ! /ud5t to grasp ?is po9t v cle>ly1 = x is ( ! utmo/ importance4 ,( c\rse ! basis ( our fur!r evolution is con=mity to ! h>moni\s nature ( ! ,orig9at+ ,_s2 b ^u ?is f\ndation we ea* h to build up ! sup]/ructure ( our own individuality1 & e /ep ( advance dep5ds on our p]sonal developm5t ( p[] to take t /ep4 ,?is is :at is meant by tak+ an initiative4 ,x is mak+ a ,new ,dep>ture1 n m]ely recomb9+ ! old ?+s into fre% gr\p+s /ill subject to ! old laws1 b introduc+ an entirely new elem5t :i* w br+ its own ,new ,law along ) x4 ,n[ if ?is is ! true mean+ ( initiative !n t is j ! p[] :i* ^! o!rwise happy s\ls d n possess4 ,= by ! v conditions ( ! case !y are liv+ only 9 _! subjective consci\sness1 & consequ5tly are liv+ by ! law ( subjective m9d2 & "o ( ! *ief *>act]i/ics ( subjective m9d is its incapacity to reason inductively1 & !re=e its inability to make ! selection & take ! initiative necess>y to inaugurate a ,new ,dep>ture4 ,! well e/abli%$ facts ( m5tal law %[ conclusively t subjective m9d argues only d$uctively4 ,x argues q correctly f any giv5 premises1 b x _c take ! initiative 9 select+ ! premises--t is ! prov9ce ( inductive reason+ :i* is ess5tially ! function ( ! objective m9d4 ,b by ! law ( ,auto-sugge/ion ?is disc>nate individual has br\ght ov] 8 premises ) him1 :i* premises are ! sum-total ( 8 inductions made dur+ objective life1 ! conception ( ?+s :i* he held at ! "t he pass$ ov]1 = ?is con/itut$ 8 idea ( ,tru?4 ,n[ he _c add to ^! inductions1 = he has p>t$ ) 8 in/rum5t = inductive reason+1 & !re=e 8 d$uctive reason+ 9 ! purely subjective /ate :i* he has n[ ent]$ is necess>ily limit$ to ! consequ5ces :i* may be d$uct$ f ! premises :i* he has br\ght along ) him4 ,9 ! case ( ! highly-develop$ individualities we are n[ consid]+ ! premises ?us br\ght ov] are ( a v f>-rea*+ & beautiful "*1 & consequ5tly ! range ( _! subjective life is correspond+ly wide & beautiful2 b1 nev]!less1 x is subject to ! radical defect t x is deb>r$ f fur!r progress = ! simple reason t ! individual has n br\ght ov] ) him ! m5tal faculty :i* c impress 8 subjective entity ) ! requisite =w>d movem5t = mak+ a new dep>ture into a ,new ,ord]4 ,& moreov]1 ! high] ! subjective developm5t ) :i* ! individual pass$ ov] ! m likely he w be to realize ?is defect4 ,if dur+ e>?-life he _h ga9$ suffici5t k ( ^! ?+s he w c>ry ) him ! k t 8 disc>nate exi/5ce is purely subjective2 & !re=e he w realize t1 h[ev] he may be able to ord] ! pictures ( 8 dream1 yet x is /ill b a dream1 & 9 common ) all o!r dreams lacks ! basis ( solidity f :i* to take really creative action4 ,he kn[s also t ! condition ( o!r disc>nate individualities is simil> to 8 own1 & t consequ5tly ea* "o mu/ necess>ily live 9 a _w ap>t--a _w ( 8 own creation1 because none ( !m possess ! objective m5tality by :i* to direct _! subjective curr5ts s z to make !m p5etrate into ! sph]e ( ano!r subjective entity1 :i* is ! modus op]&i ( telepa?y4 ,?us he is consci\s ( 8 own inability to hold int]c\rse ) o!r p]sonalities2 = ?\gh he may = 8 own pleasure create ! semblance ( !m 9 8 dream-life1 yet he kn[s t ^! are creations ( 8 own m9d1 & t :ile he appe>s to be conv]s+ ) a fri5d amid ! mo/ lovely surr\nd+s ! fri5d himself may be hav+ exp]i5ces ( a v diff]5t description4 ,i am1 ( c\rse1 speak+ n[ ( p]sons :o h pass$ ov] 9 a v high /ate ( developm5t & ) a v consid]able1 ?\gh /ill imp]fect1 k ( ! ,law ( _! own be+4 ,probably ! majority take _! dream-life = an ext]nal reality2 &1 9 any case1 all :o h pass$ ov] )\t c>ry+ _! objective m5tality along ) !m mu/ be %ut up 9 _! individual subjective sph]es & cease to function z c5t]s ( creative p[] s long z !y d n em]ge f t /ate4 ,b ! highly advanc$ individuals ( :om ,i am n[ speak+ h pass$ ov] ) a true k ( ! ,law ( ! relation betwe5 subjective & objective m9d & h !re=e br\ght ) !m a subjective k ( ?is tru?2 & !re=e1 h[ev] o!rwise 9 a c]ta9 s5se happy1 !y mu/ /ill be consci\s ( a fundam5tal limitation :i* prev5ts _! fur!r advance4 ,& ?is consci\sness c produce only "o result1 an ev]-gr[+ long+ = ! removal ( ?is limitation--& ?is repres5ts ! int5se desire ( ! ,_s1 z individualiz$ 9 ^! s\ls1 to atta9 to ! conditions "u :i* x c freely ex]cise its creative p[]4 ,sub-consci\sly ?is is ! desire ( all s\ls1 = x is t cont9ual press+ =w>d ( ! ,_s = manife/ation out ( :i* ! :ole ,creative ,process arises2 & s x is t ! great cry p]petually asc5ds to ,god f all z yet undeliv]$ s\ls1 :e!r 9 or out ( ! body1 = ! deliv]ance :i* !y kn[+ly or unkn[+ly desire4 ,all ?is comes out ( ! well-asc]ta9$ facts ( ! law ( relation betwe5 subjective & objective m9d4 ,!n comes ! "q1 ,is !re no way ( gett+ out ( ?is law8 ,! answ] is t we c nev] get away f univ]sal pr9ciples--b we c specialise !m4 ,we may take x z an axiom t any law :i* appe>s to limit u conta9s 9 itself ! pr9ciple by :i* t limitation c be ov]come1 j z 9 ! case ( ! flotation ( iron4 ,9 ?is axiom1 !n1 we %all f9d ! clue :i* w br+ u out ( ! labyr9?4 ,! same law :i* places v>i\s degrees ( limitation ^u ! s\ls t h pass$ into ! invisible c be s appli$ z to set !m free4 ,we h se5 t ev]y?+ turns on ! obligation ( our subjective "p to act )9 ! limits ( ! sugge/ion :i* has be5 mo/ deeply impress$ ^u x4 ,!n :y n impress ^u x ! sugge/ion t 9 pass+ ov] to ! o!r side x has br\ght its objective m5tality along ) x8 ,if su* a sugge/ion 7 effectively impress$ ^u our subjective m9d1 !n by ! fundam5tal law ( our nature our subjective m9d w\ld act 9 /rict accordance ) ?is sugge/ion1 ) ! result t ! objective m9d w\ld no long] be sep>at$ f x1 & t we %\ld c>ry ) u into ! unse5 our :ole m5tality1 bo? subjective & objective1 & s be able to ex]cise our inductive p[]s ( selection & initiative z well !re z "h4 ,:y n8 ,! answ] is t we _c accept any sugge/ion unless we believe x to be true1 & to believe x to be true we mu/ feel t we h a solid f\ndation = our belief4 ,if1 !n1 we c f9d a suffici5t f\ndation = adequately impress+ ?is sugge/ion ^u ourselves1 !n ! pr9ciples ( m5tal law assure u t we %all c>ry our objective faculty ( initiative & selection into ! unse54 ,!re=e our que/ is to f9d ?is ,f\ndation4 ,!n1 s9ce we _c accept z true :at we believe to be contr>y to ! ultimate law ( ! univ]se1 if we are to f9d su* a f\ndation at all x mu/ be )9 t ,law2 & x is = ?is reason t ,i h laid s mu* /ress ^u ! ,normal ,/&>d ( ,human ,individuality4 ,:5 we are conv9c$ t ?is ideal complet5ess is q normal1 & is a spiritual fact1 n dep5d5t ^u ! body1 b able to control ! body1 !n we h got ! solid basis on :i* to c>ry our objective p]sonality along ) u into ! unse51 & ! well-e/abli%$ laws ( our m5tal con/itution ju/ify ! belief t we c d s4 ,f ^! consid]ations x is obvi\s t ^? :o ?us pass ov] 9 possession ( _! complete m5tality mu/ be 9 a v diff]5t position f ^? :o pass into a condition ( m]ely subjective life1 = !y h br\ght _! p[]s ( selection & initiative ) !m1 & c !re=e employ _! exp]i5ces 9 ! unse5 z a />t+-po9t = /ill fur!r developm5t4 ,s1 !n1 ! "q arises1 ,:at l9es w ?is fur!r developm5t be likely to foll[8 ,we are n[ consid]+ ! case ( p]sons :o h rea*$ a v high degree ( developm5t2 :o h succe$$ 9 s completely unit+ ! subjective & objective portions ( _! spiritual be+ into a p]fect :ole t !y c nev] aga9 be sev]$2 & :o are !re=e able to function ) _! :ole consci\sness on ! spiritual plane4 ,su* p]sons w d\btless be well aw>e t !y h atta9$ ?is degree ( developm5t by ! ,law ( ! ,creative ,process work+ 9 t]ms ( _! own individuality1 & s !y w\ld naturally always ref] to ! orig9al ,cosmic ,creation z ! demon/ration ( ! pr9ciple :i* !y h to specialize = _! own fur!r evolution4 ,!n !y w\ld f9d t ! pr9ciple involv$ is t ( ! manife/ation ( ,_s 9 ,=m2 & !y w\ld fur!r see t ?is manife/ation is n an illusion b a reality1 = ! simple reason t bo? m9d & matt] are equally projections f ! ,great ,orig9at+ ,_s4 ,bo? alike are ?\ghts ( ! ,div9e ,m9d1 & x is impossible to conceive any great] reality ?an ! ,div9e ,?\ght1 or to get at any m sub/antial s\rce ( reality ?an t4 ,ev5 if we 7 to picture ! ,div9e ,m9d z laugh+ at its productions z be+ m]e illusions relatively to itself 7:i* ,i c]ta9ly d n71 /ill ! relation betwe5 ! individual m9d & mat]ial exi/5ce w\ld be a reality = ! individual1 on ! simple ma!matical gr\nd t l signs multipli$ toge!r inv>iably produce a positive result1 ev5 ?\gh ! signs !mselves be negative2 s t1 = u1 at e /age ( our exi/5ce sub/ance mu/ always be z mu* a reality z m9d4 ,!re=e ! manife/ation ( ,_s 9 ,=m is ! et]nal pr9ciple ( ! ,creative ,process :e!r 9 ! evolution ( a _w-sy/em or 9 t ( an individual4 ,b :5 we realize t by ! nature ( ! ,creative ,process sub/ance mu/ be an et]nal v]ity we mu/ n suppose t ?is is true also ( p>ticul> =ms or ( p>ticul> modes ( matt]4 ,sub/ance is a necessity = ! expression ( ,_s1 b x does n foll[ t ,_s is ti$ d[n to any p>ticul> mode ( expression4 ,if y fold a piece ( pap] into ! =m ( a d>t x w fly ?r\gh ! air by ! law ( ! =m :i* y h giv5 x4 ,aga91 if y take ! same bit ( pap] & fold x into ! %ape ( a boat x w float on wat] by ! law ( ! new =m t y h giv5 x4 ,! ?+ =m$ w act 9 accordance ) ! =m giv5 x1 & ! same pap] c be fold$ into diff]5t =ms2 b if !re 7 no pap] y c\ld put x into any %ape at all4 ,! d>t & ! boat are bo? real s long z y reta9 ! pap] 9 ei!r ( ^? %apes2 b ?is does n alt] ! fact t y c *ange ! %apes1 ?\gh y\r p[] to d s dep5ds on ! exi/5ce ( ! pap]4 ,?is is a r\gh analogy ( ! relation betwe5 ultimate sub/ance & p>ticul> =ms1 & %[s u t nei!r sub/ance nor %ape is an illusion2 bo? are ess5tial to ! manife/ation ( ,_s1 only by ! nature ( ! ,creative ,process ! ,_s has p[] to det]m9e :at %ape sub/ance %all take at any p>ticul> "t4 ,accord+ly we f9d ! great ,law t1 z ,_s is ! ,alpha ( ! ,creative ,process1 s solid mat]ial ,=m is its ,omega2 9 o!r words ! ,creative ,s]ies is incomplete until solid mat]ial =m is rea*$4 ,any?+ %ort ( ?is is a condition ( incomplet5ess1 & !re=e ! enlight5$ s\ls :o h pass$ ov] 9 possession ( bo? sides ( _! m5tality w realize t _! condition1 h[ev] beatific1 is /ill "o ( incomplet5ess2 & t :at is want$ = completion is expression ?r\gh a mat]ial body4 ,?is1 !n1 is ! direction 9 :i* su* s\ls w\ld use _! p[]s ( initiative & selection z be+ ! true l9e ( evolution--9 a ^w !y w\ld realize t ! pr9ciple ( ,creative ,progression1 :5 x rea*es ! level ( fully develop$ m5tal man1 necess>ily implies ! ,resurrection ( ! ,body1 & t any?+ %ort ( ?is w\ld be retrogression & n progress4 ,at ! same "t p]sons :o _h pass$ ov] ) ?is k w\ld nev] suppose t ,resurrection meant m]ely ! resuscitation ( ! old body "u ! old conditions2 = !y w\ld see t ! same inh]5t law :i* makes expression 9 concrete sub/ance ! ultimate ( ! creative s]ies also makes ?is ultimate =m dep5d on ! orig9at+ movem5t ( ! _s :i* produces x1 & !re=e t1 al?\gh "s concrete =m is ess5tial = complete manife/ation1 & is a sub/antial reality s long z x is ma9ta9$1 yet ! ma9ta9+ ( ! p>ticul> =m is entirely dep5d5t on ! action ( ! _s ( :i* ! =m is ! ext]nal clo?+4 ,?is resurrection body w\ld !re=e be no m]e illusory _s-%ape1 yet x w\ld n be subject to ! limitations ( matt] z we n[ "k x3 x w\ld be physical matt] /ill1 b entirely subject to ! w ( ! indwell+ _s1 :i* w\ld n reg>d ! d5s] atomic relations ( ! body b only its absolute & ess5tial nature z ,prim>y ,sub/ance4 ,i want ! /ud5t to grasp ! idea t ! same ?+ may be v diff]5t :5 look$ at1 s to say1 f opposite ends ( ! /ick4 ,:at is solid molecul> matt] :5 view$ f ! outside is pla/ic prim>y sub/ance :5 view$ f ! inside4 ,! relations ( ?is new body to any /imulus proce$+ f outside w\ld be ^? ( ! ext]nal laws ( ,nature2 b its relation to ! spiritual ego work+ f )9 w\ld be t ( a pla/ic sub/ance to be mold$ at w4 ,! employm5t ( su* p[] w\ld1 h[ev]1 at all times be bas$ ^u ! rev]5t wor%ip ( ! ,all-creat+ ,_s2 & x w\ld !re=e nev] be ex]cis$ o!rwise ?an 9 accordance ) ! h>moni\s progress ( ! ,creative ,process4 ,proce$+ on ^! l9es ! _s 9 ! individual w\ld /& 9 precisely ! same relation to 8 body t ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s does to ! cosmos4 ,?is1 !n1 is ! sort ( body :i* ! in/ruct$ w\ld contemplate z t 9 :i* he 0 to atta9 resurrection4 ,he w\ld reg>d x1 n z an illusion1 b z a great reality2 :ile at ! same "t he w\ld n ne$ to tr\ble himself ab\t its p>ticul> =m1 = he w\ld "k t x w\ld be ! p]fect expression ( 8 own conception ( himself4 ,he w\ld "k ?is because x is 9 accordance ) ! fundam5tal pr9ciple t ext]nal creation has its root 9 ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s4 ,^? pass+ ov] ) ?is k w\ld obvi\sly be 9 a v diff]5t position f ^? :o pass$ ov] ) only a subjective consci\sness4 ,!y w\ld br+ ) !m p[]s ( selection & initiative by :i* !y c\ld cont9ue to impress fre% & exp&+ conceptions ^u _! subjective m9d1 & s cause x to c>ry on its "w z ! se$-gr\nd ( ! :ole individuality1 in/ead ( be+ %ut up 9 itself z a m]e circulus = ! repetition ( previ\sly receiv$ ideas2 & s 9 _! recognition ( ! pr9ciple ( physical resurrection !y w\ld h a cle> & def9ite l9e ( auto-sugge/ion4 ,& because ?is sugge/ion is d]iv$ f ! und5iable facts ( ! :ole cosmic creation1 x is "o :i* bo? subjective & objective m9d c accept z an e/abli%$ fact1 & s ! sugge/ion becomes effective4 ,?is sugge/ion1 !n1 becomes ! self-contemplation ( ! individual _s2 & because x is 9 /rict con=mity ) ! g5]ic pr9ciple ( ! ,orig9al ,creative ,activity1 ( :i* ! individual m9d is itself a product1 ?is becomes also ! ,self-contemplation ( ! ,orig9at+ ,_s z see+ itself reflect$ 9 ! individual _s2 s t1 by ! basic law ( ! ,creative ,process1 ?is sugge/ion is b\nd soon] or lat] to "w out into its correspond+ fact1 namely1 ! production ( a mat]ial body free f ! p[] ( dea? & f all ^? limitations :i* we n[ associate ) our physical organism4 ,?is1 !n1 is ! hope ( ^? :o pass ov] 9 recognition ( ! great tru?4 ,b h[ ab\t ^? :o h pass$ ov] )\t t recognition8 ,we h se5 t _! purely subjective condition precludes !m f tak+ any initiative on _! own acc\nt1 = t requires ! pres5ce ( objective m9d4 ,_! subjective m9d1 h[ev]1 /ill reta9s its ess5tial nature2 t is1 x is /ill susceptible to sugge/ion1 & /ill possesses its inh]5t creativ5ess 9 work+ out any sugge/ion t is suffici5tly deeply implant$ 9 x4 ,"h1 !n1 op5s up a va/ field ( activity = t o!r class :o h pass$ ov] 9 possession ( bo? sides ( _! m5tality4 ,by means ( _! p[]s ( initiative & selection !y c on ! pr9ciple ( telepa?y cause _! own subjective m9d to p5etrate ! subjective sph]es ( ^? :o d n possess ^? p[]s1 & !y c ?us endeavor to impress ^u !m ! great tru? ( ! physical ultimate ( ! ,creative ,process--! tru? t any s]ies :i* /ops %ort ( t ultimate is incomplete1 &1 if insi/$ ^u z be+ ultimate1 mu/ become self-de/ructive because 9 opposition to ! inh]5t work+ ( ! ,univ]sal ,creative ,_s4 ,!n1 z ! p]ception ( ! true nature ( ! ,creative ,process dawn$ ^u any subjective entity1 x w\ld by reason ( accept+ ?is sugge/ion beg9 to develop an objective m5tality1 & s w\ld gradually atta9 to ! same /atus z ^? :o _h pass$ ov] 9 full possession ( all _! m5tal p[]s4 ,b ! m ! objective m5tality became develop$ 9 ^! disc>nate p]sonalities ! m ! ne$ ( a correspond+ physical in/rum5t w\ld ass]t itself1 bo? f _! intellectual p]ception ( ! orig9al cosmic process1 & also f ! inh]5t en]gy ( ! ,_s z c5t]$ 9 ! ultimate ego ( ! individual4 ,n to seek mat]ial manife/ation w\ld be ! contr>y ( all we h trac$ out reg>d+ ! nature ( ! ,creative ,process2 & h5ce ! law ( t5d5cy result+ f ! consci\s union ( subjective & objective m9d 9 ! individual mu/ necess>ily be t[>d ! production ( a physical =m4 ,only we mu/ recollect1 z ,i h already po9t$ out1 t ?is conc5tration ( ^! m9ds w\ld be ^u a pr9ciple & n ^u a p>ticul> bodily %ape4 ,! p>ticul> =m !y w\ld be cont5t to leave to ! inh]5t self-expressiv5ess ( ! ,univ]sal ,_s work+ ?r\gh ! p>ticul> ego1 ) ! result t _! expectation w\ld be fix$ ^u a g5]al pr9ciple ( physical ,resurrection :i* w\ld provide a =m suit$ to be ! mat]ial in/rum5t ( ! highe/ ideal ( man z a spiritual & m5tal be+4 ,!n1 s9ce ! subjective m9d is ! automatic build] ( ! body1 ! result ( ! individual's acceptance ( ! ,resurrection pr9ciple mu/ be t ?is m5tal conception w ev5tually "w out z a correspond+ fact4 ,:e!r on ?is planet or on "s o!r1 matt]s n1 =1 z we h already se51 ! physical body evolv$ by a s\l t is consci\s ( its unity ) ! ,univ]sal ,_s is b\nd to be 9 con=mity ) ! physical laws ( any planet1 ?\gh f ! /&po9t ( ! consci\s ego n limit$ by !m4 ,9 ?is way we may conceive t ^? :o h pass$ ov] 9 possession ( bo? sides ( _! spiritual nature w\ld f9d a glori\s field ( usefulness 9 ! unse5 9 help+ to emancipate ^? :o _h pass$ ov] 9 possession ( _! subjective side only4 ,b f our pres5t analysis x w be se5 t ?is c only be effect$ on ! basis ( a recognition ( ! pr9ciple ( ! ,resurrection ( ! ,body4 ,ap>t f ! recognition ( ?is pr9ciple ! only possible conception :i* ! disc>nate individual c\ld =m ( himself w\ld be t ( a purely subjective be+2 & ?is c>ries ) x all ! limitations ( a subjective life unbalanc$ by an objective "o2 & s long z ! pr9ciple ( physical resurrection is d5i$1 s long ! life mu/ cont9ue to be m]ely subjective & consequ5tly unprogressive4#g ,b x may be ask$ :y ^? :o h realiz$ ?is great pr9ciple suffici5tly to c>ry _! objective m5tality into ! unse5 /ate are liable to ! *ange :i* we call dea?4 ,! answ] is t ?\gh !y h realiz$ ! g5]al pr9ciple !y h n yet dive/$ !mselves ( c]ta9 conceptions by :i* !y limit x1 & consequ5tly by ! law ( subjective m9d !y c>ry ^? limitations into ! work+ ( ! ,resurrection pr9ciple itself4 ,!y are limit$ by ! race-belief t physical dea? is "u all conditions a necess>y law ( ,nature1 or by ! !ological belief t dea? is ! w ( ,god2 s !n ! "q is :e!r ^! beliefs are well f\nd$4 ,( c\rse appeal is made to univ]sal exp]i5ce1 b x does n foll[ t ! univ]sal exp]i5ce ( ! pa/ is b\nd to be ! univ]sal exp]i5ce ( ! future--! univ]sal exp]i5ce ( ! pa/ 0 t no man _h ev] fl[n across ! ,engli% ,*annel1 yet n[ x has be5 done4 ,:at we h to d1 !re=e1 is n to bo!r ab\t pa/ exp]i5ce1 b to exam9e ! inh]5t nature ( ! ,law ( ,life & see :e!r x does n conta9 possibilities ( fur!r developm5t4 ,& ! fir/ /ep 9 ?is direction is to see :e!r :at we h hi!rto consid]$ limitations ( ! law are really integral p>ts ( ! law itself4 ,! v /atem5t ( ?is "q %[s ! correct answ]2 = h[ c a =ce act+ 9 "o direction be an integral "p ( a =ce act+ 9 ! opposite direction8 ,h[ c ! =ce :i* pulls a ?+ d[n be an integral "p ( ! =ce :i* builds x up8 ,to suppose1 !re=e1 t ! limitations ( ! law are an integral portion ( ! law itself is a r$uctio ad absurdum4 ,= ^! reasons ! argum5t f ! pa/ exp]i5ce ( ! race c\nts = no?+2 & :5 we exam9e ! !ological argum5t we %all f9d t x is only ! old argum5t f pa/ exp]i5ce 9 ano!r dress4 ,x is alleg$ t dea? is ! w ( ,god4 ,h[ d we "k t x is ! w ( ,god8 ,because ! facts prove x s1 is ! ultimate answ] ( all religi\s sy/ems ) "o exception2 s "h we are back aga9 at ! old race-exp]i5ce z ! crit]ion ( tru?4 ,!re=e ! !ological argum5t is no?+ b ! mat]iali/ic argum5t disguis$4 ,x is 9 our m or less consci\s acceptance ( ! mat]iali/ic argum5t1 "u any ( its _m disguises1 t ! limitation ( life is to be f\nd--n 9 ! ,law ( ,life itself2 & if we are to br+ into manife/ation ! inf9ite possibilities lat5t 9 t ,law x c only be by look+ /eadily into ! pr9ciple ( ! ,law & resolutely d5y+ ev]y?+ t opposes x4 ,! ,pr9ciple ( ,life mu/ ( necessity be ,affirmative1 & affirmative ?r\gh\t1 )\t any negative any:]e--if we once realize ?is we %all be able to unmask ! enemy & sil5ce 8 guns4 ,n[ to d ?is is precisely ! "o object ( ! ,bible2 & x does x 9 a ?or\ghly logical mann]1 always lead+ on to ! ultimate result by successive l9ks ( cause & effect4 ,p w tell y t ! ,bible is _! au?ority = say+ t ,dea? is ! w ( ,god2 b ^! are p :o read x c>elessly2 & ultimately ! only reason !y c give y = _! mann] ( int]pret+ ! ,bible is t ! facts prove _! int]pretation to be correct2 s t 9 ! la/ resort y w always f9d y h got back to ! old mat]iali/ic argum5t f pa/ race-exp]i5ce1 :i* logically proves no?+4 ,^! are good well-mean+ p ) a limit$ idea :i* !y read into ! ,bible1 & s limit its promises by mak+ physical dea? an ess5tial prelim9>y to ,resurrection4 ,!y grasp1 ( c\rse1 ! great c5tral idea t ,p]fect$ ,man possesses a joy\s immortal ,life p]meat+ _s1 s\l & body2 b !y relegate x to "s dim & di/ant future1 entirely disconnect$ f ! pres5t law ( our be+1 n see+ t if we are to h et]nal life x mu/ necess>ily be involv$ 9 "s pr9ciple :i* is et]nal1 & !re=e exi/+1 at any rate lat5tly1 at ! pres5t mom5t4 ,h5ce1 ?\gh _! fundam5tal pr9ciple is true1 !y are all ! "t m5tally limit+ x1 ) ! result t !y !mselves create ! conditions !y impose ^u x1 & consequ5tly ! pr9ciple w "w 7z pr9ciples always d7 9 accordance ) ! conditions provid$ = its action4 ,unless1 !re=e1 ?is limit+ belief is entirely eradicat$1 ! individual1 ?\gh realiz+ ! fundam5tal pr9ciple ( ,life1 is b\nd to pass out ( physical exi/5ce2 b on ! o!r h&1 s9ce he does take ! recognition ( ?is fundam5tal pr9ciple ) him1 x is b\nd to be> fruit soon] or lat] 9 a joy\s ,resurrection1 :ile ! int]m$iate /ate c only be a peaceful anticipation ( t supreme ev5t4 ,?is is ! answ] to ! "q :y ^? :o h realiz$ ! great pr9ciple suffici5tly to c>ry _! objective m5tality into ! unse5 _w are /ill liable to physical dea?2 & 9 ! la/ analysis x w be f\nd to resolve itself into ! rema9s ( race belief bas$ ^u pa/ exp]i5ce4 ,^! are !y :o pass ov] 9 sure & c]ta9 hope ( a glori\s ,resurrection--sure & c]ta9 because f\nd$ ^u ! v ,be+ ( ,god ,himself1 t inh]5t ,life ( ! ,all-creat+ ,div9e ,_s :i* is ! p]petual int]action ( ! ,et]nal ,love & ,beauty4 ,!y h grasp$ ! ,life-giv+ ,tru?1 only !y h po/pon$ its op]ation1 because !y h ! fix$ idea t its pres5t fruition is an absolute impossibility4 ,b if we ask ! reason = ?is idea x always comes back to ! old mat]iali/ic argum5t f ! exp]i5ce ( pa/ conditions1 :ile ! :ole nature ( advance is 9 ! op5+ up ( new conditions4 ,& 9 ?is advance ! ,bible is ! pione] book4 ,its :ole purport is to tell u mo/ emphatically t dea? is n ! w ( ,god4 ,9 ! /ory ( ,ed5 ,god is repres5t$ z w>n+ man ( ! poison\s nature ( ! =bidd5 fruit1 :i* is incompatible ) ! idea ( dea? z an ess5tial feature ( man's nature4 ,!n f ! po9t :]e man has tak5 ! poison all ! re/ ( ! ,bible is devot$ to tell+ u h[ to get rid ( x4 ,*ri/1 x tells u1 0 manife/$ to br+ ,life & ,immortality to light--to aboli% dea?--to de/roy ! works ( ! devil1 t is ! dea?-deal+ p[]1 = he t ha? ! p[] ( dea? is ! devil4 ,x is impossible to reconcile ?is life-giv+ conception ( ! ,bible ) ! idea t dea? at any /age or 9 any degree is ! desire ( ,god4 ,let u1 !re=e1 />t ) ! recognition t ?is negative =ce1 :e!r 9 its m9or degrees z disease or 9 its culm9ation z dea?1 is t :i* x is ! w ( ,god to aboli%4 ,?is also is logical2 = if ,god be ! ,univ]sal ,_s ( ,life f9d+ manife/ation 9 individual lives1 h[ c ! desire ( ?is ,_s be to act 9 opposition to its own manife/ation8 ,!re=e ,scripture & common-s5se alike assure u t ! w ( ,god t[>d u is ,life & n dea?4#h ,we may !re=e />t on our que/ = ,life ) ! happy c]ta9ty t ,god is on our side4 ,b p w meet u ) ! objection t ?\gh ,god wills ,life to u1 ,he does n w x j yet1 b only 9 "s dim f>-(f future4 ,h[ d we "k ?is8 ,c]ta9ly n f ! ,bible4 ,9 ! ,bible ,jesus speaks ( two classes ( p]sons :o believe on ,him z ! ,manife/ation or ,individualisation ( ! ,_s ( ,life4 ,he speaks ( ^? :o1 hav+ pass$ ?r\gh dea?1 /ill believe on ,him1 & says t ^! %all live--a future ev5t4 ,& at ! same "t ,he speaks ( ^? :o are liv+ & believe on ,him1 & says t !y %all nev] die--?us contemplat+ ! entire elim9ation ( ! cont+5cy ( dea? 7,john xi4 #be74 ,aga9 ,/4 ,paul expresses 8 wi% n to be unclo!d b to be clo!d ^u1 :i* he c]ta9ly w\ld n h done _h he consid]$ ! latt] alt]native a nons5sical fancy4 ,& 9 ano!r place he expressly /ates t we %all n all die1 b t "s %all be transmut$ into ! ,resurrection body )\t pass+ ?r\gh physical dea?4 ,& if we turn to ! ,old ,te/am5t we f9d two in/ances 9 :i* ?is is said to h actually occurr$1 ^? ( ,eno* & ,elijah4 ,& we may note 9 pass+ t ! ,bible draws our att5tion to c]ta9 facts ab\t ^! two p]sonages :i* are important z /rik+ at ! root ( ! notion t au/]ities ( "s sort are necess>y = ! great atta9m5t4 ,( ,eno* we are expressly told t he 0 ! fa!r ( a l>ge family1 & ( ,elijah t he 0 a man ( l nature ) ourselves--?us %[+ u :at is want$ is n a %utt+ ( ourselves (f f ord9>y human life b su* a cle> realization ( ! ,univ]sal ,pr9ciple1 ( :i* our p]sonal life is ! m or less consci\s manife/ation1 t our commone/ actions w be hall[$ by ! ,div9e ,pres5ce2 & s ! gr& dn\em5t w be only ! natural result ( our daily habit ( walk+ ) ,god4 ,f ! /&-po9t ( ! ,bible1 !re=e1 ! atta9m5t ( physical reg5]ation )\t pass+ ?r\gh dea? is n an impossibility1 nor is x necess>ily relegat$ to "s f> (f future4 ,:atev] any "o else may say to ! contr>y1 ! ,bible contemplates su* a dn\em5t ( human evolution z a pres5t possibility4 ,!n if we argue f ! philosophical /&-po9t we arrive at precisely ! same result4 ,pa/ exp]i5ce proves no?+1 & we mu/ !re=e make a fre% />t by go+ back to ! ,orig9al ,creative action ( ! ,_s ( ,life itself4 ,!n1 if we take ?is z our />t+ po9t1 rememb]+ t at ! /age ( ?is orig9al movem5t !re c be no int]v5tion by a second p[]1 because !re is none1 :y %\ld we m5tally impose any re/riction ^u ! action ( ! ,creative ,p[]8 ,c]ta9ly n by its own ,law ( ,t5d5cy1 = t mu/ always be t[>d full] self-expression2 & s9ce ?is c only take place ?r\gh ! individual1 ! desire ( ! ,_s mu/ always be t[>d ! increas+ ( ! individual life4 ,nor yet f any?+ 9 ! creat$ sub/ance1 = t w\ld ei!r be to suppose ! ,_s creat+ some?+ 9 limitation ( its own ,self-expression1 or else to suppose t ! limit+ sub/ance 0 creat$ by "s o!r p[] work+ aga9/ ! ,_s2 & z ?is w\ld mean a ,duality ( p[]s we %\ld n h rea*$ ! ,orig9at+ ,p[] at all1 & s we might put ,_s & ,sub/ance equally out ( c\rt z bo? be+ m]ely modes ( second>y causation4 ,b if we see t ! ,univ]sal ,sub/ance mu/ be creat$ by emanation f ! ,univ]sal ,_s1 !n we see t no limitation ( ,_s by sub/ance is possible4 ,we may !re=e feel assur$ t no limitation proce$s ei!r f ! w ( ! ,_s or f ! nature ( ,sub/ance4 ,:]e1 !n1 does limitation come f8 ,limit+ conditions are creat$ by ! same p[] :i* creates ev]y?+ else1 namely1 ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s4 ,?is is :y x is s important to realize t ! individual m9d =ms a c5t] f :i* ! self-contemplat+ action ( ,_s is specializ$ 9 t]ms ( ! individual's own mode ( ?9k+1 & !re=e s long z ! individual contemplates negative conditions z be+ ( ! ess5ce ( 8 own p]sonality1 he is 9 effect employ+ ! ,creative ,p[] ( ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s inv]t$ly1 de/ructively in/ead ( con/ructively4 ,! ,law ( ! ,self-contemplation ( ,_s z ! ,creative ,p[] is z true 9 ! microcosm z 9 ! macrocosm1 & s ! individual's contemplation ( himself z subject to ! law ( s9 & dea? keeps him subject to t law1 :ile ! opposite self-contemplation1 ! contemplation ( himself z rejoic+ 9 ! ,life ( ! ,_s1 ! ,p]fect ,law ( ,lib]ty1 mu/ necess>ily produce ! opposite results4 ,:y1 !n1 %\ld n reg5]ation be accompli%$ "h & n[8 ,i c see no reason aga9/ x1 ei!r ,scriptural or philosophical1 except our own difficulty 9 gett+ rid ( ! race-traditions :i* are s deeply emb$d$ 9 our subjective m9ds4 ,to get rid ( ^! we require a firm basis on :i* to receive ! opposite sugge/ion4 ,we ne$ to be conv9c$ t our ideal ( a reg5]at$ self is 9 accord ) ! ,normal ,/&>d ( ,humanity & is )9 ! scope ( ! laws ( ! univ]se4 ,n[ to make cle> to u ! inf9itude ( ! truly ,normal ,/&>d ( ,humanity is ! :ole purpose ( ! ,bible2 & ! ,manife/ation ( ?is ,/&>d is set be=e u 9 ! ,c5tral ,p]sonality ( ! ,scriptures :o is at once ! ,son ( ,god & ! ,son ( ,man--! ,great ,exception1 if y w1 to man z we "k him n[1 b ! ,exception :i* proves ! ,rule4 ,9 proportion z we beg9 to realize ?is we beg9 to introduce into our own life ! action ( t ,p]sonal ,factor on :i* all fur!r developm5t dep5ds2 & :5 our recognition is complete we %all f9d t we also are *ildr5 ( ,god4 ,,*apt] ,,ix ,,conclusion ,we are n[ 9 a position to see ! place occupi$ by ! individual 9 ! ,creative ,ord]4 ,we h f\nd t ! orig9at+ & ma9ta9+ =ce ( ! :ole ,creative ,process is ! ,self-contemplation ( ! ,_s1 & t ?is necess>ily produces a ,reciprocal correspond+ to ! idea embodi$ 9 ! contemplation1 & ?us manife/+ t idea 9 a correlative ,=m4 ,we h f\nd t 9 ?is way ! ext]nalization ( ! idea progresses f ! cond5sation ( ! prim>y nebula to ! production ( human be+s z a race1 & t at ?is po9t ! simple g5]ic reproduction ( ! idea t]m9ates4 ,?is means t up to1 & includ+1 g5us homo1 ! individual1 :e!r plant1 animal1 or man1 is :at x is simply by reason ( race conditions & n by ex]cise ( delib]ate *oice4 ,!n we h se5 t ! next /ep 9 advance mu/ necess>ily be by ! individual becom+ aw>e t he has p[] to mold ! conditions ( 8 own consci\sness & environm5t by ! creative p[] ( 8 ?\ght2 ?us n only enabl+ him to take a consci\s "p 9 8 own fur!r evolution b preclud+ him f evolv+ any fur!r except by ! "r ex]cise ( ?is p[]2 & we h f\nd t ! crux ( ! passage f ! ,f\r? to ! ,fif? ,k+dom is to get p s to und]/& ! nature ( _! creative p[] z n to use x de/ructively4 ,n[ :at we require to see is t ! ,creative ,process has always only "o way ( work+1 & t is by ,reciprocity or ,reflection1 or1 z we might say1 by ! law ( ,action & ,re-action1 ! re-action be+ always equival5t & correspond5t to ! action :i* g5]at$ x4 ,if ?is ,law ( ,reciprocity be grasp$ !n we see h[ ! progress ( ! ,creative ,process mu/ at l5g? result 9 produc+ a be+ :o himself possesses ! p[] ( indep5d5t spiritual initiative & is ?us able to c>ry on ! creative "w f ! /&-po9t ( 8 own individuality4 ,n[ ! great crux is fir/ to get p to see t !y possess ?is p[] at all1 & !n to get !m to use x 9 ! "r direction4 ,:5 our eyes beg9 to op5 to ! tru? t we d possess ?is p[] ! temptation is to ignore ! fact t our p[] ( initiative is itself a product ( ! simil> p[] subsi/+ 9 ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s4 ,if ?is orig9 ( our own creative faculty is left out ( sight we %all fail to recognize ! ,liv+ness ( ! ,great] ,life )9 :i* we live4 ,we %all nev] get ne>] to x ?an :at we may call its g5]ic level1 ! /age at :i* ! ,creative ,p[] is c>eful ( ! type or race b is c>eless ( ! individual2 & s at ?is level we %all nev] pass into ! ,fif? ,k+dom :i* is ! ,k+dom ( ,individuality--we h miss$ ! :ole po9t ( ! transition to ! m advanc$ mode ( be+1 9 :i* ! individual consci\sly functions z a creative c5t]1 because we h no conception ( a ,univ]sal ,p[] t works at any high] level ?an ! g5]ic1 & consequ5tly to rea* a specific p]sonal ex]cise ( creative p[] we %\ld h to conceive ( ourselves z transc5d+ ! ,univ]sal ,law4 ,b if we realize t our own p[] ( creative initiative has its orig9 9 ! simil> faculty ( ! ,all-,orig9at+ ,m9d !n we see t ! way to ma9ta9 ! ,life-giv+ en]gy 9 ourselves is to use our p[] ( spiritual initiative s z to impress ^u ! ,_s ! conception ( ourselves z /&+ relat$ to ,x 9 a specific1 individual1 & p]sonal way t takes u out ( ! m]e category ( g5us homo & gives u a specific spiritual individuality ( our own4 ,?us our m5tal action produces a correspond+ re-action 9 ! m9d ( ! ,_s1 :i* 9 its turn reproduces itself z a special manife/ation ( ! ,life ( ! ,_s 9 u2 & s long z ?is circulation betwe5 ! individual _s & ! ,great ,_s is kept up1 ! individual life w be ma9ta9$1 & w also /r5g!n z ! circulation cont9ues1 = ! reason t ! ,_s1 z ! ,orig9al ,creative ,p[]1 is a ,multiply+ ,=ce1 & ! curr5t s5t into x is return$ multipli$1 j z 9 telegraphy ! feeble curr5t receiv$ f a di/ance at ! end ( a long l9e op]ates to />t a p[]ful batt]y 9 ! receiv+ (fice1 :i* s multiplies ! =ce z to give out a cle> message1 :i* b = ! multiplication ( ! orig9al movem5t c\ld n h be5 done4 ,some?+ l ?is we may picture ! multiply+ t5d5cy ( ! ,orig9at+ ,m9d1 & consequ5tly ! long] ! circulation betwe5 x & ! individual m9d goes on ! /rong] ! latt] becomes2 & ?is process gr[+ habitual becomes at la/ automatic1 ?us produc+ an endless fl[ ( ,life cont9ually exp&+ 9 intellig5ce1 love1 p[] & joy4 ,b we mu/ note c>efully t all ?is c only proce$ f ! individual's recognition t 8 own p[]s are a d]ivative f ! ,all-orig9at+ ,_s1 & t !y c cont9ue to be us$ con/ructively only s long z !y are employ$ 9 h>mony ) ! inh]5t ,=w>d ,movem5t ( ! ,_s4 ,!re=e to insure ?is et]nally fl[+ /ream ( ,life f ! ,univ]sal ,_s into ! individual !re mu/ be no inv]sion 9 ! individual's pres5tation ( himself to ! ,orig9at+ ,p[]3 = ?r\gh ! v same ,law by :i* we seek ,life--! ,life namely1 ( reciprocal action & re-action--e inv]sion we br+ ) u 9 pres5t+ ourselves to ! ,_s is b\nd to be fai?fully reproduc$ 9 a correspond+ re-action1 ?us adult]at+ ! /ream ( ,pure ,life1 & r5d]+ x less life-giv+ 9 proportion to ! ext5t to :i* we inv]t ! action ( ! ,life-pr9ciple2 s t 9 extreme cases ! /ream fl[+ ?r\gh & f ! individual may be r5d]$ absolutely poison\s & deadly1 & ! m s ! great] 8 recognition ( 8 own p]sonal p[] to employ spiritual =ces4 ,! exi/5ce ( ^! negative possibilities 9 ! spiritual _w %\ld nev] be ov]look$1 & !re=e ! ess5tial condition = receiv+ ! ,p]fect ,fulness ( ,life is t we %\ld pres5t ourselves be=e ! ,et]nal ,_s free f e trace ( inv]sion4 ,to d ?is means to pres5t ourselves 9 ! lik5ess ( ! ,div9e ,ideal2 & 9 ?is self-pres5tation ! initiative1 s f> z ! individual is consci\sly conc]n$1 mu/ necess>ily be tak5 by himself4 ,he is to project into ! ,et]nal ,m9d ! conception ( himself z id5tical ) its ,et]nal ,ideal2 & if he c d ?is1 !n by ! ,law ( ! ,creative ,process a return curr5t w fl[ f ! ,et]nal ,m9d reproduc+ ?is image 9 ! individual ) a cont9ually gr[+ p[]4 ,!n ! "q is1 ,h[ are we to d ?is8 ,! answ] is t to take ! initiative = induc+ ?is fl[ ( ,life individually x is a s9e qua non t ! conditions enabl+ u to d s %\ld fir/ be pres5t$ to u univ]sally4 ,?is is 9 accordance ) ! g5]al pr9ciple t we c nev] create a =ce b c only specialize x4 ,only "h ! p[] we are want+ to specialize is ! v ,p[] ( ,specialization itself2 & !re=e1 p>adoxical z x may seem1 :at we require to h %[n u is ! ,univ]sality ( ,specialization4 ,n[ ?is is :at ! ,bible puts be=e u 9 its c5tral figure4 ,tak+ ! ,bible /atem5ts simply & lit]ally !y %[ u ?is unique ,p]sonality z ! ,pr9ciple ( ,humanity1 alike 9 its spiritual orig9 & its mat]ial manife/ation1 c>ri$ to ! logical extreme ( specialization2 :ile at ! same "t1 z ! embodim5t ( ! orig9al pol>ity ( ,_s & ,sub/ance1 ?is ,p]sonality1 h[ev] unique1 is absolutely univ]sal2 s t ! ,bible sets ,jesus ,*ri/ be=e u z ! answ] to ! philosophic problem ( h[ to specialize ! univ]sal1 :ile at ! same "t pres]v+ its univ]sality4 ,if1 !n1 we fix our ?\ght ^u ?is unique ,p]sonality z ! embodim5t ( univ]sal pr9ciples1 x foll[s t ^? pr9ciples mu/ exi/ 9 ourselves also1 & t ,8 actual specialization ( !m is ! e>ne/ ( our pot5tial specialization ( !m4 ,!n if we fix our ?\ght on ?is pot5tial 9 ourselves z be+ id5tical ) its manife/ation 9 ,him1 we c logically claim our id5tity ) ,him1 s t :at ,he has done we h done1 :at ,he is1 we are1 & ?us recogniz+ ourselves 9 ,him we pres5t ?is image ( ourselves to ! ,et]nal ,m9d1 ) ! result t we br+ ) u no inv]sion1 & s import no negative curr5t into our /ream ( ,life4 ,?us x is t we rea* ! ,fa!r ?r\gh ! ,son1 & t ,he is able to keep u f fall+ & to pres5t u faultless be=e ! pres5ce ( ! ,div9e glory ) exce$+ joy 7,jude #bd74 ,! ,gospel ( ! ,^w made fle% is n ! mean+less cant ( "s petty sect nor yet ! cunn+ device ( prie/craft1 ?\gh x has be5 di/ort$ 9 bo? ^! directions2 b x c give a reason = itself1 & is f\nd$ ^u ! deepe/ laws ( ! ?reefold con/itution ( man1 embrac+ ! :ole man1 body1 s\l & _s4 ,x is n oppos$ to ,sci5ce b is ! culm9ation ( all sci5ce :e!r physical or m5tal4 ,x is philosophical & logical ?r\gh\t if y />t ! ,creative ,process :]e alone x c />t1 9 ! ,self-contemplation ( ! ,_s4 ,! m c>efully we exam9e into ! claims ( ! ,gospel ( ,*ri/ ! m we %all f9d all ! curr5t objections to x melt away & disclose _! own sup]ficialness4 ,we %all f9d t ,*ri/ is inde$ ! ,m$iator betwe5 ,god & ,man1 n by ! arbitr>y fiat ( a caprici\s ,deity1 b by a logical law ( sequ5ce :i* solves ! problem ( mak+ extremes meet1 s t ! ,son ( ,man is also ! ,son ( ,god2 & :5 we see ! reason :y ?is is s we !reby receive p[] to become ourselves sons ( ,god1 :i* is ! dn\em5t ( ! ,creative ,process 9 ! ,individual4 ,^! clos+ l9es are n ! place to ent] ^u s great a subject1 b ,i hope to foll[ x up 9 ano!r volume & to %[ 9 detail ! logic ( ! ,bible tea*+1 :at x saves u f & :at x leads u to2 to %[ :ile giv+ due weight to ! value ( o!r sy/ems h[ x diff]s f !m & transc5ds !m2 to glance1 p]haps1 = a mom5t at ! indications ( ! future & to t\* ^u "s ( ! dang]s ( ! pres5t & ! way to escape f !m4 ,nor w\ld ,i pass ov] 9 sil5ce ano!r & important aspect ( ! ,gospel conta9$ 9 ,*ri/'s commission to ,8 foll[]s to heal ! sick4 ,?is also foll[s logically f ! ,law ( ! ,creative ,process if we trace c>efully ! sequ5ce ( connections f ! indwell+ ,ego to ! out]mo/ ( its vehicles2 :ile ! effect ( ! recognition ( ^! great tru?s ^u ! individuality t has = a "t put (f its robe ( fle%1 op5s out a subject ( p>am\nt int]e/4 ,?us x is t on e plane ,*ri/ is ! ,fulfill+ ( ! ,law1 & t ,salvation is n a silly %ibole? b ! logical & vital process ( our advance into ! unfoldm5t ( ! next /age ( ! limitless capacities ( our be+4 ,( ^! ?+s ,i hope to write 9 ano!r volume1 %\ld x be p]mitt$ to me1 & 9 ! mean:ile ,i w\ld comm5d ! pres5t ab/ract /atem5t ( pr9ciples to ! read]'s att5tion 9 ! hope t x may ?r[ "s light on ! fundam5tal nature ( ^! mom5t\s que/ions4 ,! great ?+ to be> 9 m9d is t if a ?+ is true at all !re mu/ be a reason :y x is true1 & :5 we come to see ?is reason we "k ! tru? at fir/ h& = ourselves & n f "s "o else's report--!n x becomes really our own & we beg9 to le>n h[ to use x4 ,?is is ! secret ( ! individual's progress 9 any art1 sci5ce1 or bus9ess1 & ! same me?od w s]ve equally well 9 our se>* aft] ,life itself1 & z we ?us foll[ up ! great que/ we %all f9d t on e plane ! ,way1 ! ,tru?1 & ! ,life are ,,"o4 ,a little philosophy incl9e? a man's m9d to a!ism1 b dep? 9 philosophy br+e? m5's m9ds ab\t to religion4--,bacon4 ,essay xvi4 ,,*apt] ,x ,,! ,,div9e ,,(f]+ ,i take ! pres5t opportunity ( a new edition to add a few pages on c]ta9 po9ts :i* appe> to me ( vital importance1 & ! connection ( :i* ) ! prec$+ *apt]s w1 ,i hope1 become evid5t z ! read] proce$s4 ,assum+ ! exi/5ce 9 ea* individual ( a creative p[] ( ?\ght :i*1 9 relation to himself1 reflects ! same p[] exi/+ 9 ! ,univ]sal ,m9d1 our "r employm5t ( ?is p[] becomes a matt] ( extreme mom5t to ourselves4 ,its inv]t$ use necess>ily holds u fa/ 9 ! bondage f :i* we are seek+ to escape1 & equally necess>ily its "r use br+s u into ,lib]ty2 & !re=e if any ,div9e revelation exi/s at all its purpose mu/ be to lead u away f ! inv]t$ use ( our creative faculty & into su* a high] specializ+ ( x z w produce ! desir$ result4 ,n[ ! purpose ( ! ,bible is to d ?is1 & x seeks to effect ?is "w by a dual op]ation4 ,x places be=e u t ,div9e ,ideal ( :i* ,i h already spok51 & at ! same "t bases ?is ideal ^u ! recognition ( a ,div9e ,sacrifice4 ,^! two conceptions are s intimately int]wov5 9 ,scripture t !y _c be sep>at$1 b at ! pres5t day !re is a gr[+ t5d5cy to attempt to make ?is sep>ation & to disc>d ! conception ( a ,div9e ,sacrifice z unphilosophical1 t is z hav+ no nexus ( cause & effect4 ,:at ,i want1 !re=e1 to po9t out 9 ^! additional pages is t !re is su* a nexus1 & t s f> f be+ )\t a sequ5ce ( cause & effect x has its root 9 ! inn]mo/ pr9ciples ( our own be+4 ,x is n contr>y to ,law b proce$s f ! v nature ( ! ,law itself4 ,! curr5t objection to ! ,bible tea*+ on ?is subject is t no su* sacrifice c\ld h be5 requir$ by ,god1 ei!r because ! ,orig9at+ ,en]gy c h no consci\sness ( ,p]sonality & is only a bl9d =ce1 or because1 if ,god is ,love1 ,he c\ld n dem& su* a sacrifice4 ,on ! =m] hypo!sis we are ( c\rse away f ! ,bible tea*+ altoge!r & h no?+ to d ) x2 b1 z ,i h said else:]e1 ! fact ( our own consci\sness ( p]sonality c only be acc\nt$ = by ! exi/5ce1 h[ev] hidd51 ( a correspond+ quality 9 ! ,orig9at+ ,_s4 ,!re=e ,i w conf9e my rem>ks to ! "q h[ ,love1 z ! orig9at+ impulse ( all creation1 c dem& su* a sacrifice4 ,& to my m9d ! answ] is t ,god does n dem& x4 ,x is ,man :o dem&s x4 ,x is ! in/9ctive crav+ ( ! human s\l = c]ta9ty t requires a demon/ration s conv9c+ z to leave no room = d\bt ( our p]fectly happy relation to ! ,supreme ,_s1 & consequ5tly to all t fl[s f x1 :e!r on ! side ( ! visible or ( ! invisible4 ,:5 we grasp ! fact t su* a /&po9t ( c]ta9ty is ! necess>y f\ndation = ! build+ up 9 ourselves ( ! ,div9e ,ideal !n x becomes cle> t to af=d u ?is firm basis is ! greate/ "w t ! ,_s1 9 its relation to human p]sonality1 c\ld d4 ,we are (t5 told t ! (f]+ ( sacrifices _h its orig9 9 primitive man's conception ( 8 gods z be+s :i* requir$ to be propitiat$ s z to induce !m to d good or ab/a9 f do+ h>m2 & v likely ?is 0 ! case4 ,! tru? at ! back ( ?is conception is ! feel+ t !re is a high] p[] ^u :i* man is dep5d5t2 & ! error is 9 suppos+ t ?is p[] is limit$ by an individuality :i* c be enri*$ by sell+ its good (fices1 or :i* blackmails y by ?reats4 ,9 ei!r case x wants to get some?+ out ( y1 & f ?is x foll[s t its own p[] ( supply+ its own wants mu/ be limit$1 o!rwise x w\ld n require to be kept 9 good temp] by gifts4 ,9 v undevelop$ m9ds su* a conception results 9 ! idea ( num]\s gods1 ea* hav+1 s to say1 8 own p>ticul> l9e ( bus9ess2 & ! fur!/ advance ?is mode ( ?\ght is capable ( is ! r$uction ( ^! v>i\s deities to two antagoni/ic p[]s ( ,good & ( ,evil4 ,b ! result 9 ei!r case is ! same1 s long z we />t ) ! hypo!sis t ! ,good w d u m good & ! ,evil d u less h>m by reason ( our sacrifices1 = !n x logically foll[s t ! m valuable y\r sacrifices & ! (t5] !y are pres5t$ ! bett] *ance y h ( good luck4 ,d\btless "s su* conception z ?is 0 held by ! mass ( ! ,hebrew p "u ! sacrificial sy/em ( ! ,levitical ,law1 & p]haps ?is 0 "o reason :y !y 7 s prone to fall into idolatry--= 9 ?is view _! fundam5tal notion 0 practically id5tical 9 its nature ) t ( ! hea!n ar\nd !m4 ,( c\rse ?is 0 n ! fundam5tal idea embodi$ 9 ! ,levitical sy/em itself4 ,! root ( t sy/em 0 ! symboliz+ ( a supreme ideal ( reconciliation h]eaft] to be manife/$ 9 action4 ,n[ a symbol is n ! ?+ symboliz$4 ,! purpose ( a symbol is tw(old1 to put u ^u enquiry z to ! reality :i* x indicates1 & to br+ t reality to our m9ds by sugge/ion :5 we look at ! symbol2 b if x does n d ?is1 & we re/ only 9 ! symbol1 no?+ w come ( x1 & we are left j :]e we 74 ,t ! symbolic nature ( ! ,levitical sacrifice 0 cle>ly p]ceiv$ by ! deep] ?9k]s among ! ,hebrews is atte/$ by _m passages 9 ! ,bible--,sacrifice & burnt (f]+ ?\ w\lde/ n 7,psalms xl3 #f1 & li3 #af7 & o!r simil> utt]ances2 & ! di/9ction betwe5 ^! symbols & t :i* !y symboliz$ is br\ght out 9 ! ,epi/le to ! ,hebrews by ! argum5t t if ^? sacrifices _h af=d$ a suffici5t /&po9t = ! effectual realization ( cleans+ !n ! wor%ip] w\ld n ne$ to h repeat$ !m because he w\ld h no m consci\sness ( s9 7,hebrews x3 #b74 ,?is br+s u to ! ess5tial po9t ( ! :ole matt]4 ,:at we want is ! c]ta9ty t !re is no long] any sep>ation betwe5 u & ! ,div9e ,_s by reason ( s91 ei!r z ov]t acts ( wrong do+ or z error ( pr9ciple2 & ! :ole purpose ( ! ,bible is to lead u to ?is assurance4 ,n[ su* an assurance _c be bas$ on any sort ( sacrifices t require repetition1 = !n we c\ld nev] "k :e!r we _h giv5 en\gh ei!r 9 quality or quantity4 ,x mu/ be a once-=-all bus9ess or x is no use at all2 & s ! ,bible makes ! once-=-allness ( ! (f]+ ! ess5tial po9t ( its tea*+4 ,he t has be5 ba!d does n ne$ to be ba!d aga9 7,john xiii3 #aj74 ,!re is n[ no condemnation to !m :i* are 9 ,*ri/ ,jesus 7,romans viii3 i74 ,v>i\s intellectual difficulties1 h[ev]1 h9d] _m p f see+ ! work+ ( ! law ( cause & effect 9 ?is pres5tm5t4 ,"o is ! "q1 ,h[ c moral guilt be transf]r$ f "o p]son to ano!r8 ,:at is call$ ! =5sic argum5t 7i4e41 ! c\rt ( law argum5t7 t ,*ri/ und]took to suff] 9 our /ead z our surety is und\bt$ly op5 to ?is objection4 ,surety%ip mu/ by its v nature be conf9$ to civil obligations & _c be ext5d$ to crim9al liability1 & s ! =5sic argum5t may be set aside z v mu* a legal fiction4 ,b if we realize ! ,bible tea*+ t ,*ri/ is ! ,son ( ,god1 t is1 ! ,div9e ,pr9ciple ( ,humanity out ( :i* we orig9at$ & subsi/+ 9 u all1 h[ev] unconsci\sly to ourselves1 !n we see t s9n]s z well z sa9ts are includ$ 9 ?is ,pr9ciple2 & consequ5tly t ! ,self-(f]+ ( ,*ri/ mu/ actually include ! self-(f]+ ( e human be+ 9 ! ackn[l$gm5t 7h[ev] unkn[n to 8 objective m5tality7 ( 8 s94 ,if we c grasp ?is some:at ab/ract po9t ( view x foll[s t 9 ! ,p]son ( ,*ri/ e human be+1 pa/1 pres5t1 & to come1 0 self-(f]$ = ! condemnation ( 8 s9--a self- condemnation & a self-(f]+1 & h5ce a cleans+1 = ! simple reason t if y c get a man to realize 8 pa/ error1 really see 8 mi/ake1 he won't d x aga92 & x is ! p]petuation ( s9 & error t has to be got rid (--to d ?is univ]sally w\ld be to rega9 ,p>adise4 ,se5 !re=e 9 ?is light !re is no "q ( transf]5ce ( moral guilt1 & ,i take x ?is is ,/4 ,paul's mean+ :5 he speaks ( our be+ p>tak]s 9 ,*ri/'s dea?4 ,!n !re is ! objection1 ,h[ c pa/ s9s be done away )8 ,if we accept ! philosophical conclusion t ,"t has no sub/antive exi/5ce !n all t rema9s is /ates ( consci\sness4 ,z ,i h said 9 ! e>li] "p ( ?is book1 ! ,self-,contemplation ( ,_s is ! cause ( all our p]ception ( exi/5ce & environm5t2 & consequ5tly if ! ,self-,contemplation ( ! ,_s f any c5t] ( individualization is t ( entire h>mony & ! abs5ce ( any?+ t w\ld cause any consci\sness ( sep>ation1 !n pa/ s9s cease to h any "p 9 ?is self-recognition1 & consequ5tly cease to h any place 9 ! _w ( exi/5ce4 ,! f\ndation ( ! :ole creative process is ! call+ into ,light out ( ,d>kness--t :i* makes manife/ is light--& consequ5tly ! conv]se action is t ( s5d+ out ( ,light into ,d>kness1 t is1 into ,notbe+4 ,n[ ?is is exactly :at ! ,_s says 9 ! ,bible--,i1 ev5 ,i1 am ,he t blotte? out ?y transgressions 7,isaiah xliii3 #be74 ,blott+ out is ! s5d+ out ( manife/ation into ! d>kness ( non-manife/ation1 out ( ,be+ into ,n-be+2 & 9 ?is way ! pa/ error ceases to h any exi/5ce & s ceases to h any fur!r effect ^u u4 ,x is blott$ out1 & f ?is new /&po9t has nev] be5 at all2 s t to cont9ue to contemplate x is to give a false s5se ( exi/5ce to t :i* 9 effect has no exi/5ce4 ,x is t ,affirmation ( ,negation :i* is ! root ( all evil4 ,x is ! inv]sion ( our ,god-giv5 creative p[] ( ?\ght1 call+ into exi/5ce t :i* 9 ! ,p]fect ,life ( ! ,_s nev] _h or c\ld h any exi/5ce1 & !re=e x creates ! s5se ( inh>mony1 opposition1 & sep>ation4 ,( c\rse ?is is only relatively to ourselves1 = we _c create et]nal pr9ciples4 ,!y are ! ,be+ ( ,god2 & z ,i h already %[n ^! great ,pr9ciples ( ! ,affirmative may be summ$ up 9 ! two words ,love & ,beauty--,love 9 ess5ce & ,beauty 9 manife/ation2 b s9ce we c only live f ! /&po9t ( our own consci\sness we c make a false creation built ^u ! idea ( opposites to ! all-creat+ ,love & ,beauty1 :i* false creation ) all its accompanim5ts ( limitation1 s91 sorr[1 sickness1 & dea?1 mu/ necess>ily be real to u until we p]ceive t ^! ?+s 7 n creat$ by ,god1 ! ,_s ( ! ,affirmative1 b by our own inv]sion ( our true relation to ! ,all-creat+ ,be+4 ,:51 !n1 we view ! matt] 9 ?is light ! ,(f]+ once = all ( ! ,div9e ,sacrifice = ! s9 ( ! :ole _w is se5 n to be a m]e ecclesia/ical dogma hav+ no relation ( cause & effect1 b to be ! highe/ application ( ! same pr9ciple ( cause & effect by :i* ! :ole creation1 ourselves includ$1 has be5 br\ght into exi/5ce-- ! ,self-,contemplation ( ,_s produc+ correspond+ manife/ation1 only n[ work+ on ! level ( ,individual ,p]sonality4 ,z ,i h %[n at ! beg9n+ ( ?is book ! cosmic manife/ation ( pr9ciples is n suffici5t to br+ out all t !re is 9 !m4 ,to d ?is _! action mu/ be specializ$ by ! introduction ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor4 ,!y are repres5t$ by ! ,pill> ,ja*91 b x mu/ be equilibriat$ by ! ,pill> ,boaz1 ,law & ,p]sonality ! two ,pill>s ( ! ,univ]se2 & 9 ! ,"o ,(f]+ we h ! supreme comb9ation ( ^! two pr9ciples1 ! highe/ specialization ( ,law by ! highe/ p[] ( ,p]sonality4 ,^! are et]nal pr9ciples1 & !re=e we are told t ! ,lamb 0 sla9 f ! f\ndation ( ! _w2 & because ?\ghts are ?+s ?is supreme manife/ation ( ! creative int]action ( ,law & ,p]sonality 0 b\nd ev5tually to be manife/$ 9 concrete action 9 ! _w condition$ by "t & space2 & s x 0 t ! supreme manife/ation ( ! ,love ( ,god to meet ! supreme ne$ ( ,man took place4 ,! hi/ory ( ! ,jewi% nation is ! hi/ory ( ! work+ ( ! law ( cause & effect1 "u ! guidance ( ! ,div9e ,wisdom1 s z to provide ! necess>y conditions = ! greate/ ev5t 9 ! _w's hi/ory2 = if ,*ri/ 0 to appe> x mu/ be 9 "s nation1 9 "s place1 & at "s "t3 b to trace ! /eps by :i*1 ?r\gh an intelligible sequ5ce ( causes1 ^! necess>y conditions 7 provid$ belongs r to an inve/igation ( ,bible hi/ory ?an to our pres5t purpose1 s ,i w n ent] into ^! details "h4 ,b :at ,i hope ,i h 9 "s measure made cle> is t !re is a reason :y ,*ri/ %\ld be manife/$1 & %\ld suff]1 & rise aga91 & t s f> f be+ a baseless sup]/ition ! ,reconcil+ ( ! _w to ,god ?r\gh ! ,"o ,(f]+ once-=-all (f]$ = ! s9 ( ! :ole _w1 lays ! immovable f\ndation ^u :i* we may build securely = all ! illimitable future4 ,,*apt] ,,xi ,,ourselves ,,9 ,,! ,,div9e ,,(f]+ ,if we h grasp$ ! pr9ciple ,i h endeavor$ to /ate 9 ! la/ *apt] we %all f9d t ) ?is new /&po9t a new life & a new _w beg9 to op5 out to u4 ,?is is because we are n[ liv+ f a new recognition ( ourselves & ( ,god4 ,et]nal ,tru?1 t :i* is ! ess5tial reality ( ,be+1 is always ! same2 x has nev] alt]$1 = :atev] is capable ( pass+ away & giv+ place to some?+ else is n et]nal1 & !re=e ! real ess5ce ( our be+1 z proce$+ f ,god & subsi/+ 9 ,him has always be5 ! same4 ,b ?is is ! v fact :i* we h hi!rto lo/ sight (2 & s9ce our p]ception ( life is ! measure ( our individual consci\sness ( x1 we h impos$ ^u ourselves a _w ( limitation1 a _w fill$ ) ! p[] ( ! negative1 because we h view$ ?+s f t /&po9t4 ,:at takes place1 !re=e1 :5 we realize ! tru? ( our ,r$emption is n a *ange 9 our ess5tial relation to ! ,p>5t ,_s1 ! ,et]nal ,fa!r1 b an awak5+ to ! p]ception ( ?is et]nal & absolutely p]fect relation4 ,we see t 9 reality x has nev] be5 o!rwise = ! simple reason t 9 ! v nature ( ,be+ x c\ld n be o!rwise2 & :5 we see ?is we see also t :at has hi!rto be5 wrong has n be5 ! work+ ( ! ,fa!r b our conception ( ! exi/5ce ( "s o!r p[]1 a p[] ( negation1 limitation1 & de/ructiv5ess1 ! v opposite to all t ! ,creative ,_s1 by ! v fact ( ,its ,creativ5ess1 mu/ be4 ,t wond]ful p>able ( ! ,prodigal ,son %[s u t he nev] ceas$ to be a son4 ,x 0 n 8 ,fa!r :o s5t him away f home b 8 notion t he c\ld d bett] on 8 own1 & we all "k :at came ( x4 ,b :5 he return$ to ! ,fa!r he f\nd t f ! ,fa!r's po9t ( view he _h nev] be5 o!rwise ?an a son1 & t all ! tr\ble he _h gone ?r\gh 0 n ( ! ,fa!r b 0 ! result ( 8 own failure to realize :at ! ,fa!r & ! ,home really 74#i ,n[ ?is is exactly ! case ) ourselves4 ,:5 we wake up to ! tru? we f9d t1 s f> z ! ,fa!r is conc]n$1 we h always be5 9 ,him & 9 ,8 home1 = we are made 9 ,8 image & lik5ess & are reflections ( ,8 own ,be+4 ,he says to u ,son1 ?\ art ev] ) me & all t ,i h is ?9e4 ,! ,self-,contemplation ( ,_s is ! ,creative ,p[] creat+ an environm5t correspond+ to ! mode ( consci\sness contemplat$1 & !re=e 9 proportion z we contemplate ourselves z c5t]s ( individualization = ! ,div9e ,_s we f9d ourselves surr\nd$ by a new environm5t reflect+ ! h>moni\s conditions :i* preexi/ 9 ! ,?\ght ( ! ,_s4 ,?is1 !n1 is ! sequ5ce ( ,cause & ,effect involv$ 9 ! tea*+ ( ! ,bible4 ,man is 9 ess5ce a spiritual be+1 ! reflection on ! plane ( individual p]sonality ( t :i* ! ,all-,orig9at+ ,_s is 9 ,itself1 & is ?us 9 t reciprocal relation to ! ,_s :i* is ,love4 ,?is is ! fir/ /atem5t ( 8 creation 9 ,g5esis--,god saw all t ,he _h made & behold x 0 v good1 ,man includ$4 ,!n ! ,fall is ! failure ( ! l[] m5tality to realize t ,god ,,is ,love1 9 a ^w t ,love is ! only ultimate ,motive ,p[] x is possible to conceive1 & t ! creations ( ,love _c be o!rwise ?an good & beautiful4 ,! l[] m5tality conceives an opposite quality ( ,evil & ?us produces a motive p[] ! opposite ( ,love1 :i* is ,fe>2 & s ,fe> is born into ! _w giv+ rise to ! :ole brood ( evil1 ang]1 hatr$1 envy1 lies1 viol5ce1 & ! l1 & on ! ext]nal plane giv+ rise to discordant vibrations :i* are ! root ( physical ill4 ,if we analyze our motives we %all f9d t !y are always "s mode ei!r ( ,love or ,fe>2 & fe> has its root 9 ! recognition ( "s p[] o!r ?an ,p]fect ,love1 :i* is ,god ! ,,"o all-embrac+ ,good4 ,fe> has a creative =ce :i* inv]t$ly mimics t ( ,love2 b ! diff]5ce betwe5 !m is t ,love is et]nal & ,fe> is n4 ,love z ! ,orig9al ,creative ,motive is ! only logical conclusion we c come to z to :y we ourselves or any o!r creation exi/s4 ,fe> is illogical because to reg>d x z hav+ any place 9 ! ,orig9al ,creative ,motive involves a contradiction 9 t]ms4 ,by accept+ ! notion ( a dual p[]1 t ( ,good & ,evil1 ! inv]t$ creative work+ ( ,fe> is introduc$ ) all its att5dant tra9 ( evil ?+s4 ,?is is ! eat+ ( ! deadly tree :i* occasions ! ,fall1 & !re=e ! ,r$emption :i* requires to be accompli%$ is a r$emption f ,fe>--n m]ely f ?is or t p>ticul> fe> b f ! v ,root ( ,fe>1 :i* root is unbelief 9 ! ,love ( ,god1 ! refusal to believe t ,love alone is ! ,creat+ ,p[] 9 all ?+s1 :e!r small beyond our recognition or great beyond our conception4 ,!re=e to br+ ab\t ?is ,r$emption !re mu/ be su* a manife/ation ( ! ,div9e ,love to ,man z1 :5 rightly appreh5d$1 w leave no gr\nd = fe>2 & :5 we see t ! ,sacrifice ( ! ,cross 0 ! ,self-,(f]+ ( ,love made 9 ord] to provide ?is manife/ation1 !n we see t all ! l9ks 9 ! *a9 ( ,cause & ,effect are complete1 & t ,fe> nev] _h any place 9 ! ,creative ,pr9ciple1 :e!r z act+ 9 ! creation ( a _w or ( a man4 ,! root1 !re=e1 ( all ! tr\ble ( ! _w consi/s 9 ! ,affirmation ( ,negation1 9 us+ our creative p[] ( ?\ght inv]t$ly1 & ?us giv+ sub/ance to t :i* z pr9ciple has no exi/5ce4 ,s long z ?is negative action ( ?\ght cont9ues s long w x produce its natural effect2 :e!r 9 ! individual or 9 ! mass4 ,! exp]i5ce is p]fectly real :ile x la/s4 ,its unreality consi/s 9 ! fact t !re 0 nev] any real ne$ = x2 & ! m we grasp ! tru? ( ! all-embrac+ness ( ! ,,"o ,good1 bo? z ,cause & z ,effect1 on all planes1 ! m ! exp]i5ce ( its opposite w cease to h any place 9 our lives4 ,?is truly ,new ,?\ght puts u 9 an entirely new relation to ! :ole ( our environm5t1 op5+ out possibilities hi!rto undreamt (1 & ?is by an ord]ly sequ5ce ( law :i* is naturally involv$ 9 our new m5tal attitude2 b be=e consid]+ ! prospect ?us (f]$ x is well to be q cle> z to :at ?is new m5tal attitude really is2 = x is our adoption ( ?is attitude t is ! ,key to ! :ole position4 ,put briefly x is ceas+ to include ! idea ( limitations 9 our conception ( ! work+ ( ! ,all-,creat+ ,_s4 ,"h are "s specim5s ( ! way 9 :i* we limit ! creative work+ ( ! ,_s4 ,we say1 ,i am too old n[ to />t ?is or t new sort ( "w4 ,?is is to d5y ! p[] ( ! ,_s to vivify our physical or m5tal faculties1 :i* is illogical if we consid] t x is ! same ,_s t br\ght u into any exi/5ce at all4 ,x is l say+ t :5 a lamp is beg9n+ to burn l[ ! same p]son :o fir/ fill$ x ) oil _c repl5i% x & make x burn brightly aga94 ,or we say1 ,i _c d s & s because ,i h n ! means4 ,:5 y 7 f\rte5 did y "k :]e all ! means 7 com+ f :i* 7 go+ to support y till n[ :5 y are p]haps =ty or fifty8 ,s y %\ld argue t ! same p[] t has work$ 9 ! pa/ c cont9ue to "w 9 ! future4 ,if y say ! means came 9 ! pa/ q naturally ?r\gh ord9>y *annels1 t is no objection2 on ! contr>y ! m reason = say+ t suitable *annels w op5 9 ! future4 ,d y expect ,god to put ca% into y\r desk by a conjur+ trick8 ,means come ?r\gh recognizable *annels1 t is to say we recognize ! *annels by ! fact ( ! /ream fl[+ ?r\gh !m2 & "o ( our mo/ common mi/akes is 9 ?9k+ t we ourselves h to fix ! p>ticul> *annel be=eh&4 ,we say 9 effect t ! ,_s _c op5 o!r *annels1 & s we /op !m up4 ,or we say1 our pa/ exp]i5ce speaks to ! contr>y1 ?us assum+ t our pa/ exp]i5ces h includ$ all possibilities & h exhau/$ ! laws ( ! univ]se1 an assumption :i* is negativ$ by e fre% discov]y ev5 9 physical sci5ce4 ,& s we g on limit+ ! p[] ( ! ,_s 9 a hundr$ diff]5t ways4 ,b c>eful consid]ation w %[ t1 ?\gh ! modes 9 :i* we limit x are z num]\s z ! circum/ances ) :i* we h to deal1 ! ?+ ) :i* we limit x is always ! same--x is by ! introduction ( our own p]sonality4 ,?is may appe> at fir/ a direct contradiction ( all t ,i h said ab\t ! necessity = ! ,p]sonal ,factor1 b x is n4 ,"h is a p>adox4 ,to op5 out into manife/ation ! wond]ful possibilities hidd5 9 ! ,creative ,p[] ( ! ,univ]se we require to d two ?+s--to see t we ourselves are necess>y z c5t]s = focuss+ t p[]1 & at ! same "t to )draw ! ?\ght ( ourselves z contribut+ any?+ to its effici5cy4 ,x is n ,i t "w b ! ,p[]2 yet ! ,p[] ne$s me because x _c specialize itself )\t me--9 a ^w ea* is ! complem5t>y ( ! o!r3 & ! high] ! degree ( specialization is to be ! m necess>y is ! intellig5t & will+ co-op]ation ( ! individual4 ,?is is ! ,scriptural p>adox t ! son c d no?+ ( himself1 & yet we are told to be fell[-work]s ) ,god4 ,x ceases to be a p>adox1 h[ev]1 :5 we realize ! relation betwe5 ! two factors conc]n$1 ,god & ,man4 ,our mi/ake is 9 n discrim9at+ betwe5 _! respective functions1 & putt+ ,man 9 ! place ( ,god4 ,9 our ev]yday life we d ?is by measur+ ! p[] ( ,god by our pa/ exp]i5ces & ! d$uctions we draw f !m2 b !re is ano!r way ( putt+ ,man 9 ! place ( ,god1 & t is by ! misconception t ! ,all-,orig9at+ ,_s is m]ely a cosmic =ce )\t intellig5ce1 & t ,man has to orig9ate ! intellig5ce )\t :i* no specific purpose c be conceiv$4 ,?is latt] is ! error ( mu* ( ! pres5t day philosophy & has to be specially gu>d$ aga9/4 ,?is 0 p]ceiv$ by "s ( ! m$ieval /ud5ts ( ^! ?+s1 & !y accord+ly di/+ui%$ betwe5 :at !y call$ ,animus ,dei & ,anima ,mundi1 ! ,div9e ,_s & ! ,s\l ( ! ,univ]se4 ,n[ ! di/9ction is ?is1 t ! ess5tial quality ( ,animus ,dei is ,p]sonality--n ,a ,p]son1 b ! v ,pr9ciple ( ,p]sonality itself--:ile ! ess5tial quality ( ,anima ,mundi is ,imp]sonality4 ,!n "r "h comes 9 t importance ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor ( :i* ,i h already spok54 ,! p[]s lat5t 9 ! ,imp]sonal are br\ght out to _! fulle/ developm5t by ! op]ation ( ! ,p]sonal4 ,?is ( c\rse does n consi/ 9 *ang+ ! nature ( ^? p[]s1 = t is impossible1 b 9 mak+ su* comb9ations ( !m by ,p]sonal ,selection z to produce results :i* c\ld n o!rwise be obta9$4 ,?us1 = example1 ,numb] is 9 itself imp]sonal & no "o c alt] ! laws :i* are inh]5t 9 x2 b :at we c d is to select p>ticul> numb]s & ! sort ( relation1 su* z subtraction1 multiplication1 etc41 :i* we w e/abli% betwe5 !m2 & !n by ! inh]5t ,law ( ,numb] a c]ta9 result is b\nd to "w out4 ,n[ our own ess5tial quality is ! consci\sness ( ,p]sonality2 & z we gr[ into ! recognition ( ! fact t ! ,imp]sonal is1 z x 71 cry+ out = ! op]ation ^u x ( ! ,p]sonal 9 ord] to br+ its lat5t p[]s into work+1 we %all see h[ limitless is ! field t ?us op5s be=e u4 ,! prospect is wond]ful beyond our pres5t conception1 & full ( increas+ glory if we realize ! true f\ndation on :i* x re/s4 ,b h]e9 lies ! dang]4 ,x consi/s 9 n realiz+ t ! ,inf9ite ( ! ,imp]sonal is & also t ! ,inf9ite ( ! ,p]sonal is4 ,bo? are ,inf9ite & s require diff]5tiation ?r\gh our own p]sonality1 b 9 _! ess5tial quality ea* is ! exact balance ( ! o!r--n 9 contradiction to ea* o!r1 b z complem5t>y to "o ano!r1 ea* supply+ :at ! o!r ne$s = its full expression1 s t ! two toge!r make a p]fect :ole4 ,if1 h[ev]1 we see ?is relation & our own position z ! connect+ l9k betwe5 !m1 we %all see only ourselves z ! ,p]sonal ,factor2 b ! m we realize1 bo? by !ory & exp]i5ce1 ! p[] ( human p]sonality br\ght into contact ) ! ,imp]sonal ,s\l ( ,nature1 & employ$ ) a ,k ( its p[] & a correspond+ ex]cise ( ! w1 ! less we %all be incl9$ to reg>d ourselves z ! supreme factor 9 ! *a9 ( cause & effect ,consid]ation ( ?is argum5t po9ts to ! dang] ( mu* ( ! pres5t day tea*+ reg>d+ ! ex]cise ( ,?\ght ,p[] z a creative ag5cy4 ,! pr9ciple on :i* ?is tea*+ is bas$ is s\nd & legitimate = x is inh]5t 9 ! nature ( ?+s2 b ! error is 9 suppos+ t we ourselves are ! ultimate s\rce ( ,p]sonality in/ead ( m]ely ! di/ributors & specializ]s ( x4 ,! logical result ( su* a m5tal attitude is t putt+ ourselves 9 ! place ( all t is wor%ip$ z ,god :i* is spok5 ( 9 ! second *apt] ( ! ,second ,epi/le to ! ,!ssalonians & o!r p>ts ( ,scripture4 ,by ! v hypo!sis ( ! case we !n "k no high] w ?an our own1 & s are )\t any ,unify+ ,pr9ciple to prev5t ! conflict ( wills :i* mu/ !n arise--a conflict :i* mu/ become m & m de/ructive ! great] ! p[] possess$ by ! cont5d+ p>ties1 & :i*1 if !re 7 no c\nt]balanc+ p[]1 mu/ result 9 ! ultimate de/ruction ( ! exi/+ race ( m54 ,b !re is a c\nt]balanc+ p[]4 ,x is ! v same p[] us$ affirmatively in/ead ( negatively4 ,x is ! p[] ( ! ,p]sonal ) ! ,imp]sonal :5 us$ "u ! guidance ( t ,unify+ ,pr9ciple :i* ! recognition ( ! ,,"o-ness ( ! ,p]sonal ,quality 9 ! ,div9e ,_s supplies4 ,^? :o are us+ ! creative p[] ( ?\ght only f ! /&po9t ( individual p]sonality1 h obvi\sly less p[] ?an ^? :o are us+ x f ! /&po9t ( ! ,p]sonality inh]5t 9 ! ,liv+ ,_s :i* is ! ,s\rce & ,f\nta9 ( all en]gy & sub/ance1 & !re=e 9 ! end ! victory mu/ rema9 ) ^! latt]4 ,& because ! p[] by :i* !y conqu] is t ( ! ,unify+ ,p]sonality itself _! victory mu/ result 9 ! e/abli%m5t ( ,peace & ,happ9ess ?r\gh\t ! _w1 & is n a p[] ( dom9ation b ( helpfulness & enlight5m5t4 ,! *oice is betwe5 ^! two mottoes3-- ,ea* = himself & ,devil take ! h9dmo/1 or ,god = u all4 ,9 proportion1 !re=e1 z we realize ! imm5se =ces dormant 9 ! ,imp]sonal ,s\l ( ,nature1 only await+ ! introduction ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor to wake !m up into activity & direct !m to specific purposes1 ! wid] we %all f9d ! scope ( ! p[]s )9 ! rea* ( man2 & ! m cle>ly we p]ceive ! ,imp]sonalness ( ! v ,pr9ciple ( ,p]sonality itself1 ! cle>] our own prop] position z af=d+ ! ,diff]5tiat+ ,m$ium betwe5 ^! two ,inf9itudes w become to u4 ,! ,imp]sonalness ( ! ,pr9ciple ( ,p]sonality looks l a contradiction 9 t]ms1 b x is n4 ,i comb9e ^! two seem+ly contradictory t]ms z ! be/ way to convey to ! read] ! idea ( ! ess5tial ,quality ( ,p]sonality n yet diff]5tiat$ into individual c5t]s ( consci\sness = ! do+ ( p>ticul> "w4 ,look$ at 9 ?is way ! ,inf9ite ( ,p]sonality mu/ h ,unity ( ,purpose = its f\ndation1 = o!rwise x w\ld consi/ ( conflict+ p]sonalities1 9 :i* case we h n yet rea*$ ! ,,"o all-orig9at+ cause4 ,or to put x 9 ano!r way1 an ,inf9ite ,p]sonality divid$ aga9/ itself w\ld be an ,inf9ite ,insanity1 a creator ( a cosmic ,b$lam :i*1 z a sci5tific fact1 w\ld be impossible ( exi/5ce4 ,!re=e ! conception ( an ,inf9ite ( ,p]sonality necess>ily implies a p]petual ,unity ( ,purpose2 & = ! same reason ?is ,purpose c only be ! full] & full] expression ( an ,inf9ite ,unity ( ,consci\sness2 & ,unity ( ,consci\sness necess>ily implies ! entire abs5ce ( all t w\ld impair x1 & !re=e its expression c only be z ,univ]sal ,h>mony4 ,if1 !n1 ! individual realizes ?is true nature ( ! s\rce f :i* 8 own consci\sness ( p]sonality is d]iv$ 8 ideas & "w w be bas$ ^u ?is f\ndation1 ) ! result t z betwe5 ourselves peace & good w t[>ds m5 mu/ accompany ?is mode ( ?\ght1 & z betwe5 u & ! /rictly ,imp]sonal ,s\l ( ,nature our increas+ k 9 t direction w\ld mean increas+ p[] = c>ry+ out our pr9ciple ( peace & good w4 ,z ?is p]ception ( our relation to ! ,_s ( ,god & ! ,s\l ( ,nature spreads f individual to individual s ! ,k+dom ( ,god w gr[1 & its univ]sal recognition w\ld be ! e/abli%+ ( ! ,k+dom ( ,heav5 on e>?4 ,p]haps ! read] w ask :y ,i say ! ,s\l ( ,nature in/ead ( say+ ! mat]ial univ]se4 ,! reason is t 9 us+ our creative p[] ( ,?\ght we d n op]ate directly ^u mat]ial elem5ts--to d t is ! "w ( con/ruction f )\t & n ( creation f )94 ,! :ole t5d5cy ( mod]n physical sci5ce is to r$uce all matt] 9 ! f9al analysis to en]gy work+ 9 a prim>y e!r4 ,:5ce ?is en]gy & ?is e!r proce$ is n ! subject ( physical analysis4 ,t is a "q :i* _c be answ]$ by means ( ! vacuum tube or ! spectroscope4 ,physical sci5ce is do+ its legitimate "w 9 pu%+ fur!r & fur!r back ! unanalyzable residuum ( ,nature1 b1 h[ev] f> back1 an ultimate unanalyzable residuum !re mu/ always be2 & :5 physical sci5ce br+s u to ?is po9t x h&s u ov] to ! guidance ( psy*ological inve/igation j z 9 ! ,div9a ,comm$ia ,virgil transf]s ,dante to ! guidance ( ,beatrice = ! /udy ( ! high] realms4 ,v>i\s rates ( rapidity ( motion 9 ?is prim>y e!r1 produc+ v>i\s num]ical comb9ations ( positively & negatively electrifi$ p>ticles1 result 9 ! =mation ( :at we "k z ! diff]5t *emical elem5ts1 & ?us expla9s ! ph5om5a ( _! comb9+ quantities1 ! law by :i* !y jo9 toge!r to =m new sub/ances only 9 c]ta9 exact num]ical ratios4 ,f ! fir/ movem5t 9 ! prim>y e!r to solid sub/ances1 su* z wood or iron or our own fle%1 is ?us a s]ies ( vibrations 9 a succession ( m$iums1 ea* d5s] ?an ! prec$+ "o out ( :i* x 0 concret$ & f :i* x receives ! vibratory impulse4 ,?is is 9 effect :at physical sci5ce has to tell u4 ,b to get fur!r back we mu/ look into ! _w ( ! invisible1 & x is "h t psy*ological /udy comes to our aid4 ,we _c1 h[ev]1 /udy ! invisible side ( ,nature by work+ f ! outside & s at ?is po9t ( our /udies we f9d ! use ( ! "t-honor$ tea*+ reg>d+ ! p>allelism betwe5 ! ,macrocosm & ! ,microcosm4 ,if ! ,microcosm is ! reproduction 9 ourselves ( ! same pr9ciples z exi/ 9 ! ,macrocosm or univ]se 9 :i* we h our be+1 !n by inve/igat+ ourselves we %all le>n ! nature ( ! correspond+ invisible pr9ciples 9 our environm5t4 ,"h1 !n1 is ! application ( ! dictum ( ! anci5t philosophy1 ,"k ,?yself4 ,x means t ! only place :]e we c /udy ! pr9ciples ( ! invisible side ( ,nature is 9 ourselves2 & :5 we "k !m !re we c transf] !m to ! l>g] _w ar\nd u4 ,9 ! conclud+ *apt]s ( my ,ed9burgh ,lectures on ,m5tal ,sci5ce ,i h outl9$ ! way 9 :i* ! s\l or m9d op]ates ^u ! physical in/rum5t ( its expression1 & x resolves itself into ?is--t ! m5tal action inaugurates a s]ies ( vibrations 9 ! e!ric body :i*1 9 _! turn1 induce correspond+ gross] vibrations 9 ! molecul> sub/ance until f9ally me*anical action is produc$ on ! outside4 ,n[ transf]r+ ?is idea to ,nature z a :ole we %all see t if our m5tal action is to affect x 9 any way x c only be by ! response ( some?+ at ! back ( mat]ial sub/ance analog\s to m9d 9 ourselves2 & t !re is su* a some?+ int]ior to ! m]ely mat]ial side ( ,nature is prov$ by :at we may call ! ,law ( ,t5d5cy1 n only 9 animals & plants1 b ev5 9 inorganic sub/ances1 z %[n = in/ance 9 ,pr(essor ,bose's "w on ! ,response ( ,metals4 ,! univ]sal pres5ce ( ?is ,law ( ,t5d5cy !re=e indicates ! work+ ( "s non-mat]ial &1 s to say1 semi-intellig5t p[] 9 ! mat]ial _w1 a p[] :i* works p]fectly accurately on its own l9es s f> z x goes1 t is to say 9 a g5]ic mann]1 b :i* does n possess t ,p]sonal p[] ( individual selection :i* is necess>y to br+ out ! inf9ite possibilities hidd5 9 x4 ,?is is :at is meant by ! ,s\l ( ,nature1 & x is = ?is reason ,i employ t t]m in/ead ( say+ ! mat]ial univ]se4 ,:i* t]m to employ all dep5ds on ! mode ( action we are contemplat+4 ,if x is con/ruction f )\t1 !n we are deal+ ) ! purely mat]ial univ]se4 ,if we are seek+ to br+ ab\t results by ! ex]cise ( our m5tal p[] f )91 !n we are deal+ ) ! ,s\l ( ,nature4 ,x is t control ( ! l[] degree ( intellig5ce by ! high] ( :i* ,i h spok5 9 my ,ed9burgh ,lectures4 ,if we realize :at ,i h endeavor$ to make cle> 9 ! e>li] portion ( ?is book1 t ! :ole creation is produc$ by ! op]ation ( ! ,div9e ,w ^u ! ,s\l ( ,nature1 x w be evid5t t we c set no limits to ! pot5cies hidd5 9 ! latt] & capable ( be+ br\ght out by ! op]ation ( ! ,p]sonal ,factor ^u x2 !re=e1 grant$ a suffici5tly p[]ful conc5tration ( w1 :e!r by an individual or a gr\p ( individuals1 we c well imag9e ! production ( /up5d\s effects by ?is ag5cy1 & 9 ?is way ,i w\ld expla9 ! /atem5ts made 9 ,scripture reg>d+ ! m>vel\s p[]s to be ex]cis$ by ! ,anti-,*ri/1 :e!r p]sonal or collective4 ,!y are psy*ic p[]s1 ! p[] ( ! ,s\l ( ,man ov] ! ,s\l ( ,nature4 ,b ! ,s\l ( ,nature is q imp]sonal & !re=e ! moral quality ( ?is action dep5ds entirely on ! human op]ator4 ,?is is ! po9t ( ! ,ma/]'s tea*+ reg>d+ ! de/ruction ( ! fig tree1 & x is on ?is acc\nt ,he adds ! w>n+ z to ! necessity = cle>+ our he>t ( any injuri\s feel+ aga9/ o!rs :5ev] we attempt to make use ( ?is p[] 7,m>k xi3 #bj-bf74 ,accord+ to ,8 tea*+1 !n1 ?is p[] ( controll+ ! ,s\l ( ,nature by ! addition ( our own ,p]sonal ,factor1 h[ev] little we may be able to recognize x z yet1 actually exi/s2 its employm5t dep5ds on our p]ception ( ! inn] pr9ciples common to bo?1 & x is = ?is reason ! anci5t wisdom 0 summ$ up 9 ! aphorism ,"k ?yself4 ,no d\bt x is a wond]ful ,k1 b on analysis x w be f\nd to be p]fectly natural4 ,x is ! ,k ( ! cryptic =ces ( ,nature4 ,n[ x is rem>kable t ?is anci5t maxim inscrib$ ov] ! portals ( ! ,temple ( ,delphi is n to be f\nd 9 ! ,bible4 ,! ,bible maxim is n ,"k ?yself b ,"k ! ,"l4 ,! great subject ( ,k is n ourself b ! ,"l2 & h]e9 is ! great diff]5ce betwe5 ! two tea*+s4 ,! "o is limit$ by human p]sonality1 ! o!r is bas$ on ! ,inf9itude ( ! ,div9e ,p]sonality2 & because ( ?is x includes human p]sonality ) all its p[]s ov] ! ,s\l ( ,nature4 ,x is a case ( ! great] includ+ ! less2 & s ! :ole tea*+ ( ,scripture is direct$ to br++ u into ! recognition ( t ,div9e ,p]sonality :i* is ! ,great ,orig9al 9 ^: image & lik5ess we are made4 ,9 proportion z we gr[ into ! recognition ( ?is our own p]sonality w expla91 & ! creative p[] ( our ?\ght w cease to "w inv]t$ly until at la/ x w "w only on ! same pr9ciples ( ,life1 ,love & ,lib]ty z ! ,div9e ,m9d1 & s all evil w disappe> f our _w4 ,we %all n1 z "s sy/ems tea*1 be absorb$ into ,deity to ! ext9ction ( our individual consci\sness1 b on ! contr>y our individual consci\sness w cont9ually exp&1 :i* is :at ,/4 ,paul means :5 he speaks ( our increas+ ) ! increase ( ,god--! cont9ual exp&+ ( ! ,div9e elem5t )9 u4 ,b ?is c only take place by our recognition ( ourselves z receiv]s ( ?is ,div9e elem5t4 ,x is receiv+ into ourselves ( ! ,div9e ,p]sonality1 a result n to be rea*$ ?r\gh human reason+4 ,we reason f premises :i* we h assum$1 & ! conclusion is already involv$ 9 ! premises & c nev] ext5d beyond !m4 ,b we c only select our premises f among ?+s t we "k by exp]i5ce1 :e!r m5tal or physical1 & accord+ly our reason+ is always m]ely a new plac+ ( ! old ?+s4 ,b ! receiv+ ( ! ,div9e ,p]sonality into ourselves is an entirely ,new ,?+1 & s _c be rea*$ by reason+ f old ?+s4 ,h5ce if ?is ,div9e ultimate ( ! ,creative ,process is to be atta9$ x mu/ be by ! ,revelation ( a ,new ,?+ :i* w af=d a new />t+-po9t = our ?\ght1 & ?is ,new ,/>t+-po9t is giv5 9 ! ,promise ( ! ,se$ ( ! ,woman ) :i* ! ,bible op5s4 ,!nce=w>d ?is ,promise became ! c5tral g]m9at+ ?\ght ( ^? :o bas$ !mselves ^u x1 ?us con/itut+ !m a special race1 until at la/ :5 ! necess>y conditions _h matur$ ! ,promis$ ,se$ appe>$ 9 ,him ( :om x is writt5 t ,he is ! express image ( ,god's ,p]son 7,heb4 ,i3 #c7--t is1 ! ,expression ( t ,inf9ite ,div9e ,p]sonality ( :i* ,i h spok54 ,no man ha? se5 ,god at any "t or c see ,him1 = ! simple reason t ,inf9itude _c be ! subject ( vision4 ,to become visible !re mu/ be ,individualization1 & !re=e :5 ,philip said ,%[ u ! ,fa!r1 ,jesus repli$1 ,he t ha? se5 me ha? se5 ! ,fa!r4 ,! ,^w mu/ become fle% be=e ,/4 ,john c\ld say1 ,t :i* 0 f ! beg9n+1 :i* we h he>d1 :i* we h se5 ) our eyes1 :i* we h look$ ^u1 & our h&s h h&l$1 ( ! ,^w ( ,life4 ,?is is ! ,new ,/>t+-po9t = ! true ,new ,?\ght--! ,new ,adam ( ! ,new ,race1 ea* ( :om is a new c5t] = ! work+ ( ! ,div9e ,_s4 ,?is is :at ,jesus meant :5 he said1 ,except ye eat ! fle% & dr9k ! blood ( ! ,son ( ,man ye h no life 9 y4 ,my fle% is meat inde$1 & my blood is dr9k inde$-- su* a contemplation ( ! ,div9e ,p]sonality 9 ,him z w cause a l receiv+ ( ! ,div9e ,p]sonality into individualization 9 ourselves--?is is ! great purpose ( ! ,creative ,process 9 ! individual4 ,x t]m9ates ! old s]ies :i* began ) bir? aft] ! fle% & inaugurates a ,new ,s]ies by bir? aft] ! ,_s1 a ,new ,life ( inf9ite unfoldm5t ) glori\s possibilities beyond our highe/ conception4 ,b all ?is is logically bas$ ^u our recognition ( ! ,p]sonalness ( ,god & ( ! relation ( our individual p]sonality to ?is ,et]nal & ,inf9ite ,p]sonality1 & ! result ( ?is is ,wor%ip--n an attempt to butt] up ! ,almighty & get ,him into good temp]1 b ! rev]5t contemplation ( :at ?is ,p]sonality mu/ be 9 ,itself2 & :5 we see x to be t ,life1 ,love1 ,beauty1 etc41 ( :i* ,i spoke at ! beg9n+ ( ?is book we %all le>n to love ,him = :at ,he ,,is1 & our pray] w be ,give me m ( ,?yself4 ,if we realize ! great tru? t ! ,k+dom ( ,heav5 is )9 u1 t x is ! ,k+dom ( ! inn]mo/ ( our own be+ & ( all creation1 & if we realize t ?is inn]mo/ is ! place ( ! ,orig9at+ ,p[] :]e ,"t & ,space d n exi/ & !re=e antec$5t to all conditions1 !n we %all see ! true mean+ ( ,wor%ip4 ,x is ! p]ception ( ! ,inn]mo/ ,_s z et]nally subsi/+ indep5d5tly ( all condition$ manife/ation1 s t 9 ! true wor%ip our consci\sness is remov$ f ! out] sph]e ( exi/5ce to ! inn]mo/ c5t] ( uncondition$ be+4 ,!re we f9d ! ,et]nal ,be+ ( ,god pure & simple1 & we /& rev]5tly 9 ?is ,supreme ,pres5ce kn[+ t x is ! ,s\rce ( our own be+1 & wrapt 9 ! contemplation ( ,?is1 ! condition$ is se5 to fl[ out f ,x4 ,p]ceiv+ ?is ! condition$ passes out ( our consid]ation1 = x is se5 n to be ! ,et]nal ,reality--we h rea*$ t level ( consci\sness :]e ,"t & ,space rema9 no long]4 ,yet ! rev]5ce :i* ! vision ( ?is ,supreme ,c5t] ( all ,be+ _c fail to inspire is c\pl$ ) a s5se ( feel+ q at home ) ,x4 ,?is is because z ! ,c5t] ( all ,be+ x is ! c5t] ( our own be+ also4 ,x is "o-)-ourselves4 ,x is recogniz+ ,itself f our own c5t] ( consci\sness2 s t "h we h got back to t ,self-contemplation ( ,_s :i* is ! fir/ movem5t ( ! ,creat+ ,p[]1 only n[ ?is ,self-contemplation is ! action ( ! ,all-,orig9at+ ,_s ^u ,itself f ! c5t] ( our own consci\sness4 ,s ?is wor%ip 9 ! ,temple ( ! ,inn]mo/ is at once rev]5t adoration & famili> int]c\rse--n ! famili>ity t bre$s contempt1 b a famili>ity produc+ ,love1 because z x increases we see m cle>ly ! true ,life ( ! ,_s z ! cont9ual int]action ( ,love & ,beauty1 & ! ,_s's recognition ( ourselves z an integral portion ( ,its own ,life4 ,?is is n an unpractical dreamy speculation b has a v practical be>+4 ,dea? w "s day cease to be1 = ! simple reason t ,life alone c be ! endur+ pr9ciple2 b we h n yet rea*$ ?is po9t 9 our evolution4 ,:e!r any 9 ?is g5]ation w rea* x ,i _c say2 b = ! rank & file ( u ! dea? ( ! body seems to be by f> ! m probable ev5t4 ,n[ :at mu/ ?is pass+ out ( ! body mean to u8 ,x mu/ mean t we f9d ourselves )\t ! physical vehicle :i* is ! in/rum5t ?r\gh :i* our consci\sness comes 9 t\* ) ! ext]nal _w & all ! int]e/s ( our pres5t daily life4 ,b ! m]e putt+ (f ( ! body does n ( itself *ange ! m5tal attitude2 & s if our m9d is entirely c5t]$ ^u ^! pass+ int]e/s & ext]nal conditions ! loss ( ! in/rum5t by :i* we held t\* ) !m mu/ involve a consci\sness ( desire = ! only sort ( life we h kn[n c\pl$ ) a consci\sness ( our inability to p>ticipate 9 x1 :i* c only result 9 a consci\sness ( di/ress & confusion su* z 9 our pres5t /ate we _c imag9e4 ,on ! o!r h& if we h 9 ?is _w realiz$ ! true pr9ciple ( ! ,wor%ip ( ! ,et]nal ,s\rce f :i* all condition$ life fl[s out--an inn] commun+ ) ! ,great ,reality--we h already pass$ beyond t consci\sness ( life :i* is limit$ by ,"t & ,space2 & s :5 we put (f ?is mortal body we %all f9d ourselves ^u famili> gr\nd1 & !re=e n w&]+ 9 confusion b q at home1 dwell+ 9 ! same light ( ! ,et]nal 9 :i* we h be5 accu/om$ to dwell z an atmosph]e envelop+ ! condition$ life ( to-day4 ,!n f9d+ ourselves ?us at home on a plane :]e ,"t & ,space d n exi/ !re w be no "q ) u ( duration4 ,! consci\sness w be simply t ( peaceful1 happy be+4 ,t a return to m active p]sonal op]ation w ev5tually take place is evid5c$ by ! fact t ! basis ( all fur!r evolution is ! diff]5tiat+ ( ! ,undiff]5tiat$ ,life ( ! ,_s into specific *annels ( "w1 ?r\gh ! int]m$i>y ( individual p]sonality )\t :i* ! inf9ite pot5tialities ( ! ,creative ,law _c be br\ght to light4 ,!re=e1 h[ev] v>i\s our op9ions z to its precise =m1 ,resurrection z a pr9ciple is a necessity ( ! creative process4 ,b su* a return to m active life w n mean a return to limitations1 b ! op5+ ( a new life 9 :i* we %all transc5d !m all1 because we h pass$ beyond ! misconception t ,"t & ,space are ( ! ,ess5ce ( ,life4 ,:5 ! misconception reg>d+ ,"t & ,space is entirely eradicat$ all o!r limitations mu/ disappe> because !y h _! root 9 ?is prim>y "o--!y are only p>ticul> =ms ( ! g5]al proposition4 ,!re=e ?\gh ,=m ) its accompany+ relations ( ,"t & ,space is necess>y = manife/ation1 ^! ?+s w be f\nd n to h any =ce 9 !mselves ?us creat+ limitation1 b to be ! reflection ( ! mode ( ?\ght :i* projects !m z ! expression ( itself4 ,nor is !re any inh]5t reason :y ?is process %\ld be delay$ till "s f>-(f future4 ,!re is no reason :y we %\ld n comm5ce at once4 ,no d\bt our inh]it$ & p]sonally eng5d]$ modes ( ?\ght make ?is difficult1 & by ! nature ( ! process x w be only :5 all our ?\ghts are con=m$ to ?is pr9ciple t ! complete victory w be won4 ,b !re mu/ be a comm5cem5t to ev]y?+1 & ! m we habituate ourselves to live 9 t ,c5t] ( ! ,inn]mo/ :]e conditions d n exi/1 ! m we %all f9d ourselves ga9+ control ov] outw>d conditions1 because ! /ream ( condition$ life fl[s out f ! ,c5t] ( ,uncondition$ ,life1 & !re=e ?is intr9sic pr9ciple ( ,wor%ip has 9 x ! promise bo? ( ! life t n[ is & ( t :i* is to come4 ,only we mu/ rememb] t ! really avail+ wor%ip is t ( ! ,undiff]5tiat$ ,s\rce because ,x is ! ,s\rce1 & n z a backh&$ way ( div]t+ ! /ream into "s petty *annel ( conditions1 = t w\ld only be to get back to ! old circle ( limitation f :i* we are seek+ to escape4 ,b if we realize ^! ?+s we h already laid hold ( ! ,pr9ciple ( ,resurrection1 & 9 po9t ( pr9ciple we are already liv+ ! resurrection life4 ,:at progress we may make 9 x dep5ds on our practical application ( ! pr9ciple2 b simply z pr9ciple !re is no?+ 9 ! pr9ciple itself to prev5t its complete work+ at any mom5t4 ,?is is :y ,jesus did n ref] resurrection to "s remote po9t ( "t b said1 ,i am ! resurrection & ! life4 ,no pr9ciple c c>ry 9 itself an opposite & limit+ pr9ciple contradictory ( its own nature1 & ?is is z true ( ! ,pr9ciple ( ,life z ( any o!r pr9ciple4 ,x is we :o by our ?\ght introduce an opposite & limit+ pr9ciple & s h9d] ! work+ ( ! pr9ciple we are seek+ to br+ into op]ation2 b s f> z ! ,pr9ciple ( ,life itself is conc]n$ !re is 9 x no reason :y x %\ld n come into p]fect manife/ation "h & n[4 ,?is1 !n1 is ! true purpose ( wor%ip4 ,x is to br+ u into consci\s & lov+ int]c\rse ) ! ,supreme ,s\rce ( our own be+1 & see+ ?is we %all n neglect ! outw>d =ms ( wor%ip4 ,f :at we n[ "k !y %\ld mean m to u ?an to o!rs & n less2 & 9 especial if we realize ! manife/ation ( ! ,div9e ,p]sonality 9 ,jesus ,*ri/ & its reproduction 9 ,man1 we %all n neglect ,8 la/ comm& to p>take ( t sacr$ memorial to ,8 fle% & blood :i* ,he bequea!d to ,8 foll[]s ) ! words ,?is d 9 remembrance ( ,me4 ,?is holy rite is no sup]/iti\s human inv5tion4 ,!re are _m !ories ab\t x1 & ,i d n wi% to combat any ( !m1 = 9 ! end !y all seem to me to br+ u to ! same po9t1 t be+ cleans$ f s9 by ! ,div9e ,love we are n[ no long] sep>ate f ,god b become p>tak]s ( ! ,div9e-,nature 7,,ii ,pet] ,i3 #d74 ,?is p>tak+ ( ! ,div9e ,nature c\ld n be m accurately repres5t$ ?an by our p>tak+ ( bread & w9e z symbols ( ! ,div9e ,sub/ance & ! ,div9e ,life1 ?us made emblematic ( ! :ole ,creative ,process f its beg9n+ 9 ! ,div9e ,?\ght to its completion 9 ! manife/ation ( t ,?\ght z ,p]fect$ ,man2 & s x br+s vividly be=e u ! remembrance ( ! ,p]sonality ( ,god tak+ =m z ! ,son ( ,man4 ,we are all famili> ) ! say+ t ?\ghts become ?+s2 & if we affirm ! creative p[] ( our own ?\ght z reproduc+ itself 9 outw>d =m1 h[ mu* m mu/ we affirm ! same ( t ,div9e ,?\ght :i* br+s ! :ole univ]se into exi/5ce2 s t 9 accordance ) our own pr9ciples ! ,div9e ,idea ( ,man 0 logically b\nd to %[ itself 9 ! _w ( "t & space z ! ,son ( ,god & ! ,son ( man1 n two diff]+ natures b "o complete :ole1 ?us summ+ up ! f\ndation pr9ciple ( all creation 9 "o ,undivid$ ,consci\sness ( ,p]sonality4 ,?us ! ,^w or ,div9e ,?\ght ( ,man became fle%1 & our p>tak+ ( ! symbolic elem5ts keeps 9 our remembrance ! supreme tru? t ?is same ,^w or ,?\ght ( ,god 9 l mann] takes =m 9 ourselves z we op5 our own ?\ght to receive x4 ,& fur!r1 if we realize t ?r\gh\t ! univ]se !re is only ,,"o ,orig9at+ ,life1 s5d+ =? only ,,"o ,orig9al ,sub/ance z ! vehicle = its expression1 !n x logically foll[s t 9 ess5ce ! bread is a portion ( ! et]nal ,sub/ance ( ,god1 & ! w9e a portion ( ! et]nal ,life ( ,god4 ,= ?\gh ! w9e is ( c\rse also a "p ( ! ,univ]sal ,sub/ance1 we mu/ rememb] t ! ,univ]sal ,sub/ance is itself a manife/ation ( ! ,life ( ! ,all-,creat+ ,_s1 & !re=e ?is fluid =m ( ! prim>y sub/ance has be5 select$ z repres5t+ ! et]nal fl[+ ( ! ,life ( ! ,_s into all creation1 culm9at+ 9 its supreme expression 9 ! consci\sness ( ^? :o1 9 ! recognition ( ^! tru?s1 seek to br+ _! he>t into union ) ! ,div9e ,_s4 ,f su* consid]ations z ^! x w be se5 h[ va/ a field ( ?\ght is cov]$ by ,*ri/'s words ,d ?is 9 remembrance ( ,me4 ,9 conclusion1 !re=e1 d n let y\rselves be l$ a/ray by any philosophy t d5ies ! ,p]sonality ( ,god4 ,9 ! end x w be f\nd to be a fooli% philosophy4 ,no o!r />t+-po9t ( creation is conceivable ?an ! ,self-,contemplation ( ! ,div9e ,_s1 & ! logical sequ5ce f ?is br+s u to ! ultimate result ( ! ,creative ,process 9 ! /atem5t t if any man be 9 ,*ri/ he is a ,new creature1 or z ! m>g9 has x a new creation 7,,ii ,cor4 v3 #ag74 ,su* va9 philosophies h only "o logical result :i* is to put y\rself 9 ! place ( ,god1 & !n :at h y to lean ^u 9 ! h\r ( trial8 ,x is l try+ to climb up a ladd] t is re/+ aga9/ no?+4 ,!re=e1 says ! ,apo/le ,paul1 ,bew>e le/ any man spoil y ?r\gh philosophy & va9 deceit1 aft] ! tradition ( man1 aft] ! rudim5ts ( ! _w1 & n aft] ,*ri/4 7,col4 ,,ii3 #h47 ,! tea*+ ( ! ,bible is s\nd philosophy1 s\nd reason+1 & s\nd sci5ce because x />ts ) ! s\nd premises t all ,creation proce$s out ( ,god1 & t ,man is made 9 ! image & lik5ess ( 8 ,creator4 ,x n[h]e dep>ts f ! ,law ( ,cause & ,effect1 & by ! ord]ly sequ5ce ( ?is law x br+s u at la/ to ! ,new ,creation bo? 9 ourselves & 9 our environm5t1 s t we f9d ! completion ( ! ,creative ,process 9 ! decl>ation ! tab]nacle ( ,god is ) m5 7,rev4 xxi3 #c71 & 9 ! promise ,?is is ! ,cov5ant t ,i w make ) !m aft] ^? days 7i4e41 ! days ( our imp]fect appreh5sion ( ^! ?+s7 sai? ! ,"l1 ,i w dwell 9 !m1 & walk 9 !m1 & ,i w be _! ,god1 & !y %all be my p1 & ,i w put my laws into _! he>ts1 & 9 _! m9ds w ,i write !m1 & _! s9s & _! iniquities w ,i rememb] no m 7,heb4 x3 #af4 ,,ii ,cor4 vi3 #af4 ,j]emiah xxxi3 #cc74 ,truly does ,bacon say1 ,a little philosophy incl9e? a man's m9d to a!ism1 b dep? 9 philosophy br+e? m5's m9ds ab\t to religion4 --,bacon1 ,essay1 xvi4 ,,footnotes ,footnote #a3 ,see my ,dor ,lectures1 #aiji4 ,footnote #b3 ,see my ,ed9burgh ,lectures on ,m5tal ,sci5ce4 ,footnote #c3 ,see my ,dor ,lectures1 #aiji4 ,footnote #d3 ,= ! relation betwe5 consci\s & sub-consci\s m9d see my ,ed9burgh ,lectures on ,m5tal ,sci5ce4 ,footnote #e3 ,see ,self-,syn!sis by ,dr4 ,cornwall ,r\nd4 ,footnote #f3 ,= ! relation betwe5 subjective & objective m9d see my ,ed9burgh ,lectures on ,m5tal ,sci5ce4 ,footnote #g3 ,?is view1 x may be rem>k$1 is n necess>ily incompatible ) ! conception ( re9c>nation1 on :i* !ory ! f9al resurrection or transmutation ( ! body w\ld t]m9ate ! s]ies ( successive lives & dea?s1 ?us br++ ! individual out ( ! circle ( g5]ation1 :i* is ! circle ( ,k>ma4 ,i may1 p]haps1 h ! opportunity ( consid]+ ?is subject on "s future occasion4 ,footnote #h3 ,see my ,bible ,my/]y & ,bible ,mean+4 ,footnote #i3 ,see ,bible ,my/]y & ,bible ,mean+ by ! pres5t au?or4